How to Optimize Your Home Theater Bass with PEQ

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 17. 06. 2024
  • In this video, I demonstrate how to calculate Parametric EQ (PEQ) filters to flatten the bass response in your home theater. We first discuss what PEQ filters are and how to determine the center frequency, bandwidth and Q to make precise calculations for correction.
    Remember this important formula: Q = Fc /(f2-f1) where
    Fc = Center frequency
    f2 (-3dB) of right side of the peak
    f1 (-3dB) of left side of the peak
    We talk about how the various brands of AV receivers and processors provide you settings to make these adjustments. We also discuss the importance of using multiple subwoofers to tighten up the seat to seat frequency consistency to make PEQ more effective for every seat.
    We then do a case study of the bass response in the new #AHSmartHome across the front row of 4 seats to show you how to correct for a bass peak common at all of the seats. One filter will fix this bass bump at every seat location.
    Remember, you should be getting good bass at EVERY seat, not just the Main Listening Position (MLP). Enjoy good home theater with your friends and loved ones, by giving them the same bass you're getting.
    For the full written article on this topic, please visit: bit.ly/3tzYhHl
    Audioholics Recommendations Amazon Shop: www.amazon.com/shop/audioholics
    Audioholics Recommended Cables:
    250ft CL2 12AWG Speaker Cable: amzn.to/2vwS9QH
    50ft 10AWG Speaker Cable: amzn.to/3DeMTT5
    Locking Banana Plugs: amzn.to/2ZQt15x
    9ft 4K HDR HDMI Cables: amzn.to/2WiIXeD
    Audioholics Recommended Subwoofers:
    Monolith M12 V2 12” Subwoofer: bit.ly/3EUxoA9
    SVS SB-1000 Pro: bit.ly/3c0rwsf
    SVS PB-1000 Pro: bit.ly/3aWzdAg
    Audioholics Recommended Electronics:
    Denon AVR-X3700H 9.2CH AV Receiver: amzn.to/31UOD3Q
    Yamaha RX-A2A: amzn.to/3kUYnTS
    Denon AVR-X6700H 11.2CH AV Receiver: amzn.to/38zHjMr
    Audioholics Recommended Speakers:
    Monolith THX-460T Towers: bit.ly/3o4QGvT
    Monolith THX-365C: bit.ly/3o7fbsh
    SVS Prime 5.1 Speaker / Sub System: amzn.to/2GWoFCn
    Polk R700 Tower Speakers: amzn.to/3BF2wC3
    Klipsch RP-8000F Tower Speakers: amzn.to/2Vd8QQn
    Sony SSCS5 Speakers: amzn.to/2ndEn56
    Monoprice Encore B6 Bookshelfs: bit.ly/3mU7E0t
    SVS Prime Elevation Surround: bit.ly/3BV0ayz
    Definitive Technology 8” In-ceiling Atmos speakers: amzn.to/2ZYAILm
    Follow us on:
    Patreon:
    / audioholics
    FACEBOOK
    / audioholics
    TWITTER
    / audioholicslive
    #bass #hometheater #parametricEQ
    0:00 Introduction
    1:02 What is a PEQ Filter?
    1:21 Calculating Q
    2:12 Seating Arrangement
    2:35 Calibrate for All Seats
    3:20 Make PEQ Effective for All Seats
    4:00 REW Measurements
    5:55 How to Access PEQ in Your AVR
    6:58 History about Audyssey
    7:55 Designing PEQ Filter
    9:30 Before / After PEQ Results
    12:28 All Seats After PEQ
    13:20 Measurement Resolution Notes
    14:07 Target Calibration for All Seats
    14:44 Seat Location Tips
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 101

  • @u404685
    @u404685 Před 2 lety +3

    Yes, wanna see more how to calibrate subs with mini DSP

  • @ShamuXEagleDriver
    @ShamuXEagleDriver Před 2 lety +17

    A similar presentation using the PEQ function now on SVS Pro subs would be useful and informative to an even wider audience.

    • @overkillonslash
      @overkillonslash Před 2 lety +2

      I wish the svs has a 10 band peq, or at least 5. 3 is just not enough

    • @TylerStout
      @TylerStout Před 2 lety +1

      @@overkillonslash agreed but the only subwoofer I know of that's close in price to SVS with peq is Rythmik and they only have 1 peq.

    • @overkillonslash
      @overkillonslash Před 2 lety +1

      Thats true, somehow i think the dsp in the pb16 could have handled an extra 1-2 filters and be an even better bargain. At this point i think an external dsp solution like the mini dsp 2x4hd would still be much better in optimizing its performance than just relying on the app alone.

    • @eliothillis535
      @eliothillis535 Před 2 lety +1

      I second this! I’d love to see Gene give his tips on it.

  • @SlyNine
    @SlyNine Před 2 lety +2

    This is the kind of content I'm looking forward to

  • @bigpiranha
    @bigpiranha Před 2 lety

    Awesome Gene. Very timely video. appreciated!

  • @RowanTasmanian
    @RowanTasmanian Před 2 lety +5

    Fantastic information Gene. Your presentation and patience for the rest of us is superb. You never talk down, but guide gently through a maze of information. Thanks so much.

  • @davidolchewsky5365
    @davidolchewsky5365 Před 2 lety

    Very nice video and useful info. Gene! Thanks. I like to delve into the 'meat and potatoes' of every aspect from initial setting up a theater to it's final calibration and making every tweek count!

  • @tonymaldonado8116
    @tonymaldonado8116 Před 2 lety

    Thank for that lesson …I understand the way you explain subject.. please keep it’s coming

  • @josephfranzen5626
    @josephfranzen5626 Před 2 lety +1

    Great upload Gene! I use manual PEQ in unison with the automatic filters generated by REW on my MiniDSP HD. Thanks to your very informative series and the community on the Audioholics forum I’ve been able to achieve -/+2dB from 15hz-140hz across 3 seating positions.

  • @filipeperry
    @filipeperry Před 2 lety +1

    Great content as usual! 👏👏👏

  • @frankiejoey
    @frankiejoey Před 2 lety +1

    Exelent video, been waiting for a long time to talk about Active powered speakers for Fronts. I got a pair of Triton Reference Golden Ear set up with two XXL supersubs on the backs....Awesome speakers

  • @esjovold6572
    @esjovold6572 Před 2 lety +1

    Interesting video. I’m always trying learn how to improve my theatre.

  • @bighutch9780
    @bighutch9780 Před 2 lety

    Thank you for the info. This is what I am working on with my yamaha receiver.

  • @petertreyde3212
    @petertreyde3212 Před 2 lety +1

    Thanks, very clear explanation. Something on room curves would be great!

  • @C--A
    @C--A Před 2 lety

    Knew about PEQ for a few years but never used it before. My new 15inch woofer sealed subwoofer has parametric EQ.
    Only one money seat 3 quarters from the front wall in my small living room home cinema.
    I'll definitely rewatch watch the older, & watch future Audioholics parametric EQ videos to learn and put in the knowledge bank!

  • @JonathanDFielding
    @JonathanDFielding Před 2 lety

    Thanks for explaining the simple math behind how to calculate the Q.

  • @wally6193
    @wally6193 Před 2 lety +1

    Yes I'd be interested in seeing how/what you do for your acoustic treatment changes.

  • @peanutbutterjellyjam2179
    @peanutbutterjellyjam2179 Před 2 lety +1

    Gene says that a 21hz peak around 7db needs flattening.😁
    Love your work, Gene.
    Thank you for educating us.

  • @Novilicious
    @Novilicious Před 2 lety +1

    I love this lesson and used it in my Yamaha 5200 processor. What is funny is that i think we all perceive Bass a lot louder when compared with mids and so I needed to go -10 DB in order to flatten out my response.

  • @lawrence09151
    @lawrence09151 Před 2 lety +3

    President of Audioholics!!!!!!!!! Great video! I used the auto EQ in REW and only used like 3-4 whereas it had 10. Smoothed out the response. I also have a low shelf 50Hz 10dB house curve in my mini DSP that I added on top of the corrective filters.

  • @BoredSilly666
    @BoredSilly666 Před 2 lety

    Great video thanks. I have heavily treated my room to get a good response but need to add the finishing touches as I have a 7db peak around 20-35hz I would like to pull down a bit. Thank you edit. I have just realised I havent re measured since filling my whole front wall with 17" depth of Rockwool. I think just by the sound of it it has certainly helped with the rise in the low end. Im using 2 subs. I will remeasure and then use this video to help with PEQ. Thanks

  • @coachgordonpalmer
    @coachgordonpalmer Před 2 lety +1

    Nice intro video.
    In my experience a filter with Q higher than 7 (at bass frequencies) is inaudible. Also Q > 3 can slightly reduce rate of decay.
    For multi seat, multi sub eq the best thing I’ve used by far, is MSO (multi sub optimiser), a free windows based program although I run it on a Mac with a cheap converter app. I have both Audessey and Dirac AVRs and MSO will do a better job in that specific scenario using a Minidsp.
    In my home theatre I have 3 SVS PB-3000’s connected to Minidsp to provide a single sub out on the Arcam. Seating is 2x2 with back row on a riser and seat to seat variation is excellent.

  • @mzmz9355
    @mzmz9355 Před 2 lety

    Hi Gene & thanks again for your effort to bring some education/useful tips to masses! Me myself are now beggining to get deeper into the DSP/PEQ world adjusting my newly built sub and also because of you getting familiar with Q, gain and other phys. quantities. Are you planning some education on input vs output qualization ( benefits of using just output or input or both...)? Thanks

  • @wells2671
    @wells2671 Před 2 lety +2

    Gene, you're the man! 😃 I had a similar bump at 16 hz (4 SB-2000 Pro). I followed your instructions and calculated a -3dB gain with a Q of 2.666. I added that to the input channel on my MiniDSP 2x4HD (since the the individual subs are already using the PEQs in each output channel) and it brought that bump down just as expected. Thanks for the quick tip. Like yours the bump was present at that same frequency at each of my 5 seats, so doing that 1 filter fixed that issue across all seats.

  • @acts9531
    @acts9531 Před 2 lety

    Do one like this about optimizing dialog with PEQ please. That would also be helpful to a very large degree. Thanks!

  • @HiFinest343
    @HiFinest343 Před 2 lety +4

    Great stuff. Would love to see how measurements can be combined to determine what PEQ should be applied to multiple subs in different position. I.E. do you apply same EQ to all subs, or does it vary? Also, how can we get MiniDSP results, without a MiniDSP? Perhaps just using MultEQ X, and the PEQ on SVS subs?? Thanks for all you do!

  • @mohammedisaa9952
    @mohammedisaa9952 Před rokem +1

    Good topic....... it all helps dosent it? 👍🏻

  • @stephenfrancisvoros382

    Nice one Gene, could you do the same featuring Yamaha PEQ???

  • @JaZK825
    @JaZK825 Před 2 lety +1

    Interesting stuff! Would like to see more detail on your measurement process (some may have been in an older vid). For example are you testing L + R at the same time? With one sub at a time or both? Best spot to “hide” in the room so as not to effect measurements? Love the channel!

    • @Audioholics
      @Audioholics  Před 2 lety +1

      You want all subs and the mains playing at same time to see the summed response. Sometimes I do focus on 1 sub if i think I can dial it in better though.

    • @user-if4jg6ul9o
      @user-if4jg6ul9o Před rokem

      I have headphones that need a bump from 2,000 kHz to 12,000 kHz. What octave should I use and what frequency.

  • @TylerStout
    @TylerStout Před 2 lety +2

    More of this please! Bass is really hard to get right and while I like to think I have a pretty good understanding of bass management there's always more to learn. Thoughts on EQing each subwoofer independently?

    • @mohammedisaa9952
      @mohammedisaa9952 Před rokem

      Now thats another quagmire and days with a good mic REWing a room out...... good luck, and well done for realising that a graphic equaliser can be used as a PEQ..... clever man 🙂

  • @okcyurwin
    @okcyurwin Před 2 lety

    Hello, longtime viewer and lover of everything Home Theatre.
    Can you please tell me what smoothing you have applied to the bass reading in REW.
    Thanks 👍🏼

  • @stevemorgan6946
    @stevemorgan6946 Před 2 lety +1

    followinng would ĺuv to have more of this.topic.

  • @roco9504
    @roco9504 Před 2 lety +1

    I’d love to see bass EQ optimization video integrated with transducers like Crowson Tech

    • @mohammedisaa9952
      @mohammedisaa9952 Před rokem

      In all speakers....... or a dsp that can manipulate sounds at speaker wire levels to go inbetween amps and speakers with banana inputs.....and outputs.....

  • @JamieOverTheHill
    @JamieOverTheHill Před 2 lety +3

    Unrelated topic but do you plan on doing a video on the new Audyssey Multi EQ-X app?

  • @Kamuigod2001
    @Kamuigod2001 Před 2 lety +7

    Is this manual method preferable over something like using the EQ function of REW and calculating the PEQ for a MiniDSP 2x4HD automatically?

    • @mohammedisaa9952
      @mohammedisaa9952 Před rokem

      I guess so..... try both methods and see which sounds best to you?......

  • @justinlewis2005
    @justinlewis2005 Před 2 lety

    Do you have multiple mics or do you move 1 mic from seat to seat? Great video!

    • @Audioholics
      @Audioholics  Před 2 lety +1

      currently I just have one mic. I used to have a mic multiplexer which made things easier.

  • @harshjain3801
    @harshjain3801 Před 2 lety

    Hi Gene - excellent information as usual - thank you. One question and one observation:
    1. How much smoothing do you use/recommended for equalising the bass frequencies. The REW manual and some other forums recommend not using any smoothing. Your views and experience would be highly appreciated...
    2. Having used Dirac live on an AudioControl processor recently, I find that I prefer Dirac live 'off' and just used minidsp to equalise my two subs. There has been some recent discussion about room eq solutions not being ideal above the transition frequency of the room. Again - your views would be appreciated.
    Thank you.

    • @Audioholics
      @Audioholics  Před 2 lety +1

      I use 1/24th octave smoothing which is sufficient for fullrange measurements and you loose very little resolution at bass frequencies. I also prefer manual EQ. I haven't had much luck with full bandwidth auto EQ.

    • @harshjain3801
      @harshjain3801 Před 2 lety +1

      @@Audioholics Thank you..

  • @adamjj85
    @adamjj85 Před 2 lety +1

    Great video Gene. Wouldn't something like Dirac Live Bass Control accomplish this and potentially even outperform since it's adjusting impulse response as well and handling multiple subs? I've tried to do manual EQ with REW and compared it to Dirac and Dirac always wins for me.

    • @Audioholics
      @Audioholics  Před 2 lety +3

      In theory yes. In practice I haven't been as lucky as you. I haven't run DIRAC on my new set up though but plan on it soon.

    • @mohammedisaa9952
      @mohammedisaa9952 Před rokem

      Ive heard so much about Dirac..... initially good and now more negative comments, im undecided tbh.....

  • @19mati67
    @19mati67 Před 2 lety +1

    You guys could you please make a video, about how to setup two subwoofers with cheaper avrs, that have parallel sub output? Not everybody can afford the high end ones.

    • @mohammedisaa9952
      @mohammedisaa9952 Před rokem

      Buy a minidsp, then you can have controll of each sub upto 4 individually 🙂

  • @EquesCasurus
    @EquesCasurus Před 2 lety

    Hi Gene, do you always apply the same PEQ to all the subwoofers in a multi-sub or do you use different filters on each sub?

    • @mohammedisaa9952
      @mohammedisaa9952 Před rokem

      Looks like all here, as he did to his 2 fronts, i guess individual would be best, but it would take days REWing your room out to perfection 😂

  • @robertrudd6970
    @robertrudd6970 Před 2 lety

    O.K. I was silently pleading with you during this demo, to also include what I should set the subwoofer controls at. I have a HSU VTF-2 MK5. I have to decide: Phase, crossover frequency, crossover in or out. I only have at this point, half the equation. Can you help?

    • @mohammedisaa9952
      @mohammedisaa9952 Před rokem

      It would require a "home visit" and some specialist audio measuring equipement to take into consideration your home equipement and room acoustics......
      Best you learn yourself, as theres no "Golden" figure here, your circumstances are different to everybody else's...... im surprised you haven't realised this after watching these videos......
      How much knowledge have you in this field? or are you one of the "entitled" who expects everyone else to do your work for you?...........

  • @andyc.3893
    @andyc.3893 Před 2 lety

    For a PEQ filter, the Q is not the ratio of the center frequency to the 3 dB bandwidth. A PEQ filter can have a peak or dip of less than 3 dB, in which case the 3 dB bandwidth has no meaning. But the Q of a PEQ filter always has meaning! Robert Bristow-Johnson (RBJ) wrote a paper called "The Equivalence of Various Methods of Computing Biquad Coefficients for Audio Parametric Equalizers", in which he defines the bandwidth as f2-f1, where f1 and f2 are the two frequencies for which the boost or cut in dB is one-half the maximum (which occurs at the center frequency). So if you had a 10 dB boost or cut, it would be the 5 dB bandwidth. Although he doesn't mention Q in that article (he uses damping factor instead), in another one of RBJ's papers called "Cookbook formulae for audio EQ biquad filter coefficients", he defines the Q in a special way that's a little different from how it's defined in EE filter courses. When you combine the two results (using the Q and bandwidth as RBJ defines them), it works out mathematically that the Q is exactly the ratio of the center frequency to the half-boost/half cut bandwidth. I worked out the mathematical details of that in an article titled "Parametric Equalizer "Q" Definitions and Bandwidth". I didn't post links, as some youtubers automatically delete replies with links in them. A web search (including quotes) should turn up the three articles.
    In the example of this video, the required cut for the filter is about 7 dB, so half of that is 3.5 dB, which is close to 3 dB. This makes the numerical value of Q, computed from the 3 dB bandwidth, very close to the exact value (which would be determined by the 3.5 dB bandwidth in this case). But for other cases where the boost or cut is a lot different from 6 dB, the error will be larger.

    • @Audioholics
      @Audioholics  Před 2 lety

      Thanks for your post. I will tell you nearly 100% of the time I calculate the Q of the bump using fc/(f2-f1) and apply a cut it works as expected with real in-room measurements. It may not be a perfect approximation but it is still an extremely useful tool to use.

    • @andyc.3893
      @andyc.3893 Před 2 lety

      @@Audioholics It's an easy change to use the exact result. If you need, say, a 10 dB cut, the Q is exactly fc/(f2-f1), where f1 and f2 are the 5 dB points. It's exact if you use the half-boost/half-cut bandwidth.

    • @Audioholics
      @Audioholics  Před 2 lety

      @@andyc.3893 Yea its why you make the correction and measure the result and adjust accordingly.

  • @midevil1980
    @midevil1980 Před 2 lety +2

    I think my High Q might be too low to grasp all this...

  • @davidmoeller17
    @davidmoeller17 Před 2 lety

    Gene, I calibrated a basically flat curve from 20-100hz and it sounds as if my subs are not even on. I increased the sub trim by 6db as a baseline and now it curves pretty smooth from 20-80hz but at 20hz its like 15db higher then at 80hz where it meets the mains. Am I crazy that it has to look like this to even hear the sub? I'm in a non-ideal room with no treatment and one sub.

    • @mohammedisaa9952
      @mohammedisaa9952 Před rokem

      Keep tuning, you rich folk will get there in the end....... im too busy helping starving children......

  • @HaraldMacGerhard
    @HaraldMacGerhard Před 2 lety +2

    WAY COOL GENE
    I just close my eyes and hope for the best…. What the he#@ Gene, are you suggesting this is the wrong method 😱🤬
    Or another method, I let Trinnov do the eq and phase correction in the bass and I set the target curve that I like 🤗

  • @stirl22
    @stirl22 Před 2 lety

    Is it possible to benefit from PEQ with only one sub and no measuring equipment and no REW? (I'm using a SVS SB1000 pro in a 12ftx15ft room) Thanks 🔊👌🏻

    • @mohammedisaa9952
      @mohammedisaa9952 Před rokem

      Ofcourse......
      Build a bigger box or buy a kit and transfir the sub driver and amp out of their box...... it will sound a million times better, than sell your box on to reclaim your costs.....

  • @lysine45
    @lysine45 Před 2 lety

    Hi, Gene, may I ask how many subs do you have? 4 Subs? what's the location of the subs? Seems 21hz is the 1st order Standing waves of the length and if you have four subs and get them properly located and time aligned, this standing wave should be able to cancelled using multi-subs. But in your video, it's there, why?

    • @Audioholics
      @Audioholics  Před 2 lety

      My subs aren't optimally located so that is part of the problem. However, the point of multiple subs isn't to cancel standing waves but to create a more even and consistent response from seat to seat by exciting the room modes. This allows EQ to become effective over a wider area as a result. Always better to cut a bump with EQ then cancel it with subs.
      see: mehlau.net/audio/multisub_geddes/?fbclid=IwAR1TavoKfL8rFoH3a2sOB0SpZKTKNFUiJkSk1vNqCnWQwHEYI40BfTeuANc

    • @mohammedisaa9952
      @mohammedisaa9952 Před rokem

      Nice read...... negligible gain from 3 to 4 subs, non from 4 to 5 except headroom....... i also found interesting the comments about room treetment, i never knew there was a difference between low frequency and high frequency room treatments 😱 lol.....
      Thank you 🙂👍🏻

  • @wally6193
    @wally6193 Před 2 lety +2

    That's all good as long as you're not introducing phase shifts with each filter you use.

    • @Audioholics
      @Audioholics  Před 2 lety +2

      You aren't. These are min phase.

    • @wally6193
      @wally6193 Před 2 lety +1

      @@Audioholics okay, what do you consider min phase in the audio band.

    • @Audioholics
      @Audioholics  Před 2 lety +1

      @@wally6193 Before making claims, check the research. Anytime you reduce the amplitude of bass energy in a room with EQ, it also improves the time domain behavior too. A Fourier transform proves this as well.
      www.audioholics.com/home-theater-calibration/bass-optimization-for-home-theater

    • @Audioholics
      @Audioholics  Před 2 lety

      @@wally6193 www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=5163

    • @wally6193
      @wally6193 Před 2 lety

      @@Audioholics Gene, I wasn't making any claims I was simply asking what you consider min phase, or min phase filters.

  • @davidmoeller17
    @davidmoeller17 Před 2 lety

    Gene you have the same dip around the crossover I have, what causes this?

    • @mohammedisaa9952
      @mohammedisaa9952 Před rokem

      Many things, a light fixture in the ceiling, a doorway..... etc etc..... something you both have in common

  • @fahnleindieselschweif5022

    My Yamaha RX-A1060 has only some given frequencies, you can not dial in xx.yy Hz. Thats pretty useless. Has this changed in newer models?

  • @gowthamk5392
    @gowthamk5392 Před 2 lety

    With denon amd audyssey mic hw to do thus bass response!?!

  • @kevind4061
    @kevind4061 Před 2 lety

    Thank you for explaining! I was guessing the Q this whole time. *facepalm*

  • @54tristin
    @54tristin Před 4 měsíci

    Would it have been so difficult to show a sweep using receiver legal sound measurement? We know you have all the toys.

  • @jdm724
    @jdm724 Před rokem +1

    Why would you want to tame down a 20 - 25hz peak? Why would we want big drivers with big amps for output at low frequencies and than tame them down? I dont get it

    • @Audioholics
      @Audioholics  Před rokem +2

      Because frequency peaks are very audible. If you flatten them, you linearize the bass. Then you can turn the bass level up without it sounding bloated or boomy.

  • @Matt-ko5ib
    @Matt-ko5ib Před 2 lety +1

    I don’t think I have enough of a high iQ to be able to do this :(

    • @mohammedisaa9952
      @mohammedisaa9952 Před rokem

      Try....... ask a friend..... lol
      Learning can be fun 🙂

  • @HeavyMetalSonicRM
    @HeavyMetalSonicRM Před 2 lety

    The 'no snake oil' logo shouldn't have the 'no' in it. It's like a double negative.

    • @Audioholics
      @Audioholics  Před 2 lety

      Good point

    • @HeavyMetalSonicRM
      @HeavyMetalSonicRM Před 2 lety

      @@Audioholics Thanks. Just wanted to be helpful. It's usually the other way around!

    • @Audioholics
      @Audioholics  Před 2 lety +1

      @@HeavyMetalSonicRM Can't believe I didn't see that when making it. LOL

  • @juanbaclavab
    @juanbaclavab Před 5 měsíci

    Once you lower a peak on the frequency response of a sub you automatically lose grip and weight in that range and you're not going to have the same type of sound. It'll sound washed out, thinner and less impactful. you think it's just going to lower the volume on that frequency but it's more than that; that's not what the subwoofer wants to play, you're taking away the driver's true and full potential. yes now it's flat but it's a weaker response and it'll affect the type of music and scenes you'll want to hear. Test it with real tracks and songs, not swipe tones, because we're not microphones. That's the downside of EQ'ing. The solution would be perfect speaker/listener placement and mild upping of some dips along with a proper LPF and slopes

    • @saulm5632
      @saulm5632 Před 3 měsíci

      wrong.

    • @juanbaclavab
      @juanbaclavab Před 3 měsíci

      Source? I'm going to guess... ''trust me bro''@@saulm5632

  • @Boyer316
    @Boyer316 Před 2 lety

    And if you're gonna have a hi-q then you're probably a Japanese poet....