Simon Jordan GOES IN on Scott Parker and believes A.F.C. Bournemouth were right to sack him 😳🔥
Vložit
- čas přidán 29. 08. 2022
- Scott Parker has been sacked by A.F.C. Bournemouth and is the first Premier League manager to go. talkSPORT's Jim White, Simon Jordan & Trevor Sinclair discuss!
Want content first & fastest? ✅ SUBSCRIBE here: / talksport
Enjoyed this video? 😍
Check out some of our BEST stuff!
⚽ INCREDIBLE CALL🔥 You have to hear this 𝙚𝙥𝙞𝙘 call from a very, VERY frustrated Manchester United fan - • INCREDIBLE CALL🔥 You h...
⚽ SIMON JORDAN vs KELL BROOK😱 Simon Jordan tells Kell Brook that Amir Khan will beat him! - • SIMON JORDAN V KELL BR...
⚽️ SIMON JORDAN vs DEREK CHISORA ROUND 2🔥 Derek Chisora calls Simon Jordan a "TELEPHONE TOUGH GUY!" - • JORDAN vs CHISORA ROUN...
⚽ JAKE PAUL vs EDDIE HEARN💪 Jake Paul says boxers are easier to fight than MMA fighters! - • JAKE PAUL vs EDDIE HEA...
⚽ AMAZING😂 Jason Cundy pranked by Darren Farley with fake Steven Gerrard interview - • AMAZING! Jason Cundy p...
⚽ "BE QUIET & NOT SAY A BAD WORD ABOUT HIM!"😳 Mourinho gives his honest opinion on his former players
👂Listen to talkSPORT LIVE: talkSPORT.com/Live
🖥️Personal website: /talksport.com/
📲Twitter: / talksport
📷Instagram: talksport?...
👤Facebook: / talksport
📱 Tik Tok: / talksport
🔴Download the talkSPORT app: talksport.com/apps/
🗣️ Want to have your say on LIVE radio and maybe even make it on our official CZcams channel? Call the show on 08717 22 33 44 (13p/min) or text 80189 (50p + charges).
🔎Want to see if you feature on our channel? Check out our Best talkSPORT callers playlist: • The BEST talkSPORT Cal...
#afcbournemouth
#scottparker
#talkSPORT
#PremierLeague
#ChampionsLeague
#FACUP - Sport
Honestly if you're a footballer or a manager and you manage to go through your whole career without Simon Jordan going in on you that's a bigger achievement than winning the Ballon D'or
Lol 🤣
😂🤣🤣🤣 absolutely right
Rohith u are hilarious 🤣🤣🤣
i swear this guy is the biggest hippy
Simon is a flip flop tbh. On a Tuesday he'll be there ranting and raving about Man City destroying the game, the super league, money destroying the game etc.
And then on Wednesday criticising Norwich for playing within their budget.
Parker rolled the dice, he obviously knew funds would have been low, but he tried to put pressure on the board by going public knowing he would either get sacked or get more players.
@@danwilkes8964 if he gets sacked and paid off then he doesn't have to watch his win record dwindle .
Scotty was right!
He got the first option…the sack 😀
Football manager strategy
@@sarginsonjon am sure Everton and Aston villa have probably already contacted him just in case they wanna make a move. Rn he's sitting in the catbird seat
Exactly. He knew exactly what was going to happen
11:25 is what Jordan's rant is all about; losing a shedload of his money at Palace. The owner's pain he's talking about is his own.
He understand the owner's side of story because he lived through it in the past. No Premier League owners or board of directors are so incompetent enough not to communicate with the managers with regards to budget. Parker definitely knew about it and realised his players and his abilities are limited, so he took a gamble by publicly addressing the lack of funds to push the board or get the sack. In the end he got the latter and that takes some b*lls to do that for both Parker and the board.
because football fans, pundits, players, and managers try to consistently and completely ignore or override it.
Rarely do i agree with Simon Jordan but i'm with him on this one there's NO way Scott Parker hasn't had a conversation with the board/owners about transfers and they must have explained the situation to him. If your vision does not align with the clubs walk away or get on with your job!
So many psychic people on here. How does anyone know what has been discussed? Maybe he is speaking out because he was promised everything yet received very little!!!
Parker was never going to walk away from his contract. By doing it this way in the media he has enabled the player to not perform. Now that he is sacked he will still get a payout.
Conte is an amazing manager who speaks his mind in press conferences. It's important but I guess Parker doesn't have the trophies to back it up
@@kyronne1 exactly! trying to operate like Conte and Jose without the clout or success to back it up. This will only put off other clubs within his level from hiring him in the future. Should have just kept it short and sweet 'we were not good enough today' no need to elaborate further, anyone with a brain can already see that Bournemouth are not equipped to survive in the premier league
@@michealdexter1188 sooo one person made a valod comment amd u dont reply to him ?
AFCB season ticket holder - Well said Simon. 100% agree. We’ve been out with the ‘begging bowl’ and nearly went out of business. Like all things in life, everyone has to live within their means. I wish Mr Parker well but he’s clearly not for us. 🍒⚽️👍
If you get destroyed 9-0 then right after the game you say "I'm not surprised", that's pretty much the end right there....
na. its just 3 points. Man united often got hannered 6 and 7 nil. Ferguson generally won the next match with the players
@@denisdaly1708 OFTEN during Ferguson‘s era???? 6 or 7? Mate what are you on about
@@kingvid4223 i think he's talking about the games he played on his playstation
@@jhpfdijtuiweruot 💀 exactly mate like what is my guy on about
@@denisdaly1708 when.thats mince
It's more of an issue of how some owners can't financially keep up anymore. Given the way Forest, Fulham, Newcastle, Brentford, Leeds and others spend now... if your plan is to get promoted and spend nothing you'll get relegated by October.
yes, that is the reality. 20 25 years ago it was much different
@@JordiBoy_ Not strange at all. His point is you have to spend millions just to keep up with those teams, let alone the top 6. As for West Ham, why would anyone mention them?
@@JordiBoy_ Bournemouth's spending should never be compared to the big 6, just like they aren't competing to stay up against the big 6. West Ham finished 7th... they don't need the same reinforcements as a championship squad
@@shingetsu10 Exactly, you got my point perfectly. I also have no clue what he means about West Ham
fulham spent 120 million a few years ago and went back down. That is even worse than not spending. I dont think you HAVE to buy to stay up, brentford didnt spend much last year, Leeds didnt spend much when they came up, and same with sheffield united.
The man had horrific run in, 3 of the "Big Six" out of 4 games, with a shoestring budget and a board who doesn't back him. Who the hell do Bournemouth think they are as a club, first Howe and then Parker. They don't deserve the status as a Prem club with that lower league mentality.
Nothing to do with results
@@GIBBO4182 His comments are a consequence of the results they've had, thusly it has everything to do with results.
@@mrshankly213 really? That’s a tedious link!
@@GIBBO4182 lmao
@@mrshankly213 no, his comments as Simon says are as a result of whatever conversations were had behind closed doors. He decided to use the media as leverage and it failed. He gets a payoff will get to keep his reputation and will undoubtedly land elsewhere on his feet
If football managers could sack club owners , Simon Jordan would have been fired by every manager he ever appointed . Whether Parker is a genuine PL coach is another matter , but he was certainly not backed in the transfer market , and his comments are justified and 100% honest , if you fail to prepare , then you prepare to fail .
Yeah he needed backup. But the matter is that he should’ve discussed his points inside the meeting room not out in public. You meet the man, present your requirements, try convincing him, if you win the negotiation you get what you want and if you don’t, you either do what you can with what you have or leave the club. No point whining about it after being unable to conclude the discussion with the man in charge
championship manager at best
How about Scott Parker becomes an owner and puts his money on the line.
@@dudebro3250 if you become an owner of a football club then that's what your REQUIRED TO DO....otherwise sell and buy a cornenershop and penny pinch
@@lowercentenary so lose as much of your money as possible. Spend spend spend. Try and get the club out of business. Really smart.
Simon is bang on here…
Agreed with everything that Scott said in his interview. A very honest statement.
That is not what honesty is about.
Like Simon says,they have had that conversation in the boardroom already and Scott must have agreed with the Club's position seeing how he did not hand in his resignation.
That he will come out to the media and says the opposite is NOT INTEGRITY. That is exactly the definition of "being two face" or "backbiting " .
Also like Simon says,when these football managers keep going on and on about wanting more money, do they know what the finances of the club is? Is it some money they have left to the owners to keep?
Managers are starting to think that they own clubs but they don't - they are just mere employees.
@@kcetebe8012 First off, that is all mere speculation that they had that “conversation”. Ideally, clubs typically do have that conversation but do we know THEY did? Secondly, the coach is very much in the right to speak out especially when coaches nowadays are easily replaced after a bad start to a season. The culture of running a club has changed: to receiving immediate results and making immediate profit. That’s why coaches push for help so they could deliver in that fashion.
"When the fit hits the shan..." Lol... Brilliant from Simon!
i could listen to Simon all day long,
hes a Top bloke in my book..
cheers talksport from Thailand
It's a pretty crude spoonerism, but okay.
@@jnicholls21 All spoonerisms are crude, Karen. 😉🤡
I mean, 9-0 is an aberration but other than that Parker's results were fine (won his only winnable game vs Villa). But after he came out and said he had no confidence in the players, it seems fair game to sack him and get someone in who believes they can make a go of it.
Exactly my thoughts. I was surprised with his after match comments and I think it was those which got him the sack. I hope he gets another team soon as he seems to be a good manager.
Yep I agree... He's more or less said 'well what do you expect, look at what I've got'.. That's no way for a manager to be with his squad so getting rid of him was the only option.
@@delanodegenie6970 he is talking the truth
@@P.Rick316 He maybe but you don't do it in public and embarrass your chairman.
Southampton weathered two 9-0 losses with Hasenhuttl, and that's working out okay. Keeping these sides up is a success.
That was like a counselling session for Simon Jordan
I agree with Simon Jordan 100%. If a manager doesn’t like what the owner is doing, he should resign instead of criticizing his boss publicly.
Completely disagree... if your management team [owners] decisions mean that the season will become a train crash then they need to be told. Again and again.
Broooooo r u joking or Nottingham and Fulham all strengthen and Bournemouth did ehat
I watched Fulham when he was manager a few times and Bournemouth a few times and he actually had them playing good football. What do people expect from Bournemouth ? No one likes loosing 9-0 but someone was bound to get a hiding off Liverpool sooner or later and it happened to be them. Look at the 3 teams they played this season … a hell of a tough start for anyone that. Sacked to soon !
He wasn’t sacked because of the results though he was sacked for saying he hasn’t had enough backing, watch the video and keep up!
Fulham fans coined his football “Parker ball” because it was so boring and lacked any attacking. He is almost completely disliked for his time at Fulham because we played so beneath the level of player we have. This is the manager that refused to play mitrovic. Compare how Fulham have done since silva took over. Parker is an unbelievably negative manager in tactics and man management.
If the owners are willing to sack this soon I don't see any hope for them to stay up.
Don't know why people say this, his style of football is vile, and his Bournemouth team last season underachieved.
He wasn't sacked because of the results, he was sacked for dragging board disagreements into the circus of media. Unlike at Fulham, when he disagreed with the board, he walked away. Here he tried to sink the ship, with everyone onboard, to save himself. He should've been professional and worked with what he got, or he could've just walked away again.
It's Bournemouth, it's not like they promised him a big transfer budget. Most of that "promotion money" goes to salaries and "other" expenditures. If you don't really have much of any other source of revenue (by EPL standards), then there's really not much left, say £50m at best. They've signed Tavernier for £10m, Senesi for £12m and three more on free. They're limited to the amount of players who wants to sign and they can't afford to overpay.
- Fulham is ultra wealthy.
- Forest is a massive club in comparison to Bournemouth, much higher revenue from ticket sales to shirt sales, and most of their players went elsewhere before the season, freeing up wages massively. Forest also has a generous owner and they'll most likely sign attractive main, sleeve and training kit sponsors.
- Bournemouth just signed a main sponsor deal with Dafabet worth only £4 million and training kit sponsor probably not worth much more than your own salary, so obviously, with that kind of money, they're not going anywhere other than back down.
Pretty sure the board made it clear to him when he came knocking on the door for more reinforcements at some point.
Now he regrets leaving Fulham and drewls at Forest. Parker is correct, Bournemouth's squad is nowhere near Premier League level, and even if they spent another 50 million on 2-3 more players, it just won't be enough to stay up.
He was frustrated, jealous and had a public tantrum. He was rightfully sacked.
"When the fit hits the shan" 😂🤣😂😂🤣🤣😂🤣🤣😂😂🤣
Simon Jordan speak the straight talk day after day man!
He talks polarized nonsense.
@@davidr1138 he always seems to make sense to me
11:18 “When the fit hits the shan” 😂 Simon Jordan is a gift.
You've gotta love live radio LOL
I love how in football managers time and time again fall on the sword, yes they were beaten 9-0 however the team he put out was a team capable of not losing by such a margin. It's about time football was a basic salary and the rest were on performance base increases.
Spot on lad. I’ve been saying the same this for ages, much much smaller salary’s with big performance bonuses
He wasn't fired for the results, he was fired for going against the board publicly.
@@popmonika If they're not backing him he has a right too. He's the one who takes the flack
£10 for every successful pass
Sadly if it came In what would then happen would someone else would start a football organisation and all the players would move to that
If I was a player for Bournemouth I would’ve been dismayed to hear Parker’s interview after the Liverpool match. He essentially said they have no chance. That may be true, but as a leader you have to try and inspire your people. They’re already up against it. The least you can do is give them hope or belief.
He knows that the owners have lots and lots of money, who are giving Parker an impossible job
Simon absolutely rims club owners it’s comedy. Suprise he hasn’t got his ‘team glazers’ polo on the rim job
well he knows a lot more than you or any of us in the comment section
@@24SparrowJack he was the owner of Palace when they went into administration, he knows how to f&ck a club up.
@@24SparrowJack got pubes in your teeth bro
@@NLGNATHAN exactly his hate for players and managers is unparalleled
@@NLGNATHAN would you do better though
Parker deserved better. He’s a decent fella and the board should have a good look at themselves. Look at forest making a good go of things. Bournemouth have 3 points and that’s not the end for the world right now.
Deserved better how? He is a multimillionaire football manager. Not some kid working in sweat shops 18 hours a day for less than minimum wage.
@@dudebro3250 Doesn’t matter if it’s a millionaire he still a hard-working guy who’s got feelings. He got Bournemouth back to the Premier League and this is how they treat him.
That’s not okay. If they don’t invest in the team, they could have Pep and will still get relegated.
Decent fella? You know him well, yeah?
@@lebontv6921 He would have known what the budget was, he should have walked if it a figure not acceptable to him, but then you don’t get the payout of a sack if he did that
I rarely agree with Simon, but he has a point and I actually agree with him, respect your place and position, at the same time respect who pays you and players
I have to agree with Simon Jordan, I’ve got sacked for something very similar. U gonna get sacked anyway for not delivering. Might as well go early
Problem with Simon is because he used to be an owner he’s always bias in favour of the owner
The problem with Simon is he was born, and still alive.
The reality is that clubs are paid for with real money and most owners want a return on their money, like any investment. Unless you’re lucky to be owned by Arabs who are doing this for a bit of fun and its just chump change to them, the pool of money isn’t endless and the club needs to be run responsibly. My club almost died due to irresponsible spending. Sure I want success on the pitch but I don’t want those managing my club to gamble with its future by making investments they can’t afford. I guess most fans don’t care and don’t want to see that its a business.
He always sides with ownership
Blokes a clown
@@LeoDragon34 theres a difference between wanting success on a pitch and blatantly allowing your club to drop down because u can then keep the massive promotion bonus and repeat in 2 years time when ur promoted again. owners lining their pockets
"Know your place. Do as you're told" Simon Jordan.
It's TRUE though, you can't just do whatever the hell you want, respect for the people paying you very very good money every week is needed!
And he’s 100% right
@@NeverTrustaSocialist
Ofcourse
Once again SJ bang on the money. Perfect analogy about the player/manager dynamic and how it shouldnt be any different for manager/owner.
Hes not though, owning a football club is not the same as owning a normal business.
He's literally never been more wrong in an opinion and completely blowing things out of proportion based off of irrelevant past experiences from a terrible failed stint as an owner. But his fanbase are low IQ, incompent, uneducated bin dippers who can't think rationally but that's why he's brought on: to pander to the dole dippers, so makes sense they'd think he's bang on.
Great job getting promoted 👏 you did well scott
What Simon is saying is bang on, exactly why Ten Hag doesn’t bad mouth the glazers in the press. Everyone knows the team needed players this year but he had to always say they are looking at the right players. Same as Ferguson saying there was no value in the market rubbish when he was at Utd
Ohhhhhh him.saying we need quality players and fans protesting bahahahaha but nobody saying a bad word
Scott admitted he can't do anything, basically. That's like failing a competency test.
Totally agree with you Simon. Keep up the excellent work.
When the fit hits the shan, love it
Scott Parker had a much stronger squad than Eddie Howe did when he got promoted in 2015 and he kept us up quite comfortably. Agree with Simon Jordan, a manager in any workforce is there to motivate his staff and if he feels there are weaknesses, it’s a conversation to address the issue behind closed doors, not air in front of the media to protect one’s self interests. There is a lot of Premier League experience within the Bournemouth squad and the strongest eleven on paper are more than capable of competing with teams in the lower half of the league, as shown against Villa.
Some people might say this is a stronger epl than 2015
@@perrybarbe7789 And some might say that this is a much weaker LFC side than the one Howe faced
Yeah, but every other team is stronger.
@@jhpfdijtuiweruot and they would be wrong.
@@perrybarbe7789 ...in your opinion
I felt there was going to be a "when the seagulls see the trawler..." quote from Trevor there 😂
Don't mix up your Brighton Seagulls with the Trawler ones....!
@@woodenseagull1899 or wooden seagulls for that matter 😂
A Cantona at Selhurst Park moment aimed at Sinclair would have been funnier
The rate Bournemouth are going they'll get relegated faster than Norwich
Not really
calm down they've only lost games that they should've
There's a reason why teams that come up are favourites to back down, that said as the
manager you got to back your players
Simon is right. However yesterday he said "loyalty was a silly idea". It was all about integrity. When discussing the Sunderland manager leaving his job.
But today loyalty is all the rage again.
24 hours is a long time in football. Lol.
I think there’s a difference between loyalty to a club (not the business but the football idea) and loyalty to an employer. I’m not saying I like it but Jordan clearly differentiates strongly between the two
Parker looked after himself, no manager walks away as they lose their pay off. He knew what he was doing and how he was doing it. Agree with Simon on this one but it won't change things, managers of football clubs rarely, if ever resign if a pay off is involved if they are sacked.
This. Parker is playing chess with the owners. Probably is frustrated with them and then got paid off
@@nazwansabli9275
Yes, he was right because 4 months down the line when Bournemouth are rock bottom of the table they’ll pin the blame on the manager and sack him regardless. Parker has got a good cv having just won promotion and if he’s dealt a poor hand by ruthless owners who couldn’t care less about him or the club or the fans or the players, then he’s right to leave.
@@jimmorrison8203 Agreed... and he's still young. Better get paid off and being stress-free. PS Jim Morrison is my favorite frontman of all time
Simon uses the word "loyalty" when he actually means "obedience".
Very different things.
But if that’s what he meant then he would’ve just said that
This!
@@SenorSupreme176 Maybe it's simply ignorance of proper definitions.
.but I give him more credit than that.
He dribbles rubbish a LOT.
Got to love when Simon humiliate entitled players/managers xD
Parker left Fulham because he didn't feel he was being backed enough by the owners .....look at what Silva has done in same situation.
TBH Fulham have spent twice as much as Bournemouth in the transfer window.
At least Jordan gives the owners perspective ..
Talking complete sense ..
the sad thing is the amount of fans, pundits, players, and managers who don't even want to hear it or give it credence.
I get both sides. I started his video firmly on Scott Parker's side but Simon Jordan surprisingly made fair points.
thats gulible people for you. easily convinced
I think part of the problem is the huge sums the big clubs shell out on players , on the flip side Brighton seem to have a good business and team model.
Brighton have really been through the mill over the years .
They lost their ground and were bankrupt for years, they are a success story.
Whilst Scott may have been honest in what he said ….. I’ve found myself agreeing with Simon!
I think this is the first time I disagree with Simon. Earning 170 million through promotion and only spending 22 is poor
The first time? Wow
@@shabba7829 ikr
No it isn't. Keep the core, keep the cash, have a free season in the Prenier League.
@@shabba7829 Simon Jordan hater?
@@thewiggster2 Simon Jordan fanboy?
There’s no room for honesty in modern day football.
Nah, theres always room for more honesty in everything including football, thats why we respect pundits such as Roy Keane.
@@davidr1138 that’s what I like my man….say it as it is unfortunately majority of ppl don’t like it
I'm with Parker - spoke his mind, agreed with what he said.
Why should he suck eggs for the executives??
Rule number 1 be true to yourself and i don't think he said anything incriminating anyway.
Ahh yes, no doubt if a staff member or your child were told something by you and then continued to pester you about it you'd have nonissue with that
Totally agree , we can all say what we think , we don’t live in a dictatorship, he’s an employee , don’t we all have gripes ? Don’t we all have the opportunity to publicly vent those gripes?! Totally ! It’s these rabid , capitalist morons who think we should all be bowing to our betters, getting sacked for speaking the truth.
Bournemouth hierarchy don’t care either way it seems.
It's easy to tell other people to spend money when they have no financial risk of their own.
Simon Jordan talks absolute sense. I love listening to him.
i thought the point is quite clear. parker getting sacked isn't about how much they've spent or how many games they've lost. it's about parker going in front of the mic several times already in open dissent against the owners instead of keeping his comments and suggestions in-house. if he feels the ambition of the club is suspect then the professional thing to do is to resign. if he blabs in front of the media in open opposition to the club then i don't think anyone can blame the sacking.
i agree with Simon Jordan here. Not every team can spend hundreds of millions of pounds. They just got promoted.
Crystal Palace have played the same teams as Bournemouth and have one point more
Palace have also had three windows of investment under their current manager, plus a decade of Premier League football to supplement that.
Not the same situation at all.
Having had my club almost go out of existence due to overspending, I fully understand why you shouldn't overextend and risk the club itself. Bournemouth has a tiny ground limiting income, they have to be one of the lowest spenders. Scott's belittling of his squad's abilities must've affected how they performed, not very clever.
Overspending 😂. They’ve bought one player for £12 million when they made 150 for being promoted. No one is expecting them to spend all of that but that’s fucking pathetic
There are people that actually agree with what they are saying?woww. Bournemouth got 100m when they got promoted and finished second behind fulham who were 12 points ahead of them . Fulham after winning the efl with a land slide still spent quite alot of the money to stay up and Bournemouth didnt spend any pep Guardiola himself wont be able to let them stay up
Crowd income is almost irrelevant at prem clubs...a tiny percentage of overall funds
@@MrJeffHead what a stupid comment. Next year they’ll be back in the championship with a team 2 years older from the championship 2nd place then. That’s without the better players leaving for better clubs. They will need to invest to even make a show of it
Hmm.. I thought their performance reflected the quality of opposition they had to face..
Anyway, the clever board will hopefully bring in a manager who will be content with losing games 👍
"When the fit hits the shan". I'm going to use that forever.
Spot on once again Simon, clarity!
I once was an owner Is like a boxer saying if you have never been in the ring you don't have a say 😂😂
Not all opinions are equal, no one is depriving anyone a right to voice an opinion, if you can’t read a balance sheet you won’t understand the point being made.
No it isn't
I agree with Simon. Parker is simply trying to get himself out of what he considers an embarrassing position. It's not his money. The owner and the board are trying to be sustainable.
You need to be competitive though.
The owner wants the parachute payments. It's all about the business! Football is irrelevant
@@michaelwatson7223 without football, there is no business.
@@filmc3887 no it’s all about the business, look at Utd, if the Utd fans want the Glazers out they should all stop going to the football matches, buying the shirts etc, but they don’t and as long as the money comes in the board don’t care about the fans.
well then those cheap ass owners are gonna be mad when Bournemouth gets relegated again, if you have a football club you have to think of how to make it better, not how u can save money and you can't tell me that they can't buy a single player to make the team better, this just shows that owners are thinking just on money and not the club
Lol Forest have changed the landscape this summer.
Our action in this window is forcing managers of other clubs to ask their owner "why aren't we being more heavily backed?"
Simon right, if Scott Parker had a sit down with the Owner and he was straight Parker then he goes and does that, it's a loyalty not footballing decision why he got sacked.
Simon loves to harp on being a former owner
He’s right what he’s said. Look at the money Forrest have spent to stay in the league. They were giving him an impossible job and sack him as soon as he calls the owners out for it
You don’t know the financial situation at Bournemouth and Forest any more than I do. And as a Leeds fan I absolutely want my club to be run responsibly financially - I know what it feels like when my club implodes and tumbles down the leagues, to fester for 16 years, because of financial mismanagement.
Simon Jordan is right here - the board will have told Scott Parker exactly what the financial situation was before this summer. He could see that the team wasn’t good enough and has agitated to get himself sacked so he doesn’t have another relegation on his CV. But you can be sure that other owners will be wary of hiring Scott Parker after this. Publicly going against your own board does not sit well, and he did it at Fulham as well.
Why is Simon so invested and upset ? 😂😂😂 breathe my friend core blimey geez 🤦🏽♂️🤣
Oh look its Trevor before he was sacked.
So Parker walks away, Jordan calls him a bottle job. Parker gets relegated - Jordan calls him a failure.
Jordan was correct both times
Speaking the truth is always going to go against you in this fkd up world.!
And talkSPORT need to sack Trevor Sinclair.
Simon is spot on that’s the rules in any business loyalty between the owners and the management I feel for Scott Parker but he crossed the line !!!! YNWA
Simon is blinkered on this. Owners know full well that owning a football club is a money pit and to expect sympathy for their financial burden is unrealistic and unwarranted. Egos like Simon's are commonplace amongst wealthy owners who take on clubs as per projects and expensive hobbies. Who knows what they promised Parker and he is only saying what the players and fans are thinking. No doubt they will appoint a submissive lap dog as next manager and buckle up for a season of misery on the pitch.
A money pit you say...do you think that's it's a sound business decision then?
He’s delusional mate.
And it just shows how petulant the owning is that he fired a decent manager because he felt a bit disrespected.
“I guarantee you” you have no way of knowing that at all.
Why’s he talking about West Brom lol.
“I battered Norwitch for bad decisions”
Not buying players is a bad decision lol.
@@nicholasbaldwin4897 Absolutely not. Owners typically have done very well in business to be in the position to buy a club in the first place but must go into club ownership understanding that very few clubs are profitable and most need propping up by the owners. True is isn't Parker's money on the line but Simon's sympathy for the owners doesn't really wash.
Was he asking for sympathy? Sounded to me like he was saying the owners don't publicly ask for sympathy and it should be expected professional etiquette for managers to act in the same way. If a manager behaved like this in any other industry they would be marched out the front door in a flash
@@jhpfdijtuiweruot but the manager needs backing to do his job. If they dont back him it's his career that takes the hit.
i think the fact he is incapable of damage control did him there. at half time he should have bring in extra defender and make it a back 6, he didnt and the players left out to dry. then maybe he goes in after the players post game, most managers are sacked when the players arent on the same side anymor
Almost as if he wanted it to happen...
@@jhpfdijtuiweruot he did mate.
@@steve13191 Yes, pal. I know
Haha such an owners perspective.
1) what was the objective? 2) was it smart? 3) was it achievable with resources? If Scott was asked to stay in the league I'd argue he has the squad to do that. If he was asked to do more then he's absolutely right to ask for help.
What I want to know, is how can a team who hasn’t been in the top flight this CENTURY can spend 170 million on transfers, but a team who spent 5 years as Premier League regulars and have just come back up, can only spend 26 million?.
because football clubs are a business with unique financial circumstances independent of their recent history. Perhaps Forest was run better?
for a start, forests capacity is over double bournemouths.
Forrest are gambling with the hope of staying in the premier League, however, relegation could be fatal for the club, whereas, Bournemouth have secured the future of their club If they are relegated or not.
@@Kennycheeseman almost triple. Bournemouth don't own there stadium either, nor have much infrastructure. The first team training complex is a temporary building, the academy doesn't really have any facilities... they spent all their money to stay in the prem last time and had nothing to show for it when they came back down...realistically a league one club and all the fans know that, Scott Parker knew it wasn't a money pit so is saving his reputation by getting himself the sack...but Nu-Metalfan wouldn't know any of that because they are to ignorant to do any research on the history of Bournemouth... clearly the board are taking a different approach this time and plan to build the club instead if spending it all on players.
He’s also admitted he’s not a good enough manager if he needs new players to keep them up. Dyche, Potter, Pulis, Frank and more have all had modest squads on a low budget but have never complained and just coached their teams well enough to pick up points to survive
Different times now
Souness lives in Bournemouth,didn’t know that !
"Any winners in this"? "Sean Dyche"!😂😂
They didn't even put up a fight..there was no pride on show .. that sets alarm bells ringing straight away
As soon as Simon Jordan starts talking you know exactly where he’s going on these topics.
Yeah has to treat everything like its the worst event in history and judge the protagonist as a criminal lmao. Broken record
@@Invin_cibles he's a broken record because he always has to explain very simple things to very stupid people
@@jackcollins6218 he explained how it all goes down between owners and managers and Trevor just blurts out "hes just being honest" 😆🙈
@AVRO yeah I'm stupid I'm sorry
@OH Oh I'm very sorry I'll just shut up
Bournemouth spent £25m tho.
My club Newcastle spent less than that last summer, losing nearly every match etc. We were told to thank Mike Ashely and Steve Bruce was amazing.
Parker just been honest , shame the owners haven’t backed him.
"One should know their place" Simon showed his true colors with that statement alone.
but he is not wrong unless your Matiew Flammini and can come and buy the club just do the job
Well Jordan, as an ex-failed club owner yes I am sure you would want your manager to just resign so you dont have to pay him off and sack him. Lets face it, Bournemouth have not spent enough, not strengthened enough. The players are going to get a hiding each week, I am not surprised Scott has come out and been vocal - he is responsible for the players and staff and the board are not only not backing him but they are not backing the staff and players either. No one has mentioned what the players have probably been saying to Parker about the lack of investment.
Wow I didnt know he used to own a football club so I googled him and discovered that he did and yesterday he has just bought another football club XD
I can see that the board and owner are determined to go down.
And perhaps try to get promoted the year after. Football is not on their minds, but profit, only.
I simply *adore* that talkSPORT has a former owner on to discuss these issues because you NEVER hear their perspective voiced on anything in any other forms of media at all.
Can’t blame Parker for speaking out…can’t blame the board for sacking him for complaining to the media🤷🏻♂️
Simon Jordan talk starts at 4:33
The internet needs more people like you 👏
So Simon why do football manager get sacked so often when the board haven't helped to support them to stay in the league???
This was brilliant.
Really wish people would read the statement from the club before commenting about their fixtures. It has nothing to do with their results, but everything to do with Bournemouth’s owners not wanting to spend money.
They should sell the club then.
@mrshankly213 I disagree. I think the board are being incredibly responsible. Bournemouth are not a big team. When it comes to fan support, infrastructure and revenue they massively smaller than all clubs in the league.
It makes no sense then spending £80 million, risk getting relegated anyway and bankrupting the club like derby.
They shouldn’t gamble the entire future of the club just because one morning Scott Parker woke up and decided he wanted to take on clubs 5 times the size of them
@@adamspimbly4706 So why don't they invest money in club infrastructure? They could have done that in the Howe era, built a bigger stadium etc, but they didn't. Where has all that money gone? Where will they money they get from promotion and relegation go? No players will be bought, no infrastructure will be upgraded. Seems like there's TV/PL money there that's not doing anything. I bet the owners and shareholders have alll upgraded their houses though.
@mrshankly213 okay let’s say they spend 200 million building a massive new stadium...
Oops they have no fans to actually fill the extra seats with. So that would be pointless.
It’s incredibly easy to spend money, but that alone won’t get you anywhere. Bournemouth are an incredibly small club compared to others in the premier league...they can’t compete long term with teams that have the revenue waaay above them.
The owners may have taken some funds sure, but they aren’t wrong for not trying to compete with clubs 5 times the size of them
@@adamspimbly4706 Bournemouth are a lower end championship/ league one side which is massively punching above its weight. That’s not me digging at them, I have huge respect for Bournemouth and what they have achieved.
Simon says and annoys everyone 😂
He has that kind of Dragon's Den smugness about him that can't help but annoy people even when they agree with what he is saying.
So true. If Parker isn't happy, quit. You don't bad mouth your employer. I'd fire someone as soon as humanly possible if they talked about me like that.
The only person worth listening to is Jordan. The host interupts and talks like a child. Sinclair is just not enough
I'm with Jordan on most of this. Most fans do not understand that football clubs are a business. Clubs like Bournemouth are at a disadvantage when competing at this level. Parker should have zipped it. Having said that I as the business owner would have pulled Parker up for these comments, but not sacked him. The point is a club (or any business for that matter) needs cohesion, loyalty and all to be fighting the same corner. Parker needed a chance to prove his mettle.Bournemouth showed their character bouncing back against Forest.
If I’m an owner of a club and the manager is saying we will be relegated before kicking a ball he has to go. Blackpool came up and stayed up 2 seasons without spending much money. Learn to coach and believe In your coaching Parker. However at the same time Bournemouth does need backing
Sitting in the fence much
@@SeanBeatsMapson not really I’ve said Bournemouth squad needs backing but if your mentality is we are relegated before we’ve kicked a ball you should be sacked. Your mentality as a coach feeds down to your squad so no wonder they conceded 9 goals
Lol you think this league is at the same level as the one Blackpool joined?
Parker said something similar with Fulham at the start of the season in a post match interview and you just knew they were going to get relegated. Shocking leadership to announce in public that you don't trust the men in your team
@@jhpfdijtuiweruot exactly
Jim brings up factual statements Simon made against him and he straight up denies it everytime 😂
Simon is bang on ...
Just a breath of fresh air listening to this guy ..
Jordan speaks of loyalty. Who managed them to get promoted, that netted the owners £150 mil?
Conte did the same thing and the board back him after.
Bournmouth sack Scott when he was dead on the money. They need investment if they want to stay up.
The failure of a football club owner would have sacked scott parker why am i not suprised.
He’s been honest to the point that he was never going to get a windfall of cash to spend and the owner doesn’t want any reminding
Yeah, Parker needed backup. But the matter is that he should’ve discussed his points inside the meeting room, not out in public. You meet the man, present your requirements, and try convincing him. If you win the negotiation, you get what you want; if you don’t, you either do what you can with what you have or leave the club. No point whining about it after being unable to conclude the discussion with the man in charge