Forensic Psychologist Dr. Shannon Curry Cross-Examined (Johnny Depp v Amber Heard Trial)
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 04. 2022
- Forensic psychologist Dr. Shannon Curry took the stand on Tuesday. She testified about the observations she concluded when working with Amber Heard related to personality disorders. She spoke about PTSD, borderline personality disorder, histrionic personality disorder, anxiety, emotional reactivity, and more during her testimony. During this segment, Dr. Curry was cross-examined by Heard's attorney.
#AmberHeard #JohnnyDepp #ShannonCurry
Watch Law&Crime Network NOW on CZcamsTV!
tv.czcams.com/users/welcome?...
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
OTHER WAYS TO WATCH LAW&CRIME NETWORK IN YOUR AREA:
lawandcrime.com/where-to-watch/
READ MORE GREAT ARTICLES FROM LAW&CRIME NETWORK HERE:
lawandcrime.com
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF Law&Crime Network CZcams Channels:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Channel B: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel C: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel D / @lawandcrimebodycam - Zábava
Who’s back in 2024 to watch Dr. Curry’s awesomeness 👀💕
Truly can't get enough of this woman! She is a real class act! ♥
👀👀💕
🤮🤮👇👇😂
She’s the boss. AH is an emotional, verbal, physical and psychological abuser, no doubt! And a huge liar!
me
Every time AH’s attorney asks Curry a question and she responds with “that is not correct” gives me so much serotonin
Dr Curry didn't get into medical school and every time she is asked a question about someone who did she can't recall anything.
@@lindasmith1105 lmao u liked ur own comment. Btw if she didnt went to medical school you think they wouldnt have known?
@@lindasmith1105 yea the military would hire untrained doctors to be doctors. Lol
@@lindasmith1105 Dr. Shannon Curry gained a Bachelors degree in Psychology and Social Behaviour from the University of California Irvine.
Then, she went on to get a Master’s and Doctorate degree in Clinical Psychology at Pepperdine University in Malibu, California.
She also has a postdoctoral Master of Science degree in Clinical Psychopharmacology (MSCP) from Alliant University, a private college in Alhambra, California.
You do not need to go to med school to be a psycologist, get your facts togther Linda
@@lindasmith1105 Yeah, cause psychologists don't go to medical school? Maybe you're thinking of psychiatrists, they are medical doctors
“I’ll read it for you if you’re having difficulty” imagine treating a PhD with a decade and a half of experience like she’s illiterate just to discredit her in front of a jury and then calling Dr Spiegel as your expert witness. 🙄
Oh that boiled my pee bag uncontrollably when Elaine did that! 😤😂
LOL LOL LOL
WE DONT HAVE TO IMAGINE IT... IT HAPPENED!! LOL!! YEAH. ITS CRAZY.
@@teddy2577😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Good grief! AH team are a joke! Where did she find them, on a bus stop bench? Her lawyer is rude and argues with the judge every time she sustains an objection from the plaintiff. What a ridiculous show!
just under a year later, and this video still remains as one of the best examples of someone being a master of their class.
long live Dr. Shannon Curry!
And Elaine looking like a 1st lawyer
Absolutely!
@@samgarnett9174ELAINE LKKE AMBER SUCKS
Notice that after this Amber comes in with glasses ? Lol yet she keeps taking them on and off. It’s funny .
Not too long though, i mean the body starts rotting around the 110s and 120s.
That woman is a boss. She articulates herself so well and she takes no bs
@@truthmatters8364 objection, hearsay
just to be clear, I was replying to a now deleted comment, not the OP with which I 100 % agree.
@@ioandragulescu6063 😂😂😂😂 muffins anyone
The Doc evaluation is as standing an "AMBER ALERT" to all. 🤣
She was ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
@@truthmatters8364 strange interview
Lawyer: “I am smarter than you”.
Dr. Curry: “That is not correct”.
👏
😂👏🏼
Exactly
Fax
I know I love every time she says that
Pretty sure Dr. Shannon Curry was literally diagnosing Ambers Lawyer while being examined and questioned at this point. 😂
Absolutely!! I forgot which one of the Utubers commented that clients choose their lawyers that kinda resemble themselves.. after watching ah’s UK deposition, ,, listening to the rude and obnoxious lawyer plus her team in Fairfax VA I completely believe it.!!
LOL! That is hysterical…..8-) And probably true! LOL!
Just when Camille couldn’t get any better, she was the one reached out to Dr. Curry. She got her on the stand. THANK YOU CAMILLE!
Who run the world? GIRLS! GIRLS! 💪🏻
Awesome Shannon Curry 🤘🎩🦅
But Camille has done a very good job in the cross examination too !
I am so grateful to dr Ewi1 on CZcams who cured me from hsv_2 with his effective herbal medicine may God bless you sir you are truly a man of your world
@@ShadyGrady3 they both are attractive ladies.
She’s what’s known as a model witness... clear, concise, forthcoming, confident without coming off as cocky or overconfident, friendly but serious, professional and seemingly interested only in unbiased facts. One of the best expert witnesses I’ve ever seen.
Totally agree, she was great.
And she could be a model 😅
Just a total professional. Even the way she dresses and does hair and makeup.
@@ashleighmackenzie8670 yes, very professional
@@justintrimbull4334 maybe Johnny should go for women like the Doc
The amount of pure disrespect Amber’s lawyers give every witness is EMBARRASSING.
They're horrible just like Amber, that's why she chose them
@@christinacooper1093 lmfao yes exactly
There is no other way for them to go even close to winning..
The lawyer is doing an excellent job!!!
She was super nasty when reading the text messages from Depp 😂😂
My whole thing is the fact that this doctor went on the stand BEFORE Amber & clearly told us & explained to the jury how Amber would be on the stand & told us exactly how she would act & the antics she would do & Amber didn’t fail to do EVERY bit of it!
I watched it live but now I'm rewatching it, and I was like if I was Amber I would be writing down every negative character trait and behavior she attributed to me and try to avoid that as much as possible while on the stand, and when Amber is writing the whole time Dr Curry is talking that almost looks like what she's doing. LMAO talk about insane lack of self awareness
I believe that was a strategy and a brilliant one!
Team Depp has put doctor Curry as one of their last witnesses so that all her expert opinions would be fresh in jurors' minds when AH takes the stand.
@@kill_kali The exact traits that Dr Curry described is what would prevent such introspection. Amber was not hearing all of those faults and toxic traits as being hers, in her mind none of those things were true about her.
@@zoniannitrate2905 I completely agree, I just thought she would be able to put on a fake persona at least for a few minutes and then we will watch it slowly slip but she just went balls deep right off the bat 😂
@@kill_kali Yep aha and it was a marvel to see.
“May I clarify what occurred so we can stop talking about muffins?”
You can’t manipulate a psychologist. They’re literally trained to recognize what you’re doing.
her lawyer is absolutely pathetic and disgusting.
Yes, a narcissistic abuser can manipulate a psychologist.
Didn't work out so well for Harley Quinn though
@@chengheskhan4670 well just so happens that ,that was a movie
Ikr lol
This psychologist caught all of the technicalities that the attorney is trying to trip her up on. As someone who studies legal psychology, this expert witness is a 10/10.
Interesting profession! Could you explain the use case? How would you put a degree like that to use?
She makes me want to become a forensic psychologist ✨🙂✨
She makes me want to become a forensic psychologist ✨🙂✨
She makes me want to become a forensic psychologist ✨🙂✨
She makes me want to become a forensic psychologist ✨🙂✨
You know when an attorney is desperate and failing miserably at discrediting a very credible expert witness when the attorney focuses on dinner, drinks, and muffins.
THE MUFFINS! hahahaha oh man that part had me howling!
That's a gross exaggeration. The questions about dinner and her husband being aware she had amber coming in (not about muffins), lasted a few minutes out of the entire testimony. You've dismissed the fact that she is not focusing on muffins but the fact that curry was not confidential about her client. And she was unprofessional in going to his home to be interviewed. That is highly unprofessional. No matter her excuse, the one she gives is pathetic. She could've went to their office instead of his house. She's never done it before and hasn't done it since. Listen to her. She coincidentally doesn't recall anything that sheds a bad light that was in the evidence she supposedly read, saw & heard. She lied several times and had new explanations for why her answers are now different.
Ppl have discredited Hughes simply because of her looking at notes for NUMBERS. CURRY asked for her notes several times for numbers and test results. And again, can't recall anything negative about Depp
His lawyers had already prediagnosed her before curry assessed her or she told them she'd be able to diagnose her with those disorders BEFORE assessing her. That was just read out for you to hear.
@@cruz4790 Amber lost honey. 😇
@@alib3208 ali b, Depp is still a wife beater and deemed so by not only 1 judge, but 3 judges denied his appeal and THAT will always be a fact. So Depp lost that battle. She hasn't been declared a wife neater. He'll Always be a wife beater, honey.
@@cruz4790 LOL. Thank you for writing a book to support your analysis. The substance of their discussions would have occurred whether they held the meeting in Dr. Curry’s office, Depp’s home, or at the zoo. And since you brought up Dr. Hughes, she was not credible as an expert witness. An expert witness should not have to refer to notes throughout his/her testimony. Nice try though. 😉
That slow blink and tired smile Dr. Curry does every time Elaine tries to trap her makes me laugh every time. It never, ever worked.
Lol she tired of the muffins
I thought I worked on Johnny Debt
Elaine: Do you know the muffin man?
Shannon: The muffin man?
Elaine: The muffin man.
Shannon: Yes, I know the muffin man.
Elaine: 😮
@@zeldagoblin Elaine: well let's go to page 354 where you ADMIT, under OATH, that you do, in FACT, know the muffin man!
Shannon: yeah, I'm agreeing with you...?
Elaine: OBJECTION, HEARSAY!
@@leminjapan imagine my disappointment when I realised I wasn't the first person to make the link. The internet is full Shannon Curry muffin man memes 😝
I really admire all the times she straight up said "That confused me", "I'm not sure I understand", "Can you repeat that". That shows such honesty and confidence.
No it doesn't it's what she wants you to believe. She's playing a part.
Also it gives her extra time to think about what she's going to say.
This is Amber heard I'm talking about!
Okay dear .oops
@@cynthiawulf7883 I don’t know why you’re talking about Amber Heard when OP is talking about Dr. Curry
@@browncatwithblurredbackgro2461 No she’s not
“May I clarify what occurred so we can stop talking about muffins?” This made my day
what's the timestamp of this?
@@TheTheKraven around 25 minutes
Meanwhile...
How many times she had to tell the attorney she brought muffins to work JUST BECAUSE she does it all the time was so frustrating.
“My husband did not buy the muffins for Ms. Heard.” 😂😂😂
BOSS
I've re watched this several times and Every Single time, Elaine feels more and more like the local gossip rather than an attorney on a high profile case.
It's a loser case and there's so much evidence because these celebrities went on more holidays in one year than most people in their lifetime and they had more staff than they can remember.
I agree with you 😂 I have never seen eating dinner including high-profile case.
She's a different type of Karen. Her strategy is basically bulling the whole working class in this case.
I like how she uses the phrase, “that’s not quite right”. Genius when trying to get around the yes and no questions trial attorneys want you to answer.
This attorney is using logical fallacies to try to twist this woman’s words and expertise and this woman is handling it like a champ! Thank god she’s as intelligent and qualified as she is.
This week end I'll try my best to take a shot every time Dr.Curry said "It's not correct". I think I'll die but I'll give it an honest try.
AGREED!!!!!!!!!!!
THESE ATTORNEYS TWIST WORDS AROUND TO TRY AND TRICK THE WITNESSES INTO GETTING CAUGHT IN A LIE……..”I’m sorry, can you please repeat the question?”
Would you agree that some IPV perpetrators have pony tails? Would you agree that Mr. Depp has a pony tail? So you would agree that Mr. Depp shares characteristics of IPV perpetrators?
It’s a really bad idea to gaslight someone who is almost quite literally an expert in gaslighting lmfaooo.
Dr Curry’s slight smile throughout all this just screams “I can’t believe this woman”. Dr. Curry is amazing
9:21 for about 30 secs straight lol.
9:43**
I am in love. Seriously
You like her rhinoplasty, her uber-painted face, her peroxided hair. You are irrational. Hopefully you aren't hormonal enough to be an abuser.
Look at 1:5:35 onward somthing happened between curry ang depp
@@SuhailKhan-zi9xc ☺️ I'M THINKING THAT THEY'RE THINKING "WHAT ARE WE DOING IN THIS ROOM FULL OF SCHMUCK'S?" LOL 😂
I love that Elaine is asking questions that make it very obvious the kind of answer she wants, Dr. Curry gives her an accurate and truthful answer, Elaine interrupts with "Answer my question, yes or no," because Dr. Curry's answer isn't what she wants, and then Dr. Curry gives another answer, "I don't know" or "That's not my task," that Elaine doesn't want but can't fight against.
It's amazing to see.
Gotta say this as well.
Elaine: **asks a question**
Dr. Curry: **gives a truthful statement that cannot be misinterpreted**
Elaine: "You said, UNDER OATH..." **proceeds to read off the exact same answer, just with the words rearranged, as if that proves she's changing her answers or lying**
@@choryllis6646 I noticed this, too.
E is desperate
You're supposed to answer "yes or no" while being cross examined and the other attorney can object because if they ramble they can influence the jury by excessive answers.
What is so fascinating with this, watching the trial out of sequence as I am, is that Amber, when being cross examined, not only mimicked Dr Currys hairstyle but she mimicked her way of responding to cross examination with clipped answers etc.
"Correct!".
"That is correct!"
Omgosh I see what you're saying, nice try at acting Amber but xxxxx nooo
I just realized that she was also mimicking Dr Curry at some instances during Camille's last cross when she turned to the jury and started explaining some detail, like she was teaching them.
Right... i noticed that too.....she would say " Incorrect".... " I would not characterise it that way". She just wanted to sound intelligent.
Amber is nuts
She did this the whole trial. I think it’s common in people with personality disorders.
"We detect behaviors, we detect mental status -- we don't detect crimes," just so on point ☝️
Actually, that's not true. Psychologists who are experts in IPV do assess for the presence of IPV, and make determinations of who the perpetrator and who the victim is, and what the risks and needs are. And no, best evidence practice doesn't include interviews with the other person who is alleged to be the perpetrator. This is based on years and years of research, mountains of data.
The lawyer didn't do a great job, and Dr Curry spoke very well, but a lot of the points that the lawyer made were valid.
@@Tamarahope77 So u are stating that there are years o years of research, mountains of data but those are not build on top of working with "perpetrators". Im assuming u think they are putting those things in cages and observe them or study their crimes. Funny. Maybe thats the reason the real psycho live their free lifes and dont get cought :) There are so many unresolved cases... if we only know the reason. I 100% sure u will not even understand what im trying to point u.
@@darklca No I don't think that.
ETA: and yes research is built on working with perpetrators.
@@Tamarahope77 "who are experts in IPV" she's not an expert for IPV, she's a clinical psychologist, therefore she does not do that, in fact it would be considered "out of the scope of clinical psychology", wouldn't it?
Kool someone stole your comment lol 😆
This woman is making these lawyers look like absolute clowns.... Bravo.
Not really. She’s just not falling for pitfalls and traps.
I agree!
@@mattm8932 ...and in the process making them look like clowns. 🤡
She's amazing
Truly the only person who earned what shes worth so far.
Doctor Curry is a true boss. She was professional, respectful, unflustered, precise, and did not take any bull from Amber Heard's lawyer's fishing expedition.
An intelligent, capable woman.
I couldn't say it better
Well stated, Elaine was way out of her league here.
@@bobbicatt---- Elaine can't even get the disorders correct, of border line personality disorder and bipolar disorder. I had to hit rewind the first time I heard this thinking I had just miss heard. These are two totally different disorders.
@@galewesterman1182 lol she couldn’t even get Ambers name correct and called her Laura .lol . Yeah Elaine was way out of her league here.
"That was my answer that time and it's inconsistent with the question you've ask!" Made my day! 🤣😳🤭😭
Time stamp, please?
Elaine moved on very swiftly after that statement.
52:08 The exchange begins and at 53:28 is Dr. Currys quote
@@hayers248 Thank you 😊
This Forensic Psychologist, Dr. Curry, makes big money and she’s worth every dollar. She was unflappable, articulate, experienced in a court setting, and extremely thorough. She’s worth her weight in gold!
💜 DR SHANNON CURRY IS SO AMAZING. SHE'S SO STUNNINGLY BEAUTIFUL & HER INTELLIGENCE IS BEYOND ALL OF AH ATTORNEYS TOGETHER.
@@katymcginn4644 yes, especially the stunning beauty is of utmost importance here
@@adphreak123 love the sarcasm lol
They All ARE SUPPOSED TO REMAIN THIS COMPOSED through a cross examination in order to not be discredited by the lawyer. Further YES or NO answers are actually what is required. Anything more you give the lawyer more to cross you on.
@@ajlavanetwork5755 yeah but not many people can do that as well as she did and she is by far the most composed and articulate witness I have ever seen even compared to other psychologists.
This attorney is shocking. She is aggressive, continues cutting Dr Curry off, and tries to twist Dr Curry words around. Huge compliments to Dr Curry. She is extremely professional!!!!
This is her job, to discredit the expert witness. Annoying and provoking the witness is normal.
I thought I was the only who caught that Attorney's tone , aggressive and rude
@@loosilu that’s now the job of attorney
@@madee.6831 Yeah, the point is to crack the witness.
@@loosilu that's so wrong omg
I've been a lawyer for 15 years. I cannot believe she is a partner. She is ridiculous!
I think she is related to one of the senior partners... ( really don't think she'd be a partner otherwise )
It was pretty bad, right!? Elaine might as well just went up there and say to the jury... We have no defense, so I'm going to ask questions about muffins! 😂🎪
Lawyers usually make themselves likable to the jury, but Elaine never did.
@@ab62051 If that is the case, I'm guessing she was given this case so that her incompetence could be put on display nationwide.
You wanna be even more confused? Watch or read the Sidebars [in the official transcript] that were recently released (the stuff said when lawyers approached Judge A). It is not only hysterical, but Elaine somehow looks WORST at sidebar than she did in front of the jury! Judge A at a certain point had to explain the definition of "hearsay" to Elaine! Goog Depp Dive to read the official transcripts. CZcamsrs reading:
-Corgisaan (casual & fun), -Legal Vices (funniest dramatic readings, with his other lawyer friends. Next video on Tues 9/19/23),
-Cheap Seats (1 video per day of trial. Only one to utilize court video in her readings)
-Emily D Baker- (former prosecutor. funny & knowledgeable about the law. Did 3 Lives of Sidebars, but 1st one is member only)
Had to watch again after watching an interview with Dr Curry. She's such a professional, yet still comes off very warm. I imagine she has helped a lot of people.
What makes her such a great expert witness is that I truly believe she would have provided the same unbias analysis if she was retained by Amber Heard's team to do an evaluation of Johnny Depp. Dr. Curry established credibility by answering the more open ended general questions as she would in a vacuum and case specific question only as they related to the data and information provided. Camille gets a lot of credit for her cross examination of Amber (as she should) but Dr. Curry played a major role by clearly laying a foundation based in evidence that Amber's accounts of events shows a statistical tendency towards exaggeration.
I found it funny how Amber was mimicking the mannerisms of a psychologist while the psychologist explained how she copies people. Nailed it. I hope the jury sees her behavior through all of this.
What minutes?
@@farichatulchusna5182 it's in a different video of the same testimony. She acted like she was a psychologist, writing everything down and glancing up at Shannon every few seconds. It's actually scary.
LMFAO! i was just going to stop watching halfway through but bc of this comment you got me sucked into watching the 2nd half
@@browncatwithblurredbackgro2461 the psychologist is better looking too.
@@arkian8811 I thought the same thing. Shannon makes Amber feel so insecure about her intellect and appearance that Amber is literally trying to BE her in these moments.
I love the way this lady smiles whilst being attacked, because she knows her conscience is clear and she’s telling her truth. She is as clean as a whistle. Compare that with who is asking the ‘questions’ and you’ll see the difference between dignity and dogshit.
bingo
That part
So dramatic. Amber’s
Lawyer is just doing her job. That’s the way it works
@@Andrew-ch1zf while stuttering to ask questions, which is not a quite good for a lawyer
@@Andrew-ch1zf Sure, the attorney being intentionally annoying to the witness is tolerated as long as the questions ultimately serve a purpose to demonstrate proof. But this attorney failed to prove anything and was borderline impertinent. She was reaching..far far far. Muffins far.
It being "the way it works" does not mean it should stay that way. Unfortunately, justice in the way it is conducted is sometimes questionable. And anyone is right to question it. ⚖️
Objection - speculation
Judge Penney - “sustained”
Elaine with her argumentative self - “that goes to bias Your Honor”
Judge Penney “I’ll SUSTAIN the objection”
Elaine - 🤡
She is absolutely a borderline. She begged, cried, said she was going to die. One of her recurring themes was her disdain that JD left during an argument. Shes terrified of abandonment.
Yes
same i looked that up straight, BDP disorder and histriunic , they totally encompass what we can see of amber through her public displays and proofs of private recordings...
Yeah, she just so happened to diagnose her with the exact disorder that they set out for her to diagnosed with. The lawyers specifically sought her out to give a diagnosis that they wanted. The lawyer read it for everyone. That was BEFORE curry ever assessed her.
Elaine could only wish to be as professional as Dr Curry
I agree with you!!!!
I've never seen such a terrible attorney, and I'm in awe of this psychologist. She is simply great.
What makes her terrible? She has nothing to go with.. should she just give up?
@LFPRLDJJ how is lawyers' career ruined? the reality is that all clients deserve legal protection and given the weak spots of the case, they are doing a decent job
everyone who is in law and legal field will clearly see that so their professional future will not be ruined by the fact that uniformed causal commentators on youtube or elsewhere think they are not doing a good job
also to remind you, Amber already won this case in the UK, so chances are she is going to do it in the US as well
Unfortunately all attorneys are forced devil advocates, that lawyer knows her client is off her rocker
If she does win the case, which unlikely, it would only be for a technical reason, not because she's innocent, not by long stretch, what she did is criminal an this could be ground work for another suit is what iam thinking
@@sabotage7773 No, The Sun paper won a defamation case from Johnny, Heard was just a witness, this case is going much better than that one, considering the hit piece Heard posted is being proven false and actually the opposite occured, therefore defamation
Precision is the name of the game and this psychologist would not allow her words and professional opinions to be manipulated. I could watch her embarrass this attorney all day.
Professional crazymaking happens all the time
Maybe listen to the audio
@@littlepony8571not sure what either of your replies mean…
@@squarestanley I’m not sure what he’s talking about either.
Sameee
Elaine gets so gitty when the judge overrules in her favor. I’m embarrassed for her. She fumbles every single time.
I was just thinking that lol when i found your comment. Her reaction is almost child like and its like really cringey and unprofessional. I bet Camille Vasquez's facial expression would have been hilarious
Elaine seems quite childish, unprepared and just un professional.
Lol, I love how she straight up says NO on some answers and throws Elaine off 😂
Honestly though
Hilarious
This lawyer is terrible. That was a total fail to ask her if she only had 8 years experience when she had 15.
They do that on purpose in order to irritate and confuse the witness. Well, it didn't work at all with Dr. Curry...
@@mijac4685 I don't think the muffins line of attack worked either.
Dr. Curry is so educated
Bredehoft is quite literally embarrassing. They have nothing except a few 'out of context' audios, they're desperate
@@greyrock9747 Gosh, that was so ridiculous! I laughed out loud at that.
Aspiring to be this woman. The way she carry herself, the way she speaks. She's a boss 💅
Me too, and I'm a guy.
@@buksteebi it’s a shame that it’s normal and expected to say something like this on the internet, after all the progressions humanity has accomplished, wars waged, and landing on celestial bodies. sigh
@@DSX1 It was a joke, my dude. And because sarcasm and jokes can be easily misunderstood or even not realized through text, I threw in a few extra details to clarify the joke. You know, for anyone who can only take words literally. Whether they have no capability to understand sarcasm or can't determine it through text.
I'll take a crack at another joke:
It's a shame that it's normal and expected that someone will feel the need to comment about something so small and insignificant (and a joke), yet conflate it to the desolation of society. Sigh.
So, how did I do? Did I read that correctly? Did I accurately represent your comment?
She's incredible, she carries herself like a true professional.
@@DSX1 That statement is far out, dude. ✨🛰⭐️🚀💫🪐🌟🛸👽✨
This trial was wild for how it displayed the best and worst of femininity. A lying nightmare of a wife and an incompetent and unprofessional female attorney on the one hand. On the other, a collected and brilliant psychologist and a collected and brilliant attorney (Camille Vasquez).
So true 😂
The difference is the second and third wave feminism. Third wave feminism is vitriolic and insidious. Second wave is women working and accomplishing what they put their minds to, without diminishing other women who choose to be stay at home mothers, for example.
it would seems like it has nothing to do with "femininity" and these are surprisingly just general human traits not reserved for any gender
@@sedmidivka Exactly. The eagerness of men to make these statements tells you what thoughts and feelings their truly harboring for women.
@@jbernard86 Men aren't all the sane. You're projecting sexism onto others.
Bless this Clinical Psychologist. She is so professional and calm while Elaine is bullying her. I don't know how she kept her cool, but all of Johnny 's witnesses stayed cool and collected. Proof of truth!
This woman’s patience with the lawyers ignorant personality is noteworthy.
Yess She Better Person than I Lola 😅 I would have slayed that woman by NOW So Disrespectful and Freaking Rude Crude Woman Lawyer Trying to get some Funny Business Going I mean Come On is Just Plain Disrespectful to this woman's the doctors reputation and what the lawyer YES is trying to speculate is just Absurd like some funny business going on between the doctor and Depp on the sidelines WTH 😐 This lawyer is out of Line
yup. looked her dead in her eye and either agreed or disagreed. what?
Lawyer is not ignorant, she is trying to trap her which is her job. This lady tried her best but it was not her day.
100 percent It’s so ridiculous how these lawyers ask their questions with such sarcasm. And seem to always be talking down to whoever they are questioning. Gtfoh with who they think they are 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
That lawyer is wickedly good, Friend. She used the expert witness psychologist as a bounce board to refresh the jury's memory of all the times other psychologists/psychiatrists disagreed with Dr. Curry and sided with Amber as being the victim.
Her lawyer is so disrespectful she even told the judge herself “that’s not speculation.” Wow.
She is doing a demo on how to lose the case successfully lol
I've been surprised how much leeway this judge is giving Heard's team. Would love to see the same judge from the Rittenhouse trial here.
The lawyer spent so much time just trying to discredit the dr. It's ridiculous. All these asinine questions to try to catch the dr. "lying" because she knows if she starts asking about the report, it won't look good for Heard.
Oh and yes, that is speculation because that obviously isn't why you call an expert witness in to begin with. SO there's that, too.😂
I want some of the muffins in question.
I love that I can come back when ever I want an watch amber the abuser lose over an over again. Life's good.
sames!
I CONCUR VEHEMENTLY
SAME!
@@ShadyGrady3 lol my life's great thanks for asking.
Hahahah lol me too I can't stop watching this trial!!!
That chill little smile the Dr. Curry has this whole time it’s just killing me. Because she’s looking at Elaine, and you can tell that she’s just like you don’t know what you’re doing and it’s hilarious
that little smirk she has on her face the whole time like “you’re not gonna fool me” omg I love her
Yet AH smiling has everyone up in arms. You people are all over the place.
@@timothyrowland1525 It's about context and timing.
AH smirks when she's caught lying or contradicting herself and most importantly when the audio/video/photos of JD suffering at her hands streaming...
Next time you're in the mood to take an exception to something, make sure it's at least a logical one.
@@Vetrarland smugness is smugness.
Troll alert!! Fake account!! Inserted comment!!!
those attorneys tried SO hard, and yet failed so miserably. YOU DON'T CATCH A FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGIST OFF-GUARD WITH MENTAL TRICKS!
They also kind of blew their whole case at 56:30.
@@browncatwithblurredbackgro2461 so, mimicking Heard's lawyers?
@@TPRM1 that depends. This isn't a criminal trial, it's a defamation case
Forensic Psychologists are not Gods. Wise up!
@@AnymMusic Please clarify the distinction.
Perfect example of someone being totally honest. When you’re telling the truth absolutely you can’t get “tricked “. And she’s very intelligent and confident in herself. This would be an excellent role model for women, not AH
Dr. Curry was so patient. Amber Heard's team is so fitting with who she is as a person. They twist things to fit their narrative. Her lawyers were not likable at all .
TBF, thats all lawyers. Its not specific to Amber. Lawyers are being paid and so are there at all costs for their clients
@@deltaboogaloo633 right
My mum once said to me when I was a kid that lawyers have to work to defend a client even if they believe that that person is guilty. I wonder if any of Amber's lawyers started to have doubts about her when they heard some of the evidence supporting Johnny.
@@alisonwilliams4862 I think Ben Rottonborn did...Elaine just wanted to win.
It was SO frustrating when Dr. Curry asked three times to see HER OWN report in order to properly answer those questions and the lawyer IGNORED her completely. She obviously didn’t want that report shown under any circumstances.
Smh, it really irked me that she refused to give her the actual report to her just to bagger her and request things in hopes of making her look incompetent.
Exactly. Things like this gather together and give more proof of how desperate and guilty they are. They're playing dirty & unfair.
she doesn't care about the witness' answer. She's talking to the jury in the form of questions. "This other doctor believed Amber." is what she's saying but instead she has to question the witness so she says "do you recall this other doctor who believed Amber?" She's just telling the jury that all these other doctors believed Amber, that's all. "Oh that 25 page report? I don't care what you think, but what I say is this."
Good point!
@@supermelonbread good point
Muffin-gate was a big mistake for Amber's lawyer. They really showed their nasty hand too clearly. It was so obvious that the lawyer was trying to twist a completely innocent thing into seeming like something else by a technicality of word phrasing, and it really makes you distrust anything she asks for the remainder of the questioning. She's already shown that she's not above being manipulative and sneaky.
MUFFIN-GATE I LOVE THAT lol agreed
Imagine having to testify over offering a muffin...smh
Haha yeah but that’s just standard lawyer tactic to trick people into disqualifying their opinions. By asking those questions if she admitted to the slight difference of her husband buying muffins for the office instead of just giving it directly to her it would be implied she told her husband about amber, breaking confidentiality and lowering the validity of her professional opinions. Same thing with the dinner and drinks. By implying it was a casual dinner instead of an interview and getting her to go along with that it makes it seem to the juror that she was guided and bought into arriving to a conclusion of amber that sided with Johnny, instead of it just being her professional analysis. She usually doesn’t do interviews before being retained so it was an opportunity for the lawyer to make it seem that she was doing it for this case because they were convincing her into lying for them. Any of these tactics might have worked on anyone else to discredit their credibility as a witness, just not on her as she’s obviously way too experienced, intelligent and educated on how to avoid these traps of changing the verbiage to make things appear a different way. But it’s normal for lawyers to use these tactics. It’s literally their job to be manipulative at times to prove a point and make evidence appear in their clients favor. Not necessarily about being trustworthy.
@@saludosalsol true, very well phrased
@@saludosalsol yeah, I know how lawyers work. I understand it's normal. Doesn't make it any less manipulative and wrong.
“So why did your husband get the muffins for Amber Heard?”
Might be the most ridiculous sentence of this entire trial. And there were many. Of course AH heard what doctor Curry said and thought, “I’m such a celebrity, this woman’s husband bought muffins for me!!”
Lmaooooo, right?!? 😂🤣🥲
I hadn't thought of it that way. Of course. You're right. I bet that's what Amber told Elaine.
Right that's why she couldn't get the answer she thought she had . Her clint is a lier
What a sweetheart, Depp’s Lawyer legit stands up to say objection. What a respectable, decent lawyer. He’s legit my favourite 🌺
what's his name?
@@nanakwimanika Wayne Dennison
Same
"Why did your husband get the muffins for Amber Heard"
This right here just shows how ridiculous this whole examination was
It was a trap my guy, glad she avoided it
I think those questions are from amber heard too
@@thepool5783 I’m really interested in this, how was it a trap? I never picked up on that
@@miaswiftie8697 If she agreed it would mean that her husband knew that she was going to work with Amber Heard. Why is him knowing that a problem? Confidentiality
@WiLDFiRe no hubby got the muffins for his wife and only his wife, the wife merely shared them and said they have the hubby to thank for it.
“Can I clarify so we can stop talking about muffins” absolutely took me out 😂💀
I couldn't believe it , but again this lawyer like to argue with the judge.
Can I take you out?
Lollll
😂😂😂 facts!!! That had me dyingggggggg , I spit my water everywhere lol
@@JohnnyDeppIsRacist link ?
Watching Dr Curry on the stand is like witnessing a Grand Master Chess Player that can see through every move their opponent makes and knowing they will win because they are a Grand Master playing a complete amateur…… also she has truth on her side, is a complete professional, is an intelligent and composed adult human female and is committed to doing the best job she can. Elaine flusters trying to make sense of nonsense whilst Dr Curry is calm, collected and just bloody brilliant….. Women like her and Camille are role models whilst Amber and Elaine are examples of the complete opposite.
I love the little smile on her face when she sees from a mile away what Elaine will be trying to get at 😄
Dr. Curry is a boss. Amazing.
I want to smell her feet ☺️
As a mental health therapist, this psychologist is now one of my new heroes! She did amazing!
I'll bet you she's famous after this...I'm waiting on the memes...lol.
Celebrated hack. They announced her opinions in the pleading before her observation, she’s another gun for hire and a woman so you can all be blinded by the optics.
Right? This lawyer needs a visit to a psychologist though😂😂
You do know she is not board certified psychologist & also she met,Amber only twice ?
@@vandananaidu5186 she is licensed for 10 years and has been practicing for 15. what does being board certified allude to your professional approach
This women is a beast. I'd wouldn't mess with her. Composed...confident...smart...she killed it.
Not to mention easy on the eyes.
@@Ctomlinart shut up please
@@CharleenDoll just because someone is not board certified doesn’t mean they couldn’t pass the exams. Becoming board certified is OPTIONAL and usually quite a time consuming endeavor. She more than likely doesn’t feel the certification necessary.
@@CharleenDoll there are plenty of psychologists who are not board certified. What matters is if they are licensed, which she is. Way to use a red herring instead of facts. It really helps when you want people to take you seriously.
@@CharleenDoll You say you used facts, yet none of you’re “facts” were ever stated, therefore you never used facts.
You said “not that smart, couldn’t pass the board exam”. Here’s a fact for you, “not that smart” is an opinion. “Couldn’t pass the board exam”, that’s just false since she’s never taken it because she doesn’t need to. No facts in that comment.
“Why do you think depp team hired her and not a board certified psychologist or even psychiatrist?” That’s just a question, not a statement of fact.
“Because no board certified psychologist would lie under oath, they have too much to lose” what exactly is your fact here? That the only people who would never lie under oath are those who are board certified? That’s just wrong. Anybody who lies under oath has a lot to lose, fact. Let’s assume here that you are accusing her of lying under oath. You have not provided any proof that she has lied under oath, so you can’t claim any of that as fact.
Therefore, my comment was correct in saying you had not given any facts.
Now, to the “facts” you have SINCE commented.
“I do use facts” no you didn’t.
“They hired none board certified psychologist” probably the only real fact you have given and it’s completely pointless because many people hire licensed psychologist who aren’t board certified. She is still an expert in her field, her PsyD is proof of that, as well as all of her education and experience. Well done, you’ve finally given us a fact.
“Why didn’t they go for the best, like board certified psychiatrist, to get accurate results?” Again, that’s a question not a statement of fact. BUT let’s go with the “fact” you’re trying to make. You claim that only the best, a board certified psychologist (which, again is an opinion as someone without board certification can be better than someone who is board certified, since not everyone has taken the exam) can get accurate results. Where is your proof? Until then, your “fact” is just a claim.
“You are trying to discredit my comment” yeah, and I succeeded. Congrats, another fact.
“All of these facts add up to: in order to defend johnny depp a lot of people have to lie” literally nothing you have said adds up to that. Even if, and you have yet to provide proof for said claim, people have lied for Johnny Depp, nothing you said adds up to that.
“That’s a strange thing to occur while dealing with an honest good man” … again, that’s an opinion. Opinions are not facts.
I guess it's not surprising that Amber's team was running out of time by the end, considering how much time was wasted in these cross examinations. The only thing Elaine Bredehoft demonstrated is her inability to understand simple concepts.
While speaking down to others. 🙄 What a bore.
Dr. CURRY what a pleasure meeting you. Profesional, educated, thorough, respectful...this is someone that presents facts and science.
She must’ve been mentally exhausted after this. She did a great job, she knew the game AH’s lawyers were playing in trying to trick her into saying something she didn’t mean. She had to be on the ball and cautious in answering the whole time. She did amazing 👏🏻
Even I am mentally drained after that, and I'm just a bystander. All those excessively long questions that sound so similar with just a tiny detail changing each time...
Agreed. The entire cross-examination section was just torture. I'd rather sit and write a 4 hour essay exam than go through cross-examination questioning with lawyers like Amber Heard's team.
Guys…I think Dr.Curry never felt intimidated by AH’s lawyer!! The lawyer is a low grade, incompetent ambulance chaser! Dr. Curry on the other hand was cool, professional, not a single drop of sweat on her forehead!! Heard and the crazy woman lawyer are two peas in the same pod!!
Yes, a big mistake on AH's team. This is a highly qualified and very experienced Dr. in psychology, you can't fool her with tricks, twist her words, or outsmart her.
@@katego370 Kate….Dr.Curry is a phenom that blew into town!
It's pretty easy to stick to telling the truth, even under immense pressure. This woman does us all proud. I can imagine that her phone is blowing up!
Yesss!
@Ria Zanelli I'll get back to you on that.
@Ria Zanelli she has a private Instagram!
Good on her she deserves it 👏
@Ria Zanelli that is very weird. Why would you do that? Nobody in this case has anything to do with you.
What a gripping cross exam, almost an hour of "do you remember this person saying something that you probably don't agree with"
Dr Curry is a true professional. Elaine is an absolute mess. The way she barks out questions is just rude. I understand the context of cross examination but still she comes off as needlessly confrontational. Dr Curry is cool calm and remained unrattled in her responses. It’s such a pleasure to watch such a strong professional woman doing her work in such an artful way. Dr Curry, well done!!! 🙏👍🙏
This psychologist is fantastic. She doesn't let the badgering questions from counsel rattle her. And the lawyer's condescension is abhorrent. If I didn't know anything about psychology, I'd still get how ridiculous this cross examination is. I actually am a psychologist, so I was in awe at how deftly this expert witnessed handled this cross examination. She's excellent.
When the lawyer said bipolar instead of borderline 🤦♀️ and articles keep saying Amber says she was never diagnosed with bipolar disorder... Wrong disorder ma'am. Agree with you!
How was the lawyer condescending? Surely she was only doing her job? The line of questioning was no different to many, many other cases that I’ve seen. I would have said that was standard cross-examination. And the judge would have intervened if the questioning was too aggressive or inappropriate. But sure, the witness handled it admirably.
Same. I'm also a psychologist (in research, not clinical), and I had to pause the video so many times to try and figure out what the lawyers were trying to ask. There were so many double negatives, long questions, and compound questions. Mad respect to Dr. Curry for being able to catch all of that and answer them all so quickly and correctly.
Correct me if I'm wrong but was Amber's attorney seriously trying to discredit her simply because she hasn't testified on specific mental disorders? What does this matter if she has 15 years experience and has diagnosed hundreds of people?
@@torijake822 right?!?! As someone in the psychology field I was infuriated
Dr. Shannon Curry has got to be the most patient psychologist in the world.
Love her!! She’s a pro
Nailed everything about Amber that’s a fact!!! Dead on, great job flawless ev-vol
but she's not the most patient, she's the most doctor *bad dum tss*
@@bboyhanvzla I actually laughed at this. You made my day with your joke!
right at the start when she's basically being accused of not actually doing her job, just wow. how she didn't get mad, its inspirational.
Everyone who testified in this case is so patient with Amber's lawyers.
Elaine is incredibly abrasive and unprofessional. Even more so against Dr. Curry.
Dr Currie is unflappable because she's armed with integrity and is a true expert in her field. I have such respect for her knowledge about what these tests indicate, keeping them all in their categories!
"It says *perpetrated* but other than that, yes" -- she's great and that makes the lawyer stumble all over the place
At least the lawyer doesn't say 'perpetuator' instead of perpetrator. The psychologist who doesn't own a hairbrush did.
@@thinkingallowed7042 if thinking is allowed, please do so before commenting 🤣
@@thinkingallowed7042 perpetuator
(pəˈpɛtjʊˌeɪtə)
n
someone who or something that perpetuates
@@thinkingallowed7042 the psychologist who doesn’t own a hairbrush has more brains, ethics, class, education, articulacy, sophistication, professionalism and honesty in a strand of hair than abuser Amber and her slimebag attorneys put together.
@@thinkingallowed7042 objection ! Relevancy ?
This lawyer is rude and nasty. This psychologist is a human and should be spoken to with respect.
So nasty.. the amount of times I got mad because of the questions and over talking her after asking her the question 🤦♀️
Nahhh she’s just doing your job, (btw I don’t support amber just saying)
Would love to hear the Dr's evaluation of the solicitor. I'm sure she came up with one during this.
Depp gets one of his favorite MILF GFs to be an expert witness (in his employ). LOL.
A human who has had birds nesting in her hair for weeks, maybe you should wash your brainwashed head too..?
can't believe they bully her into reciting her report perfectly by memory as a way to make her seem incompetent, and picking apart her research without actually bringing it up in evidence
Its been over a year since this trial.....but every time I start to get stressed out about some situation in my life, I come back to this clip and watch. It allows me to compare professional thought and response, and acting out of panic and/or anger. I've been counseled by a Dr. who has never been within a thousand miles of me.
Can we get Dr. Curry her own tv show? She is professional, courteous and truthful. Plus she explains material that most people don't know in layperson terms.
My thoughts exactly...I would definitely watch... especially of she had good content creation team.
I was thinking the same thing
jealous of her husband, women of that calibur feel so rare these days. he's gotta be up there as well to catch her discerning eye.
When would she sleep?!😅 That is one very smart, busy, productive lady!!!
People like her don't need tv shows. They're doing real work.
Dr. Shannon Curry seems very much the standard of a woman I would have aspired to be as a child. Brilliant composure, wonderful expertise, and astonishing witness duty.
@@amandasummers7881 yes. She's a very attractive woman. Lmao, I'd love to see Johnny with her. They'd make a great couple!!
@@amandasummers7881 That’s alright girl, I’ve been thinking that this whole time.
@@amandasummers7881 I was thinking the same plus she has access to muffins👍🤣
I STILL aspire to be like her. It's never too late, right?
I can dream. 😂
@@amandasummers7881 Deeper than just her face in terms of being hot af, there's something about how totally assertive and absolutely conversationally dominant she is consistently without ever coming off as rude or unlikable at any point that is just a deeply attractive trait to have.
Best way to trip up a bad lawyer is to ask them to repeat a question because it doesn't make sense or that you don't understand the question because it doesn't make sense , it works like a charm
this is my favorite testimony to watch! The therapist is so neutral, factual and calm; its like the lawyers are trying to teach her about her own subject of expertise.
Dr. Shannon Curry is a BOSS. she was so professional, calm, confident, very articulate and classy whilst being attacked by those lawyers who could not succeed on twisting the truth. she’s amazing ✨
Intelligent and Beautiful too! Your honor she must be guilty…. Of stealing all our hearts
@@TheCrazeTaker She's definitely a very beautiful woman, and she comes off all the more attractive because of her confidence, professionalism, and the extremely high intelligence that's clearly coming through when she's answering these questions and avoiding the attorneys attempts to steer her answers and/or trip her up by any means possible - she was absolutely the intellectual superior in the exchanges between Ms Heard's counsel and herself...and it wasn't very close in my opinion.
Edit: By the way...that was an extremely cheesy joke, brother 😂 Just needed to make that quick point here✌️
She won’t be short of work after the performance she gave, I imagine she is fully booked & unavailable for the foreseeable future at this point
yeeaaa. the BOSS is what dr. Curry is.
@@JohnnyDeppIsRacist I visited your channel and found no such video, why not post the link here in this thread.
As a mental health professional, this cross exam is infuriating. A client reporting something to a therapist isn't the same as catching it on a tape. In general, students of mental health are trained to approach clients with unconditional positive regard, non-judgemental, and maintaining rapport. I have had several clients that I had feelings were exaggerating or straight up lying to me. But as Dr. Curry said, we aren't investigators. We don't interrogate. We treat. We listen. We empathize. And we gently and tactfully challenge any inconsistency in thought patterns and/or behavior that may be contributing to symptoms. The fact that a client reports something does not make it true. They are not under oath in our office. And truth or falsehood isn't the point/focus when working with a therapist. We try to find the underlying circumstances and emotional meaning to the client and use it for treatment. Clients who make false reports of something in therapy is usually a manifestation of the very disorder or struggle they are trying to treat/work through.
Thank you for the wonderful explanation! Thank you for being a true professional.
I love this comment! ♥️ Beautifully put!
Well said!!! ❤️❤️
All of this!!!!
You're misunderstanding.
The point is to ascertain certain facts from the psychologist's recall.
When she gets it wrong, the lawyer directs her to the paper that explicitly shows what the psychologist said.
This evidence, plus everything else, will come to a certain truth that the lawyers fight out over to 'prove'.
You're muddling up the roles. The psychologist is there to state facts. The cross-examination is fair. . . Don't be offended.
This lady remained calm through out the entire cross examination. Meanwhile amber's witnesses are mad on the very first question 😹
"Did I read that correctly?"
"Uh, it says 'perpetrated,' but other than that, yes." LMAO
“Your husband got you muffins because he knew amber was coming isn’t that correct”
*Psychologist explains the entire reason why her husband bought the muffins*
10 minutes later….
……. “So why did your husband buy the muffins?”
This woman I can’t
No good muffin goes unpunished
Time stamp?
@@smexy65 20-30 min mark
@@smexy65 24:45
I want muffins.
I was so nervous watching Dr. Curry live, fearing that she might fall into one of the traps setup by the lawyer, but she didn't. She was amazing! Edit: Thanks for 3k likes ya'll! I don't think I've ever gotten that many!
What sort of traps?
She is great. I learned so much from her. She's like a teacher. Gr8 lecture on the stand, up for Depp 🦜💗
@@net173h Traps as in quoting all the false allegations Heard made to third parties years ago and trying to make it look like Dr Curry was agreeing with them now. You know, those kind of traps?
What traps?
Excellent!!
Wow I actually feel sorry for Elaine here. She is in wayyyy over her head! I think my belief in psychology as an effective and necessary science has been reenforced. My degree is in psychology and I didn’t realize it could be this powerful. Dr. Curry is a rockstar.
No Elaine is looking for her fee. The blatant evidence against the defendant is more than credible. Ambers lawyers and witnesses should be more ashamed
Reinforced
I don't feel bad for Elaine. In over her head or not, she was unnecessarily rude at times towards dr. Curry, but that's my opinion
I see a brilliant, highly competent, talented professional who worked pretty hard to get where she is at being ill treated by Elaine. Dr. Shannon handled herself beautifully. She knows her stuff, and she presents her conclusions with confidence and reliable scientific knowledge.
*Dr. Curry is clearly worth her entire weight in solid gold.*
*She conveyed complicated psychiatric terms and conditions beautifully!* 👏🏻👏🏻
True
Elisa Martinelli she said she did ? And how could she get an mmpi-2 exam ??
@@elisamartinelli7676 She met Amber and had sessions with her. Was said in the video multiple times
@@elisamartinelli7676 never met but did psychological testing with Amber? Are you a bot or something? or did we not just watch the exact same video? Unless maybe you didn’t take the time to watch the ENTIRE video?
@@elisamartinelli7676 also, a real estate agent is still relevant and plenty qualified even while not being a “Realtor”
This psychologist is strong, and so bright. She is not letting AH’s lawyers twist and turn her testimony into ANY bullsh++ , whatsoever!
She is a psychologist.
Not true, I think ambers lawyer masterfully brings out her bias towards Johnny. Not saying Amber is innocent but her testimony won’t matter much
True, opening so early with a question about Johnny Depp and if she /knows/ him because she's seen a number of his movies and tv shows. I only know of them because of his movie roles and the media reporting about him and Amber, don't think I've ever seen the TV show with him. "And you think he's a good actor?" 🤣 What, is she supposed to lie and say "no" because he's been hired for decades because of how much he sucks?
@@alphaomega9873 are you one of AHs lawyers? Because you seem to ignore her clarifications as much as they do. She clearly says she didn't have dinner or drinks with him, it was an interview where food and drinks were provided (not unreasonable after 4 hours). She had muffins with AH, how biased does eating those make her?
@@alphaomega9873 you are making a grave error by not realizing that every question from the lawyer is a loaded question (as it should be). The Dr is forced to clarify and correct part of the question based on her own truth. That can mean that she is lying or she is biased but it can also mean that the question is asked in such a way to illicit a response that would alter the truth. Proof of the latter is the large number of objections that were sustained by the judge.
Dr Shannon Curry is my favourite witness from this trial she's amazing
It's absolutely ridiculous how unprofessional Elaine is. How she was ever even considered to be a partner is baffling to me
Amber Heard’s attorney is mixing up “Borderline Personality Disorder” and “Bipolar Disorder”. They’re not the same thing!
I noticed that too, bpd is a personality disorder and bipolar is a mood disorder, the attorney was nasty anyway
Exactly 💯
Exactly, it's clear he doesn't have a clue on the difference.
Maybe he needs therapy! He will after this case
She doesn’t even know how to pronounce arnica cream and what are it’s benefits, I am not surprised she doesn’t know the differences between these two states above.
This is basically an hour of Ms. Heard's lawyer asking Dr. Curry if she remembers events that never took place in an effort to confuse her.
lol well put.
"did your husband buy muffins for Ms. Heard? He did buy muffins? Yes, case closed"
@@matth2283 lmaoooo I was just watching that and wondering…. Why won’t his lawyers just ask what her point is?!? Asking about muffins. Jesus.
WRONG
In an effort to confuse the jury. This is all about the jury.
Yesssss !!! Love how many times she tells the attorney.... No that's not correct 😂😂
I still can’t with Elaine’s pronunciation of “Vasqwezzz”
The difference between Curry, Depp’s expert psychologist and Heard’s expert Hughes ( with her 4 page “cheat sheet”) is staggering. Curry’s testimony was informative and professional while Hughes testimony was biased and gossipy. Wow. Once Heard’s testimony matched Curry’s description of her diagnosis this trial was essentially done.
"No, it's the most researched." Wow, you can feel the power in the pause. She just refuted heard's lawyers entire argument before she began.
I know ! What a brilliant response !....taking the opportunity to justify her decision to use the less recent tests....she slammed the gates shut on any further discussion on the issue, and made the lawyer look rather silly, because clearly, not using the most up to date version was going to be used against Dr Curry... absolutely masterful !
Lawyer: It's not the most recent MMPI is it?
Psychologist: No, it's the most researched.
Absolutely brilliant! 👏👏👏
Timestamp?
@@chilliflakes4968 58:06
Yes that had weight I thought.
This lawyer is not doing herself any favors by being so combative and aggressive.
Yeah, she is she did rise her voice just to intimidate the forensic psychologist. Nah, not all will fall to that trap strategy.
She is in a way, looking to take the mule for a kick. 🐮. It is insane
She seems a little deranged.
@@ziggypop8106 😂😂😂😂
They are desperate at this point.
"So we can stop talking about the muffins..." Best trial line ever! Around 27:00 or so.
It was 25:00,but yes I loved the way she tore Elaine up and I also loved the 22:50 when she tried to prove bias but fell flat on her face😂😂😂
Even better after that when Elaine comes back and simply says again WHY DID YOUR HUSBAND BUY MUFFiNS FOR AMBER HEARD?
I laughed hard.
This video is an example of someone who thinks they are smart, irritating someone who is.