@@A-SavageRedneck Have you had a malfunction due to a buffer tube? If you’re answer is yes, you’re a liar. I promise you, I have several and they have been put to the test. This video is marketing, and that’s fine. Buffer tubes don’t just break. If you’re pretending that you have had that problem, it ain’t just me that sees the bs, it’s a whole bunch of us. That being said, please, buy you a handful of these fine buffer tubes or receiver extensions if you like. Make a video for us dummies and teach us something.
I would love to see a video colaberation with you all ( Brownells Team ) and School of the American Rifle Team, even make a Matched Lower and upper set.. as a combined Team. I am fans of both of you all and think you all are top notch!
SOTAR doesn't like to promote any products related to the rifle itself, preferring to gauge out products to see whether or not they are properly sized for function. That said, I would also like to see that ;)
Many FCD parts are for the flex. While they bring some improvements, they aren’t usually that big of a deal. And I say this as a person that owns FCD and paid a premium for it. If the buffer tube/receiver extension is not a5, then it’s not a substantial upgrade. Being forged is a pre requisite, drain holes and 6 positions are pre requisites. Even if it was an extrusion the threads on it are still the weakest point and would be what fails if the gun is repeatedly abused on that juncture (I.e. prying stuff with the buffer tube)
FCD is one of the (if not the best) AR parts suppliers..I never heard the impact extruded alum is stronger than forged before..Great info..I only wish the class of threads the tube has was given..
Like anything, one must decide what one can consider good quality with the limits of what one can afford. And for what purpose and how frequently it will be used. There’s always going to be something better, but can I afford to build my AR for 15K or do I consider the 1K AR that I build acceptable for my uses? If someone can afford many enhanced and improved AR parts, go for it, I’m happy for you. But if you decide that the milspec AR that you have meets your needs well, that is great too.
@@mblake0420 Never used one in the 42 years i've used the ar15. Including 12 years in the service. There's no situation that a FA can fix that pulling the charging handle can't also fix.
Odd there's no anti-tilt provision for those that run a external piston gun . Wouldn't be very much trouble to include it in the manufacturing process I would think . It would be nice to have in case you change to a piston gun upper or swap uppers regularly. It wouldn't affect or harm the operation of a traditional AR15 IMHO . A better to have it and not need it feature as opposed to needing it ( bolt carrier on external piston guns tilting and gouging up your lower for example ) situation. Me , I just like having as many options as I can get for my money . Just seems it could slightly be a even better product without overly complicating the manufacture of the extension . Just my humble 2 cents ...
@@3cap97 the only time I've heard of a buffer tube breaking was a friend that was in the army. He fell out of a truck, broke his leg, and got his rifle run over. It broke the stock and buffer tube. I wouldn't call that normal use.
I like this but why do a normal buffer tube? Make this to the PWS or a Aero Precision enhanced buffer tube dimensions. Where the buffer tube juts out from the bottom and cups the carrier group making a tight fit of the upper and lower receiver ...
So basically its virtually not much better than a standad reciever tube. It is "moderately" stronger than a traditional tube that has been serving the military for decades now, multiple foreign militaries and insurgents alike. Basically, buy the BCM or VLTOR A5 and youre way ahead of the game than this Forward Controls one.
@@CaptainCreampie69while the VLTOR isn't technically mil-spec, it's widely regarded as a better design. It offers higher cyclic reliability, and mildly softer recoil. As far as I know, it doesn't have any downsides compared to the carbine system other than being slightly longer, and requiring a VLTOR specific buffer.
@@tonytable1537 forged has to be thicker because they are removing most of the material internally on the tube. School of the americna rifle has a great video on this very subject
I'm new to putting together ARs rather than buying a complete gun, and I quickly realized there comes a point where you're just paying extra for logos. But I'm a capitalist, so who cares anyway.
C'mon man! Caleb is losing credibility quickly with me....duck logos and numbered gradations.....REALLY? "Stronger" -- I have not heard of any "buffer tube catastrophic failures in the field". However, if you think you NEED to have an "improved" receiver extension -- take a look at the Aero Precision "Enhanced Buffer Tube". Although without ducks and dual sided numbering --- there are a couple of features on the AP product that are noteworthy. And it too is 7075 Aluminum!
Caleb, here's a myth; You should use a 6160 charging handle because a 7075 charging handle will wear down your upper reciver.
Lmao, by that logic the carrier should also be 6160?😂
@JohnZ556 right? And that thing is reciprocating like mad, more shearing than that charging handle will ever do.
6061*
@@JohnZ556that's why it's a myth
Forward Controls comes out with a crush washer. Caleb: this is best crush washer; it is better than all other crush washers
Never had a problem with standard buffer tubes. In fact, I’ve never even heard of any problem with any buffer tube.
Must not use ya weapons in a serious manner
@@A-SavageRedneck Have you had a malfunction due to a buffer tube? If you’re answer is yes, you’re a liar. I promise you, I have several and they have been put to the test. This video is marketing, and that’s fine. Buffer tubes don’t just break. If you’re pretending that you have had that problem, it ain’t just me that sees the bs, it’s a whole bunch of us. That being said, please, buy you a handful of these fine buffer tubes or receiver extensions if you like. Make a video for us dummies and teach us something.
@@jeremyb251 maybe if you have to “mortar” your rifle many, many times, that could cause an issue? Not sure, just speaking about possibilities.
@@lucasblanchard47 AGREED
@@jeremyb251I’ve seen many malfunctions cause by improper buffer weight. Does that count?
I would love to see a video colaberation with you all ( Brownells Team ) and School of the American Rifle Team, even make a Matched Lower and upper set.. as a combined Team. I am fans of both of you all and think you all are top notch!
SOTAR doesn't like to promote any products related to the rifle itself, preferring to gauge out products to see whether or not they are properly sized for function.
That said, I would also like to see that ;)
Many FCD parts are for the flex. While they bring some improvements, they aren’t usually that big of a deal. And I say this as a person that owns FCD and paid a premium for it.
If the buffer tube/receiver extension is not a5, then it’s not a substantial upgrade. Being forged is a pre requisite, drain holes and 6 positions are pre requisites. Even if it was an extrusion the threads on it are still the weakest point and would be what fails if the gun is repeatedly abused on that juncture (I.e. prying stuff with the buffer tube)
FCD is one of the (if not the best) AR parts suppliers..I never heard the impact extruded alum is stronger than forged before..Great info..I only wish the class of threads the tube has was given..
Ducks and dimples are just perfect for your modern ar15
Drainage holes are important if you ever recover your guns from a boating accident :)
Like anything, one must decide what one can consider good quality with the limits of what one can afford. And for what purpose and how frequently it will be used.
There’s always going to be something better, but can I afford to build my AR for 15K or do I consider the 1K AR that I build acceptable for my uses?
If someone can afford many enhanced and improved AR parts, go for it, I’m happy for you. But if you decide that the milspec AR that you have meets your needs well, that is great too.
Slick side receivers are the GOAT
Until you need a foward assist
@@mblake0420 Never used one in the 42 years i've used the ar15. Including 12 years in the service. There's no situation that a FA can fix that pulling the charging handle can't also fix.
@@mblake0420use your finger, works just as good!!
My sample size of one indicates that Cerakote is not as durable as anodizing. It has some nice features, but anodizing will look better longer.
I swear Caleb somehow accessed my build list for my LWRC lower I’m gonna get started on pretty soon 😅
You could do a video on all the different firearm finishes. Pros, cons, and uses.
Got one of the 9 position ones for a 308 build.
Odd there's no anti-tilt provision for those that run a external piston gun . Wouldn't be very much trouble to include it in the manufacturing process I would think . It would be nice to have in case you change to a piston gun upper or swap uppers regularly. It wouldn't affect or harm the operation of a traditional AR15 IMHO . A better to have it and not need it feature as opposed to needing it ( bolt carrier on external piston guns tilting and gouging up your lower for example ) situation. Me , I just like having as many options as I can get for my money . Just seems it could slightly be a even better product without overly complicating the manufacture of the extension .
Just my humble 2 cents ...
You can't pick color on the site. Only black.
I like it. I hope they add it to Brownells Spain !!!!.🇪🇸
Cerakote cool it chips and scratches easily.
Have they done butt stroke test yet? lol
Recoil reciever extension I like it.
Is there an actual problem with buffer tube breaking? I haven't heard of anyone breaking one during normal use.
...."normal use"....or..... EVER!
@@3cap97 the only time I've heard of a buffer tube breaking was a friend that was in the army. He fell out of a truck, broke his leg, and got his rifle run over. It broke the stock and buffer tube. I wouldn't call that normal use.
"Receiver extension" -- don't try to church it up, son. Just call it a buffer tube🤣
I like this but why do a normal buffer tube? Make this to the PWS or a Aero Precision enhanced buffer tube dimensions. Where the buffer tube juts out from the bottom and cups the carrier group making a tight fit of the upper and lower receiver ...
Hasn't there been an improved version of this very item before this FC-duck product?
So basically its virtually not much better than a standad reciever tube. It is "moderately" stronger than a traditional tube that has been serving the military for decades now, multiple foreign militaries and insurgents alike. Basically, buy the BCM or VLTOR A5 and youre way ahead of the game than this Forward Controls one.
He literally says it is stronger than the traditional military standard ones. That’s what a BCM is. VLTOR A5 isn’t a military specification…🤦🏽♂️
@@CaptainCreampie69while the VLTOR isn't technically mil-spec, it's widely regarded as a better design. It offers higher cyclic reliability, and mildly softer recoil. As far as I know, it doesn't have any downsides compared to the carbine system other than being slightly longer, and requiring a VLTOR specific buffer.
Gotta get the duck that that Instagram flex.
Meh, VLTOR A5 or the new BCM buffer tube for improvements
The problem with calling it a receiver extension is you can't say "toob"
Impact extrusion buffer tube has been around for a long time
This is what I remembered. Didn't the used to have to also be thicker/heavier to achieve the same strength?
@@tonytable1537 forged has to be thicker because they are removing most of the material internally on the tube. School of the americna rifle has a great video on this very subject
Buffer Tube = Receiver Extension
I always heard Colt made the only forged RE.
Technically it's a swan...
is it coated on the inside to reduce buffer tube "twang" ???
Duck gang all the way I understand that better form and materials equal higher cost and I am ok with that
Another solution looking for a problem.
V7 makes a stronger stainless steel alloy buffer tube that is nitrided.
Quack quack
I'm new to putting together ARs rather than buying a complete gun, and I quickly realized there comes a point where you're just paying extra for logos. But I'm a capitalist, so who cares anyway.
I think my receiver extension is steel...
2:35♥️🔥💥💯🥊
That’s a “straight back stock” right? 😂
C'mon man!
Caleb is losing credibility quickly with me....duck logos and numbered gradations.....REALLY?
"Stronger" -- I have not heard of any "buffer tube catastrophic failures in the field".
However, if you think you NEED to have an "improved" receiver extension -- take a look at the Aero Precision "Enhanced Buffer Tube".
Although without ducks and dual sided numbering --- there are a couple of features on the AP product that are noteworthy.
And it too is 7075 Aluminum!
Quack
Who the duck?!😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
🦆 🦆 🦆