Gus UNLOADS on Gal over NRL rules | NRL on Nine
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 14. 06. 2020
- Phil Gould unleashes on Paul Gallen over NRL rules! Subscribe đ bit.ly/2lvAJT2 NRL Newsđ bit.ly/2mPWIV9
NRL on Nine is the home of rugby league in 2020 so stayed tuned for more NRL highlights, analysis, opinion and video.
Watch NRL LIVE and FREE: ow.ly/Lp2F50xjju3
Like us on Facebook: / nrlonnine
#NRLonNine #WideWorldofSports #NRL - Sport
Reasons why Brace is the perfect host:
1. He consistently keeps the show flowing smoothly. If a topic is heating up, he will generally let that topic continue a bit longer than normal because that's what the viewers want. Even though the producers are responsible for this, he makes it seemless.
2. He realizes that the show is NOT about him. He doesn't interject with nonsensical statements as though he just likes to hear his own voice. He defers to the professionals for the technical analysis of the game. Is there anything more annoying than a talk show host who makes the show about themselves?
3. He's professional....but not too professional. Brace is not scared to laugh at himself, he keeps a jovial tone and positive attitude throughout. He looks like he's actually enjoying himself and doesn't come across as being too serious, while keeping a professional demeanor.
4. He's a genuine Rugby League fan. I listen to his podcast with Gus every week, and when Gus brings up a subject which most would find ominous, Brace generally has a good idea about what Gus is talking about. If Brace doesn't know what Gus is talking about, he will ask about it curiously as though he genuinely wants to learn.
5. Brace just comes across as a very likeable guy in my opinion. He looks like he actually enjoys his job and is doing it for the right reasons. He doesn't come across as an elitist. He's just an average guy, doing an above average job. Good on you James.
Thank you for taking the time to read my comment.
I've slowly warmed up to him, you're 100% right on your evaluation.
1000% man, dead on, he does a fantastic Job. Good bloke!
Spot on bra
Well spoken.
Michael Keating same. I remember saying to my brother heâs no good Totally changed my mind during covid. Seems like a top bloke
4:04 GUS: "I'm agreeing with myself, that's all I need"...GOLD!! Pure, 24 carat GOLD
Haha
I agree with Gus. Didn't take defenders long to start realising they could just flop & prevent try's being scored.
It used to be open to interpretation and there was no consistency. At least now the refs are consistent. That's all that matters. Gus just has a bad memory and is 100% wrong
its not consistant untill a try is scored though
Gallen and his mates the pioneers
I agree completely
It is just a matter of players gaming the system...........we see it now with âcrusherâ tackles. How many players grab their neck like they are never going to walk again then magically feel better after the whistle is blown? How many of these âcrusherâ tackled players ever leave the field?
Until players stop trying to game the system then it will happen and stupid rules will be made to cover it.
feels like Gus is arguing with his younger "self lol
I'm totally on Gus side on this argument
Gus 7 mins into his rant.. " I haven't even started yet"
Let gus be the nrl CEO then we won't feel like we are watching soccer hehe
This was just classic. Love him or hate him he never fails to make sense. In all my time of watching footie I have only ever heard two people being called a genius by their peers. One was Jack Gibson and the other was was Phil Gould.
One of the best football brains. As a Queenslander, I was relieved when he stopped coaching origin.
Gus is right on this one
Gus is correct in the argument.
The call should be left to refs...
I love that Greg bird reference so true.
Exactly cherry-Evans we all saw your flop on the Broncos try.
that one had me confused, he committed to that
@Timon Yeah it's a flop %100 but it's so easy bending the NRL rules. Look at Storm with the scrum penalty. They abused it so easily and NRL didn't care lol. The rules have always been inconsistent. Gus raised some very good points. Not to mention the forward pass/ruck control issues.
then manly were given the try when a decoy runner took out a defender. exact same play too
But no one cares because the Broncos are rubbish đ€·ââïž
The immovable object battling with the irresistible force....Gus makes a good point when explaining running at the defenders..
I like that line. I'm going to use it with my boss and see how it goes: "So long as I agree with myself, that's all that matters".
Gus is 100% right on both arguments the rule and Gallen being a cheat! Never thought I would say that.
6:16 âIâd just step himâ đđ
Paul Gallen maybe you should follow the rules ASADA đ€«đ€«đ€Łđ€Ł
gus vs. gal in the ring next
fatlip98 my moneyâs on Gus
Young gus v gal
I love you Gus
I never thought the day would come when I was in complete agreement with Gus!
I agree with Gus. I would love to see the ref making more decisions on the field and it being
Up to the captain to challenge it
I wish i could be loved as much as gus loves himself
prolly why you and only you thumbed up your comment LMAO
@@aximusroh6453 ok
Gus, the legend!
Thought this was gonna be about the peptide scandal hehehe
Gus is right! The 14th defender, perfect analogy.
love gus, agree.
This is GOLD!! Gus is actually right. There is a highly engineered ecosystem in operation in the NRL.
I'm going with Gus.
I love Gus, he's the best
Gus knows.
Gotta agree with Gus tbh he speaks common sense
Gus is 100% correct. DCE with the Broncos is the classic example
Absolutely correct what he's saying..
5:00 Third consecutive gam?
Just shows that the rules have been made so complicated over recent years that we now have a game that refs cant referee.
Knew what you were doing with this title lol thought it was going to be on the peptides scandal.
So sick and tired of having to hear gallen's view on every single thing that ever happens in the nrl. The guy is boring, he's a goose and he ruined boxing.
Yep like the storm player who ran into Klemmer....wow!
The question was does the obstruction rule need to change. Not - was it the right call. So Gallens argument of âbut its the rulesâ is irrelevant.
Gus we love you and you are right.
Gal had no idea here, his comprehension was the issue đ
Guss for NRL CEO!!!đ
Well said Gus!
the games spirit at its core is the defender must stop a try at all costs, the obstruction rule completely negates that spirit and infact encourages defenders to take flops.
Straight facts
OMGđ± I actually agree with Gus!!!
yeh agreed with gus look at the jarome hughes try that was disallowed against newcastle. the player that was so called obstructed had no chance of getting to the ball and the rest of the Newcastle team gave up on the play but it was disallowed because of that one player playing for obstruction.
when i was in my teens and refereeing an obstruction or shepherd was where the ball player ran behing his own player and obstructed the defender , seems a hole lot more simple to me and it doesnt matter where on the field it hapens i saw the roosters do it last year and they made a break for 50 m no penalty awarded change it back to the ball carier it is so much more simple
You and your little mates đ€Ł agree with Gus here đđŸ
Gus is a ex football player and coach he knows the game. And I actually agree with everything he said.
Couldnt agree more with Gus
I agree with Gus on this.
Gus is classic here âŠ..owns Gal then injects the comedy đ€Łâ€ïžđ
Gus for NRL CEO
3:07 says it all
Gus is right!!
That 2nd disallowed try was and is especially ridiculous
I agree. Hunt makes a defensive decision to tackle the lead runner. This does not disadvantage the defence and therefore the try should have been allowed.
Gus is spot on.
Gus has a good point. Players taking advantage of that stupid rule.
gus has a very good point and i also agree that there should not be a rule about the inside shoulder.
Gus knows more then anyone in the game and you all hate to accept it
I agree with guys all the way!
Haha. Gus had me laughing there. How did he get funny all of a sudden? đ
Love it đ€Łđ€Łđ€Ł
I think they should add a rule that as soon as an attacking support player has past the ball carrier he has to attempt to decelerate/turn inside and if he is doing so then it is never an obstruction and then the refs can be even harsher on decoy runners that don't decelerate. Gus is right that the defenders intentionally get obstructed to place doubt on a possible try later in the play, but attacking players also continue their line past when they could have received a pass to disrupt the defence.
Gus is 100% right
In most cases the defensive player is drawn to the decoy runner because if that decoy runner is passed the ball he is through the gap . That's what creates the space on the outside and overlap. Its not a Sheppard if they catch the ball on the outside.players shouldn't milk a penalty if they made the wrong choice
I know they were being serious, but this is oddly a very funny video
GusđđŸ
agree with em'
Both right yes it is a rule and yes itâs not a good one
When you realise you're on centrelink 2:21
Crazy to see Big daddy Brown on the same panel as Gal
Lol this is hilarious đ
Started in the 90s. Knock ons and forward passes that "came out of the hands" or bounced "forward". Best thing to happen to RL is six again. They need to fix the strip rules. Remove the one on one bit.
Gus is awesome, smartest guy in football, i thought he was phil from the transforma ladder infomercial for a minuteđ
Does that make me wrong when I think that if someone without the ball runs a line that directly impacts a defender (as in runs straight into them) that should be a penalty?
Should be up to the ref... period
At around 2.30 Gal makes an argument that Gus canât understand. He doesnât understand what an overlap is and derails the argument because he wants to be right. He doesnât give Gal a chance to comment and Gal never gets a chance to go back to that point.
This is the only time i will agree with Gus
Totally agree with Gus
all warriors fans need to back gus on this, its well known the warriors are playing more than the team they face every week, one reff has gone and when the bunker goes aswell, warriors will be a massive threat
If you think the refs are the only thing that are standing in the way of the Warriors you are mistaken. 1. Nikorima and Green in the halves 2. Forwards are not to good. At least you just got rid of the games worst coach
or, not have decoy runners in front of the ball đ These rules are in place to allow more tries in a defensive game. You want line breaks and busts without offside players continue reducing the interchange rule. The six again change is the best thing, now let's drop the interchange to 6. Make the game about stamina and you will see open, free flowing running football again without offside players. Sure beats the 5 hitups and a hail Mary kick for the corner and hoping your winger can out jump another.
Even bring back the need for the kicker to put players onside before they are allowed to move. You will see a better game open game.
Give it to him Gus!
Wind in my sails
This is a debate about the legitimacy of a rule and Paul's whole argument boils down to "well it's the rule so therefore it's legitimate".
The first one the dragons player cleaned up the sharks player. In the sharks try the dragons player went in for a tackle but no contact. Daly cherry Evans tackled a player and try got disallowed for obstruction
9 months on and Kikau just proved to us how much of a flop fest the obstruction is
He just flopped like someone had shot him makes a miraculous instant recovery and in the same play ran 20m down the other side of the field and makes a try saving tackle
Gus is spot on
Gal got soooooooooooooooo rocked jared shattered
Never thought I would agree with the gus
I feel like sports nowadays besides (basketball and cricket) really make their replay officials do *TOO MUCH* Keep it simple, check for the obvious, make the call, keep the game flowing
I would have disallowed the Dragons try but allowed the Sharks try. In the Sharks try Ben Hunt makes a defensive decision to tackle the lead runner, whilst in the Dragons try the Dragons' lead runner takes out a Sharks' player.
I agree, otherwise it slows down the game.
The rule should be simple if an defending team's player commits to tackle an attacking player with or without the ball then it's an obstruction however if the attacking team player without the ball purposely blocks an defending player from stopping the ball to create an opportunity on the outside than it IS an obstruction.
This is like some marriages. Gus is the nagging wife and poor old Gal is the frustrated husband. đđđđđđ
Gus makes complete sense no need for flopping in this game hence why I donât watch rugby league anymore
Gus' idea of an argument is him talking over everyone so no one else can actually make a counter point.
The point he is making is the same for every single thing that gets sent to the bunker, there are often penalties that wouldn't be charged if it didn't go to the bunker, like a contested high ball and who's hand it goes off first but because a try has a huge effect on the game the lead up comes under extra examination.
Everyone knows the rule and it is the same for all teams, if you are running a dummy line you have to either pull up or ensure you run the line right.
Just have a fist fight đ
he had gal and bird spot on that's why i hated them back then they fn winged every time they get tackled
Up ya go Gus