*👉Submit your Dashcam video for the feature:* forms.gle/FnavwQg5WwkNkS6r8 *👉Or sent to Email:* megadrivingschoolyt@gmail.com *👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*czcams.com/video/EBHxyTG0txM/video.html *👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*czcams.com/video/nhOQi5p2eEI/video.html *👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*czcams.com/video/lmXA166yMFk/video.html *👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*czcams.com/video/IqI9p4F9F5A/video.html *👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*czcams.com/video/-B3h1siKnYY/video.html
#16 - I'm not interested in reading political opinions of any stripe in captions of a dashcam compilation. If I want some random bozo's political opinion - whatever it is - there are plenty to be found on youtube. I'm here for the idiots in cars. Please do a better job of editing those captions.
8:10 what dumb caption. Was he towing something? doesnt change the illegal turn the other car made, the cammer tried to slow but a car went on a red and drove in his path, the cammer is not at fault legally or in any way, He had a green light, he had right of way, he was in his lane, PERIOD, the other car had a red, the other failed failed to yield to traffic, made an unsafe turn and caused a wreck, to literally and try and blame the victim is insane
All too many times we hear the narrator trying to spread the blame around. Maybe he works for an insurance company in the "deny every claim" department.
I wanted to make a similar comment. Probably the cammer was not expecting the car to go forward at this point. In any case it is the gray suv that was not paying attention. And I agree MDS sometimes add irrelevant comments.
#25 please explain how the commentary blames the cammer for someone turning right on a RED light in front of them. In what world would the cammer be at fault when someone pulls out in front of them? Pay more attention? Stop faster? If you blame the cammer, go turn in your license. No more driving for you.
The commentary has gotten ridiculous on some of these channels. There are enough self-righteous cammers out there submitting clips, they don't need to blame the innocent ones as well.
Agreed. I got into a similar accident (I made the right on red) and it was my fault for going w/o checking if the traffic was clear. Same thing applies here. If you're coming from a secondary road (the exit ramp) to a primary road and you get into an accident turning into the primary road, you're at fault.
time stamp please, makes it easy to get to your clip. You see, another viewer need only press the blue letters to get there where as what you left everybody was a search for the relevant location in the video.
@@peterhineinlegen4672 I give a thumbs down to every MDS video I watch. Used to be a subscriber and give thumbs up every time...don't know what happened to MDS.
@MegaDrivingSchool -- if you dont have enough submissions to make a full video, it's ok not to post for a day. A lot of the videos with the blurred dates are repeats...well played, but still noticeable.
#14 4:31 (1) Cammer is following too closely. (2) Cammer changes lanes before the lines allow it. (3) Cammer tries to pass someone immediately after a lane change. People do not have eyes in the back of their head. So after a lane change you need to wait a few seconds so those in front of you (via occasional glances in their mirrors) can become aware you've changed lanes. Then you can do things (like passing) which put you within collision distance of them. (4) Cammer tries to pass on the right. Which isn't illegal in the U.S., but it's much riskier than passing on the left. So you need to be extra cautious when doing it. Edit: For completeness I guess I should add. (5) Car in front doesn't signal before changing lanes. (6) Car in front slows down before changing lanes, when there's no need. But I still think most of the fault still lies with cammer.
@@steveroyer1628 VA 46.2-841 2. Legal to pass on right on a highway with unobstructed pavement, not occupied by parked vehicles, of sufficient width for two or more lines of moving vehicles in each direction. It's legal in almost all 50 states. The only one I know of that is restricted is CT, and that's a restriction applied to two lane highways (i.e. 95 east of New London to RI, Merrit, etc...). 3 or more, OK to do.
This channel has really fallen off. I come here for the cammer commentary, not you being biased and blaming the cammers for accidents that they were not at fault for. If the submitter didn't say anything, then don't add any commentary! Simple as.
@@gregrod4489 I watch many other dashcam channels and they all just stick to cammer commentary. Sure you can sprinkle jokes in, but blaming a cammer (and not just in this video, it's been done at least a few times previously) even if they're not at fault is just absurd and makes me not want to watch this channel.
There’s nothing wrong with commenting that the cammer was at fault if the cammer was at fault. In most of these videos it’s fairly obvious who’s at fault.
I'm curious whether that question is directed towards the driver of the car or the truck. It looked to me like the car was slowing way down unnecessarily just to screw with the trucker and then continued by cutting in front of the trucker without signaling when the trucker tried to avoid rear-ending the car.
True-dat, besides, how does she even know the rally was "racist" anyway? Been to a few of them myself in my city, never saw any of this supposed "racism" that they love to scream about. Then again, saw plenty of that at BLM riots (oops, sorry meant to say "peaceful protests").
@1:02 how slow do you think he should've been traveling? Really can't stop on a dime when someone decides to cut you off then slam on their brakes. lol
@@pazuzu7119 He almost wrecked the white suv as well by jumping in front of it and slamming on his brakes. White SUV changed lanes rather than losing the braking battle.
@@pazuzu7119Slow enough that if the car infront of you stops you can also* Not slow enough to stop if ANY RANDOM car moves suddenly into your lane. Are you expecting people to just drive around at literally 10 or less? What a stupid comment wow.
@anniellusion Exactly. Slow enough so that you can stop in an emergency. But don't take my word for it. Not only have I been driving on snow and ice for 50 years, but apparently I'm also stupid. Nothing like getting driving advice from millennials!
0:24 Here in Germany it is forbidden to stop within 15 feet of a crosswalk. The cammer was also not careful enough, as he could not see into the crosswalk because of the van.
If the cammer couldn't see those wide white lines painted on the roadway, or is unable to comprehend what they mean, maybe he heeds either a seeing eye dog while driving, or shouldn't be driving at all. Also, being as he was on a narrow residential street to begin with, why was he stepping into the throttle that hard? And out of curiosity, where, exactly, in a densely populated city, do you expect a delivery truck of any kind to park? I'd wager that no one commenting on here complains when the trucks stop in the roadway to deliver their orders. Or do you all have specially designated parking spots in front of each home just for them to park in?
1:58 Driver saves it like a champ and then looks stupid as they sit there in wonderment. As soon as it's back under control, hit the gas and finish up looking like a pro that did it on purpose.
#16 First time I heard of a near crash and following too close blamed on a political candidate. This is what they mean by Trump Derangement Syndrom(TDS) where everything in your life revolves around a political candidate you dislike.... sheesh... Opps, forgot to add your added comment that it was 'racist' too .... of course...
0:18 Clip 2 - IMHO it's either the illegally parked UPS truck or traffic laws that could have made this safer. Here in UK it's against the law [although some will flout it] to park blocking [or near] a pedestrian crossing - there has to be clear unobstructive view. I couldn't blame the runner or dashcammer if an accident happened.
@@bobroberts2371 IF you think otherwise, please don't drive again. In your hypothetical, if the line of site is clear and the cammer, in a residential area, runs over a pedestrian in a cross-walk then the cammer would absolutely be at fault.
@@kaylaschuler6918there is a point where the Pedestrian does not have Right of Way, in this case the Pedestrian did not as the car was in the intersection
Cammer might be like me and not give 2 f*cks. They’ve got the row and will own your a** in court. Lesson here? Wait your f*cking turn to change lanes and be more patient. You’re welcome!
Just bad driving. I was in New Braunfels last summer to go to Schlitterban and there is always traffic like this. People just following too closely and not paying attention.
I live near NB and these TDS infected individuals are all around. They blame everything on him. They think they’re funny but everyone else thinks they’re on the spectrum. Adreno is obviously just as daft. Traffic is always like this especially in the fast lane.
5:21 - comment from creator. So let's get this correct - *DT holds a rally in Texas so it must be racist? * I'm done here....no my one view will not make a difference to here - jeez I doubt my comment will stay here but at least I now know and don't ever need to return.
Actually the majority of these commentaries are from the videos themselves, or from the people who submitted them. However, I do feel that the channel creator needs to keep that crud out of it.
#13 4:17 Another perfect example of why one needs a dashcam. Drivers thinking that they can change over multiple lanes without out regard for other drivers just because their signal was on. #14 4:36 Cannot wait until the "blind-spot" comments. That vehicle was getting over and the "Trucker" was trying to block them. Another CDL bites the dust. #20 6:34 And another CDL bites the dust. Add in hit-and-run charges. #27 8:42. Go go now and use "zipper-merge" method to exit. You must stop and let me.
Racism = assuming people have certain traits just because of their race "Racist Trump rally" = assuming people have certain traits just because they attend a Trump rally On an abstract level, they're the same thing. Then as a bonus, submitter automatically attributes a random bad event that happens to Trump supporters, when there is absolutely nothing to suggest that.
5:02 for those that are unaware, the rule of thumb for police when deciding who to pull over when there’s multiple vehicles committing violations is this: for speeding, whoever is “leading the pack, setting the pace/flow of traffic” or in front, will be pulled over. For red light violations: If there happen to be two or more people who follow each other through a red light, whoever is in the rear, thereby being the one who ran the red the longest amount of time after it turned red, is pulled over. So if you wanna speed, just wait for someone else who’s already speeding to pass, and let them be your “bait” or “blocker” For the red lights, just don’t run em. But if you do, only do it if you somehow know the guy behind you will follow. After making sure it’s safe to do so and only in exigent circumstance.
@@gregall2178 Sorta of agreeing here. What more info is really needed? That braking was pathetic, and if that was "all she had", the vehicle is unsafe for the road.
#2 Anyone could step out from around the front of that UPS truck. It's also possible the driver might attempt to pull out just as you are passing it. There are a lot of reasons for you to be especially careful as you drive by it.
8:09 have to love how it's NOT the other drivers fault for pulling out when they couldn't see.... No no it's got to be the cammers fault, according to you...... 🙄🙄🙄🙄
7:45 even though cammer is in the right here, and one can assume cammer had a clear unobstructed view to the left. Did cammer even bother looking left before pulling forward? Totally avoidable accident. Problem with all these avoidable accidents if people would just drive defensively is it impacts all of us in the wallet with generally higher insurance rates.
Wet or snow-covered highways are no times to drive at the posted speed or faster. Snow can cause loss of control quicker than wet highways, but wet highways can cause hydroplaining unexpectedly. While stopping on a wet highway can be tricky, stopping on a snow-covered highway will take longer and can cause a loss of control. The solution is to slow way down, no matter what you're driving.
It never used to be this bad, but in the past few months; it has gotten that way, starting to wonder if the owner is using a stupid AI to make the captions now.
1:04 the car infront should be at fault. he canceled his lanes change into the turn lane and stopped at a green light for no reason causing this crash could be insurance fraud
Possibly, but the fact that it was a blizzard, and there were no lane lines, is likely to place the cammer at least partially at fault. He should have braked instead of using the horn.
But the cammer was driving too fast. Still the guy in front's fault, but while the video cut off at the end, it looks like the cammer was going to run that yellow light. That may be why the video ended....didn't want to record himself running the red light in the snow before showing it to the cops.
8:04 "cammer wasn't paying enough attention"? the cammer was going through a green light, you mean the silver suv wasn't paying enough attention and it looks like the cammer was towing something because it was racking his suspension back and forth a little when he finally got stopped.
2:05 I love how after they come to a complete stop in the middle of the highway, they sit their with their thumb up their ass for a few more seconds before accelerating to prevent a wreck. 🤦♂
@@boonarga Agreed. Poor form, because it had to be manually inputted by the channel owner. Granted, it's the submitter of the video that described it in such a way.... and removing it would be censorship - but when has the left ever had a problem with censorship? ;)
#3 0:40 Not that I necessarily doubt the cammer when they say "other driver was on their phone" because it's totally plausible, but when they say "you can see it if you slow it down enough", I had to laugh because, no, you can't. You can frame-by-frame it and you're still not seeing anything through the glare of the on-coming headlamps and the rain on the windscreen. xD
1d10t at 1:00 ...did you really think that was a safe speed to be driving in those conditions? Wonder how the showing of your video went with insurance and the cops... 4:36 thats called cutting someone off from behind....that car was already in the process of moving over just after the solid line ended... 5:!5 you couldve said whoa a few more times...
@@spamlessaccount Yeah, you might be right. The car seemed to be changing lanes, and changed their mind. But I think the cammer might still be partially at fault for refusing to slow down for traffic ahead, since the snow covered up any lane lines.
@@spamlessaccount No, other car was always at least partially in front of the cammer, the lane markings are not visible, cammer was closing on both cars in front pretty quickly. Other car saw oncoming SUV in front and corrected his position on the road (or maybe changed mind on turn, but still had not cleared lane for cammer). Cammer laid on horn, other car heard horn and didn't know why, slowed and stopped. If you look close in the other car driver and passenger are looking around for why horn is blowing - maybe thought someone was sliding into the intersection. Laying on the horn like that would be what someone would do who could not stop. Interesting that the other car was able to stop, but the cammer could not - just expected his horn would make the other car go! As OP said Cammer must slow down and stop.
The thing I'm confused about is 8:10 ... They are questioning if they are towing something, but shouldn't they know as their video description says they have permission from all original copyright owner's permission?
8:10 Cammer: - Has the green light - Has right of way - Possibly towing something which is IRRELEVANT considering the at fault SUV pulled out less than 100-200ft in front of them on a red light and fully stopped in the lane of travel Silver SUV: - Is turning on a red light - Pulls fully into the lane of travel and comes to a full stop less than 100-200ft in front of the cammer vehicle, who has both the green light and right of way, to check if the lane is clear to turn because they COULDN'T see around the larger vehicle stopped at the light - Deserves "Failure to Yield", "Reckless Driving", and "Failure to stop at a red light" tickets Fault lies 100% on the silver SUV and I guarantee when their insurance company saw the dashcam video they accepted fault within minutes.
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 451 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IqI9p4F9F5A/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 451 [USA & Canada Only]](/img/tr.png)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 445 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cmB6MnX1IT4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 448 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rBanyYAv8J8/mqdefault.jpg)
![Best of Monthly Car Crash Compilation [March, 2024]April](/img/n.gif)
*👉Submit your Dashcam video for the feature:* forms.gle/FnavwQg5WwkNkS6r8
*👉Or sent to Email:* megadrivingschoolyt@gmail.com
*👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*czcams.com/video/EBHxyTG0txM/video.html
*👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*czcams.com/video/nhOQi5p2eEI/video.html
*👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*czcams.com/video/lmXA166yMFk/video.html
*👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*czcams.com/video/IqI9p4F9F5A/video.html
*👉Idiots In Cars Compilation :*czcams.com/video/-B3h1siKnYY/video.html
#16 - I'm not interested in reading political opinions of any stripe in captions of a dashcam compilation. If I want some random bozo's political opinion - whatever it is - there are plenty to be found on youtube. I'm here for the idiots in cars. Please do a better job of editing those captions.
8:10 what dumb caption. Was he towing something? doesnt change the illegal turn the other car made, the cammer tried to slow but a car went on a red and drove in his path, the cammer is not at fault legally or in any way, He had a green light, he had right of way, he was in his lane, PERIOD, the other car had a red, the other failed failed to yield to traffic, made an unsafe turn and caused a wreck, to literally and try and blame the victim is insane
MDS is becoming very good at victim blaming. I thought the same thing as you did.
All too many times we hear the narrator trying to spread the blame around. Maybe he works for an insurance company in the "deny every claim" department.
I wanted to make a similar comment. Probably the cammer was not expecting the car to go forward at this point. In any case it is the gray suv that was not paying attention. And I agree MDS sometimes add irrelevant comments.
comments are typically from whoever sent in the video
@@NVMDSTEvil The cammer would never have made a statement like that.
5:21 Never mind going to *any* rallies. Go straight to the nearest grade school and learn to construct a sentence.
just another deranged leftist suffering from TDS
that and stop repeating that stupid lie.
The sentence construction and the ridiculous content should give us an idea of their low reasoning ability.
You must be a Buzz Windrip fan. Sorry, I meant Trump.
All crashes are Trumps fault,don't ya know?
You can only stoke a light post for so long before it reaches completion. Then there's a refractory period during which you just cuddle.
I came here to see if anyone else noticed 😂😂
I’m pretty sure the light post wasn’t stoked about what happened to it😅
Did it shine brighter after you stoked it?🤔🤣
@@Madness832Oh yea. It was like totally stoked dude.
0:55 No, in a perfect world they would not both be at fault. In a perfect world, there wouldn't be any accidents to begin with.
#25 please explain how the commentary blames the cammer for someone turning right on a RED light in front of them. In what world would the cammer be at fault when someone pulls out in front of them? Pay more attention? Stop faster? If you blame the cammer, go turn in your license. No more driving for you.
The commentary has gotten ridiculous on some of these channels. There are enough self-righteous cammers out there submitting clips, they don't need to blame the innocent ones as well.
Agreed. I got into a similar accident (I made the right on red) and it was my fault for going w/o checking if the traffic was clear. Same thing applies here. If you're coming from a secondary road (the exit ramp) to a primary road and you get into an accident turning into the primary road, you're at fault.
I came here to say the same thing.
time stamp please, makes it easy to get to your clip. You see, another viewer need only press the blue letters to get there where as what you left everybody was a search for the relevant location in the video.
I think these channels do that to make people comment and get more engagement on their videos, looks like its working too lol
8:05 Cammer was not paying attention??????? Whatever!
I think they put stupid captions in to get comments.
@@peterhineinlegen4672really??? Whatever???...
oh yah, you're probably correct.
@@peterhineinlegen4672 I give a thumbs down to every MDS video I watch. Used to be a subscriber and give thumbs up every time...don't know what happened to MDS.
4:45 - Semi crossed the gore.
@MegaDrivingSchool -- if you dont have enough submissions to make a full video, it's ok not to post for a day. A lot of the videos with the blurred dates are repeats...well played, but still noticeable.
The rest are just re-posts of someone else's videos to start with.
8:07 Yeah shame on cammer for running that green light!
#14 4:31 (1) Cammer is following too closely.
(2) Cammer changes lanes before the lines allow it.
(3) Cammer tries to pass someone immediately after a lane change. People do not have eyes in the back of their head. So after a lane change you need to wait a few seconds so those in front of you (via occasional glances in their mirrors) can become aware you've changed lanes. Then you can do things (like passing) which put you within collision distance of them.
(4) Cammer tries to pass on the right. Which isn't illegal in the U.S., but it's much riskier than passing on the left. So you need to be extra cautious when doing it.
Edit: For completeness I guess I should add.
(5) Car in front doesn't signal before changing lanes.
(6) Car in front slows down before changing lanes, when there's no need.
But I still think most of the fault still lies with cammer.
Nice detailed analysis!
4 depends on the state you are in. Illegal in Virginia. Legal in California.
@@steveroyer1628 VA 46.2-841 2. Legal to pass on right on a highway with unobstructed pavement, not occupied by parked vehicles, of sufficient width for two or more lines of moving vehicles in each direction. It's legal in almost all 50 states. The only one I know of that is restricted is CT, and that's a restriction applied to two lane highways (i.e. 95 east of New London to RI, Merrit, etc...). 3 or more, OK to do.
@@kpcasey thanks
That sound added on at 6:34 is really getting annoying
This channel has really fallen off. I come here for the cammer commentary, not you being biased and blaming the cammers for accidents that they were not at fault for. If the submitter didn't say anything, then don't add any commentary! Simple as.
His channel and can comment as he likes?
@@gregrod4489 I watch many other dashcam channels and they all just stick to cammer commentary. Sure you can sprinkle jokes in, but blaming a cammer (and not just in this video, it's been done at least a few times previously) even if they're not at fault is just absurd and makes me not want to watch this channel.
It’s almost like that its called mega driving school for a reason and the driving tips are what makes the channel different 😏
There’s nothing wrong with commenting that the cammer was at fault if the cammer was at fault. In most of these videos it’s fairly obvious who’s at fault.
Their comments have been completely wrong at times, like they've never actually taken a driver's course before.
4:32 was it worth it?
Exactly what I was thinking... easily could have been avoided.
I'm curious whether that question is directed towards the driver of the car or the truck. It looked to me like the car was slowing way down unnecessarily just to screw with the trucker and then continued by cutting in front of the trucker without signaling when the trucker tried to avoid rear-ending the car.
16 has Trump causing a near freeway accident. TDS
😂😂😂😂 yep it was all his fault (sarcasm)
I noticed the 'racist Trump rally' comment and wondered how she knew?
4:24... Sweet PIT😂
4:38... CAMMER caused that.100%
5:24... How to say you are a hateful snowflake without saying it.😂
And yet who's the one complaining and throwing names around? Why, it's.... the Trump simp
@@americanbeauty4015 You must be a blond.
@scott931 so you get called out for say snowflake, but the hypocrisy for saying racist trump is completely ok. This is what is wrong with the world.
@@americanbeauty4015 I believe you are throwing names around too. Hypocrite.
True-dat, besides, how does she even know the rally was "racist" anyway? Been to a few of them myself in my city, never saw any of this supposed "racism" that they love to scream about. Then again, saw plenty of that at BLM riots (oops, sorry meant to say "peaceful protests").
the guy running through the crosswalk is from a video like 2 years ago
Why are you still including squealing tire sound effects in some clips?! Knock it off!
0:21: Yet another reminder why cross-*walks* aren't for _running._
But, but, but pedestrians have all the right of way all the time everywhere no matter what!
@@spamlessaccount The guy failed to stop, so its all his fault! Dangerous driving ignoring the road signs! Especially in a position when you cant see!
@@spamlessaccount 🤣
5:10. I've never been to "that" kind of a Trump rally. Whoever wrote the commentary for that video must have TDS.
Who ever goes to hitler's rallies has tds.
2:49 - It took me forty-six years to discover there is a Hales Court, Connecticut.
5:20 - Please delete your gaslighting from future submissions.
not gaslighting. actually racist.
3:13 nice to know some crown vics are still patrolling.
My city still has a few.
I was thinking the same lol
I love playing “spot the unhinged leftist.” Today it only took 5 minutes and 9 seconds.
Yeah and the woman was totally mothering her soyboi husband too. They both probably still live with one set of their parents and go to LARP festivals.
🤣
Woohoo! I'm a racist.
@@ndmac440 congratulations
@1:02 how slow do you think he should've been traveling? Really can't stop on a dime when someone decides to cut you off then slam on their brakes. lol
You're supposed to drive slow enough to stop for whatever reason. Especially on ice.
@@pazuzu7119 He almost wrecked the white suv as well by jumping in front of it and slamming on his brakes. White SUV changed lanes rather than losing the braking battle.
@@pazuzu7119 yet you can't go 5 mph. It's making a stupid assumption that he should be able to stop in 2 feet. You couldn't travel anywhere.
@@pazuzu7119Slow enough that if the car infront of you stops you can also* Not slow enough to stop if ANY RANDOM car moves suddenly into your lane. Are you expecting people to just drive around at literally 10 or less? What a stupid comment wow.
@anniellusion Exactly. Slow enough so that you can stop in an emergency. But don't take my word for it. Not only have I been driving on snow and ice for 50 years, but apparently I'm also stupid. Nothing like getting driving advice from millennials!
0:24 Here in Germany it is forbidden to stop within 15 feet of a crosswalk. The cammer was also not careful enough, as he could not see into the crosswalk because of the van.
Similar in UK - there are zig-zag markings on the road to show where parking is forbidden.
It's the same here, although too many people ignore the law.
Same in Norway
If the cammer couldn't see those wide white lines painted on the roadway, or is unable to comprehend what they mean, maybe he heeds either a seeing eye dog while driving, or shouldn't be driving at all. Also, being as he was on a narrow residential street to begin with, why was he stepping into the throttle that hard? And out of curiosity, where, exactly, in a densely populated city, do you expect a delivery truck of any kind to park? I'd wager that no one commenting on here complains when the trucks stop in the roadway to deliver their orders. Or do you all have specially designated parking spots in front of each home just for them to park in?
Welcome to Chicago, in FIBistan, where rules don't apply and everyone just ignores them.
Road rage is a symptom of a deeper issue: lack of empathy and respect on the roads.
3:35 that wouldn’t be so funny if those guard rails weren’t there huh cammer ?
I was like, "really!"
Voice activated brakes ? Cars are getting so high tech. Whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa
1:58 Driver saves it like a champ and then looks stupid as they sit there in wonderment. As soon as it's back under control, hit the gas and finish up looking like a pro that did it on purpose.
#16 First time I heard of a near crash and following too close blamed on a political candidate. This is what they mean by Trump Derangement Syndrom(TDS) where everything in your life revolves around a political candidate you dislike.... sheesh... Opps, forgot to add your added comment that it was 'racist' too .... of course...
4:31: You illegally crossed the gore point, which places you at least partially at fault.
That is just the Ferrari tax he had to pay.
Picked the one with the deepest pockets.
0:18 Clip 2 - IMHO it's either the illegally parked UPS truck or traffic laws that could have made this safer. Here in UK it's against the law [although some will flout it] to park blocking [or near] a pedestrian crossing - there has to be clear unobstructive view. I couldn't blame the runner or dashcammer if an accident happened.
same in most states in the US, actually.
Would you still defend the runner and then blame the cammer if the sight line was cleat and the runner didn't look?
@@bobroberts2371 IF you think otherwise, please don't drive again. In your hypothetical, if the line of site is clear and the cammer, in a residential area, runs over a pedestrian in a cross-walk then the cammer would absolutely be at fault.
@@kaylaschuler6918 You are also suggesting that if a person runs out in front of a car when the car is 3 ft away, it would be the fault of the driver.
@@kaylaschuler6918there is a point where the Pedestrian does not have Right of Way, in this case the Pedestrian did not as the car was in the intersection
4:17 Cammer and the other guy have no situational awareness.
Cammer might be like me and not give 2 f*cks. They’ve got the row and will own your a** in court. Lesson here? Wait your f*cking turn to change lanes and be more patient. You’re welcome!
5:22 pathetic.
🎯
5:09 racist trump rally huh?? 😂🤣
It's definitely not all those drivers following too closely, has to be the rally.
@@TheQuantumWaveyeah lol. I never even voted for trump in the past two elections but people like her are absolutely nuts.. 😂
Just bad driving. I was in New Braunfels last summer to go to Schlitterban and there is always traffic like this. People just following too closely and not paying attention.
Just someone else that needs some help with his TDS
I live near NB and these TDS infected individuals are all around. They blame everything on him. They think they’re funny but everyone else thinks they’re on the spectrum. Adreno is obviously just as daft. Traffic is always like this especially in the fast lane.
#3
That's 2011-2016 Hyundai Elantra; not a Sonata.
1:50 those blinding lights in the rear should be disabled while driving forward
#4 Thats on you for having the situational awareness of a rock
What? What are you talking about?
Agreed. Couldn't be bothered to help the situation in the slightest beforehand.
5:21 - comment from creator.
So let's get this correct - *DT holds a rally in Texas so it must be racist? *
I'm done here....no my one view will not make a difference to here - jeez I doubt my comment will stay here but at least I now know and don't ever need to return.
See ya
Actually the majority of these commentaries are from the videos themselves, or from the people who submitted them. However, I do feel that the channel creator needs to keep that crud out of it.
#13 4:17 Another perfect example of why one needs a dashcam. Drivers thinking that they can change over multiple lanes without out regard for other drivers just because their signal was on.
#14 4:36 Cannot wait until the "blind-spot" comments. That vehicle was getting over and the "Trucker" was trying to block them. Another CDL bites the dust.
#20 6:34 And another CDL bites the dust. Add in hit-and-run charges.
#27 8:42. Go go now and use "zipper-merge" method to exit. You must stop and let me.
Uh, the semi at 4:40 merged to early causing that crash, the white line was still solid
16. “Racist Trump rally”? Less accusing people of racism without evidence, more studying proper sentence structure & grammar.
Whoever likes Trump is racist.Period
We have a Trump fan over here 😂
@@Misshighness444 Alternatively, I just don’t make a habit of accusing a whole group of people of being racist without cause.
Racism = assuming people have certain traits just because of their race
"Racist Trump rally" = assuming people have certain traits just because they attend a Trump rally
On an abstract level, they're the same thing. Then as a bonus, submitter automatically attributes a random bad event that happens to Trump supporters, when there is absolutely nothing to suggest that.
How about Bigoted Trump Rally? Is that better?
4:13 im glad this cammer didn’t let that Nissan driver get away with her entitledness.
5:20 You are everything that is wrong with the world.
Great video!
2:56 Talk about being a dumb driver… why would you attempt to pass a heavy trailer without wheels?
Should call the police and get the guy charged for this absurdly dangerous act!
00:40 - You get 3 public ones and you just wasted one.
5:02 for those that are unaware, the rule of thumb for police when deciding who to pull over when there’s multiple vehicles committing violations is this: for speeding, whoever is “leading the pack, setting the pace/flow of traffic” or in front, will be pulled over.
For red light violations:
If there happen to be two or more people who follow each other through a red light, whoever is in the rear, thereby being the one who ran the red the longest amount of time after it turned red, is pulled over.
So if you wanna speed, just wait for someone else who’s already speeding to pass, and let them be your “bait” or “blocker”
For the red lights, just don’t run em. But if you do, only do it if you somehow know the guy behind you will follow. After making sure it’s safe to do so and only in exigent circumstance.
love 27 and 28, cammer just avoids the other cars without missing a beat or interrupting their conversation
(almost has accident) Damnit Trump!!!
🤣
They'll blame Trump if their dog passes gas!!
1:31 Two tow-truck drivers were pulling out when some dumbass cammer comes flying down the street.
8:13 - You blame the cammer for not being able to stop in time with no other information than what's in the clip. Shut up.
Do you think contact was unavoidable?
@@gregall2178 Sorta of agreeing here. What more info is really needed? That braking was pathetic, and if that was "all she had", the vehicle is unsafe for the road.
#2 Anyone could step out from around the front of that UPS truck. It's also possible the driver might attempt to pull out just as you are passing it. There are a lot of reasons for you to be especially careful as you drive by it.
8:09 have to love how it's NOT the other drivers fault for pulling out when they couldn't see.... No no it's got to be the cammers fault, according to you...... 🙄🙄🙄🙄
''Traffic Lights not working,, makes the intersection a 4-way stop''' But, most people don't understand a 4-way stop when the stop signs are working!!
7:45 even though cammer is in the right here, and one can assume cammer had a clear unobstructed view to the left. Did cammer even bother looking left before pulling forward? Totally avoidable accident. Problem with all these avoidable accidents if people would just drive defensively is it impacts all of us in the wallet with generally higher insurance rates.
Nonsense. No one can predict red light runners. It doesn't matter if he saw cross-traffic, because cross-traffic is supposed to stop at the red!
@@mvpfocus , you have the dumbest reply ever known to man.
#16 5:06 is still suffering from TDS. 😂
0:12 what are you talking about? You are probably worse than him just for making that statement!
5:44 I love how the other person said "what's with the horn"? My thoughts, exactly. What good is a honk after the collision occurred? 😀
1:45....And the best thing to do in a near miss is to drive like a bat out of hell so you could get beside him....to do what??
3:13 you may want to add a little *beep* in there...
Wet or snow-covered highways are no times to drive at the posted speed or faster. Snow can cause loss of control quicker than wet highways, but wet highways can cause hydroplaining unexpectedly.
While stopping on a wet highway can be tricky, stopping on a snow-covered highway will take longer and can cause a loss of control. The solution is to slow way down, no matter what you're driving.
The speculative commentary at the top of these videos is ridiculous and often quite incorrect. Would be a better channel without it.
It never used to be this bad, but in the past few months; it has gotten that way, starting to wonder if the owner is using a stupid AI to make the captions now.
3:43 How about slow the hell down in slippery road conditions & not have to correct at all?
4:14 I guess he'll remember this experience
5:16, glad you weren't hurt😂
4:54 - Gotta make that quota!
And the Ferrari can afford it the most.
0:42 🎧
1:04 the car infront should be at fault. he canceled his lanes change into the turn lane and stopped at a green light for no reason causing this crash could be insurance fraud
Possibly, but the fact that it was a blizzard, and there were no lane lines, is likely to place the cammer at least partially at fault. He should have braked instead of using the horn.
But the cammer was driving too fast. Still the guy in front's fault, but while the video cut off at the end, it looks like the cammer was going to run that yellow light. That may be why the video ended....didn't want to record himself running the red light in the snow before showing it to the cops.
8:04 "cammer wasn't paying enough attention"? the cammer was going through a green light, you mean the silver suv wasn't paying enough attention and it looks like the cammer was towing something because it was racking his suspension back and forth a little when he finally got stopped.
0:25 "Didnt he just make a circle?" 🙄 And?
2:05 I love how after they come to a complete stop in the middle of the highway, they sit their with their thumb up their ass for a few more seconds before accelerating to prevent a wreck. 🤦♂
Fake noise added to videos and reposted videos with the dates blurred out. What a channel
1:41 Roadside Express. I bet it will be hard to get any business if your phone won't stop ringing and you get a million one star reviews.
Can I watch one video without somebody bringing politics into it? Including the comments section.
Apparently no. I get political, in the proper forum, but prefer a break when I want something else.
No. "Everything is sexist, everything is racist, everything is phobic and you have to point it all out to everyone, all the time."
-Anita Sarkeesian
It’s crap. And MDS continues to allow it.
Merci au dash cam du Québec qui nous montre les plus gros mourront
4:50 Antiquated speed limits that haven't been adjusted in 40 years purely for revenue generation.
1:37 - Dude was trying to create business!
5:00 THE CONSEQUENCES OF SPEEDING IN A FERRARI IS MUCH MORE HORRIFIC THAN IN A NORMAL SEDAN
5:22- Racist Trump rally? How about posting an example of his racism.
How about not. How about the channel owner leave the political crap out of a dashcam channel.
@@boonarga Agreed. Poor form, because it had to be manually inputted by the channel owner. Granted, it's the submitter of the video that described it in such a way.... and removing it would be censorship - but when has the left ever had a problem with censorship? ;)
Yes...what the fk was that about!? I'm going 2 unsubscribe. I can watch all of these SAME vids on anoth er dashcam channel
👍👍
#3 0:40 Not that I necessarily doubt the cammer when they say "other driver was on their phone" because it's totally plausible, but when they say "you can see it if you slow it down enough", I had to laugh because, no, you can't. You can frame-by-frame it and you're still not seeing anything through the glare of the on-coming headlamps and the rain on the windscreen. xD
@MegaDrivingSchool when you're recycling this many old clips maybe you should title the video "Best Of"?
6:57 Must be one of those Toyolet Cameri's
4:33 lol why you driving so mad for sir 😂😂
I was surprised to see my clip as #1, seeing as I sent it in at least a year ago, but better late than never, I guess!
Old is gold! Please send new footages 🙏
1d10t at 1:00 ...did you really think that was a safe speed to be driving in those conditions? Wonder how the showing of your video went with insurance and the cops... 4:36 thats called cutting someone off from behind....that car was already in the process of moving over just after the solid line ended... 5:!5 you couldve said whoa a few more times...
5:22 that's sum edumakation right thar
tRump loves the poorly educated.
3:12 Crown Vic 🥰🥰🥰
8:48 Maybe thety were trying to figure out how to get to Wendy's ;)
0:55: Cammer is at fault. The vehicle ahead could be preparing to turn left. Cammer must slow down and not rear-end traffic ahead.
The difference is that the other car moved in front of the cammer first. Not the same as slowing to turn left.
@@spamlessaccount Yeah, you might be right. The car seemed to be changing lanes, and changed their mind. But I think the cammer might still be partially at fault for refusing to slow down for traffic ahead, since the snow covered up any lane lines.
@@spamlessaccount No, other car was always at least partially in front of the cammer, the lane markings are not visible, cammer was closing on both cars in front pretty quickly. Other car saw oncoming SUV in front and corrected his position on the road (or maybe changed mind on turn, but still had not cleared lane for cammer). Cammer laid on horn, other car heard horn and didn't know why, slowed and stopped. If you look close in the other car driver and passenger are looking around for why horn is blowing - maybe thought someone was sliding into the intersection. Laying on the horn like that would be what someone would do who could not stop. Interesting that the other car was able to stop, but the cammer could not - just expected his horn would make the other car go! As OP said Cammer must slow down and stop.
5:37 I mean, you have to admit he DOES drive like a Boss. Pissing on everyone else
The thing I'm confused about is 8:10 ... They are questioning if they are towing something, but shouldn't they know as their video description says they have permission from all original copyright owner's permission?
:44 looks like a yellow could be tan but I thought it looked more like a one of those boxer elements or something like that
4. No actually the victim is not at fault lol
8:10 Cammer:
- Has the green light
- Has right of way
- Possibly towing something which is IRRELEVANT considering the at fault SUV pulled out less than 100-200ft in front of them on a red light and fully stopped in the lane of travel
Silver SUV:
- Is turning on a red light
- Pulls fully into the lane of travel and comes to a full stop less than 100-200ft in front of the cammer vehicle, who has both the green light and right of way, to check if the lane is clear to turn because they COULDN'T see around the larger vehicle stopped at the light
- Deserves "Failure to Yield", "Reckless Driving", and "Failure to stop at a red light" tickets
Fault lies 100% on the silver SUV and I guarantee when their insurance company saw the dashcam video they accepted fault within minutes.
Exactly. This channels "thing" these days is "victim blaming".
Talk about egregious overuse of horns in this video. Sheesh.
I love French swear words, English swear words are usually sexual or private part orientated but French are just church words.
Tabarnak!
Cammer 14 came into the lane too early. Fault shared by both drivers