The odds of humans existing means God | Austin - IL | Talk Heathen 03.32

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 12. 08. 2019
  • Talk Heathen 03.32 for August 11, 2019 with Jamie Boone & David Warnock.
    Call the show on Sundays 1:00-2:30pm CDT: 1-512-686-0279
    Don't like commercials? Become a patron & get ad-free episodes & more: / talkheathentome
    The podcast may be found at:
    www.spreaker.com/show/talkhea...
    Sign up for the ACA monthly newsletter: aca.activehosted.com/f/1?fbcl...
    -------
    WHAT IS TALK HEATHEN?
    Talk Heathen is a weekly call-in television show in Austin, Texas geared toward long-form and on-going dialogue with theists & atheists about religion, theism, & secularism. Talk Heathen is produced by the Atheist Community of Austin.
    Talk Heathen is filmed in front of a live studio audience every week at the Freethought Library of the Atheist Community of Austin.
    The Atheist Community of Austin is organized as a nonprofit educational corporation to develop & support the atheist community, to provide opportunities for socializing & friendship, to promote secular viewpoints, to encourage positive atheist culture, to defend the first amendment principle of government-religion separation, to oppose discrimination against atheists & to work with other organizations in pursuit of common goals.
    We define atheism as the lack of belief in gods. This definition also encompasses what most people call agnosticism.
    CONTACTS & SOCIAL MEDIA
    Instagram:
    Eric Murphy: Erictheheathen
    Jamie Boone: Jamietheheathen
    Twitter:
    Eric Murphy: @dirtyheathen
    Jamie Boone: @reason_evidence
    Facebook.com/talkheathen
    Reddit.com/r/talkheathen
    NOTES
    TalkHeathen is the official channel of Talk Heathen. "Talk Heathen" is a trademark of the ACA.
    The views and opinions expressed by hosts, guests, or callers are their own and not necessarily representative of the Atheist Community of Austin.
    Copyright © 2017 Atheist Community of Austin. All rights reserved.

Komentáře • 1,2K

  • @SPL0869
    @SPL0869 Před 4 lety +83

    “Did you just wait for your turn to speak?” My new favorite line in a discussion.

    • @vCoralSandsv
      @vCoralSandsv Před 4 lety +2

      Seriously! Great moment too. Austin needed that moment. He just wanted to get his apologetics and stopped listening so many times.

  • @dodgermutt
    @dodgermutt Před 4 lety +20

    This is like being blown away by going to the beach, taking a single grain of sand and then calculating the odds that you would have picked that one grain out of the vast number of grains of sand on the beach.

  • @dorcia
    @dorcia Před 4 lety +172

    I cant comprehend science, therefore God. Sound logic.

    • @dorcia
      @dorcia Před 4 lety +27

      @@richardgay7990 I'm a biochemist, therefore, I read scientific books and scientific papers daily.

    • @loveandsqualor6034
      @loveandsqualor6034 Před 4 lety

      Yo Genius Dorcia?
      Are you talking about Beast System Sourced Science?

    • @howardfairbanks6965
      @howardfairbanks6965 Před 4 lety +18

      @@richardgay7990 I am not sure you are familiar with comments on CZcams - they are not real-time with other members like a chat room so I think your waiting is misplaced, given that it's improbable that the above poster is actively still on this comment chain.

    • @howardfairbanks6965
      @howardfairbanks6965 Před 4 lety +22

      @@richardgay7990 I think you're misunderstanding how youtube comments work, which is why you seem to be interpreting it as ignoring or running away. It's not likely they are actively on this comment chain because this isn't a chat room and the comments don't push to people's phones/computer and don't automatically refresh.

    • @howardfairbanks6965
      @howardfairbanks6965 Před 4 lety +19

      @@richardgay7990 Well, it's cumbersome. I'd recommend reddit or other dedicated places for people to converse. CZcams comment section isn't a very effective medium because the comment section has to be refreshed to see new comments on most devices.

  • @fn2577
    @fn2577 Před 4 lety +40

    Imagine police detectives using the "can't find the body...therefore something with god" argument all the time.

    • @roybarrows9733
      @roybarrows9733 Před rokem +2

      That's a great analogy. I'll try to remember it.

  • @sycofreake1
    @sycofreake1 Před 4 lety +187

    This video should have had a fallacy counter in the bottom corner. Cinema sins style. Then it would have been funny at least instead of painful to listen to.

    • @nicosteffen364
      @nicosteffen364 Před 4 lety +12

      Maybe Team Skeptic makes a video on it, what an idiot *DING*

    • @ammarsiddiqui3586
      @ammarsiddiqui3586 Před 4 lety +5

      yeah i would love that

    • @artomies1972
      @artomies1972 Před 4 lety +6

      So painful, I lost so many brain cells. Keep it Flat ,Space Comma.

    • @lucy9698
      @lucy9698 Před 4 lety +3

      They need to start doing that lol

    • @DJH316007
      @DJH316007 Před 4 lety +2

      I don't know if there would be enough room for the number.

  • @612Tiberius
    @612Tiberius Před 4 lety +66

    This caller has just demonstrated that he doesn't understand evolution, statistics, cosmology, or epistemology.
    To paraphrase Dave Chappelle paraphrasing Charlie Murphy quoting Rick James, "Religious indoctrination is a hell of a drug!".

    • @chrisducharme1729
      @chrisducharme1729 Před 4 lety +1

      612Tiberius wasn’t that quite directly from Rick James?

    • @612Tiberius
      @612Tiberius Před 4 lety

      @@chrisducharme1729,
      The actual quote was, "Cocaine is a hell of a drug!"; on an episode of Chappelle's groundbreaking show on Comedy Central. In the episode, I think it was a clip of James waxing introspectively when he said that, which was referenced by Murphy and then repeated (I think) by Chappelle in full Rick James costume and makeup.
      To be honest, it's been so long since I first saw it, and I've re-remembered it so many times in my mind, I can't separate the impersonation from the original quote by James.
      But it really seemed to fit the caller's "Manchurian Candidate" level of religious brainwashing.

    • @chrisducharme1729
      @chrisducharme1729 Před 4 lety +1

      612Tiberius I appreciate your explanation but I am aware of the origin of the quote. It’s been a number of years since I last watched Chapelle’s Show, but I’m pretty sure it was Rick himself who said “Cocaine is a hell of a drug!”
      It matters not! It was a great reference and I loved it. :)

    • @mjallen1308
      @mjallen1308 Před 4 lety +1

      612Tiberius id rather have the cocaine, at least that has a benefit of making me feel like I can do anything thats tied to something that actually exists, is tangible and doesn’t require me to pray to it.

    • @TheTruthKiwi
      @TheTruthKiwi Před 2 lety

      I know right. I mean, apart from the strong religious delusion he sounds like a fairly reasonable guy. To keep his fantasy alive he has to reject all those things plus nature and natural origins, the definition of evidence, observed facts and science. How a person can be fairly reasonable and still maintain those beliefs is baffling.
      He did sound like a newcomer to atheism so maybe he's come to his senses but I doubt it.

  • @tedgrant2
    @tedgrant2 Před 4 lety +11

    God used to sit on a Mercy Seat in a tabernacle in the desert and regularly chatted with Moses.
    Later he moved to an imaginary place, just above the clouds.
    Since the invention of flying machines, he had to move to avoid discovery.
    He now lives outside of time and space where he can never be found.

  • @RobGravelle
    @RobGravelle Před 4 lety +75

    It's raining outside. What is the chance of rain today? 100%.

    • @musiqal333
      @musiqal333 Před 4 lety +2

      Exactly.

    • @timhyatt9185
      @timhyatt9185 Před 4 lety +5

      the probability of any event AFTER it has occured, is 1:1....

    • @HecticGlenn
      @HecticGlenn Před 4 lety +2

      Yes but if you count the number of days there have ever been and add that to how many days there will be, it's an unbelievably big number... And yet it's raining today! And you think that's just random?

    • @RobGravelle
      @RobGravelle Před 4 lety +2

      @@HecticGlenn I can't be just chance!

    • @stevewest6230
      @stevewest6230 Před 4 lety +3

      But what was the odds that out of the trillions of rain drops that fell, I got hit by those exact raindrops - a miracle = God! 🙃

  • @keithpugh6761
    @keithpugh6761 Před 4 lety +108

    This guy should shuffle a pack of cards. He'd be amazed to discover he'd achieved something with odds of 1 in 8.0658176x10^67.
    By his logic that is governed by God.

    • @austin5640
      @austin5640 Před 4 lety

      Point is there wouldn't be a deck of cards to begin without God

    • @seanbirch9663
      @seanbirch9663 Před 4 lety +14

      @@austin5640 Oh please tell me it's actually you and not a troll account. Please please please XD

    • @austin5640
      @austin5640 Před 4 lety

      @@seanbirch9663 haha!

    • @UngoogleableMan
      @UngoogleableMan Před 4 lety +5

      @@austin5640 are you actually the caller? Id love to discuss your points.

    • @DoctorShocktor
      @DoctorShocktor Před 4 lety +11

      Austin Wow, even the dumbest person can point to man as the designer and creator of cards, with no deity required. Infinite regression in creators is going to give you a huge problem when it comes to the universe.

  • @glenhill9884
    @glenhill9884 Před 4 lety +74

    Austin's post-hoc rationalization can be more easily explained like this:
    He started with the conclusion -- Eric or Dave as they are now -- as if it was a goal. It wasn't.

    • @John_Demarco
      @John_Demarco Před 4 lety +9

      Exactly! The probability that their parents would have children is very high, probably close to 1. If they had come from a different sperm or egg, would the caller say, "I guess I was wrong"?

    • @stupidrules1000
      @stupidrules1000 Před 4 lety +5

      Exactly, it assumes a specific end intent. Anyone having studied for the lsat should see this so clearly....lol

    • @DoctorShocktor
      @DoctorShocktor Před 4 lety +9

      Exactly, the odds of a specific human birth has nothing to do with the odds of any human birth which is what his point was, and neither has anything to do with the existence of a God.

    • @petermirtitsch1235
      @petermirtitsch1235 Před 2 lety +2

      @@John_Demarco I asked my mum a question about that in my early teens. I even worked out that if I hadn't been born as me, a different combination of genes, etc., would simply result in a different person, who would STILL be ME.
      The fact that I am sitting thinking about it means that the PROBABILITY of me is 100% REGARDLESS of the POSSIBILITY.

    • @briannyob7799
      @briannyob7799 Před rokem +1

      Ding ding. We have a winner!

  • @blenderhead151
    @blenderhead151 Před 4 lety +32

    I never yell at my screen. I was yelling at my screen, on this call. That was so painful. I need a drink.

  • @punnet2
    @punnet2 Před 2 lety +4

    Obviously, the best explanation for a missing body is that it came back to life and walked away.

  • @tommystyx
    @tommystyx Před 4 lety +5

    If the odds of humans existing is so astronomical, the odds of Austin being intelligent is astronomicaler.

  • @jrouche7009
    @jrouche7009 Před 4 lety +55

    Poor Austin, he's a great example of religious indoctrination....

    • @nathanelder2718
      @nathanelder2718 Před 4 lety

      Is all religion bad?

    • @nathanelder2718
      @nathanelder2718 Před 4 lety

      @Sticky Steve So, why does silly affect you?

    • @nathanelder2718
      @nathanelder2718 Před 4 lety

      @@CaseyTwist Where does silly not belong?

    • @nathanelder2718
      @nathanelder2718 Před 4 lety

      @@CaseyTwist Thank you for your educational knowledge and insight, sir.

    • @nathanelder2718
      @nathanelder2718 Před 4 lety

      @@CaseyTwist Thank you, sir. You have really stimulated my mind with your amazing intelligence.

  • @scottc1857
    @scottc1857 Před 3 lety +2

    I love the shifting of the burden of proof and the arguments from ignorance coupled with a grievous misunderstanding of statistics and odds.
    It's so precious in it's precocious ignorant arrogance

  • @jmg94j
    @jmg94j Před 4 lety +8

    "The odds of us being here are incredibly slim, therefore these ancient Hebrew fairy tales that I believe in must be true."

  • @JustTheFacts2
    @JustTheFacts2 Před 4 lety +20

    Caller: It almost didn't happen.
    TH: But did it happen?
    Caller: Yeah.
    TH: So....
    Caller: But the numbers are impossibly large!
    TH: Obviously not because it happened. If it's impossible and it happened, then it's not impossible by definition.

    • @antediluvianatheist5262
      @antediluvianatheist5262 Před 10 měsíci

      You're not thinking like a theist.
      'It's impossibly large, but it happened. Therefore god did it. Therefore god exists.'

  • @edisoncarter3841
    @edisoncarter3841 Před 4 lety +16

    "We're talking in numbers that can't be calculated."
    So he puts it in 10 base exponential notation that gives it a calculated value.

    • @vincentflannigan2727
      @vincentflannigan2727 Před 4 lety +3

      He probably meant comprehended

    • @edisoncarter3841
      @edisoncarter3841 Před 4 lety +11

      @@vincentflannigan2727 He definitely demonstrated that he didn't comprehend.

    • @JerryInGeorgia
      @JerryInGeorgia Před 4 lety +2

      @@edisoncarter3841 Oh well at least he demonstrated SOMETHING.

    • @edisoncarter3841
      @edisoncarter3841 Před 4 lety +1

      @@JerryInGeorgia No, he *claimed* something. He made no demonstration of his claim.

    • @JerryInGeorgia
      @JerryInGeorgia Před 4 lety +2

      @@edisoncarter3841 You said he demonstrated that he didn't comprehend. I said "oh well, at least he demonstrated SOMETHING."

  • @DeclanSharkey
    @DeclanSharkey Před 3 lety +7

    This is most classic case of the argument of personal incredulity I've ever seen

  • @Gdwmartin
    @Gdwmartin Před 4 lety +10

    I can't help but hear Paulogia0's "For the Bible tells me so" every time Austin speaks...

  • @BSunE
    @BSunE Před 4 lety +31

    This caller right here has finally swayed me, there must be a god, just so I can say "oh my god, how did you not hang up 20 minutes ago"

  • @diogeneslamp8004
    @diogeneslamp8004 Před 2 lety +3

    Dude saw a CZcams video on statistics between bong hits and was AMAZED.

  • @sumo1203
    @sumo1203 Před 3 lety +5

    Can always count on a misunderstanding of math or science with a healthy dose of incredulity

  • @vCoralSandsv
    @vCoralSandsv Před 4 lety +6

    Tim Minuchin is EVERYTHING. Also I like using the Puddle Analogy when someone uses this bs

    • @shaunte5818
      @shaunte5818 Před 3 lety +2

      I was literally screaming at my phone, "Use the puddle analogy!" Lol!

  • @BudgetFilmmaking
    @BudgetFilmmaking Před 4 lety +23

    There also wouldn't be a body if Jesus never existed.

    • @JamesRichardWiley
      @JamesRichardWiley Před 4 lety +1

      Yeshua existed.
      He just didn't perform miracles on himself and his fellow primates.
      That became part of the story after he was dead and gone.

    • @JoBo0209
      @JoBo0209 Před 4 lety

      Master Exploder It’s up to debate. There is some credible evidence that he may have existed but honestly it doesn’t matter.

  • @allenstephens3439
    @allenstephens3439 Před 4 lety +13

    Eric sounds like a 3am DJ for a smooth radio station.

  • @jeffparent2159
    @jeffparent2159 Před 2 lety +5

    This call would have been ended in 2 mins if they just would have said "Austin is assuming his existence is the goal, where ad someone else could have been born instead of him amd the world would be no different." This is the "someone winning the lottery" vs "you winning the lottery argument."

  • @Fimbulvinter19
    @Fimbulvinter19 Před 4 lety +12

    This call started so well, with the caller taking the time to calmly define terms and preventing strawmanning. Hats off to Austin for doing that...
    And then it just devolved in 'probability therefore God,' and evidence-less assertions. If Jesus really did rise from the dead we need to take him more seriously than anyone else to have ever lived. Sure. First demonstrate that Jesus really did rise from the dead; until you've proven that, there is no point to moving on to any other part of the argument.

    • @JamesRichardWiley
      @JamesRichardWiley Před 4 lety +1

      Austin forgot that Yeshua's father, Yahweh, is all powerful, all compassionate and all just.
      If that were true he would not have morphed into his own son so he could be crucified to save mankind.
      The dumbest story ever told to gullible, frightened humans.

  • @simonkoster
    @simonkoster Před 4 lety +20

    "A sperm with your name on it..."
    Call should have ended right there.

    • @John_Demarco
      @John_Demarco Před 4 lety +4

      Great title for a James Bond themed porno though.

    • @simonkoster
      @simonkoster Před 4 lety +3

      @The Wizard of Whatever: That too, but I was referring to him using that assumption to get to those one-in-a gazillion odds of him being born. Apparently he (as in that specific sperm and egg combination) was pre-ordained. But somehow we atheists are the arrogant ones.

    • @DoctorShocktor
      @DoctorShocktor Před 4 lety +2

      Simon Koster seriously drove me nuts. Conflating/inflating the odds and importance of one human’s birth with any human’s birth. He had no idea why what he thought was important was supposedly important, lol.

    • @TallSilentGuy
      @TallSilentGuy Před 4 lety

      He hasn't even considered the existence of twins or triplets!

  • @marcusnielsen9674
    @marcusnielsen9674 Před 4 lety +9

    Mate - roll a dice 1000 times in sequence. On each roll, note the outcome. Your logical argument now dictates, that no matter what sequence of 1000 rolls you end up with, you will have proven God, as it will be impossibly unlikely to end up with exactly that sequence of rolls. This is as far away from proving anything as it gets.

    • @nathank8613
      @nathank8613 Před 4 lety

      What a about putting your cellphone in your pocket and just by "random chance" sending complete text messages. The point I'm making is all logic and reason does point to intelligent design. You don't get a reality that we have by random chance or an accident. If there were no intelligent design, chaos and disorder would prevail.

    • @nathank8613
      @nathank8613 Před 4 lety

      Sending complete text messages as you set down each time. Surely that could not happen by coincidence repeatedly over and over. The more science advances the more it will prove there is an uncaused cause, prime mover, God if you will!

    • @marcusnielsen9674
      @marcusnielsen9674 Před 4 lety

      You cellphone analogy is entirely different from the analogy used in the video. There is one simple thing you must realise in order to disprove the argument.
      The original argument was along the lines of this:
      “In the set of all possible human beings which could exist today, the fact that exactly this particular subset exists, the people who are alive right now, is extremely unlikely.”
      Now that is true. Just like the point-wise probability of any continuous distribution is zero. However, it doesn’t make it a miracle when you pull a random number from the distribution, even though it could have also potentially been any other number.
      All you must realise is, that no matter which subset of humans had been drawn from the set of all possible human beings, you would have been looking back over the generations and said: “it is so extremely unlikely that the exact subset would be alive today...” and that is what makes your argument entirely invalid.
      In your cellphone analogy you have restricted your probability space, by only allowing for “complete texts”, which is equivalent to making a prediction. It is also equivalent to saying you which to pull a number from a uniform distribution along the entire real axis, between 0 and 10. Suddenly, there is a prediction, which changes every thing.

  • @anothertime1282
    @anothertime1282 Před rokem +1

    Whatever the religion it always adds up to 'I believe because I believe'.

  • @cascorick8253
    @cascorick8253 Před 4 lety +2

    Got one hell of a tap dancer here! Dancing with the Stars here I come!

  • @NerdOutWithMe
    @NerdOutWithMe Před 4 lety +9

    Darth Dawkins taking a kinder approach. Weird. I guess he's changed tactics.

    • @vCoralSandsv
      @vCoralSandsv Před 4 lety +1

      Idk I've spoken with Darth. I tried to have a reasonable conversation and asked him if he thought his approach was leading people away from his religion. Long story short he muted me. Darth HAS to control the conversation. That's why I don't think this could be DD

  • @ismallazeeme7789
    @ismallazeeme7789 Před 3 lety +3

    Thanks to all the theists giving money to Atheism. We appreciate the support. Keep it up with those commercials!

  • @jaguarrising390
    @jaguarrising390 Před 2 lety +1

    Truly enjoyed this one . Love the last comments on time left.

  • @Holywell88
    @Holywell88 Před 4 lety

    I absolutely loved this conversation.

  • @Unsensitive
    @Unsensitive Před 4 lety +18

    The odds of this specific state of people? Sure, nearly 0 odds.
    When I shuffle a deck of cards. A specific order of the deck is quite rare. But I'm still going to have an order regardless, so 100% chance of some deck order to the cards.
    Similarly, this specific order of people, near 0 odds, but some order of people at or near 100% chance.
    Looking at the outcome and stating how amazing it turned out this way is true, but it had to turn out some way, thus not amazing something turned out.

    • @chrisducharme1729
      @chrisducharme1729 Před 4 lety +1

      Sanguine I’ve heard that out of every possible order of cards you could get from shuffling a deck, in all the years playing cards have existed, the number of times a deck of cards have been shuffled with the number of decks that have ever existed... there still hasn’t been every single possible outcome.

    • @petermirtitsch1235
      @petermirtitsch1235 Před 2 lety

      Exactly. The PROBABILITY of your hand is 100%, because it exists. The POSSIBILITY is still one in whatever a pack of cards is.

  • @redwineisfine
    @redwineisfine Před 4 lety +15

    No evidence of a god, but yet it's more plausible that an unproven god created everything.... but its still special pleading... regardless, everything needs a creator except the creator... so what are the chances of a creator creating itself out of what exactly?

    • @oscargordon
      @oscargordon Před 4 lety +3

      What I would like to know is if this creator god is so awesome, is he capable of creating (reproducing?) other entities capable of creating universes? How do me know that the god that created our universe was the top (bottom?) level god? Maybe it is just turtles all the way down.

    • @JamesRichardWiley
      @JamesRichardWiley Před 4 lety +1

      How do I know that a Hebrew god named Yahweh is eternal?
      Simple. I just made it up.

  • @RooBot
    @RooBot Před 4 lety +1

    Thanks for everything you do x

  • @burkeyatm
    @burkeyatm Před 4 lety +1

    Austin’s assumption that things MUST be the way they are now, is 100% of the reason why he can’t see reason.

  • @WalkingDday
    @WalkingDday Před 4 lety +5

    Austin thinks he was in the cosmic plan from the beginning. What amazing odds that he did in fact get born. Wow!

  • @Rob-ys6ot
    @Rob-ys6ot Před 4 lety +5

    Take a thousand pennies. Flip them one at a time. If the penny lands tails up discard it; if heads return it into the pile to be flipped. Keep going until ONE penny is left. This penny, every time you flipped, it has landed heads up!!!! Amazing? Yes, IF you said this would happen to that specific coin at the start of the experiment!!! If not, meh, so what?!?

  • @brianjosephmedia1086
    @brianjosephmedia1086 Před 4 lety +23

    Jesús was totally real guys, the proof that he resurrected is that we can't find his body.
    Boy...

    • @giovanniguidi7499
      @giovanniguidi7499 Před 4 lety +1

      "Historical evidence". Stop raping history like this, fuck's sake

    • @iamthatis3587
      @iamthatis3587 Před 4 lety +3

      No body was ever found for Paul Bunion.....or sir Lancelot.....or socrates.....no one worships them: Stories are lessons in how to treat others and entertainment

    • @DoctorShocktor
      @DoctorShocktor Před 4 lety +1

      Alan Koslowski ? I think your comprehension is off? Giovanni is specifically saying there is no historical evidence of a resurrection. You’re reading him wrong for some reason.

    • @iamthatis3587
      @iamthatis3587 Před 4 lety +1

      (oh oh, ignore what the last person wrote to write a response? Got it!) No! All of you are wrong: There is no historical proof of magic ever existing. I couldn't care less about someone called Jesus if they don't have superpowers.
      I knew plenty of people called jeuss and none of them walk on water. If one of them wrote a book saying they walked on water and we found it decades later, I'd look for evidence he walked on water such as other contemporary accountings of it then derive an understanding from there.
      We have none of that for the supernatural claims of the bible. The only places you can find where Jews and christians ever had superpowers is in the bible.
      "handle snakes" - "cure disease" - etc. No supernatural powers from the bible can be demonstrated to be real
      :D

    • @alankoslowski9473
      @alankoslowski9473 Před 4 lety

      @@DoctorShocktor
      If that's the case I apologize. I thought he was defending the caller's position. My bad. I'll delete the comment then.

  • @ShadowPoet
    @ShadowPoet Před 4 lety +1

    "you've got less time".... OMG 😂🤯. My brain literally exploded - I think I'm a bad person for even cracking a smile even when it was in abject disbelief

    • @Hugin.Muninn
      @Hugin.Muninn Před 4 lety

      That was amazing, i almost shit my self laughing

  • @tonybob2354
    @tonybob2354 Před 4 lety +9

    Jimmy Hoffa's body hasn't been found. Did he rise from the dead? Should I worship him??

    • @princesstamika
      @princesstamika Před 4 lety +1

      Yes.

    • @rembrandt972ify
      @rembrandt972ify Před 4 lety

      Everybody knows that he's buried in the end zone of Giants Stadium.

    • @rembrandt972ify
      @rembrandt972ify Před 4 lety

      @Charles Blair Make up your mind, is he swimming with the fishes or living in a 2006 Toyota Celica?

  • @heathentheheretic4909
    @heathentheheretic4909 Před 4 lety +12

    Why do they keep saying the "Creator" lives outside of space and time.
    As if they know. We don't know what was before space and time so how do they know

    • @stevewebber707
      @stevewebber707 Před 4 lety +4

      I believe they "know" God is outside of space and time because otherwise it's harder to claim God created the universe. It's not an argument from knowledge, it's an assertion that's needed to support the creation story. If God is not outside of space and time, how could God create space and time?
      I wonder how many unsupported assertions are needed to support a typical creation story.

    • @heathentheheretic4909
      @heathentheheretic4909 Před 4 lety +1

      @@stevewebber707 well said. Maybe it's just that my simple brain can't think of anything before space and time, yet alone believe in something I can not prove to exist!
      I'm not even sure there was a before space and time .
      We don't know, maybe the universe resets over and over again. Maybe other dimensions are born with-in other dimensions.
      Who knows

    • @stevewebber707
      @stevewebber707 Před 4 lety +1

      @@heathentheheretic4909 Yep, there is some serious, fairly accepted theoretical physics stuff out there that is mind blowing and counter intuitive.
      For that reason I bear in mind that Christians saying they don't believe the Universe could come from nothing are simply trusting their intuition or common sense, over scientists that they are biased to distrust.
      I'm just getting started reading the Lawrence Krauss book, A Universe from nothing. Hopefully it will help me reform my "common sense" to include more complex knowledge :)
      BTW, Before time is kinda contradictory, so no shame in not believing in it ;P
      I believe the Einstein model actually has multiple extra dimensions within our Universe, but that's not something everyone likes about it and there are efforts to resolve that.
      I have heard that there are serious theories that involve other Universes outside of our space and time continuum, so I don't dismiss the possibility out of hand.
      I do have to wonder why some Christians say God is or was outside of time since the bible says nothing about a beginning to time or a creation of time. (As far as I know.) Perhaps in the justification of their creation story they get some mashup of bible and science. The outside of time and space statement seems to be drawn directly from the big bang theory, so they are at least acknowledging a part of the theory.
      I think the apologist tradition basically starts from their interpretation of the bible as absolute truth and looks for science that doesn't disagree, and then throws out any parts the bible disagrees with.
      You know, basically the opposite of modern scientific method?
      But yeah, much of this science is rather young, and changing and improving at an amazing rate, so perhaps within our lives there will be some realistic theories about things outside of time and space.

    • @JamesRichardWiley
      @JamesRichardWiley Před 4 lety +1

      Leave the mind altering drugs alone and stop reading the Bible.
      And clean up you room. It's a mess.

    • @heathentheheretic4909
      @heathentheheretic4909 Před 4 lety

      @@JamesRichardWiley what are you talking about.
      I'm lost

  • @TallSilentGuy
    @TallSilentGuy Před 4 lety +2

    It's like if I shuffle a deck of cards and deal them out on a table face up and say "Wow - what were the odds that the deck would come out this way?" There's nothing unusual or profound about it since my actions GUARANTEED that some array of cards or other would appear; and all permutations would seem to be equally improbable!

  • @michaelb.9975
    @michaelb.9975 Před 4 lety +3

    Austin bringing up the fact that Christ's body never being discovered is priceless lol WOW

    • @annk.8750
      @annk.8750 Před 2 lety

      I believe that the historical record supports the existence of Genghis Khan, Augustus Caesar, and Adolf Hitler. Where are their bodies? Does this guy think they all resurrected?

  • @philosofish6128
    @philosofish6128 Před 4 lety +3

    Sharp shooter fallacy of unprecedented scale.

  • @karendahlquist2629
    @karendahlquist2629 Před 4 lety +11

    " 'standing the test of time' " - - - is NOT evidence. Sorry, Austin of Illinois.

    • @JamesRichardWiley
      @JamesRichardWiley Před 4 lety +1

      The story of Christmas will last forever.

    • @karendahlquist2629
      @karendahlquist2629 Před 4 lety

      @@JamesRichardWiley Perhaps. every time we make through another day could be considerated Christmas, as long as the Religious do not get thier way. They would rather make it to the Heavenly North Koera

  • @matthewoborne1649
    @matthewoborne1649 Před rokem

    this was actually a really good show

  • @IrinNovy
    @IrinNovy Před 4 lety +2

    They don't understand each other. The man on the phone says that it's a miracle that HE was born with such chances of billions of cells and billions of years. He thinks that for HIM to be born there was supposed to be a plan because the chances are that small. But that is kinds the same as the puddle argument. If it wasn't him, it would be someone else in his place thinking HE was supposed to be born. The thing is you can rationalize it because you were born. It doesn't mean there was plan for you to be born.

  • @jaewaitwhat4412
    @jaewaitwhat4412 Před 4 lety +5

    the test of time...
    people have thought the earth was flat for as long as there have been humans. Flat-earthers vindicated.

  • @nicosteffen364
    @nicosteffen364 Před 4 lety +8

    About odds, i am Taxidriver, at the end of the shift i have a amount of money made, how it is in the end us a matter of chances!
    It depends on, who will need a taxi, what is not known before, some will take a taxi anyway, the time they will is not premade!
    Then it depens on wheni start, where i start and what collegues did up to that point.
    And even then its not written down how the shift will end.
    I can guess how much i will make but thats based on how much i made in the past, i have no chance to say, i will make x euros, but it could be.
    Most times i have luck and sometimes i dont!
    I will make money, i just dont know how much, i dont know where i will be at x hours but i hope.
    Sometimes i had it, that i say i need x to be fine with it and it happened, but i cant count on it, its chance!

    • @loveandsqualor6034
      @loveandsqualor6034 Před 4 lety

      Nico Steffen
      Get a proper job.

    • @jamestor6700
      @jamestor6700 Před 4 lety +2

      @@loveandsqualor6034 thats all you got from that?

    • @loveandsqualor6034
      @loveandsqualor6034 Před 4 lety

      Kyle
      He was talking vomit.

    • @bobjoe3492
      @bobjoe3492 Před 4 lety +1

      @@loveandsqualor6034 You're the one being aggressive and attacking multiple people in the comments.

  • @danielsmith1202
    @danielsmith1202 Před 11 dny

    The earth being flat is a belief that to this day has “stood the test of time” to a huge group of people.

  • @johnnybickle13
    @johnnybickle13 Před 5 dny

    Austin called Austin, Tx. With a background of Austin, Tx. on the screen in big bold letters spelling Austin right in between the hosts. Austin knew exactly what he was doing, set this up perfectly. 😅

  • @heathentheheretic4909
    @heathentheheretic4909 Před 4 lety +8

    How does Austin think all religions start out.
    They all started out small and than later become bigger.

    • @JamesRichardWiley
      @JamesRichardWiley Před 4 lety +2

      It also helps if the Emperor makes your religion the official religion of the Empire.

  • @natsdad300
    @natsdad300 Před 4 lety +3

    To quote Ozzie Osborne there are no unbeatable odds, there are no believable gods

  • @stellis69
    @stellis69 Před 2 lety +1

    I've just invented a game. It's called "Post-Hock-ey". Where you claim your supreme team must have scored and add yourself a point despite zero evidence of a goal being scored.

  • @monstrdog7031
    @monstrdog7031 Před rokem +1

    "it's stood the test of time." So have legends of monsters and ghosts and vampires

  • @edwinicogo5022
    @edwinicogo5022 Před 4 lety +3

    I have a feeling that he walk out thinking that he won the discussion.

  • @dickvarga6908
    @dickvarga6908 Před 4 lety +4

    historical proof of JC is most certainly debatable as this exchange prooves.

    • @DoctorShocktor
      @DoctorShocktor Před 4 lety

      Anything; is debatable. But even if a 3D hologram of the resurrection arises, pieces of proven Jesus DNA, and proven historical records of witnesses to the event, were no closer to evidence of a creator. So now what?

    • @ricardovonkrypton8908
      @ricardovonkrypton8908 Před 3 lety

      JC, a human who lived around year zero?
      Or JC, the magical character from a book of stories?

  • @melf9361
    @melf9361 Před rokem

    Standing the test of time is a great tool if you are measuring popularity.

  • @VogtTD
    @VogtTD Před 3 lety +1

    "The lack of evidence proves its true"! -some genius

  • @IT_217
    @IT_217 Před 4 lety +3

    The chance that the *specific* sperm and *specific* egg that made me met may have been unlikely but the chance of *a* sperm and *an* egg meeting is much more likely, almost inevitable since my parents planned to have a child and kept trying until I happened. A child was always going to be, I was just the lucky combo that did happen.

  • @krisaaron5771
    @krisaaron5771 Před 4 lety +7

    I want to know where my 100th great-grandmother's body is, dammit!! Because I think SHE resurrected and came back as the crazy cat lady of Palestine.
    And I want to know why Austin doesn't believe in unicorns, fairies or the Giant Flying Spaghetti Monster. His Noodliness is a lovely deity -- friendly, happy, AND I know where he's buried! (the dumpster out back of Olive Garden)

  • @cmack17
    @cmack17 Před 4 lety +1

    "Small numbers equal zero" and "I do not know, therefore...god" ~Austin from Illinois

  • @Devious_Dave
    @Devious_Dave Před 2 měsíci +1

    Austin's looking down the wrong end of his telescope.

  • @SongWhisperer
    @SongWhisperer Před 4 lety +5

    The odds argument is a bad argument , religious people shouldn't try and use it .
    Even (if?) the odds did prove that we were created , it still wouldn't prove that the God of Abraham was the "thing" that created us .

  • @liampeace1996
    @liampeace1996 Před 4 lety +4

    I do love when a theist tries to sound clever and fails miserably, the passive aggressiveness is juicy in this one. "I don't know a lot about atheists, I really don't" only corect thing he said.

  • @TumbleweedMK4
    @TumbleweedMK4 Před 4 lety +1

    Caller: but the chances are so unlikely!" >>>repeats that same claim 100000 times

  • @koraggknightwolf8454
    @koraggknightwolf8454 Před 4 lety

    Like the New thumbnail themes... on Axp too!!!

  • @princesstamika
    @princesstamika Před 4 lety +4

    sometimes i feel dumb because cannot understand the point of most of these callers are trying to make. dude, you're already born therefore the chances of you happening are 100%. any ovum, any day your apples to oranges comparison doesn't make sense. "i happened, therefore; god" makes no sense to me and I'm not even smart. I don't understand logic but Austin doesn't make sense.

  • @steve66em1
    @steve66em1 Před 4 lety +4

    This really does sound suspiciously like Darth Dawkins.

    • @alankoslowski9473
      @alankoslowski9473 Před 4 lety +5

      Sorry to disagree but I'm pretty sure it's not DD. As ridiculous as this call was he was actually much nicer than DD.

    • @steve66em1
      @steve66em1 Před 4 lety +2

      @@alankoslowski9473yes, I've heard DD in other episodes. Not a particularly pleasant character. The voices are very similar though. I initially wondered if it was him, but then why put on his nice guy act?
      Either way, it does show how indoctrination has clearly muddled his logical and critical thinking.

    • @alankoslowski9473
      @alankoslowski9473 Před 4 lety

      @@steve66em1
      I agree but at least he's not a dick like DD. Maybe we should start referring to DD as triple D?

    • @Eyrie007
      @Eyrie007 Před 4 lety +1

      "Sir, sir, you're not letting me speak!!"

    • @thaineblumer827
      @thaineblumer827 Před 2 lety

      That is absolutely Darth Dawkins trying a different approach.

  • @petermirtitsch1235
    @petermirtitsch1235 Před 2 lety +1

    Well done, Austin. You've gone down the Douglas Adams road, and proved you don't exist, and anyone else you meet is a figment of your imagination.

  • @dieseljester3466
    @dieseljester3466 Před 4 lety +2

    Atheists: Elvis Resurrected!
    Caller: But where's the evidence?
    Atheists: Kennedy didn't really die!
    Caller: But where's the evidence?
    Atheists: Exactly! So if you don't believe those claims then Jesus never resurrected.
    Caller: Well, wait a minute here...

  • @allim.5941
    @allim.5941 Před 4 lety +8

    Some of these callers are so arrogant. They act like the cohosts owe them time.

    • @KC-py5vq
      @KC-py5vq Před 4 lety +2

      David Anewman lol ok idiot

    • @allim.5941
      @allim.5941 Před 4 lety +5

      David Anewman A greater son of hell? You do get that I’m female, right? They make female Marines too.
      If you think you can prove your point about God, call the show. If not, stop trolling atheist CZcams videos. Isn’t there a Left Behind movie with your name on it?

    • @AC-gb7do
      @AC-gb7do Před 4 lety +3

      David Anewman “I reserve the right to be a critical thinker.” 🤦‍♂️🙄😂 A critical thinker wouldn’t believe a two thousand year old story about a Jewish guy being tortured and killed coming back from the dead three days later to travel to his dad’s super secret extreme clubhouse in the sky, or is it in the clouds..or outside time/space with absolutely NO evidence to support said story other than the aforementioned story.

    • @AC-gb7do
      @AC-gb7do Před 4 lety +2

      David Anewman Why not what? Finish a damn sentence before hitting enter once in a while.

    • @AC-gb7do
      @AC-gb7do Před 4 lety +2

      David Anewman Little evidence? There’s NO evidence to support the claims in the Bible. And yes, a critical thinker would reject a story with the only evidence to support that story was the story itself. Circular reasoning. “A is true because B is true; B is true because A is true."
      Faith may be defined as belief unsupported by evidence. To justify his religious faith, that world-champion question begger, Saint Paul, offers the following rationale:
      “Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.” - Hebrews 11:1
      In other words, the argument boils down to this:
      There are things we cannot see (God, Heaven, whatever).
      There is no evidence these things exist.
      We believe in them anyway.
      Our faith (unsupported belief) is itself the evidence of these “things not seen.”
      Therefore these things exist, because we believe they do.

  • @Rementu
    @Rementu Před 4 lety +5

    BIG NUMBERS DON'T EQUAL TO GOD! It's the same every time. Shooting the arrow and then paining the target, only to say: See what chance did that have??
    Sorry what garbage argument is that? This is even worse than the kalam cosmological argument.

  • @fernandezluis11
    @fernandezluis11 Před 4 lety +1

    Poor Austin, he got murrrrrrdered, love it.

  • @fredodonnell3323
    @fredodonnell3323 Před rokem +1

    Throw a dart and then draw the target afterwards. Wow, how did that dart end up in that exact place!

  • @godsu54n0
    @godsu54n0 Před 4 lety +9

    Is it just me or is it getting harder to tell the Poes from the genuine callers?

  • @jimscobie6646
    @jimscobie6646 Před 4 lety +4

    Was he just going through the book "Apologetics For Dummies"?
    The conversation is done if they assert outside of space and time yet can't even explain it.
    Everything in the bible is predicated on the god character being outside of space and time and able to influence and interact with our universe.
    Then there are a barrage of questions to answer before you can even get to this god creating anything. Kill the tree by cutting the root. Don't bother trying to kill it by slowly plucking the leaves. That's my opinion.

  • @fitzmullin6665
    @fitzmullin6665 Před 2 lety

    If I am here I already exist! There are no odds.

  • @itsok6640
    @itsok6640 Před 2 lety +1

    Argument from Wowed by Big Numbers

  • @boobybutt3530
    @boobybutt3530 Před 4 lety +5

    This caller's voice sounds familiar... could this be Gary Milne, aka Darth Dawkins, aka EF, trying a (somewhat) new approach?

  • @JerryInGeorgia
    @JerryInGeorgia Před 4 lety +9

    It doesn't matter if it makes the explanation of something easier. The only thing, the ONLY thing that matters is whether or not it's true.
    And why do they keep making the same mistakes?
    And why is it always "I don't see how it could be any other way therefore it has to be this way." Why why why why why?
    And what's with this "It takes more faith to blah blah blah" crap? Does somebody not know what the equivocation fallacy is? In addition to the personal incredulity fallacy?
    I'm so disappointed.

    • @JaySantanaofficial
      @JaySantanaofficial Před 4 lety +1

      You’re on youtube.. calm down lol 😂

    • @DoctorShocktor
      @DoctorShocktor Před 4 lety

      Jay Santana useless comment there Jay, noting added to the conversation, thanks.

    • @JerryInGeorgia
      @JerryInGeorgia Před 4 lety

      No, he's right. Anyway I might have been having a cow but I wasn't angry per se. I was just discombobulated and flabbergasted at the b.s. The caller was putting out. And I don't even remember what it was now. I just know it was b.s. because there's so much of it, and based on my reaction. And I'm not being sarcastic. I'm being serious.
      Oh, and I'm the one who threw you the Like, Jay.

  • @proditoresmoriendum86
    @proditoresmoriendum86 Před 4 lety +1

    He seems like such a thinking person this truly shows how religion works it just like blinders on a horse while they race truly sad how this happens to people

  • @Gdwmartin
    @Gdwmartin Před 4 lety +1

    Why didn't anyone else ask him whats the chance of a particular raindrop hitting a specific person during a specific rain shower? The odds of it happening are astronomical but it happens every day that it rains, REPEATEDLY.

  • @aikhis
    @aikhis Před 4 lety +4

    lol the odds of human existing are 100%...... because there is only one universe and humans exists, that's 1/1. There aren't other sets of values to add to the equation to get anything lower than hundred percent.

    • @chrisducharme1729
      @chrisducharme1729 Před 4 lety

      toag I love how he says the chances are one in, say, several billion. Guess how many galaxies their are? A several billion. We know of one galaxy that has a planet with life out of the several billions that are confirmed to exist. Therefore, he refuted his own point.

  • @UngoogleableMan
    @UngoogleableMan Před 4 lety +7

    This guy is just throwing numbers out. If my grandma had met someone other than my grandfather, then someone else would be here instead of me. So what?

  • @klausnielsen926
    @klausnielsen926 Před 4 lety

    22:45 priceless!😂

  • @tedgrant2
    @tedgrant2 Před 4 lety +2

    There are people who believe the earth is flat.
    This idea is much older than any other idea that has ever been dreamed up.
    Therefore, the earth is flat.

    • @JamesRichardWiley
      @JamesRichardWiley Před 4 lety

      The earth is flat at ground level.
      The further and higher you go the rounder it gets.

    • @tedgrant2
      @tedgrant2 Před 4 lety

      @@JamesRichardWiley
      It's not flat in my garden.
      I live on the side of a mountain.
      I wish I could move it, but my faith isn't strong enough.

  • @TheKosmikid
    @TheKosmikid Před 4 lety +4

    The number is so great that... the bible is so old... why do theists have no valid arguments?

    • @oscargordon
      @oscargordon Před 4 lety +1

      Well they HAVE plenty of arguments. It's just that none of them are any good. What they completely lack is any evidence other than asserting "Pretty flowers are the evidence!"

  • @vanillagorilla8438
    @vanillagorilla8438 Před 4 lety +6

    Austin: "Well then you tell me how?" Eric: "I just did, the answer is IDK, I'm not sure anybody does, but it's You who claims to have All the answers, so how about You tell me?" 😕😒🤨🙄
    "God" is not an explanation.
    It is a placeholder for those lacking the courage, or the intellectual honesty to say "I Don't Know."
    Near the core of religious experience is something remarkably resistant to Rational inquiry...
    Can you demonstrate that your god's existence, does he manifest in Any way, shape, form, within Reality, because if so then this should be testable..? If Yes, please demonstrate, if Not, then your god must be Space-less, Timeless, Formless, immaterial, correct? In which case, your god exists in No location, No time, with No form, and has No detectable qualities, does this sound accurate? If so, I/atheists would probably Agree...
    Do Not be fearful of challenging your own beliefs, it can lead to great enlightenment. Think for a moment, if you were born in a different region of the world and your guardians taught you Different beliefs than you hold now, would you still hold the same beliefs as you do today? Most likely Not, so wouldn't that mean your beliefs are largely based on your region, geography in which one is born and raised? Sometimes in the "school of life" it is not only important to continue learning, but to Unlearn that which does not agree with you anymore.
    Truth is available to those who's curiosity exceeds they're desire to prove themselves right, who's passion for Truth is Bigger than their fears, who have the courage to Question whatever they have been taught... Unanswered questions are far less dangerous than unquestioned answers, in turn meaning that I'd rather have unanswered questions than unquestionable answers...
    Try to understand that our beliefs actually Do matter because they inform our actions, and if one holds irrational beliefs, it can and will result in irrational behavior.

  • @thedoctor506
    @thedoctor506 Před 10 dny

    "The odds of the right sperm meeting the right egg to make you specifically is astronomical." And if it was a different sperm and a different egg you would be saying the exact same thing to someone else.

  • @IsBeingHello
    @IsBeingHello Před 22 dny +1

    “I believe Christ rose from the dead because his body was never found”
    So I guess all those cold cases of missing persons are just a bunch of dead people that rose from the dead.

  • @NapalmWeed
    @NapalmWeed Před 4 lety +3

    Caller: Why don't you believe, what I believe? I have evidence! (Proceeds to spout fallacies)
    Hosts: That is not evidence...we don't believe that
    Caller: REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

  • @loveandsqualor6034
    @loveandsqualor6034 Před 4 lety +6

    A ROUND OF APPLAUSE FOR SIR ERIC DUNNING- KRUGER! 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

    • @loveandsqualor6034
      @loveandsqualor6034 Před 4 lety

      ANOTHER ROUND OF APPLAUSE FOR SIR ERIC DUNNING- KRUGER! 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

    • @loveandsqualor6034
      @loveandsqualor6034 Před 4 lety

      John Daedalus You just did to me what you were castigating me for.
      All in the same comment.
      Well done ewww! 👏

    • @loveandsqualor6034
      @loveandsqualor6034 Před 4 lety

      @John Daddledoodlefuss
      Five years ago, you had never heard of Dunning Kruger, so shut your cakehole!

    • @loveandsqualor6034
      @loveandsqualor6034 Před 4 lety

      John Daedalus
      Oh nooooo you didn't!

    • @loveandsqualor6034
      @loveandsqualor6034 Před 4 lety

      John Daedalus
      Dunning Kruger was memed in a bid to divide and distract, and dupe people into having circular conversations like this one.

  • @dmclegg66
    @dmclegg66 Před rokem

    You know the odds that I was born were %100 because I'm here.

  • @chrisducharme1729
    @chrisducharme1729 Před 4 lety +3

    “I believe in Jesus Christ because no one has ever found the body!” No one found the body and the most logical explanation is that he resurrected and rose to heaven - as opposed to him never existing at all? You know, we’ve never found a big foots remains, therefore it must have rose up to heaven.