Acts 1:6, Acts
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 09. 2024
- Explains how Acts 1:6 and Acts 3:21 support the Old Testament teaching of a future restoration of the nation Israel in connection with the second coming of Jesus.
Get info on Michael Vlach's new video course, "Biblical Eschatology: What the Bible Teaches about Future Events. " For more info on this course click here: www.michaeljvl...
For info on Michael's books go to www.michaeljvl...
It’s odd how easy this is if you just take the Bible how it reads. Words have meaning. Well done sir.
Outstanding again. Bravo
Terrific video Sir. I find the method of simply presenting the texts and allowing them to speak quite persuasive.
Thank you!
Thanks for your work. Question about the transfiguration passage: Doesn’t Matthew 7:12 kind of suggest that Elijah already did come (John the Baptist) and the Jews did not know him? It seems to suggest the opportunity was there but the prophecy didn’t play out because of the unbelief at the time. Your point about Matthew 17:11 and Malachi makes sense on its own, but leaving out Matthew 17:12, the very next verse, would clear a lot of that up imo.
What am I missing?
Some of our elders would say that the restoration has been fulfilled after the Jews were brought back from the Babylonian captivity. How would you respond to that?
There has been no complete and permanent restoration yet. Plus, there are promises of restoration after the return from Babylon. No way the return from Babylon at that time fulfilled all the great promises linked with Israel's restoration to Abrahamic Covenant blessings.
Hi Dr. Vlach. Thank you for making these videos! I have been enjoying them and learning a lot from it. I am wondering if you're able to cover a topic on Joshua 21:43-45 and Nehemiah 9:22-24 regarding the land that God promised to give to His people. Based on those texts, covenant theologians argue that God already fulfilled His promise in giving the physical land to Israel, so there's no more land promise to be given to the Jews in the future. So, I am wondering how you and other dispensationists defend that claim that there's still a land promise to be fulfilled in the future.