Idealism Part 2: Fichte, Schiller, Hegel, and Schelling
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 12. 2023
- We introduced the movement of idealism and discussed its most important early proponents, such as George Berkeley and Immanuel Kant. Now let's examine the key figures that were to follow, including Johann Fichte, Friedrich Schiller, Georg Hegel, and Friedrich Schelling. Where did they take these ideas? Let's find out!
Script by Luca Igansi
Watch the whole Philosophy/Logic playlist: bit.ly/ProfDavePhilo
Psychology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDavePsych
Mathematics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveMath
General Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveGenChem
Organic Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveOrgChem
Biochemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBiochem
Biology/Genetics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBio
Anatomy & Physiology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveAnatPhys
Biopsychology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBiopsych
Pharmacology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDavePharma
History of Drugs Videos: bit.ly/ProfDaveHistoryDrugs
Geology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveGeo
EMAIL► ProfessorDaveExplains@gmail.com
PATREON► / professordaveexplains
Check out "Is This Wi-Fi Organic?", my book on disarming pseudoscience!
Amazon: amzn.to/2HtNpVH
Bookshop: bit.ly/39cKADM
Barnes and Noble: bit.ly/3pUjmrn
Book Depository: bit.ly/3aOVDlT
as a German, your pronunciation of Fichte is spot on! Thanks for taking the effort to learn the German pronunciation 😊
German, is a difficult language
Agreed, very good pronunciation ! Sehr gut
I'm not german, but I am learning it and it always really annoys me when people say f(ish)te
@@waelfadlallah8939the pronunciation isn't that hard though, it's mostly just the grammar.
@@MiloMay that's encouraging, if i ever thought of learning German
Nice! One way to extend this mini-series would be to discuss the Young Hegelians, their eventual inversion of Hegel’s idealism into materialism, and their influence on Marx.
Appreciate the way professor Dave can explain complexed philosophical ideas in lay mans terms in a way most of us can understand, well done Dave!
@@michaelcook6483 Don`t know what your talking about what Jesse Peterson (do you mean Jordan Peterson?) video?
@michaelcookk6483 Why did you disable your comment as soon as I responded?
And why you’re trusting that he’s teaching you right? study them by yourself, these videos make things like that superficial, especially when it’s done from someone who’s talking about anything regarding education, better to study it from persons who are specialized in philosophy.
Hey Wael,sending positive vibes to your section of the big ball
Thank you for remembering me man
If I remember well both Hegel's and Marx dialectics did not describe three moments: thesis, antithesis, synthesis but one moment: thesis-antithesis since every thesis contains it's opposition their dialectic resolution, its synthesis ( new thesis ) contains its antithesis.
I came to say something similar. It's a common mistake, but Hegel wasn't the clearest writer. Hegel's explanation of the dialectic was based on the abstract, the negative, and the concrete. As you mentioned, the abstract and negative are in constant movement due to their inherent contradictions, and their resolution leads to the concrete. The concrete keeps some elements from the previous stages while discarding others, thus becoming a "higher" version of itself and introducing new contradictions.
thanks dave
Thanks!
Had no idea Schiller was in the mix like that, always thought he was just the poet who wrote An Die Freude back in the 1790s.
Im just here for the german name pronounciations
Hey, professor Dave have you done any videos on the evolution of the immune system if not, could you please make one, thanks
My immunology series makes some comments about the evolutionary context of certain features.
@@ProfessorDaveExplainsis it a comprehensive explanation? I’ll check it out anyway thanks Dave🙏
Thanks Dave, appreciate the philosophy videos. You’ve really helped them make sense to me.
Professor Dave is the type of guy to compete against you in a trivia contest about your entire life and win
❤
How you gonna nail the pronunciation of Fichte but keep messing up Berkeley?
Thanks for explanation Science Jesus
Berkeley isn't pronounced like U.C. Berkeley. It's pronounced "BAR-klee" or "barkley".
Wait what, Germans.
Next thing the visigoths from the west, unlike Eastern goths.
Asterix and the herculean tasks
If heat inherently has physical meaning when in transit, constituting its existential definition as a form of energy in motion, what does it truly mean to say that heat 'flows'? When we assert that heat is a form of energy in transit, it implies movement; however, using the term 'flow' seems to redundantly invoke the concept of movement. How can the movement of energy itself be described as 'flow' without introducing redundancy?" I created this analogy to understand what the definition is trying to say:"When we say 'heat always flows from higher to lower temperature until thermal equilibrium is reached,' it conjures an image in my mind of an invisible 'glitter glow' dispersed in the atmosphere(massless being in motion). This 'glitter glow' represents the thermal energy, and with a temperature change, it becomes unevenly distributed. In this mental model, a chunk of the glitter glow with a relatively higher distribution moves towards a lower distribution in a flow, seeking to maintain symmetry as per the Thumb Rule of the universe. The glitter glow represents thermal energy, and when it flows, we call it heat?
Prof is teaching social sciences now.....seems like he completed maths
🕋🕋
250th veiw huh