Congress: A Parliament of TV Pundits | Sarah Isgur, Jonah Goldberg, Steve Hayes
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 06. 2024
- Sarah is joined by Jonah and Steve to discuss the Hunter Biden conviction and debate how much Biden’s age matters.
The Agenda:
-“This is what Joe Biden wanted.”
-Hunter’s tax charges
-Rep. Nancy Mace’s political evolution
-Have Republicans set expectations too low for Biden?
-IVF and political malpractice
-The secret recording of Justices Samuel Alito and John Roberts
To get show notes:
thedispatch.com/podcast/dispa...
#Congress #2024 #politics #conservative
No congress person or senator should be allowed on TV.
Problem solved.
Having Jeffries and Greene on “both sides” of the front image is sort of… inaccurate
Did Alabama make IVF illegal or problematic?
I think that the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that they violate either the law or the state constitution.
Two changes would be helpful in reducing the incentive to be a conspiracy monger instead of a legislator. The supreme court could rule against partisan gerrymanders, more competitive districts produce better candidates.
Another possibility is jungle primaries such as California has. Very partisan districts might have two candidates from the same party. In that case, even a small number of voters from the excluded party could decide who wins. The incentive to promote your policy would remain. The incentive to insult the other party would go away.
The legislative proposal (floor votes for bills with one minority vote from the committee) was interesting.
Jungle primaries seem to have some benefits in theory, but have they really helped Cali? Doesn’t seem so. I’m now skeptical of them.
@@nunyabidness3075 The jungle primaries only have a marginal impact on the partisan makeup of the representatives. However, it does deter some of the more extreme partisanship.
@@jem7636 Theoretically. Cali hasn’t seemed to be more moderately run from the outside.
The Alito tapes (Maybe edited) are available. Your defense is kind of smelly.