Which cruise missile is more powerful, Tomahawk or Kalibr cruise missiles?
Vložit
- čas přidán 12. 01. 2022
- The Tomahawk Land Attack Missile (TLAM) is a long-range, all-weather, jet-powered, subsonic cruise missile that is primarily used by the United States Navy and Royal Navy in ship and submarine-based land-attack operations.
The 3M-54 Kalibr cruise missiles developed by the Novator Design Bureau . There are ship-launched, submarine-launched and air-launched versions of the missile, and variants for anti-ship, anti-submarine and land attack use. Some versions have a second propulsion stage that initiates a supersonic sprint in the terminal approach to the target, reducing the time that target's defense systems have to react, while subsonic versions have greater range than the supersonic variants. The missile can carry a warhead weighing up to 500 kilograms (1,100 lb) of explosive or a thermonuclear warhead.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv
/ militarytv.channel
defense-tv.com/ - Věda a technologie
US$195,000 What can a Black Hornet drone do? czcams.com/video/9IkaP6XMNZw/video.html
А война в Украине как раз по причине тамогавков. С территории Украины можно поражать цели в центральной России. Договориться не получилось .Вот и результат.А какая сильнее нет смысла сравнивать.И та и другая убивает а не щекочет.
@@user-ou6bv3fw4d Ты кретин.
Если не в курсе, согласно договоренностям между США и РФ ракеты малой и средней дальности (наземного базирования) не могут распологаться в Европе, морского можно, а подходящих морских носителей у Украины нет))) Р.С. ракеты могут появиться не только на Украине но и на Кубе или у Ирана
@@zaczac1934 Согласно договоренности и Украина имела нейтральный статус.Только договоренности все летят в попу. Не так ли? Покажи хоть один договор который не нарушен? Борьба с терроризмом обернулась террором.И покрывается ООН.Не странно ли?
Калибры уже летают на Украине каждый день, а Томагавки ржавеют в США🤣🤣🤣
One correction. Kalibr doesn’t use GPS for navigation, it uses Glonass. It’s a stupid idea for RU military to use GPS.
Right 😉
Yes because the United States can turn it off they own most of the GPS satellites in the world
@@jacoblongbrake8230 no, its because gps jamming is common play these days.
@@Diggles666 ooh ookay..
He meant GNSS (Global Nation Satellite Systems).
Actually, Russia has always had cruise missiles since cold war.
Yeah i dont get where they got this "Russia didnt have Cruise missile before kalibr". They literally had best Anti-Ship cruise missiles in the world P-500 Bazalt(1963) and P-700 Granit(1985). Both having really advanced guidance system where missiles work together to target different ships and only having having to pop op for target scan.
Then there are P-270 Moskit,RK-55 and SS-N-3 Shaddock last one being from 1959.
USSR developed it, modern Russia is still relying on soviet technology
@@fraerok01 Russia is still the Soviet Union, even contrary to the opinion of Putin and our anti-Soviet elite. For a long time the Americans referred to the USSR as "Soviet Russia", now they call it "Modern" Russia.
Russia doesn't go around the world bombing countries...that's why most haven't seen their capabilities.
@@Sarfanger target scan by its active seeker??
I wonder, who's going to tell authors of video, that Soviet union had TWO such missiles, from different lineups and design bureaus, since 80s as well? Kh-55 and S-10.
That's what I thought too.
Actually, the 'author' of the video is not even the author. He has just blatantly stolen the info he uses in the video above from an article from Naval Post called 'Which cruise missile is more powerful, Tomahawk or Kalibr?'. He should keep his fingers crossed that the original author doesn't find out about that.
Hes a pro American propagandist.
Piotr
Did anyone told you, Russian rusted tank's the keep burning in Ukraine like pile of wood's
They were not that good so no point boasting about them.
>1:42 Until 2015, it was thought that only the USA and Britain had this capability
1958 The Raduga KSR-2 fitted with a one-megaton nuclear warhead
1962 The Raduga KSR-5 supersonic, fitted with a 350kt nuclear warhead
1962 KSR-11
1961 K-10S supersonic, fitted with nuclear warhead
1960 Kh-20 supersonic, fitted with nuclear warhead
1960 P-15 Termit
1968 Kh-22 supersonic, fitted with 1Mt thermonuclear warhead
1968 P-70 Ametist
1983 Kh-55
198? Kh-101
1984 P-270 Moskit
Legend says it is still thought so to this day.
They are mostly anti ship missiles or land based missiles based on anti ship missies therefore they are not much useful against land based targets....... tomahawk was specially designed to engaged long range land based targets.
@@DipakkrSaha "Mostly" is quite not the same as "no at all".
@@xfxox See, here you gave example of p 15 missile which is soley used for anti shipping purpose and shore based targets to some extent(by limited land attack, I meant attacking shores only) . For precised deep strikes, you need capabilities like TERCOM which is absent in those missiles.
@@xfxox I like this.
@@DipakkrSaha I see you are very good in this field of knowledge. Could you tell me the range of the best American cruise missile in 1958? And could you tell me " FOR WTF TERCOME you talked about in 1958 ?!?!?!
Or you speak just to have "BLA BLA" comments here ?!?!?!?
The russian weapon can do a supersonic sprint in the terminal phase; useful vs ships,etc
Also the YJ 18
Nope - only one variant.
It's basically attaching an extra booster, I bet similar modifications can be made without having to develop entire new missile.
@@abdiganiaden not possible for tomahawk. Vls is too small
Only for antiship variant. Also for much shorter range about 150-450km
Also the missile tip is different, rounded for cruise missiles variant and sharp cone for antiship variant.
To the question: “what is better in terms of price and quality”? - My accountant always asks: "Chief, are we selling or buying?"
Пожалуй сделаю скриншот
Russia has a different usage doctrine from the US so direct comparison are hard to make. However, the Russian approach has proven interesting and cost effective.
В СИРИИ ТАМАГАВК ПОКАЗАЛ СЕБЯ.ДВА ЭКЗЕМПЛЯРА ПОПАЛИ В РОССИЙСКИЙ НАУЧНЫЙ ЦЕНТР ДЛЯ ЕГО ИЗУЧЕНИЯ.ЕГО ПАРАМЕТРОВ .А ВОТ КАЛИБР БЬЁТ С ТОЧНОСТЬЮ ДО МИЛЛИМЕТРА.А ДАЛЬНОСТЬ ЕЁ ПОЛЁТА СОСТАВЛЯЕТ БОЛЕЕ 2000 КМ А НЕ 1500 А ЕЩЁ ОНА СПОСОБНА НЕСТИ ЯДЕРНУЮ БОЕГОЛОВОКУС САМОНАВЕДЕНИЕМ.НИ ОДИН РАДАР НЕ МОЖЕТ ЕЁ ЗАСЕЧЬ ЕЁ МОГУТ ОБНОРУЖИТЬ ЛИШЬ ПРИ ПОДЛЁТЕ К ЦЕЛИ НУ КОНЕЧНО УЖЕ НИЧТО НЕ ПОМОЖЕТ ОТ ЕЁ УДАРА В ТАКИХ УСЛОВИЯХ. КРОМЕ ОНИ МОГУТ РАБОТАТЬ В КОМАНДЕ И ПЕРЕДАВАТЬ ИНФОРМАЦИЮ ДРУГ ДРУГУ ЧЕМ НЕ МОЖЕТ ПОХВАЛИТЬСЯ АМЕРИКАНСКИЙ ТАМАГАВК .ВЫ АМЕРИКАНЦЫ ВСЕГДА ПРИНИЖАЕТЕ РОЛЬ ЧУЖИХ РАЗРАБОТКАХ ТАМАГАВК ЭТО РАКЕТА ПРОШЛОГО СТОЛЕТИЯ А РАКЕТА КАЛИБР ЭТО РАКЕТА НОВОГО ПОКОЛЕНИЕ И НЕ НАДО УТВЕРЖДАТЬ ЧТО ОНИ ОДНОГО ПАРАМЕТРА.ЭТО СОВСЕМ РАЗНЫЕ ПО СВОЕМУ СТРОЕНИЮ .У РОССИИ ЕСТЬ ЕЩЁ ОДНА РАКЕТА НА ЯДЕРНОМ ТОПЛИВЕ ЭТО БУРЯВЕСТНИК. ОНА МОЖЕТ НАХОДИТСЯ НЕСКОЛЬКО СУТОК В НЕБЕ ТО ЕСТЬ УДАРИТЬ ТОГДА КОГДА ЭТОГО НЕ ОЖИДАЕТ ПРОТИВНИК ТАК У РОССИ НЕ ОДИН АРСЕНАЛ А МНОЖЕСТВО.ЧЕГО НЕТ У США И ЕЕ СОЮЗНИКОВ..КСТАТИ ЭТИ РАКЕТЫ МОГУТ ДОЛЕТЕТЬ НАПРИМЕР ДО ЕВРОПЫ ЗА ПЯТЬ МИНУТ ИЗ АКВАТОРИИ ЧЁРНОГО МОРЯ. НУ А ЕСЛИ ОНИ УДАРЯТ КАЛИБРАМИ НАПРИМЕР НА ДАЛЬНЕМ ВОСТОКЕ ПО США ГДЕ РОСТОЯНИЕ ДО США ВСЕГО ЛИШЬ 83 КМ ТО БУДЕТ ДОРОГО СТОИТЬ США .У РОССИИ ВСЁ ЕСТЬ ВСЕ ПРИРОДНЫЕ БОГАТСТВА НУ ПО ТЕРРИТОРИИ ОНА САМАЯ БОЛЬШАЯ ЧАСТЬ ПЛАНЕТЫ .И ЗЕМЛИ СВОЕЙ ХВАТАЕТ ТАК ЗАЧЕМ РОССИИ НА КАКОГО ТО НАПАДАТЬ .ВАС ВСЕХ ЗОМБИРУЮТ МНИМОЙ УГРОЗОЙ ДЛЯ СВОИХ ЦЕЛЕЙ ВАШИ ПРАВИТЕЛИ,ВАШИ ОЛИГАРХИ.И ВАШ НАРОД ВЕРЯТ В ЭТОТ БРЕД.АМЕРИКАНЦЫ ПОСМОТРИТЕ СОВЕТСКИЙ МУЛЬТФИЛЬМ КОТ ЛЕОПОЛЬД. ТАМ ОН ГОВОРИТ ДАВАЙТЕ ЖИТЬ ДРУЖНО В МИРЕ
@@user-pk2sg9kt9k Красава....👍
@@user-pk2sg9kt9k Молодчик! 👍⭐
It hasn't proven shit!
Россия мощь......
Zirkon is in mass production, that changed the whole game.
Thank you comrad Taylor.
It's interesting that the United States always understates the performance of its weapons while the Russians overstate the performance of theirs
@@jamesricker3997 Lol not really. Counterpoint: A10 Warthog. Everybody's favorite but look just a little deeper. . .
@@jamesricker3997 So the American Patriot air defense system is much superior to the S-400 air defense system. Clear. Thank you friend, I am glad to know that Russian weapons can be compared exclusively only against Somali.
@@pluffer96 Actually I'm canadian fella with some commonsense.
The USSR also had cruise missiles analogous to the tamahawk, which were put into service back in 1984, and they had been developing them since 1975, but their states were asked to remove them from the agreement on medium-range missiles. The name of this missile is S-10 "Granat" (URAV Navy Index: 3K10, according to NATO codification: SS-N-21 "SAMPSON").
The Caliber missiles are not really TAmagavk, this is a family of missiles of various ranges and purposes, including in the anti-ship missile version with a supersonic detachable missile with a warhead, and sea-based cruise missiles of the Granit type (URAV Navy Index: 3M45, according to NATO codifications: SS-N-19 "Shipwreck"), "Volcano" (Navy URAV Index (missiles): 3M70), (Navy URAV Index - 3M55, according to the classification of the US Department of Defense and NATO - SS-N-26 Strobile), May hit also on earthly targets in the depths.
And METIORITE - 1
Ты ещё чертежи скинь
It's telling that the Americans were adamant that Russian claims of hacking and re-targetting tomahawk cruise missiles in Syria were propaganda then the block V comes out in 2021 with the main upgrade is making them harder to hack.
lmao, source on that please xD
Whichever has better tech to evade missiles defense and EW countermeasures will win.
Yes there is no evidence these hit their targets, and Russia showed off undetonated missiles they took down. Yet this video claims the aging tomahawk has better ew resistance. If that's true than Russian ew is way ahead of us.
@Varangian Guard Yes I remember that ... that was the one where the USA claimed that 20 + tomahawks were used to destroy an unhardened low rise university building.
@ $2 million/ea for the missiles + the cost keeping a fleet of ships in the Mediterranean ... I would have done the job for $250K using 2 excavators and I would have left them with a nice clean site ... the superstructure was still standing after the strike.
Either Tomahawk missiles are extremely smart and won't damage anything they aren't supposed to ... or they are complete crap ... or one or two tomahawks hit the site and the rest were disabled.
@@evo3s75 rt sputnik and tucker carlson
What's crazy, is that for less money, our opponents are able to outrange our missiles while able to go as fast or even faster and deliver the same or more payload for cheaper. Just astounding.
porque es un negocio de exprimir los tributos públicos....
The first time I knew the cost of Tomahawk missile was during the US mission in Libya (vs Moamer Gaddafi). 1 million usd per missile, there goes my dads tax 😭😭😭
Russians and Chinese working on the development and production of weapons are likely paid 10 times less than Americans. Also the sector is owned by the government so they don't use private corporations to make astronomical profits at the expense of tax payers.
@@starchild692 oh yeah I read it once that weapon factories like "United Aircraft Corporation" (the merging body of Mikoyan, Sukhoi, Tupolev, etc) is owned by the government. I think that explains why Russian price on developing-producing the cruise missiles is cheaper compared to US
In Yugoslavia we shut down more then 500 tomahawk missiles
Russia developed many cruise missiles in a span of 5-10 years, Kalibr is just one of them. P-800 Oniks, Indian Brahmos, the deadliest : Zicron and the future P-900 Alfa and Brahmos 2.
The Kalibr-M is like a hybrid of zicron and Kalibr since it is also hypersonic nature.
I didn't get why talk about obsolete tech? Doesn't US have something more advanced such as Russian Avangard or Sarmat?
@Chano Leyva Missiles arent really that expensive you know, at most a single one may cost just around 1 million, and even less since its Russian system not a US one.
The kalibr-M is not hypersonic, i dont know where you get this.
Its a regular kalibr missile with conformal fuel tanks to extend its range, just like the k-55 with conformal tanks.
@Chano Leyva ahh yes the good old, we keep our stuff secret story.
Isnt the US one of the most open countries in regards to weapon development. Yes it is. In fact its less then a month ago when the US reported its hypersonic strike weapon just failed for the third time during testing.
Meanwhile its actually Russia and China that keep most of the details about their programs secret.
@@LodewijkVrije Russia is also open about their development, don't we know the performance of Su-57? Yes we do, while u are correct with China.
Thanks for the awesome uploads!
Our pleasure!
Now you can see how Kalibr works in real videos
or rather their pathetic performance
@@napobg6842 pathetic? They f*cking blew up military bases like nothing bro .
@@napobg6842 по тебе прилетит будешь сам жалкий
@@CJ-52 You know I'm not gonna even bother translating your comment.
@@napobg6842 Google translate 🤣
The events in Ukraine have shown that the Caliber has a very powerful jamming system on board, there is a video. in which two missiles of the Ukrainian S-300 system fly past the Caliber missile, ignoring it. Of course, Ukraine has old S-300 systems, but the oldest S-300 is more perfect than the newest Patriot complex
Supersonic terminal of Kaliber is a big difference
I don't the remember where I read the article but is more or less as follows: During Dessert Storm the first 200 cruise missiles were declared "obsolete" and the loss expected was 50%, only two crashed, other two were shoot down by AAA. Effective rate of 98%. Even the military officials were "frozen" with the result.
And when the Russia Defense Minister declared that they had shot down 71 of the 105 cruise missiles fired by Trump, France and UK it was found that almost all missiles found their target. (once crashed a launch) That was confirmed by craters from satellite imagery. They also claimed they jammed the rest. Nothing the Russians say about their weapons is accurate. Tomahawk is affordable and reliable. The Mk II version has 1350nmi range (about 2400km). If The USN wanted to it could increase range so it could continue using the same missile from the same launch cells simply by fitting a modern Turbofan engine. similar to the Mk II. It seems the USN has other ideas.
@@williamzk9083 I wouldn't stake my life on what the West says about foreign weapons should I be stationed in an airfield.
@@Tattlebot
US weapons are tried and tested and they take years to develop because the testing process is so complex. And when the weapons are in service they work.
You say you would not stake your life on them well they took out the Syria base that launched chemical attacks.
@@bighands69 that's not true. For example, HARM has a dismal record against second and third rate adversaries in Serbia and Iraq. Harpoon, HARM, and Tomahawk are just too slow. The probability of interception by a serious adversary like Russia or China is very high. The US tries to create a Tom Clancy perception of their military capability while in real life, many systems are not fit for purpose.
@@bighands69that's absolutely not true....many American weapons are unreliable or hard to maintain.
I hope advantages and capabilities of both missiles on real targets will not be tested in next months.
I fuckin hope they do...m
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Caribbean crisis 2.0: See you soon boys 😉
nah! Russia doesn't want war only the US wants war.
@@0farmerjohn0 Yep
In Syria:
Tomahawk: 109 pieces for 3 targets = not 100% efficient.
Kalibr: 24 pieces for 12 targets = 100% efficient.
I have no idea what you're talking about. You ever watch Ukraine, Russia highly precision rockets turned around and killed themselves. Everything they have is not built on precision. They even have trouble hitting moving cars.
@@snsproduc lol it happened once and it was air defence missiles not cruise missiles 🤦♂️🤦♂️
@@snsproduc that video was uploaded weeks earlier than the one you saw on CZcams. And it was uploaded by Ukrainians.
@@nikosmosxos5856 keep telling your self what ever fake shit you wanna know.
by the way we had trump as our president and that's why for all the cruise missile on one base, use common sense
I just ordered 5 kalibr and 3 tomahawk from Amazon to compare, ill be back.
Как то очень скромно автор умолчал о залпе по Сирии сотней топоров из которых семьдесят не долетели до цели. Многие упали по непонятным причинам. Это об устойчивости ракеты к воздействию РЭБ.
К тому же Калибр развивает скорость до 2.5 маха.
А топор дозвуковой.
Сравнение:
XXI век и XX.
Больше телевизор смотри
@@Hugo_Stiglitz_1
Алекс! У тебя есть другие данные?
Если нет, то сопи в две дырки)
@@user-ex8rh8sd5w о запуске калибров вообще нет данных. По твоей логике этих запусков вообще небыло?
@@Hugo_Stiglitz_1
А какие данные тебе нужны?
Известно, что долетает с Каспийского моря до Средиземного, а с Черного до Львова.
Номенклатуры экспортных ракет(в урезанном по ТТХ характеристикам) в открытом доступе. Википедия может помочь. Более десяти вариантов.
2.5 маха - это Брамос, а не калибр 3м14. Калибр почти равен томагавку, но имеет большую дальность
I hadn't watched the video, gonna watch later. But if we are not being biased then I believe everyone who has knowledge know that generally Russia has more powerful missiles.
You should ask ukrainians about Kalibr accuracy. This people have answer for all question asked ever.
Well, when you bombed half of the world, you definitely see your missiles in combat operations.
First of all....France also has cruise missile . It's the MdCN, the naval version of Scalp missile.
Second....Russia use the GLOSNAS system.Not the GPS.
They also forget about Soviet S-10
GLONASS and GPS are basically the same but names
@@timookello3822 no they are totally independent to each other
@@Stephano.MBravo1 I guess I didn't make a proper distinction between the two...both are used for global position and navigation but produced by different countries.
Glonase and gps are the same thing.
A Toyota and a Nissan are the same thing... both are vehicles made by different companies.
@@timookello3822 so me and you we are the same thing? Just born from different moms in different countries but still we are clones....!???? Are u listening to yourself?🤣🤣🤣🤣
Kaliber is faster and with longer ranges , both are accurate with targets , this point is not a problem for huge super powers , both have advaced navigation systems .
The real range the tomahawk is greater than the official figures
United States never releases accurate numbers for its active weapon systems
@@jamesricker3997 wasn’t it the standard in military? All country never releases real figures(usually more than 50% boost compared to announced figures)
@@jamesricker3997 during 2017 attacks in Syria, Syrian sam systems managed to shot down 90% of tomahawks missiles fired, and we are talking about old soviet sam systems. Modern russian built sam systems can easily defeats any tomahaks attack. Like the us patriot sam systems the tomahawk is a faillure.
@@mcbmcb5163 Yep, the US military tech is growing older with each passing day. Russia and China are already ahead of them in most of the cases. Compared with what the US has, Chinese destroyers are superior, Both the Chinese and Russian missiles are better, Russian tanks are better and the advantage the US had with its 5th gen aircraft is quickly eroding. Especially considering F-35, aka the 'Flying Coffin', constant failures.
@@mcbmcb5163 that's Russian propaganda lol, unless that 90% can be independently verified, the 2017 attacks was a success. Anyways the Tomahawk is a subsonic missile, shooting it down is pretty easy regardless
For safety of launch pad it is better use first stage propulsion using water air pressure and magnetic then other propulsion after airborn
Excelente video y comparación 👍 muy imparcial y acertada..!! De todas, los 2 cumplen con el objetivo para los que fueron creados..!!
Correction:
Tomahawks arent dependent on GPS entirely.
They would refernce the terrain data with downloaded sattelite terrain data, to gauge position.
US aircraft and missiles have star trackers that can locate them to within 180m day or night and through cloud. That's how a trident would locate itself should the GPS satellite system be destroyed. Once over land a tomahawk can user its radar for terrain counter mapping and a camera for digital scene correlation. The accuracy won't be effected at all if GPS was lost.
Love the details bro keep it up thanks 😊😊😊
Thanks
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
?
In essence, it finishes where it started 😂
you madlad xD
Nice one mAh dude
wtf
rosjanie zakłócili tor lotu rakiet Tomahawk w syrii tak że w nic nie trafiły a amerykanie wystrzelili ponad 70 pocisków, są one obecnie uważane za przestarzałe i są modernizowane na zakłócenia elektromagnetyczne generowane przez rosjan
Elektromagnetische Technik sind die Russen den Amerikaner Jahrzehnte voraus.
This was actually very well prepared. It has given me new respect for the tomahawk. Sometimes it's better to stick to what works even if it's old.
And who said tomahhawks works? Only against third world nations without air defenses like Lybia and IRAQ. Kalibers are modern cruise missiles from 2012 , while Tomahacks are from the 80s..
Both have satatelite navigation , and both have ECM capabilies. there are different versions. Tomahwaks are subsonic.. While KALIBRS have super sonic version of them , 3x times faster than tomahawks. And Tomahawks range is about 1,200km while Kalibrs range is 2,600km. Is battle proven in the syrian war and now ukraine war ,have been able to hit with precision the most defended airspace in all europe and with more electronic warfare hostile environment. Kalibrs are combat proven way more than Tomahawks in Modern wars. Tomawaks is old tech ,and they not stealthy , and very easy to intercept.. look for Syrian cruise missiles strike by Trump.. about 95% of them intercepted /jammed or missed its target. Israel don't use them anymore. They have no choice to use tomawaks because they have a large inventory of them and need to be used. until they develop something new.
@@technoartfest8708 very true. America needs fifth generation cruise missiles with range and speed. In this area it lags not just the Russians, but also the Chinese , Europeans and Israelis. Even India outclasses America with it's brahmos. I just don't understand why America doesn't team up with Israel to produce world class missiles. Perhaps it's too proud. Israel just came out with the ice breaker. If America has any intelligence, it will try to get the technology of this missile before China does.
@@learnerm3120 Probably ,One of the big problems ,aside of Budget and cost , is the fact that US navy have about 50 to 60 arleigh burke class destroyers , that only compatible with Tomahawks. and also the fact that most of NATO ,their warships also use them and also because of the big inventory of tomawaks they have in storage. So building a new cruise missile means , they will also need to build a new destroyer class ,that can equip them. So is very expensive for US and NATO to switch to other cruise missiles ,without having warships that can use them.
@@technoartfest8708 It is an issue but not one that is insurmountable. For one , warships are not the only means of delivery. Secondly , warships can and do have different vertical launch systems. At least the Chinese design their new warships to be able to deliver missiles with different sizes. Third , holding yourself back because you have a bunch of 40 year old missiles you don't want to throw away could be a sign you are not ready for prime time.
@@technoartfest8708 Tomahawked have been continuously upgraded since introduced. Those Block Number and Mod numbers means something. Old usually means reliable and cheap.
I am happy to know the exact pronunciation of DSMAC. I was not sure about it.
Though I hope these weapons will serve only as deterrence and peaceful integration of the world,
I can’t help praising such technological power. Thank you for the informative movie😌.
Нам преподаватель рассказывал, как он в 70-ые делал систему распознавания ландшафта по спутниковым снимкам, которая использовалась для запусков крылатых ракет.
Интиресно
Пока противник строит планы , мы меняем ландшафт местности в ручную …
Tomahawks were not that effective in Iran. Half lost the other made minor damage. But the cost of that operation was huge
Iraq, not Iran.
@@timookello3822 ash-shayrat Siria to be eactly 😁
Well since we never used any in Iran I will say you made that up.
Can you please compare stuff using the same unit of measures eater miles or kilometers
Do math buddy. 1.6 kilometres to the mile
@@YaMomsOyster Why should he make math, the whole world, and the whole scientific community is using the metric system, that is, in fact, logical, not yards, feet, inches, pounds...
@@YaMomsOyster есть ещё морская миля 1,8 км, по этой причине просят использовать метрическую систему. Это позволяет избежать проблем.
Can you please also make comparisons of brahmos vs tomohawk and others..
You forgot to mention when US fired at Syrian airport, most of the tomahawks never made to its targets. Also bunch of them were landed by Russian, at which point it never detnanated and was taken apart
Why are so many people repeating this lie?
@@napobg6842 Can you elaborate on what specifically are you talking about?
@@TA-op3vn "You forgot to mention when US fired at Syrian airport, most of the tomahawks never made to its targets"! No need for me to elaborate on anything. When you are the one telling the lie you obviously know what am I talking about
@@napobg6842 the fact that he didn't respond is a clear sign of his guilt.
@@laknidubandara Obviously because it is one thing when he and people like him just talk and a whole other thing to prove it. Like there were video in the very same day in the morning showing the amount of damage. There are satellite images confirming the hits.
Seems like there is a lot of room to electronically jam a tomahawk
Kalibr is a successor of Kh-55/555.
Very fair and objective.
Isn't the Kalibr cruise missile supersonic at the terminal phase while the tomahawk is sub-sonic? Isn't this a distinct advantage? So how is it not possible to make a complete comparison?
Yes it is and this video is based on a bias.
Нет калибр полностью дозвуковая ракета.... Но в ролике не сказано о том что калибр может, некоторых модификаций может ставить помехи вражеским РЛС. Плюс калибр летит намного ниже томагавка...
Russia has Kalibr since 1994 in operational service,, not 2015.
Что теперь скажешь на счёт точности калибра ?
Не точнее Нептуна 👌
@@Sailren серьезно?
Russian missile does not have a racist name.
Lol
Shahed 136 joined the game
A Siria dispararon 111 misiles incluyendo más de 80 tomahawk, más de 80 fueron derribados y el resto explotaron perdidos en el fin de mundo!
google it before spitting propaganda from a known lier
Russian response is always cheaper and effective compared to US ones
Aha say that to the Russian in Ukraine. They ddidn't know that their missiles were effective
@@napobg6842 oh yeah that's why they have shot down around 100 Ukrainian planes
@@umeshchittirai Evidence?
@@napobg6842 his ass
Speed also should consider.
compare it with v-1 as well, please
Both missiles capabilities almost identical, ranges gap can be easily fix together with other technical differences. What makes kalibr better was the production cost per missiles.
production cost is one thing but western countries generally are much richer and can buy more with lower % of their GDP
@@hphp31416 nuclear fusion will balance everyone.
tomahawk is outdated, kalibr is already upgraded to double it's range
I guess US 763 billion dollars of military spending beats Russian 62 billion every time and any small differences in capability pale when you buy 1000's more of a slightly inferior missile, if indeed it even is.
US GDP 21 Trillion Russia 1.4, smaller than Italy. Also top 20 tech companies in the world the majority are US. So any advances the the Kaliber may have will be quickly surpassed
"almost identical" is "Kalibr is x2.5 faster and/or have triple the range". Oh, Yes, and cost lesser. UMMERRYKA FACK YEH!
Imagine if Tomahawk datalink being hijacked during mid-flight and then send them back to the shooter.
That's impossible 👎
How you gonna jam something that uses terrain to navigate? put a mountain in its way?
@@gyasiansa3358 Are you sure. Is the Tomahawk totally fire n forget? Any data two way system can be intercepted. Whether you can break through its firewalls and alter the data and base programming is a different thing.
@@robertwillis4061 Its been upgraded to be able to rely on other things, other than datalink,
Distance, speed and accuracy are the most important, and finally the launch.
Why did the author assume that the Caliber is susceptible to jamming , no rocket , unlike Tomahawks , was silenced in this way
Yeah today Russia is using kalibr
The Russians are very well able to jam Tomahawk missiles. They delivered proof in Syria. The US is not able to jam Kalibr missiles, so jut do the math? Kalibr wins on all fronts.
Out of 180 cruise missiles more than half still made it to their target in Syria… pucker factor and the USA can afford it
Where will you be if there's a war?
They can now send Tomahawks back by manipulate internal gps.
You can jam Kalibr navigation satellites just as easy as tomahawks, also a lot fewer Kalibr and a whole lot fewer launching platforms for its so do the actual math! Tom>Kal!
It's okay the United States has laser weapon platforms that can destroy the missiles they just put them on their C-130 they're f-22s A-10 and F-35
The consensus among military analysts is the Kalibr-M has a range of between 1500-2500 km, with the upper limit felt to be most likely.
Next: Brahmos vs Exocet
Tomahawk is an old system really. An amazing system by even todays standards, but we need to developers a new system that has hypersonic velocity.
Нельзя научить черепаху бегать со скоростью гепарда! для большой скорости нужен гепард! или кто то другой быстрый!
@@user-gu1ho1uo1y I cannot understand?
Russia has already developed such systems and uses them in its armmii. The United States is 15-20 years behind in this regard. By the time the US reaches such technologies, Russia will have made a new technological breakthrough
lol, kalibr is designed in 198
@@Aleks_N77 Yup just like in Ukraine they burned through all there drones and are using off the shelf components to make up for it. except not (no real time telemetry etc.)
Тамагавк медленная ракета на мем протяжении боевого полета. Колибр перед ударом набирает скорость несколько скоростей звука.
Key punch programing and onboard self correction map
IF a Kalibr is launched then a 3m22 zircon can be launched from the same firing tube
Kalibr 🔥🔥
One of them may be faster but what really matters is precision/ accuracy and 'least" CEP on target. A recent missile purported to have been fired on a missile/ rocket/ armament factory has hit an adjacent residential complex. Every missile is costly and in reality at times costlier than the targets they engage or are supposed to neutralise. If they don't do that they might as well be " dumb" bombs.
i saw this complex with hole from missile. it's not Kalibr.
It depend who used it and what purpose.
- The caliber is better at every possible point.
Well, if it's just the range, that is a drawback of Tomahawk - boosting that shouldn't be a problem! Upgrading everything else (which is already better than the other hardware around, including Kalibr, would be way harder! Hell, frankly I'd love the tech from a Tomahawk (no, I don't mean the explosive warhead, I mean the datalink, camera, computer and nav-system!) to play around with :D
The Mk II nuclear version has a 1350nmi range just by virtue of the 290lb W80 nuclear warhead versus that standard 1000lb warhead. The Williams F107-WR-402 700 lbf (3.1 kN) engine is quite old now and could likely be improved by 20%-30% in fuel burn. If the 1000lb warhead of the 899nmi range Mk V were replaced by a 500lb harpoon warhead and 500lbs extra fuel carried we would see 1.25 hours extra full speed cruise so about 500nmi extra so about 1400nmi range (2600km) or 1600 miles. With a new engine maybe should get to 2000 miles. The long range versions of Kalibr achieve their extra range by being much heavier than Tomahawk. So we can get 50% more range by going for a 500lb warhead, 20% more range by a new modern jet engine and 70% if both or implemented.
Also because of its on the fly reprogramming capabilities the Tomahawk is a very capable anti-ship missile
kaliber can work as anti ship missile two can change directions very fast with maneuvers to evade interception
@@oleof635 lmfao keep up that russian bullshit propaganda. First of the Kaliber has never been tested as an anti-ship missile where as the Tomahawk has, 2 the Kaliber has been proven to be very weak against radar jamming which makes it very vulnerable and 3 considering that the kaliber is supposed to be a hypersonic style missile, for it make any course corrections it would literally have to slow down to subsonic thrust which then makes it vulnerable to anti-missile batteries. By the way if I am not mistaken the Moskva is supposed to carry the naval version of the Kaliber as an anti missile, anti-ship missile system and yet the Moskva was sunk by a 15 year old Ukrainian built subsonic missile system called the Neptune. Yea keep up your bullshit you'll soon realize how worthless the Russian military is. Right now the only serious threat Russia has against any country are their Nuclear missiles.
Right now, Russia fired Kalibr rockets at my city from a small rocket ship "Buyan"
unsuccessfully
Ага) Передай тоже самое дому офицеров)
@@knightentertainment1200 ?
Я говорю про конкретно данный момент, а не про неэффективность "Калибров" в целом. :)
3M22. Funny you'd leave that game changer out.
The video doesn't contain accurate information, none can beat Russia when it comes to weapon technology. Tomahawk is subsonic and kalibr is a supersonic missile, the video uploader chose to ignore. There is no comparison b/w Tomahawk and kalibr, comparing Subsonic and Supersonic missile.
once fire is doesn’t need to looting around as it only stay in the air within 15-30 mins…so kaliber is longer range and pack more punch and cheaper to build.
yes maybe true that tomahawk has been in more combat that because usa been in so many war and invade so many country and not let them sort out their own civil internal affair but all kaliber missile hit all there target with greater distances when it first appear without failing which mean is have seen more upgrade now also.
Only thing that matters is the 1000 pound thermobaric warhead..... Which you didn't mention....
The best rocket is the one that hasn't been fired yet.
You forgot to mention one tomahawk problem - the MK41 VLS (used to launch tomahawks). Compared УКСК 3С14 it's smaller and wont allow any changes to tomahawk missle dimensions. So the longer US keeps using it the bigger gap will be between newer tomahawk and калибр versions.
The gap is very much on the American side. The Kalibr missile proved its low accuracy in Ukraine
If the USN needs a longer range than 900nmi it can get to 1350nmi with a reduced warhead or it could just improve the Tomahawke missile with a new engine which should get another 20% given current engine advances. both are better solutions than simply enlarging the missile. The USAF can get to 1500nmi with the ALCM and the USN can deliver a huge warhead with the ALRASM to 300nmi plus from a F-35 or FA-18E/F. At the moment 900nmi is plenty of range for operational needs given the USN has aircraft carriers and the USAF has B1,B2 and B52 capable of launching long range cruise missiles.
@@napobg6842 Low accuracy? That's why almost whole of Ukraine was blacked out between oct-nov 2022. And still targets today being hit.
@@westyork937 It is not hard to hit standing targets. Russia lacks when it comes to hitting moving targets. But their missiles sometimes fail to hit even standing targets. Btw hitting civilian targets is not something to brag about but that's just about what Russian can hit anyway.
Are those same Tomahawk missiles that was fired in Syria? What was the effectiveness against old Soviet air defense? 26%... Kalibr wins in many aspects.
LOL, yeah that's what the Russia's state controlled "RT network" told you. The satellite images release by the US prove that is a LIE! The missiles all hit their targets.
@@_Coffee4Closers satellite images from 🇺🇸...are those same satellites what told us about Iraqis Weapons of Mass Destruction? 😆 🤣
@@_Coffee4Closers You mean those satellite images which show a couple of craters on an airstrip of an airport, which were reportedly done by 100+ missiles?
@@_Coffee4Closers Сирия несколько почти неповрежденных показала томагавк
Не так все однозначно. И не такя уж и старая ПВО Сирии была в тот момент. Сами ракеты важны в ПВО, но основа это радар, а в небе над Сирией был тогда А-50. Такие машины очень хорошо с неба видят цели и отлично наводят ракеты. Да и да и новейшие Российские electronic warfare systems "Красуха" там были. Часть объектов всетаки были поражены, у Сирии ракет просто не хватило на всех.
Но в целом США в Сирии имели дело с старыми ракетами ПВО и новейшими радарами РФ.
Why do you keep randomly switching between miles and kilometers? Pick one and stick with it, or always give both.
If Kalibr so great, why does it rarely hit real military targets? Seems overly hyped.
@@user-ig4ov4rs9k Fucking millions of videos in Ukraine
Like what ? A tank?
Kalibr is supersonic rocket 1,2-3M, Tomahawk is subsonic 0,98M. Kalibr is protected from electromagnetic distortions, Tomahawk is not, witch is very important because Russians have very powerful jamming devises.
And yet the Russians aren’t able to destroy a single tomahawk missile in Syria with their S-400 xD
Ukrainians shoot down about half of all missiles shot at them, including Kalibr missiles. If Ukrainians had better anti-missile defenses, they'd probably shoot down all of them.
@@a0flj0 Although I am completely behind Ukraine in this bloody and unjustified war of destruction and aggression by Russia, I must say that this is nonsense. Ukraine, in my opinion, has launched a maximum of 5-20% of the missiles. Israel, for example, has one of the best defense systems in the world with the Irondome and also only manages just over half, but more than 80% of the missiles fired at cities. In such a large country as Ukraine with e.g. the Patriot PAC-3 system, maybe 40-50% would be possible. For important targets or cities like Kiev with good protection, maybe even more, close to 80%.
@@a0flj0 But this does not change the fact that Russian missiles are mostly dirty, especially because of the reliability of just 30-50%.
russian don't even have close the electronic warfare the West.
En el ataque a shairat quedo muy claro que el tomahawk por mas que lo modernicen es obsoleto a sistemas de interferencias e interceptacion. Por otro lado su historial de fallos a causado muchas disculpas por su capacidad de atacar blancos civiles como hospitales y centros de cruz roja.
Lo viste en rt
Si, lo viste en RT (Russian TV) 😆
@@maurysevilla3825 Solo las mentiras occidentales son las ciertas? no hay mas ciego que aquel que no quiere ver
Entonces se puede decir que nada es cierto
@@maurysevilla3825 siga viendo películas de hollywood donde EEUU siempre gana y tiene la mejor tecnología
so if US tested and fired Tomahawk 50 years ago and Russia only now managed to sort of catch up?😂😂😂 The stuff US has in secret must be pretty incredible. 50 years of development
russian bots that spaming now on each military channel how good their weapons are, lol please...
Tomahawk have high failure rate . in 2001 when USA fire them on Afghanistan the were flying over pakistan where about Dozen fall inside pakistan and which pakistan reverse engineered and made Babur cruise missile from it , which have range of about 800 km
Not sure about that but It has gone through 4 revisions form block 1 it is much more resilient now
I wonder if Russia will ever export them to other countries....
They do, under the export moniker club
А Х-555 с конформными баками не сравнивали?🤩🤩🤩
I think mach 3 in terminal stage is big advantage
Well there's a story somewhere in internet that tomahawk is being jam by Russia when the US Navy fire it in Syria.... This video is misleading a bit in my opinion 🤔🙃
Lol, russia air defense system are junk it cant hit a shit when israeli destroy the Syrian russian made AA defense battery equipped with their new pantsir and s300 and you think people wil believe russian propaganda Get your facts right
@@Slycarlo get your facts straight those were old air defense battery systems when Russia deployed there latest air defense, there prime minister went to Moscow to meet Putin about deconflicting channels
They are pre programmed
@@Slycarlo Russia's air defense system is excellent, and you are biased and myopic.
@@ozymandiasnullifidian5590 only th s400 and pantsir are good
Я не специалист, но могу сказать что у любой ракеты есть модернизационный потенциал.
Томагавк конечно староват, но и платформ для запуска калибров не так много...
Так что пока говорить о превосходительстве рано.
Калибр также не молодой, они почти одногодки с томагавками. Платформ калибров мы не знаем, но точно не намного меньше..
Kalibr doesn't have a data link says it all to me. I am still looking for a comparison between Russian smartphone and iPhone but Russia didn't publish any data so I assume that Russian phone is superior.
At least we know that Russians always go faster than US, Tomahawk is still subsonic after 40 years of existence ...
Now we know.
One moment that was always keeping me in wonder regarding weapon systems:
In USA, they literally create famous brands. And keep adding small iterations, so that current latest version is something otherwordly compared to prototype. True for AIM-9 especially, also true to Tomahawk and many other platforms, you name it. It sells well.
In Russia, they prefer to refurbish, repaint and rename older weapon system, add some smaller change to it - et voila - completely new weapon system. True for S-400 (repainted S-300), true for AK-12 (Just refurbished AK-74), true for T-90 (T-72 with western optics and radioelectronics) and so on and so forth.
I wonder how this can even be compared properly.
They were base design but has different system patched to it. But i agree. They should have not name it t90 since it's still based on T72 even with a major upgrade it should be name at least T73+++ not naming it as a new tank design
Original t90 is the shitiest tank ever. Only t90A was actually a new tank
Delusional
Are you an expert on the S400? Maybe the S500 is a repaint as well? The radar, range, electronics, and target types are completely different on all three systems. Or do you judge by the fact the launchers are on the same type of truck?
Yeah, completely different name everywhere.
"Невероятную" точность томагавка видел весь мир в Сирии, когда половина ракет улетело вообще в неизвестном направлении, а остальные взорвали пару ненужных сараев. Охренненая точность.
Ну это же Омерика. У них и промах , не промах, а так работаем по площадям.
C названием ошиблись ... половина каклибров даже до Сирии не долетела :)
@@AB-se4hl скоро вы на себе убедитесь в точности калибров
@@AB-se4hl это ты про тамагавки которые в Сирии при трампе выпустили а мы их заглушили и более менее рабочие в москву на освоение увезли
@@user-iy3po6ni7j ну вам то с магазина 100% виднее
Still the fastest missile is the U.S. Minuteman III, which reaches hyper sonic speeds of Mach 28.2 (28,200kph).
Comparing the Tomahawk, a missile from the 80s, with the Kalibr which just saw the light in 2012. Not a real good comparison.
The info used in the video is a direct copy/paste from a Naval Post article named 'Which cruise missile is more powerful, Tomahawk or Kalibr?'
In 1999, many Tomahawks were launched in Serbia, but few reached their destination. Too slow a rocket, too much for a 60's air defense. She just wouldn't stand a chance today.
Why don't you tell that to the Syrians who were on the receiving ends of the salvos of 67 or 68 tomahawks that hits their chemical weapons storage and their air force almost two years ago. Syrians are equipped with S-300, Buk-M2 and Pantsyr but wasn't able to intercept any of the block V Tomahawks. Speed is not always an advantage..... Tomahawk is five to six times faster than bayraktar Drones....Turkish drones were sold to Ukraine that angered Russia so much that they threatened to stop cooperating with Turkey on their S-400 deal with Russia. Why is that? Because Turkish drones "bayraktar" destroyed Russians mobile artillery in Ukraines breakaway Donbas region, the same drones that wrecked havoc to the Russian's military installations in Armenia and Libya.
There are two comments on the caliber. 1- a range of 2500 kilometers. 2- the guidance system is not GPS, but Russian GloNas
Kalibr is impressive, consider the much smaller Military budget of Russia compare to Nato
Замечательно, однако надеюсь, что это оружие не будет применено
Жаль что твои надежды не оправдались.