The Citizen Amendment Act: Explained | Faye D'Souza
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 05. 2024
- On Monday, March 12, the Central government notified the rules for the Citizenship (Amendment) Act,, more than four years after it was passed in the Parliament in December 2019. It has sparked a wide range of reactions across the political spectrum not just in the country but across the World. Faye D’souza breaks down what the new rules imply.
Producer: Ira Jha
Researcher: Sara Varghese
Video Editor: Subhankar Singh Samanta
For more news and updates, download the Beatroot News App:
www.beatrootnews.com/download
Follow Faye D’Souza on Social Media
Instagram: / fayedsouza
Twitter: / fayedsouza
Facebook: / fayedsouzaofficial
#caa #bjp #assam #religion #constition #equality
Bangladesh has Islam as its state religion . Bangladeshi muslims migrate due to economic reasons, hindus migrate due to religious persecution.
Bangladeshi hindu refugees also come for economic purpose else alas you can see that government of India have no rights to invite unwanted guests in our home when whole country is suffering from overpopulation 😭😒😒when these refugees have everything in future and we local suffer then only you guys realise how bad Is to invite unwanted refugees 😢😭
Hindus migrate to Canada, uk ,heck saudi uae etc. What if they block hindus. Idiotic at best and hypocritical at best
@@shamiliq If you mean Rohingya Muslims, ask them not to kill their fellow rohingya Hindus first.
Rohingya is not our responsibility we bcz myanmar was not portioned from India.@@shamiliq
@@HarshRaj-ec1dz Ok, i told them, waiting for a response, will report here when they respond, since you are all about giving orders.
Wasn't India divided on the basis of religion?
Respect does not equate free citizenship. It's not that the persecuted Hindus are fast tracked because they're respected more. They are mostly those who couldn't leave when the pie was being divided based on who you worshipped.
@@HorceJatt, you hand is cut, because you had tilak on your forehead.
But after cutting hand, you avoid putting tilak on forehead !
This is the level of your intelligence.
@@HorceJatt Soon It will, because it's right of Indic culture. Whatever happened during independence by our bhuna babus it feels Hindus just lost everything. Muslim took land which was Indic and India also became secular, What a joke.
@@user-rq6ef9ek6n watching idiots like you talk about intelligence is hilarious.
@@HorceJatt
If India is a secular country , it doesn’t mean we should give citizenship to everybody . India is giving citizenship to those towards whom India has moral obligation . Sikhs are also included in this law because they deserve . However , asking a seperate country for Sikhs is a crime .
It's not anti Muslim as Muslims got their own country at the time of partition, period.
India is secular,not just for Hindus. It's access to citizenship shouldn't be on the basis of religion
This doesn't apply to Indians regardless of whatever. This applies to only majority community who got their wish of separate country on the basis of religion at the time of partition. Of course within India everyone enjoys equal rights.@@greenrico10
@@greenrico10, if it secular, will you learn to ask why there is personal law ??
Why Waqf board ?
Why temples are treated differently then Masjit and Charches ?
Will you open mouth secularly ??
if that is your logic ,then all muslim majority countrys should not allow citizenship to hindus
@@greenrico10 But the country still was partitioned on religious lines. And Hindus are minorities in the mentioned countries.
Our country was partitioned n formed based on religion and we were not formed as a secular country!! The word secular was added to the constitution unilaterally in an undemocratic way during Emergency!
We were formed as a country which respected all religions and equal rights were given to Indian citizens practicing any religion and people were free to practice any religion! This law is not for Indian citizens. CAA is for Pakistani, Afghani n Bangladeshi citizens who were persecuted in the Islamic countries which failed to protect the minorities as promised during partition.
Why do refugees in EU, UK and America convert to Christianity to fast track their citizenship process?? It is because these countries have easier n quicker citizenship process for Christian’s refugees!! Are they discriminating against other religions?? Are that not ‘secular’ countries??
UK n many EU countries have Anglo Christianity or Christianity as their official religion. So calling them ‘ secular’ itself is a Joke! But that’s a whole different argument😅
The fundamental right to equality is within the territory of India. It does not apply to territories outside India. India can pass a law which discriminates people on any ground it deems fit when it comes to giving citizenship. You cannot say because India is giving citizenship to persecuted people from Pakistan it should also give citizenship to people persecuted in Argentina. An illegal migrant (a refugee) from Pakistan, Afghanistan or Bangladesh who is a muslim will not get the benefit of CAA because he is a muslim BECAUSE it cannot be said that he migrated to India because he is a muslim from these countries. He could have, and most likely would have, migrated because of economic reasons. For that he has to apply for citizenship as a refugee and his case will be considered on merit.
accurate
Let pakistan have its own CAA so that muslims who feel unsafe in BHARAT can go there.
❤❤❤Agree
Why do refugees in EU, UK and America convert to Christianity to fast track their citizenship process?? It is because these countries have easier n quicker citizenship process for Christian’s refugees!! Are they discriminating against other religions?? Are that not ‘secular’ countries??
UK n many EU countries have Anglo Christianity or Christianity as their official religion. So calling them ‘ secular’ itself is a Joke! But that’s a whole different argument😅
The right to religion and not being discriminated on the basis of religion is fundamental and anyone within the borders of India, not just Indians. Also the process to apply for indian citizenship must be secular under all circumstances
Yes, we remember Shaheen Bagh.
NIA said 20 Crores of Funding for it came from Qatar, Saudi and Iraq (ISIS)
Fake news
@@User39814how do you know? What are you? A RAW agent?
Why do refugees in EU, UK and America convert to Christianity to fast track their citizenship process?? It is because these countries have easier n quicker citizenship process for Christian’s refugees!! Are they discriminating against other religions?? Are that not ‘secular’ countries??
UK n many EU countries have Anglo Christianity or Christianity as their official religion. So calling them ‘ secular’ itself is a Joke! But that’s a whole different argument😅
@@ragsyboy1463 op India ka news accept nahi karta mein🤣. Burden of proof remains with the one making the claim
Show me one credible source.
How many citizenships given by alzajeer Qatar, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Myanmar to Indian Muslims and other religious people to question India or talk on Indian muslims but it doesn't mean innocent true Indian muslims to suffer in India. Ultimately division of country did based on religion, India lost major junk of land to accommodate and provide livelihood to people migrated. States have to accommodate and provide livelihood then how Union alone can decide without consulting states.
no indian muslim will suffer bu this law
She is asking to provide proof of Minorites being persecuted in Pakistan and Bangladesh 😂😂😂😂 Wah Didi wah...
The oral and moral commitments made by India and Pakistan Governments in early years - right after the partition, to take care of minorities in their own countries have been violated by Pakistan and Bangladesh but not India. Pakistan had more than 20 % Hindus in early 1950s but now less than 5 %. Bangladesh had 22% hindus but now just 10% , whereas in India Muslim population has increased from 9% around 14% .
Clearly non Muslims were religiously prosecuted in those countries but who did that? Answer is ALL Muslims - Sunnis, Shias, Ahmedias etc etc. There were united on one thing and that is to religiously prosecute non muslims in those by-lay islamic state.
Mahatma Gandhi promised Hindus and SIkhs of Pakistan and Bangladesh to comeback to India anytime, if they were religiously prosecuted. Manmohan Singh and others have also talked about giving citizenships to such non muslins.
Mistake India made under Nehru was not to amend the law early on, to reflect Mahatma Gandhi's promise. Modi has done it - and not just for Hindus and Sikhs as Mahatma Gandhi said but to also Christians!
All this information was not argued by Faye and that clearly shows her anti Modi bias
Why do refugees in EU, UK and America convert to Christianity to fast track their citizenship process?? It is because these countries have easier n quicker citizenship process for Christian’s refugees!! Are they discriminating against other religions?? Are that not ‘secular’ countries??
UK n many EU countries have Anglo Christianity or Christianity as their official religion. So calling them ‘ secular’ itself is a Joke! But that’s a whole different argument😅
💯
How can shias and ahmadiyas persecute religious minorities when they themselves aren't considered muslims?
Article 14 only applies to citizens. They are migrants from these countries and not citizens yet. So, this argument does not hold any water. The sad part it Christians and Hindus in these neighbouring countries were the lower caste Dalits who have been abandoned and left to die. The rich UC hindus ran away and came to India during partition and now are not bothered about the people who have been sufferring there. I don't buy the argument that muslims are persecuted in islamic countries. If they are, they can fight the legal battle in those countries. The other religious minorities in these countries don't even stand a chance.
Abhinav Chandrachud is a entitle, elite person who is giving some grand standing lectures having lived in India all his life in a Judges quarters and may have had 40 domestic helps in his bunglow all the time. We should avoid paying attention to these elite, entitled people
Please understand issue in Assam is different. We don't want Assam to turned into a state where there are more people of other ethnicity than Assamese.
Doesn’t change anything. If he is elite or not , facts are still facts. Stop spreading your post-truth mentality here.
Problem is with u you think you know everything where are you are In confine of home typing this or trotting throughout the country to understand the real ethnic issues. Your comment are half baked devoid of actual understanding. North east itself is very sensitive difficult issue so far manipur itself not resolved it's ticking time bomb then Assam far complicates
Why do refugees in EU, UK and America convert to Christianity to fast track their citizenship process?? It is because these countries have easier n quicker citizenship process for Christian’s refugees!! Are they discriminating against other religions?? Are that not ‘secular’ countries??
UK n many EU countries have Anglo Christianity or Christianity as their official religion. So calling them ‘ secular’ itself is a Joke! But that’s a whole different argument😅
@@lupabiswal6038 north east states are not included in CAA
We are taking Hindus which are prosecuted in neighbouring countries. This is by Indian law is not discrimination against any Indian citizen.Daily People who pray facing towards Mecca don't wamt people of minority to enter in theiir country. As minority they supposed to welcome another minority. This inability to accept people from India's majority is really concerning.
CAA is exposing left liberal's Hinduphobia .
It's amazing that you didn't even metion why this is needed because of the unique history of our subcontinent. Partition happened on the basis of one religion. How is it problematic to ease the process for the persecuted minorities on the basis of religion ( not economic factors) to get back to the Mother Land. Also Please explain how does muslims get persecuted on declared Islamic States. About the Ahmadiyas, Pakistan doesn't consider them muslim. It's their problem not ours. Ahmadiyas are Muslims in Indian. So taking the Ahmadiyas is accepting the definition of Islam of pakistan??
Cry a River but CAA is here to stay!!!
Thank you for stressing that India is a secular country. A Uniform Civil Code is therefore a must!
First preference to persecuted people ...
Persucated ryongyas should be taken care by Islamic neighbour's....
agree
If we are really Secular, UCC needs to be implemented nationally and Waqf board should be abolished
Goan Christians were able to get Portuguese citizenship merely by virtue of their parents or grandparents being born in Goa, Daman or Diu prior to 20/12/1961. If Portugal can do it why can't India? 🤔
Portugal have less population India have overpopulation 😢
Incorrect.
People born in Goa, Daman and Diu before 1961 can apply. Religion is not a criteria.
@@TheFoxxxxxxxxx Only Christians were allowed by Portuguese under this law. Hindus can apply through the other route that is available for all other nationalities. I know this because I am a Hindu and my wife is Christian of Portuguese descent. 😁
@@Email-mu1mv Sorry you are incorrect, I have meet 1000s of Goan Hindus and Gujrati (From daman and diu) Hindus with Portuguese passport in the UK. We have an association, so I know as a matter of fact.
@@TheFoxxxxxxxxx 1) Portugese citizenship through the normal and 2) Portuguese citizenship by virtue of this pre 1961 rule. , are separate and distinct ways. Hindus can get Portugese citizenship only and only through option1) whereas Portuguese Christians can use both 2) & 1).
My understanding is that the fundamental right to equality in our country applies to a person who is a citizen of the country. What i do not understand is how a person who is not yet a citizen can claim equality. Someone explain please.
Article 14 is applicable to both citizens and non citizens of India, but its application depends on context. When we talk about equality under article 14, we are talking about equality in the eyes of law for people who are equally placed. But clearly, the Hindu, Sikh, buddhist, christian minorities of Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan are not equally placed. If Article 14 was to be applicable in every context, we would not have reservations or Waqf Board. If Article 14 is applied with respect to foreigners coming in India, it takes away the state's sovereign power to take decisions based on security considerations. Hence, CAA does not stand as something unconstitutional when viewed from the lens of equality of law.
Hope this helps understand.
Once M population reaches 51% in India, will the country remain secular?
That's definitely a no Brainer question. The moment they become majority, India is Islamic country.
It won't happen how can people let it happen
If we are secular why are only temples taxed??
fake news, all institutions are taxed equally: pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1494419
so glad you have addressed Assam as a separate issue otherwise it was getting jumbled up with the overall view in the country.
Why do refugees in EU, UK and America convert to Christianity to fast track their citizenship process?? It is because these countries have easier n quicker citizenship process for Christian’s refugees!! Are they discriminating against other religions?? Are that not ‘secular’ countries??
UK n many EU countries have Anglo Christianity or Christianity as their official religion. So calling them ‘ secular’ itself is a Joke! But that’s a whole different argument😅
I do not believe CAA/NRC creates religious divide rather it addresses known issue(s):
(1) It’s a fact that religious minorities in Muslim countries are at risk of being targeted.
(2) I don’t understand why amendment that helps minorities is made to look like anti-Muslim. We created a whole new citizenship with India-Pakistan partition based purely on religion and this divide was led by a Muslim leader and backed by British divide-n-rule policy. Further many of other laws (in India and other countries) exist that are based on religious beliefs and need revision/reforms.
(3) It’s a fact that there are many Muslim majority countries. While I agree that just like India’s caste system segregates within the religion and creates feud similarly Muslims might be facing issues within the religion. However it is something that should take course of asylum laws outside of CAA. Better yet handled domestically or as a global agenda should the countries agree on the fact that human rights should be a global code applicable across all countries/religions/caste..
(4) The state government leaders who oppose the law using arguments of equality should actually see the documentary “Wobblies”. It’s a documentary on Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) that refuse to recognize religion or any other divide but only identify themselves as working class. If they are serious about humanity then that is the course of action to take and not creating a melodrama even when CAA/NRC facts and intent are made clear.
It is good for those who get citizenship via CAA but otherwise could not prove via NRC. What happens to those who cannot prove eligibility via CAA or NRC?
Living aside what CAA is and why is has been brought and it's various aspect, If CAA is unconstitutional because it's based on religious identity (somehow) and hence shouldn't be implemented, then what about:
Basis of Partition
Waqf Act
Minority commission
1991 worship act
Hindu temple under government control
Haj subsidy
And many more ?
You have a point
Whataboutery
@@shiroyasha_007 one's whataboutry is another one's peak hypocrisy.
@@shiroyasha_007 still the point is valid
Those are not inherently discriminative in nature. Giving some right to a particular group is not exactly same as taking away a right only from a particular group. Second one is discrimination by definition.
One thing that I am having a really hard time understanding is that "what if a Muslim or from any religion for that matter, who is illegally migrated from these countries says that he is a Hindu and gets the citizenship" this can also create major national security issues.
Brainwashing that Muslims undergo thanks to their book is too strong for them even to assume or fake identification as non muslim
MUSLIM LOGIC
On CAA : Why isn't everybody equal?
On UCC : How can you treat everyone as equal?
Namaskara Faye 🙏 the word secular not in our constitution originally, it was added later. Already Indian Citizens (of any faith) have nothing to worry about CAA, as this law is only to grant citizenship to minorities from our neighbouring countries. Al-Jazeera is an anti-india media channel, hence India never takes it seriously. Qatar can take all muslim refugees across the world into to show its fake leadership in the divided muslim world. These countries don't have any position to lecture India on democracy and diversity. Many civilizations came and perished, only India has truely stood the test of time. Akanda Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 Jai Hind
Are you saying India is not secular?
@@shiroyasha_007
Secular word was added in constitution during emergency in unconstitutional way .
Hindus hav e always and are Pulralist or secualr 1000 of years@@KumarK-cn1sj
So the torturers too need protection of the CAA! Afterall India that is Bharat was partitioned based on the 'secular' principles !!
Faye, i laughed so hard when you said ' like staying alive'! informative video. thanks
Why do refugees in EU, UK and America convert to Christianity to fast track their citizenship process?? It is because these countries have easier n quicker citizenship process for Christian’s refugees!! Are they discriminating against other religions?? Are that not ‘secular’ countries??
UK n many EU countries have Anglo Christianity or Christianity as their official religion. So calling them ‘ secular’ itself is a Joke! But that’s a whole different argument😅
Finally a video that addresses and explains the issue directly instead going around in circles and not caring to explain the basis of the argument like other news channels
Why do refugees in EU, UK and America convert to Christianity to fast track their citizenship process?? It is because these countries have easier n quicker citizenship process for Christian’s refugees!! Are they discriminating against other religions?? Are that not ‘secular’ countries??
UK n many EU countries have Anglo Christianity or Christianity as their official religion. So calling them ‘ secular’ itself is a Joke! But that’s a whole different argument😅
but she does not disclose the details that Mr Nehru agreed to take "MIN ORITIES" back if prosecuted 1948 its 2024 NOW..
Abhinav Chandrachud brought up some very valid points on CAA.
Faye, you are doing a wonderful job 🙂
Very contestable points*
Yeah, extremely valid
Like why not Jews from these 3 countries
As if they exist
Or like why not Parsis from Iran
As if Parsi is a religion
Why do refugees in EU, UK and America convert to Christianity to fast track their citizenship process?? It is because these countries have easier n quicker citizenship process for Christian’s refugees!! Are they discriminating against other religions?? Are those not ‘secular’ countries??
UK n many EU countries have Anglo Christianity or Christianity as their official religion. So calling them ‘ secular’ itself is a Joke! But that’s a whole different argument😅
@@sambitacharya24 The religion is called Zoroastrianism and its followers in India are known as Parsis or Iranis.
Already India has 140 crore people why do we need more people.
How about deport 2 crore Illegal Bangaldeshi and Rohingya muslim refuges from India?
Lol.. good one. The point is these Hindus will only increase BJP vote bank.
Bcz they are already here
Please1 Go and have some basic knowledge first they are already living in India from decades.
you should have added illegal Rohanigya's a nd Bangladeshi {M} in country .. Please add that tooo NO Illegal Muslims also
Every Indian must hear each and every word uttered by those who oppose CAA. Only then public will be able to identify the snakes in our backyard. By attending CAA case, opposition has dug its own grave
CAA is anti discriminatory policies of Muslim countries in Pak AFG Bang
Article 14 also allows categorization. Otherwise, a man can challenge that he is not equal in law with regards to the age of marriage.
Thanks for giving non dramatic explanation. All the channels are being so biased and dramatic while reporting this .
What proof of persecution need to be given by the sections seeking Indian citizenship under the CAA?? Don't we already know on the basis of the regular media, internet and the social media how the minorities of Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan are being hounded , intimidated and violated in these countries purely on religious grounds?!!😮
Why should the Indian Muslim fear either the CAA or the NRC? Every Indian Muslim will have some documentation to prove their domicile of India - property documents, education records, social security documents, bank accounts and every document related to that. It is nothing more than fear mongering and the distinct identity of these groups to go against the national narrative and interests- a ghetto mentality if not also separatist.
Key words are: Religious Prosecution from Pak, Afg and Ban.
Ms Faye - Please you should have added - that Mr nehru and Mahatma Gandhi agreed to take them in 1948 -very bad not open reporting
Outstanding explanation on NRC, CAA etc. Legal migrants under asylam Vs. Illigal Migrants
Peaceful Community
.
.
For CAA: why are you treating us differently?
For UCC: why are you treating us equally ??
Such a well presented and informative explanation. It is a fact that providing refuge in India for those who are in the minority and subject to persecution in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan, is addressing a long standing problem that is in the traditon of this great country of providing shelter and refuge to those minorites in other countries, throughout its history. Muslims in the three countries are not in the minority and are not persecuted, hence there is no need nor necessity to be given shelter in India. Myanmar is another matter and it is sad that some political parties are leveraging their vote bank with the help of illegal migrants from Myanmar via another country. It is clear now that the CAA is a just and equitable solution for people who were persecuted in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan.
During Partition, M population got two new countries. What did Hindus get?
well done, very truth full and not propaganda like godi channels
Can you provide your voice in form of podcast as well. CZcams is only "OK".
The next time Shaheen bagh takes place....their food supplies shud be cut and adhaar cards must be checked....half of the rioters wont attend
Excelent explanation of CAA.Pros and Cons explained very calmly. Thank you.
India was partitioned on basis of religion two islamic state created only for Muslims, where jihadis wiped out non-Muslims but no Librandu secular intellectual felt discrimination. while despite of loosing 24% land remaining India again became 2nd largest Muslim country no body felt muslim got double, eating cake and having it too. While by any rational ligic its difficult to understand how and why bringing in perpetrators of jihadi terrorism with victim required CAA will help. I think it will help in thier long cherushed Gazwa e hind 2047.
Very well explained goven the complexity of the case, focus on technicality becomes more important sometimes rather than just a personal opinion on the ethics of it
All welcome 🙏
Why do refugees in EU, UK and America convert to Christianity to fast track their citizenship process?? It is because these countries have easier n quicker citizenship process for Christian’s refugees!! Are they discriminating against other religions?? Are that not ‘secular’ countries??
UK n many EU countries have Anglo Christianity or Christianity as their official religion. So calling them ‘ secular’ itself is a Joke! But that’s a whole different argument😅
What truth is left in the Murderes of Justice Loya.
Pinarayi Vijayan already has a detention centre started in kerala🤷🏽♀️ that old man is protesting to please the minorities.
Why he can’t, aren’t minorities Indians as well. If bjp can prioritise majority he can do that too
But stop asking funded by Hindus money from centre 😂😂😂@@Renotalks
@@Renotalks of course he can, no issue. If he is prioritising minorities over majorities, he should also stop preaching secularism to the central government, because his government clearly isn’t. Atleast BJP is honest. Either treat everyone equally or atleast have the guts to admit they aren’t.
Which country makes it easy for foreigners to get citizenship and super difficult for poor citizens to prove their citizenship? Leave aside the academic questions of equality and secularism. One million Hindus in Assam have been excluded from the NRC because they could not produce the required documents from the 1970's. Now take a Bangladeshi Hindu who only has to show 10 years residence to get citizenship. The Hindu who could not produce 50 year old documents will languish in detention camp while the Bangladeshi will be welcomed as an Indian citizen. Why is no one talking about this absurd situation?
Totally agree. The government is trying to implement a system which is already so flawed, along with its despicably flawed execution in an area where people suffered from natural calamities that only focused on saving oneself and not the documents.
When waft law, muslom personal law, shahbano judgements are based on religious lines now why complain for this specific law? Isn’t this exposing ur bias n bigotry!!
One of the most unbiased view I've seen on caa and nrc. Thanks faye
unbiased but not complete
How does changing time requirement from 11yrs to 6yrs affect Muslims when NRC is implemented!? Muslims in India have obviously been living in India for more than 11 yr so what’s the fuss?
It will only affect Muslims living in India for less than 11yr, and other religions mentioned in CAA living in India for less than 6yrs.
And religion is not the qualifier for CAA, the qualifier is “Religious Persecution”. Why does everyone keep getting it wrong? Is it that hard to understand? Just like how “social and educational backwardness” is qualifier for OBC reservation which is therefore not against A-14.
Rohingyas should be immediately stopped feom entering W Bengal, and the onea who entered illegally should be deported, or the state will be doomed soon.
Hi! I think this is very nicely compiled and very rightly highlights that Assam is fighting against illegal migrants in general and not on the basis of religion. But when talking about the problems with CAA, maybe it will help people understand the stance of Assam better if you could also highlight how this act is in violation of the historic Assam Accord of 1985 and the six-year long anti-foreigner agitation. Just my opinion. Thank You!
Indians are procicuted in these countries either on religious or on the basis they being Indians who embraced Islam. .it is for govt to consider. .
Pakistan can introduce CAA for Indian Muslims, if any Indian Muslims face issue in India Pakistan should come up with law where they will give citizenship to Indian Muslims, we Indians have no problem wit it
I think many ordinary people are dreading the NRC, anticipating long and frustrating queues reminiscent of the note bandhi days 😮😮😮 anyway good job Faye
NRC is coming NEXT dont worry !! please sign up for protest in Delhi
There is absolutely nothing wrong with CAA, those who are spreading lies about it like kejriwal should be held responsible for any riots or communal violence due to this. Those who are against this act are the most non secular people claiming to be secular, if they can't see persecution of minorities in pak bangladesh who are native to our country, there is no place for them except India and they were not asked by radcliffe or congress whether you want to be a pakistani or indian it came as a shock for them which haunts them till today. You may link it with nrc and draw your own conclusions but caa as a standalone act is absolutely correct, these countries were divided on the basis of religion so citizenship should be granted on the basis of religion. I see no point for an indian muslim to feel threatened by it. But i don't blame them even when the cream of the indian muslims like farhan akhtar stands in the protest without knowing the reason for it, baaki toh it's easy to manipulate and instigate communal tension for absolutely no reason. People were killed in delhi 2020 for absolutely no reason and the blood of them is in the hands of these so called secular and left. Lastly i will just say one thing sab religion ko apna desh mil gaya, hinduon ko apna desh nhi mila, hindus in so called hindu majority state is treated as a 6th class citizen where we had to prove the birthplace of Shree Ram, If this is your secularism i stand against this kind of secularism.
Article 14 apply on INDIANS ! NOT on pakistani
Controversial statements that just living in India will be enough to be given citizenship and also saying proving about their lineages, paradoxical behavior
#whatIsWrongWithCAA
CAA is a must need bill.
Why should oppressor community get privileges which are essentially meant for the oppressed!!
CAA is not against India citizenship but it is in favour of Persecuted minorities lived in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan.
Muslims logic in India
CAA - All religion should be treated equally.
UCC - All religion should not be treated equally.
Prove the thesis by giving citizenship to 19lakh+ non-citizens in Assam.
Thankyou for this video
The biggest question is any terrorist could also granted the indian citizenship aa we have to rely on documents made by other country about their identity. How you will identify anyone whose identity is altered in documents.
They can come without any thing.
Why they will opt in first place ???
Why there are high number of Bongladesh ??
Need scrutiny like MOSSAD and then no issue - I think RAW should be invloved to look for ??????
But I am trying to help people from Pakistan to settle in Delhi and seen videos and talked to them - NOT ONE DOES LOOK like or sound like
NOT look like terrorists
@@hempepe7 would you will ask Pakistan/bangladesh to verify the migrants? What is the criteria. Process will be too opaque with almost no visibility to Indian agencies. The amount of resources spent to verifying a single migrant will be too much.
The CAA is a fulfillment of our promise to all non-Muslims who were left behind in Pakistan at the time of Partition. The two countries had, at the time of Partition, pledged that they would not discriminate against their minorities. While India has kept it's pledge, Pakistan and the earstwhile East Pakistan (Bangladesh) have not. India is redeeming it's pledge
i am bangladesh, my people dont waste tiem to do persecution of hindus stop lieing you bas
Top journalism. hope is still left
Always adding clarity, thanks 😊
Does this bill focus on all Muslim-majority countries worldwide and all Muslims globally? My understanding is that it specifically targets selected countries, a decision that stems from the historical division of the Indian subcontinent based on religion. On one hand, India, the host country, was divided, leading to the creation of Pakistan and Bangladesh in the name of the Muslim religion. On the other hand, the same host country, India, is expected to accept people from Pakistan and Bangladesh, who share the same religion. Why not merge these countries with India and eliminate discrimination based on religion?
Lucid explanation. Thanks
Can Modi the PM of our great Nation give a press meet on CAA to give a clarity on this issue.
Cmon India 🇮🇳
Suprime Court shouldn't act like a puppet of the current dispensation in some sad.
Watch the response from external affairs minister... on US objection to CAA....
Better hurry up, the last date of arrival was declared as December 31,2014 - very soon, it will be 31.12.2024 and then all and sundry will be eligible to apply for citizenship too 😂😂
YESSSSSSS very well said
no 31.12.2047
nice breakdown
Thanks!
Thank you so much!
Very useful exlanation👌
Why this CAA will not help bengali hindus-
1. This act is only for the ppl who has got exemption in passport and foreigner act.. Roughly around 31000 ppl.. Most of them are from today's Pakistan and not bangladesh.. Not a single bengali hindu family will get citizenship from this rather there is a fear of becoming self declared illigal immigrants
Very good 👍 Faye keep it going
There wasno need for CAA.As such granting Cititizenship was as per government rules and discretion. They could have granted citizenship as such .But this government is more interested in playing Hindu card by deliberately bashing Muslims. Tragedy is many Hindus are misled that is what the aim of BJP government
Modiji promised to bring back black money and look what he's doing now. Dividing masses on the basis of religion!
How are you my most respected madam? We Bangalorians miss you ma'am.
im from syhlet district in bangladesh and syhlet was part of assam before parttion. as i seen on debates in past between muslims and tribal hindus the tribals and hindus was always against muslim bengalie migrants but more recently they saying all outsiders but in past debates i heard mainly discrimination against bengalie muslims
অ্যারে ভাই কিতা খবর আপনার বালা নি 😂
We have to get out of the bindings of the word "Secular". To prevent further balkanization of India, Bharat, illegal muslim immigrants have to be weeded out. Otherwise the backlash of a silent majority will lead to maximum bloodshed.
WHY THE PEOPLE OF ASSAM DON'T WANT "CAA"???......,
_
1) it violates "assam accord" in assam andolan 800+ assamese died protesting against these bangladeshis, implementing CAA will be disrespectful towards those people and for us!
2) muslim or non muslim, every illegal bangladeshi is same for us, no matter what religion they follow!
3) don't get brainwashed, it's a total different case for assam compare to other states, coz assam is a bordering state, and it's so obvious that assam will be affected the most from it, not the other states.
4) compare to other states, lakh lakh bangladeshi is still living in assam and tripura illegally, now after giving citizenship, they'll get move to other states or live in assam? Obviously most of them in assam!
5) as you know NRC in assam already got implemented! but nothing has done till then only a draft report was released in 2018 which says around 40 lakh people couldn't give proper documents, proving that they are citizen of India according to NRC rules! (This number includes all religion), now after implementing CAA maximum of them will get citizenship here legally excluding muslims only! Still it will be huge number, even the largest tribe of Assam doesn't have this much of population which are living here for centuries, imagine being a minority in our own land.
6) look at tripura also, tribal population were majority back then but now they are minority in their own land, and Bengali Hindus and muslims from Bangladesh is in majority! And tribals were the one who had been living there for centuries.
6) after getting indian citizenship, bangladeshis will able to buy land from any area of Assam legally, and occupy government jobs equally! In some years yall see the increasing competition for jobs, and mostly next generation will get affected badly in assam!
7) government cannot even take care of us and giving citizenship to more people gonna make more chaos
8) remember it's not religion issue in northeast states, it's for our language and culture. We will choose our language and culture first anyday over any kind of religion!!
9) we will never give our land to a bangladeshi!!
_
_
WHAT PEOPLE OF ASSAM WANT?
_
1) NRC without CAA and inner line permit (ILP)
2) NRC+CAA in assam will remove only bangladeshi muslim people from assam, but ONLY NRC gonna remove all illegal bengali hindus, all illegal muslims, I mean irrespective of religion from assam, we want to remove all bangladeshi.
2) government can implement CAA in other states but should exclude ASSAM and tripura from it, As we already are affected so much, and will get affected more
3) ILP will prevent other illegal immigrants to enter assam
4) government can implement CAA anywhere but exclude northeast states who are already affected!! We need only NRC+ILP.
Assam accord has no constitutional validity and its against principle of India’s partition.
@@KumarK-cn1sj it was signed after six years of ASSAM MOVEMENT so do ur homework done clearly and don't interfere in our matter
@@hellooukittyy
I know it but it doesnot change the facts I mentioned in my last comment . CAA law isnot your internal matter and NRC never meant to remove Hindu refugees , it was only for illegal immigrants who are Muslims .
@@KumarK-cn1sj lol NRC is already implemented in assam and the final report says around 19 lakh couldn't give proper documents which includes all the religion!! So stop playing your religion card here and don't interfere!
@@KumarK-cn1sj we don't care u hindu or muslim, if u came from bangladesh, then u r illegal !!
No problem at all 💪💪💪
Does article 14 apply to non citizens as well? As we are talking about illegal immigrants. I just want to know if that argument has a legal standing.
legals will not be affected. its all about illegal immigration, from trespassing borders or forging documents. If not solved soon then we will just end up like europe and american nations with hoods forming in the cities dividing the natives and immigrants.
Why do refugees in EU, UK and America convert to Christianity to fast track their citizenship process?? It is because these countries have easier n quicker citizenship process for Christian’s refugees!! Are they discriminating against other religions?? Are that not ‘secular’ countries??
UK n many EU countries have Anglo Christianity or Christianity as their official religion. So calling them ‘ secular’ itself is a Joke! But that’s a whole different argument😅
Nope , it doesn’t.
The problem is that this Union Government forgot the Srilankan tamils who have been seeking refuge in Tamil Nadu for decades together. This is just a stupid move
Ethnic persecution not religious persecution
@@rajashashankgutta4334 why are we being selective on what kind of persecution we will support? It doesn't make any sense.
When you have said, only 30K will be benefited from this, why you haven't listed the # of illegal muslim immigrants in our country?
Very educational 👍🏼
irrespective of religion many refugees want to go to europe or middle east rather come and live in india in these times
It is citizenship amendment Act not citizen amendment Act
What BJP doesn't realize.. is how India got to the current position. .someone needs to read Freakonomics..
Unequivocally, and Unquestionably I support CAA and you to when you support CAA YOU will feel happy with reduced economic burden of UNWANTED GUESTS and ILLETERATE and NOTORIOUS.
For the informed citizens of Bharat to know that CAA is a historical and monumental decision of Modiji Government.
The economic benefits over rule all other controversy Humanitarianly not materialistically.
Financial aspect.. I like this one.. I'll explain how CAA & NRC is actually beneficial for our country.
CAA is applicable only for those refugees who have come to India on or before the 2014 deadline and have been persecuted for religious reasons. So no new refugees will get Citizenship under CAA, stating again NO NEW REFUGEES.
This eases the economic burden of refugees on others ie Resident Indians.
They number around a few lakhs at the max.
Coming to the point of NRC, it will help identify those people who have come to India for economic reasons like Bangladeshis. There are millions of Bangladeshis in India just for economic reasons.
If NRC is implemented correctly, it will help identify these people, and help send them back to Bangladesh. This will help reduce a huge burden on our economy and free a lot of resources.
These resources can be used for the Genuine citizens of India and help improve our economy.
Just look at the destruction caused by Islamist terrorists in the name of so called protests against a democratically elected parliament’s act
Rs 25,000 crore loss estimated in Delhi riots
A price to pay just because this divided Bharat dared to give refuge to non muslims terrorized in three Islamic countries created from land of Bharat by force.
What was the reason that Ankit Sharma was stabbed 400 times and streets of national capital turned into a islamic war zone?
There is not a decimal of criticism anyone who understand economics will criticize.
So far the APPEASERS ie CONGRESS the ANARCHIST ie Kejriwal and the ABSENT MINDED ie Prejudiced against Modi can not see LIGHT in this.
So far for 76 years it was
There is an old gujarati saying … “Ghar na chokra ghanti chhate ane padosi ne rotlo..”
Unequivocally, and Unquestionably I support CAA and you to when you support will feel happy with reduced economic burden of UNWANTED GUESTS
I don't get this. Why should Indian citizens be upset over this? We are citizens and we can prove we are citizens, right? What is the problem here? The problem will only be for those who are not citizens, am I right?
I would actually argue for Assam slightly different. If BD hindus come in through CAA, they wont be allowed to live in Assam but anywhere else in India (inner line permit)- so CAA will remove BD hindus from Assam and NRC will remove BD muslims… so it serves the perfect purpose.