I was torn between Sigma 30 1.4 and the Sony 35 1.8. I have the A6300 so I went with the Sony 35 and got it for the price of 300$ on ebay. It's a win win for me because I do video most of the time.
Just bought my a6000 and i really have no idea how to use it. But then i found your videos and that really help me. Thank you so much. I hope you will do video how to use external flash on a6000 soon 😀
Man, that video was extremely helpful! Idk why I didn't find it before. You answered the question "Do I need the OSS or do I need f1.4?" The answer for the a6400 or non stabilized sony's in general, is get the Sony 35mm f1.8 for the OSS. Thanks dude!
Thanks, this video helped me a lot. Been deciding for quite a while now if I should give up my Sony 35f18 for the Sigma 30f14 only because of the updated firmware of the Sigma, but now I'll be keeping the Sony for sure.
Great review and explanation. As a beginner this was a lot more useful than some of the other reviews and videos I've see on the Sigma 30mm vs Sony 35mm. Thank you!
I have both the Sony and sigma 2.8. Have been thinking of getting the sigma 1.4. Thank you for this video! I also love the screen capture view! All around great information and awesome video to help me make a decision! Thanks!
Wow I have the sigma 2.8 and recently found a good deal for sony 35mm f1.4 OSS. But I'm not sure if I need two of them, do u feel that it's redundant to have both?
I bought the 30mm f1.4, it's such a great lens! The only drawback is the noise during video recording without the external mic. If somebody need a good lowlight lens for family videos I recommend the 35mm from sony
that was a great video on real world shooting and low light performance which is always a talking point on crop-sensor cameras. I have the sony 50mm cuz it's cheap and has stabilization. One thing you didn't touch on is how amazingly small the Sony 35 is compared to the sigma. It doesn't dwarf the camera. It's super important considering people buy crop sensor cameras for their portability and their looks.
Do you find the Sony 35mm 1.8 is sharp enough at 1.8 for travel photos, and has a fast auto focus? I'm mainly concerned with the auto focus speed paired with the a6500
@@Gabriel-mb8ks A native lens tends to be fastest for auto focus and Sony has the fastest auto focus around. The Sony is also ultra small and that should be considered if using for travel. That's why I got that lens.
Great video. But I was waiting for a comparison of these 3 in terms of sharpness, autofocus, backround blurr, contrast etc. I hope you do it in the future! nice explanation of how oss affects the results you're able to get in low light though
do you have a video explaining the exposure triangle? or know of a good video that gives a good explanation on how to understand it the best? I like how you broke it down in the video, I just need more detail about.
I have both the sigma 30 1.4 and the sony 35 1.8. For me the sigma is the winner but I also use the a6500 so OSS isn't as important for me. Both are great lenses and both have their advantages. All comes down to what you need it for. Great video and explanation though! I definitely learned something new!
nice video . i was watching a video about the voigtlander 17mm 0.95 . pretty cool but pricy. could i put that the voigtlander on my a 6000 ? thank you .
Thank you very much for the great overview. I have decided for myself that I will go with the Sony 35 mm 1.8 since it is way smaller than the Sigma which makes it better for travel for me :-)
great vid,info overload at first but thats due to me being old n thick haha,everything i wanted to know is in there ,as said very good informative vid and I like how Danny doesnt push one or the other but tells us ..."get this if ......" etc. Well done young man and thank you.
I use the Sony Zeiss 35mm F2.8 for that focal length. It is just as sharp as the 35 F1.8, but I feel has better colours. You do lose a little Bokeh and low light (if thats what you specifically need), but I switch between full frame and an a6500; if I need low light or shallow DOF I use FF. It's a really good (but expensive) alternative. Happy to answer any questions if anyone has them.
I’ve been debating with myself on which lens to get my Sony a6300. I shoot mainly close intimate open mics so wider apertures is what I need (dimly light venues).I want to be able to take both photos and videos. So would you strongly recommend the Sony 35mm F/1.8 OSS then? Because thats what I’m leaning towards. Thank you for your videos and hope to hear back!
Does the sharpness of the Sony 35mm f1.8 come close to the Sigma 16mm f1.4 when both are wide open? Also, does the Sony 35mm have a fast auto focus for video?
Another outstanding video. That prime focal range is the one area that is missing from my camera bag. I'll need to save up for one of the above. I recently picked up a nice used Sony SEL-20F28 20mm F2.8 that I have really been enjoying. I would love to see you do a review of that little pancake.
As another budget option I can also recommend the Samyang 35mm 2.8. It's first and foremost just really light and compact and is my favorite walk around lens for street photography. On my a6500 it is literally pocketable which I love.
I use an A6500 but, I don't own a kit lens. I use virtually all primes with my camera including the 30mm f/1.4. Since the A6500 has built-in IBIS the 30mm f/1.4 is a great combination with tis camera.
I mostly take photos and for that purpose, the Sigma 30 f2.8 is a great day time and semi low light lens. It is light and I got it in near mint condition for 80 GBP. (100$). At that price it's a cracking deal. I am gonna buy the Sony 35 for low light as i need the OSS, minimum focusing distance and the AF accuracy once the light levels drop. I am still going to keep the Sigma 30 f2.8 as my daily beater lens.
Great review , thanks ! I need a 30/35 mm for shooting surfing with a water housing on A6000 , which would you go for between sigma and sony ? Im not too concerned about lower apertures , fast accurate focus and focus tracking are my priority , cheers
In here, in my hometown Sony 35mm is more cheaper than sigma 30mm. So i buy the sony 35mm, and love this lens. The different of 1.8 and 1.4 is not huge too.
The Sigma 30mm f/2.8 hunts like crazy for video, it does find focus easily, but you can tell it constantly tries to keep focus and it is very noticeable compared to the Sony and Sigma 1.4. the 30mm f/2.8 Sigma is pretty much good for photos only, and manual focus video. It IS sharp, but struggles to "lock" on a subject in video. You can buy the f/2.8 for dirt cheap, might be a good B camera lens to have in a pinch
Before I saw this video I wanted to choose the sony 35 1.8 lens because I have an a5100 without ibis, even if it's more expensive but after seeing the video I will stick with the kit lens until next year, if I get a6500 i'll buy sigma 16 and 30mm 1.4
Great video! I have a 6500. Does that mean that the OSS in the Sony lens will not matter? I kinda want to go with the Sigma but favor the Sony due to OSS.
I decided on the Sony 35mm over the Sigma 30mm for two reasons. I have not verified these problems myself, only from online reviews, so YMMV. First, the Sigma autofocus reputedly had problems early on and was improved, but not entirely fixed, with a firmware update. Second, the autofocus motor noise was reported to be too loud and would show up in video, even when using a camera-mounted shotgun mic. Do you have an opinion on these issues, Danny? BTW, I have the Sigma 16mm and love it!
I get your point for the difference between 1.4 and 1.8 and OSS providing you lower shutter speeds but, if your using a tripod there’s no point anymore. With a tripod you can slow down you shutter as much as you want. But I get it, sometimes you don’t have the opportunity to setup a tripod.
Correct! But, if you are travelling and just wanna shoot stuff, at night, while walking with your girl... I would go with the Sony. Hate SONY for selling stuff so expensive and SIGMA for not putting OSS on their lenses.
So basically what you mean is that if you are an owner of a6500 IBIS then the better choice would be the sigma 30mm 1.4 instead of sony 35mm 1.8. As you can go even lower iso than 250 and 1/13 of second than sony 35mm?? One more question which is really important. A6500 has IBIS will i get the same stabilization with sigma 30mm 1.4 that i would get with a sony 35mm 1.8?
you all probably dont care but does anybody know a method to log back into an Instagram account? I was stupid lost my account password. I love any tips you can give me!
@Albert Rodney I really appreciate your reply. I found the site through google and im in the hacking process now. Looks like it's gonna take a while so I will reply here later with my results.
is it worth double the money (here in croatia at least) 30mm 1.4 over 30mm 2.8. the price difference at this moment is not that small? i wanna do some night photos?
Perhaps a little late, but IBIS is not the same with OSS - the latter one does not offer fwd and bwd movement stabilisation (so, 5 axis), whereas the OSS has only 3 axis stabilisation, as far as I know...
Shut up, not ALL videos have to be the same. The guy pointed other things, that all the mass reviewers did not. People like you don't really get CZcams...
I loved the Sigma 30mm F1.4 it was so sharp. I honestly miss it for portraits. I sold it for the Sony 35mm 1.8 because I shoot a lot of video & own the a6300. & I really needed the lens stabilization
@@cj64films HEY!!!! Exactly my setup (6300) and was thinking to buy the Sony, too, just for the OSS. ARE YOU HAPPY with it? Happier then with the Sigma? Please answer. IT WOULD HELP ME A LOT!
I’m very happy with it! It’s still a pretty sharp lens. Not as sharp as the sigma but for video it’s a life saver. Below is a short film I shot myself & primary used the 35mm F1.8 m.czcams.com/video/g2Ly66Jh_9o/video.html
mavfan1 Ive been using the kit lens for the past 2 years, super happy with it. Now i think its time for an upgrade. My main focus is shooting vlogs, with little cinematic sequences. Also taking some nice pics.
This video is pointless. Whoever wants to buy this lenses already knows this kind of stuffs. How about sharpness comparison? What about show us which is better to shot fast moving subjects like dogs? OSS + native lens af vs sigma 30 f1.4 af? What about bokeh quality? Or contrast? No one use this lenses to shot some pointless things in a dark room. Be real and be informative. This video just a clickbait.
There is someone who missed the points. NOT EVERY video has to be about contrast, sharpness and shit. The guy made some good points about OSS vs NO OSS, if you shoot at night - what use is 1.4 if you get shaky videos or blurred photos and have to go some stops higher or use different shutter, to compensate the lack of OSS and get, more or less, the same results, IF YOU ARE not using a tripod all the time (and, btw, WHO does that, while walking with your girl through a city, at night?)?
Two years old - and still the best videos to find about this subject matter. Helped a lot - thanks man!
I was torn between Sigma 30 1.4 and the Sony 35 1.8. I have the A6300 so I went with the Sony 35 and got it for the price of 300$ on ebay. It's a win win for me because I do video most of the time.
Was thinking about those lenses ! Danny is reading our minds 😂😂
Great Video as usual , Man !
What a great video! No-one else had done this. Exceptional! Very useful..
Just bought my a6000 and i really have no idea how to use it. But then i found your videos and that really help me. Thank you so much. I hope you will do video how to use external flash on a6000 soon 😀
Love your channel. My favorite & the reason why I have the a6500.
Man, that video was extremely helpful! Idk why I didn't find it before. You answered the question "Do I need the OSS or do I need f1.4?" The answer for the a6400 or non stabilized sony's in general, is get the Sony 35mm f1.8 for the OSS. Thanks dude!
Thanks, this video helped me a lot. Been deciding for quite a while now if I should give up my Sony 35f18 for the Sigma 30f14 only because of the updated firmware of the Sigma, but now I'll be keeping the Sony for sure.
So helpful! Really detail and love the conclusion. ♥️ from Vietnam
Thank you very much for the Details Information!
Great review and explanation. As a beginner this was a lot more useful than some of the other reviews and videos I've see on the Sigma 30mm vs Sony 35mm. Thank you!
Полностью согласен, теперь до конца понятно связь стабилизации и ИСО.
Great video, great examples. I have a6300 and Sony 35 1.8, I want to buy this kit Sigma 16mm
I have both the Sony and sigma 2.8. Have been thinking of getting the sigma 1.4. Thank you for this video! I also love the screen capture view! All around great information and awesome video to help me make a decision! Thanks!
Wow I have the sigma 2.8 and recently found a good deal for sony 35mm f1.4 OSS. But I'm not sure if I need two of them, do u feel that it's redundant to have both?
I bought the 30mm f1.4, it's such a great lens! The only drawback is the noise during video recording without the external mic. If somebody need a good lowlight lens for family videos I recommend the 35mm from sony
Just bought the sigma from eBay. No turning back for me now hahaha.
Love your works, man!!
Great comparison!! 👏🏻👏🏻
that was a great video on real world shooting and low light performance which is always a talking point on crop-sensor cameras. I have the sony 50mm cuz it's cheap and has stabilization.
One thing you didn't touch on is how amazingly small the Sony 35 is compared to the sigma. It doesn't dwarf the camera. It's super important considering people buy crop sensor cameras for their portability and their looks.
Thank you so much for this video thank you
It's too much informative.. Great one...
One of the best youtubers!!
Nicely done! Everyone loves the sigma 30 f1.4. I have the Sony and love it, but it’s quite pricy. You listed some great points!
Do you find the Sony 35mm 1.8 is sharp enough at 1.8 for travel photos, and has a fast auto focus? I'm mainly concerned with the auto focus speed paired with the a6500
Yeah definitely i love sigma30 f1.4.not only it's faster aperture and also it's slightly sharper than sony 50 and 35 sel, i assume...
Here the Sony is only 25€ more expensive than the Sigma 1.4. What would be your choice if that was the case where you live?
@@thierrylerinckx1340 sigma easily. Sony lens sharpness is poopoo. You just have advantage of oss
@@Gabriel-mb8ks A native lens tends to be fastest for auto focus and Sony has the fastest auto focus around. The Sony is also ultra small and that should be considered if using for travel. That's why I got that lens.
Been waiting for this! 😊 I own Sony E 35mm f1.8 OSS, so... 😁
Great video. But I was waiting for a comparison of these 3 in terms of sharpness, autofocus, backround blurr, contrast etc. I hope you do it in the future! nice explanation of how oss affects the results you're able to get in low light though
Great video danny
do you have a video explaining the exposure triangle? or know of a good video that gives a good explanation on how to understand it the best? I like how you broke it down in the video, I just need more detail about.
Amazing video thanks
Where’d you get the adapter connecting your Ninja V to your camera
Great comparison. Simple, to the point with examples. Also, too many CZcams channels focus on Vlogging and videos. I just want to shoot stills. Thanks
What would you recommend lens for beginner and use for landscapes and open air photography :)
I have the Sony 35mm f1.8 and it's a game changer
Wow, it wasn’t a dream....this channel does exist.
What you rig? How do you use an external monitor?
I have both the sigma 30 1.4 and the sony 35 1.8. For me the sigma is the winner but I also use the a6500 so OSS isn't as important for me. Both are great lenses and both have their advantages. All comes down to what you need it for. Great video and explanation though! I definitely learned something new!
Love it thx
nice video .
i was watching a video about the voigtlander 17mm 0.95 . pretty cool but pricy.
could i put that the voigtlander on my a 6000 ?
thank you .
Thank you very much for the great overview. I have decided for myself that I will go with the Sony 35 mm 1.8 since it is way smaller than the Sigma which makes it better for travel for me :-)
Thank for your sharing!! Should I get Ninja V for A6500/6300? How you feel when you used Ninja V for a time? Plz give me your comment. Thank so much
I have sony a33 mirrorless camera that has benn working great but thinking of upgrading to the sony a6000 or the nikon d5600.
What are your thoughts
great vid,info overload at first but thats due to me being old n thick haha,everything i wanted to know is in there ,as said very good informative vid and I like how Danny doesnt push one or the other but tells us ..."get this if ......" etc.
Well done young man and thank you.
How much Af noise is there in the sigma 1.4 compared to the Sony 1.8?
Thankss man.
The Canon FD 35mm f2 concave Thorium is extremely sharp and I use it all the time.
I use the Sony Zeiss 35mm F2.8 for that focal length. It is just as sharp as the 35 F1.8, but I feel has better colours. You do lose a little Bokeh and low light (if thats what you specifically need), but I switch between full frame and an a6500; if I need low light or shallow DOF I use FF. It's a really good (but expensive) alternative. Happy to answer any questions if anyone has them.
I heard Sigma lenses have loud autofocus, so if you record video with internal audio you will hear that. Also OSS is for video a great help.
I’ve been debating with myself on which lens to get my Sony a6300. I shoot mainly close intimate open mics so wider apertures is what I need (dimly light venues).I want to be able to take both photos and videos. So would you strongly recommend the Sony 35mm F/1.8 OSS then? Because thats what I’m leaning towards. Thank you for your videos and hope to hear back!
Does the sharpness of the Sony 35mm f1.8 come close to the Sigma 16mm f1.4 when both are wide open? Also, does the Sony 35mm have a fast auto focus for video?
i'd go with sony 35mm 1.8 OSS, considering the size. great for street, travel and general use
Also, for hand held video it would be great than sigma 30mm.
Another outstanding video. That prime focal range is the one area that is missing from my camera bag. I'll need to save up for one of the above. I recently picked up a nice used Sony SEL-20F28 20mm F2.8 that I have really been enjoying. I would love to see you do a review of that little pancake.
As another budget option I can also recommend the Samyang 35mm 2.8. It's first and foremost just really light and compact and is my favorite walk around lens for street photography. On my a6500 it is literally pocketable which I love.
It was one I considered adding to the mix, just didn’t have it on me that day, but a good option especially if you shoot full-frame too.
@@that1cameraguy maybe something for a future comparison video ;)
Keep up the great content!
What about video quality of sony 35mm f1.8oss?
I use an A6500 but, I don't own a kit lens. I use virtually all primes with my camera including the 30mm f/1.4. Since the A6500 has built-in IBIS the 30mm f/1.4 is a great combination with tis camera.
I mostly take photos and for that purpose, the Sigma 30 f2.8 is a great day time and semi low light lens.
It is light and I got it in near mint condition for 80 GBP. (100$).
At that price it's a cracking deal.
I am gonna buy the Sony 35 for low light as i need the OSS, minimum focusing distance and the AF accuracy once the light levels drop.
I am still going to keep the Sigma 30 f2.8 as my daily beater lens.
Great review , thanks ! I need a 30/35 mm for shooting surfing with a water housing on A6000 , which would you go for between sigma and sony ? Im not too concerned about lower apertures , fast accurate focus and focus tracking are my priority , cheers
(stills not video )
Sony, due to stability. You'll be moving a lot in the water.
In here, in my hometown Sony 35mm is more cheaper than sigma 30mm.
So i buy the sony 35mm, and love this lens.
The different of 1.8 and 1.4 is not huge too.
I wanna know your thoughts on that ninja v on that camera.
I Am Aaron Edwards using it for tutorials it’s good so far. I much prefer it over the atomic ninja 2 I’ve used.
The Sigma 30mm f/2.8 hunts like crazy for video, it does find focus easily, but you can tell it constantly tries to keep focus and it is very noticeable compared to the Sony and Sigma 1.4. the 30mm f/2.8 Sigma is pretty much good for photos only, and manual focus video. It IS sharp, but struggles to "lock" on a subject in video. You can buy the f/2.8 for dirt cheap, might be a good B camera lens to have in a pinch
I got my Sony 35 f1.8.
Before I saw this video I wanted to choose the sony 35 1.8 lens because I have an a5100 without ibis, even if it's more expensive but after seeing the video I will stick with the kit lens until next year, if I get a6500 i'll buy sigma 16 and 30mm 1.4
BEST CHOICE, if you can afford it and WILLING to spend that ;)
Great video! I have a 6500. Does that mean that the OSS in the Sony lens will not matter? I kinda want to go with the Sigma but favor the Sony due to OSS.
Liz Keyser from what I’ve heard the OSS plus IBIS has additive benefits
@@Reviews4fun1 Indeed. Movement becomes silky smooth
How is the battery life of atomos v? Usually atomos monitor battery life is around 30 minutes for recoding
tAklHa still testing it out, I’ll keep an eye on it. It lasted for about 40min if recording and only half battery ran down while working on this video
I decided on the Sony 35mm over the Sigma 30mm for two reasons. I have not verified these problems myself, only from online reviews, so YMMV. First, the Sigma autofocus reputedly had problems early on and was improved, but not entirely fixed, with a firmware update. Second, the autofocus motor noise was reported to be too loud and would show up in video, even when using a camera-mounted shotgun mic. Do you have an opinion on these issues, Danny? BTW, I have the Sigma 16mm and love it!
Hi, great video. Will the sony 35mm 1.8 work on my a5100?
Yes
What a great video comparing different aperture, not only limited to comparing these lenses. Well done!
I get your point for the difference between 1.4 and 1.8 and OSS providing you lower shutter speeds but, if your using a tripod there’s no point anymore. With a tripod you can slow down you shutter as much as you want. But I get it, sometimes you don’t have the opportunity to setup a tripod.
Can I use the sigma 16mm 1.4 and use the zoom on the camera?
You can
Hi, if we use the tripod then stabilization is not a issue right? Then any lense among these is fine right?
Correct! But, if you are travelling and just wanna shoot stuff, at night, while walking with your girl...
I would go with the Sony.
Hate SONY for selling stuff so expensive and SIGMA for not putting OSS on their lenses.
I use a 35mm f1.7 manual for my a6300
OEM ftw
There are quite a few more options available including the Zeiss 32 F1.8 Touit and the tiny Samyang FE AF 35 F2.8.
I keep telling him he needs do do a Touit comparison.
Does it have autofocus?
Sigma 30mm f2.8 is amazing! My favorite for stills. I wish there was a 23mm af lens also.
I've been considering the Samyang AF 24 F2.8. Though everyone seems to like the Sonnar 24 F1.8 ZA.
I just got one. Would it be ideal for street photography?
Also the Sony 24mm f2 is a good choice
So basically what you mean is that if you are an owner of a6500 IBIS then the better choice would be the sigma 30mm 1.4 instead of sony 35mm 1.8. As you can go even lower iso than 250 and 1/13 of second than sony 35mm??
One more question which is really important. A6500 has IBIS will i get the same stabilization with sigma 30mm 1.4 that i would get with a sony 35mm 1.8?
Perhaps, bit late, but: NO.
3 axis vs. 5 axis.
Sigma 30mm f1.4 all the way. The sharpness of the Sigma destroys the Sony.
wow a new video?!
I laughed when I saw you guys both drop them at the same time haha.
Johnson City Aerial Photography LLC I miss the 3am drops from Danny hahaha it motivates me to push out more content
you all probably dont care but does anybody know a method to log back into an Instagram account?
I was stupid lost my account password. I love any tips you can give me!
@Giovanni Paul instablaster ;)
@Albert Rodney I really appreciate your reply. I found the site through google and im in the hacking process now.
Looks like it's gonna take a while so I will reply here later with my results.
is it worth double the money (here in croatia at least) 30mm 1.4 over 30mm 2.8. the price difference at this moment is not that small? i wanna do some night photos?
Use tripod and slow shutter speed. If you can't then 1.4 might help you a bit, still won't be a problem-free solution for night photo.
Do you think the A6500 IBIS is good enough to mitigate the lack of OSS on 30mm 1.4 ? Making it the ideal choice among the three. Thanks
Yes, that what i would like to know if the A6500's IBIS with sigma 30mm is equivelant to Sony's 35mm OSS
Perhaps a little late, but IBIS is not the same with OSS - the latter one does not offer fwd and bwd movement stabilisation (so, 5 axis),
whereas the OSS has only 3 axis stabilisation, as far as I know...
Are you tracking any good a6000 lenses for black Friday? Also if you had 1 zoom lens in your kit what would it be.
Dylan Drenner the one I’ve tried out and don’t own is the sony 18-135. If I needed to have one zoom lens it’d be the 10-18.
Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 is the best 35mm you can get for the money. :)
I bought SEL 35/1.8 used for about 178$, native lens is the best 👍
Sigma 30 1.4 on a a6500 is astonishing.
No factoring of colour fringing or chromatic aberration or vignetting on the largest apertures of each lens? Interesting
Shut up, not ALL videos have to be the same. The guy pointed other things, that all the mass reviewers did not.
People like you don't really get CZcams...
Please can you explain the rule of "1,2,3" ?! :D
Every 3 movements on Speed, Iso or aperture it is a step
@@poseidon4994 thanks Poseidon for the explaination :)
I think the 28mm f/2 should be included in this conversation
Better option with a6000
My opinion, sigma is better for photo quality and sony for video
I have the sigma 30mm and Sony 35. Went crazy buying lenses. I prefer the 30mm sigma and want to sell the Sony 35mm.
Your using it on A6500. More videos or photos?
I loved the Sigma 30mm F1.4 it was so sharp. I honestly miss it for portraits. I sold it for the Sony 35mm 1.8 because I shoot a lot of video & own the a6300. & I really needed the lens stabilization
ryszard zolkowski a6500 photos and videos.
@@cj64films HEY!!!! Exactly my setup (6300) and was thinking to buy the Sony, too, just for the OSS.
ARE YOU HAPPY with it? Happier then with the Sigma?
Please answer. IT WOULD HELP ME A LOT!
I’m very happy with it! It’s still a pretty sharp lens. Not as sharp as the sigma but for video it’s a life saver. Below is a short film I shot myself & primary used the 35mm F1.8 m.czcams.com/video/g2Ly66Jh_9o/video.html
30mm 1.4 or 16mm 1.4??
RechieFilms depends on what you shoot.
RechieFilms 16mm
mavfan1 Ive been using the kit lens for the past 2 years, super happy with it. Now i think its time for an upgrade. My main focus is shooting vlogs, with little cinematic sequences. Also taking some nice pics.
that1cameraguy Ive been thinking of that, also does it shoot good portrait? nothing serius, some pics for ig only ;)
Go for 16mm if you want to vlogging
What is with humans in dark rooms? Maybe there is the 30mm f1.4 better? ;)
Sigma f1.4 30mm rocks.. I m using it for the past 1.5 years...
is it okay for videos?
I just returned a Sigma 30 F1.4. My little 30 F2.8 Art is much sharper, has a much flatter focus plane, and less distortion and aberrations.
Matthew Huizing i'm an 80% vid, 20% photo person. is sigma 30mm 2.8 good for me?
@@deedee-yk2vi Good for stills but NOT bad for videos.
@@QuietOC I am surprised to hear this.. but anyhow cheers!
Sony 35mm is cheaper than sigma 30mm here in Indonesia
Please ignore the tub most ninja 5 3:07 cc
With the Sony 35mm f1.8 you can upgrade in the future to a full frame Sony with no problem because it is a full frame lens
lol dude. Sony 35mm f1.8 it is APSC lens. not full frame lens
:)
This video is pointless. Whoever wants to buy this lenses already knows this kind of stuffs. How about sharpness comparison? What about show us which is better to shot fast moving subjects like dogs? OSS + native lens af vs sigma 30 f1.4 af? What about bokeh quality? Or contrast? No one use this lenses to shot some pointless things in a dark room. Be real and be informative. This video just a clickbait.
There is someone who missed the points.
NOT EVERY video has to be about contrast, sharpness and shit.
The guy made some good points about OSS vs NO OSS, if you shoot at night - what use is 1.4 if you get shaky videos or blurred photos and have to go some stops higher or use different shutter, to compensate the lack of OSS and get, more or less, the same results,
IF YOU ARE not using a tripod all the time (and, btw, WHO does that, while walking with your girl through a city, at night?)?
@@techguyml Stfu. You did not understand shit