At 36:20, the scenario is explained. Beyond that, you're dreaming. From other testimony, all the time from 1978 onward, he was contract to contract. You might think you are gelling (or some "inner sanctum" BS), but it doesn't change the business arrangement.
The judge Paul Boland was very unfair to Patrick Moraz and limited him from getting his share. For 13 years, Patrick was with the moody blues this idiot judge, threw out his right to claim membership of the band because of a document that he signed in 1981 the judge showed that he was prejudice towards Patrick and made unnecessary threats and accusations towards him the judge became I'll and passed...both he and the defendant's attorney , don Engel, displayed dispicable behavior towards Patrick....and were responsible for him to receive very little compensation. Karma caught up to the judge and defendant's attorney and both became I'll and passed. If only both Patrick and the moody blues could have avoided this evil court. An artist's personal has to be kept from the public. These are people who are perceived to be larger than life....and it should have bern kept that way.
Moraz was the one who took it to "evil court". He was offered an out of court settlement of $400,000 ($893,935.85 in 2024). He was awarded significantly less by taking this to "evil court". From testimony, it sounds like he never could manage his money over the extensive time he was with acts such as Yes and the Moody Blues, plus all of the side projects he was involved with during that time, and was grasping at straws to find a source of ample funds. "because of a document that he signed in 1981" - that says it all. He signed contracts. From testimony, there was a different contract from album to album, tour to tour, none of which stipulated he was a full member of the band. It's the same with many a supporting player with many of the largest Rock acts. Is Chuck Leavell to be considered a member of the Rolling Stones because he has supported them on albums and on stage since 1982? No. What's in his contract? (rhetorical question). That states his role within the band.
I'm glad I found more of this.
At 36:20, the scenario is explained. Beyond that, you're dreaming. From other testimony, all the time from 1978 onward, he was contract to contract. You might think you are gelling (or some "inner sanctum" BS), but it doesn't change the business arrangement.
37:40 Start of May 1980. They could have gone and seen Genesis at the Royal Theatre Drury Lane and the Lyceum Theatre in London.😂👍
Oh yeah,He got a heavy duty dye job on that head of hair.
Moraz was a weird looking dude!
The judge Paul Boland was very unfair to Patrick Moraz and limited him from getting his share.
For 13 years, Patrick was with the moody blues this idiot judge, threw out his right to claim membership of the band because of a document that he signed in 1981
the judge showed that he was prejudice towards Patrick and made unnecessary threats and accusations towards him the judge became I'll and passed...both he and the defendant's attorney , don Engel, displayed dispicable behavior towards Patrick....and were responsible for him to receive very little compensation. Karma caught up to the judge and defendant's attorney and both became I'll and passed.
If only both Patrick and the moody blues could have avoided this evil court. An artist's personal has to be kept from the public. These are people who are perceived to be larger than life....and it should have bern kept that way.
Moraz was the one who took it to "evil court". He was offered an out of court settlement of $400,000 ($893,935.85 in 2024). He was awarded significantly less by taking this to "evil court". From testimony, it sounds like he never could manage his money over the extensive time he was with acts such as Yes and the Moody Blues, plus all of the side projects he was involved with during that time, and was grasping at straws to find a source of ample funds.
"because of a document that he signed in 1981" - that says it all. He signed contracts. From testimony, there was a different contract from album to album, tour to tour, none of which stipulated he was a full member of the band. It's the same with many a supporting player with many of the largest Rock acts. Is Chuck Leavell to be considered a member of the Rolling Stones because he has supported them on albums and on stage since 1982? No. What's in his contract? (rhetorical question). That states his role within the band.
Its discuting how they treated a real artist