Can Astrologists & Astronomers See Eye To Eye? | Middle Ground
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 27. 04. 2024
- Shop Jubilee merch! shop.jubileemedia.com Every purchase helps us create your favorite shows - thanks for your support!
Follow us on INSTAGRAM: đ / jubileemedia đ
Now you can watch our videos in Spanish! bit.ly/Suscribirse_Jubilee_ES
SUBSCRIBE for more! bit.ly/SUBSCRIBEjubilee
Be in a Jubilee video: bit.ly/JubileeCasting
Everyone in this video was tested for COVID-19. We will continue to adhere to local guidelines and safety precautions for the health and safety of our cast and crew.
đ We started a second channel! Behind the scenes, director commentaries, reaction videos, and more! Check it out & subscribe to Twobilee: / @twobilee
Are you a loyal Jubilee fan? Join our Facebook group: / 407942859721012
Support Jubilee: www.jubileemedia.com/support
Have an idea or a personal story you'd like to share? Submit here: airtable.com/shrFDrsc4DzgBV3lV
| ABOUT |
We believe in the power of empathy for human good. Ultimately, we aim to inspire people to EMBRACE EMPATHY.
| SOCIAL |
Jubilee Facebook: / jubileemedia
Jubilee Instagram: / jubileemedia
Jubilee Twitter: / jubileemedia
Jubilee Website: www.jubileemedia.com
FEATURING
Trent- / trentiwayne
Nina- ninabastrology.com/
Ebony- / ebonyjayhardiman
00:00 Intro
01:50 Astrology is a sham
06:37 My beliefs are supported by science
10:43 Celestial objects influence people's mood
15:20 I believe in zodiac signs and their predictions
18:29 The other side doesn't fully understand the study of celestial objects
For brands interested in partnering with Jubilee, email us:
hello@jubileemedia.com - ZĂĄbava
best part
astronomer: well im not a evolutionary biologist so i wouldnt know
astrologist:well im a cancer rising so i feel the moon and i know
this is comedic gold
The guy really knew what his limitations on the topic were and then that girl went on to say that lmao
Fr
The more I watched the video and listened to the astrologists, the more I realized that they have a lot in common with religion as a whole.
Religion is not based on facts and cannot be proven but wants to pass as the ultimate truth. Personal experience plays a huge role in the foundation of peopleâs religiosity.
Instead of energy, religion appeals to faith in order to supposedly prove its trustworthiness and reliability.
Very funny. Though also she is very wrong, 28 days is the average cycle but the cycle length varies from woman to woman. So I guess being cancer rising didn't help her know there!
she immediately reminded me of that meme "Omg I crashed a car! I'm such a libra"
âItâs a science because I use mathâ âŠhoney I use math in dungeons and dragons that doesnât make it a scientific pursuit
I used math to calculate resources in Minecraft too,math is merely a tool to describe basically the language of reality,we use these tool to describe a lot of stuff including science
BAHAHAHAHA amazing comment
Yeah umm i think he was the most radical one
AMAZING!
yup basically
The issue I find with astrology is that it, inherently, can never be "wrong". Every inconsistency is shrugged off as an alternative interpretation.
which is why itâs not a science.
^^^ this can be applied to religion fr fr
@@qingxinn_facts!! if it does not have the ability to be falsified then nothing is really being said
@@ilTHfeaa exactly. Science isn't always as fun as astrology for this reason. It's much more about the external world telling you what's real rather than you discovering for yourself what's real. Which is why scientists will work for years to prove their theories and will often end up being wrong because that's just the way it works.
That is the definition of an unfalsifiable claim. The very basic minimal requirement of a scientific proposition is that it should be falsifiable.
The amount of times he said "energy" without it actually meaning anything was mind numbing
âIâm not an evolutionary biologist so idkâ
âIâm a cancer rising so I feel the moonâ
Yep that pretty much sums it up
I believe in astrology, but she made us look insane đŹ
@@user-jq2wg6vk4p you are insane
@@alasdairscott4718 Iâm not insane for having beliefs. Just until the past decade, we didnât know everything was energy, and we still donât know what dark energy is. There is still so much about the universe that we donât know for us to be pompous enough to think we have all of the answers. I donât believe in mainstream astrology. I believe in constellational astrology. I believe in patterns in the universe. If that makes me insane, then so be it, but at least Iâm not being told by others what to believe.
@@user-jq2wg6vk4p past decade ? Dude you need to get back to science asap ! Ever heard of e=mcÂČ ? Yeah that's basically a conversion equation of converting mass into energy. That's year 1905 when we literally devised a equation to calculate how much energy we have in our universe. And yeah, you had to know that the entire universe is made of energy if you wanna start working on discovering an equation about it.
@@user-jq2wg6vk4p we are closer to having a perfect model to explain everything in the universe thanks to the advancement of the quantum theories, so if u want answers you can sit and wait cuz they'll keep coming
This is like an actual proffesional blacksmith talking to a guy who crafted 10,000 axes in minecraft
As a Minecraft player I feel offended
Psh. Amateurs. Talk to me when you've crafted 1000 iron daggers in Skyrim.
Hit the nail on the head.
Thank you for this laugh, I needed it.
ahahhahahahahhahh
You can really see how the astronomers ponder over how ruthless they want to be
Ponder? They came in thirsty for blood. đ
@@skyguytomas9615Nah, they were incredibly gentle with these weirdos.
â@@skyguytomas9615they were considerably nice
This!!!!!!!!!!
Factssss
I respect these scientists for being able to stay so calm with these takes, as a physics student I wouldn't be able to stop myself laughing tbh
Im surprised the astronomers said something wrong. 13:50.
So the thing about that is that it is because of the speed of light, and it took that long for the light to reach you. But it's not only the speed of light. it's the maximum speed of the universe.
For example, if the Sun disappeared, we wouldn't know for around eight minutes. That's because that's how long the light would take to reach us. But it's not only the light. it's everything that affects us from the sun, like the gravitational pull. The gravitational pull wouldn't be noticed instantly ethier it would be noticed when we saw the light. That's because everything's maximum speed is the speed of light. So if this beetlejuice plant/star, i don't know what it is, disappeared, we wouldn't feel the effects of its disappearance until we saw the light.
Sorry if the English is bad, im only 15, and im not from an English speaking country.
Also, source: i learned this from watching a video from Neil DeGrasse Tyson.
@@altaccount9716 I believe you missed her point entirely, she's saying because it takes photons, gravity, cosmic rays, etc. *time* to propagate through space to reach us here on Earth; then how is it possible that Astrologers are using such celestial objects to make present-day claims about humanity, WHEN those same objects no loner currently exist in this present-day to be interpreted at all.
But there is a rebuttal/counterargument to this that could have been made by the Astrologers, but they're not versed enough in science to make this logical counterpoint
Bro astrology and physics don't have much in common. You are not more qualified to judge than any normie
@@ND7226bad take
@@ND7226they have very much in common what are you taking about
Crystal healers and geologist, thatâll be interesting lol
That would be freaking embarrassing. Imagine believing a freaking ROCK can do anything let alone work the cosmic powers in your favor. I donât understand human beings I swear
@@tasneemahmed5821 embarrassing but nothing could ever beat flat earthers vs scientist
@@tasneemahmed5821 I think rocks can heal you if you believe in it bacuse it's a placebo
I think they would also need a doctor
Thatâs a great suggestion!
âPsychology is not rooted in a scientific method but in a personâs energyâ
cries in statistics
Legit lmao I would not want her for a psych consultđđđ
I came to the comments section to group cringe at that statement.
Cries in psychological statistical methods in psychology and experimental psychology
Statistics yup, statistics yup yup
Imagine the reaction on your final exam from the opposer when you say "My thesis is rooted in my personal energy so i thought, no need to use ANOVA". :D
Super intelligent how the astronomer said yes, there is likely a connection between women's menstrual cycles and the moon, but that's a topic for an evolutionary biologist to address. Excellent critical thinking and appropriate professional awareness of one's field.
âThe human menstrual cycle is only the about same length as the lunar month - it isnât synchronised with a particular phase.
One frequently cited study, published in the American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology in 1980, found some evidence of synchronisation, but the effect was very weak. Of the sample of 312 women, 244 had cycles that were longer than 29 days or shorter than 27, and only 70 per cent of the rest actually started their period within two weeks of the full Moon.
If locking our reproductive cycle to the lunar month was advantageous, you might expect other animals to do the same. Orangutans and possums have 28-day cycles, but our closest relatives, the chimpanzees, have 35-day cycles. Non-primate mammals have an oestrous cycle, which works differently to menstruation, but none of them synchronise their reproduction with the phases of the Moon.â
source: sciencefocus
âStudies suggest synchronizations in the lunar and menstrual cycles are down to random chance.
It turns out, most evidence suggests that a personâs period links up with lunar cycles only at the rate youâd expect due to random chance. Early studies suggested a tenuous link.
However, a 2013 retrospective study in the journal Endocrine Regulations that tracked 74 women over a year found no evidence for the synchronization of lunar phases to the menstrual cycle.
The rise of period-tracking apps has enabled researchers to undertake even bigger studies. In 2019, researchers at the tracking app Clue analyzed 7.5 million cycles from 1.5 million app users. (This analysis did not go through peer review, a process whereby outside experts vet new research before it's published.) They found no evidence that menstrual cycles or periods were more likely to happen at any time in the lunar cycle.â
source: livescience
TLDR: there is no basis in the science, nor evolutionary evidence that the timeframes of menstruation and the lunar cycle happen to be vaguely similar. Humans like to make connections and a lot of the time periods of time in the natural world just happen to be similar due to random chance.
â@@fallenangel_899i fear you grossly misunderstood what he meant when saying it correlates with the lunar month meaning the amount of time is the same, not that the lunar cycle and menstrual cycle occur at the same time
But everyoneâs menstrual cycle is different, so how could menstruation be in any way related to an unchanging lunar cycleâŠ?
@@TH-el1dr Thereâs literally nothing to fear lol
Evolutionary biology is not a thing.
A friend of mine told me âastrology is religion wearing a lab coatâ, and this video sure does show a lot of that lol.
Thatâs disrespectful to religionsâŠ
@@Brandon_TG_SmithMay I ask what the difference between astrology and other spiritual practices are?
@@spicytargaeryan Astrology is probably false and conflicts with science
Most spiritual beliefs usually have not been disproven and usually do not conflict with science
Religion (according to its followers) has been proven and does not conflict with science
@@spicytargaeryanI mean would you like to get specific or do you simply mean both types are employing faith for their beliefs? Cause, duh.
@@PaperParade I donât âmeanâ anything. Iâm asking a question
"astrology is a science" and then "i interpret the astrology to fit my desired result"
that is literally the antithesis of science..
Imagine if people did that with physics. Like gravity. "What does this ball want? If I throw it up it comes back down, therefore it wants to be with me. If I just let go of it then it falls to the ground, so it must want to get away from me. If I throw it, it won't come back because it thinks I don't want it."
Astrology and flat earthers make me so frustrated because they ignore logic and data and make up a narrative to fit their own views. And that's gotta be the worst way to live. You're life is basically a lie at that point, and you're too thick headed to even realize it.
So, astrology is NOT a science that's why arrogant people call it "pseudo-science" but then again, it's also true that it's NOT NOT-A-SCIENCE because, to be a "pseudo"-science it should be partially true/functional... So, Astrology is not a science because it involves the individual's interpretation of abstract factors that can't be pinned down to the point you can replicate it 100% of the times"... which is exactly the case with Psychology... "Oh, but we can see the chemical reactions on the brain!" Yes, and we can also measure the gravity of ALL planets on earth, but we can't prove their correlation with astrology's claims (because science just doesn't want to give astrology a chance, I mean its so easy to prove it's wrong but they don't because that's how science works when there's a new hypothesis that clearly shows some results) just like how psychologists can't prove which chemical reactions correlate to which trauma/stimulus/etc... so they're both pseudo-sciences.
haley you totally missed the boat on this.
@@JoeBrandAG astrology isnât backed by empirical data, thus the claim that astrology being a science cannot be true. The claim that it canât not be science is a redundancy to attempt to create a counter argument that is faulty at its root.
@@thelittleowl8399 go off king
âPsychology isnât a scienceâ
Psychologists: đđđ
@Alexa Brock and some peopleâs ignorance would change it?
@Alexa Brock I mean people do not define what science is and what is not lol, as these astrologers are doing. For something to be considered as a science it needs a lot of scrutinization and steps, etc.
Psychology is a science though. Human behaviour is understood by conducting many experiments often involving the manipulation of variables. Mathematical tests are done to test the significance of the results and quantitative data is also often collected and used for analysis and comparison.
definition: the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.
yes, its a science, albeit a soft science with more variables and more chaotic, if you can study animals and call it science then you can study humans and call it science, were also animals and we behave in complex ways
Its more of a soft science. A subcategory of biology. But psychological data is sometimes quite hard to reproduce because people's minds are so unique.
I love how every time the astronomers asked where did the association between certain planets and emotions came from the astrologers would simply start listing what planet is associated with each emotion.
Or how that guy said astrology has to be a science because they use math and charts
Im surprised the astronomers said something wrong. 13:50.
So the thing about that is that it is because of the speed of light, and it took that long for the light to reach you. But it's not only the speed of light. it's the maximum speed of the universe.
For example, if the Sun disappeared, we wouldn't know for around eight minutes. That's because that's how long the light would take to reach us. But it's not only the light. it's everything that affects us from the sun, like the gravitational pull. The gravitational pull wouldn't be noticed instantly ethier it would be noticed when we saw the light. That's because everything's maximum speed is the speed of light. So if this beetlejuice plant/star, i don't know what it is, disappeared, we wouldn't feel the effects of its disappearance until we saw the light.
Sorry if the English is bad, im only 15, and im not from an English speaking country.
Also, source: i learned this from watching a video from Neil DeGrasse Tyson.
@@altaccount9716 While you're correct about the gravity, quantum entanglement seems to be defying that definition of "maximum speed of the universe". Sure, we both don't know anything about quantum mechanics, but it is what scientists are saying. Quantum entanglement would "travel" in space-time instantly, or so it seems.
â@@viniwittkepretty sure this isn't true, and that quantum entanglement can't actually allow transfer of any amount of information faster than the speed of light. There is what appears to be "simultaneous" events taking place at a distance wrt some frame of reference, but no information can be transferred in the process. I'm not an expert though, I'd suggest looking into the EPR paradox if you want to learn more.
@@MatthewJohnson-hi2th Nice, I read more about it and found out about the "no-communication theorem". Interestingly enough, not even scientist are sure about it, therefore it's still only a theorem. But if there is one thing I learned from looking at the past is you can't believe our boundaries of science will remain the same through the decades/centuries. Without any reason beyond belief in the human capabilities, I think eventually humanity will find a faster way (to at least send information) through space-time. Cheers and thanks for the comment!
One thing that stood out to me is how often the astronomers asked questions about what the astrologists believe, compared to how often the astrologists asked.
I liked hearing the astronomer talk about how the moon affects his mood by being so beautiful
Yeah, the idea that scientists are these cold calculating inhuman robots is an insane assumption a lot of people have. Scientifically minded people can be just as connected to and emotionally impacted by the universe and itâs beauty as anyone.
It's so cute, I love hearing scientists talk about the beauty in the things they study, idk why that specifically but it brings joy to my heart
Thanks so much, I truly love the stars and the beauty of the cosmos!
It really does. Taking my astronomy course has made me look at life different. Itâs such a beautiful feeling to know you are apart of such an amazing universe.
Food does that for me. Lol
Canât believe Jubilee still havenât done Africans v African Americans đ
I assume it sort of not easy to find real Africans and get them to participate in your videos.
Ikr
@@robertking4645 Africa is a big continent, shouldn't be that difficult to find someone in Africa who would be interested in participating
@@robertking4645 agreed especially in the US lol. Legit theyd have to go search for Africans who just moved to the US
They could do 1st generation Africans or international students/workers. I am sure there are some in California
I remember watching a video on how personality tests, and astrology and these things don't mean squat bc they're just so broad they could fall into practically anyone, there was an experiment where a teacher created a personality test for his 50 students, and stated that they can't tell anyone about the results, and then were asked if the results were accurate, somethnig like 80% said yes, but the kicker was that they were the same results for everyone
that's what psychology calls as "the barnum effect" (and yes, psychology is a real science :D)
I am a pretty sceptical person, but when my psychology teacher did this experiment with my class i fully fell for it as well. Just goes to show confirmation bias is very powerful, even the sceptical among us will fall for it.
Wondering if you would happen to have a link to either that CZcams video or to something describing that teacherâs experiment? I find that very interesting.
@@sacchrine_ Hardly
I sort of wish they asked the question âspace is coolâ just so all of them could geek out about planets and stars and have a fun intermission
NO SPACE ISN'T COOL!!! >:(
Thatâs not even a questionâŠ
Astrologers donât think space is cool. They think of themselves as cool, and space revolves around them!
@@funnyberries4017So true. A lot of the appeal of astrology isnât in some appreciation for the cosmos, itâs the sense of identity superiority it provides (and all the issues that come with that).
These guys said "energy" more times than I did today and I'm taking chemistry and physics.
LMAOO
i just 'feel' that energy surging through me
Astrologist: "If you take all the energies of the sun you'll get enough energies to create more energies inside people. Unless the energies conflict with your shakkra energies then you'll just be left with two energies"
Another Astrologist: "YASSS"
@@AleXander-eo3iz I feel the energies
@@AleXander-eo3iz The energy in this statement really allowed my energy to feel your energy
I think astrology should be kept as a spiritual belief, not compare it to science
@Extended Long I practice the metaphysical & in my opinion itâs a belief not science I wouldnât even bring it up into science Bc ik it would just be debunked as not scientifically accurate or possible
@Extended Long okay, and it was evaluated in this video lol therefore itâll be a spiritual belief
Most people I know donât even see it as a science they just like it for fun, yet people still get so angry about it đ I think people who hate astrology need lives personally.
@whatupbrahs and most people I know just view it as funâŠso again people who hate astrology so much need lives đ
@@UrbanDecayLova247 truth
Astronomers are people who do actual science while astrologists are just looking for something to blame because they can't control their own feelings
This is like watching highschoolers debate their teachers
Or religious people debate biologists
I didnât know people thought astrology was a science
Yep there's the people who think it's interesting but don't take it serious there's the people who like it in a spiritual sense but know it isn't science and then there's the people who take it way to seriously and ask you your sign before your name and tell you stuff like "oh your a virgo well I'm a gemini and we're just not going to get along together"
@@nick-vv1lz Yep, I like it in a spiritual sense. Not in a militant sense. I would never disregard someone based on their sign. Thatâs silly lol
This is why we have the term pseudoscience.
Exactly i thought we were doing it for fun đ
@@nick-vv1lz yup Iâm one of those that think itâs interesting but definitely donât take it seriously lol đ
I aspire to have the patience of these astronomers. Hearing "energy", "I feel like", "affirming", "resonates with me" while discussing science would have made me lose my cool.
@Sanningen There is no "energy for me or you or them" in scince. Just like people don't say "Well, gravity for me is...". Energy in physics is a quantitative property. And whenever you say "studies show", please provide backup. What studies, where and under what curcustances those studies were performed, how many test subjects therer were (and what are the ages, genders they are), where it was published?. The moon affect the tide because of gravitational pull.
@Sanningen if you start with "Energy for me can be" you're already outside the realm of science. You can talk and use the term "energy", but don't pretend to be talking about science. Scientific terms are very precisely determined.
Constellations have no effect on our lives except for the light they produce.
Regarding the moon claim, it can come down to the amount of light you see, your biological sleep cycles, the placebo effect or many others. You wouldn't even be able to include gravity has because (at best) the moon exerts a force of 0.005 Newtons/kg compared to Earth's 9.8 N/kg, meaning it would get lost in the uncertainty of your potential paper. I don't think we're able to isolate the moon as the primary factor.
Both sides were cringey in this episode. Hard to watch.
Right? When she compared psych and astrology. I would have had to walk out right there lmaooo
cry about it
I like the IDEA of Middle Ground a lot. Sometimes it genuinely works - like when there is an interesting difference of opinion on hot political/ethical issues, for example - but in this case, and in a few others I've seen recently (e.g. flat earth) it is just incorrect people refusing to be educated, and I don't believe it's correct to even insinuate there is a "middle ground" to be found here.
That is the concept of middle ground, is for both sides to be heard in the middle where no one is going at anotherâs throat.
@@bentucky4324 I suppose in this case, my main grievance is with the name "middle ground". There is no middle ground on these types of issue. There is scientific, and there is wilful ignorance, and we shouldn't celebrate the idea that that one of them is okay.
HOWEVER - I see what you're saying, and there should absolutely be an environment where adults with nonsensical beliefs can be educated politely without being mocked - it just should not be called "middle ground".
Well I doubt they'll change the name since this has been a series for over 5 years now đ In the case of this episode it was more or less a spiritual vs scientific perspective on astral bodies of course they'd be very different. Vast majority of the episodes people from each side do agree/disagree on the same prompt, but every now and then hard-headed idiots come which can't be avoided especially on topics like flat earth.
In the end theres been a common ground that was agreed on. They said that astrology is needed for poeple's enjoyment. Basically like religion, its there to control the morons.
@@caneofsomaria I get your point. There are just way too many people who believe that stuff and they're not gonna stop. There has to be some kind of middle ground.
This videos will never cease to amaze me, how incredibly sure some people are of their ideas. I just wish I had like 5% of that confidence fr
Never say itâs impossible
tbh i didnt find them that confident. I find they were rly trying hard to justify their careers. I found them desperate and pathetic....
Don't wish for that. Wish for rationality.
It's called being passionate. Find a hobby that you absolutely love doing, and you'll be just as confident as they are
âIâm a cancer rising so I feel the moon.â That made me giggle tbh.
đđđđđđđ
In astrology, the Ascendant is what zodiac sign was RISING over the horizon, to the east, you can take a glance at the sky to appreciate this. Use an app or something. Anyways, the rising or ascendant is what was first marked upon your being to take the role of, when you came out of the womb. It's how "you" or how others may perceive you, and physically; by first impression mostly. Your looks.
Cancer is tied to being ruled by the moon, so... she feels connected to it. As she could, a Cancer rising.
@@giodalle who asked? đ
@@Ghanemq8 wow, great question dude.
@@giodalle ...so who asked?
Time and time again, Jubilee keep showing us that the most clueless people are always the most confident.
yep.... Dunning-Kruger effect
Facts
Factss
Jw who are u referring to here?
@@christinagaller4374 obviously the people that believe in astrology
I honestly cannot understand how a grown adult can seriously think looking at the stars will reveal anything about human affairs
I don't agree but i can understand. It's the same as religion. It adds some purpose or meaning to their life and it makes them feel better. I honestly find it sad when these people get made fun of or bullied. Like let them believe in this stuff if it makes them feel better and happy
@@kc_h7h itâs not religion is backed by evidence.
@@luisfilipe2023 its not though...
@@halla359 it is
@@luisfilipe2023 well that would have to be alot of evidence since we have thousands of religions...
Well, when you can interpret something any way you want, of course it is never wrong.
Thus, it is cannot be classified as science
That astronomer stepping forward when asked if celestial objects influence peopleâs moods and going on and on about pretty planets literally made my day
My problem is though, that they could be right. I donât see why planets being far away means they canât influence us, they do, we can see them and thus experience them. But I just donât see ANY evidence to what astrologers say. I could copy their ideas and make up my own and then defend them with new ideas like they
@@Pivotification except your think off intuition instead of evidence. Just because we can see the light from a star (one that possibly no longer even exists) doesnât mean they have an actual physical effect on us other than looking pretty and effecting us emotionally in that way. We know the gravity from far off celestial bodies doesnât effect us in any significant way objectively.
@Are You Going To Do The 'Ora Ora' Thing? A peer reviewed study recently came out about how our moon affects us physically depending on whether itâs a full moon or a new moon. If the moon is one of the reasons we have tides & affects us physically in terms of our sleep cycle (which can then affect mood) who knows what is possible when it comes to celestial bodies having a influence over us.
@@moodypanda127 causation =/= correlation.
@@moodypanda127 That's just a cultural effect. Full half and new moon means different things in each culture and to each people. It doesn't prove anything.
Nina lost me the minute she said you could use astrology "to validate and affirm the things that you feel in yourself". That is pretty much the definition of confirmation bias; and if you've got confirmation bias going on, your science is at the very least heavily flawed and likely not really science at all.
Exactly. When they say theyâre just showing possibilities. They just pick and choose things until it perfectly encapsulates the person. There are so many components to astrology that you can just take out and add things until they fit
@@shuruktigarajeswaran9852 yep, and they make the VAGUEST interpretations so that whoever is reading that feels like it's describing themself.
For example: most aquarius moon don't like to fit in a box, they thrive in wild conditions.
Like that's at least 60% of people on earth. Mockery
She is literally just a con artist
Lmaoooooooooooo
She was so judgemental and seemed like she wasn't hearing out the otherside.
The astrologers definitely retreated from âthis is a scienceâ to âthis is interpretive and more like studying the vibeâ
One group clearly thinks logically and the other thinks based on their feelings and emotions
they should've made the astrologers guess the astronomers' risings, that would have been fun
Well the lady said you canât know someone that well after first meeting them to make a prediction, so theyâd probably just say that if they get the signs wrong.
I was thinking that :)))
so to get rising signs we need the exact birth time down to hours and minutes, place and date of birth, not everyone has their birth time with them (usually can be found in birth certificate though).
just to clarify :3
Great idea. At least they can prove something. If itâs science, there should be reliability.
LMAOOO đđđ
Precisely
"I'm a cancer rising so I feel the moon" I can't deal with this
when Nina said that they have anecdotal evidence, I clocked out 12:40 btw. you can't argue or reason with a person that thinks like that and the fact that they still call it a science is just an insult to the scientist community.
my grandma got cancer and i hope she is rising too now that she is not with us anymore...
I couldnât help but laugh after she said that đ
@@luigi1606 lmfao stfu lol
I'm dying over here....not of cancer, of laughter. Will rise off the ground at some point
whatâs so funny about it?
I like how respectful they are when someone is talking and really put otherâs opinion into consideration :)) astronomers were genuinely curious and astrologists respective for whatever response they might get and answered them based on their own knowledge (vice versa).
I did not like how respectful they were
It is so funny seeing how he keeps using the word enegy and the astronomers probably are like: Here we go again
âPsychology isnât based on the scientific methodâ I want to SCREAM
Not all parts of psychology is
@@brendad.6204 yes, all parts of MODERN psychology are. If youâre referring to the ancient theories of Jung and Freud, those arenât respected anymore BECAUSE theyâre not empirically sound.
Psychology is not a science in a strict way.
@@josealbertocardenasyalan6702 according to who exactly??? I have a bachelor of science in psychology and I work as a research assistant in two psychology labs. From where I stand, itâs absolutely a science in a âstrictâ sense
â@@jasminewilliams8944 you are right, my bad. I just search information about the psychology status.
I'm kinda old and english is not my native language. :(
"Is astrology a science?"
"No"
There you go, saved you 22 minutes.
Lolll
Thanks cap
fax
It's more a mythology/legend connected to the symbols. Everyone has their own interpretation tho so I'm not gunna go that rabbit hole lmao
@@journeyinspirit So it's fiction.
If Astrology actually works we would be using it for important things such as Medicine, Rocket science, Predicting a natural calamity etc. Imagine a patient complaining about chest pain and the doctor goes, "Hold up, let me pull out the chart and feel the vibrations. Oh, the chart says you have a bright future so it must just be a gastric issue, just drink some water".
In astrology it's actually can detect an illnesses that somebody might have based on their birth chart, but once again is not popular and it because already stamped as not practical and as a pseudoscience. But does it already help the clients that may come to the astrologer in some degree? Yes it's already does, but once again it's just not being widespread and still considered as taboo for some.
Baby thatâs not this kind of world. We are not moving people ahead we are being kept down and sleep
@@hausoflaboratorieswith respect, you are making claims that you cannot back up. There is zero peer reviewed evidence that validates the claim that astrology can reveal any illness whatsoever.
@@ROVA00 yes there is no such things in astrology, there is no peer reviewed from what I found. But if you found some of it in astrology please inform us. Like I said it's not practical hence isn't a science. Therefore that's what the middle ground of this video that you watched. Yes maybe astrology can't exclusively reveal what illnesses that one might have based on peer reviewed but it can based on one birth chart. For example if someone is a Capricorn dominant aka Saturn dominant or Sun sign in cap, you are prone to have injury on your teeth, feet, jawline. That's how I see it.
Gotta hydrate water is love water is life
wow i'm impressed how professional and polite they were in this discussion. Kudos to them. I for myself couldn't stop laughing whenever the astrologists said anything XD
I just came home from a physics exam and the number of times this guy said energy made me cry.
Iâm actually wheezing right now
You keep using that word⊠I donât think it means what you think it means
ikr... They constantly use the word in a non-scientific way
Well Sir i got a fact for you then ! nothing MATTERS unless its ENERGY huehuehuheue
My mom says that crap. I wanna carve out my eardrums with spoons. Ughh.
Listening to the Astrologists talk, you can't convince me they're not just making it up as they go
Alr bro
Ok
Isn't that how talking works...?
@@cartersmith9842 you make things up in conversation? thats just lying
You canât understand things you know nothing aboutâŠ
The funny part about them bringing in what Mars and Venus mean versus what the planet actually is, is the fact that Mars and Venus are just named after Roman gods. That's where those traits come from which can then be traced back to Greek gods Ares and Aphrodite which are the gods that Mars and Venus are based off of. Which if you continue to go back you can trace certain gods like Aphrodite to even Ishtar due to the geological and cultural shifts of the cultures.
They are not based on the actual planet, just gods that people made thousands of years ago to explain natural phenomena that they could not understand at the time or represented abstract concepts like war or love.
So what you're saying is, there is even less of a correlation between the actual cosmological bodies and the claims of astrology to be able to interpret them, than they claim? gasp.
I agree, so Astrology has nothing to do with "Astro" at all. Everything they believe in are just made up concept.
Astrologers: Energy and Vibes, Yo!
Astronomers:
Not all astronomers act like a$$h0l3s.
Astronomers: So are you saying that Astrology is more like Psychology?
Astrologers: Yes
Psychologists: Are we a joke to you?
Masters in psychology here... that part made me mad pissed off not gonna lie. Psychology is definitely science backed and peer reviewed!
đ€Łđ€Łđ€Ł
Both psychology and astrology are behavioral based practices. To claim they are the exact same is ridiculous but there is some connections which should be noted. They both track the complexity of human nature and I would agree that psychology is a science
more so than astrology by far (professional astrologer here). Many astrologers also collect empirical data throughout their studies so it is on par with sciences but because it is all interpretation and so closely linked to spirituality it becomes invalidated by science.
@@elizabethbauer5255 yes, yes it is.
I suggest we'd change it from psychologists to psychics, that seems more accurateđź
The fact the astronomers managed to keep a straight face listening to this nonsense... I admire them.
I see burger star, this means your child is gonna become obese
@@OHOE1 lol
@@OHOE1 MF what? LMAO
Theyâre being real nice on camera
@@OHOE1 lmao đ
"I'm a spiritual analyst".
Unemployed, got it.
How tf did none of the astromers not call out that dude for calling the sun and moon planets? This shows how "scientifically motivated" astrology and astrologers are
That girl did not just compare psych and actual therapy with astrology. Oof. Thank you to the astronomer that corrected her.
As a Psychology student, I died inside a little bit.
There are many people who view therapy in the same way people view astrology. So yes I did. I am a therapy student so using my knowledge of both I stated my own opinion.
I mean, I think that astrology, in regards to its psychology aspects, can be somewhat helpful to those who practice it. However, everything else that says planets and stars can affect how we should feel or what we should do is plain gibberish, then rendering astrology unnecessary at the end of the day.
"psychology is a soft science" says literally only people who have never heard an actual psychologist speak .-.
I was really irritated when Ebony categorized psychology and astrology in an equal level. Psychology is far more deeper and important that what people believe in, in astrology
"I'm never wrong. I don't miss"
*5 seconds later*
"Well that's when the interpretation comes into play if they say it's not true"
So you just wiggle things about until it's so vague that anything can fit and then you take a mallet to it until it does?
Yep. They even said it in the beginning. Astrology is just about finding personality models that resonate with you, i.e. give you the feeling of recognizing some aspect of your personality in them. It makes people believe that they understand themselves because it labels previously unlabeled psychological occurrences for them.
@@synlion it's just confirmation bias, the game lol.
Itâs literally cold reading. Thatâs what âpsychicsâ do to convince people that they have paranormal abilities.
@@theotherleonaygirl yup yup
it's called the barnum effect. their "visions" and conclusions/interpretations are so vague and general that it could apply to just about anyone and people think it's true.
11:13 Does he think we are living in Avatar The last airbender? The moon isn't magically connected to water.
5:47 the astronomer trying to stifle a laugh is so wholesome
Id like to see belivers scientists vs atheist scientists.
wouldnât be that interesting imo
I WOULD LOVE THIS
Not as bad. Believer scientists do not claim religion is a fact based science.
THIS
I SECOND THIS
"she's so annoying, she's definitely an asparagus"
Are you sure she's not a Capri Sun?
đ€Łđ€Łđ€Ł
she must be a tauros pokemon im pretty sure
Yall are wrong, dead giveaway she's a Bob Saggetarian
@@lianives3594 she definitely not a tourist
This video is genuinely so wholesome just because of how civil, nice, and respectful everyone's being. They're not saying "YOU'RE WRONG!!!", they're saying "I disagree".
Then I check the comments and everyone is just freaking out over nothing.
totally! i thought we would have a chill comment section. this vid was so respectful. i thought the two girls into astrology kept it very real saying it is not a science. and i think they found middle ground - just because something is not a science doesnt mean it does not have any value in it
Yes I also saw this now that the comments full of projections đź. Maybe it's kinda triggering to some that some people don't expect astrologers are more in their zone but also practically able to pick up the conversation and nuances about science in general đ. So mad over nothing.
The comments are definitely projecting. Both sides were very respectful, especially the astronomers, I really don't think they were "holding back" from insulting the astrologists. They all laid out their arguments and explained why they disagree in a civil manner.
Wow that was actually a great discussion
These astrologists remind me of politicians, they can talk and talk without ever saying anything.
They also contradict themselves with their own logic, which is also like modern politicians
fr
the astronomers were the sensible moderates, and the astrologists were the alt right and woke left lmao
@@rocketman3770 make way for the enlightened centrist, everyone
@@taylosaurus make way for woke Taylor, her entitled opinion supersedes all common folk lmfao
@@rocketman3770 I never specified my stance lol, way to prove me right sir
The girl studying psychology sadly represented psychology in a misleading light. Psychology IS based on the scientific method, we DO have theories that guilds our research and these theories and hypotheses are then restructured if they are not supported by evidence. Yes, it is a soft science, but NO it is not comparable to astrology.
louder!!!!
I disagree, I donât believe it is a soft science whatsoever, that is hard science, as complicated and intricate as physics chemistry or biology, honestly itâs people like this that water down its significance because the real physiologist (unlike the girl in this video, who clearly said that in order to fair over some sort of credibility) have done remarkable work and have conducted and observe crazy experiments that deserve more recognition, not someone that poses as one just to undermine all of the work of great minds that came before
@@brandonsolanes9217 Thanks for that! I completely agree with you regarding how you describe the science. When it comes to soft vs. hard science, I guess that depends on the definition you go by, as it is still quite vague, and what aspects you want to focus on. Main point - psychology is a science and I'm glad that other people agree with me on the fact that the girl merely tried to make herself seem more credible.
Coming from a scientist in a biological field, I 100% agree that psychology is a science that is based on the scientific method! I think people get hung up on the fact that what was once considered fact may not prove to be true in the future. But that's science for ya. Lol
Psychology is a science
So I recently heard a proffesional 'mentalist' (a guy who performs all sorts of tricks on stage that make his audience 'think' he can read minds, move something without touching it,....) but he sees his craft as a performance for entertainment. He tells his audiance very clearly it's all tricks, but when you see it you can never see how he could possibly do it, so it still works. He talked a lot about the 7 principles stage magic is based on, which is essentially 7 basic ways to trick people. The astrologists mentioned quite q few which were painfully similar to his on-stage 'mind-reading' techniques. Which are ofcourse nothing more than suggestions, questions the participant fills in, broad and general statements,...
I truly believe these astrologists have thaught themselves these while actually believing their knowledge comes from their charts. the real magic is in how you present whatever your chart says (or your 2 year olds, shitty drawing for that matter) to your client, and guide them in your communication to fill in whatever you said in a way that resonates with them.
There was a show on Sci fi channel years ago called mind control with Darren Brown that was very similar to this. They interviewed a ton of people asking mystical sounding gobbedly gook about their lives and gave them a paper describing their "life and personality in detail" and they all thought it perfectly described who they are as a person. They gave everyone the same paper. That's always stuck with me.
It's like kids trying to prove to you that the tooth fairy is real at the age of 17.
Astronomers: âIâm mad because I slept in and was late for work.â
Astrologers: âIâm mad because Mercury is in retrograde and Marsâ moon is in its 5th phase causing a shift in behavioural actionsâŠbut what can I say, Iâm an Aquarius lol.â
I donât think they know mars has moons
đ€Ł
HHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAH
Lmao đ
LMFAOO
Ianâs response about being affected by celestial objects is so wholesome and sweetđ
Thank you so much! This comment has me smiling from ear to ear :)
@@ianlauerastro you had great takes Ian
@@ianlauerastro i love what you said, and i think you would like this poem by walt whitman!
âWhen I heard the learnâd astronomer,
When the proofs, the figures, were ranged in columns before me,
When I was shown the charts and diagrams, to add, divide, and measure them,
When I sitting heard the astronomer where he lectured with much applause in the lecture-room,
How soon unaccountable I became tired and sick,
Till rising and gliding out I wanderâd off by myself,
In the mystical moist night-air, and from time to time,
Lookâd up in perfect silence at the stars.â
@@ianlauerastro nah kidding u were delusionate
@@yogibear3761 Hold your horses m8, arent you going too far calling him "delusionate"?
I feel sorry for the astronomers who had to listen and pretend to sympathize with this nonsense
I feel sorry for the astrologers who had to sit through the limited mindset that the astronomers could do, it was hilarious, how the astronomers could understand simply because they have been highly conditioned in America to think they way that they do, they only understand logic from the perspective of the small worlds they come from. They continued to call astrology and science even though that astrologers didn't say that exactly, Astrology is a language, it has helped many elevate, and have put som many in position of power that would be considered unprecedented. But I don't expect these people to understand that because they operate on the lower mind, not to say that the lower or higher mind is better, but that how the it is operated. they are only here to understand the world for the current logic that exist, the astrologer are here to understand the world beyond the logic of their world, thats why they have a hard time connecting, Astrologer is very simple when you break it down properly, its like an ancient text that only some can understand
â@@kmt8825 Isn't that cherry picking?
Astronomers: Start by asking questions to understand the other's point of view and build up from there.
Astrologists: "I felt vibes, therefore you're wrong."
The astrologers are trying so hard to support their side. And astronomers are just chilling, I love it.
yeah, because the astrologers are the misinterpreted ones. (no i don't think astrology is a science)
Because one thing is real, the other thing is just belief made to be real.
I didn't find all of the astronomers chill at all to be honest đ
How can you not want to "try hard" in proving your side of the spectrum when its so heavily misrepresented? Astrology is like a color wheel, we have the sun signs - what everyone practically knows - which would be considered as the color red for an example. But then, as you learn more, you'll find out that there's in fact many different hues of red, which differentiates the people of that category. Along with people having more than one color in their birth chart as well. If you imagine the birth chart as a painting, then obviously no person's painting is going to look exactly the same. There's going to be a variety of color splashed about it in varies ways that can only be unique to yourself, based on your houses and planarity placements.
This is to only explain what Astrology is, not prove that its scientific based, but to at least show that its more than just saying "Omg you're such a Virgo!" or "Eww I can't date him, because he's a Scorpio." Its like saying that this person is only [insert nationality], when they're that but also so much more which defines their identity; religion, culture, ethnicity, geography, etc.
The astronomers werenât chill tho lol There were some moments where you could tell they were tense especially the guy in the middle
Ian: Iâm not an evolutionary biologist
Nina: Iâm a cancer rising
Idk why this was just so funny to me đ
Woooooo đ€Łđ€Łđ€Ł
@@stackenitup87 ive watched that clip 20 times lmfaoooo
I see ian and nina i think vampire diaries đ
Just the complete polar opposite
Loll
I love how Nina talks (same name as mine too â€) and I agree with her WHOLEHEARTEDLY. I love her.
I think both are here to stay.
Out of the astrologers, Ebony was the most level-headed. It seemed like she more so understood she is reading people and trying to be therapeutic rather than full-on saying astrology is accurate.
She also said she was a psychologist, or has a psychology degree. So maybe that's why. She's familiar with working with evidence-backed research and can distinguish between when something being more analytical or interpretive. She definitely had the most interesting perspective out of the astrologers.
Fr
What kinda name is Ebony lol
@@josearguettabitoni6448 its pretty normal name.. get your mind out of the gutter, not everything needs to be sexualized
Definitely yes .. but she also implied that practicing psychology and therapy is not evidence backed which is a major red flag đ©đ©
This resembled a compassionate parent trying to understand the ramblings of a young teenager that doesn't know themself.
more like a con, saying whatever people like to hear to get paid
đđ€Łđđ€Łđđ
except they were grown ass adults
"Sure but we have plenty of umm anecdotal I guess you could say evidence" dear lord haha
I hate the overuse and incorrect usage of the word energy in stuff like astrology and pseudoscience.
My first thought exactly
My heart died when she said psychology doesnât use the scientific method... it is a real science people !
it b is kind a sad that you are studying psychology , the real psychologists were open minded in those days
@@confidential303 Your sudden reponse after 4 months is news to me
Yeah.. I don't know why she said that
Its ability to experiment effectively is very limited by ethics and uncontrollable variables, it doesnât sit at the same standards as the natural sciences
Ehhhhh, speaking as an individual pursuing a graduate degree, Iâd have to say that there are plenty of individuals in the scientific community who are skeptical of psychologyâs status as a science.
Astronomer: âGravitational forces between far away celestial bodies are negligibleâ
Astrology: âHow do you know that?â
Astronomer: âIâve studied physics for many years to understand how gravity worksâ
Astrology: âSure, well we have plenty of anecdotal evidenceâ
Is this girl smoking crack? Like wtf makes you think thatâs a valid argument?đ
Why couldnât she explain exactly why? I see her point, but the astronomer sounded silly herself if you want to go down that route.
@UCxKCdrCfTJ8tL1KtXv3agZQ because the force of gravity has an equation that is dependent on distance u goddamn star clown
@@samba9450 if youâre talking to me, then her stating that sheâs studied physics for many years doesnât really have anything to do with that. And it should still have some effect (otherwise, the law does not apply to all situations, which should be the point within their framework, from my understanding and what they put off/communicate- does it cease to exist when itâs far away? Can we say that if it essentially doesnât show up in certain instances that it has been disproven?). As was brought up, there does seem to be some sort of correlation between the moon and womenâs menstrual cycles. And why focus simply upon gravitational forces? Physicists themselves canât properly group gravity in with the other 3 fundamental forces. Thereâs so much they donât know. I donât really believe in astrology either btw, though Iâm still open to the possibility of at least parts of it being legitimate... Though overall, I still think itâs unholy, or at least- it isnât my place to judge someone completely off of their zodiac sign or whatever other metric they use- especially when doctors push for c-sections and/or induced births.
@@user-pe2yx9kt4e that astronomer seemed to be using logically flawed argumentation anyway. She brought up beetlejuice being 400-600 light years away and how it going supernova wouldn't effect them immediately. She's implying that somehow what the astrologers call "energy" is faster than the speed of light. If she studied physics for as long as she said she had, i would hope she would realize how dangerous that implication is and how it would undermine a lot of physics concepts that our world has been built upon today like relativity
â@@josha1349 Where did you get the idea that she implied that this "energy" was faster than the speed of light?
She used that argument solely to disprove how something very far away in space (a celestial body) literally can not affect you at a certain point in time (like your birth).
She used a celestial body going supernova 650 lightyears away as a way to disprove that it can't affect you, since it would've happened a long, long time ago for us.
She's saying it can't affect you, quite literally the opposite of what you're claiming she's saying.
The astrologers would be claiming that it's travelling faster than the speed of light, since they're the ones claiming that the celestial bodies are affecting them. She's claiming it wouldn't.
I feel like you're putting words in her mouth or just simply misunderstood what she said.
I wanted to be so decisive while watching this but I just couldnât. What a great episode â€
This is pure comedy in both side lmaođ, but a amazingly more on the Astronomer side đź
If I hear "energies" 1 more time I'm gonna scream
E...ah, fuck it.
@@kwesibruno Challenge everything!
La energia
Oof thatâs some strong energies I feel coming your way. Whatâs your sign? Lol
Energy đđ
Astrology works because they have a large list of qualities that 'could' apply to basically every person.
Ur right
You should look up your birth chart
@@kiraparson2746 I shouldn't
You know what, it doesn't work like that, I've seen people sh*tting on astrology too much in this comment section. If you don't know someone that actually studied astrology than do not talk about it like you know it so well, no you didn't find the trope. What you are talking about is the commercial and cheap astrology. Astrologers study for a reason, please be respectful (from person who is currently studying astrology)
@@carlacista242 studying astrology is like studying religion. If it makes you happy go for it but don't treat it as a real science and don't let it affectbthe way you treat others.
Astrology is emotional and spiritual with no bases in science and astronomy is pure science thatâs repeatable everytime and you can see it every nightâŠboth are so incredibly different that they donât really deserve to be on the same shelf in the book store lol
Vastly different but had civil convo. Yet my family can't
Ashley is so sharp. She always realises whatâs going on when there is a miscommunication and can put it into words spot on. Apart from her obvious expertise of course.
Yeees
@@inthebegninnging5166 bruh thatâs sus asf đ€Ąđ€Ą
Right
@@ikebeckman1074 Frđ
true
Astrology should be considered as religion at this point tbh. It's literally, LITERALLY a belief. It's torally fine if you find it suitable for you, but recognize it as a belief. If abrahamic religious folks can accept the whole world telling them that their scripture â science, then astrologers shouldn't get butthurt to be considered the same thing honestly.
Strongly agree!
You canât be serious đ
Jasmine, i think you need to specify what you are talking about
Sooo you do realize itâs based on a both Roman and Egyptian mythology (religion)
100% agree
can the astrologists please read the astronomists birth charts? i would love to hear their reaction/thoughts on the astrologists readings!
The guy affirming astrology is science because he thinks so got me soo annoyed, but the girl saying psychology isn't science really did it for me. Hello?? Do you even know what science is??
âSo, whatâs your degree-Iâm sorry, whatâs your definition of science?â Freudian slip, much? đ
lmao
Timestamp? đżâš
@@bobba1968 7:33
@@bobba1968 7:33
@@marks.5207 Dang how were u 58 seconds before me
"I'm not an evolutionary biologist so I don't know-"
"Sure sure sure... I'm a cancer riiising..."
11:48 Its authentic
@@JabranImran đ€Łđ€Ł
đ€Łđ€Łđ€Łđ€Łđđđđđ
@@myprettygirl91 đđ watched that like "here we gooo đ"
this part made me laugh so damn hard
The astrologers shouldâve done the astronomers charts and then they couldâve said whether or not it was accurate and if the astronomers believed a little more.
Thatâs like asking can professors in theology and Christians see eye to eye? One studies and examines it, the other gets their own meaning from it.
Psych Student here: psychology is a science and we use the scientific method - and yes we use it for treatment too! If it werenât based in science it would be unethical to implicate said treatment on ppl. Donât listen to her, psychology is a field in science, research, and health/medicine
Hence the whole idea of evidence-based practice that's gained a lot of momentum nowadays. Maybe she was referring to non-standardised therapies like psychodynamic and stuff where you can't really have the same level of evidence in why they work and all that. But you can still see whether it's helped people and compare it to a placebo and control group, and then you technically still have scientific data...
But I do get what she meant, cause like it happens a lot of times where you can just have different results depending on the people that participate in the study. And it's not like all the replicated studies get published so there's a lot of info we wouldn't have...
Im sorry but psych is not a science, replicability fails almost everytime in psych experiments.
I'd like to believe that, but so many foundational studies such as the Stanford prison study a were done with a terrible methodology, and now it's unethical to repeat them so we are basing our understanding off of faulty assumptions.
â@@leorkoubi4626Oh just wait until you find out what WWII Germany/Japan's 'scientific endeavors' looked like LOL
Remember, the accepted model of the solar system used to be geocentrist.
Science is what WE can interpret of the natural world. Science is NOT some miracle method of unveiling every possible quality of a subject with absolute objectivity and detail ... There are bound to be thousands upon thousands of 'errors' yet to come in our journey to understand the universe.
yesss
as someone who is studying psychology and therapy, i was so mad when she called psychology a 'soft science' and equated it with astrology. astrology is a pseudoscience. psychology does have a long way to go compared to other sciences, but that's only because it's new. not because it's, in any way, similar to astrology. someone with their mind-set studying therapy and being a future therapist scares me.
Psychology is extremlly useful, but it is a soft science since psychological hypothesis cant be empirically and 100% proven.
Literally, one of the first things I was taught when I did Psychology at University was that Astrology was a pseudoscience since it was based on faith and didn't use the scientific method.
it is soft science though if you compare it to biology. it has a long way to go like you said, but i do agree its nothing like astrology. astrology is basically like religion lmao
Psychology is considered a social science just like Economics, which is respectable
Itâs is extremely ethically and practically challenging to isolate independent variables when it comes to human beings, which is something that must be done over and over again in studies for the science to become predictive, meaning psychology is still a soft science. There are still strong correlational findings, obtained through psychology by employing the scientific method, that can be shown over time to be extremely relevant for practical use. There will be exceptions, but itâs useful. Astrology on the other hand does not stand up to any stress test employed using the scientific method, often being beaten out by randomness in tests of predictive ability.
I just wish astrologers stayed in their lane and didnât improperly hijack scientific disciplines to try and legitimize their otherwise harmless hobby. When the astrologer dude brought thermodynamics into it I was unamused đ€Ș
I find it so funny how they introduce themselves astronomers âliterally has zero proofâ and astrologers are like â the crystal energy of Jupiterâs is making me think about spaghetti for my own safetyâ
11:29 my boy was short circuiting on the explanation of tides and moon đđđ
Just needed to clarify that psychology is a science that IS rooted in the scientific method. And ethical therapy modalities are ALL evidence-based. Social sciences use the scientific method as well smh
And SHE is the one who studied Psychology! đ«
Yes!!! Thank you!! That made me so mad. Masters in psychology here.
Yes.
And still, not the shrinks I went to didn't treat sh*t
The pyschs asked me questions to "treat myself"
Healthy gamer gg taught that pyschs don't do crawp
they are considered soft sciences because it's near impossible to ethically conduct experiments on people and control for millions of variables but definitely agree that it shouldnt be lumped together with astrology
When you make a psychological test it works, when you make an astrology test it works (after 20 attempts) yeah these ppl are delusional
No, astrology is not a science
@@TheGubernatis you can study it, but that doesn't mean astrology is a science in any way, it's been proven it's not a science
Adara Sanchez Rosado if it was proven itâs not a science, it wouldnât be a question. Donât say something you donât know
@@TheGubernatis just coz u can study and understand something doesn't make it science
@@TheGubernatis Science (from Latin scientia 'knowledge') is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of *testable explanations* and predictions about the universe.
@@astrida111 it was proven, but astrology stills around because 1. It makes money 2. People find it "interesting" and "mysterious" and 3. Lots of poeple fall for it and don't care that it's not a science, so don't YOU talk about things you don't know
11:01 her face when she realized that he wasn't gonna give the answer she thought he would hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
This girl said âsoftâ science đ