So confused why they let these morons drive away with no insurance, no registration and no license. His truck and trailer should have been towed and stayed in impound till it was registered, insured and someone with a valid license picks it up.
Absolutely. This young man is going to pay his speeding ticket, that's it. He can't get points because he has no license ro "put them" on ! He will put his "Cardboardsky" plates (home made)back on. He will go back to towing his uninsured trailer with his uninsured truck. Your family might be on the road with this menace !!!
In Florida, it's at the officers discretion whether they tow or not, but I know in Kansas, for example, they can't tow your vehicle unless it's blocking or is a danger to traffic.
my best friend was once pulled over in montpelier, vt after midnight for having one headlight out. the cop told her she couldn't drive away because it was "illegal to operate a motor vehicle that doesn't adhere the rules of the motorway." she asked how she was going to get home. he told her to call someone. she said she didn't have anyone, her family was in arizona and she lived alone. he said, "figure it out or i'm writing you a citation." he returned to his speed trap a block away. she had to spend the night in her car in january in vermont. and this guy just heads off on his merry way, kvetching about his ~right to travel~.
When the defendant states 'this happens every time', that's about all I need to hear. This is about speeding, and should include reckless driving, not about right to travel.
That would require more brain power and report writing, can't be bothered! This happens so much that they can't tow everybody but that only happened when the courts started giving all kinds of discretion to police and prosecutors.
Whoa, there. By your own Sovcit rules, if you're a professional driver, you are driving in commerce and you have to adhere to all the laws of the road everyone else does.
They get so used to their formulas that they don't even notice what they actually mean. I've had one explain that he's "traveling privately, and not in commerce" when he also said in the same breath that he was delivering pizzas.
It is perplexing why these ignorant children keep trying this crap when it has never worked in court even one time. They are just not capable of learning.
@@davidjones-vx9ju I don't think it has. There are cases dismissed but they did not win. I asked two separate lawyers and both of them said that it has never worked. Of course I don't know that for a fact.
They don't learn when you have a judge giving this jackoff a pass with just a fine. Where's the proof of insurance? If he whacks a family out of existence driving the way he is currently the blood is on the judges hands.
He does not have the right to travel in a vehicle on the road, unless he follows rules, such as having a driver's license, insurance, following speed limits, etc. He is only granted the right to travel without the restrictions I mentioned if he is on FOOT.
He is traveling, not driving; furthermore, he is a natural man, not the person with capital letters, needs no insurance or registration as he is not for hire LOL =) sarcasm alert!
"I am a professional driver" and "I have a right to travel" do not go together, ask the SovCits. If you're driving for commerce (i.e. 'professional driver') you have to have a license. You only get to 'travel' if you aren't conducting commerce... Meanwhile, everyone else knows they have to have a license to drive, period.
See in the UK if he'd been stopped with no insurance he'd be walking (oops sorry travelling) home on foot....his car would have been seized and impounded on the spot, and he would get it back until he turned up with all the correct documents and proof of insurance...fail to do that in 14 days and bye bye motor car, it gets crushed
@@jmsmom67 Bring in laws that punish the police for letting him drive away when he hurts/kills someone and they will start towing real fast Any sov cit that causes injury after being caught, and given the chacne to drive again, is 50% the fault of the police
More accurately I believe, UK enforcers then have options, which include selling or scrapping or crushing. The main thing is, they determine what happens to the vehicle if suitable insurance isn’t presented within x days.
He's sitting there smiling like he's done nothing wrong. Why are these people allowed to keep driving without credentials? Do they need to total someone else's car, injure someone or kill someone before they are stopped? This makes no sense.
He certainly does have the right to travel, without insurance, at any speed he so chooses... on foot. He does NOT have the right to "travel" on any public road, thoroughfare, highway, byway, expressway, interstate, lane, boulevard, street, avenue, etc. without a license, registration, insurance, and if required, a safety and possibly an emissions inspection. He can't do that on a public road. He can do that in the woods, across a field, up a mountain, down a mountain, or while swimming across a lake. He does NOT have the right to "travel" if he is not a citizen of the United States, he does NOT have the right to "travel" at unsafe speeds in public, and Admiralty and Sovereign laws are truly garbage, anyone buying into that should buy the ocean-front land I'm selling in Kansas. And who said he's a "professional" driver? What test did he take? Who certified him? By using the word "professional", with it's root in "profession", or type of skilled work, that is the definition of "Commerce", you muggle!
"He does NOT have the right to "travel" if he is not a citizen of the United States"? Really? There's a lot of foreign tourists that seem to travel quite legally in the US, some of them in control of motor vehicles.
I read that the right to travel, as in by modes of transportation, DO NOT include motor vehicles that by law require a license (cars, trucks, boats, planes etc.). By foot, horseback (including carriage/buggy), or passenger in a vehicle is what I understand what the term “travel” means. Walking does not require a license nor does horse and buggy (to my knowledge).
Truly. I did just that for many years, suspending driver licenses that is. Held driver license hearings in Michigan, first for almost 20 years in central Michigan and then some more in the U.P. I can honestly say I suspended some thousands of licenses, too many to count. Many of these folks were just like this guy, rather ludicrous or irrational. And by the way, I also presided over a couple of hundred fatal traffic crash hearings. Could tell you of some very sad cases.
Racking up the tickets, not exactly a "professional" driver, Driving 28 over the limit, pulling a trailer, weaving through traffic, I hope he is marked in the system so the next time he gets a criminal charge. Deputy Frank would have set him straight.
He says "I go through this every time", so he does that a lot! The fine should be higher every time, eventually leading to Jail! And he should got all the tickets he earned when he is pulled over!
The gentleman who spoke about UK law is correct. If you are caught driving without insurance the car will be towed. No exceptions. If it belongs to someone else they can get it back from the impound place, but will have to pay the fees. Typically around $320 and approximately $30 per day. If its not retrieved within say a fortnight to a month then it is usually crushed. Even if it's a Rolls Royce. And the Police will only take you to the nearest place of safety, say a Motorway service station if you are stopped on the Motorway. No further. If you have no money for a taxi, then it's Shank's Pony. ( walking). It's a good deterrent. It seems US lawmakers don't take safety and this issue seriously.
This is the same thing I go through every time.... Yo! Numbnutz! Don't speed and act t he fool and you won't get pulled over. What an ID Ten tango! Also, for those true, professional drivers out there: Would this infraction have resulted in revocation of you commercial drivers license?
Ninety-eight mph with a trailer would qualify as 'Dangerous Driving' here in the UK and he'd be looking at a one year license suspension and/or imprisonment and/or a hefty fine. Anyone who thinks that their 'right to travel' includes the right to put other road users at risk in such a flagrant manner should not have a licence at all and should definitely not be a 'professional driver'.
A professional driver would obey the laws of the land. A professional driver would not be getting multiple driving infractions as stated, or he would not be a professional driver long. The attitude of this boy is particularly disgusting, and his disrespect of putting his hat back on is comtemptable. Obviously, he has been victimized by a poor upbringing.
question. he is about 35 maybe. what experience does he have to say that the US is being ran different. all his 15 years of pretending to be an adult? is he like chili, a law scholar.
"This country isn't ran the way it used to be" Lad, I'm 70 years old, and with the exception of rural parts of Nevada and Montana, it has NEVER been ok to drive at 98 mph. You would have gotten pulled over just as fast in 1954 as you did in 2024. Only difference is, in 1954, no judge or police officer would have listened to your "travelling" nonsense for longer than 2 seconds..
Travel, v.i.: To move about from place to place by unspecified means. Drive, v.i.: To move about from place to place specifically by means of operating a motor vehicle. The right to travel does not entail a right to use any specific means of travel.
Yes but these morons use the irrelevant blacks law dictionary to define driving. They believe that a "driver" is someone operating in commerce. It has to be one of the most unlikely of coincidences that most of these idiots discover they never needed a drivers license after theirs get suspended.
Travelling is a right, in any form, foot, train, bike etc Driving a motor vehicule is a privilege, and that privilege is given if you adhere to the rules, aka licence, assurance, etc (and not fucking speeding a 98Mph with a trailer on your ass)
hauling a trailer at 98 mph ?? all it would take at that speed would be about 10 seconds of wasping and it would’ve been a huuuuge wreck 🙄 thank YOU, ✨Wolfy darling
Maybe not for a lot of younger people such as myself, but from what I've heard from my older family members and coworkers who grew up in the 60s - late 90s, I would make the motion that it isn't run like it used to be, we used to be so much better before we had to coddle the weak because they didn't get the notion of actions have consequences. It's too tolerant for the stupidity that finds its way into the courts in the form of Sovcivs who think they know the law better than a judge,someone who's actually went to law school and passed their bar exam. As well as a police officer who has to keep up to date with new laws being added so they can perform their duties properly.
The disgrace is issuing a citation with no proof of financial responsibility. Especially speeding with additional weight on a ball hitch should be a reckless driving charge as well. In additional this judge didn't address his current insurance status and wasn't even asked to show proof of it. Maybe I missed something but it appears to be a complete judicial failure here. Pay a fine and be on your way isn't good enough.
Travelling is a right, in any form, foot, train, bike etc Driving a motor vehicule is a privilege, and that privilege is given if you adhere to the rules, aka licence, assurance, etc (and not fucking speeding a 98Mph with a trailer on your ass)
Penalty should be truck and trailer towed. Can not get out of impound until license is valid, insurance is paid 6 months in advance, registration is good. If these arent done in 15 days, they sell his vehicle and trailer. His license then is suspended for a year
For many years I presided over driver license hearings for Michigan. This was the kind of people I met virtually every day. Let me just give you one example. A fellow purposely was speeding one day so that he would be assured to be stopped and ticketed. He purposely allowed his plates and insurance to expire. He was conviced the U.S. constitution guaranteed him the right to free use of public highays and he therefore was not required to obey these laws. He was not ticketed for speeding but was on the others. He demanded a court hearing. The judge listened for a while and then gave him the max fine of $100 each plus $1000 court costs and judgment fees which resulted in total costs of $2210. This fellow also had too many points. When he came before me he tried the same nonsense. He told me of the other non-moving violations and costs which I verified by a phone call to the court. His legal "expertise" made his wallet lighter; $2210 plus his driver license. True story.
This judge just basically let this guy off. Speeding, reckless driving, no concern for his fellow citizens, admits this happens every time he gets pulled over. By not making an example of this idiot he's leaving the door open for involuntarily manslaughter on his own behalf (the judge that is). What happens when he hits someone with no insurance tomorrow because of what the judge didn't do today? I guarantee you that if this sovereign were to get hit by someone he'd be screaming bloody murder over the other driver's insurance. But even if another person caused the accident he'd still be liable because he's car isn't supposed to be on the road without insurance.
I realize the pandemic made changes in how we do things but these idiots with crappy phone service attempting to go to court via Zoom is just annoying.
This dude looks like he lives where the banjos play. I think that's all that's going on inside his head - banjos playing instead of actual thoughts and logic. Unfortunately, he's allowed to vote and we all know who he's gonna vote for. :(
Every professional victim who gets caught 'oh, the system is rigged against me even though I'm verifiably guilty and guilty by my own admission, let's move on'
Tell me that you don't understand science and technology, Without telling me that you don't understand science and technology 😏 Hell Doofus, he could've paced you and still given you an accurate ticket.
I respect and like Magistrate Norbeck, and maybe it's because magistrates are the first line before most folks see the District Court judge, but he seems to get dealt cards to the point his best hand is a pair of fours ❤😢
This sovereign citizen bs needs to be squashed. The entire thing is based on they don’t want to pay for anything associated with driving/owning a vehicle.
You have the right to travel to and from the jail for your court hearings. Once all your court is done, and you are behind bars, the jurisdiction argument will cause major laughter, and your right to travel to the jail yard will be monitored. Oh, yes....don't pick up the soap.
Nothing will change. He has done it before and he will do it again. He simply doesn't give a shit. You have to take his toys from him if you want him to obey the law. It simply won't happen otherwise.
If he has no insurance, any injuries that he suffers in a collision are not covered by any other driver, even if the other driver is at fault, except in three very, very limited circumstances. Also, the "No-Fault" limitations on liability do not apply to a driver who is not insured. Not a good situation.
So confused why they let these morons drive away with no insurance, no registration and no license. His truck and trailer should have been towed and stayed in impound till it was registered, insured and someone with a valid license picks it up.
You're absolutely right. And he's clearly done it before. So they are letting him drive without insurance. Ridiculous.
Absolutely. This young man is going to pay his speeding ticket, that's it. He can't get points because he has no license ro "put them" on ! He will put his "Cardboardsky" plates (home made)back on. He will go back to towing his uninsured trailer with his uninsured truck. Your family might be on the road with this menace !!!
In Florida, it's at the officers discretion whether they tow or not, but I know in Kansas, for example, they can't tow your vehicle unless it's blocking or is a danger to traffic.
my best friend was once pulled over in montpelier, vt after midnight for having one headlight out. the cop told her she couldn't drive away because it was "illegal to operate a motor vehicle that doesn't adhere the rules of the motorway."
she asked how she was going to get home. he told her to call someone. she said she didn't have anyone, her family was in arizona and she lived alone. he said, "figure it out or i'm writing you a citation." he returned to his speed trap a block away. she had to spend the night in her car in january in vermont.
and this guy just heads off on his merry way, kvetching about his ~right to travel~.
@@zubetp Call a tow truck. It's not rocket science.
And the cop was absolutely correct, it was _her_ problem, not the cops' problem.
When the defendant states 'this happens every time', that's about all I need to hear. This is about speeding, and should include reckless driving, not about right to travel.
I picked up on that as soon as he said it too...I wish the judge asked how many times he has gotten tickets...
That would require more brain power and report writing, can't be bothered! This happens so much that they can't tow everybody but that only happened when the courts started giving all kinds of discretion to police and prosecutors.
Dude STILL doesn't have insurance based on this video. What's going on with this courtroom?
I work in a county jail. I can't tell you how many times I have heard "every other jail I've been in"
"every time this happens..." methinks it is not the police getting it wrong every time...
Too dense to actually analyze that HE is the common denominator of all his troubles.
Whoa, there. By your own Sovcit rules, if you're a professional driver, you are driving in commerce and you have to adhere to all the laws of the road everyone else does.
They get so used to their formulas that they don't even notice what they actually mean. I've had one explain that he's "traveling privately, and not in commerce" when he also said in the same breath that he was delivering pizzas.
@@norarivkis2513 big brain stuff
None of these clowns possess an IQ over 60. You're not going to find a Clarence Darrow in that crowd.
Sovchit at its finest.
Whoa, Tiger. SovCit rules only apply when it's to the advantage of the SovCit! That's how that works!
When I heard “I’m a professional driver,” all I could think of was Rain Man-“Yeah, I’m an excellent driver. Excellent.”
Except this one isn't "very slow up and down the driveway"
@@clescell6587😂
It is perplexing why these ignorant children keep trying this crap when it has never worked in court even one time. They are just not capable of learning.
i think it did a few times....
@@davidjones-vx9ju I don't think it has. There are cases dismissed but they did not win. I asked two separate lawyers and both of them said that it has never worked. Of course I don't know that for a fact.
In the sovict brain losing a case is still winning because they gave alot of word salad.
They don't learn when you have a judge giving this jackoff a pass with just a fine. Where's the proof of insurance? If he whacks a family out of existence driving the way he is currently the blood is on the judges hands.
Of course, you have the right to travel, sir, but you do NOT have the right to DRIVE like a bat out of hell towing a trailer without insurance.
98MPH with a trailer sounds pretty crazy tbh
@@Raums Things can get very interesting when doing sudden maneuvers while pulling a trailer at only 60 miles per hour.
He does not have the right to travel in a vehicle on the road, unless he follows rules, such as having a driver's license, insurance, following speed limits, etc. He is only granted the right to travel without the restrictions I mentioned if he is on FOOT.
He is traveling, not driving; furthermore, he is a natural man, not the person with capital letters, needs no insurance or registration as he is not for hire LOL =) sarcasm alert!
He doesn't have a RIGHT to travel by driving. That is a privilege.
"I am a professional driver" and "I have a right to travel" do not go together, ask the SovCits. If you're driving for commerce (i.e. 'professional driver') you have to have a license. You only get to 'travel' if you aren't conducting commerce... Meanwhile, everyone else knows they have to have a license to drive, period.
Yeah we all grew up here.
Completely contradicted himself. He even used the word 'driver' when he stated he is a 'professional driver'.
See in the UK if he'd been stopped with no insurance he'd be walking (oops sorry travelling) home on foot....his car would have been seized and impounded on the spot, and he would get it back until he turned up with all the correct documents and proof of insurance...fail to do that in 14 days and bye bye motor car, it gets crushed
Really?!😮
@@jmsmom67oh yes 🇬🇧
That’s nuts! It should be auctioned off and the proceeds somehow distributed to victims of reckless driving.
@@jmsmom67 Bring in laws that punish the police for letting him drive away when he hurts/kills someone and they will start towing real fast
Any sov cit that causes injury after being caught, and given the chacne to drive again, is 50% the fault of the police
More accurately I believe, UK enforcers then have options, which include selling or scrapping or crushing. The main thing is, they determine what happens to the vehicle if suitable insurance isn’t presented within x days.
"my (2014) pickup won't go 98 MPH."
ummm, I'm going to call BS on that one.
He's sitting there smiling like he's done nothing wrong. Why are these people allowed to keep driving without credentials? Do they need to total someone else's car, injure someone or kill someone before they are stopped? This makes no sense.
"This is the same thing that happens every time!"
Well...don't you think that might indicate the problem is you?
Every time? He needs his license revoked
Seems that "professional driver" stepped right out of the movie Idiocracy.
"This country isn't ran the way it used to be"??? Exactly how did it used to be run? This PAB is rock chewin stupid.
This country hasn't "ran that way" since 1789.
when liars lie to a judge they more often than not lose badly, he should also of been brought to book for his no insurance and no licence.
*should also HAVE
As soon as a judge tells you to shut up for interrupting him you're done.
He’s a Professional Driver that gets Pulled Over Constantly because he Can’t Drive Properly? 🤔👌🏾🥴🤪🤣🤣🤣
Boy I can't wait to see this guy say that speeding is a right at his trial after he kills someone on the road. What a punk.
You go through this every time...How many times have you been caught. Idiots like this need to get more citations to help him learn.
Yes and you are found guilty every single time, son. If you didnt want to waste your time, then why the hell would you contest the ticket?😅😅😅
He certainly does have the right to travel, without insurance, at any speed he so chooses... on foot.
He does NOT have the right to "travel" on any public road, thoroughfare, highway, byway, expressway, interstate, lane, boulevard, street, avenue, etc. without a license, registration, insurance, and if required, a safety and possibly an emissions inspection. He can't do that on a public road. He can do that in the woods, across a field, up a mountain, down a mountain, or while swimming across a lake. He does NOT have the right to "travel" if he is not a citizen of the United States, he does NOT have the right to "travel" at unsafe speeds in public, and Admiralty and Sovereign laws are truly garbage, anyone buying into that should buy the ocean-front land I'm selling in Kansas.
And who said he's a "professional" driver? What test did he take? Who certified him? By using the word "professional", with it's root in "profession", or type of skilled work, that is the definition of "Commerce", you muggle!
"He does NOT have the right to "travel" if he is not a citizen of the United States"? Really? There's a lot of foreign tourists that seem to travel quite legally in the US, some of them in control of motor vehicles.
@@olsmokey And all of those TOURISTS came here as legally, so through diplomatic relations, they are extended such courtesies.
I read that the right to travel, as in by modes of transportation, DO NOT include motor vehicles that by law require a license (cars, trucks, boats, planes etc.). By foot, horseback (including carriage/buggy), or passenger in a vehicle is what I understand what the term “travel” means. Walking does not require a license nor does horse and buggy (to my knowledge).
The entitlement is strong in this one lol
Can we finally get this guy off the road and have him do some jail time…please!!!!!!!
His license should be suspended right away! 😮
Truly. I did just that for many years, suspending driver licenses that is. Held driver license hearings in Michigan, first for almost 20 years in central Michigan and then some more in the U.P. I can honestly say I suspended some thousands of licenses, too many to count. Many of these folks were just like this guy, rather ludicrous or irrational.
And by the way, I also presided over a couple of hundred fatal traffic crash hearings. Could tell you of some very sad cases.
Wait..he actually was Traveling in commerce 😂
"Ninety Eight [sic] in a 70 MpH Zone [sic] is still pretty wreckless [sic]." -- "Ninety-eight in a 70 mph zone is reckless."
These people live such miserable lives. They fail at everything and are successful in nothing but being wrong and getting arrested.
That's why this is so frightening.
Everyone needs a hobby.
Racking up the tickets, not exactly a "professional" driver, Driving 28 over the limit, pulling a trailer, weaving through traffic, I hope he is marked in the system so the next time he gets a criminal charge. Deputy Frank would have set him straight.
"I am guilty until proven Innocent"...What a hand practiced self satisfaction indulgent!
Gotta love the persecution complex.
He says "I go through this every time", so he does that a lot! The fine should be higher every time, eventually leading to Jail! And he should got all the tickets he earned when he is pulled over!
The gentleman who spoke about UK law is correct. If you are caught driving without insurance the car will be towed. No exceptions. If it belongs to someone else they can get it back from the impound place, but will have to pay the fees. Typically around $320 and approximately $30 per day. If its not retrieved within say a fortnight to a month then it is usually crushed. Even if it's a Rolls Royce. And the Police will only take you to the nearest place of safety, say a Motorway service station if you are stopped on the Motorway. No further. If you have no money for a taxi, then it's Shank's Pony. ( walking). It's a good deterrent. It seems US lawmakers don't take safety and this issue seriously.
This is the same thing I go through every time.... Yo! Numbnutz! Don't speed and act t he fool and you won't get pulled over. What an ID Ten tango! Also, for those true, professional drivers out there: Would this infraction have resulted in revocation of you commercial drivers license?
Ninety-eight mph with a trailer would qualify as 'Dangerous Driving' here in the UK and he'd be looking at a one year license suspension and/or imprisonment and/or a hefty fine. Anyone who thinks that their 'right to travel' includes the right to put other road users at risk in such a flagrant manner should not have a licence at all and should definitely not be a 'professional driver'.
No insurance should ALWAYS be criminal. The fact that he got a ticket wasn't enough to change his attitude.
A professional driver would obey the laws of the land. A professional driver would not be getting multiple driving infractions as stated, or he would not be a professional driver long. The attitude of this boy is particularly disgusting, and his disrespect of putting his hat back on is comtemptable. Obviously, he has been victimized by a poor upbringing.
If your not first you’re last
The deputy makes a good witness, very professional, I imagine it takes awhile to get the whole testifying thing down pat
question. he is about 35 maybe. what experience does he have to say that the US is being ran different. all his 15 years of pretending to be an adult? is he like chili, a law scholar.
These guys end up killing someone on the road, end up on the news..."Driver had been cited 16 times in 3 years..." Absurd.
American Law has no Balls!
Driver looks stoned.
Nope … just stupid.
"I'm guilty until proven innocent from my part" - Never better said XDXDXD
"This country isn't ran the way it used to be"
Lad, I'm 70 years old, and with the exception of rural parts of Nevada and Montana, it has NEVER been ok to drive at 98 mph.
You would have gotten pulled over just as fast in 1954 as you did in 2024.
Only difference is, in 1954, no judge or police officer would have listened to your "travelling" nonsense for longer than 2 seconds..
Bummer the defendant is breaking up when speaking
Example of reverse evolution
He’s right, “this country isn’t ran the way it used to be”🙄
“Im a professional driver” 😂😂. Ok
he is a professional driver i see him every sunday on tv driving a stock car hes the one thats towing a trailor
‘Wreckless’ an appropriate typo 😂
Travel, v.i.: To move about from place to place by unspecified means.
Drive, v.i.: To move about from place to place specifically by means of operating a motor vehicle.
The right to travel does not entail a right to use any specific means of travel.
Exactly, driving is a method of travel and if chosen requires adherence to the laws, rules & regulations that apply.
Yes but these morons use the irrelevant blacks law dictionary to define driving. They believe that a "driver" is someone operating in commerce. It has to be one of the most unlikely of coincidences that most of these idiots discover they never needed a drivers license after theirs get suspended.
Travelling is a right, in any form, foot, train, bike etc
Driving a motor vehicule is a privilege, and that privilege is given if you adhere to the rules, aka licence, assurance, etc (and not fucking speeding a 98Mph with a trailer on your ass)
Even simpler.. You sit in what's called a "drivers" seat, ergo to drive.
Appearing before a judge by zoom call is absolutely stupid. U either appear in person or a warrant is issued
He’s in the drivers seat of a car😊
Why do I suspect this "professional driver" doesn't have a CDL?
hauling a trailer at 98 mph ??
all it would take at that speed would be about 10 seconds of wasping and it would’ve been a huuuuge wreck 🙄
thank YOU, ✨Wolfy darling
Yes even though it’s a Chevy a 2014 vehicle of any brand will go 98mph. For how long thanks another story.
This country is doomed…
He's a "professional" all right - but I'm thinking of something other than "driver".
EXACTLY 😅😅 !! An IDIOT !!
Country ain't run the way it used to be. What are you like 22? You haven't been around long enough to make that decision junior!
Maybe not for a lot of younger people such as myself, but from what I've heard from my older family members and coworkers who grew up in the 60s - late 90s, I would make the motion that it isn't run like it used to be, we used to be so much better before we had to coddle the weak because they didn't get the notion of actions have consequences.
It's too tolerant for the stupidity that finds its way into the courts in the form of Sovcivs who think they know the law better than a judge,someone who's actually went to law school and passed their bar exam. As well as a police officer who has to keep up to date with new laws being added so they can perform their duties properly.
poor judge norbeck gets the worst
His nonsense at the end should be contempt
Radar has you at 98. Guilty! Next!
Would love to hear the argument that distinguishes "driving" from "traveling". I think law enforcement lets these people get away with far too much.
The disgrace is issuing a citation with no proof of financial responsibility. Especially speeding with additional weight on a ball hitch should be a reckless driving charge as well. In additional this judge didn't address his current insurance status and wasn't even asked to show proof of it. Maybe I missed something but it appears to be a complete judicial failure here. Pay a fine and be on your way isn't good enough.
Travelling is a right, in any form, foot, train, bike etc
Driving a motor vehicule is a privilege, and that privilege is given if you adhere to the rules, aka licence, assurance, etc (and not fucking speeding a 98Mph with a trailer on your ass)
“Reckless,” not “wreck less”
Damn I hate zoom calls. We need to go back to in court hearings.
Everyone has the right to travel , you don’t have the right to speed and you are required to have a drivers License plates & insurance too!
Penalty should be truck and trailer towed. Can not get out of impound until license is valid, insurance is paid 6 months in advance, registration is good. If these arent done in 15 days, they sell his vehicle and trailer. His license then is suspended for a year
Deputy Earl is cute AF!
He looks like a little boy
For many years I presided over driver license hearings for Michigan. This was the kind of people I met virtually every day. Let me just give you one example.
A fellow purposely was speeding one day so that he would be assured to be stopped and ticketed. He purposely allowed his plates and insurance to expire. He was conviced the U.S. constitution guaranteed him the right to free use of public highays and he therefore was not required to obey these laws. He was not ticketed for speeding but was on the others. He demanded a court hearing. The judge listened for a while and then gave him the max fine of $100 each plus $1000 court costs and judgment fees which resulted in total costs of $2210.
This fellow also had too many points. When he came before me he tried the same nonsense. He told me of the other non-moving violations and costs which I verified by a phone call to the court. His legal "expertise" made his wallet lighter; $2210 plus his driver license.
True story.
This judge just basically let this guy off. Speeding, reckless driving, no concern for his fellow citizens, admits this happens every time he gets pulled over.
By not making an example of this idiot he's leaving the door open for involuntarily manslaughter on his own behalf (the judge that is). What happens when he hits someone with no insurance tomorrow because of what the judge didn't do today?
I guarantee you that if this sovereign were to get hit by someone he'd be screaming bloody murder over the other driver's insurance. But even if another person caused the accident he'd still be liable because he's car isn't supposed to be on the road without insurance.
I realize the pandemic made changes in how we do things but these idiots with crappy phone service attempting to go to court via Zoom is just annoying.
Boy has himself a long, long road ahead!
How can he travel that high rate with a trailer attached?? Holy crap, that was dangerous. Don't try that sov cit crap, it never works..
I wish they would get that driving is privilege not a right, tired of hearing, I have a "right" to travel ! Put them in jail
Thanks kid for wasting the courts and officers time.
This dude looks like he lives where the banjos play. I think that's all that's going on inside his head - banjos playing instead of actual thoughts and logic. Unfortunately, he's allowed to vote and we all know who he's gonna vote for. :(
A real genius right there.
He calls himself a professional driver..😅😅
There's no "w" in reckless lonewolf. LOL!
At some point this genius will learn how to pay attention instead of paying traffic fines.
The usual sovcit doesn't have a drivers license or insurance.
Every professional victim who gets caught 'oh, the system is rigged against me even though I'm verifiably guilty and guilty by my own admission, let's move on'
He's a professional liar and needs jail time.
98 Mph.. was he trying to get Back To The Future 😂
The mullet says it all.
Tell me that you don't understand science and technology, Without telling me that you don't understand science and technology 😏
Hell Doofus, he could've paced you and still given you an accurate ticket.
I respect and like Magistrate Norbeck, and maybe it's because magistrates are the first line before most folks see the District Court judge, but he seems to get dealt cards to the point his best hand is a pair of fours ❤😢
This sovereign citizen bs needs to be squashed. The entire thing is based on they don’t want to pay for anything associated with driving/owning a vehicle.
You have the right to travel to and from the jail for your court hearings. Once all your court is done, and you are behind bars, the jurisdiction argument will cause major laughter, and your right to travel to the jail yard will be monitored. Oh, yes....don't pick up the soap.
I reckon that trailer was slowing him down by at least 10 mph.
See. Anger is fear, frustration.
Thanks Lone Wolf!!
Nothing will change.
He has done it before and he will do it again.
He simply doesn't give a shit.
You have to take his toys from him if you want him to obey the law. It simply won't happen otherwise.
Whenever I hear "I have a right to travel" I imagine a 4 year old stomping their feet and yelling It's Not Fair!
They do this every time, he says.... One would think he would get a clue that his stupid arguments don't fucking work after 2 or 3 times.
So no license, no registration and no license but coming to zoom court in his car is ok? Make it make sense!
Tobias Fünke presiding. Were just missing a blue hand print for the court seal.
If he has no insurance, any injuries that he suffers in a collision are not covered by any other driver, even if the other driver is at fault, except in three very, very limited circumstances. Also, the "No-Fault" limitations on liability do not apply to a driver who is not insured. Not a good situation.
I-196 could get bumped up to 75, but 98 is way too fast.
With that hair, put the hat back on.