How OJ Simpson's Case Would Be Different Today
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 24. 06. 2024
- Josh Mankiewicz is a seasoned journalist and television reporter, known primarily for his work on NBC's "Dateline NBC."
www.m-vac.com/
All Things Crime is a new, comprehensive video series that will explore every aspect of crime and the ensuing investigation, one video interview at a time. The host, Jared Bradley, is the President of M-Vac Systems, which is a wet-vacuum based forensic DNA collection system, and has experience traveling the world training all levels of law enforcement and crime lab DNA analysts in using the M-Vac to help solve crime. Along the way he has met people from all walks of life and experience in investigating crimes, so is putting that knowledge to use in another way by sharing it in these videos.
If you are interested in more videos about the M-Vac, DNA and investigations, also check out the M-Vac's channel / @mvacsystemsdnacollection
đ đ THIS VIDEO IS PROTECTED UNDER COPYRIGHT LAWS, AND VIOLATORS WILL BE PROSECUTED! DO NOT REMOVE TIR WATERMARKS, AND PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU CREDIT AND LINK THE SOURCE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR UNDERSTANDING!
#coldcase #AllThingsCrime #dna #joshmankiewicz #dateline #datelinetv #journalist #truecrimepodcast #truecrimestories - VÄda a technologie
That jury never would have found him guilty even if he admitted it
What about Emmitt Til murders
The lead detective perjured himself then took the 5th when asked if he planted evidence. Thatâs what did it. No evidence can be taken seriously after that.
100% agree!
@@TheDreadPirateRoberts-jr2fk the prosecutor was inept as well.
@@AllThingsCrime Thatâs true. But I donât think the best prosecutor in the World could have come back from Markâs testimony. The trial was over when he invoked the 5th. It casts a reasonable doubt on the entire police report and every piece of evidence they gathered. As a juror, itâs your duty to not convict in such a case.
OJ would be toast in todays forensic environment!
Criminals beware!
That jury wouldâve never found him guilty no matter the evidence, even if they had him on video holding the head
Sad but likely true!
Today, the four cops that beat Rodney King would be convicted instantly
I doubt they'd get off scott free that's for sure!
Go watch some interviews or the book from the jury forewoman, she was asked how many would you say voted not guilty for payback from 1992? She said 7-8đand thatâs with his blood his wifeâs blood and Ronâs blood being found in the bronco and his bleeding left hand leaving a trail from bundy to his house
After the Rodney King incident there's no way they would have convicted him
Forgot the word allegedly,,,,,,!!!!!!!!! Mr.Q Southside Jamaica Queens
đđ
Assuming he actually did the crime. I think that this is still America. Or that rhetoric about the presumption of innocence is just a bunch of bull$&!+?!?
It's pretty obvious once you look into the evidence and his history of beating her to a pulp numerous times, threatening to kill her if she left him ect ect
There was a TON of evidence, both circumstantially and physical that pointed in one direction.
@@RegurgiNate84 That definitely contributed to the motive!