Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.

Introduction to reaction rates | Kinetics | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 19. 08. 2024
  • The rate of a chemical reaction is defined as the rate of change in concentration of a reactant or product divided by its coefficient from the balanced equation. A negative sign is used with rates of change of reactants and a positive sign with those of products, ensuring that the reaction rate is always a positive quantity. In most cases, concentration is measured in moles per liter and time in seconds, resulting in units of M/s for the reaction rate. View more lessons or practice this subject at www.khanacadem...
    Khan Academy is a nonprofit organization with the mission of providing a free, world-class education for anyone, anywhere. We offer quizzes, questions, instructional videos, and articles on a range of academic subjects, including math, biology, chemistry, physics, history, economics, finance, grammar, preschool learning, and more. We provide teachers with tools and data so they can help their students develop the skills, habits, and mindsets for success in school and beyond. Khan Academy has been translated into dozens of languages, and 15 million people around the globe learn on Khan Academy every month. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, we would love your help!
    Donate or volunteer today! Donate here: www.khanacadem...
    Volunteer here: www.khanacadem...

Komentáře • 86

  • @abderrahmanedamiri7594
    @abderrahmanedamiri7594 Před 6 lety +91

    I don't know why people are hating this teacher. he seems really fine, my professors don't explain anything at all while they're getting paid, this guy explains very well for free !! plus I understood everything. thanks, sir :)

  • @eatyourbuffet1916
    @eatyourbuffet1916 Před 7 lety +41

    First time I watched this I was really confused, but I took a nap and rewatched the whole playlist, and now I feel like I understand every part of the lesson. Recommend you guys to watch the lessons several times if you are confused

  • @dragonfly3411
    @dragonfly3411 Před 4 lety +4

    This actually is a really good explanation! , if you concentrate on what he's saying, it all makes sense!

  • @RedInk102
    @RedInk102 Před 7 lety +71

    so now im more confused.. gunna go see if tyler dewitt has a video on this

    • @prabhattiwari9583
      @prabhattiwari9583 Před 6 lety

      You can visit my channel

    • @kingdbo22
      @kingdbo22 Před 6 lety +8

      ^ this guy has like 1 video...

    • @MiiMaker
      @MiiMaker Před 6 lety +6

      lol for chemistry. I would recommend "The organic chemistry tutor" you can check his video out about reaction rate. he makes me more understand in chemistry.

    • @courtneysmith1589
      @courtneysmith1589 Před 4 lety +4

      Tyler Dewitt is the best teacher on here dont @me

  • @Tellexxe
    @Tellexxe Před 6 lety +5

    Destroyed my chem exam. 10/10 thank you.

  • @sky-zebra
    @sky-zebra Před 8 lety +18

    i like how your voice sounds, easy to listen to.

  • @brianm.4368
    @brianm.4368 Před 3 lety +4

    This is the most underrated educational video of all time

  • @Mohit-ks1gu
    @Mohit-ks1gu Před 6 lety +3

    Thanks a lot finally i got the meaning of those fractions before the rate conc.

  • @Zero-gh9lp
    @Zero-gh9lp Před 8 lety +21

    volume is quite low on this video. Have turned volume right up on my computer and can still only just hear it.

  • @gaurangawatade8516
    @gaurangawatade8516 Před 7 lety +4

    I hated this subject, but after your explanation I began building up interest in Kinetics. Thank you Sir.

  • @andrewjustin256
    @andrewjustin256 Před 4 měsíci

    My take on this is slightly nebulous and I need a confirmation of the following statement; 9×10^(-6), 3.6×10^(-5), And -1.8×10^(-5) are the rate of PRODUCTION of O2, NO2, and N2O5, while 9×10^(-6) is the rate of the REACTION.

  • @arshad8748
    @arshad8748 Před 5 lety +1

    Very useful thanks alot

  • @sciencenerd7639
    @sciencenerd7639 Před 5 měsíci

    thank you!

  • @Ozmucci
    @Ozmucci Před 6 lety +1

    This video was amazing thank you so much

  • @sitimusleha4789
    @sitimusleha4789 Před 4 lety +4

    2:42 just ignore this

  • @zacraman
    @zacraman Před 8 lety +3

    Thank you very much for explaining the concepts so clearly and concisely.
    Unfortunately, I'm not allowed to use a scientific calculator or even an ordinary calculator for my 12th Grade examinations.

  • @meghannslays6101
    @meghannslays6101 Před 7 lety +1

    saving my chem grade +gpa

  • @alicecordeiro_
    @alicecordeiro_ Před rokem

    THANK YOU!

  • @LearnitwithMuhindo
    @LearnitwithMuhindo Před 7 lety

    THANK YOU A LOT!!!!!!!! I'M SO GRATEFUL FOR THIS BRO...

  • @user-tl5sm3ux2e
    @user-tl5sm3ux2e Před 5 lety +1

    Hello. I am conducting a biology experiment that focuses on the decomposition rate of fast food fries vs. homemade. The only problem is.. I don't really know how to measure the rate of decomposition. Any ideas? Anything helps!

  • @daniellionessa2088
    @daniellionessa2088 Před 7 lety +1

    great work bruv, Keep it up

  • @Theewadah
    @Theewadah Před 4 lety +1

    2020

  • @YuhboyJacob
    @YuhboyJacob Před 5 lety

    This didn’t make any sense... but I still learned more Than my teacher

  • @skeche
    @skeche Před 7 lety +2

    i'm a bit confused as how you can just put in a negative sign like that. Is that just your way of getting the correct sign for the final concentration or is it a proper rule? isn't it the same as saying the answer must be the absolute value?

    • @anantjha4001
      @anantjha4001 Před 6 lety +1

      true... If i wanna get answer 0 can i multiply the whole equation by 0

    • @nishatsharmi7852
      @nishatsharmi7852 Před 6 lety

      Neagative sign is used to the rate of decrease of reactant. The rate of decrease is negative. So negative sign before it make the result positive

  • @naveensubramanian7747
    @naveensubramanian7747 Před 8 lety

    Very Very Thankyou..

  • @PonzooonTheGreat
    @PonzooonTheGreat Před 7 lety +18

    Wut. This is confusing as hell.

  • @nishatsharmi7852
    @nishatsharmi7852 Před 6 lety

    Awesome video.

  • @alexandria4167
    @alexandria4167 Před 6 lety +2

    Why the hate on Jay? I love him and his pace is just right!

  • @prabhattiwari9583
    @prabhattiwari9583 Před 6 lety

    Good and clear explanation

  • @mirjanavrdoljak899
    @mirjanavrdoljak899 Před 4 lety

    Thank you! I need help: THE DRAWING SHOWS THE PROGRESS OF REACTION 2A-> A2 @t Based on the drawing, conclude at what time the composition of the reaction mixture will correspond to drawing D. I do not understand the procedure of this task, so I ask for help. Thank you

  • @sidneysharp.
    @sidneysharp. Před 6 lety

    THIS HELPS SO MUCH OH MY GOSH

  • @adwaithnarayanan5232
    @adwaithnarayanan5232 Před 3 měsíci

    So if every reactant and product are 1 mol each , the rate of reaction forr all of them will be equal ? How does that work ? Doesn't it need to be like " rate of formation of proupduct is equal to sum of rate of formation of reactants "??

  • @tabithatcheau1571
    @tabithatcheau1571 Před 7 lety

    As long as the molecule is on the reactant side, I should add an additional negative sign to the rate to make it positive?

    • @audrinasalsabila9785
      @audrinasalsabila9785 Před 3 lety

      As I understand it from this video, if the molecule is reduced (in this video; it breaks down), then the sign will be negative
      . But maybe in the concept of "reaction rate", the value must be positive, so we need to add negative sign
      cmiiw

  • @garen5594
    @garen5594 Před 7 lety

    Anyone know when to use this
    average rate of reaction = (-1/a)(deltaA/deltat)
    First order and second order
    ln(k2/k1) = -Ea/R(1/t2-1/t1)

  • @stavshmueli6932
    @stavshmueli6932 Před 5 lety

    At around 7:10 - Why do you need to multiply the rate of formation of Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) by 1/4? If oxygen forms at rate X, then, in this reaction, NO2 forms at rate 4X. I don't understand why would we want to divide 4X by 4 to get to X, the rate of formation of O2, since in reality, NO2 forms 4 times faster than O2?

    • @audrinasalsabila9785
      @audrinasalsabila9785 Před 3 lety

      I confused in that part too.. why not 4 times instead of quarter times, and why not 2 times instead of half times

    • @audrinasalsabila9785
      @audrinasalsabila9785 Před 3 lety

      Oh, the quarter and half is maybe to show the part of nitrogen dioxide and oxygen in the dinitrogen pentoxide, since it is a decomposition reaction

  • @alyannahmacala3474
    @alyannahmacala3474 Před 5 lety

    What if Nitrogen Dioxide's rate was given instead of Oxygen's?

    • @lawngrease849
      @lawngrease849 Před 2 lety

      that's what i'm wondering. why does our rate of reaction have to be equal to the rate that oxygen is formed? can't our rate of reaction be equal to the rate at which dinitrogen pentoxide disappears? Wonder if you are still looking for an answer 2 years later

  • @73200grandison
    @73200grandison Před 7 lety

    wow you saved my ass so many times.... no homo... LOVE THIS DUDE!!!! lol

  • @TheTriangle444
    @TheTriangle444 Před 6 lety +2

    8:10 was confusing af
    I thought disappearance meant negative values but he was saying it has to be positive cause its only a rate?

    • @mahisolomon8819
      @mahisolomon8819 Před 6 lety

      Since the reactant concentration (A in this instance) decreases as B increases the quantity of A will be negative

    • @TheTriangle444
      @TheTriangle444 Před 6 lety

      Yeah that was the point... but what should I really write in a test paper? nvm it barely appeared in my exam anyways :D

  • @ricobbz626
    @ricobbz626 Před 6 lety

    I wonder why you didnt use stoichiometry...

  • @sunil44dudi
    @sunil44dudi Před 6 lety

    why we are losing dinitrogen pentoxide?

  • @youneskasdi
    @youneskasdi Před 7 lety +2

    Where is the other one, i mean the usual one we fine in Khan Academy lessons this guy is boring af

  • @TheLearner5790
    @TheLearner5790 Před 5 lety

    👍👍

  • @revisionpanda6826
    @revisionpanda6826 Před 8 lety

    dont use M use moldm^-3

    • @MaesterPeemore
      @MaesterPeemore Před 8 lety +3

      +revision panda M = mol/L or what you said, so he is still correct. It's awkward to write (mol/L)/s for the rate. It's better to stick with M, since it's known to everyone.

  • @nooreldeen6397
    @nooreldeen6397 Před 6 lety

    Why don't you sing a song

  • @Beetman15
    @Beetman15 Před 8 lety +2

    you r so fast

  • @OGtrushalpatel
    @OGtrushalpatel Před 6 lety

    Everyone in the comments is talking about how they miss sal. To be honest I couldn't be happier. Sal is shit and cant explain things if his life depended on it

  • @muhammadfaizan425
    @muhammadfaizan425 Před 5 lety

    😂🧐

  • @abderrahmanedamiri7594

    the unit of concentration is m/l not m

  • @sarahhernandez474
    @sarahhernandez474 Před 6 lety

    Wtf

  • @pitat886
    @pitat886 Před 7 lety

    Soooooo boreddddd

  • @chris-id6vk
    @chris-id6vk Před 7 lety

    poor