Tomahawk VS Kalibr: Which Cruise Missile is the Most Powerful?
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 06. 2024
- The Kalibr suite was designed to compare favorably with Washington’s prolific but aging Tomahawk cruise missiles. Whereas the original Kalibr 3M14 traded performance blows with the Tomahawk’s Block IV revision in what amounts to an approximate draw tilted slightly in Kalibr’s favor, Kalibr-M drastically outranges its US counterpart at 4,500 against 1,700 kilometers.
The most significant advantage of the 3M14T and its family is that they can be fired from a wider variety of smaller ships than the American ones that usually carry the Tomahawk, making it easier to deploy. It is also being developed to fire from fixed land bases, vehicles, and aircraft.Kalibr may not have some of the advanced loitering and interactive data link capabilities of the current Tomahawk, but that might well make it cheaper to mass-produce (in addition to parts commonality with family variants).
Chapters:
00:00 Introducing
03:56 Kalibr Cruise Missile
05:57 Tomahawk Cruise Missile
07:34 Tomahawk VS Kalibr
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @usmilitarypowerr
============================================
❤️ Subscribe Our Channel to Update More Videos everyday: / @usmilitarypowerr
❤️ Our Social Media:
☛ Pinterest: / usmilitarypower
❤️ US Military Power now available on Google Play Store: play.google.com/store/apps/de... - Věda a technologie
A Caliber missile tested by Algeria from a Kilo submarine hit a target with high accuracy, documented on video of its hitting the target
In general, all stands indicate that the range of the 'caliber' missile = 2500
kilometers! why are you deceiving the audience? you simply indicated the distance from the Caspian Sea to Syria is 1500 kilometers. and for that matter, in Russia, even under the USSR, there were long-range ship-based missiles, and it’s strange to hear that only the USA and Britain had this.
The one that is cheaper and easiest to produce is the most powerful
Thats nonsense. If you don't hit your target, your power level is 0. If your missile gets jammed, your power level is 0. If your missile gets intercepted, your power level is 0. And 0 is certainly not "the most powerfull".
Богатые и развитые страны могут позволить себе иметь дорогое оружие премиум класса.
@caimingliang yeah buddy
Kalibur is way better
@@IsaoTakahata578No one can afford expensive weapons.
until 2015, the fact that only the USA and Great Britain had long-range cruise missiles could only or from someone who does not know about Soviet and Russian weapons. In the USSR, cruise missiles appeared earlier than in the USA, and in the 70-80s the USSR already had cruise missiles with a range of 3000 and 5000 kilometers (December 9, 1976, the Decree of the Council of Ministers of the USSR was issued on the development of a universal strategic supersonic cruise missile 3M-25 "Meteorite" with a flight range of about 5000 kilometers. The rocket was supposed to become universal and get the ability to launch both from the sea - "Meteorit-M", and from aviation - "Meteorite-A" carriers. The rocket exists) , the caliber also did not appear in the 2000s, its ancestors are different modifications of the calibers of the 70-80s with a range of 3000 kilometers one of his ancestors is a unique ancestor - the S-10 Granat missile system with a long-range cruise missile KS-122 (3M10) equipped with a nuclear warhead. with a range of 2500 kilometers.
The missiles of the Caliber family were created on the basis of two projects: the 3M10 strategic nuclear cruise missile with a combat radius of 2500 km developed during the period from 1975 to 1984 at the Novator Design Bureau and the competition of anti-ship missiles Alfa (R&D "Turquoise").
Initially, only the Yakhont supersonic anti-ship missile took part in the Biryuza R&D competition, but its development was delayed, and the rocket came out expensive. At the same time, the 3M10 project had problems due to the planned Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty. And the Novator Design Bureau, on its own initiative, in 1986, a non-nuclear version of the naval version of the KS-122 missile was proposed for competition, however, it did not suit the selection committee because of the subsonic attack speed. Work continued, and in 1990 a finished version appeared with a supersonic finish booster to overcome enemy defense systems. However, the beginning of the collapse of the USSR suspended the introduction of this product.
Also, in parallel, the development of an anti-submarine complex based on the KS-122 was carried out to replace the bulky and obsolete Vodopad and Rastrub-B complexes. The first version of the rocket in this direction was presented in 1997.
The Kalibr family rockets were first presented to the general public at MAKS-93.
The Russian Navy is armed with the Kalibr missile system. According to open sources, the maximum firing range of the 3M14 cruise missile from the composition of this complex, flying at subsonic speed, reaches about 2 thousand km. A variant of the Caliber-NK complex has been developed for surface ships, and the Caliber-PL complex has been developed for submarines. In particular, Russian frigates of project 22350, corvettes of project 21631 Buyan-M, multi-purpose nuclear submarines of project 885 Yasen, non-nuclear submarines of projects 877 and 636.3, and other ships are armed with Caliber.
On January 8, 2018, there were reports in the media about the start of work on the development of a modified version of the Caliber-M missile. According to a source, “The latest high-precision ship-based Caliber-M cruise missile with a maximum firing range of more than 4,500 km is being developed for the Navy.
( Today Caliber is much better than Tamogawk.Therefore, autumn is stupid to believe that Russia does not have long-range missiles until 2015. Russia has cruise missiles with a range of 5,500 kilometers, both sea and air based. Various modifications of Caliber also have a range of 300 to 4500 kilometers.
Therefore, your data on the range of 1500 kilometers is not correct. the maximum range of one of the modifications is 4500 kilometers, the range of calibers used in Syria is 2500 kilometers.
Today in Ukraine, various export-type modifications are used, cheap up to 300 kilometers and more expensive up to 2500, the same as in Syria, as well as Iskander strategic missiles up to 550 kilometers (cruised and ballistic), and Onyxes with a range of 550 kilometers as well, and also air-based
Yeah you don't know anything about the USSR.
Now from 2023, Australia, a third country will have 220+ latest gen Tomahawk cruise missiles as part of the AUZUS agreement.
Yes but cnn didn’t talk about that, but they did about calibr that’s why we all know about it😉
Yeah like the Su-57 and the T-14, all superior weapons right? Dear comrade, russian forces and weapons are joke 😂😂😂
@@jha77jha77 You're a fool . Su57 showed well in a real situation, unlike the Western f22, which did not participate in one conflict because it was crap and f35, which has more than 700 malfunctions so far🤣🤣🤣
And by the way, the su 57 is mass-produced. as for the T14, there is no need for it, with the assumption that the T90 is the best tank of competitors that has no competitors in the west, while it is cheaper than any
You perfectly explain and judge without bias, you are the first American person I came across with this quality....keep it up
He leaves it for you to make the decision. And to me, it is obvious that the tomahawk is better. It is more connected, has loitering capabilities, and is less susceptible to countermeasures.
Agree. Americans are VERY biased and rarely see longer than their own noses.
@@jiminauburn5073 ask ukrainians
@@Krkovic100 Ukrainians have not been hit by Tomahawks. They have nothing to compare the Kalibr missiles to. Wouldn't you think if they both have about the same accuracy, the same range, the same payload, that the one that is harder to jam, that can have its target changed in flight, that is more connected, and can loiter, would be the superior one?
@@PpAirO5 In fact, the Russians and most of the world are biased and vindictive to the American people, which is why they don't like anyone in America.
Обзор достоин уважения за честность и непредвзятый взгляд на обе ракеты. Действительно пока сложно сказать какая из них лучше, но, в любом случае, отсутствие утверждений в стиле "это лучше, просто потому, что это наше" добавляет симпатии автору.
Ещё томагавк никогда не работал в условиях серьезного противодействия современных пво.
@@kto_to_tam911 Работал
@@Lenz.93 Пример
Украина вернется в границьі 91го года, нравится єто вам, русакам, или нет.
@@TonsOFDamage хорошо, только начало 91-го 😁
En ucrania los kalibr han entrado impunemente venciendo a lo mejor de los sistemas de detección e interceptación de la otan. En cambio, los Tomahawk no han Sido probados contra ejércitos verdaderos, con sistemas y armamentos modernos
Как это не испытывались, конфликт буря в пустыне 1991 года именно тогда американские крылатые ракеты отлично себя зарекомендовали. Российский калибр это всего лишь копия американского "томагавка", причем плохая копия.
Томагавки были выпущены по сирии 60 шт. долетели только 12шт.
@@planetaplan440 ты сам считал.
@@alekxalekxandrow3451
Википедию почитай. Удар коалиции по сирии 2018г.
Пишут с томагавками и ракетами воздушного базирования было запущено 105 ракет.
105 ракет по центру киеву, что бы там было?
It's the one that costs less and does 90 percent of the work. Just facts of life. Deal with it.
How can it be better when it doesn't do 100% of the job and can be easily jammed? You are the one who doesn't want to deal with reality. You are coping, hard!
Muy bonito el Barquito...una joya de ingeniería...pero cuando se ponga "gordo el asunto" entre Yankees y el Oso Siberiano,Pero será "PAN COMIDO ", Para los misiles Iskander,Khinzal, Ónix,S-350, o los misiles Ipersonicos Kalibr ...Son una chulada tecnológica
Somewhat a balanced comparison from an american channel. Bravo!
While balancing is pretty good but not good enough because the truth is way more important. God told me that Russian missiles (both offense and defense system) are far more advanced. If the war to break out between these two nations (NATO included) the U.S. stands no chance against Russia, both conventional and nuclear.. God also told me that Russia, North Korea, and Iran have been reserved and preserved for a thousand years to punish America and her western allies that follow the same sinful lifestyle.. The only way to calm Russia and her allies down is for the public to repent.
@@rockefelleragent1357 🤣🤣🤣
God joking
@@rockefelleragent1357put the pipe down bucko Russia can’t even defeat Ukraine 🇺🇦 a country 1/4 it’s size 🤡
У ХОХЛОВ САМЫЕ ЛУЧШИЕ РАКЕТЫ ЗИПУН ИЗ С 200 ПЕРЕДЕЛАНЫ
@@rockefelleragent1357 You are nuts. Get help.
power is nothing without precision.
для ядерной боеголовки не так важно
@@v0vab0b Так же, как Россия не смеет стрелять, потому что знает, что ее ждет.
@@chariesbergero9662 "не смеет стрелять" - с каких пор попрошайки рассказываю кто что смеет?) Твой обкеканый блок, куда вы так стремитесь, спрашивает разрешение постоянно
@@chariesbergero9662 u.p.d хохла с далека видно
@@chariesbergero9662 трусики уже раздали кружевные или пока нет?))
Калибр это целое семейство крылатых ракет с разными характеристиками.
nice video 👍
Thank you 👍
what matters to me is accuracy and its ability to hit the target while avoiding counter measures in high percentage.
at syria from 20 tomahowk 18 missed the traget because russian jammers and teh last two destroyed by s300. just outdated.
Agree.
@@makoado6010 source?
@@bukanpahlawan902 links removed by youtube... so goole it
@@makoado6010 keyword?
In its short 239-year history, the U.S. has unleashed 209 wars and armed conflicts.
Umm, something an imbecile would say?
I like the way you explain good job bra
America at least has something to compare with Kalibre but I wonder if they have any to compare to Kinzhal, zircon or avangard all deployed and some used.
Yes Aim 183 Hypersonic missile aircraft
@@deanbrown2061 only that? plus,it still on testing phase and by the time that its handed on the US military, Russia will develop more powerful ones.
Why is the war not over then? Russia is trash. Deal with it.
@Tyson S that's because we haven't given them the weapons they really need. we're trying to stop this thing and become a stalemate like North and South Korea.
Raytheon Technologies has also successfully test-fired a hypersonic missile. With our defense budget, it won't be long before we overtake them.
En el último ataque masivo con misiles tomahawks que hizo EE UU contra Siria, la defensa electrónica suministrada por Rusia provocó que estos misiles cayeran como moscas sobre las arenas sirias como moscas inermes.....ya Rusia ni los recogía para estudiarlos....
Там особо уже изучать нечего, интерес представляют последние модификации томагавков. Томагавки это старые ракеты, против современных средств противодействия РЭБ и ПВО они бесполезны.
Puerto Rico te lo confirmó,!!!!!!
😂
The one that is actually built and in great supply!
According to RUSI in three month the russian has fired more cruise missles than the US produced tomahawks for over 10 Years.
I remember how Russia planned to take Ukraine in a matter of 3 days to a maximum of 3 weeks.
@@walterrivera2183 that was the claim of the West russia dient say that because They know that the Ukraine has the strongest Arms in Europe.They has More Field Artillerie than the US.
@@walterrivera2183 That's your foolish CIA's claim 😂🤣🤣
@@walterrivera2183 ข่าวที่เขียนมาจากไหน555 เดินทางยังไม่ได้เลย555ขำๆๆ
@@walterrivera2183 that was all bs coming from US dod and the grandpas who are hosted in media stations as russian experts
Quem fabrica o excelente S-400, fabrica também o ótimo Kalibr.
It doesn't matter who make them, they're trash compared to some others
Да русские ракеты первые полетели в космос и сейчас они лучшие
@@inaina3674 a Rússia detém o domínio completo na tecnologia dos mísseis.
Durante muito tempo, o único meio de se chegar a Estação Espacial Internacional, era através da nave russa
@Helton there's a big difference between missile dominance and being the only one manufacturing rocket engines. For whatever reasons our governmental entities preferred to farm out the manufacturing of the rocket engines to Russia. You're kidding yourself if you really think it's because that was beyond our engineering capability.
It was a favor to the Russian aerospace tech sector, and it was convenient for the US.
Musk looked over the numbers and saw that Russia was overcharging by a considerable amount for it's 1980's era rocket engine designs read: obsolete/inefficient. The Russian engines were disposable for a reason.
Thus he was able to introduce a modern state of the art engine design utilizing newer fuels in a far more efficient and durable design hence being reusable several times over.
The guidance and navigation of the US systems are far superior to anything that the Russian Federation can currently manufacture. You won't find Russian made chipsets and motherboards in any US weapon system. Lol, if only there were reliable Russian made chipsets and motherboards so that the Russian systems didn't have to resort to hijacking American chipsets and to further repurpose such in order to fit their needs.
Sadly this results in very inefficient electronic items that do not perform as reliably or as consistently as purpose built chipsets and boards. Which none of Russia's current modernized weapon systems have.
The best of Russia's weapons ALL have a little bit of American know how in them in order for them to even work.
@@robertzendejas8349 no seu texto você fala que os motores de foguetes russos são ultrapassados e obsoletos, fala também que os chips, placas-mães, sistemas de navegação e orientações não são confiáveis, mas não se esqueça que os EUA e a Europa Ocidental estão anos luz atrás dos russos em relação a tecnologia dos mísseis hipersonicos, aliás, EUA e a Otan estão sob ameaça direta contra tal arma russa, que até o presente momento, não existe defesa antiaérea para abatê-lo. Se você fala que os EUA são tão superiores assim, porque ainda não conseguiram desenvolver um missel hipersonico totalmente operacional?
to be fair next should be comparing RK55/SS-N-21 to harpoon.
We know what the US can do but we don't know what Russia can do. The best option is to avoid things that trigger war
И че может сделать США рабомбить очередную ближневосточную страну, воевать против пастухов и коз?
Tomahawk บินได้ไม่เท่า Kalibre ทั้งระยะทางและความเร็ว เอามาเปรียบกันคงสู้กันไม่ได้มั้ง
Tomahawk have more speed and range man...
Calibers even flew from the territory of Russia to Syria the destruction of ISIS
US has tomahawk and how many different type of cruise missiles Russia got ? Kinda answers that dilemma. And if you think Russia running out then look what they fired in Ukraine so far and Vostok last month ( biggest military exercises seen since ww2) which fires Armageddon in barrages .
Oh dear, another total mudflap.
Sorry Russian bot, your terrible grammar makes no sense , I know all you Russians have little man syndrome
@@TKUA11 you know exactly what I put and am British as far back the crusades, nice try though. Dunno why you think am little either ? Ha ha ha . You bitch about my grammar and yours is probably worse than mine
@@gregchijoff9959 And idiots will never run out of horseshit to talk...
И сколько в Сирии ушло
Kalibr Missile series are promising and more cheaper, more range....
While Tomahawk Missile is old and too expensive, lower range and more susceptible to electronic warfare jamming that it was reported in their Syrian campaign while their bombarding ISIS and Assad's bases simultaneously that they must cross the radar defense of Russian bases in Syria.... Only a handful of block 4 Tomahawk Cruise missiles are capable of the current modern warfare.... If block 5 is successful they must add a bit more range to have a comparable range against old Kalibr Cruise missiles of Russia that are 4k+ km range
Калибр быстрей! Дальность полета выше! Ну и самое главное-мощней
@@Headhear Десять штук в мес. это тираж достаточны в военное время ? Да и одна ракета , будь она и лучшая не решает исход войны. Войну побеждает армия со всем комплексом вооружения и выучки.
Garbage. With 2300+ combat firings, no Tomahawk was ever shot down.... or jammed. Oh, jamming is pretty much a BS story made up by vodka swilling katsaps to make the fan boys moist.
Considering the fail rate of Kalibr in Ukraine I would say that the Tomahawk is better in EW protected areas. The range for Kalibr is unknown but iit is very hard to believe that the Kalibr-M will have that long of a range. For the other Kalibr variants the Tomahawks have advantage in range
@@napobg6842 In any case, Russia is lagging behind in military developments. If they have done anything similar to Tomogawk, they are lagging behind in dozens of other areas. One missile, even the best one, does not decide the outcome of the war.
You guys are good.
Хорошо поставлен голос. Много нового узнал о крылатых ракетах. Спасибо.)
I'm going to say that both systems are pretty good!
God told me that Russian Kalibr missiles are far more capable and is superior to the U.S. Tomahawk missiles. That was one of the reasons how Russia saved Syria so quickly from being taken over by the U.S.
Both systems are pretty catastrophic! There, I corrected this for you 🤗
No more discussion Only Iranian missiles and then nothing,😂
В СИРИИ ТАМОГАВКИ ОБО СЬ
kalibr missile for me!
a superior missile platform, all variants and all platform carriers
Yes, the Kalibr missile right for you. To your house 👋
Товарищи, вы перезаписали видио?
У вас 2 года назад выходил этот материал
Each uses between 100 to 120 troy ounces in there construction, so where do you think the price of Silver is going
I am Super afraid and shock of both US and Russia Tomahawk and Kalibr cruise missiles.
Both are very good....first strike capability is what counts.......
As an inhabitant of city that was recently shelled by rockets, it's better to say that both are VERY BAD. The same about people who launch them
Soon live to know
We'll find out soon 😉
У калибра в отличие от томагавка есть системы противодействия перехвату и несколько модификации с различными ттх. Калибр может изменять цели на лету, лететь по сложной траектории и изменять ее. В СССР тоже были крылатые ракеты.
Also much better range than tomahawk.. big difference
@@jolivera8451 The greater range of certain kalibr variants is achieved by doubling the size and weight of this particular missile variant. It’s essentially a new missile and no genius achievement.
@@williamzk9083 regardless it seriously out ranges ours, and that size and weight u mentioned really makes for a way bigger kaboom👌🏼 oh and way cheaper witch will obviously enable Russia to mass produce🤷🏻♂️
And has the downing rate of 80+%. That's quite useless.
@@madcalm2024 according to whom? Useless?
I find both very similar and precise
you dont even know what your on about!! YOU NEED TO SIT DOWN THE BIG BOYS ARE HERE NOW......ppppfffTTT
Watch out the Russian bots will get triggered
Up to date version is kalibr-m.
il y'a plusieurs modèles des deux. et sont toujours on amélioration
We're gonna find out
kalibr missiles still can destroy his target even that the enemy have lot of SAM coverage like (s300 , buk m1, strela, IRIS-T, NASAMS ,hawk, gipard, .....)
nice
Kalibr the best
Which is more ACCURATE ?
Accuracy, accuracy, accuracy. If the missile does not hit's its target, how much cheaper it is exponentially goes up if it takes so many more to hopefully hit's intended target. Range? If it can't hit 600km, how does it expect to hit it's fantasy range of 4000km plus? Where are those advanced chips coming from and in what numbers can the Kalibr be launched at. If it can't find it's target, how will it compensate? Someone's arm sales are doing very very badly. The Kalibr can be launched from so many different platforms, each one has that one little consistent problem , if you can't see your target, how are you hoping to ever hit it? Good luck on those arm sales.
Ты должен и дальше продолжать в это верить. Нам так нужно.
AA gunners were making bets in Yugoslavia, who's gonna down more Tomahawk, they used 12.7 quad guns from WW2, easily shooting down slow large targets!
Тоже обожаю Рен ТВ
Если честно, я удивлён довольно непредвзятому обзору со стороны Американского канала.
Это же не российский канал, где всегда хвалят свое и хают других, называя свое вооружение "аналогов нет"
@FM - Free Music - Royalty Free Trap после того как пару раз прилетели кинжалы а у них даже сирена не сработала, уже не говорят.
I'm sure we'll all find out very soon!
Дело не в мощности, в точности ,защите от помех,количестве,качестве,надежности,дальности стрельбы и себестоимости.АК-47 тому пример! ЯО только можно сравнивать по мощности!Всем мира и добра!
любите вы русские сея смерть и разрушения в оконцовке желать добра и мира, при этом обращаясь на Вы, и к богу вы обращаетесь с заглавной буквы лицемеры . А до этого вылазиите со своей русской народной сказкой "мы за мир и дружбу между народами" и присказками "мы люди маленькие, не примешивайте всюду политику". Где вы живете? Сейчас везде политика. И ваша верхушка устроила войну при вашей полной поддержке и по Оруеллу спрятались за новоязом - СВО, хлопки, задымления. Желаю вам всего этого
@@qazanbasik5447 это тебе к США.Они во всем мире сеют хаос, устраивают революции и войны по всему миру!
Калибр как Месси- ему больше нечего доказывать
Скорее, ГАМНЕССИ)))
Хуй..ня все эти калибры, по Украине уже их столько выпустили, а толку ноль, это они могут только с полуплеменными государствами себя так смело вести.
@@user-pj8dq8um1p так точно, при подлете ракеты у встречающих откладывается кал
hello beautiful
Why don't you have Persian subtitles?
Thank You
I don't know anything about either these missiles but I would be willing to bet that the Russian one is cheaper to manufacture and the American one actually works.
А как же в Алеппо, из 64 томагавков долетели только 12, или это другое?
S400 KALIBER 🥰
S400 is not Kalibr. S400 is an air defense system
You missed important point- Kalibr have jamming system embedded and can destroy air defense missile during flight, particularly it can send self destruction signals to S300 missiles
yes and it always landed to the residential building of the civilian population in Ukraine instead of the military camp. good accuracy damaging non combatance
@@ttkitah9627 incredulous even the rats know what happened in the exploded buildings
@@wuillincaesa3842 correctly and some landed to open area some in play ground while children are playing it is so much precised target, the grass are so scared
@@ttkitah9627 🤣🤣🤣😁😅😅
@@ttkitah9627 😅😅😁😁🤣🤣
Kalliber is a copy of the Tomahawk missile which came into play in the early 1980s!!
Oh, they copied a Tomahawk?
what about the h-22 cruise missile, which appeared in 1968
@@frfr714 Kh-22 is not a cruise missle
@@napobg6842 why not
@@frfr714 More modern versions might be but the older are not as they are not maneuverable
La fábrica de Rusia en su mayoría son Públicas y eso es una gran ventaja porque ellos fabrican a precios de costo de producción y USA sus empresas venden para obtener gran utilidad económica,eso equivale a que USA tenga en stock menor cantidad que Rusia. Ambos países Tienen armas muy parecidas en eficiencia pero no en precios.
Все наоборот)
Por eso es la dudosa calidad del actual arsenal Ruso pues en si son semi publicas manejada por magnates socio del del mismo gobierno en el cual este lo escoge a dedo y que se dice que hay mucha corrupcion, no hay competencia como tal, en cambio los Gringos es todo lo contrario al ser privadas hay mucha competencia para escoger el mejor producto y garantiza mas la calidad. la competencia es la clave.
@@wilmernino1807 in the Soviet Union there was no competition anywhere at all, and in terms of civilian technology, the Soviet Union was far behind its Western "partners", but not in terms of weapons and missiles. As for corruption, it is always and everywhere, another question is how much it is controlled by the state. if you are engaged in corruption in weapons development in Russia, you are either very stupid or very brave. any weapon developments such as missiles, aircraft, tanks, any serious military equipment are under control as much as possible. they are very closely monitored, first of all, Putin himself controls everything
@@ingspektr6511 source: Believe me bro 👍🏻
😂🤣😂🤣🤡🤡
Kalibar
Tomahawk I knew as child I am 50
It depends on which one is coming at you.
from a channel named "US military power" don't expect to get a truthful comparison
It’s hilarious eh, “kalibra has triple the range”, but fails lol😂 not biased at all😂
The most powerful is the one ho reach his target.
Billion divided by Million Calculator
Octillion, 27. Nonillion, 30. Decillion, 33. Undecillion, 36. Duodecillion, 39. Tredecillion, 42. Quatttuor-decillion, 45. Quindecillion
Kalibre for the Win
Bigger FASTER Longerange.
If you're on the wrong end of either of them, it's a bad day!
Después de lo visto últimamente en la guerra de Ucrania no hay posibilidad de comparación ya que los misiles Rusos están muy por encima en tecnología. También vimos fracasar a los Tomahawk en Siria donde la mayoría fueron inutilizados por Rusia. Por no hablar de las capacidades hipersonicas de Rusia, donde Estados Unidos no solo se quedó atras, sino que no dispone de esa tecnología y de las armas hipersonicas que ya tiene Rusia, China o incluso Irán. Basar el desarrollo militar en tener bases por todo el planeta, en los obsoletos portaviones, o en el fallido F35 ha echo retrasar a Estados Unidos, gastar todos sus recursos al basarse su poderío en armas obsoletas como los mencionados portaaviones, los sistemas patriot que también fracasaron en Ucrania ante los misiles hipersonicos rusos kinzal, o los también obsoletos Tomahawk, ha echo que solo puedan ser efectivos contra Naciones debiles o indefensas. Contra potencias como Rusia ya hemos comprobado que están bastante atrás
Самая мощная "Буревестник", с не ограниченной дальностью и ядерной боеголовкой.
X-22(Kh-22) destroyed the Patriot air defense system! Against the X-47 M2 (Kh-47 M2), this complex is generally powerless, the Patriot air defense system would not even be able to produce one shot if it were the target!
What ever makes you feel better 😂
Déjate de darle duro al alcohol,!!
As they say imitation is the highest form of complement
Yes. Russia is great imitator
А как же советский як-141 и скопированный с него ф-35? Или это другое?
как тут сравнишь то. нету точных данных ни по одному из объектов сравнения.
Stop showing flames coming out of the tail during the cruise phase. Jet engines not rockets.
It's the boost phase to get them up to speed so they can fly, like a runway for an aircraft.
yep! if you want to gaurantee the tomahawk hits its target then just set up a wedding there and bingo it will always hit with pin point accuracy...
,,How about the Trident ICBM.?
Question for Americans, why USA attacked former Yugoslawia???
I also ask myself same question every day.
both are the same.. the russian one is $1 MM and the US one is $20 MM per pop.
So buying 20 kalibr is better than buying a tomahawk
@@kamalchandramoney3541 cheaper and as effective
They are not the same, listen to their capabilities.
Nope! The latest block 5 Tomahawk costs 2m not 20!
@@napobg6842 Where did you see any new weapon systems ever gotten cheaper. Never happens
Kalibr es mejor..de entrada ya es 200km/h más rápido
Doesn't matter how fast it goes, it rarely hits its target. The only sure thing about a kalibr is that it will hit the ground at some time.
És Nabo.
Tomahawk kill civilians : no investigation required
We are back to the fog of war eating us all .
GPS guidance on Kalibr? Thought Russians are using Glonass
They refuse to use it even on their own jets
El Stromwreaker sin duda
Per scoprire qual è il migliore bisognerebbe provarli insieme.. Aspettate solo che mi sposto in Argentina 😊
Над атаками томогавков в Сирии ржал весь мир. Там они во всей "красе" предстали.
Kaliber is better than cruise missile
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ambos misiles son precisos y efectivos.
Неважно какая из них на первом месте, какая на втором, любая прилетит будет смерть...
can you make music louder? cant hear it
Tomahawks fly at somewhat lower altitudes which gives them better survivability
Survivability is 100% so far, cant say much for the joke called kalibr...
@@TrevorSachko the Syrians say otherwise
Показатель обстрел Дамаска тамогавками, когда из 120 тамогавков долетел 2, а в Киев из 30 долетает 25калибров, и "патриот" не очень помог, а точнее уже 2 комплекс уничтожили
Syrian lies about everything
many of them have been shot down over Yugoslavia back in the late 90s. Some even missed the country and hit the country next door landed on some empty houses.. @@TrevorSachko
Tomahawk -- ecm jamming, nap of earth, and loitering outclass Kalibr 10-1. Although, since Russian could care less how accurate their missiles are it's a draw, a sad comparison.
Buahaha.. clown. Tomahawk indeed missed to destroy Syrian military airforce objects long time ago. Tomahawk is not so accurate, Kalibr can reach thousand kilometers to the target precisely.
Keep dreaming, kid.
well how accurate were the over 100 tomahawks missiles fired in syria which were supposed to saturate a single building...??the place had no crater, so I would imagine what happened to the other missiles
@@briant5685 😆
@@briant5685 🤣
You have data of Russian Earth mapping? Share with us.
Kaliber does not need ECM jamming, lol
Caliber is the best cruise missile
Дерьмо расиянское
For killing civilians
Please,Show the letters for public. For some people.
it's on the best battleplan wins
my vote goes to KALIBR since looking at the video accuracy is the same on both platforms but range and speed of KALIBR is far better then TOMAHAWK plus probably cheaper to produce and it could be launched from variety of vessels.
acctually Russia can not build more Kalibers as most technologie came from west, Many of high tech weopons running low due to not able get needed tech, You can not make a kaliber with wasmachine processors. This was a big mistake using Forien components
@@Noodleanrgry
hahahahahahahaha
ahh Westerners
They are like children. Believe in anything their media represent them!
@@Noodleanrgry калибры ещё в марте 2022 года закончились же)))
@@ncc1701218 no that are russian who believe anything media tells them? and i am not even western
@@Noodleanrgry
Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Syria, Serbia, Yemen, Palestine...
No response! Blindness!
Coup in Ukraine. Nothing.
Massacre in Odesa. Nothing.
The bombing of Donbas and the tens of thousands killed civilians. Nothing.
They banned the Russian language. Guess what happened?! Nothing.
No coverage in Western media!
One provocation after another.
As armas Russas sempre foram melhores e mais eficientes e eficazes.
Keep dreaming. Is that why they can’t take over a smaller country like Ukraine when they even have more machines to fight with?
💯%
Tão eficiente que na segunda guerra teve que depender da ajuda e das armas americanas pra vencer os alemães.
@@sandrosqn Yeah also write that it was the Americans who invented the T 34 and Katyusha
@@sandrosqn сказал итальянец😆🤣
Кроме качества ракеты важно еще и возможность ее массового производства. И это есть главная проблема ВПК РФ.
Gde problema?
@@gde-to-kogda-to6130 В Путинской власти.
Uno es guiado por Gps el otro por Glonass..
น่าจะพอๆกัน
Appreciate this point. America has had missiles for years. But only Russia struck the terrorists. That's all there is to know about the Western world.
Rusia have hipersonics zircón
Rusia has big propaganda
@@animals7473 😂😂😂 хохли педики
Tomahak has Advance can be lunch from Many directions and from AIR water. Ground
No, Tomahawk are launched from vertical launchsystems on navy ships and from submarines. So does the Kaliber aswell.
The american airlaunch cruise missile variant is the AGM-129 and the russian variant are the Kh series
Knowing Russia's track record of boasting about their weaponry and reality proven to be completely different I would take Tomahawk Block V any day of the week.
😂
Россия никогда не хвастает своим вооружением. Она его применяет и весь мир видит это. Лучшая реклама.
El que alcance el objetivo preciso
Kalibr has shown his strength in Ukraine, they completely destroyed Ukrainian infrastructures for months now
ukrain destroyed them with patriot
Yea, great succsess for russia 😅
@@simonsymo5361 Yes we have seen the video where Patriots shell out 30 missiles that's around $150 million and yet gets destroyed. They first banned Russian media from CZcams and then you can only rely on one sided information which is biased.
@@simonsymo5361 чугунная авиабомба времен Второй Мировой войны не является крылатой ракетой «Калибр». Украинская сторона не предъявила ни одного доказательства перехвата Калибра
Tomhawk is the real deal accuracy n changing the course of direction of the target,heat seaker n it can maintain moving over head until u get the choice of hit