Martingale System IMPROVED!
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 10. 2021
- The Martingale System works until you go broke. I have improved on the Martingale System, If you are not sure what the Martingale System is... Martingale System is a progressive betting system that requires you to double your bet when you lose to recoup your losses. Martingale System works great until you lose a bunch of hands in a row and you are faced with a big bet to recover your losses and go bust.
The Problems with the Martingale System
1. You end up betting this massive amount of money and losing or not willing to bet that massive amount.
2. You go broke because of a losing streak.
3. You max out the table limits.
How I addressed the Martingale System issues in my improved revision.
1. No more massive bets
2. You can withstand longer losing streaks and still win
3. You are betting smaller amounts never reaching the table limit.
Scotty makes his living online as a freelancer.
Hire Scott to do your social media: scottrasher.com/product/social...
Linkedin: / asherscott
Venmo: @scottyasher
CashApp: $handicappingwebsites
Paypal.me: paypal.me/scottyasher
email: mypenplease@gmail.com
Bear’s Instagram: / call4afreewinner
rum
Sir please delete this video I worry casino bane this stategy.. 100% profit this way..
HHHHHHHH GO HEAD warring them you can't asshole because we PLAY LIVE + it's 50/50 profit for long term and i you lucky in short term this man showing Martingale System witch is known global y to play safe in the last for who have low bank roll
😂😂😂😂😂
LOL first prove that this system wins consistently, then ask to delete it. Have you been winning with it?
Brother please 🙏🏻 replay me , it is working???
😂
When a person is playing at a casino he/she must understand that what ever money that was bet is already a lost, that is why there is such thing as "stop loss". The Martingale Betting System is only effective if you pair it with a game strategy (a strategy to whatever game you're playing) and if you win just win enough, don't get greedy. If there is a "stop loss" there is also a "stop win". Set these goals/mindset and you will be fine.
The only person that I have seen with this wisdom. Thank you.. Why is it that hard?
Very interesting way to bet place---especially in Baccarat. What great is that when you hit a win streak of 7 or 8 hands in a row--you convert all the columns from L to W--and all the Marty's go back at level 1 on that moderate win streak. On the flip side--as was said in the Video--a long losing streak doesn't wipe you out in 10 hands--and you've still got a decent chance to get your losses back as the game progresses and get out with a profit.
Never liked anyones video on youtube except this one. Its been working for me ever since i found it. i win and walk everytime..
:) nice!
Why in the hell did you pick a game with so many damned pushes? You could flipped a coin to make your case.
If a column is losing alot, you can just take the loss and move it to other winning columns to evenly disburse and cut the loss from growing significantly.
It doesn't always work that way. You can move to a column that has been winning and then it will start losing.
^ nailed it
I watched every minute of your video … thank you for your efforts
thanks for watchin dude!
Very cool strategy, appreciate you sharing it!
Thanks for watching!
Its very nice strategy of how to use martingale effectively.. thanks for this video sir.
Thanks for watching
Scotty, Thank you for taking the time to do this video, it is very interesting, I subscribed. My only question is have you considered somehow modifying it to roll over the win columns? Pressing the wins up to column 2 or 3, then resetting? Thanks again
it's an interesting angle forsure.
Just wanted to let you know I like the graft system, but you must recalculate your progression bets, ultimately your loss bet increase still leaves you behind.
Nice video, thanks.
I am also testing Martingale variations but applied to trading where I risk 1 to win 2, which allows me to "place more trades" sort of speak, plus I trade trends so that I can have an edge instead of relying just in luck.
Trends are good.
Dude I do the exact same thing 😂
I have done some testing of this with 30 columns. This makes it a lot less chance of getting in too deep. Spin 132 I was up 100 units and highest bet 31 units on 2 only. I continued progression from that point and by spin 317 was up 251 units and highest was 63 units on 2 spins. I used Super Martingale 1, 3, 7, 15, 31, 63 . So I think more colums to a certain point the better. One down side to use with live game you would not only have to track bets, but profits. Would work best with online. Perhaps to use a profit point to restart. 10 or 20 units maybe.
wow that's interesting! thanks
Hello! Do you continue using the strategy? How is it working? Thank you! @johnblyth9787
Anyone who gambles online gets EXACTLY what he or she deserves.
31:00 a $180 win does not clear all the losses in that column. Why not bet an amount large enough to break even or profit ? Eg 200+
Thanks for the video, I think this may help psychologically with applying a stop loss with Martingale which is difficult to do.
No prob!
You're right
Nice, it looks fun to play too, I am definitely going to experiment with this next time I play, tomorrow. I just play regular martingale for blackjack at home for no money, just do simulated casino sessions. It surprises me how rarely I get into trouble. I suppose there are other things that can throw a wrench into it in a real casino situation. I am someone with a lot of balls, so I don't think that would be a problem for me, but I can imagine when you hit the table limit and you want to switch tables or even casinos to carry on and bet even higher amounts to try and win your previous bets back that it could just throw you off. Going to a new table, maybe you'd start on a deck maybe where you are going to draw a series of hands that are even worse than at the previous table and you're starting at 3000 dollars. You have to pay a lot to buy into those kinds of games I would imagine also.
But to be honest, I'm dubious and suspicious of how vehement and how many people there are online yelling at you about how stupid Martingaling is. It makes me wonder if they aren't shills and Martingale is not that bad and maybe the casinos don't want too many people playing it. Of course you are betting a lot to win a little, but that just has to be accepted, as nonsesnsical as it may be, or if you don't accept it then don't play Martingale strategy. Or yes, of course you can lose ten in a row, well you need to have a large bankroll. if you don't have that, you should maybe card count or something.
I've never played blackjack at a casino, i would imagine they would not take kindly to using a pencil and paper to keep track of your Martingale columns, so it seems this is only for online betting, which I have a hard time trusting, it just seems too easy to simulate the cards and if a player starts winning they just could give him bad hands using a computer program that generates what looks like cards in an actual live beetting casino but which are only animations.
Probably the best betting system I’ve ever seen
thank you dude.
I've been making every strat into Marti(hollandish to Marti,Oscars grind to marti etc.) and found this awesome technique and now I have to drop everything and try this one ,thanks much Scotty
I'ma name this "GS KAGEBUNSHIN" means grand scotty shadow clones
Do you have a martingale for Craps ?
This actually works...i done a 7 colume stragety on baccarat.....works well man....well done...i subscribed because its awesome
Thank you dude!
What's your stop loss?
And how many wins do you need at least to collect your stop loss?
The standard Martingale strategy is mathematically impractical. As you said in this video. People don't realize how often black or red will hit 8-10 or more times in a row. If you're playing on a regular basis it's guaranteed to eventually happen. You lose all of your wins & leave the casino broke. The reverse Martingale makes more sense. And here we have a modified version of that.
how ever note the same applys. bitting up means you loss more when you loss and betting down after a loss means next to nothing. its the losss at the end that gets um
Something i noticed when using this strategy especially on online casino's they start targeting you and whenever you increase the bet on loosing column and ends up as the normal martingale. I noticed situations where one of the columns starts to grow and whenever you get to the column its always a loss irrespective of how you place your bet.
I guess this would be suitable when playing in a house casino not online.
yep most online casinos have algorithms that track your betting patterns. Ive found some that seem legit like Stake
Scotty , this is older video but I've been modifying and tinkering with this strategy a lot thanks!.. I basically each day have 5 columns and set the max at each column to 3. At the End of the Day I take whataver profit I get, or if it is a loss I let it be. Then start over the next day. So far overall up..
Nice!
Can I ask what game you are playing and for tips to keep track??
@@titoman0650 paper and pencil
@@titoman0650 Stack 1s
It took me awhile to get what you were whacking at lol I’m at min 14 of the video but now that I understand that makes a lot of sense
would it be smart to add a lost to all the winning columns and subtract it from the 660 so you can slowly clear the drawdown, instead of leaving it as a lost. You'll stop playing the 3rd column but you'll let the other 4 help reduce the lost over time. Overall great strategy.
The column that is huge. Spread it within the other columns
@@misspetit this is what i was saying above
I like this a lot since you know it well would the higher amount of rows you done better? Or is that more risky?
yes more rows is better, few guys have ran tests on this system in the comments... you can read what their finding have been.
I play a similar betting progression which allows me around 19 chances to recoup my losses with the martingale. with this system, you are playing if you get a loss every fifth spin will kill your bankroll, like spin #1,6,11,16,21,26,31, etc. or 2,7,12,17,22,27,32, etc. so be mindful of that in the example above., so the key here is to know where to place your bet and why you must know the why or you are simply guessing.
which betting progression do you play?
Which progression are u playing
I would like to see you use his while playing baccarat. With any system you like. And lets see how it turns out.
I just found this and I'm glad I did. I'm testing it out on baccarat and so far it's working great. I'm using a five step Grand Martingale (1 - 3 - 7 - 15 - 31) and if I bust out (which hasn't happened yet) I drop the column and replace it with a new one. I play until I hit my win target. Thanks!
P.S. I'm calling this the Martingale Grid. Sounds more impressive. :)
Good stuff
any update? still working well for you?
Any update. Are you still doing well with it?
How many columns do you use with it 5 or 10?
The column that keeps losing has higher and higher values accumulating at the bottom. So you win peanuts in the other columns, while the losing column will eat a whole chunk out of the profits. So no matter what the strategy, eventually the losses will be equal to, if not more than the profits. Guys, there is no strategy that can give you an edge over the 50-50 fair coin. Not even this one. Try this one out on a sheet of paper. At the end, add up all the profits & losses. You will find that the value of the profits will be equal to the value of the losses. Thank me later ;)
Agreed. I tried this and still went bankrupt because of the losing column.
@@throwaway4928 how many columns did u use
@@obouldakos 5
those folks who think they invented a strategy would gain so much from doing a bit of maths.
This is just a better version of martingalesystem. There is no System what can give you a 100% Chance to win all the Time. This version is actually interesting to use, because it minimizes the risk to double up into a bankrupt when you are getting into a long losingstreaks
Okay but you are eating all those loses until you finally win, so if you lost alot or even lets say two columns (games) reach 180 then you are already 554$ down in just those two alone, then youre screwed because your bankroll is gone. Youre risking not having enough to cover all these games at once. Its hard enough to cover one martingale game. Am i wrong?
Thank you for the time you put into this.
SO... Basically, you are Martingale-ing 5 instances (sessions), but instead of consecutive bets, it ends up being every 5th bet (or however number or sessions you run, which could still lose, but less likely? I Like it.
I still need a stop loss (which another series can make up) and a stop win to feel comfortable. Thanks again
Its not less likely. Same probability.
I have trouble seeing why and how the bet sequence is weighted. 5-12-25-55-100-180-350-660-1350-2700. Why 55 and not 50, aiming for a higher $13 profit instead of $5? The $180 bet is even a losing one with -$17. And then the bet sequence deteriorate even further the deeper we get. The $660 bet loses -$67. It doesn't make sense.
I believe the idea behind 55 not 50 is to give you a chance not to be chasing 5 if you win but also ensure that all the times you had lost you still get to win. Remember that when playing the martingale strategy when you loose and continue doubling at the end if you win you will only be winning the initial amount not the profit for each time you have place a bet. I have modified this even further as follows: 5-15-35-75-155-315-635-1275- 2555 where if you probably you win at 315 you;ll not be winning 5 but 30 to cover for all the spins where you had lost ensuring you always have a win.. His progression makes it possible to always have a win per spin not just chasing the initial losing amount.
So tried this over 50 hands of BJ. Started with 1000 start bet at 5. After 50 Hands of using this system total £937.50 -£62.50. Then 50 hands of normal martingale same betting. 50 hands. Finished £1070. £70 up.
Great video Scotty. Good plan. Sound advice. Have an idea. Instead of eliminating a column that gets to 6 losses from 10, why not set a stop loss limit of say 3. The reasoning is that eliminating a column of 6 losses totals 1,387. Divide that by 5 means you have to win 278 bets to recover your loss. Much easier to recover a loss of 42 ( 5+12+25) divided by 5 = approx 8 wins required. Yes, you'll get to 3 losses more often, but if those 6 losses had been 2x3 losses, then you'd only need to win 16 times to recover.
What you could do instead of writing up a Martindale column of 5 to 2,700. You could write up a Mini-Martindale column of 5 12 25. 5 12 25. 5 12 25, etc. No need to eliminate columns. Just make them longer in multiples of 3.
What are your thoughts, Scotty?
Great content! I will test this out. Much appreciated.
nice, lemme know how you do!
I used this strategy at the casino on the big 20 money wheel that the 5 pays 5 to 1 before I knew it was illegal in the casino. It worked for me like 10 times in a row when I went to Atlantic City. There was one time I hit the table limit so I left because it wouldn’t work at that point. The stock market doesn’t have limits or laws against it so as long as you have enough capital, it won’t fail.
how do you find a 1:1 50% in the stock market? price action is so erratic?
@@infraredxray This is not that hard if you use indicators, for example if the RSI is below some extreme condition like 10, more often than not you will win 80% of the time on a bet after that with a typical stop loss and take profit. This situation is very rare but it does happen. You could then in theory find other indicators with extremely rare situations and start to stack those together to get more opportunities and then probably use something like this well.
Trade Hedging 1.1, even when you lose, you win . It's better to break even then taking a lost. I don't care what direction the market goes. I cut my losses and keep add to my wins. 😮 trading the trending direction this is not roulette
@@infraredxrayenter and exit at order blocks
I would like to use this strategy for BlackJack but have one question. If I double down on my bet and lose, should I mark two losses on the same chart? I use basic strategy wich calls for alot of double downs and splits.
Scotty I believe you may have the closest thing I have seen to a winning system. Sufficient bank roll, nerves of steel and intestinal fortitude to match, this could almost not fail. A cent online game and $20 or so would be way to try. Also if you got in a little, amount could be split into 10 columns next round. A progression of 1, 2, 3, 7, 15, 31, 63 may work. Also if at any point you break even or up 1 or more units, restart. Thank you for your ideas. Certainly thinking outside the box.
Thank you dude! I won some money with it!
@The Baccologist Thank you, ive made some good money with it.
A WINNING SYSTEM IS NOT A PROGRESSIVE STRATEGY ONLY IT MUST BE PAIRED WITH KNOWLEDGE OR IT WILL FAIL. YOU MUST KNOW WHERE TO PLACE YOUR WAGER AND WHEN TO DO SO ALSO, YOU CAN NOT PLACE YOUR BET BLINDLY ON RED OR BLACK AND EXPECT THIS MATHEMATICAL SYSTEM TO SAVE YOU, CAUSE IN CANNOT,
@@scottybear hello what did The Baccologist say? I think he deleted his comment. I really want to know please. Maybe i cld use it to improve your strat. Ty!
@@nagmus887 dont really remember.
Do you make any profit or broke even when you cleared all the columns?
Hope for the best
thanks
When you won $100 you were supposed to recover 55+25 only. Which there still left 12+5 not recovered yet.
Which I believe will make your strategy better. To not worry about losing profits. If you read my comment i hope you make a video again with my suggestion.
Can you please remake this video so I can understand it more clear. I really don't understand what your doing. Maybe play another game where there are no pushes and you can bet the actual amount your saying. I'd really appreciate it
at 5:14, you said that with Martingale, "in order to win, you bet more when you are winning, and then bet the minimum amount when you are losing"... did you just mis-speak on that? I always thought it was to double bet on losses, and go back to minimum after a win.
yes I made some mistakes in the video, but I felt like it was still good enough to publish
Martingale won't work in anything that has an edge against you. Let's say it's roulette and the edge is an even 5% and your first bet on red is 1$. The series would be 1, 2, 4, 8,16, 32. By the time it's $32 you're still only going to make $1profit if you win, if there was no edge, but because there IS a 5% house edge, what's 5% of $32? It's $1.60. In the long term, every time you bet $32 to make $1 you're also losing $1.60 to the house, so even though you win you really lose 60 cents. The $32 bet just shows the most clearly how the house edge will beat you long term, but it will beat you even on the lower bets, just not as dramatically, more grindingly. What's really happening is that it's the same as flat betting the average of your long term martingale bets. It would average out to about $3 per bet so it's the same as flat betting $3 and you losing 15 cents every time. It's the same if you increase by lower amounts than double, it's still the average of whatever the series is. The only way you can ever win in a casino is if you hit a jackpot in slots early on and then never go to the casino again.
That if you're running trades back to back...
In forex with proper risk management it works consistently 💯
I suppose if the price levels were wide enough that the spread/commissions were a very small percentage of the average return per series. Exchanges are just way too greedy for most systems to be profitable.@@quintonnkoane9885
Not true whatsoever I’m up in blackjack over 5k in a month using martingale but I only martingale to a certain point around 4 losses i a row max
Interesting, but 1 month is still a relatively short test. Somebody would have noticed if Martingale worked in blackjack before you did by now wouldn't they? I'll try it in a demo though, thanks for mentioning it.@@slideman1249
if someone is dumb enough to play double zero roulette, they deserve to lose their money😂😂
How much do you suggest bankroll to be if you ran 5 columns? And what about 10?
maybe a 1000 bucks, you can run 10 columns... the more you run the lower the risk posting larger bets
How do you keep track of these columns inside a casino?
I bring a cheat sheet
Interesting system, but you need to adjust your bets. At the 180 level and above you are actually losing money on your win. the 180 doesn't cover the 197 you bet previously in that column. at the 350 level you would have bet 377 in that column.
thank you!
Mind-blowing strategy to reduce risk bro!!
go win some money!
You have to bet '× 1.5 (or double bet + half bet) or triple or more after losses to win back profit. Now, the stacking adds up quickly
yes!
THANK YOU SIR... you're a genius!!! ive been playing online casino apps, and lost many times...using martingale system, losing 8 streak is already bad and i cant afford to lose more money...and there is something like a user limit per bet similar to table limit..., so with this system of yours i have better chance not losing easily.., i will be trying this.. thanks
lemme know how you do! Good luck out there. Win some money
Update?. Hehehe
@@nagmus887 still i lost because the app is rigged, martingale is very risky even if the site is not rigged.
@@erwinubaldo1836 hahaha. Have you tried it with online casino?
@@nagmus887 if you have a bankroll that can makes marty upto 12 losses, you might survive and win that lossing column
First time trying this on roulette and it has gone horribly, unfortunately. Every large bet I did seemed to lose, so I ended up with lots of small wins but lots of big losses. I guess that's just the luck of the draw. I may tweak things and try again but just wanted to let everyone know that this isn't foolproof. It's still very easy to lose your money with this strategy.
How did your subsequent sessions go?
@@budman-tw6rr not well, unfortunately. It was just more of the same bad luck when it came to the big bets.
Can i ask where you got your multiples from? Its not doubled or trippled, it seems randome that you chose 5-12-25-55-etc.? Thats the last thing i need to figure out before i can list out my own games and try it myself.
Yea I asked that myself because from 100 to 180 you would make minus even if you won the 180 bet -> you spend 197 before reaching the point of betting 180. that doesn’t make sense to me..
Ok so what if you have a column that keeps losing instead of eliminating it take those losses and put them in the other columns so now instead of betting $5 in columns 1 2 4 or whatever you're betting $12 in those columns
maybe... try it and see if it works
@@ThanhNguyen-qs3ct thats a good idea as well.
Very interesting. 250 spins in euro roulette and up 230 units using 1-3-7-…grand M. Have had to make the 63 unit bet six times and the 127 twice. Seems to put it up to random luck. I like the idea of not making the 127 bet and spreading it to make back the 121 loss.
Any strategy is best used when you set a profit target and a stop loss. Looking forward to testing it to 10,000 spins and see what happens. Thanks for this innovative twist!
goodluck, comeback and tell me how you did
How's it going?
So essentially you are playing 5 collums with 5 sets of buy ins. You are just delaying the inevitable of making that 5,6,7 martingale bets. Now you can set a limit and not bet beyond five losses which will save you from the huge bets. If I come in with 5 sets of buys in of course I will not be afraid to bet infact I would bet it to the 10 hands knowing I have 4 more buy ins to play with.
hey, i tested this, i played at a local casino while playing BJ. my gf kept score on her phone, i used a 15 bar version and instead of eliminating columns when i reach 80 euros, i just keep playing 80 until i win, instead of going up to 160. it worked and we made 300 euros profit. i tested it on my phone many times and it seems there is some kind of statistical advantage.
May I know what's the martingale progression you're using? You stopped at 80 euros which is how many level?
@@vincentang6695 either bank roll 300 - 5,10,20,40 or 500 - 10,20,40,80. Most of the money is made when you double down or split. Sometimes this system just keeps me in the same place. But I rarely lose more than I'm making. When the 40s stack up too much I prefer to start a fresh start
@@kith4312 Thank you very much for the explanation. Will test it out.
@@vincentang6695 you're welcome, I should increase increments like he said I'm the video to speed up the process. I have only been testing for a few days. I managed to make a few hundreds with this method though. It's important that you stop and take frequent breaks if you see profit and start over later. As it can become exhausting
Do u think that the most likely place to run this system successfully is the roulette, choosing or always red or always black? Because it is 50/50 stake (if u don’t count with the green) and the most losses u have, most likely it will be to get a win in the next one, and for that reason that should prevent us to enter a massive losing streak. Greetings from Portugal
anything 50/50
I’ll just use the first 10 mins thanks 🙏🏼
thanks
@@scottybear could this be used on live at the casino blackjack table
@@troyeastman9500 thats a good idea, are you going to try it?
11:30 got a little confusing kinda made no sense jumbled things and changed wins and losses
yes true... it was such a good video I have to keep it even if it had some mistakes. :(
Will this work on football over1.5 goals around half time when the odds around the evens
good idea
I am completely confused lol! Can you run that by us again?
What's your stop loss?
And how many wins do you need at least to collect your stop loss?
I don’t do stop losses
Do you have a 1 page simple scorecard for this made up to play 70-80 hands in a shoe
?
no sorry I dont
The odds of winning 20 times in a row on even money bets with a 2.7% VIG is 625,124 to one. RIDICULOUS! Just try to win a couple in a row over and over again.
Thanks for your comment!
Excellent video. I'm going to try this out with Binary Options for Forex. In that case it is actually possible to gain an edge by trading currency pairs that are trending and only taking trades in the direction of the dominant trend.
Also with trading you can set daily profit and loss targets so for example if I'm down $500 on a red day I call it quits but maybe my winning days are $1000. So even if there are a few bad days here and there over time with an edge it should be profitable.
Does it work?
@@jonathanfigueroa2892 Kind of. It definitely keeps you going longer but I had the feeling that I was just drawing out the inevitable.
It still has the same pitfalls as the regular martingale strategy where you end up getting unlucky in one particular column and getting blown up. I was using it on a shorter timeframe (30 second) chart to test it rapidly but your edge as a trader there is almost nonexistant because you're getting stopped out by market noise. It's basically a coinflip and we know what can happen with those.
I'd like to try it again on a longer timeframe, like the 5min chart and see how it does.
@@ghost9pm407 let me know what are the results for longer timeframe
@@jonathanfigueroa2892 You're welcome to try as well. It's easy to start. I use a service called PocketOption. They have a phone app as well as a website and they have a free demo account. It's fun to mess around with.
I am trying the same but with crypto futures also using trend trading as an edge and 1:2 RR.
Is there any good way to memorize this, so it would be more usefull in casinos?
Great system for online casinos!
you can take a small sheet of paper to the table with you, the casino welcomes system players
@@scottybear OK that's interesting! Didn't knew that.
Might gonna try this! Thanks sir^^
@@comics_from_the_vault no problem! Good luck
Im thinking of doing a sheet that is laminated, and some couple of dry erase markers and a small bag of wipes out to do the trick !!!
@@subsea8559😀That may be a bit much. Paper in pencil. Have you tired it?
I am using this for trading...works like a charm.
forex?
@@stevezm100 binary options. Just pick a decent strategy that gives you 40% win rate or more. The only difference is I don't let a leg in this system run more than 5 rows and I sometimes skip a column is running away until I find the best possible set up for that column. I haven't tried it on my forex account yet.
@@georgeavino7153 10 legs/columns?
I was thinking the same for trading indices but the thing there is the commissions and also no the stops and targets would have to be the same everytime, which because of volatility changes everytime. I thought of binary options too but when you win you win less percentage and most of the sites are rigged, right?
now there's a thing similar to binary on CME futures for calling if price would close above or below certain threshold
@@georgeavino7153I was thinking the same for trading indices but the thing there is the commissions and also no the stops and targets would have to be the same everytime, which because of volatility changes everytime. I thought of binary options too but when you win you win less percentage and most of the sites are rigged, right?
now there's a thing similar to binary on CME futures for calling if price would close above or below certain threshold
Let something hit 4 times in a row then go on the color
If you really want just do 20 columns. It's safer.
Do you have sample on this that is much easier to learn? I mean much more basic.
I have this: czcams.com/video/Jic9ww_5aL8/video.html
@@scottybear alright thanks!
@@GamersUnityPH No Prob!
If i cant net profit at least equal to the total invested ammount at any given step i dont bet at all. It wont worth it. It doesnt work with every kind of bet therefor at least that i net profit the ammount of the bet of that hand
How many times have you tried this?
many, and have tested over and over. it works well
Also what games does this work best on? Blackjack? Roulette? Baccarat?
I feel it works well with anything near 50/50 outcome.
Baccarat
@@brianteskey2425 yes!!
@@scottybear No, "near" is not enough. You still need a player advantage to beat the Casino. Betting progressions itself cannot overcome House advantage, no matter how constructive they are. (You should know that as a former Casino Dealer).
@@kristofferkarlsson4260 so u think this is not that good strategy? do u have any sir
Kinda interesting! I’m going to try this using backlogs, a python aplication and calculate the possibilities. Cheers from Brazil.
yeah lemme know.
Following
@@comics_from_the_vault Thank you dude!
what did you find? quais foram os resultados?
If i add des too my strategy i tink it will be d best strategy ever
that's great! tell me about it.
Martingale was a casino owner. Winning strategy? I dont think so, dont do it! There are much better bet progressions
oh, you didn't watch the vid. thanks for your comment tho.
will it work to red & white game were the winning rate is x1.95?
not sure what that even is.
Way too many pushes, this game is stupid. Bacarat seems better for this? Interesting stuff though what's preventing a particular column from losing like 10 in a row? Just betting bankers and doubling your bet every loss has the same chance as using multiple columns. Meaning usually you win, but get wiped out if you play long enough. No reason you'd have a better chance of not losing 7+ in a row with 1 column or multiple. I will test this out see how it goes
yes the game moved too slow
hello sir , I am student , Does this strategy work? Do u have any other Strategy than that?
It works! But it's a risk... If it was 100% I would be millionaire
@@scottybear sir can you tell me which sport should i choose to Bet using this martingale strategy?
is USA football good option than Soccer?
i find normal SOCCER hard bcoz there are 50 chances of Match Draw...
Need your Genuine Advice on this 🙏🙏🙏
PAI Gow? Why not use a Wheel to demo with?
That is definitely a good idea.
What I don’t get is why sometimes you more than double I.E the first 3. Then you under double the bets from 55 to 100 to 180 to 350 and so on. Care to explain your reasoning behind this?
Kicking the loss can down the road I think. BUT... maybe we'll make some money and die before that day comes! lol
Look at a much simpler version that i just created. I posted it 5 minutes ago.
@@CarschA what version?
@@rodrigopetrus1978 Look for another post i made here and you'll find it.
i ran up $70 to $1200 in like 15 hours of play. Then lost 13 hands in a row and lost everything. Betting $1 hands martingale system
Hard to beat a streak of 13 straight losses
I had similar results using 5 columns. Ran 30 to 957 then started hitting many big losses down to zero. I was using stops at +3 units and stop after a 6th level loss.
Thats nuts! 😆 After 15 hours up $1200 you should have left, but got greedy. Probably sleepwalked it away 😴
Anyone tried this with binary options playing with the trend?
should do that.
What percentage of your total bankroll is your base bet and how many bets does it take like this to double up in a day on average would you say?
I just start with the $5 unit.
Im so confused on your chart?? I dont get the logic here. Idk if its bc Im not familiar with the game youre playing. So, when and how are you updating your chart?
So, after 5 wins (or 7, however many columns you have) you move on to the next higher bet? Or you just martingale on lets say for example the 4th bet until you reach another win? At 17:35 you finally take a loss, then you start your chart back over on the 1st column? I dont know when you move on to the next higher bet. At 19:10 you take another couple losses but then you start at the 5th column? I really wish I understood... lol. I want to try this on baccarat but need some more guidance
No worries thanks for watching and leaving a comment.
o yea gonna beat the casino now
Is there any system on baccarat we can play with this betting sequence?
You can use it on baccarat
@@scottybear which system to play ?
Have you got any please ?
@@elioe2776 yup the video shows
@@scottybear Yes I watched whole video, I mean you haven’t show on baccarat how it’s work which strategy to play it on baccarat.
Thanks
Martingale is insanity.
Lol...just eliminate the column?!?!?! Why don't you spread it to the other columns?
I think it will work better with soccer.
3 odds
Good idea!!
No real reason to use any version of a marty since there are many better progressions available.
Please tell me about other strategies....
What better progressions?
What a time consuming demo - with all the pushes, Pai Gow is a terrible choice to use for illustration purposes!
Yes, I should have used the wheel
Next time you should use Baccarat to demonstrate these systems. That way you're not pushing all the time. Better odds too.
yes it would move the video along faster.
Can you apply this strategy to game called aviator please. To win at 2x or loose gameplay
dont know, im not really a gamer
That's what I play, but there is a different martingale strategy... if you lose 2 in a row (both under 2x) you sit out and don't bet again until you see >2.0, then continue your progression. If you win you go back to betting 1 unit. E.g. Bet 1, lose. Bet 2 units, lose again... sit out until the next >2.0, then bet 4 units, then 8 units... then sit out again. Until you get a win, then go back to 1 unit. My first 4 bets are martingale, then fibonacci for 5th and 6th bets (add previous 2 bets). 5th or 6th win, go back to 3rd or 4th. If i lose 6 I'm out, start over. Won't go broke at least. I've found it works reasonably well, you can avoid those long streaks of under 2.0x.. since you sit out after 2 in a row. But once in a while you can lose all 6.
@@tqsuited
How many bets you must win in a day to collect your stop loss?
For example if you're willing to risk $1000, how many bets you have to win to collect the money you're risking?
My god please 🙏🏻 tell me this is working or not ,, and tell me How much limit put in App
It works well!
@@scottybear my God it works Dragon tiger 🙏🏻
Sir...Do u use this in Sports Betting ??🤔🤔
If Not ?
Then plz make video on Soort Betting also??
I used it mostly on sports betting, but it dont make for a great demonstration on a video.
@@scottybear Sir i am new Sport Betting...
Should i use this strategy in Sports Betting As a Beginner...
Need your Advice🙏🙏
@@dailyuse8654 I've done well with it... but its gambling so be careful.
@@scottybear thx for advice👍
I tested this system out on Baccarat, Craps, and Roullette. I did the best with craps 6/8 place bets and just doubling with each loss. Once I went up 5% on my bankroll, I would immediately restart. I have not lost yet. Might just have found my golden goose. Thank you!
i've done well with it.
@Brian Still you need a player advantage, to beat the House. Otherwise, it is just a a matter of time until you go broke. 11 days is nothing, test it out for 6 months at least.
@@kristofferkarlsson4260 bacarrat is 50/50 ?? Right
No house Adv
are u still making profit?
@@dailyuse8654 I no longer live in the US
The Martingale system is not a good system at all to use in Roulette machines. The House has 2 advantages.
1. '0'
2. 'Maximum Bet'
The house can throw a 0 in the play, meanwhile you're already on a running loss with your bank roll by now, and then there's the Maximum Bet... You've reached the betting limit fast from all the doubling up and absolutely f'cked by that point.
A helping the algo comment
Thanks!!! It helped!
Casinos have table min and max limits that prevent you to keep doubling. This system will fail and when it does you lose your entire bankroll.
Ah, you didn’t watch the video