NEW Social Media Censorship Law Will KILL Creators
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 15. 09. 2021
- The new Texas social media censorship bill purports to protect Free Speech in Big Tech social media platforms. Governor Greg Abbott has gone so far as to say the social media censorship should end, and we need to regulate Big Tech. But does this new social media censorship law really protect you and me? In today's video, I detail what's wrong with the new social media censorship law, and I show what future laws should say to protect Creators' right to Free Speech online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHECK OUT My đ°CZcams LAW RULES â VIDEOS - CLICK HERE âĄïž: âą NEW CZcams Copyright ...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHECK OUT My âïžVIDEO GAME LEGAL RULES âïž VIDEOS - CLICK HERE âĄïž: âą Video
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The content of this CZcams channel is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. You should not rely upon any information contained on this CZcams channel for legal advice. Viewing this CZcams channel is not intended to and shall not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Ian Corzine or West Corzine, LLP. Messages or other forms of communication that you transmit to this CZcams channel will not create an attorney-client relationship and thus information contained in such communications may not be protected as privileged. Neither Ian Corzine nor West Corzine, LLP makes any representation, warranty, or guarantee about the accuracy of the information contained in this CZcams channel or in links to other CZcams channels or websites. This CZcams channel is provided "as is," does not represent that any outcome or result from viewing of this channel. Your use viewing of this CZcams channel is at your own risk. You enjoy this CZcams channel and its contents only for personal, non-commercial purposes. Neither Ian Corzine, West Corzine, LLP, nor anyone acting on their behalf, will be liable under any circumstances for damages of any kind.
© 2021 Ian Corzine. All rights reserved.
#freespeech #censorship #iancorzine - VÄda a technologie
Do you have any suggested clauses to include in future laws designed to protect Creators' Free Speech right?
As long as the user is not directly targeting anyone else negatively to insight unfair treatment or inflict (unnecessary) harm or stir chaos and break a country's laws, then users should be able to talk about whatever they desire.
This upcoming law for the Internet doesnât work to stop the cancel culture. đ€Šđ»ââïž
yes, that any calls for sensitivity to be largely ignored if not outright admonished because parody and jokes and even facts must in large part be protected no less than any other speech. the missplaced patronizing of trying to protect women, minorities, and et cetera from the harmful effects of speech has left a chilling blow to not only comedy but also to free speech at every turn. as terrible as hate speech is, hate speech cannot does not exist in a legal context of the united states. because that would imply someone having the ability and capacity to decide what speech is ok or not and in what context or not. this would defeat the very idea of the first amendment and be illegal if the government were to do it. it would be a loophole and be defacto breaking of the first amendment if a large private entity were to do it.
one cannot play favorites, one cannot play taste police. I dare say not even the consumer should do that either unless they're opposing censorship.
Freedom isn't Free
Freedom is slavery. War is peace . Ignorant is strength.
I SO agree! as an artist i am no longer allowed because of social media censorship to make a living as an artist
What Free speech? That's long gone in most social media already..
Youâre right, it wonât survive a challenge.
Thank you for your work Ian! đ
I preferred the old internet. It was the wild west, but at least it was an even playing field.
That was the problem with the Wild west, people kept doing what they wanted and living free, you know not paying taxes and all that. governments & corporations hate wild things
yes please bring it back.
I know right? Miss it so much..
Can't the old CZcams come back ?
@@KiraReminiec9399 I dont think so. CZcams is evolving into what is essentially an entertainment channel. The most likely scenario is that some other unregulated, decentralised platform will come along and become the dominant player in the market place.
I agree . So glad you have our backs.
Wow This is scary! Thanks for sharing!
Itâs getting crazy.
Dude, I said this Freedom of speech has been gone CZcams started it years ago. We all know what creator to think for this.
Or just tell the state of Taxes take hike the gov of Taxes blocked me on twitter after i told him how i feel about his laws glad i don't live in that state of hell
The problem with this video is that weâve never really had any form of free speech online. Back in the late 90s with Yahoo, until now with Facebook.., social media had strict rules that we had to follow.
Thats true BUT because we've given social platforms so much power, we've allowed them to be our primary means of civil discourse -- social media is not just a fad now -- it's daily communication to which Freedom of Expression should attach
Thanks for the info.
Gregg Abbot needs to go.
This may lead to a mob mentality.
Iâm confused. How is this harmful. Because social media platforms will feel more emboldened to restrict content?
Yeah you're right.
Speaking of this law, is there any update with KOSA? I'm surprised I haven't seen you talk about it yet. Being a 'horror story channel' I can see it affecting mine with the way one person described it because I tell spooky, scary horror stories and I certainly don't make them for kids although I'm sure free range children might watch because their parents aren't paying attention so the gvt has to do it for them. Sigh. Please, when you get the time, do an update on this. I searched for KOSA on your channel but it came up with videos older than the bill. Thanks
Another solution in search of a problem
Hmmmm
Tell Texas
Good information thanks
Let's go, Ian! Where are the people that stand together against these laws and enforce revisions on them in favor for them to make them more fair? Social media isn't just government; the majority of the service is used by the majority if society. Where are there inputs for these matters?
Thanks Ian!
These laws have nuggets of good ideas but are so prone to abuse. Ugh
I certainly agree... Also at some point this censorship will (if it hasnât already) bring about the slow demise of the unfair big tech when a fair competitor can finally become popular enough to outgrow the competition. Or will the the newcomer just get âcancelledâ in a fight over a media monopoly?!! As far as clauses go, I think that the Bill of Rights should be âclauseâ enough... Or at least yaâd think, right?!!
Freedom of speech is the most important freedom. Is there any work by anybody to make rules such as you explained ? đŽđŽ Aloha
Isnât there anything we can do to stop this?
Hope to get our messages heard although knowing the higher ups on CZcams, our criticism will fall on deaf ears.
@@Turbulation1 Well⊠there might be one way we can get our message across. We may have to write letters of complaint to Google and tell them what we want and when we want it. (And by âletters,â I mean physical letters, not email.) Itâs not a surefire solution, but itâs better than none. All we need is Google HQâs mailing address and weâre good to go.
So now I am confused , I had a channel of 117 subscribers which got terminated , so I decided to create another channel and started posting there but it also got terminated . Then I appealed to youtube for the second termination and then they gave back my 1st and 2nd channel both . Now what should I do ? Continue with the 2nd one or dele the 2nd one and start again in the 1st one?
YT's more recent option to upload privately, give them 2 hours before making it public to allow YT time to, "highlight," a video to bring you more views is a despicable & deceptive way of making sure your videos pass their system checks points. Deception & manipulation is what comes to mind. It's time to find a platform that follows the laws against censorship CZcams!
Amazing videođ
Here is an idea have susan step down
YES THANK YOU!
Yes the 1st amendment and fining CZcams for censorship treat them as a publisher they act accordingly.
I always know that I usually develop gaming content that's within federal laws of the USA, by rating. I would never provide cancel content at all, but if all content is provided, I'll do anything to livestream under rules, and algorithm. What I think, Texas is trying to do, is to simply target music creators, when in reality, provides cancel content in the present day; which kinda reminds me of another person I used to subscribe to.
I totally disagree. The content must be regulated by the social media and the state for a very simple reason: the platforms belong to social media and your life and politics belong ultimate to the state/collective. The freedom of expression is protecting only the people supporting the current regime or the people that do the dirty job for the current regime. Personally I am against this form of control, but as a citizen I learned and lived that freedom of expression does not exist, unless you are ready to sacrifice yourself, for that second of freedom.
Back to watch TV then? well we need to be more careful about what we are saying on the net as well as in real life gladly i won't be talking during my CZcams career so yeah just gaming and nothing else even though i don't use hate speech,i am not racist,and i hate spread negative vibes i just wanna give love and take love from my viewers in the future but i feel like being mute is my best way of success although i like speaking/chatting but with this new law i better make a retreat and everyone might be happy
A social media platform, even a web host, in the United States cannot offer their customers / users true freedom of expression online because of section 230 of the communications decency act, as part of its safe harbour provisions require operators to take down illegal material.
When has talking about the pandemic on Social Media becone illegal ?
@@KiraReminiec9399 Re-watch the video, he was saying companies should offer creators / users *total freedom of expression*. They cannot, because the CDA requires that platform operators take down illegal content (such as copyright infringing material, CSAM media, terrorist propaganda, etc.) in order to remain protected from liability for the slanderous/libellous content users may post.
Out of curiosity, what law(s) would you design that you believe would help freedom of speech online if you could draft and pass such laws?
Why does Texas always have to be America's lolcow? Well, one of them, anyway... (Looking at you, Florida!)
Iâm confused. Isnât free speech only for protecting citizens against suppression from the government? A private enterprise has the right to decide what to allow/ disallow on their own platformâŠso free speech is involved how?
The goverment is using Big Tech to do the dirty work of censuring for them, and in exchange Big Tech gets immunity so they can kill the competition. Remember Parlor? Constitution is a paper you can wipe ass with at this point and not much else. America is not a constitutional republic, its a corrupt banana republic. And Big Banks, Big Pharma, Big Tech, etc are in bed with goverment. So old school play book is not something you can play by. New rules are about opposition public/private partnership. Crony Capitalism 2.0. Capitalism with American Characteristics. Fascism, Communism, call it what you will but Rule of law - a principle under which all persons, institutions, and entities are accountable to laws for ensuring an orderly and just society.... does not apply under new terms of services. The new rule is golden rule. He who has the gold, makes the rules.
CZcams isn't a private entity
Ian, will this new social media law kill the legit medical channels ,such as Dr.Campbell & Zoe ?
I agree with you đđ
All videos must be Party Approved Correct Thinking and Speech
Anothe great vid.
Lobbyists maybe. Money talks perhaps. Dunno. Just my opinion. No evidence.
sidestep deprioritizing by advertising your videos on facebook. American business is subordinate to federal free speech.
Yeah! [hehe]
Online freedom left with Elon Musk's latest rocket.
The TX law does the exact opposite, it's to protect the content creator from being unfairly taken down... not sure why youâre saying the opposite???
liked video