Religious parties ask, do you want the laws of God, or the laws of man? But isn't Islamic fiqh based on the human interpretation of the general principles extracted from religious books?
yes, because nothing says modern wisdom quite like following ancient texts to the letter. Truly, the epitome of progressive thinking and open-mindedness! Thats why muslims countries beg world bank and IMF i.e. disbelievers for their next meal. Hamara khao aur hamko hi koso...truly islamic
Sir, If Islam is not a system, Then why Hussain AS went against Ummayed Govt?? I know Islam provide principles and that principles can be used only if our intensions are to establish a Islamic system. Otherwise sood become interest rate.
Assalamualikum wrwb Sir Abi Tk logo nai Islam per Amal kernay ka sirf Kaha Hai Lakin Amal boht kam Kiya jis din Amal howa na Islam per os din hum sb ko Hazrat Omar RA K door E Khilafat Ki misaal daikhay ko milay gi InShahAllah is liyay leaders K kehnay say ya hum or ap K kehnay say Islam per Amal ho hi Ni Jata bul K is K liyay boht hardwork kerna parhta Hai or SB say Barh Tk mohtaki bannna parhta Hai tb ja K islam per Amal ho Jata Hai or jaha Tk ap kehtay Hai K Allah law or hadees Alag Alag cheezay Hai to Hazrat MUHAMMAD SAW wahi Kush kertay that ya kehtay thay Jo unhay Allah Ki taRaf say wahi hota Tha is liyay Islam is complete code of life bus is per AJ Tk boht kam log hi Amal ker pai
@@braveheart8318 1.Every action of Prophet is by God how so? because he had absolute certainty and guidance for 23 years of his life by which he was able to transform that society in every aspect of life such that in upcoming years Muslim ruled from Pakistan to spain in span of hundred years and there were no force conversions to Islam. 2.Why sahaba need to collect the sunnah when they had seen him throughout their life and after the Prophet the 4 caliphs had proper meetings to discuss the issues of states which they obviously learnt from sunnah,for people of this age if you read Quran,you will get the context and sunnah automatically 3.bukhari was not your local LUMS teacher,he was in S-teir during golden age of Islam,one of the best!
اپ نے ریاست اور سیاست کے قرانی تصور کو بالکل اور مروڑ دیا ہے تمام پیغمبروں کی جدوجہد ایک فلاحی ریاست کے قیام کے لئے تھی اور اس محنت کے لئے پارٹی کی ضرورت ہوتی ہے۔اس لیے سب نبیوں نے جماعت بنانے کی جدوجہد کی۔ انسان زمین پر خدا کا خلیفہ ہے اور خلافت خود ایک سیاسی اصطلاح ہے۔ پہلی سورۃ فاتحہ کا بنیادی نفس مضمون ہی وہ انسانی جماعت ہے جو انسانیت کے قلب میں رہ کر اس کی رہنمائی کرنے والی ہے۔
Quran Gives a verse (Principle) then using that verse different olama reach a conflicting result and make conflicting laws. After great efforts the olama just confused us. e.g Talaq Ka masla, Wali k bghair nikah, namaz and Hajj Ka treqa even wuzu par bhi ikhtalaaf ha jiski Ayat clearly quran mn ha
Bukhari, muslim etc didn't exist in the time of imam abu hanif or malik but they were huffaz (people who have memorised hundreds of thousands of ahadith)
I think it should be nature's reality vs man made reality. River, Hills, Forests, Plants, Sun, Moon, Stars are nature based reality. Man made realities are religion, money, nations, scriptures etc..
Great effort…may allah help you in your journey…why I am getting feelings that you are inspired by ghamdi school of thought…?sir ghamdi, Nouman Ali khan and people like you are blessing in disguise for us in this dark century.
sir, Maazrat per apki Islam kay lehaz se boht he weak Knowledge hay fiqh kiya hay aur Islamic laws kiya hay? Apnay sb koch Mix kardiya kiya keh rahay hon sir ap ko koch pata bhi hay ye jo 4 kholafa goozray hay us waqt to ek bhi fiqh nahi the lekin uskay laws aur principles kiya thay? asay principles kay abhi tak us jese ek bhi hokoomat nahi ayee hay please sir jb kese cheez kay baray may elm nahi to please kesi se rabta karay
He is talking lot of sense. For example in matters of divorce, some scholsrs think all 3 dovorces can be given ine one go. Other school of thought says must give one divorce every month for 3 months. Now there is no clear and unambiguous guidance about it in Quran. How will you decide this matter from Quran alone. While scholars difffer on this issue. So pakistani law has clarified, one divorce after every month for 3 months. So you can see man made law is necessary in pite of Quran.
Sir hazrat Muhammad sallah o walayhe wasalam k wisal k baad aisa koie Low nahi k muslim ummah ko kon lead karagay tu Quran Ki aik ayaat jis ka urdu turjuma kuch ye hai K "aye imaan waloun jab kisi muskil main pahans jau tu Allah ki rasi ko thaam lu"lahaza iman waloun ny Allah ki rasi Parker Li or Abu. Baker ko apna kalefa bana lia By ishtaq Hussain qurashi former head of history dep Karachi university
Lets say UNIVERSAL LAW (GOD's LAW} and LOCAL LAW (MAN'S LAW). I fail to understand why you take MULLAYIAT and PEERI and MURDI as ISLAM why not you follow IQBAL RA Interpretation of ISLAM that is the basis of the foundation of PAKISTAN.
Apko itni smjh na ai, ka agr asool Allah ki kitab sa liya gy han to , un usool sa jo bhi qanoon bnen gy wo Allah ka asool ka mutabiq hon gy. Na ka insan apni marzi Ka asoll (principles) ka according qanoon bnana start kr den. Agr apka hath main mice han, to theek bat agy ponchyn ya farz ha ap pa. There is a hell of difference between laws extracted from principles of Allah and man. Man made principles are selfishly for some particular sector of people nor for all humankind.
I believe that Islam provides basic principles in all code of life not that Islam is a complete code of life in all spheres of life. May Allah forgive me if I am wrong.
How can you make laws form the Qur'anic principles when there are different opinions 180 degree apart. The case of Talaq ki Infront of you. So how to decide on which interpretation we should make law. Apart from this Quran has narrated very very long stories but mentioned no simple procedure for Talaq, Namaz .Hajj which are very basic things
@@AfterCollege_hamad From the same Sunna books etc different olama have reached opposite results. If Quran ki ambiguous then Sunna etc is also not giving good results it's giving confusion. You did not get my comment. It's self explanatory.
@@AfterCollege_hamad every olama claim that they have deduced this result from Sunna and hadees and irony is that after great effort they give nothing but confusion
@@ijazawan7865 22 points were presented by Ullema in 1950s that we all agree on this, implement this Which means all they need is a Dialogue just like Theodore Hertzel did for all Jews,he simply called Jews from around the world with same problems and brought them on same page!
@@AfterCollege_hamad yar 22 points have the same problem. Point No2 says that all laws will be made from Quran Sunna.again there are different takes of different olema on various issues so how we decide which to follow. Case of Jews is different from Muslims coz Jews were very limited in the world. This is even not possible in Pakistan let alone the world. How can those olema gather on points in which they call others infidels and even there are many other issues as I mentioned. The point is it is your assumption that so called 22 will do wonder. This has never happened in the history that Muslims gather in such a way. It's a just a theory and practically it's remained to be seen
There are Hudud laws in Quran which have fixed punishment but Shura-Council can make hundreds of Islamic laws through Halal and Haram Injunctions of Quran for all spheres of life. For example: Quran ordains not to call people with bad names. Shura can make law to mitigate that bad practice. False witness is blasted by Quran. So Shura can make a law to punish those people who provide with false witnesses. Quran has called Intoxicant drinking an Act of Iblis. So Shura council can make laws to mitigate that bad practice. Quran has mentioned act of bad people of Nation of Prophet lot as a bigger Sin even than Zina. So Shura council can make law to punish that act. Can Shura council increase 100 lashes to 101 stripes or from 100 lashes to 99 stripes for a Zani? No. Not even Prophet because 100 lashes for Zani is Hudud law. So Quran covers all kinds of laws which an Islamic Government is in need of. But during making Islamic laws; when Shura Council will place other Imams-made fallible books beside infallible Book of infallible God; they will commit Shirk and the laws which they will make will not be Islamic laws. To do so will be adulteration like a man mixes water of pond in milk before selling it in market
Now a person can raise a rational point, which is: then each Majlis Shura of each Muslim Country will impose different punishment for a drinker. Like 20 lashes, other country 60 lashes, and other country 90 lashes. So does it make sense? Its answer is: In Quran, there is no any concept of Muslim country more than one Muslim Country with ONE Majlis Shura in order to have ONE LAW for all; even if that Muslim Country has 3 billion Population. Just see example of USA. They have indeed 50 countries which are united as USA. Same can be done by Muslims
@@abdar-rahman6965 "Just see example of USA" each state (country) has its own system of laws and courts. Kudos to you for your so called rational point of ONE LAW.
@@usama.rehmman *You have dishonestly misused my comments without feeling an shame!.* When I said: those are 50 countries but are united as One Country; I meant: UNITY. I never endorsed man-made law of Unites States. Man-made laws are always full of flaws but God's Law does not have any flaw *because Man (His creature) cannot be wiser than his Creator*
One of the Fundamental differences among man-made laws and God's law is: Approach of Parliament which makes man-made laws is mainly Quantitative, but approach of God's law is mainly Qualitative and core of that approach is Piety 2:177 and Justice 4:135. I give you a few examples: Zardari type person became President of SO-CALLED ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN (where Qari and Mullahs molest kids daily in their Madaaris) through man-made law, but will Quran allow Zardari to become President? NO WAY. In USA, there are some states where a man can marry to a man and a girl can marry to a girl. That became possible through man-made law. Will Quran allow that law? No way. I can post here hundreds of example which debunk man-made laws especially those laws which Contradict laws and Ethical Codes of Quran. *If you make a law which does not contradict Quran's law and ethical codes; that law is ok even in a country whom Constitution is Quran. We will say: that law is sanctioned by Quran; Sanctioned by God*
@@usama.rehmman One of the Fundamental differences among man-made laws and God's law is: Approach of Parliament which makes man-made laws is mainly Quantitative, but approach of God's law is mainly Qualitative and core of that approach is Piety 2:177 and Justice 4:135. I give you a few examples: Zardari type person became President of SO-CALLED ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through man-made law, but will Quran allow Zardari to become President? NO WAY. In USA, there are some states where a man can marry to a man and a girl can marry to a girl. That became possible through man-made law. Will Quran allow that law? No way. I can post here hundreds of example which debunk man-made laws especially those laws which Contradict laws and Ethical Codes of Quran. If you make a law which does not contradict Quran's law and ethical codes; that law is ok even in a country whom Constitution is Quran. We will say: that law is sanctioned by Quran; Sanctioned by God
Dear Dr Sahib, what is the comparison between Hadith codifying by Imam Bukhari and Fiqh ? Shah bukhari isn’t the first Hadith book,its the first Hadith book in “Sahih” movement which is different from earlier compilation of Hadith, Musnaf abi Sheena,Musnaf Abdu Razzaq were written way before that and they survived, there are some other compilations too, so please if you are presenting your argument please check your appropriations of claims before posting it.
Qanoon insan banata hai isko agr maan lein, tu jo Quran mein qanoon hein agr koi unky khilaf qanoon bnae tu AP ki is bary mein kia rae hai, ya koi halal cheez ko Haram krly, second Jo Fiqh compile hui wo Quran aur Hadith sy rahnumai ligi or iska ye matlab nai Jo Banda uthy Fiqh ko murattab krly, is ke liye qualifications required Hoti thi na ke Har shaks uthy or qanoon bana ly jesy democratic countries mein hota hai
You have clearly attempted to demean the "2.45%" of the total āyāt of the Qur'ān by saying that 97.55% of the Quran has nothing to do with laws, state and the related things. I can only lament your understanding. You tell me, there is a single verse in the Quran that says "The only dīn acceptable in front of Allah is Islām, and whosoever adopts anything except Islām won't be accepted from him"..! By applying your understanding of this matter, does it mean this verse is not that important? As it makes just 0.016% of the total verse of the Quran. #Go to the Quran, open and read it by dropping your presuppositions first.
Ok what I understood tell me if I'm wrong the purpose of this video is to tell the public k qanoon insan khd bnata h usool/principles Deen deta! But Deen hi btata na k Kesy qanoon bnany!? & Also agr insan ny qanoon bnany to kia hr koi bna ly? Of course iski requirements hngi na k Kon bna skta & Kon ni & phr jb Allah ny usool dye unki base py Qanoon insaan ny bnay to wo Qanoon insan k Kesy hgy wo to Allah ka qanoon hi hua na???
That is the problem i see either you are misguided or act in this way basically you are cherry picking ayats there is a proper system of khilafat that the prophet muhammad established there are thousands of hadiths and waqias containing information of how that state functions in its basic form
Sir g, ap points ko ku ghumatay hy Its like jb Musa bolay ky mera rab wo hy jo zindigi aur mout deta hay to firon bola nhi ye to meray akhtyar me b hay. Its like jb Allah ny kha ky me ny tumhay rizq dya to badshah bola nhi ye rab ka nhi me ny apny mehnat sy kmaya. Its like jb Allah ny kha ky me ny tumhay zindigi de to Insan bola nhi dekho sb kuch me khud kr rha hu.. Its like jab Anbiyan aur Khulafai rashdeen ny islami nizam kaim kya to wo khy ye law hm implement kr rhy hy to ye hmara law hy Allah ka nhi naoozibillah. Sir I hope these points are exactly with common sense and has hitted on your heart because it's exactly opposite to socialist point of view so mazrat... I think ap jan boojh kr aesa nhi kr rhy blkay ilm ki kmi ki wja sy ap ghlat bol rhy hy... Thanks
Bhai Zina ka khanoon hai Chori ka khanoon hai Property ka khanoon hai Every creature ka khanoon aur outlines hai So on Please start a series what you can gather over laws in Deen would be helpful
every creature? Bhai total 5 jaraim ki saza btai gai Quran e Pak main, further property law personal law main ata hai, agr ik shakhs ny apni jaidad islamic laws k mutabiq taqseem nhi ki aur usky wursa ko is sy koi msla nhi to state ko ye haq kahan sy mil jaega k usy kahy k tum ne state ki marzi sy taqseem krni hai? State tab hi act kry gi jab koi waris apna msla lay k state k pas jaega phir bilkul jo state ne property law ko Quran sy smjha hai wohi implement hoga. Outlines ki to baat Taimur shb ne ki hai k principles diye hain unko smjhne main ghalti to lg skti hai na. and so on? care to add?
Sir , I didn't get the point when you described that imam Muslim ,imam Bukhari compiled their books after the death of famous jurists. Infact those jurists were aware of the Hadith and they derived the Asoool from Quran as well as from Hadith. The differences between them were in other lower levels, for instance how much importance Qias has? How much is the weight of a thing that is done by different companions of the prophet ( P b.u.h), and other things. But they all were very clear about the importance of Hadith. The usual priority was like The Holy Quran, then ,Sunnah, then Authentic Hadith and then other sources. Imam Malik himself has compiled a book on Hadith, Mo'tta Imam Malik. According to Shah Wali Ullah it was almost as authentic as Sahih Bukhari and Muslim.
Quran pak ayat is that if you come in islam then come completely. By studying quran cover to cover from many scholars I have found that every word of quran pak is an order of Allah and in case of orders we cannot debate either it's principle or law. We have to submit without question but yes now muslims all over the world have pathetic conditions so they try to find a safe way in every aspect of life.
Taimur sir, usually I disagree with ur opinions, but this time I totally agree with u. However, I think this video's still incomplete. U should've moved ahead & discussed practically which law is best & closest to Quran's principls, wthr it's comnism, Marxism, Hanafi, Shafi, etc.
This is so big topic that I have to post tons of comments. So better not to comment. But, in Short I can say: According to Quran, it is 100% illegal to make any Islamic law from any other book save Book of God 6:114, 5:44, 16:116, 28:85, 10:15, 6:19, 50:45. Any rite, ritual or Sharia law which does not have *ROOTS* in Quran, is absolutely not Islamic law. *According to Quran, those people who make Islamic laws from other books save Book of God* are هُمُ ٱلْكَـٰفِرُونَ _Before year 722 CE; all Jurists used to make law only from Quran, and they used to say: that any Sharia law made from other books save Quran is erroneous (J. Schacht, Professor "Islamic law," Columbia University, USA)_
It is written in Sunan Darimi and also in other over 25 ancient books that Prophet forbade to write his hadiths. (Darimi was one teacher of Bukhari) It is written in Tabaqaat Ibn S'ad that Caliph Umar burned and banned all hadiths and refused to write Sunnah, and said: La Kitab M'a Kitab Allah". In Islam, no book beside Book of God. *It is written in several ancient books that Caliph Umar placed three companions of Prophet under house arrest FOR LIFE due to their hadith Mongering* It is written by Ibn Bar that Caliph Ali told people to erase all hadiths. Ishaq bin Rahwia was main teacher of Bukhari. He wrote in Masnad that one day when Sahaabi Mu'ad bin Jabal was writing something, prophet came and asked him: what are you writing? He said: your hadiths. Then Prophet told him: It is not needed because Quran is enough. يكفيكم هذا القرآن مما سواه Mu'ad said: after that, he never wrote any hadith.
@@Taimur_LaalHe is a Muslim jis ny Quran read kia hai, usny ayat pesh ki AP is py dalil dein na ke taunt krein, Ya Khamooshi sy comment ko pass krein, I think Kisi scholar ka taunt krna ilm ki Kami hai, ya zyada takabbur hai Jo dosrun ko haqeer smjhta hai
@@Taimur_LaalYup I know the person is Quranist. I want to ask my Quranist bro a simple question Quran clearly states everywhere Hazrat Muhammad SAW is the role model for everyone. By saying everything that relates to Nabi SAW has been changed by people and nothing correct regarding Hadith and Sunnah exist does this mean you’re refuting Quran. Logic is crying in corner.
Sir point to ponder for you all Quran has principles but the problem is that given the same verse of Quran there are different interpretations for example Talaq ka principle quran mn given hai but is k bawjood bhi different olama and sects different results par pohanchty hn. My point is that k aesay halaat mn Quran ka kia faida jb specific quranic principle sy ik Law par consensus nhi ho sakta
Why u did not answer that some laws are complet in quran as u mentioned Ur self...... answer u know it that Ur maktba shaytan ghamdi has failed u , are u even a PhD?
Tmhary pedahis se lekar total universal creations tak jin ka ilm hai jin nai hai sab meh nisaniya hai princle of law jo khud asani peda karta hai par princple of law hie buniyad hai ALLAH HUQ AH WAHID AWAL WA AKHAIR JO JANTA HAI KYA CHUPA OR ZAHIR KYA DILO MEH OR KYA ZAMEN OR ASMANO KYA BARUJO MEH JO JANTA HAI USHE SE RUJO HOTA TUM KON HO ROOH MEH SAB HAI SAHI GALAT JO JANWARO MEH NAI
In that case You're Illetrate. The place where Prophet PBUH left MAULA ALI as his successor, at the same moment he Declared QURAN the only source of Light and key to Success (ofc in terms of After Life) 😇
@@sheheryartalksNo one had the whole Quran except Imam Ali,even Omer,Aisha,Ibn e masood,ibne omer,ibne Abbas considers Quran uncomplete,After the death of prophet Imam Ali brought the full Quran to Abubakr to spread it across but that dumbfook rejected
@@azam_izm Yes, the Sharia demands all "Muslims" to be obedient to the rulers regardless of the way they grab power unless they prevent you from practicing the Islamic rituals. Otherwise, they are free to oppress, kill, plunder, or even side with the enemies. Applying this rule retrospectively, Sharia considers Yazid to be a just ruler and his killing of Imam Hussain and plundering of Makkah and Madina were justified.
This video shows a lack of knowledge in this aspect. Kindly do some more research on this topic and then make a video. You are wrong in this video. And your Islamic knowledge is very weak, but as you have a degree from university, may be that's why you think you know everything . But my dear, you are mistaken.
Dear sab laws hain muqamal sedah stright kis chez ki saza nai chor se lekar qatal tak qabiz se lakar bhotan tak zani se lekar enomic tak len den se lekar shadi divorce tak be sharam ho ap jhote munafiq aesa laghta ab ye kene ka qanoon bhi mohjod hai you totally lair with experienced tum ho kon ho tum wajood meh kis qanoon se pedah huie rooh meh sab hai agar tumhe maloum ho insan khuch nai siwahe aik maqlhloub keh kese la tadat creations insan just rooh ki wajah se afzal per insano ki rooh mar jahe woh kya qanoon bameh ge ap ho kon kis agende se dil meh rooh dimak meh kya hai chote insan bahre bante hain woh phir khuch nai siwahe aik agent woh bho apne hie dusman keh
Sir respectfully I would request that u stick to philosophy and not delve into subject of which you've no clue. Ur analysis will only strengthen the misguided beliefs of polemics.
whoever does not judge (make decision) by what Allah has revealed - then it is those who are disbelievers. (Qur'an 5:44)
yes, because nothing says modern wisdom quite like following ancient texts to the letter. Truly, the epitome of progressive thinking and open-mindedness! Thats why muslims countries beg world bank and IMF i.e. disbelievers for their next meal. Hamara khao aur hamko hi koso...truly islamic
The enthusiasm, commitment and eagerness to educate people, you demonstrate in your videos, is phenomenal. Hats off to you Sir ❤ Love from Oman.
AI generated comment 😂
Very clever. This sounds like an over simplification of a complex subject to arrive at your desired conclusion and mislead the common people.
Very Well Explained Sir ❤
Thank you for the great video
وا استاد جی۔
ویڈیو بنانے کا شکریہ۔
Amazing sir brilliant analysis
Very informative and enlightened views from Dr. Taimur
Excellent way to explain
Love you Sir your work is just awesome
Well explained.
Sir, If Islam is not a system, Then why Hussain AS went against Ummayed Govt??
I know Islam provide principles and that principles can be used only if our intensions are to establish a Islamic system. Otherwise sood become interest rate.
Assalamualikum wrwb Sir Abi Tk logo nai Islam per Amal kernay ka sirf Kaha Hai Lakin Amal boht kam Kiya jis din Amal howa na Islam per os din hum sb ko Hazrat Omar RA K door E Khilafat Ki misaal daikhay ko milay gi InShahAllah is liyay leaders K kehnay say ya hum or ap K kehnay say Islam per Amal ho hi Ni Jata bul K is K liyay boht hardwork kerna parhta Hai or SB say Barh Tk mohtaki bannna parhta Hai tb ja K islam per Amal ho Jata Hai or jaha Tk ap kehtay Hai K Allah law or hadees Alag Alag cheezay Hai to Hazrat MUHAMMAD SAW wahi Kush kertay that ya kehtay thay Jo unhay Allah Ki taRaf say wahi hota Tha is liyay Islam is complete code of life bus is per AJ Tk boht kam log hi Amal ker pai
Mashallah. Appreciate it ❤❤❤
Thats why Sunnah is important which is guided by ALLAH swt so resulting Laws from Sunnah are actually given by ALLAH SWT
@@braveheart8318 1.Every action of Prophet is by God how so?
because he had absolute certainty and guidance for 23 years of his life by which he was able to transform that society in every aspect of life such that in upcoming years Muslim ruled from Pakistan to spain in span of hundred years and there were no force conversions to Islam.
2.Why sahaba need to collect the sunnah when they had seen him throughout their life and after the Prophet the 4 caliphs had proper meetings to discuss the issues of states which they obviously learnt from sunnah,for people of this age if you read Quran,you will get the context and sunnah automatically
3.bukhari was not your local LUMS teacher,he was in S-teir during golden age of Islam,one of the best!
@@braveheart8318 I can,but not in comment section
Well explained as usual
اپ نے ریاست اور سیاست کے قرانی تصور کو بالکل اور مروڑ دیا ہے
تمام پیغمبروں کی جدوجہد ایک فلاحی ریاست کے قیام کے لئے تھی اور اس محنت کے لئے پارٹی کی ضرورت ہوتی ہے۔اس لیے سب نبیوں نے جماعت بنانے کی جدوجہد کی۔
انسان زمین پر خدا کا خلیفہ ہے اور خلافت خود ایک سیاسی اصطلاح ہے۔
پہلی سورۃ فاتحہ کا بنیادی نفس مضمون ہی وہ انسانی جماعت ہے جو انسانیت کے قلب میں رہ کر اس کی رہنمائی کرنے والی ہے۔
❤❤❤ great sir
Keep. On doing this.
Good like always ❤❤❤
Knowledge❤
This is exactly what I have understood after 10 years of studying the Quran and various Islamic subjects.
Quran Gives a verse (Principle) then using that verse different olama reach a conflicting result and make conflicting laws. After great efforts the olama just confused us. e.g Talaq Ka masla, Wali k bghair nikah, namaz and Hajj Ka treqa even wuzu par bhi ikhtalaaf ha jiski Ayat clearly quran mn ha
Wudu pe konsi ayat hai bhai?
@@muhammadtaha9999 surah Maida k shuru par Ayat hai I think teesri ha shyad
Ya Ayyuhallazina amanu iza qumtum....
@@ijazawan7865 sahi sahi, taharat ka hukm hai
@@muhammadtaha9999 to yhi MN keh rha hun k taharat ki ayat ha but ab ham kesy decide kryn k kon ghalat ha? Halanky Quran asaaan bhi ha aur clear bhi
This should had been in form of series of hours on every topic you lifted
Bukhari, muslim etc didn't exist in the time of imam abu hanif or malik but they were huffaz (people who have memorised hundreds of thousands of ahadith)
I think it should be nature's reality vs man made reality. River, Hills, Forests, Plants, Sun, Moon, Stars are nature based reality. Man made realities are religion, money, nations, scriptures etc..
General principles of God
Man's law and Science
Well done comrade
Sai kaha ha sr g further b keci personality ka 7 v log karay please
Great effort…may allah help you in your journey…why I am getting feelings that you are inspired by ghamdi school of thought…?sir ghamdi, Nouman Ali khan and people like you are blessing in disguise for us in this dark century.
Allah bless you Comrade
کیا کمال بات کر دی۔زبردست
Kya karde batoe Kya karde tmhare pedahis law bataya aesa Kya Kamal kardeya batoe
@@ariesco7468 مسلک مذہب شرعیہ فق سب کو مختصر اور بہترین طریقہ سے بیان کیا۔ اصول اور قانون کا فرق بتایا
درست بات ہے قرآن صرف اصول دیتا ہے ۔ان پارٹیوں سے اللہ کی پناہ
sir, Maazrat per apki Islam kay lehaz se boht he weak Knowledge hay fiqh kiya hay aur Islamic laws kiya hay? Apnay sb koch Mix kardiya kiya keh rahay hon sir ap ko koch pata bhi hay ye jo 4 kholafa goozray hay us waqt to ek bhi fiqh nahi the lekin uskay laws aur principles kiya thay? asay principles kay abhi tak us jese ek bhi hokoomat nahi ayee hay please sir jb kese cheez kay baray may elm nahi to please kesi se rabta karay
Exactly. Good point. I can show that even at that time the laws were changing. See my lecture on Hazrat Umar ra.
Have a look at this Maaz.
czcams.com/video/d8rZVT8M5M4/video.htmlsi=b4fKS7pZ_biCSF8r
Tamur bro U refer to Banu ummia or Banu Abbas interpreted islam please focus on islam interpreted by imams
He is talking lot of sense. For example in matters of divorce, some scholsrs think all 3 dovorces can be given ine one go. Other school of thought says must give one divorce every month for 3 months. Now there is no clear and unambiguous guidance about it in Quran. How will you decide this matter from Quran alone. While scholars difffer on this issue. So pakistani law has clarified, one divorce after every month for 3 months.
So you can see man made law is necessary in pite of Quran.
Sir hazrat Muhammad sallah o walayhe wasalam k wisal k baad aisa koie Low nahi k muslim ummah ko kon lead karagay tu Quran Ki aik ayaat jis ka urdu turjuma kuch ye hai K "aye imaan waloun jab kisi muskil main pahans jau tu Allah ki rasi ko thaam lu"lahaza iman waloun ny Allah ki rasi Parker Li or Abu. Baker ko apna kalefa bana lia
By ishtaq Hussain qurashi former head of history dep Karachi university
well my captain
Why you did ot make any video on the incident in the university of malakand ....its just beacuse you are also a teacher thats why
Lets say UNIVERSAL LAW (GOD's LAW} and LOCAL LAW (MAN'S LAW). I fail to understand why you take MULLAYIAT and PEERI and MURDI as ISLAM why not you follow IQBAL RA Interpretation of ISLAM that is the basis of the foundation of PAKISTAN.
❤
Apko itni smjh na ai, ka agr asool Allah ki kitab sa liya gy han to , un usool sa jo bhi qanoon bnen gy wo Allah ka asool ka mutabiq hon gy.
Na ka insan apni marzi Ka asoll (principles) ka according qanoon bnana start kr den.
Agr apka hath main mice han, to theek bat agy ponchyn ya farz ha ap pa.
There is a hell of difference between laws extracted from principles of Allah and man.
Man made principles are selfishly for some particular sector of people nor for all humankind.
I believe that Islam provides basic principles in all code of life not that Islam is a complete code of life in all spheres of life.
May Allah forgive me if I am wrong.
I agree with you - where i live i have seen even pigs doing namaz
All these are null and void
Because all these are human beings Thinks.we don't reality beyond our thought process.
How can you make laws form the Qur'anic principles when there are different opinions 180 degree apart. The case of Talaq ki Infront of you. So how to decide on which interpretation we should make law. Apart from this Quran has narrated very very long stories but mentioned no simple procedure for Talaq, Namaz .Hajj which are very basic things
Because it's mentioned in Sunnah
@@AfterCollege_hamad From the same Sunna books etc different olama have reached opposite results. If Quran ki ambiguous then Sunna etc is also not giving good results it's giving confusion. You did not get my comment. It's self explanatory.
@@AfterCollege_hamad every olama claim that they have deduced this result from Sunna and hadees and irony is that after great effort they give nothing but confusion
@@ijazawan7865 22 points were presented by Ullema in 1950s that we all agree on this, implement this
Which means all they need is a Dialogue just like Theodore Hertzel did for all Jews,he simply called Jews from around the world with same problems and brought them on same page!
@@AfterCollege_hamad yar 22 points have the same problem. Point No2 says that all laws will be made from Quran Sunna.again there are different takes of different olema on various issues so how we decide which to follow.
Case of Jews is different from Muslims coz Jews were very limited in the world. This is even not possible in Pakistan let alone the world.
How can those olema gather on points in which they call others infidels and even there are many other issues as I mentioned.
The point is it is your assumption that so called 22 will do wonder. This has never happened in the history that Muslims gather in such a way. It's a just a theory and practically it's remained to be seen
There are Hudud laws in Quran which have fixed punishment but Shura-Council can make hundreds of Islamic laws through Halal and Haram Injunctions of Quran for all spheres of life. For example: Quran ordains not to call people with bad names. Shura can make law to mitigate that bad practice. False witness is blasted by Quran. So Shura can make a law to punish those people who provide with false witnesses. Quran has called Intoxicant drinking an Act of Iblis. So Shura council can make laws to mitigate that bad practice. Quran has mentioned act of bad people of Nation of Prophet lot as a bigger Sin even than Zina. So Shura council can make law to punish that act. Can Shura council increase 100 lashes to 101 stripes or from 100 lashes to 99 stripes for a Zani? No. Not even Prophet because 100 lashes for Zani is Hudud law. So Quran covers all kinds of laws which an Islamic Government is in need of.
But during making Islamic laws; when Shura Council will place other Imams-made fallible books beside infallible Book of infallible God; they will commit Shirk and the laws which they will make will not be Islamic laws. To do so will be adulteration like a man mixes water of pond in milk before selling it in market
Now a person can raise a rational point, which is: then each Majlis Shura of each Muslim Country will impose different punishment for a drinker. Like 20 lashes, other country 60 lashes, and other country 90 lashes. So does it make sense?
Its answer is: In Quran, there is no any concept of Muslim country more than one Muslim Country with ONE Majlis Shura in order to have ONE LAW for all; even if that Muslim Country has 3 billion Population. Just see example of USA. They have indeed 50 countries which are united as USA. Same can be done by Muslims
@@abdar-rahman6965 "Just see example of USA" each state (country) has its own system of laws and courts. Kudos to you for your so called rational point of ONE LAW.
@@usama.rehmman
*You have dishonestly misused my comments without feeling an shame!.* When I said: those are 50 countries but are united as One Country; I meant: UNITY. I never endorsed man-made law of Unites States. Man-made laws are always full of flaws but God's Law does not have any flaw *because Man (His creature) cannot be wiser than his Creator*
One of the Fundamental differences among man-made laws and God's law is: Approach of Parliament which makes man-made laws is mainly Quantitative, but approach of God's law is mainly Qualitative and core of that approach is Piety 2:177 and Justice 4:135. I give you a few examples:
Zardari type person became President of SO-CALLED ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN (where Qari and Mullahs molest kids daily in their Madaaris) through man-made law, but will Quran allow Zardari to become President? NO WAY.
In USA, there are some states where a man can marry to a man and a girl can marry to a girl. That became possible through man-made law. Will Quran allow that law? No way.
I can post here hundreds of example which debunk man-made laws especially those laws which Contradict laws and Ethical Codes of Quran. *If you make a law which does not contradict Quran's law and ethical codes; that law is ok even in a country whom Constitution is Quran. We will say: that law is sanctioned by Quran; Sanctioned by God*
@@usama.rehmman
One of the Fundamental differences among man-made laws and God's law is: Approach of Parliament which makes man-made laws is mainly Quantitative, but approach of God's law is mainly Qualitative and core of that approach is Piety 2:177 and Justice 4:135. I give you a few examples:
Zardari type person became President of SO-CALLED ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through man-made law, but will Quran allow Zardari to become President? NO WAY.
In USA, there are some states where a man can marry to a man and a girl can marry to a girl. That became possible through man-made law. Will Quran allow that law? No way.
I can post here hundreds of example which debunk man-made laws especially those laws which Contradict laws and Ethical Codes of Quran. If you make a law which does not contradict Quran's law and ethical codes; that law is ok even in a country whom Constitution is Quran. We will say: that law is sanctioned by Quran; Sanctioned by God
❤❤❤❤❤
Wah yar.. wallah app chummmi shummi k qabil hain.
Dear Dr Sahib, what is the comparison between Hadith codifying by Imam Bukhari and Fiqh ? Shah bukhari isn’t the first Hadith book,its the first Hadith book in “Sahih” movement which is different from earlier compilation of Hadith, Musnaf abi Sheena,Musnaf Abdu Razzaq were written way before that and they survived, there are some other compilations too, so please if you are presenting your argument please check your appropriations of claims before posting it.
yes. Of course. But they are not authoritative. And the principle was not established till Imam Shafi.
Qanoon insan banata hai isko agr maan lein, tu jo Quran mein qanoon hein agr koi unky khilaf qanoon bnae tu AP ki is bary mein kia rae hai, ya koi halal cheez ko Haram krly, second Jo Fiqh compile hui wo Quran aur Hadith sy rahnumai ligi or iska ye matlab nai Jo Banda uthy Fiqh ko murattab krly, is ke liye qualifications required Hoti thi na ke Har shaks uthy or qanoon bana ly jesy democratic countries mein hota hai
You have clearly attempted to demean the "2.45%" of the total āyāt of the Qur'ān by saying that 97.55% of the Quran has nothing to do with laws, state and the related things.
I can only lament your understanding. You tell me, there is a single verse in the Quran that says "The only dīn acceptable in front of Allah is Islām, and whosoever adopts anything except Islām won't be accepted from him"..! By applying your understanding of this matter, does it mean this verse is not that important? As it makes just 0.016% of the total verse of the Quran.
#Go to the Quran, open and read it by dropping your presuppositions first.
Are you crazy. There is no demeaning of anything or anyone in my talk. Just facts.
Ok what I understood tell me if I'm wrong the purpose of this video is to tell the public k qanoon insan khd bnata h usool/principles Deen deta! But Deen hi btata na k Kesy qanoon bnany!? & Also agr insan ny qanoon bnany to kia hr koi bna ly? Of course iski requirements hngi na k Kon bna skta & Kon ni & phr jb Allah ny usool dye unki base py Qanoon insaan ny bnay to wo Qanoon insan k Kesy hgy wo to Allah ka qanoon hi hua na???
There is wide scope for interpretation in the entire process.
That is the problem i see either you are misguided or act in this way basically you are cherry picking ayats there is a proper system of khilafat that the prophet muhammad established there are thousands of hadiths and waqias containing information of how that state functions in its basic form
Sir g, ap points ko ku ghumatay hy
Its like jb Musa bolay ky mera rab wo hy jo zindigi aur mout deta hay to firon bola nhi ye to meray akhtyar me b hay.
Its like jb Allah ny kha ky me ny tumhay rizq dya to badshah bola nhi ye rab ka nhi me ny apny mehnat sy kmaya.
Its like jb Allah ny kha ky me ny tumhay zindigi de to Insan bola nhi dekho sb kuch me khud kr rha hu..
Its like jab Anbiyan aur Khulafai rashdeen ny islami nizam kaim kya to wo khy ye law hm implement kr rhy hy to ye hmara law hy Allah ka nhi naoozibillah.
Sir I hope these points are exactly with common sense and has hitted on your heart because it's exactly opposite to socialist point of view so mazrat...
I think ap jan boojh kr aesa nhi kr rhy blkay ilm ki kmi ki wja sy ap ghlat bol rhy hy...
Thanks
Bhai Zina ka khanoon hai
Chori ka khanoon hai
Property ka khanoon hai
Every creature ka khanoon aur outlines hai
So on
Please start a series what you can gather over laws in Deen would be helpful
every creature? Bhai total 5 jaraim ki saza btai gai Quran e Pak main,
further property law personal law main ata hai, agr ik shakhs ny apni jaidad islamic laws k mutabiq taqseem nhi ki aur usky wursa ko is sy koi msla nhi to state ko ye haq kahan sy mil jaega k usy kahy k tum ne state ki marzi sy taqseem krni hai?
State tab hi act kry gi jab koi waris apna msla lay k state k pas jaega phir bilkul jo state ne property law ko Quran sy smjha hai wohi implement hoga.
Outlines ki to baat Taimur shb ne ki hai k principles diye hain unko smjhne main ghalti to lg skti hai na.
and so on? care to add?
Sir , I didn't get the point when you described that imam Muslim ,imam Bukhari compiled their books after the death of famous jurists.
Infact those jurists were aware of the Hadith and they derived the Asoool from Quran as well as from Hadith. The differences between them were in other lower levels, for instance how much importance Qias has? How much is the weight of a thing that is done by different companions of the prophet ( P b.u.h), and other things.
But they all were very clear about the importance of Hadith. The usual priority was like The Holy Quran, then ,Sunnah, then Authentic Hadith and then other sources.
Imam Malik himself has compiled a book on Hadith, Mo'tta Imam Malik. According to Shah Wali Ullah it was almost as authentic as Sahih Bukhari and Muslim.
I agree with your main point of view about laws.
This is a bit of an oversimplification.
I intend to do a detailed video on the canonisation of Islamic fiqh very soon. Then you will better understand its development.
@@Taimur_Laal
Thank you sir
Quran pak ayat is that if you come in islam then come completely. By studying quran cover to cover from many scholars I have found that every word of quran pak is an order of Allah and in case of orders we cannot debate either it's principle or law. We have to submit without question but yes now muslims all over the world have pathetic conditions so they try to find a safe way in every aspect of life.
Taimur sir, usually I disagree with ur opinions, but this time I totally agree with u. However, I think this video's still incomplete. U should've moved ahead & discussed practically which law is best & closest to Quran's principls, wthr it's comnism, Marxism, Hanafi, Shafi, etc.
I hope this is sarcasm
There is nothing like G-d's Law or Man's Law. The Law is basically the Interpretation of the Powerful to control the Masses/Weak.
This is so big topic that I have to post tons of comments. So better not to comment. But, in Short I can say: According to Quran, it is 100% illegal to make any Islamic law from any other book save Book of God 6:114, 5:44, 16:116, 28:85, 10:15, 6:19, 50:45. Any rite, ritual or Sharia law which does not have *ROOTS* in Quran, is absolutely not Islamic law. *According to Quran, those people who make Islamic laws from other books save Book of God* are هُمُ ٱلْكَـٰفِرُونَ
_Before year 722 CE; all Jurists used to make law only from Quran, and they used to say: that any Sharia law made from other books save Quran is erroneous (J. Schacht, Professor "Islamic law," Columbia University, USA)_
It is written in Sunan Darimi and also in other over 25 ancient books that Prophet forbade to write his hadiths. (Darimi was one teacher of Bukhari)
It is written in Tabaqaat Ibn S'ad that Caliph Umar burned and banned all hadiths and refused to write Sunnah, and said: La Kitab M'a Kitab Allah". In Islam, no book beside Book of God.
*It is written in several ancient books that Caliph Umar placed three companions of Prophet under house arrest FOR LIFE due to their hadith Mongering*
It is written by Ibn Bar that Caliph Ali told people to erase all hadiths.
Ishaq bin Rahwia was main teacher of Bukhari. He wrote in Masnad that one day when Sahaabi Mu'ad bin Jabal was writing something, prophet came and asked him: what are you writing? He said: your hadiths. Then Prophet told him: It is not needed because Quran is enough.
يكفيكم هذا القرآن مما سواه
Mu'ad said: after that, he never wrote any hadith.
You are a Quranist?
@@Taimur_LaalHe is a Muslim jis ny Quran read kia hai, usny ayat pesh ki AP is py dalil dein na ke taunt krein, Ya Khamooshi sy comment ko pass krein, I think Kisi scholar ka taunt krna ilm ki Kami hai, ya zyada takabbur hai Jo dosrun ko haqeer smjhta hai
@@Taimur_LaalYup I know the person is Quranist. I want to ask my Quranist bro a simple question Quran clearly states everywhere Hazrat Muhammad SAW is the role model for everyone. By saying everything that relates to Nabi SAW has been changed by people and nothing correct regarding Hadith and Sunnah exist does this mean you’re refuting Quran.
Logic is crying in corner.
@@user-ut7ep7wg8v when did I taint him. I asked him a question
Totally misconception,all of principle and laws all are present he requires to study that one
True
Sir point to ponder for you all
Quran has principles but the problem is that given the same verse of Quran there are different interpretations for example Talaq ka principle quran mn given hai but is k bawjood bhi different olama and sects different results par pohanchty hn. My point is that k aesay halaat mn Quran ka kia faida jb specific quranic principle sy ik Law par consensus nhi ho sakta
Impartial analysis
Why u did not answer that some laws are complet in quran as u mentioned Ur self...... answer u know it that Ur maktba shaytan ghamdi has failed u , are u even a PhD?
I did answer. I said there are a few. Not a complete set. Other laws have to be derived.
Tmhary pedahis se lekar total universal creations tak jin ka ilm hai jin nai hai sab meh nisaniya hai princle of law jo khud asani peda karta hai par princple of law hie buniyad hai ALLAH HUQ AH WAHID AWAL WA AKHAIR JO JANTA HAI KYA CHUPA OR ZAHIR KYA DILO MEH OR KYA ZAMEN OR ASMANO KYA BARUJO MEH JO JANTA HAI USHE SE RUJO HOTA TUM KON HO ROOH MEH SAB HAI SAHI GALAT JO JANWARO MEH NAI
The only thing prophet Muhammad left as a succesor is Imam Ali,not even Quran
In that case You're Illetrate. The place where Prophet PBUH left MAULA ALI as his successor, at the same moment he Declared QURAN the only source of Light and key to Success (ofc in terms of After Life) 😇
Delusional
@@sheheryartalksNo one had the whole Quran except Imam Ali,even Omer,Aisha,Ibn e masood,ibne omer,ibne Abbas considers Quran uncomplete,After the death of prophet Imam Ali brought the full Quran to Abubakr to spread it across but that dumbfook rejected
@@EssamExplore stop chirping,go read Authentic references ,the topic is Ayat e Rajam and Ayat e Raza e kabeer
@@taimoorsheikh9287 bro get out of your cage ASAP you are avoiding Quran and telling me to read some unauthorized and delusional myths 😅...
After studying the Sharia Laws, someone commented -"Not God's Laws, but Man's flaws".
If hv no knowledge of islam then better to mouth shut up...what do you know about islamic jurisprudence...
Did God create man in flawed way, right? God deserves the ultimate blame, if you believe in Him
are you athiest?
@@raxino774 No he made man in perfect way with over 5000 genetic disorders.
@@azam_izm Yes, the Sharia demands all "Muslims" to be obedient to the rulers regardless of the way they grab power unless they prevent you from practicing the Islamic rituals. Otherwise, they are free to oppress, kill, plunder, or even side with the enemies. Applying this rule retrospectively, Sharia considers Yazid to be a just ruler and his killing of Imam Hussain and plundering of Makkah and Madina were justified.
Khuda bhi humure banaya huya hai so khuda ka kuchh nehi hai 😂😂
This video shows a lack of knowledge in this aspect. Kindly do some more research on this topic and then make a video. You are wrong in this video. And your Islamic knowledge is very weak, but as you have a degree from university, may be that's why you think you know everything . But my dear, you are mistaken.
How?
Dear sab laws hain muqamal sedah stright kis chez ki saza nai chor se lekar qatal tak qabiz se lakar bhotan tak zani se lekar enomic tak len den se lekar shadi divorce tak be sharam ho ap jhote munafiq aesa laghta ab ye kene ka qanoon bhi mohjod hai you totally lair with experienced tum ho kon ho tum wajood meh kis qanoon se pedah huie rooh meh sab hai agar tumhe maloum ho insan khuch nai siwahe aik maqlhloub keh kese la tadat creations insan just rooh ki wajah se afzal per insano ki rooh mar jahe woh kya qanoon bameh ge ap ho kon kis agende se dil meh rooh dimak meh kya hai chote insan bahre bante hain woh phir khuch nai siwahe aik agent woh bho apne hie dusman keh
Laaal o laaaal
Sir respectfully I would request that u stick to philosophy and not delve into subject of which you've no clue. Ur analysis will only strengthen the misguided beliefs of polemics.
Thanks for your advice. But you didn’t say what I said was wrong?