Cyberpunk 2077 Ray Tracing Overdrive | RTX 4090 (1440p, 4K, 1080p, DLSS on/off, FrameGen on/off)
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 06. 2024
- Here we look at all sorts of resolutions and settings in the new RT overdrive mode of Cyberpunk 2077 on the RTX 4090.
Test system specs:
CPU: Ryzen 7700X amzn.to/3ODM90l
Cooler: Corsair H150i Elite amzn.to/3VaYqeZ
Mobo: ROG Strix X670E-a amzn.to/3F9DjEx
RAM: 32GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5 6000 CL36 amzn.to/3u563Yx
SSD: Samsung 980 Pro amzn.to/3BfkKds
Case: Corsair iCUE 5000T RGB amzn.to/3OIaUsn
PSU: Thermaltake 1650W Toughpower GF3 amzn.to/3UaC8cc
Monitor: LG C1 48 inch OLED amzn.to/3nhgEMr
Keyboard: Logitech G915 TKL (tactile) amzn.to/3U7FzA9
Mouse: Logitech G305 amzn.to/3gDyfPh
What equipment do I use to make my videos?
Camera: Sony a6100 amzn.to/3wmDtR9
Camera Lens: Sigma 16mm f/1.4 amzn.to/36i0t9t
Camera Capture Card: Elgato CamLink 4K amzn.to/3AEAPcH
PC Capture Card: amzn.to/3jwBjxF
Mic: My actual mic (AT 3035) is out of production but this is a similar mic (AT 2020) amzn.to/3jS6LEB
Portable Mic attached to camera: Rode Video Micro amzn.to/3yrT0R4
Audio Interface: Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 3rd Gen: amzn.to/3wjhlad
Greenscreen: Emart Collapsable amzn.to/3AGjQXx
Lights: Neewar Dimmable USB LED amzn.to/3yw4frD
RGB Strip Backlight on desk: amzn.to/2ZceAwC
Sponsor my channel monthly by clicking the "Join" button:
/ @danielowentech
Donate directly to the channel via PayPal:
www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_...
Disclaimer: I may earn money on qualifying purchases through affiliate links above.
Chapters:
0:00 Overdrive, DLSS Off, 1440p
2:24 Overdrive, DLSS Quality, 1440p
4:38 Overdrive, DLSS Quality, Frame Generation, 1440p
6:51 Overdrive, DLSS Off, Frame Generation, 1440p
8:59 Ultra RT, DLSS Off, 1440p
10:59 Overdrive, DLSS Off, 4k
13:27 Overdrive, DLSS Quality, 4k
15:17 Overdrive, DLSS Quality, Frame Generation, 4k
17:19 Overdrive, DLSS Balanced, 4k
19:14 Overdrive, DLSS Performance, 4k
20:58 Overdrive, DLSS Performance, Frame Generation 4k
23:03 Overdrive, DLSS Off, 1080p - Věda a technologie
Anyone have time to make timestamps for each resolution and setting? I had to leave for work before having time to do it myself. Upvote correct ones, I can add a good one to the video later on a break at work.
0:00 Overdrive, DLSS Off, 1440p
2:24 Overdrive, DLSS Quality, 1440p
4:38 Overdrive, DLSS Quality, Frame Generation, 1440p
6:51 Overdrive, DLSS Off, Frame Generation, 1440p
8:59 Ultra RT, DLSS Off, 1440p
10:59 Overdrive, DLSS Off, 4k
13:27 Overdrive, DLSS Quality, 4k
15:17 Overdrive, DLSS Quality, Frame Generation, 4k
17:19 Overdrive, DLSS Balanced, 4k
19:14 Overdrive, DLSS Performance, 4k
20:58 Overdrive, DLSS Performance, Frame Generation 4k
23:03 Overdrive, DLSS Off, 1080p
0:50 1440p RT Overdrive, Native
2:42 1440p RT Overdrive, DLSS Quality
4:40 1440p RT Overdrive, DLSS Quality + Frame Gen
6:58 1440p RT Overdrive, Native + Frame Gen
9:04 1440p RT Ultra, Native
11:15 4K RT Overdrive, Native
13:26 4K RT Overdrive, DLSS Quality
15:31 4K RT Overdrive, DLSS Quality + Frame Gen
17:22 4K RT Overdrive, DLSS Balanced
19:17 4K RT Overdrive, DLSS Performance
20:56 4K RT Overdrive, DLSS Performance + Frame Gen
23:16 1080p RT Overdrive, Native
I will do it if you give me your RTX 4090 😛
@@FATBOY_. bruh
@@ghost085 Most upvotes, so I'll add these as my official and check later. Hopefully it's correct lol! Thanks!
PAthtracing is actually the real raytracing, the previous raytracing was a mixture of technologies. IT's fascinating to see that this si possible to be done in real time.
Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia
@@shanent5793 yes
not really
It's still not fully pathtraced, but close
@@maegnificant can you say what isn’t path traced? From all the things I’ve watched at no point was it mentioned otherwise. But I’d like to know more
I applaud you for all the time you take to do these tests and work and take care of family life as well. Grats........
Sorry for the late timestamps saw your upload notif late.
0:06 Overdrive 1440p DLSS & Frame gen off High texture preset
2:24 Overdrive 1440p DLSS Quality
4:39 Overdrive 1440p DLSS Quality Frame gen On
6:53 Overdrive 1440p DLSS Off Frame gen On
8:58 RT Ultra 1440p DLSS & Frame Gen Off
10:58 Overdrive 4k DLSS & Frame Gen Off
13:27 Overdrive 4k DLSS Quality
15:17 Overdrive 4k DLSS Quality Frame Gen On
17:19 Overdrive 4k DLSS Balanced
19:14 Overdrive 4k DLSS Performance
20:57 Overdrive 4k DLSS Performance Frame Gen On
23:02 Overdrive 1080p DLSS & Frame Gen Off
Are you the designated time stamp guy?
Thanks
@@DystopianUtopia8 Nope he does them himself
Thanks, yeah I usually do them myself but I ran out of time before work and still wanted to post the video.
I'd love to see u test some more GPUs. Good stuff as always
In regards to image quality when using DLSS, it is important to note that you have it set on default sharpening which is way too low in my experience. As least for my monitor, I use 0.25 or 0.3 sharpening.
Forgot which one but some recent change to dlss the sharpening slider doesn't do anything anymore even if it's there cause of artifacts caused by sharpening they gone this way and want you to use filter or nvcp sharpening.
Since dlss version 2.6 you need to use a separate sharpening filter like one of the ones built into geforce experience. The ingame slider does nothing.
@@toby1248 It does now. It probably uses the NIS sharpening that was needed since 2.5.1, which is what Nvidia wants.
and hes uses 80 FOV which is way too low
Great video! Keen to see how a 4080 performs.
I really dislike how so many are trying to clown on this tech yet they have no idea what RT or PT even is/does. It doesn't even matter if it only runs using Frame gen and DLSS rn... The devs themselves literally said its for future tech and future proofing the game. But you have the option to see what is essentially going to be the future of lighting now if you have a 4080 or 4090. Also you are not forced to run this on any card and you easily turn it off so I don't get why some are arguing that its forcing people to buy overpriced cards.
this looks fascinating!
Damn, 4090 is already a 1080p card
Wake up samurai we have an 8GB gpu to burn
Jelly 🤣
@@pedropierre9594 Can always use the 20GB on a 7900 XT to play at 6 fps while pulling 450W.
@@joeallen7781 That's actually what I'm gonna do, it's just gonna be my 6950 XT with 16GB doing 3 fps
@@MisTTwisted so then its not what youre gonna do lol
Hey Daniel it might be interesting to see if there is a performance uplift in regular Psycho RT mode now that SER has been implemented.
Started watching Tech Jesus' video on this...saw that you did a video as well...clicked on your video 2 minutes into Steve's video....wtf? You're pretty good at this CZcams stuff.
Thanks for sharing
I love the fact that you tested native 1080p at the end, could you try native 1080p BUT with DLAA? To see if it helps with the bluriness, in theory we should get something similar to 4K with performance DLSS since DLAA has the AI AA pass too :)
Can confirm that the patch upgraded DLSS version to 3.1.1 previously it was 2.3.4
Watching some videos, shadows a plenty, lighting spreads further and adds color/brightness further into the scene, reflection quality got boosted too.
Reflections and shadows are most noticible and lighting you see it everywhere and nowhere depending on scenes, sometimes a big deal for a scene, sometimes not..
Still impressive considering the technology that is path tracing in n open world,.. not even built with path tracing in mind during devtime.
Personally I think dlss balanced might be really good here. Balanced +, frame generation gives 70-80 fps and looks better than performance. Always tends to be kind of ignored as the in between setting
Where did u see test with balanced and fg on?
@@matacachorro4090 on my own rig. Got a 7900x 4090 combo and in what little time I had to test just loading an save at night ,middle of the city , raining got about 70 + on average with some dips in the 60 but consistent above 60 so it looked good
@@KagariTeru Damn, the fact you can play Cyberpunk now with path tracing at 4k is mindblowing. It's not close to native 4k, but still
@@luukherfst1209If it looks good in 4k, what's it matter if it's not close to "NaTiVe 4K har har"? 🙄
Nice video! When are you upgrading to the 7800X3D? 😮🥳
The DLSS is definitely better than it used to be. Recently I went back to play a bit of the game and DLSS quality mode now looks better than native imo.
You get more done by 7am than most CZcamsrs do all day!
Nice comparison. But it might be better with a summary table in the end.
If possible can you do a deep dive into reflex with boost mode on vs normal reflex on why some game allow you boost mode at native and some don't?
Thanks for the video!
I guess it indirectly shows once again that my 4070TI wasn't the worst decision one could make (for 1440p, I do not use 4K).
this raytracing pathtracing for cyberpunk i think is another maneuver for selling 4070ti, because is overprice sad to say this to you but is reality
@@SACBartdon't be jealous because others spend their money on gaming hardware.
@@n.erdbeer i love this tipe of society of """"GAMERS"""" we live now..... nvm i got money for buying 4090 and your family too but the problem is people have no limit to decency and waste money for 1-2 games who drop after 2 weeks(don't know how to explain you but with logic you got it )
@@SACBart you are not in a position to judge. It doesn't matter what you or anyone can afford.
💯 love my 4070ti
Thanks for a work! Would be nice to see how capable is amd gpu's in that scenario(rtx 3080 10gb too). And also how it demands the cpu. On nvidia video there was cpu bottleneck in some scenes on a I9 12900k.
Well i can provide some numbers i got with my 3080 12gb 350w version runing Overdrive and DLSS quality 1440p.
Avarage FSP 34,31
Min FPS 14,93
Max FPS 46,32
With RT: Ultra and DLSS quality at 1440p i got the following.
Avarage FPS 67,53
Min FPS 51,39
Max FPS 84,10
@@dutchnieuwnick301 Well, i could run it in overdrive mode. I guess they say it is supported by 4070 Ti and above because the performance is crap on anything else.
@@dutchnieuwnick301 in the menu it says this mode should be used only on 3090/4070ti and above. basically u can turn it on on every rt supporting gpu
@@nelsing1978 that's pretty rough...
would be nice to see XeSS FSR and DLSS comparison
I know you’re running this on the 4090 since nobody but me got a 4080, but the 4080 @ 1440p holds 65-80fps with DLSS + FG (Quality) and the ultra Preset. If you’re willing to run DLSS on Balanced or Performance, it breaks 100.
It doesn’t dip below 63 for me. I did my testing in Corpo Plaza, JigJig Street, and Redwood Market.
Hey, I got a 4080 as well 😅
Will buy a 4080 as well
I don't know if you'll see this, but can u run overdrive on a 4080 1440p with dlls?
I just like how the trees look in that mode . Crazy . I get 1 fps in this mode for sure
Daniel is right , I don’t know what they did to DlSS, but tia looking great. I was never able to use DlSS performance, because for me the visual quality loss , made less sense than turning Rt a bit lower.
But DlSS performance is looking pretty sharp!!
DlSS performance + frame gen is definitely the way to go with overdrive
DLSS performance also looks good in Portal RTX, which is also path traced.
be interesting to see FSR 3, I know it won't be better than DLSS 3, but it may resurrect some of those older cards if it works on all.
Yep, not sure how smart a business move it is for AMD to not lock it off, but certainly good news for consumers. Xess is also getting an update.
Im using a 4080 laptop and 1913950h. The performance you can expect is about 60-75 fps using dlss3, and dlss quality at 1400p/1600p at max performance. I'm getting 45-60fps if I use the more balanced settings on my laptop.
It works! but you need to use frame gen to get this playable. I would think on last gen gpus you may be looking at more of a 30fps experience.
using frame gen gives me awful movement latency, the game looks great but its almost unplayable
@@thejoeman4774 If you can reduce settings/resolution to where you are getting around 90fps or more with frame generation, the latency becomes less of a problem.
Hey. Why do you use old Nvidia driver? The latest is 531.41 with Cyberpunk 2077 Overdrive mode optimizations.
531.58 is even newer
In the end why were you wondering whether it could handle 1080p native when it could handle 4K DLSS Performance without Frame Generation earlier?
I'm impressed by how he can upload so often despite having a full-time job as a teacher
What do you think about the image quality of DLSS versus FSR 2.0? I assume you've done a video comparing the two before?
Dlss performance = fsr quality more or less
I never thought it would be this soon I would see the almighty 4090 get brought down to 21fps average at full power.
Full PT is two gens away at least as its insanely resource hungry and will probably need bespoke hardware. A 6090 will do the trick and a steal at the price of your first born child.......
Do you plan on also testing this with the 4080?
The latency was lowest with frame generation on. With reflex the latency penalty is the exact same as dlss2 on a 3000 series gpu. 7-8 milliseconds is hardly noticeable compared to the nearly 30ms without any upscaling, and the 15 avg ms with dlss2
Oh whoops I missed the bottom latency times through reflex. I wish you would’ve went back and compared dlss quality no frame generation right after you saw the latency for dlss quality with frame gen on.
Frametime is the difference in ms between each frame. Since FG generates frames in between real frames, of course frametime latency would improve. But that isn't the actual latency you feel. Since FG generates frames seperate from your inputs, it does not actually improve perceived latency. At best, latency stays the same and at worst, it adds additional latency.
Great, can't wait to test this on my RTX 2060 😒
This brings to question to me how well frame generation will be as its developed, because dlss when it first came out was terrible, now its an excellent tool most people agree is worthwhile but the same can not be said about frame generation at least for now, maybe by 6000 series the AI algorithm will able to generate frames in motion so well that even when slowed down to nitpick is barely noticeable.
In my experience it depends a lot on the game. The additional input latency in Hogwarts Legacy and Witcher 3 was completely unnoticeable, but in Cyberpunk it was juuuuust enough to be annoying. The game was still pretty responsive so I wouldn’t say it’s unplayable, but it was just barely enough input latency to at least be mildly irritating.
That said I think it’s a very promising start that will only get better
@@TheCanadian0495I agree witcher 3 with dlss + FG is just beautiful.
It's funny how CPU affects performance when it comes to raytracing and dlss. I'm on 7950x3d + RTX 4090. In overdrive, dlss off i've got just few frames more on avarage however overdrive + dlss quality + frame generation gives 30 more avg and max fps :)
Why not show all Dlss option ON with DLSS active in your setting. I use it with all on Ultra in 4k with my Asus strix 4090 OC RTX ? I see its the only other option you haven't shown here.
How many fps in 1440p rt overdrive with dlaa with and without frame generation?
Yes please! I'd like to see the overdrive performance with 4070ti at 1080p cause that's the resolution I'll be likely to be playing it with
difference from path tracing is extremely hard to notice at 4K already, Path tracing at 1080p is completely useless
@@Tigerhearty Well, not like I'm going to play with a 4k monitor or anything. I'm fine gaming at 1080p, as I always have been for years. So it's a given that I want to know how a 4070ti will fare in that regard.
@Furious TV you're completely useless
in my opinion DLSS is only for resolution of 4k and higher.
below it just makes the image quality a lot worse that you are better off lowering other settings. with a few, few exceptions.
You’re delusional
When are you doing a 7900xtx or 6950xt
Personally I love DLSS in Cyberpunk. I actually prefer it over Native res with the sharpness slider turned all the way to 1. It looks sharper than native to me while not being oversharpened in any way. I made a couple comparison shots just for myself and the degradation in detail between 1440p native and 1440p DLSS performance was minimal. I had to zoom in A LOT to notice tiny miniscule degradations in quality that you would otherwise NEVER notice.
So for Cyberpunk DLSS is perfect. I really want to recommend this to you Daniel: crank the sharpness up. of course it is subjective but imo it gets rid of the blurriness that DLSS has :D
I hope your screenshots were made while moving, because otherwise it's almost meaningless
@@vinylSummer Uhh no. How tf am I supposed to make comparable screenshots while moving?
Also I played a lot of Cyberpunk and regardless of whether you're moving or not, the sharpness is significantly increased so your objection is pretty nonsensical. Where does that even come from?
@@kaystephan2610 upscaling techniques work quite well with still images (when you're not moving). It's usually the movement when things ghost, get blurry and all the other great stuff.
Also some people prefer oversharpened images even to original quality ones, so if you're that kind of man, you should try cranking the sharpness slider on your monitor. Don't worry if there won't be a "Sharpness" setting, it might be called some stupid marketing name
@@vinylSummer I have tested DLSS a lot in Cyberpunk. Back when the sharpness slider was not a thing I just could not get myself to like it because it always had a very noticable blurriness to it. It always felt "softwashed" and a lot of detail got lost. With the sharpness slider this does not happen anymore. The Image is not OVERsharpened. It just looks clearer as if now the native image lacks details in some spots where the DLSS performance sharpness 1 image has more detail.
I also experimented with the sharpness slider of the menu of my monitor and I set it to a value I like - one that is not too sharp and not too soft.
Bro dlss sucks in this game. Very bad shimmering even at dlss quality. N i dont even wanna say anything about fsr
guessing theres no way to get the 7900xtx running this to where it's worth using? would be cool to see the 4080.
I decided to go ultra, with ray tracing on psycho, except local and sun shadows. DLSS qualitty on 95% sharpening. Get around 80-120 with 4090 and 12900k
24:51 is 1080p i think . So i think that 1440 p with overdrive and DLSS 3.0 and Ultra settings is the best for shooter fighting style . But i wish that you work in your videos with timecodes or timestripes .
Timestamps are available now, I didn't have time before I left for work.
Wait if I'm seeing that setting menu right, could you use DLSS, FSR, and XESS active all at the same time? I think that would be hilarious
It is god damn gorgeous those of you that won’t get the chance to experience it. Our future is bright with where things are heading
i am quite surprised at how not shockingly bad this runs. For the record i have been playing with a 3070 at a DSR resolution of 2176x1224, all max with path tracing and DLSS Performance and 44 fps in the benchmark honestly doesn't sound too bad to me. there is quite a lot of shimmering and overall softness because of the low dlss and overall slightly lower resolution than 1440p but honestly, i can definitely see myself playing the next dlc like this. If AMD releases their fsr3 and a modder/devs implement it cyberpunk with path tracing might actually be a viable option with a non 40 series card
A few important notes for cyberpunk enjoyers;
Disable Film Grain (Had it on for a more stylized playthrough, but the dlss starts blurring most of the image)
If your hardware allows it, turn off dlss, but keep frame generation; You can't see it in the benchmark, but the rainy weather and any kind of fog become blurry with frame gen and dlss
Also, I'm playing on an RTX4080 on 1440p and get around 80 frames with frame generation enabled and no dlss.
There are still some glitches, avoid fast turns, since the light needs some time to render (pulling 180 degree shots, can feel like you're live rendering a blender project)
The car reflections on glass work perfectly, but the metal surface often looks, oddly enough, like a low resolution texture if you just inspect it closer. And by closer, I mean standing in front of the car.
And one personal annoyance: Your character still won't be reflected to any surface, so you won't see yourself in shop- or car windows, smooth surfaced buildings or any other reflectable surface..
(I'd personally gladly take a 10fps hit, if that means I can see my character in my respective car window)
😂
the fact that you made this entire video before leaving for school is insane. you are definitely someone with a strong work ethic and the kids who get to have you as a math teacher are insanely lucky
Maybe the next generation is ready for pathtracing but what is after pathtracing?
When dealing with frame generation, I think you should do gameplay as well. I know that showing how a game feels is hard and that a playable latency is subjective, but at least you saying something like 70ms latency feels quite playable or unplayable could give an idea. When coming to an age with frame generation, a lot of gamers know for them what is a playable frame rate, they wouldn't know what to them is a playable latency.
im just glad that ray tracing isnt just making the ground and floor structures look like glass isnt a thing with this game. i feel when ray tracing would be showcased it always looked like the environment had recently got rain when it would in fact be dry as arizona. cyberpunk did it the right way
Hi man, can you test the 7900xtx?
If you have Frame Generation and Dlss on counts it still as native resolution?
If i read that right, with DLSS off at 4K, you get 19 fps. With DLSS 3 Frame Gen on, you get 95 fps. Does that mean only 1 in 6 frames are actually rendered, and the rest are generated?
Me still using my 1080p 240hz monitor. also with an RTX 3060 12gb gpu. and an i3 12100f with 32gb ram and an nvme m.2 ssd
I see barely any difference beyond 1080p other than lower fps lol.
My eyesight isn't that great to see beyond 1080p anyways. but high refresh rate is very noticable to me and its very pleasing to play games with 240FPS+ on my monitor.
Finally a Good GPU to play games in playable Full HD. Nice
Uncharted 4 and the lost legacy’s lighting is as close to what you can get to ray tracing without the actual ray tracing without the performance hit. I like good visuals but also smooth gameplay so on my 4070 ti I have to have it set to off. With DLSS I do get about 50 fps though but I don’t like the input lag of DLSS and the noticeable downgrade in quality.
Do you think if you had a 7800x3D you would have gotten more fps?
WIth Erok and Scorn's mod i got 4k DLSSP + FG 115-130 fps and arround 40-45 ms latency. Or 85+fps without FG and +- 30ms latency. Without FG runs better i think due to latency.
finally we have a card to play cyberpunk with ray tracing and path tracing in 1080p, yay
For some odd reason, I'm getting lower performance on the benchmark, not by a lot, but the avg is 121, the minimum is 100, and the max is 152. With a 4090 and ryzen 9 7950x
o.k. wake me up in 5 years.
On 4090 4K with DLSS Quality, Frame Generation Overdrive and max everything I get about 60-65 fps. A dramatic decrease.
With DLSS Performance fps goes even higher.
Pretty happy with what I'm getting from my 4080 and 5900x. Running at 1440p DLSS balanced with frame gen and some key settings dropped to medium. Still looks great on my display and I get 70-116fps depending on the scene. Feels super smooth on my VRR display. Extremely playable 👍
What about 4k? Because I would like to upgrade my 3080 to a 4080
@@Haru-pc1sm Just tried 4K RT Overdrive on my 4080 with Frame Gen + DLSS Performance . I got 72 fps on average with 5800x3D
@@Haru-pc1sm buying 4080 when you have 3080? waste of money, wait for 4080 Ti, or better 5080 :)
@@Sebbz With frame generation, do not forget to mention that
@@dhaumya23gango75 ofc, thanks. Forgot to put Frame gen in 👌
i got 5800x it bottlenecks my 4090 i was just wondering.... should i go 7800x3d or just wait for next gen ?
Swan song of the red engine i assume.
Keep in mind that Cyberpunk is a game that gets massive fps gains from dropping res or using upscalers, because almost every graphical effect on the screen scales with resolution that includes ray tracing, that's why on 4k cyberpunk is demanding and to be frank you lose quality and precision on almost everything (tracing less rays as well), so 1080p with rtx 4090 feels kinda sad ngl. Certainly impressive, but considering that this engine will no longer be used it feels like a waste of resources and just mandatory nvidia paycheck for CDPR, would rather have them work on UE 5 to prepare it for their future games, that includes possibility of adding path tracing like right here, but for future games, oh well.
I know i invested well on the 4090
I have the same setup 7700x + 4090. Do you have the same bug as most people that when you open and close any menu during gameplay the game frametime takes a hit of 2-3 seconds while loading all the DLSS + Raytracing?
i cant enable frame generation on cp2077 do u know why i have 4070ti its like gray cant enable
@@Kavosnives are you playing in full screen mode ? That's a must for FG sometimes to work
I also would like to see 1440p, ultra RT, DLSS 2 Off Frame generation On. Is this possible?
I ran this benchmark on my 4090 system. It has a bunch of visual glitches. Don't know if it's my drivers or it's cyberpunk.
What I'd really like to see is similar corners and enviroments on the Matrix demo vs overdrive Cyberpunk. That would show us if good enough is actually competitive to this un-optimised approach (basically make it as bad as possible) to make people itch for a new gen. This mode is an ad paid for Nvidia and despite what DF published, for the large majority of gameplay situations is actually indistinguishable from Psycho. Member hairworks, this is hairworks on steroids. Lumen looks and feels like a much better approach to GI and AO than this stone mason's implementation.
I believe frame generation helped a bit against terrible pop-ins. (or not)
Yeah unlikely there is no correlation between both options
I am actually quite surprised that it was playable on my rtx 3070 at 1440p. A few times I even got 60 FPS
Did it look much better than rt psycho to you?
It looked the same or worse to me.
60 fps with what , dlss ultra performance ?
@@ajs0350Either you have a problem in vision or are just coping. Rt overdrive vs psycho rt has a bigger difference than psycho rt vs rt off altogether. There are comparison videos, you can check them out.
@@dhaumya23gango75 all settings max, with dlss on balanced
@@dhaumya23gango75 I can't agree to this. The difference between rt on and off is massive, but the difference between rt psycho and overdrive is noticeable, but subtle
The cost is unimportant. What matters is that it is the most realistic lighting technique as of yet
What monster do you have ?
Do you still have the 7900xtx? Could you test it there?
It will be a massacre
I’d love to see if a 3080 could run this and what settings would be best for it
I have a 3080 12GB, I run it in 2k DLSS to performance at 40/50fps, sometimes it touches 60 fps and in the desert it even touched 80fps
Edit: There are some places where it goes below 40 but never seen it below 35
Path tracing is the real ray tracing
Let's try 4080 and 4070 ti maybe?
The lag is pretty bad with FG. It doesn't look like but my brain feels something is wrong with the game.
i tried to see if i would get the same number and i did niice. i did it at 1440p with overdrive on and framegen on and dlls quality and got the 130fps at the end the only diff is that i have the Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core
cooling is impressive on the 4090 still.
what with 4080? cyberpunk pirate repack of 1.62 isn't released yet, but i'm so interested for new graphics features for my 4080
Probably about 45% slower than 4090 numbers.
@@Phil_529 36 FPS Not Great Not Terrible, I guess
Highest RT setting before Overdrive was Psycho, not Ultra.
Can you please tell me the full name of your 4090?
Man the lighting looks absolutely gorgeous with Path Tracing. When the Phantom Liberty expansion releases, I think I will use Path tracing with DLSS quality on my 3440x1440 OLED display. I'm glad I decided to go for the 4090 instead of a 4080.
4070ti for 1440p, 4090 for 4k. Thats it
The 4080 has the worst value of these 2, its in the middle of nowhere.
I realize this is a tech demo, one of those just because you can doesn't mean you should type of things.
I don't understand why people don't pay any attention to DLDSR. Combined with DLSS Performance it performs slightly better and looks significantly better than native. It's upscaling from 1440p to 5K and then downsampling to 4K. It sounds weird but works exceptionally well. Native is practically dead to me when DLSS is available unless it's a bad implementation like in RDR2. I either choose Quality, Performance or DLDSR + Performance.
Latency is kinda bad when u go higher. Looks great but inputs dont seem responsive
Thanks for the DLDSR reminder. I just tried x4 on Bioshock remastered and it's great, plenty of fps and low latency and much better graphics. Guess gpu wasn't doing much work before. Think i'll use it on desktop to get more of the spreadsheets visible. (didn't have much luck using it in cyberpunk)
I will use Dlss balance + Frame generation at 4k.
Do you think that native 1440p looks better than dlss performance at 4k on a 4k screen?
i cant enable frame generation on cp2077 do u know why i have 4070ti its like gray cant enable
@Muhammet CEBECİ I don't know but maybe you could verify files of the game and make sure you got the last Nvidia driver or maybe roll back.
(Not an expert)
Some PS5 games have over 150ms latency, so IMO 60ms with FG enabled is more than playable.
What did it cos? Everything
3080 12gb dlss performance I’m getting 59fps (fsr2 58fps just curious) average in benchmark 1440p, not bad I guess
NGL the shadows of the trees changing back and forth at 3:50-4:00 kinda bother me.