US Billions $ FLYING Aircraft Carrier Is Finally Ready For Action
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 08. 2022
- US Billions $ FLYING Aircraft Carrier Is Finally Ready For Action
The US Navy is about to become the US Air Force. Aircraft carriers are about to become aircraft. Like the aircraft that take off from them, these aircraft carriers would take off to the skies as opposed to the seas - but for the same reason - to project the might of the US Navy in the brightest colors. Uncommon as the concept of a flying aircraft carrier is, it isn’t a new project and has actually been around since the times of the World Wars. And now, thanks to the advent of technology, they have received renewed attention and the US is once again aiming for revolutionary flying carriers.
We are closer to having a human step foot on Mars than we are to having a flying aircraft carrier.
Jim Mulholland For the sake of the world, I pray so!
Yea unless the alledged Solar Warden / Radiant Guardian projects "discovered" by Gary McKinnon are just the deep black off chutes of Thomas Townsend Brown's Project Winterhaven / Project Montgolfier!
Right on point. This would be the biggest white elephant project in the world.
We have to land on the moon first before we can even think about Mars next 🤣
Love ❤️ USA 🇺🇸
The U.S.S. Gerald Ford weighs about 90,000 tons. That's over 180 million pounds. The amount of energy needed to lift that much weight would be mind boggling. Short of strapping a few Saturn 5 rockets to each side, it's a safe bet that the technology to pull this off won't exist for at least another century or two.
Nuclear power definitely can or nuclear fusion power definitely can so don’t say nothing can
You be surprised what the black opps government programs can do
Fusion its already there like ngad
@@Fuunyrob the weight of an aircraft carrier, the weight of the aircraft, fuel for the aircraft, the crew, food for the crew. The reactor, the water to cool the reactor. You're not looking at the weight of an aircraft carrier, you're looking at possibly the weight of two to three aircraft carriers right there. Impossible.
Also you need to make it so that it won't get shot down by a meager 10mil dollar missile from the sky. Would be a neck breaking story if a billion dollar airfleet gets shot down in the warfield
A totally original Idea thats 100% not stolen from marvel💯💯💯💯
Civilians: you guys are spending to much money on NASA The US Navy: oh really? The government:
If russians made flying aircraft carriors that held 4 fighters to 8 in world war 2 your telling me we cant do the same with more fighters? At least 12 f22s
Somebody is on an AVENGERS quest for flying carriers.
"EXACTLY "!!!
They've been working on them
Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow are more like it.
@@wickwire9560 lyl
That would be me and I figured it out. It will be featured in some of my future content. (And yes, I was inspired my Avengers Assemble.) I can prove it, too. Just drop me a line and I'll send you a free copy of CODE NAME: Monte Rico, where I invented five new weapons.
I especially like _“this is possible, because technology.”_ Phew! I’m super glad you cleared that up for us!!
*Me:* _“How does it work?”_
*You:* _“I just did a technology!”_
The landing for this aircraft on sea what a great place on Earth.
The reasons most countries don't invest in aircraft carriers is that they are a bigger target. There are cold launch hypersonic missiles that can blow any aircraft carrier out of the water before any radar can detect it in time. Unmanned drones that can be programmed to attack a ship in swarms overwhelming the ship's defensive capabilities. The bigger the object the bigger the target.
agreed
Most common sense comment on this thread.
Nothing like a 50 Billion Dollar Pinata
It's main purpose is exactly what it's name is. Aircraft carrier. The benefit to transport fighter jets to far off places while at the same time carry large missiles and nuclear warheads. Enable the US to be in direct strike distance to any country in the world
@@underconstruction778 Great answer..Yet it's still a big target considering the new type of weapons available today by enemies.
THE MAIN CONCERN IS AVOIDING FLYING COWS!
And/or pigs
This FLYING Aircraft Carrier is transformable, and if transformed, it will become a giant robot, I'm sure.
🇪🇺🇬🇷👋
they could build
a small carrier
.1 big plane
carrying
1 small fighter jet
like space shuttle plane
it's the only logical solution
1 big plane
carrying a fighter jet
close to battle
and then leave it to fly
to save fuel
🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷👋🙏🙏🏴☮☮☮🇺🇦🇷🇺🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👑👋🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🏴🏴🏴🏴
Yeah! One huge "Mother goose."☺️👍✌️🇬🇧
Here come Robojox
I immediately thought "Super Dimensional Fortress Macross" when I read that comment
Optimus Crime
World most powerful in technologybig up USA.
This aircraft was introduced in the movie, "The Titans" that had bays for jets and the large winged static Osprey
.
If they can add a sub surface platform for jets to take off towards the front of the carrier, while on the deck, the jets take off to the left. That should double the amount of planes that could take off, twice as fast.
The problem of the number of Aircraft on a Carrier is not how many , but of the storage of them and maintenance. That's the problem for most, the Ford Class can probably carry more but if the hanger is full can maybe carry more on deck like some did in WW2 like when USS Hornet attacked Japan on the Jimmy Doolittle B-25 raid but had USS Enterprise as escorting it then.
And remove all plane storage and repair stations. Also this is just clickbait not real at all.
Story that touches the heart...USA Aircraft carrier! Uuunn!
Because that and missile submarines are the heart of the USA military might
Wow the navy have been busy producing powerful and amazing aircraft and technology continuesly just like star trek is also navy and a wave of our future so to everyone "Live Long And Prosper"
Bruh , nice editing, combination of avenger movie scene and real time aircraft takeoff scene😅
Well done, let them fly as many as possible
Just simply implausible... there's no way that could either exist let alone fly ... hover or move ...
Don't say impossible. You've seen what human kind have done already
@@ShadowWolf-om4ub It definetely isn't impossible, but It isn't happening any time closer than like 70 years.
@@Deran087 its alright. I'll cryo myself until then
A guy told me today that he saw this fly over his home and the sky went black. It flew over the Midwest. If this thing is real, it's crazy.
Yeah... this isn't going to happen, unless there is some serious security and safety measures added to it. Perhaps a photon shield, energy shield, or some extremely prcise and fast anti missile technology.
If one engine is taken out, or just some portion of power is reduced, the entire "flying aircraft carrier" would fall out of the sky and be completely destroyed.
This is pie in the sky at best, and a horrible idea at worst.
Yeah - Its just staggering how many clowns peddling this sort of sci-fi bullshite there are on CZcams.
Worse is the fact there are literally millions of people who believe this crap is real.
Millions claim the moon missions were faked and then millions turn around and believe this crap. Its enough to make you wonder if oxygen is actually a hallucinogenic.
Nope, it's easier to hide in the sky than land or water. Water is so dangerous, their is a lot of enemy to comprehend. With projectiles going down, enemy will just need little energy to attack. While in air with US perfect stealth there only few attacks to watch out, but even an enemy would detect them they will need more energy to launch an attack. Since projectiles going up consumes a lot of energy. Example weapons like cannons, high caliber bullets, small missiles, and torpedoes can't reach them only fighter jets and medium to bigger size missiles can reach them. Besides since ancient times there is always so called higher ground advantages. The higher you are the more invincible you will for any attacks. Same as goes to the sky.
@@getssmith112 are you kidding me? I can't fly higher than 10k feet otherwise people on deck would need their own breathable oxygen while trying to maintain operations.
As far as stealth, there's no way you can make it hard to be noticable or targeted with everything going on and around it.
@@lharris428 have you ever heard of low orbit? And how does astronauts live in space for months?
@@getssmith112 you do know China has hypersonic missiles, right?
It will be awhile awesome idea but would take massive lift to pull this off
Not if they use the "technology" stored at Area 51.
The last thing we need to do is keep funding the military industrial complex.
The military all over the word plays a huge role in technological development
Yeah, but its a walled garden. For us much as they innovate they stifle our access to it.@@us3rG
While we all are being forced to drive electric cars 😂 nice
Yes. How fast could this fly...the size of it. How agile would it be...How could it avoid enemy fire ? Once downed think of all the personnel and equipment lost.....
Not to mention operating cost. Better just permanently hook up a fuel line to the ground and have it be stationary lol
For real 🤔
It will just engage it's cloaking device yo!🤣
Yes we can lift one of the heaviest man made objects using a few turbofans. Very believable.
Excellent thanks
Let me guy the guy who runs this ship will be code named”nick fury?”😂😂😂
The US had Zeppelin flying aircraft carriers, the Macon and Ackron, back in the 1930s - they even had vectored thrust,
they were lighter that air dirigibles... don't confuse yourself.
@@kevinkarbonik2928 They were lighter than air dirigibles that carried heavier-than-air aircraft and could launch an recapture them mid air - by any definition, aircraft carriers - and they also had vectored thrust capabilities - don't think there's anything confusing about it - Though on a technical point, all dirigibles fly a little heavier than air, and rely in part on dynamic lift, for the advisable expedient of a fail-safe return to land in the event of total engine and valving failure.
The Mothership 🚀
Make it usa i trust in you! Forza usa
I like the idea. I believe, it can be done.
I suggest to build top cover with semi synthetic glass that is bullet proof and designed aerodynamically for speed.
The Lockheed version of a nuclear powered flying aircraft carrier is so freakn cool but would be soooo expensive. To see it fly would be awe inspiring. Tactically, it would be a HUGE target as well. Yes it can deploy fighters to protect it but ground/sea based anti-air would be disastrous for it I think.
"""""Tactically, it would be a HUGE target as well."""
So is Moscow and Beijing 😂
Yup very awe-inspiring
핵에너지가 있어면 날으는 전함을 만들수 없는건가?
How the Avengers managed to move his aircarrier throught air without being hit by his foes rockets?
Not if it had radar similar to AWAC. Although it would not be maneuverable because of its size
The closest thing to a practical and useful flying aircraft carrier was a soviet concept design that used the ground effect to fly above water, this would allow the carrier to travel much faster than any conventional carrier and with minimal fuel cost, (+and it could fly over mines and torpedoes I think) while still being stable, safe and capable of carrying refueling and rearming state of the art full sized fighter jets + all the other crazy shit aircraft carriers do and more. & It could float
the idea of an actually flying carrier is ridiculous for multiple reasons:
Fuel use would be insane,
A flying aircraft carrier could easily be shot down by a missile, and unlike a normal carrier the crew wouldn't have time to abandon ship or salvage planes since they would be falling to earth
3mud air refueling does the same job for a much lower cost and the fuel tanker are much harder to hit, (the only thing it can't do is rearm planes)
4, if you went the route of a large plane carrying parasite fighters, they would be hopelessly out competed by a larger more advanced and more equipped fighter jet taking of from a runway,
5 today is all about stealth, missiles can be fired from over the horizon and can be almost undetectable, the best way not to get seen and shot down is not to be detected, good luck building a stealthy flying aircraft carrier,
And 5 an airship wouldn't be much faster than a ship
Still those ground effect vehicles failed too, aka the Caspian sea monster, if they stop moving they are just a sitting floating/duck, plus they only worked well in calm flat/water conditions, had a very limited range ... combat hovercrafts n landing vehicles also were just a passing fad though offered lower speed but more consistent performance plus could leave the water to some degree.
The Russians don't even have a working naval aircraft carrier
They could camouflage the carrier like they do in the avengers? Lol
@@ngriffo45 exactly largely because the Russians for all their faults which are many don't seek or want to leverage large parts of the world for geopolitical power ... they do want some of the vauge resource rich enthno-russian territories lost in the breakup/fall of the USSR/CCCP ... still they sit on a crazy amount of intercontinental nuclear weapons etc so they are sitting pretty ... while the USA rubs up against China in the South Chinese sea ... that's a long way from Neu York let alone Washington
Plus developing both a sea based carrier and the jets that can/could fly of it is expensive... very expensive ... especially in the age of the 6th generation combat fighters n bombers ... why bother when your own country spans 4 time zones ... fronts onto most other problem nations or allies ... aircraft carriers are expensive, air bases on your borders less so
i love this idea. if they can figure out viable ways of doing this, it will be a fantastic springboard for future space born carriers.
USS Macon was a flying aircraft carrier in the 1930s.
It only makes sense if you use anti gravity
Or use nuclear power
@@jasonrock5220 ⁰
@@jasonrock5220 half of the aircraft fleet of the U.S is nuclear power.
At that point it may as well be a space craft. You could not even walk on the platform without a oxygen mask. & You will need special clothing to stop you freezing at high altitude.
Stupid video, concept that will never work.
Roswell shit...right there....😊
This is absolutely absurd. I am all for RD projects with long term goals but we can barley lift one person for longer than 30 minutes with this type of tech. I do get content is hard to create and I appreciate your plight.
EURO. STUDIO. KHẮC. thêm 144 số không
They keep making these videos like this stuff is real and ready for action.
God bless America 🇺🇸
Cyclocopter tech should be used. I wouldn't say flying but the ability to jump, lets say 100 miles, would be impressive and tactically useful. Same consept as the space/ sea craft from the movie battle ship. Jump in, deploy aircraft, jump out. Then jump back in recover and jump out again.
Could you imagine the wind on that deck? Imagine a plane off vector getting sucked into one of those fan assemblies? Awesome carnage! Sailer would just be diced up and sprayed as fish food over the sea!
You could drop a jet tho
But at least they can spell 'sailor.'
Keep in mind that the Lockheed CL 1201 was conceptualized in the 1960's. Think about all the advancements in materials science, and computer modeling, that have occurred since that time. I speculate that it is very possible to build a viable, flying, aircraft carrier now.
I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for this one
"The carrier has arrived."
-Protoss Stargate
mất CÂY. CAO SU. VN. SCIENCE. WORLD. NGƯỜI VẬN CHUYÊN. Ô TÔ. WIFI. NUÔI
Power overwhelming!!!
😂😂😂 As long as the laws of physics apply, current tech is nowhere near making this a possibility.
Since when is anything from the the military current tech
Exactly why bother when you can have f35s n etc based on land in friendly nations ... the aircraft carrier concept died with 2nd world war ... when long range missiles nuclear n biological let alone intercontinental made that concept/doctrine redundant.
Haha the laws of physics always apply, just ask Elon Musk who pretends they don't ... but year in year out his products n promises either underperform, are years late and then garbage ... he can't even get his space trucks out, aka EV trucks n Utes with a ripped off design asthetic from Battlestar Galactica (OG) ... let alone his autonomous self driving software or the helper robot nobody wants in their house!
@@Gesso64 US military tech is always ahead of the field, but not far enough ahead for anything like this. Unless they've perfected some sort of antigravity tech, this isn't happening. More to the point, if they've perfected antigravity tech, this wouldn't be necessary. Lol
The true laws of physics are classified.
Extreamly impressive! Go USA!!!
Wow! Such technology.
Evolution of Fighter Jets😍czcams.com/video/mLUp5yFonOo/video.html
Would be cool to see but we’ll have to wait for perhaps a couple centuries to witness this
Ww3 won’t let that happen sorry
@@chazayah5985 sad
Capt. America would be happy, soon he will command a fleet.
Captain Marvel is running the show now.
The newest carriers NEVER need to be refuled.
Advanced military weaponry minimizes risks for our troops during missions. Their precision and versatility empower our soldiers to succeed in various scenarios with reduced casualties.
If we can activate antigravity, an air carrier might not even be a dream.
And people are grinching about putting out a few bucks for college debt relief!!🤬
Extreammmmmly Impressive! Go USA!
I’m reminded of a reaction from my youth: “when pigs fly”. 😂
Plus the amount of personnel that has to be on an aircraft carrier you're just asking for the entire crew to be slaughtered when a gust of wind causes this aircraft to lose control in the air.
Nah. Pretty sure the USAF keeps Dr. Strange on retainer in case of strong gusts and/or melodramatic flying villains👌
I think it would only work if it was a drone carrier.
I can't imagine how much energy to lift it up in the air; 10.000 gallons?.
I watch these vids so the thumbnails keep on coming lol
Straight out of an episode of Dr Who .
Just FYI to all watching, the idea of a flying 'aircraft carrier' doesn't mean a literal carrier strapped to engines. It's more along the lines of a super sized transport plane that can deploy fighter jets from its underside.
Although a flying hover carrier would be cool, it would be incredibly difficult with today's tech and needless to mention would cost the gdp of a small country just to operate and maintain.
We already have those ... aka fast attack jets that can in air refuel off a mother tanker or tankers to extend their range/standoff time but the concept of a flying air base is about as practical as a flying aircraft carrier ... As in what's the point? The crew can only be in air for so many hours ... the mechanical engines n gubbins need maintenance n downtime, both can easily be defeated with tracking n missiles ... I'll believe it when Elon Musk tells us its the future :p and he's not even that dumb!
The biggest viable plane that could carry other planes is the Russian Antonov ... it could carry 2 m1a1 Abrams tanks, is slow, guzzles fuel, needs innordately long runways ... so could technically carry 2 mid sized fighters, if you could figure out how to launch them as it has a front lifting nosecone which that ain't happening! Or you just push em out the back ramp and hope the engines fire up ... oddly your pragmatic idea of a plane based plane system is even worse than a flying aircraft carrier! Which is sorta impressive! :)
Imagine the cost when one of those gets hit by a missile and goes down. Or even worse just has a malfunction and crashes. Looks expensive.
Damn these carriers are crazy
The energy consumption for sustainable flight is untenable. Not to mention a giant stationary target. So it would need to have an anti gravity zero fuel propulsion system and complete stealth technology. Yep. Super realistic. I just spent 3 hours at the DMV cause the website is broken . Lol. GTFOH
Thank God. I had extra money this year I was just dieing to spend on taxes for military toys.
Stfu if Russia or china attacked you would be not worried about tax money because you would be stuck hiding from nuclear fall out .
wow these designs are great
Flying aircraft carriers gotta be hella durable
Are their any plans to launch planes from the side of the aircraft carrier?
Title should have added ".. Ready for Action in 2122, with Anti Grav Technology.. maybe"
Lol
the future is crazy!
THEY'VE HAD THESE FOR A VERY LONG TIME...
An aircraft carrier that flies so incredible it must have been very clever and brilliantly engineered. It's a truly amazing sci-fi-like design. An amazing project But I think America has very good thinkers and designers.
This whole thing is bs dude
It's fictional rubbish. Dislike crap content like this.
LOL. Not the brightest bulb, are ya?
5:40 The CL-1201 could have been what flew over Phoenix, Arizona in "The Phoenix Lights" incident.
I used to live in Chandler heights Arizona, I had as close a look to it as anyone could have had. It flew right past me and it was very big, totally silent. But not shaped like an aircraft carrier. Shaped like the stealth bomber, but big enough at least, to park two bombers on each wing.
@@wytche3546 Wow. Have there been any other sightings that you know of? Or could you recommend any videos or sources? I find the incident fascinating and I really want to know more.
Go, Navy🙏🏽♥️😊
thank you . ( 2023 / Dec / 19 )
Seems like a bad idea; because it may not be able to stay airborne, if hit. True, an aircraft carrier may not be able to float, if hit, but the latter sounds better.
Better to sink than to take a 50k feet dive into the ocean
Exactly, while the ocean holds you up ... the sky let's you fall ... It's simple really, take one countries advanced weapon system then develop a cheap counter measure ... aka 100 million dollar fighter vs 500k anti fighter rocket ... May not take it out but will stand it off/disrupt it's ability to be effective... think the NVA with Russian Sam's vs the USAF in Vietnam... they backed off the most advanced n militaria aggressive country on earth with basic fire n forget rockets ...
Like someone already said in the comments, it's easier to swim then to fly
Lol, yea, right! 🤣🤣🤪🤣. We can't even fix our roads and highways! How are we supposed to make buildings fly!?
Blame your local politicians on that one.
It's called The Military Industrial Complex
Thanks for welcome to Washington DC
Flying tanks and submarines are the next objectives.
Break it down to 10 fighters per plane carrier. Have 5 slots on each end or wing for each aircraft that raises the fighters into the wings for maintenance and weapon loading.
That's one of the key factors in my prototype --- it can't be The Avengers, but it can be. If you're interested in how feasible my idea is I'll be glad to send you a free copy of my thriller CODE NAME: Monte Rico, where I invented five new weapons. I actually did the calculations for how this would work --- tweak the parameters, not that hard.
@@theinformationcollector833 Now imagine a sorty of 4 or 5 of these planes with 4 drones each plane. Any military skirmish could be over in hours. Like a symphony orchestra 🎻.
@@jessmason2112 Very true --- and that tech is WWII level. Marilyn Monroe was discovered cause she worked in a drone plant the photographer went to shoot pictures at. They were basically RC models used for target practice, but still drones.
@@theinformationcollector833 Regardless of when the idea came about. If that idea with today's technology would make that sorty untouchable. What a major deterrent that would be to take out a terrorist group or area in one shot with no boots on the ground.
Could understand a smaller version with armed drones, but I’m sure that it’s already underway.
🇪🇺🇬🇷👋
they could build
a small carrier
.1 big plane
carrying
1 small fighter jet
like space shuttle plane
it's the only logical solution
1 big plane
carrying a fighter jet
close to battle
and then leave it to fly
to save fuel
🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷👋🙏🙏🏴☮☮☮🇺🇦🇷🇺🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👑👋🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🏴🏴🏴🏴
DONT, MESS WITH THE US 🇺🇸
Just from the title I know this video will be faker than those mobile app ads
Until they allow us to have gravity drives none of this will never exist.
The F-35 is so lethal it kills the enemy and the pilot.
the large triangle lights formations that people been seeing in the night skies over the years, I wonder just what they could they be? usually not far from a desert
We are a long way from a real Avengers type carrier.
imagine how heavy it is to fly😳😳
Considering its running on 4 turbine propellers. Im sure it'll be fine
Most likely nuclear reactors aswell
@@dusk07 true
I can't even imagine. Just the turbine blades will be millions of pounds. I can't believe they will fly around with multiple air wings aboard, possibly try to have another carrier 100 miles away for stowing aircraft, and just be used to refuel or get really close to targets. I was in the gear, so I'm very interested to see.
Yall remember when communicators on star trek were unheard of? This can be built. But tactical usefulness and as to what problem it solves is yet to be determined.
The amount of fuel a flying aircraft carrier would need outweighs the weight of the whole thing itself. Leave this to Marvel comics.
You have to be out of your mind if you think we will have this any time soon, if we ever do. Think about the government trying to get all the auto manufacturers to go EV. The cost and amount of fuel to keep this thing in the air would bankrupt all of us and send our taxes soaring.
Think about it, the only reason why air craft carriers work and are convenient is because they float naturally.
Justin Bulgherini That's the scary thing! The Biden administration is insane!
Those carriers are from the Winter Soldier movie.
Very super.. USA's
American carriers aircraft jets be safe God bless you 🙏🙏🇱🇷🇱🇷🌏🌏
If they are just now announcing it
It’s already happened years ago
All one has to do is
Look up the name
Gary McKinnon
Thank you for this video --- about a decade ago I pulled together a prototype project for some content I was working on and you just inspired me to revive it. My literary & production skills have improved since then, so it should get off the ground (see what I did there) better.
This is an amazing video and I think you covered bases pretty well --- my research was fairly exhaustive. Thank you for this, it was awesome.
(BTW, my retired Spec Ops refused comment when I asked them about the C-130 prototypes.)
The detail of digital construction is only limited to current technology and mans imaginative creativity.
No matter how advanced we think US is, building a flying aircraft carrier is literally IMPOSSIBLE in present. Maybe in 100-200 years we can. But not today nor in the near future.
The lockheed CL-1201 was a waste because of the lost space due to wingspan. They say "size" does matter.