đ Trade with our Sponsor Broker: Trade Nation www.financial-spread-betting.com/ccount/click.php?id=95 Trade sensibly! 81.7% of retail investors lose money. đ We are seeking more contributors who can produce great video educational content about trading for our channel. If you think you have what it takes please get in touch by sending a message to traderATfinancial-spread-betting.com (remove the AT and substitute by @). đ It seems a lot of our viewers are non-subscribers. Make sure to subscribe to our youtube channel as we upload regular videos! If you hit the âBellâ icon (đ) you will receive a notification on youtube every time that we upload a video on our channel. Bell icon hitters are super fans of our channel đ„°
you double on every winning position and end up losing one trade, clearing all wins and entering a loss...... I dont see the point!!! sounds good in theory but not practcal
Nice set of videos first of all, quite fair and logical tips. About the Anti-Martingale: it's nice way of thinking. I would suggest the following: 1. Use it intraday and restart it on the next day (or week if it's swing trading strategy). So if you get a good streak on that day you will keep it. Otherwise at some point with such big stakes you will loose everything and will go to square one which is also demotivating as blowing your account with Martingale. 2. I would risk a little bit less when I am winning like if I won the first trade I will risk 1.5 units on the second, then I will risk 2 units on the third trade (1 + 1.5 + 2) = 4.5. If you get a forth trade with lot size 4 and you lost it, you will end up at least with 0.5 units winning for the day. 3. When you are on loosing streak probably it's good to have clear stop like after the third loosing order, stop trading for the day.
I have a martingale system that has allowed me to pay off my home. If you have a true system that is backtested to win majority of the time and lose big very seldom, odds are you can make some great money. The key is paying off what you can instead of thinking it will work forever. Eliminate bills. Succeed. Remember, you can only lose what you started with to consider yourself failed. You can build great wealth with a great system. Just get out before it's too late. Focus on paying a car or house off first. It can't be a random luck martingale system. It has to be a backtested martingale system.
this anti martingale strategy has a potential of wiping out all the consecutive wins you just made with one bad âtimingâ trade because of âgreedâ of doubling up after winning. On the other hand martingale is like revenge trading where you try to win back all the losses you just made âbutâ it only takes 1 good trade in a series to win. if you couple martingale with a high win rate entry, it puts the odds in your favor. Both will be capital intensive, since you double everytime, the stakes gets bigger. antimartingale just needs 1 bad trade to loose it all while martingale just needs 1 good trade to win it all. its a choice or a no choice and not do either.... hmmm
Good but needs some tweeking. This is optimal based on streaking, but for the 'toilet seat' eg) win then lose then win twice then lose, it is not that optimal. I think the banking should begin after 2 in a row and extended only if 'in practice' there tends to be longer 'streaks'
I use martingale since 3 years but i do not multiply by 2 you need to do the math and you need back testing to find the best multiplier and best time frame and every when you should buy (example: if the position loose 15 pips then buy again). You guys need to spend time trying all currencies all time frames and every how many pips you should buy again and how much is the take profit. Plus you need to be safe even if the market fall 3000 pips. So martingale is goob but you need to think and do updates
For those punters looking for consistent Even Money bets in soccer, go to Goal Range, 2-3 goals. Odds are nearly always 2.0. If you're following the Euros 24. Here's the stats. 48 matches in total, only 2 matches left. Of the 46 matches played, 27 of them finished 2-3 Goal Range. 19 matches lost. This means on Level Betting you would be 8 points up. No need for Martindale or anti-Martindale. Good luck!
The anti martingale I think might be useful for the losses. Most traders who lose once end up on a long losing streak due to psychology of feeling bad and wanted to making up gains quickly, so the cutting position in half til you get the hang of it again can reduce a lot of losses. I'm not sure about the doubling on winning because one loss will wipe out all the gains from all your wins. May need some adjustment to that
How about just simply not doubling after the first win? Bank your original sum. Then double every time you win but have a cash out set, say after 5wins. Win or lose you start again with the first sum.
I think the benefit here is when you are on a losing streak, but there isn't anything different about your trade set up, entry, exit, stop loss placement etc, (your strategy and analyses methodology), doubling down can keep you in the game for less skin at risk - thus, psychologically, it can help and give you time to get yourself back on track - especially when markets are behaving 'strangely'... and if you are on a winning streak, perhaps because markets are behaving logically again, (like correlations moving back into line), then its not just you who recognises this, and thus its likely the market will accelerate in the same direction for an extended period of time, then it makes sense to add to the positions and even double up...
the martingale strategy works great in sim- not so well in live trading. this anti martingale strategy is not much better. it would be better to open a position with example 5 contracts, every time it makes a pullback from a new higher high add 4 then 3 then 2 then 1 contract. this way your average cost will be below your stop which is behind each swing low. that way when you do get stopped out you have profit. the anti martingale your average price is way to close to current price and when you get stopped out you have a loss. eh.
Doulbing after the first bar of a âthree bar playâ might be worth it on a catalyst but after that, itâs too much risk of going back to zero from a x4+ bet.
I think scaling into positions via ladder oerderring is the smartest way to trade, and you can add to winning trades as long as youâre setting a break even stop to your initial trade thus youâre only risking your initial size. Iâll definitely be putting some videos out about this, but the title of your video caught my attention, so nice job. Unfortunately any form of Martin Gail is not going to be solid risk management. Thatâs not to say that you canât come up pretty quick bye using that strategy. Might not be a bad choice for new traders. You just have to place your trades on the chart strategically and make sure youâre not using too high of sizing, taking into account that price will be running against you. Good luck traders.
Thanks for the feedback. If you are able to create some videos outlining your experience we would be happy to publish them on this channel as well if we find them relevant.
What if you 3x your bet instead of doubling it? Bet $0.50 - Lose. Bet $1.50 - Lose. Bet $4.50 - Lose .Bet $13.50 -Win ===== $27 won - $20 bet = $7 Profit. Then RESTART back at $0.50 again.
How does it not work? The math was simply explained although you can probably go to town with the math if you are curious enough. If a trader loses, he (or she) only loses realized profits which puts you back to square one. If he (or she) wins, then profits amplify. It's not going to be guaranteed profit but it's a smarter approach to managing risk and profits.
May I ask which betting system combined with different strategy and trend are the best in the long run ( Martingale System Fibonacci System d'Alembert System Cancellation System Paroli System Oscar's System) please?
This is worst than martingale, you doubling up the winning and when the higher lot loss all your winning will turn into loss. This guy is maybe an anti trader, and more into broker side :D
My philosophy in the stock market is that every stock will eventually go to $0. Some socks will last longer than others, but eventually the shares become worthless. Only the metals work differently because precious metals will always have value if you by the metal itself.
Interesting philosophy! And I have to partly agree with you as very few stocks keep going up for decades on end. But then there's also the statistic that 90% of businesses fail. And it is not just stocks but also currencies. Virtually all currencies lose value over time.
@@ukspreadbetting you also must consider that stocks can become worthless even though the company continues to operate successfully. They simple issue new shares. United Airlines, and Kmart have done this.
All these fail theory , best theory is based on management with total amount plus number of trades plus period of time plus based on profit against loss, this is the best strategy, i have so many formulas to trade with strong management
I use a strategy as in first bet if maket is going up i put 1 and if it goes well above and suddenly jumps down then i am doubling my money otherwise i will make the same trade again
This is even worse at blackjack. Chances are a big card helped you win. After a succession of wins, itâs more likely that big cards have been played and removed from the deck. This means that you will be raising your bet when the house has a bigger advantage. But playing other games where future events canât be predicted by past outcomes, your rate of loss will be exactly the same as the martingale or another other betting strategy. Your loss will always be the house percentage times the amount of your bets.
Completely useless.You start by 1 unit and win,then double it 2 and win and the double it 4 and win and then double it 8 and loose.So finally 1+2+4=7 win and 8 lost,you can make the next maths.!!!!!!!
Silly system. Win 1, win 2, win 4, win 8. Next bet 16. It loses 16 and wipes out your 15 profits. At this point, you're -1. So, having had a winning streak of 4 and not making any profits, you embark up betting 1/2. then 1/4 then 1/8 then 1/16! Stupid staking plan!
Johnny itâs called a hanging ârâ. Certain areas of the northeast United States use it as well when a word ends in a vowel and the next words begins in a vowel
đ Trade with our Sponsor Broker: Trade Nation www.financial-spread-betting.com/ccount/click.php?id=95 Trade sensibly! 81.7% of retail investors lose money.
đ We are seeking more contributors who can produce great video educational content about trading for our channel. If you think you have what it takes please get in touch by sending a message to traderATfinancial-spread-betting.com (remove the AT and substitute by @).
đ It seems a lot of our viewers are non-subscribers. Make sure to subscribe to our youtube channel as we upload regular videos! If you hit the âBellâ icon (đ) you will receive a notification on youtube every time that we upload a video on our channel. Bell icon hitters are super fans of our channel đ„°
you double on every winning position and end up losing one trade, clearing all wins and entering a loss...... I dont see the point!!! sounds good in theory but not practcal
Nice set of videos first of all, quite fair and logical tips.
About the Anti-Martingale:
it's nice way of thinking. I would suggest the following:
1. Use it intraday and restart it on the next day (or week if it's swing trading strategy). So if you get a good streak on that day you will keep it. Otherwise at some point with such big stakes you will loose everything and will go to square one which is also demotivating as blowing your account with Martingale.
2. I would risk a little bit less when I am winning like if I won the first trade I will risk 1.5 units on the second, then I will risk 2 units on the third trade (1 + 1.5 + 2) = 4.5. If you get a forth trade with lot size 4 and you lost it, you will end up at least with 0.5 units winning for the day.
3. When you are on loosing streak probably it's good to have clear stop like after the third loosing order, stop trading for the day.
I have a martingale system that has allowed me to pay off my home. If you have a true system that is backtested to win majority of the time and lose big very seldom, odds are you can make some great money. The key is paying off what you can instead of thinking it will work forever. Eliminate bills. Succeed. Remember, you can only lose what you started with to consider yourself failed. You can build great wealth with a great system. Just get out before it's too late. Focus on paying a car or house off first. It can't be a random luck martingale system. It has to be a backtested martingale system.
I've used this technique anti-martingale, and I've even sold out early because I saw that wasn't going carry in direction I thought it would.
absolutely love anti-martingale for the over 1.0 goals market in sports betting
This strategy is very useful, but on one condition, you must return to the first condition after three consecutive wins and do not double again.
this anti martingale strategy has a potential of wiping out all the consecutive wins you just made with one bad âtimingâ trade because of âgreedâ of doubling up after winning. On the other hand martingale is like revenge trading where you try to win back all the losses you just made âbutâ it only takes 1 good trade in a series to win. if you couple martingale with a high win rate entry, it puts the odds in your favor. Both will be capital intensive, since you double everytime, the stakes gets bigger. antimartingale just needs 1 bad trade to loose it all while martingale just needs 1 good trade to win it all. its a choice or a no choice and not do either.... hmmm
Good but needs some tweeking. This is optimal based on streaking, but for the 'toilet seat' eg) win then lose then win twice then lose, it is not that optimal. I think the banking should begin after 2 in a row and extended only if 'in practice' there tends to be longer 'streaks'
I use martingale since 3 years but i do not multiply by 2 you need to do the math and you need back testing to find the best multiplier and best time frame and every when you should buy (example: if the position loose 15 pips then buy again).
You guys need to spend time trying all currencies all time frames and every how many pips you should buy again and how much is the take profit.
Plus you need to be safe even if the market fall 3000 pips.
So martingale is goob but you need to think and do updates
Update plz are you still martingaling or wiped out
For those punters looking for consistent Even Money bets in soccer, go to Goal Range, 2-3 goals. Odds are nearly always 2.0. If you're following the Euros 24. Here's the stats. 48 matches in total, only 2 matches left. Of the 46 matches played, 27 of them finished 2-3 Goal Range. 19 matches lost. This means on Level Betting you would be 8 points up. No need for Martindale or anti-Martindale. Good luck!
The anti martingale I think might be useful for the losses. Most traders who lose once end up on a long losing streak due to psychology of feeling bad and wanted to making up gains quickly, so the cutting position in half til you get the hang of it again can reduce a lot of losses.
I'm not sure about the doubling on winning because one loss will wipe out all the gains from all your wins. May need some adjustment to that
How about just simply not doubling after the first win?
Bank your original sum.
Then double every time you win but have a cash out set, say after 5wins.
Win or lose you start again with the first sum.
I think the benefit here is when you are on a losing streak, but there isn't anything different about your trade set up, entry, exit, stop loss placement etc, (your strategy and analyses methodology), doubling down can keep you in the game for less skin at risk - thus, psychologically, it can help and give you time to get yourself back on track - especially when markets are behaving 'strangely'... and if you are on a winning streak, perhaps because markets are behaving logically again, (like correlations moving back into line), then its not just you who recognises this, and thus its likely the market will accelerate in the same direction for an extended period of time, then it makes sense to add to the positions and even double up...
the martingale strategy works great in sim- not so well in live trading. this anti martingale strategy is not much better. it would be better to open a position with example 5 contracts, every time it makes a pullback from a new higher high add 4 then 3 then 2 then 1 contract. this way your average cost will be below your stop which is behind each swing low. that way when you do get stopped out you have profit. the anti martingale your average price is way to close to current price and when you get stopped out you have a loss. eh.
By keeping risk low and some other things, it is possible to use it :)
Great video and well explained, anti martingale can lead to an early day if employed correctly with the right strategy.
Doulbing after the first bar of a âthree bar playâ might be worth it on a catalyst but after that, itâs too much risk of going back to zero from a x4+ bet.
This strategy might work in SOME systems, but not in all of them, especially the ones when your betting is based on pure gambling.
I think scaling into positions via ladder oerderring is the smartest way to trade, and you can add to winning trades as long as youâre setting a break even stop to your initial trade thus youâre only risking your initial size. Iâll definitely be putting some videos out about this, but the title of your video caught my attention, so nice job. Unfortunately any form of Martin Gail is not going to be solid risk management. Thatâs not to say that you canât come up pretty quick bye using that strategy. Might not be a bad choice for new traders. You just have to place your trades on the chart strategically and make sure youâre not using too high of sizing, taking into account that price will be running against you. Good luck traders.
Thanks for the feedback. If you are able to create some videos outlining your experience we would be happy to publish them on this channel as well if we find them relevant.
oh wow...nice. Anti-Martingale strategy. Never would have thought.This has inspired me. Thanks alot for the simple explanation!
What if you 3x your bet instead of doubling it? Bet $0.50 - Lose. Bet $1.50 - Lose. Bet $4.50 - Lose .Bet $13.50 -Win ===== $27 won - $20 bet = $7 Profit. Then RESTART back at $0.50 again.
Hahaha
I believe the odds are, you'll just lose your money faster.
Mark, have you used this sizing strategy before to grow a small account into a large one?
I can make any strategy look good on the paper. Show me a real trading accout that profits using anti-martingale, dude.
This guy is too smart
it dosen't works for long run, end up you will found that you didn't win any money but pay for a high risk, no point, it will wasted your time.
That's why after winning enough streaks probably about 3 you go back to 1 for safety.
How does it not work? The math was simply explained although you can probably go to town with the math if you are curious enough. If a trader loses, he (or she) only loses realized profits which puts you back to square one. If he (or she) wins, then profits amplify. It's not going to be guaranteed profit but it's a smarter approach to managing risk and profits.
No it will not waste your time only wiped your capital
May I ask which betting system combined with different strategy and trend are the best in the long run ( Martingale System
Fibonacci System
d'Alembert System
Cancellation System
Paroli System
Oscar's System) please?
Floaters is the main problem in all EAs, then it reduces the accumulated profits.
This is worst than martingale, you doubling up the winning and when the higher lot loss all your winning will turn into loss. This guy is maybe an anti trader, and more into broker side :D
My philosophy in the stock market is that every stock will eventually go to $0. Some socks will last longer than others, but eventually the shares become worthless. Only the metals work differently because precious metals will always have value if you by the metal itself.
Interesting philosophy! And I have to partly agree with you as very few stocks keep going up for decades on end. But then there's also the statistic that 90% of businesses fail. And it is not just stocks but also currencies. Virtually all currencies lose value over time.
@@ukspreadbetting you also must consider that stocks can become worthless even though the company continues to operate successfully. They simple issue new shares. United Airlines, and Kmart have done this.
Thanks for this video!
All these fail theory , best theory is based on management with total amount plus number of trades plus period of time plus based on profit against loss, this is the best strategy, i have so many formulas to trade with strong management
this is a way to delete all your winnings with a single loss.
I'm risking 2% of my capital in one trade. This is my anti-martingale.
Have you wiped your account or still trading right now đ
I use a strategy as in first bet if maket is going up i put 1 and if it goes well above and suddenly jumps down then i am doubling my money otherwise i will make the same trade again
you own the internet
this doesn't work at all, i tried it with 6 different games.
THANK YOU
This is even worse at blackjack. Chances are a big card helped you win. After a succession of wins, itâs more likely that big cards have been played and removed from the deck. This means that you will be raising your bet when the house has a bigger advantage. But playing other games where future events canât be predicted by past outcomes, your rate of loss will be exactly the same as the martingale or another other betting strategy. Your loss will always be the house percentage times the amount of your bets.
no man .. this will not work !!!
Completely useless.You start by 1 unit and win,then double it 2 and win and the double it 4 and win and then double it 8 and loose.So finally 1+2+4=7 win and 8 lost,you can make the next maths.!!!!!!!
plz make video on grid trading
forwarding suggestion to Mark for future material.
@@ukspreadbetting thanks!
Thanks
Silly system. Win 1, win 2, win 4, win 8. Next bet 16. It loses 16 and wipes out your 15 profits. At this point, you're -1. So, having had a winning streak of 4 and not making any profits, you embark up betting 1/2. then 1/4 then 1/8 then 1/16! Stupid staking plan!
Put your money on a table and show us.
Why do Brits always say "ideaR" instead of "idea"?
It's called the English language we can speak it as we like
If the Brits don't speak proper English then who the fuck does? They invented it.
Johnny itâs called a hanging ârâ. Certain areas of the northeast United States use it as well when a word ends in a vowel and the next words begins in a vowel
We don't
Yeahhhh that only works in an actual bull market
Compounding innit
Ä°t's very hard
1 chance / 37 .
The strategy is too dangerous
That strategy cannot secure a good deal in FOREX.
This sounds like a horrible idea.
400 MA still the best
How can you explain?
Gamblers fallacy