J Krishnamurt's inerview with BBC anchor
Vložit
- čas přidán 20. 08. 2021
- This video gives some inkling about Krishnamurti's teaching and the general philosophy behind it. In this inteview K gives the life's philosophy and his intent behind schools run by his foundation whole over the world. Very interesting and enlightning understanding about K's teachings. Since it was issued by BBC the video would be available for short duration for students of K's teachings as it would infringe the publisher's rights.
The interviewer is really professional, making it smoother for JK to explain
Yea both are very compose and calm
Speechless, please please please make his videos mandatory in all schools and colleges...... It has no religious connotations..... Any politicians with any power please take this up
Politicians will never do this
Why do you think what you've asked HASN'T BEEN HAPPENING.
The system does not want independent thinking.
They want to be the AUTHORITY.
exagerated. it's a theory which doesn't work on most people
I agree, please teach the children reality
Absolutely 💯
If only UN, governments and social media could sit down and reflect over these truth reflections of J.Krishnamurti, in 2024....
One of the best interviews of k
This is the most comprehensive interview I have seen of JK since I started looking up material from him 10 years ago
"...give thought it's right place".. . Wonderfully simple yet achingly powerful.
'Freedom from the known, ' is one of his books I've had for years, incredible human being! Someone once asked him about something they read in one of his books. He said, "I told you, don't read books!" 😆 😂 What a man ♥
Superb questions by interviewer
Bringing the timelessness of the East to the Restlessness of the West😅
There is no division. There is only Consciusness 🙏
no division, just opposites
He just rhymed it😂
How is it that JK is always fresh and seems to have something ever new and ever creative about him and his words no matter how many times you listen to him??😮😮
Truth is always fresh. His dialogue is not talking at us, but engaging us to participate.
That would b be a reflection of you. Hello!
I have been reading K for years and it seems no matter how many times I read his books I come away with at least one new insight. It's like finding new jigsaw puzzle pieces that fit and create a more complete picture. Krishnamurti is about understanding the self rather than belief. It took me awhile to put it all together and I'm discovering new layers of meaning all the time, it's beautiful. ❤
He has intelligence and creativity of understanding oneself.
@@kathleenc8810it is very hard to understand Krishnamurthy's ideas. Can you direct me to a book , video or article?
K was always teaching, not talking about his teaching, but teaching in the moment. If you engage him, you won't get conceptual dialogue but transformative dialogue.
Love you K sir and an amazing anchor. He asked appropriate questions with such clarity
Thank you, the interviewer asked relevant and pointed questions and K delivered, wonderful.
Yes the interviewer was really great and K. As you said delivered, rightly, precisely. Good video to have a short yet quite complete insight of his views.
Interviewer did an amazing job. There was no frustration in him. A practical person talking to an enlightened person.
Great questions and even better answers, excellent interview.
Thank you !
"You don't chose if you are clear! Without any conditioning of the mind." Fantastic.
Silence comes without a motive. You watch. To watch with great silence and alertness, there is something beyond words. We use words beyond all measures. We use words to measure the unmeasurable.
🙏🌏❤️🌿🕊🎵🎶🎵
Thanks for sharing this rare interview from Brockwood Park, 1981 featuring a fascinating encounter between K and Bernard Levin, a sharp and skeptical British journalist. They explore K's teachings on conflict, freedom from thought, authority, and meditation. Levin's confrontational style sparks a dynamic exchange, highlighting the clash between Krishnamurti's unconventional approach to self-understanding and traditional Western thought. This interview offers one of the most thought-provoking glimpses into Krishnamurti's philosophy and how it challenges conventional perspectives on spirituality and the human experience.
Thanks! I was about to ask in which year this was broadcasted.
There's no philosophy
this is the most subtle interview of JK. Good job by the anchor
The interviewer doesn't understand the deep non-dual metaphysics. That's why he constantly objects K with his simple minded questions.
He lacks understanding.
23' I wouldn't do anything under pressure ..... whatever the threat (fear)
"I refuse to be put under pressure"
What a great duo.. simply perfect!
We think more than we realize, realization has the ability to change things whereas thought cannot change anything. That's what Krishnamurti means.
We cant see these inteligent man in future😢
He is enjoying like a child no fear no sorrow, just the real He in full flow like a river.
It’s incredible how far ahead of his time that he was. Also it is like hearing two people speak two different languages.
Very true
I consider Krishnamurti supremely dexterous here in this conversation.
"Krishna-ji" is the nicest compliment to say...😊🌸💜
How patient had to be Jiddu all this years again and again trying to convince in his talks that light, hapiness, meaning, God etc. is already within us ..
This is gold.
Great personality great discussion love you
I have a humorous way of describing JK ji:- A man who spoke words neither understood by him nor understood by those who heard him!
Great interview
Haa. In just a few words. Jk. Schools this guy. Like no other. Incredible man. The greatest human being ever walked the earth
Beautiful…
Thank you Sir, been awhile listening to you & glimpse of joy im experiencing when all understanding of what you said. Hope one day i can visit your place in London❤❤
Jk did not school him. He has no ego. Interviewer was brilliant. He could interview someone having completely opposite viewpoint very effectively.
What are you talking about? The interviewer is just asking him questions to understand JK's unique perspective
I’ve been on a deeper search, again, for a system, a belief, a method that will bring about certainty and freedom.
Whenever I begin walking down a path in my search, I find flaws, inconsistencies, structures built on weak or non-existing foundations that to continue I’d have to suspend my reasoning.
I’ve tried to understand K’s thoughts before but was unable to do so as well as I think I understand thru this interview.
Perhaps it’s to do with my current search that’s with more life experience and exposure. Here’s key words to myself I’ve modified to emphasize the meaning of his message.
IN-telligence, IN-sight, IN-quiry, FREE-dom, CONDITION-ing
I’d welcome any comments to better understand his message.
There is also an interview with the italian public television RAI in the years '970 between Krishnamurti and Bruno Modugno...😅
This is very true thank you so much ❤❤
One more masterpiece ❤
Words definitely inspire humans to shed their vices. Look at the divine poetry of various saints that compels u to reflect on one's doings. Thought is useless when you want to ascertain the ultimate reality but thought is very powerful to figure out the serene way of living.
You must begin by putting the house in order, otherwise meditation is likely to become a forim of escape and hopeless seeking,
Thanks for yet another excellent conversation on sir k.k.
Bernard was a great interview. Respectful but fearless, no sycophancy.
No thought no problem. I am that I am.❤
WOW! ❤ just WOW!
K said, when you see the consequences of fear, lonliness, anger, greed, you just put it aside and never touch it. we all know this that anger is destructive, envy brings misery, etc but still we keep doing it, becuase we are not so sensitive about ourselves and our feelings. Desire of something has an upper hand to sensitiveness.
& the world is full of things that is destroying the sensitiveness of oneself and thats how one could be controlled by desire.
Wonderful interview by Wonderful interviewer ❤
What a clarity on his talk...it shd b understand by the very nature of all gurus,abrahmic religions...
Grazie
A great interviewer is a curious open and a flexible one.
Great interviewer
This is nothing compared to his other lectures where he goes deeply into the mind and behavior of thought, behavior of man. Some people are not ready for JK, to obtain freedom instantly. Is to see instantly, to see all of it, and at the same time delete it, delete the mind to start a new, then something different happens, every thought who enters the mind is pure, rich with light, rich with awareness, inner awareness, to use thought as a tool rather then to let it control you.
The freedom to never be affected by anything is not arrogance or ignorans, its inner freedom, freedom from the total condition of life we are born into. This life which is the path to death, is the ultimate freedom, the ultimate moment of letting go, death the road to awe.
Practical philosopher of all the time
This is another of the New Age interpretation of Buddha's teaching.
Krishnamurthi was clearly a nice fellow, but he doesn’t point out what self, or identity is, in this conversation.
Wow just wow
A man who walks and talks truth.
❤❤
There is no such things called timelessness of the east and restlessness of the west....as jiddu himself said human beings everywhere is exactly same...im from east india, here also people are extremely restless, overpopulated, violence etc etc etc etc etc......everywhere people are same....
🔥🔥🔥❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Awareness to what means to be human, passion, not being conditioned
wow! "you do not choose if you are clear"
excellent interview
Brilliant, thanks
The video title has a misspelled word.🖖
❤❤❤❤❤
Observe and experience facts and let them exist as they happen. Once you talk about them and remember them, you've changed them. Learn silence.
This is a tall claim he is making 😢that he has direct perception of things and that is why he is not conflicted. Wow!
Good
A path with no path what LaoTzu said
The Master.
Omg, I am simply amazed to see how fast both were shooting at each other a Perfect question and a perfect answer that clarified million years of confusion built up inside the consciousness.
I wonder why there are people still have “hard question of consciousness”.
I think there is a condition when some people reach this state of balance and authenticity but it is individual and not meant for groups and nations as few have it and not meant to be for masses!
What is the name of the interviewer ?
J Krishnamurti - A modern day Buddha.
Great interwier!
K was confused
K was not confused. It takes a grown up a very long time to answer an unusual question from a child. You will have a very difficult time explaining the timing of a total solar eclipse to a member of a tribe. Interviewer was brilliant and respectful.
It's all there, yet they have taken it and given it back to the mind. Back to square one. Now I can understand his sense of frustration with humanity.@@searchwikipediafallacy5567
Save Soil 🎉
Misspelled his name.
One can see the difficulty of trying to communicate that being silent, not trying is the only thing that is necessary. That consciousness contains all this stuff and all this stuff is not important. That there is nothing to achieve. Consciousness in its variety of forms will continue. There is no need to progress, no need to evolve. Consciousness exists. All the world exists as consciousness.
Our fathers found out the hidden light by the Truth in their thoughts, they brought birth to Dawn- Satya mantra. Sri Aurobindo. Explorations in Consciousness?. JK is right for the elite only.Goal is That in life, inevitably for Integral Self.
I think the interviewer was spot on when he said how do we do it when we all have jobs . If we were all JK and we all made it our life work to teach how to get to a place that can not be taught how to get there the world would stop working. I think his life work makes more sense now in 2024 as we move to a world that is being more and more controlled be A.I and as simulation games become more realistic we can use simulations to experience human conditioning , or the suffering of being human and when we have had enough we can give it up for a different state . Thank you for posting the video.
What an obnoxious interviewer. Props to JK for his patience.
interview not inerview
Western philosophers thought if we solve problems in our surroundings we can attain the ideal life and ideal society
So they have living in a logical and problem solving attitude and started inventing technologies and machines to make life easy
So that we live happy
But eastern philosophy is the problem raising from inner instability of people,
People who cant have hold on their desires and wanting will anyway find a way to exploit everything for their pleasures
Thats why eastern philosophy is more inverted, realisation of roots of problems and prevent it at there itself
Thinking and verbalizing is the 'old way'. He asks, 'who is it that is thinking and verbalizing?' :the "me", so he suggests "why think?". Be attentive. See yourself thinking, instead. Just look. One has to work at it. The conditioning is derailed.
But really though how many people are going to have the strength and discipline to achieve such a state and how many people are willing to give up there own individual happiness eg love , family , joys they have that do not harm others or live this life. I do respect JK but I think he may be to radical and could cause more harm than good .
Clarity..
aunque aveces tengo frio tomo leche y tengo pelo y la paso asi
Krishnamurthy speaks well but was he not in a privileged person, he was given the best of everything. As he himself says he never knew conflict.
Having no conflict does not depend on the circumstances around you. It is a state of mind ..... a state of mind in which there is no conflict no matter what the circumstances.
But he didn't fall for that privilege
Do you know how powerful the theosophical society of India at his times, that society was educated him to declare him as world teacher
But jk simply denied it
He seperated from society
He choose truth over everything else, though he had opportunity to represent both simultaneously he chosen to stick with only truth
Because he have seen power, popularity will corrupt mind
If I'm a light unto myself then what need have I for j Krishnamurti?
You need K to convince you that you can be the light to yourself. Once you are convinced you will be able to find the switch and turn it on.
Nuts of iron
Levin went gaga in later life.
beautiful give thought its right place then piece dominate , why should we carry burden ii out head and walk around, thought illusory but powerful, let thought follow you not o follow the thought , people always compare thought to a monkey, let tie the monkey and take instruction from you, if monkey is free, it will come stay on the head, we need technology science medicine, communication, but for the need only
i meant peace dominate
Does he think he is not egoistic?
No only u think that
Mater Oogway
Great questions by the interviewer. Exhibits Class 👌
Godi media anchors of today need to learn a thing or two from him!! 😂
Merit_Worthy; trying to feed this into AI topDown
20:40 circa ACTION nexusDescription_reView
Dear K's left hand, Parkinsons?
But men has duality. Source of conflicts
He's a good man, but a bit slippery. He's genuine I'm sure, but I wonder how he'd be if he wasn't so protected by wealth. Even so, the man with the strange hairstyle is a force for good.
In a video Q&A session he was asked how he supported himself. He claimed he had no money and "didn't want the stuff"; that all income went to the foundations who provided the daily necessities. When invited to speak, the sponsors met the costs.
@@dxf7665 He may not have had bank accounts with his name on them but he was supported financially and so could live a very comfortable life, yet claim to have no wealth. I wish I could be that poor. He could actually afford to live a life without conflict in day to day matters. Very few of us are that lucky. My point is, how would he have coped if he had to get his hands dirty like most of us do to earn our money. How does someone live an unblemished life in the modern world where compromises are a daily necessity.
when Jesus appeared to His followers after dying on the cross, one of the first things He did was to show them His scars.
“Look at my hands and my feet. It is I myself!”
Can't say I've seen anyone come back from the dead. Or ascend into heaven (wherever that may be).
The writers of our sacred books were illumined mystics, past masters in the art of psychology. In telling the story of the soul, they personified this impersonal principle in the form of a historical document both to preserve it and to hide it from the eyes of the uninitiated. Today, those to whom this great treasure has been entrusted, namely, the priesthoods of the world, have forgotten that the Bibles are psychological dramas representing the consciousness of man; in their blind forgetfulness, they now teach their followers to worship its characters as men and women who actually lived in time and space. When man sees the Bible as a great psychological drama, with all of its characters and actors as the personified qualities and attributes of his own consciousness, then - and then only - will the Bible reveal to him the light of its symbology.
@@agrikantus9422 Nor have I ever seen a soul. For all I know, neither have those who repeat such stories.
@@dxf7665 Feel free to believe whatever you want. I wish the best for you and a fulfilling life.
The interviewer is not right for this interview! He's not listening or incapable of understanding.
He didn't have any conflict with anyone because he didn't have to go through the hardships,challenges pains of household life, that matters a lot.
As the phrases goes
The finest steel goes through the hottest fire.
He didn't sit in the tests of life.
One could revert that he did not go through the hardship of life because he had no conflict. What do you think ?
may I say with due respect that he did not sit for the test because he had the wisdom to see the end result of it.
@@laurentdervaux3695
With due respect I want to say that there is huge difference between theory and practical.
Let me share with you a real life story. I used to attend Sunday class of a monk who didn't enter the family life. His life was dedicated to the world by educating the underprivileged children. His organisation is still working on so many projects of mass education and empowerment.
The ashram had a huge library that had books on all topics. And people loved to become the members of it
They listed out the elligible members and called. them for admission. But by mistake some new member were also called. Now they had limited seats to offer and numbers of students were five times more. The situation turned into a riot like situation because the other students were slso called. Now the same monk who used to talk about self awareness got scared as he could not handle the crowds. Though later the secretary assured the crowds that they will get admission in the next turn.
Therefore a wise man is he who always remain calm under all situations. Now the monk would hold discussion on self awareness, that was theoretical but how he behaved like a sacred man was his practical side. So people may behave wisely in one situation but not always in all tough situations. Without facing the trials and tribulations, hardships ,real life experiences, one can remain wise in words but not in actions
Moreover please read latest research of psychologists who conclude that saying great words and giving demonstration of those words is totally two different things.
Or please read a poem ' The brook" by lord Tenneson
@@makarandnidhalkar7139
I have given the same reply to other person. Please read it
@@laurentdervaux3695
There is a huge difference between theory and practical . Man can talk about wisdom but may not act wisely under though situation. Therefore hardships, challenges test our inner strength