I don't get why so many people are upset with them using mercedes parts, it is the best idea they could have come up with. You can finally get the stunning looks and the high class feel of an Aston Martin, with the reliability of a Mercedes. And if something breaks it is easier and cheaper to repair. Also you have an enterteinmentsystem that hasn't been outdated for 10 years 😅 And for the People saying it is an C-class motor that is the same engine as in the amg gts, which isn't that much cheaper at a high trimlevel than the db11...
I completely agree with this whole statement, except for the “reliability of a Mercedes” Mercedes as well as German cars are known for being luxurious, but extremely unreliable.
What makes the Aston Martin DB11 Volante so good is that for a car design so visually appealing, the driver has the option to either drive conventional style with the roof closed or convertible style without the roof. That is what makes this car so attractive. And the car price is just slightly over US $200,000 which is reasonable and affordable for most people. Not everyone can afford to drive a high end, super expensive Bugatti which easily costs a few million dollars.
Finally an Aston Martin with an engine where if something goes wrong (which happens frequently with these cars) you don't have to live in NYC, Miami, or LA to get it serviced!
Really want to justify this car based on its gorgeous looks. Unfortunately, after having had a C63 Cab, I couldn’t get past having the same powertrain in an Aston. Past Aston’s had linear, smooth power bands…
Rémi ESTELLE Pillars are the vertical or near vertical supports of a car's window area designated respectively as the A, B, C If you’re looking at the car from the side. The A Pillar is for the front window. The B Pillar is behind the front door. And the C-Pillar is for the rear window It’s hard to explain without showing you. I would suggest googling the question.
This car is absolutely stunning .....I am torn between this car and the Ferrari California T/ Portofino! The Ferrari advantage is having the retractable hardtop!
Is Chris Harris officially not connected to Drive in any capacity? We know he's doing Top Gear now full time but saw him here from time to time before.
I never understood Aston Martin. The car weighs 3900 lbs, the transmission isnt bespoke, the engine is from another company, and this thing costs 6 figures. It doesnt make any sense. Its a beautiful car don't get me wrong but really.
Leave aside the weight -- it's a large luxury GT not a sports car, so its weight is part of the product positioning -- and the transmission -- most automakers use transmissions from other suppliers like ZF. What you're reacting to are the development compromises that go with Aston Martin's small size and independence. Most of its competitors are affiliated with larger automakers that have massive R&D operations. The standout is McLaren, which is larger and organized around F1 development. While Daimler has a 5% stake in Aston (note the AMG engines and electronics), Aston would never survive without strategic development partners. It doesn't mean the product isn't competitive, in fact, those compromises have made the current models MORE competitive than ever.
I just don't understand it in the marketplace. Any 200k plus car should come close to a 10 second quarter mile or it isn't worth it. See Porsche 911 Turbo S, Lamborghini Huracan, Ferrari 488GTB, any of the Mclaren vehicles etc. To me the if I wanted a luxury GT car I would look at the I would look at the Jaguar F-type. The most expensive sets at $120-130k and isn't in the same category as a "supercar" so no one would expect it to compete in that class. And if I am not mistake the engine at least is developed/engineered in house.
I get your point, and it's a good one. I'd argue that judging a car based on its performance numbers is not the most sustainable proposition in the GT class, but it is a selling point to some buyers. And with that engine, it does seem like the DB11 V8 is a $220k+ car competing with $130k cars. That's a tricky situation, no doubt. From behind the wheel, the difference between this car and the Jaguar F-Type or AMG GT is significant in terms of comfort and roadability (for a 500-mile autobahn burn, I'd choose the Aston in a heartbeat). We'll see in the marketplace whether it's $100k+ more significant.
Guess how has an engine from another company, an outdated (yet bespoke and made from another company) transmission, shity electronics, and costs 7 figures? Pagani's do, just because most of the metal is the same, doesn't mean it is the same experience, and experience is why buy a car better than a Dacia (that just do what is supposed to), this Aston is great, and having MB parts on it probably makes it a bit more reliable.
You're looking at Aston Martin all wrong with checking out it's performance figures. It's still very fast, but it's point is being a luxury grand tourer. It's the middle ground between an all-out sports car, and an all-out luxury car such as a Rolls-Royce or Bentley. Why would you spend more on a Rolex when you can get a Casio to do the same thing? It's all about desirability and Aston Martin's pedigree and expertise in this small segment of the motor industry is what warrants the price.
You don't believe it corners better due to better dampers, suspension components and stiffer chassis? I think it has less to do with crash test and safety regulations and alot more to do with engineers responding to market demand for better handling open top GT cars.
I'm only asking because you are the expert, so what you say is pretty much what it is and I'm very interested in the topic. You have a wealth of knowledge and I respect the incredible channel you have made for us
Don't amplify one point into infinity. In context of convertibles in the past, the Volante has less twist and scuttle shake as a direct result of a stiffer chassis. One of the reasons for that stiffer chassis is the greater structural integrity that went along with crash-test ratings and regulations. The major point is that chassis engineers who start with a more rigid body structure end up with better wheel location, and drivers get a more responsive drive when body flex doesn't act as a damper.
Aston should have made another model besides the DB11 and the Vantage to stick the AMG V8 into. The big GT and the sport car only deserve that glorious V12.
so they should build their own engine that wouldn't be as reliable, efficient and most likely perform worse. To top it off it would make the cat even more expensive. Seems like a great trade of....
I'm guessing you're American and only judge a car on how big it is and how powerful its engine is. Fortunately, we Europeans have a bit more class than that and the DB11 and a C Class aren't even comparable in our eyes.
Possibly the worlds worst interior for a "super car" ??? Fake metal, Plastic air vents.. a dash that looks like it was designed 15 years ago. Cheap materials... Ffs. AM. The exterior is awesome, but who signed off the shit interior????
Halt Dein blödes Mundwerk und fahr... sonst nehme ich Abstand von diesem Auto. Du ..und Dein Geschwätz stören... oder hällst Du uns für so blöd? daß wir Deine Erklärungen & Kommentare brauchen?
Never put the top up unless the storm has a name.
...that's so good, I'm stealing it and claiming it as my own! Originality is about concealing the source...
Bingo. This is what makes this Aston Martin DB11 Volante so damn sexy. I would love to own one of these together with an Aston Martin DBX707 SUV.
I don't get why so many people are upset with them using mercedes parts, it is the best idea they could have come up with. You can finally get the stunning looks and the high class feel of an Aston Martin, with the reliability of a Mercedes. And if something breaks it is easier and cheaper to repair.
Also you have an enterteinmentsystem that hasn't been outdated for 10 years 😅
And for the People saying it is an C-class motor that is the same engine as in the amg gts, which isn't that much cheaper at a high trimlevel than the db11...
I completely agree with this whole statement, except for the “reliability of a Mercedes” Mercedes as well as German cars are known for being luxurious, but extremely unreliable.
What makes the Aston Martin DB11 Volante so good is that for a car design so visually appealing, the driver has the option to either drive conventional style with the roof closed or convertible style without the roof. That is what makes this car so attractive. And the car price is just slightly over US $200,000 which is reasonable and affordable for most people. Not everyone can afford to drive a high end, super expensive Bugatti which easily costs a few million dollars.
MUCH better looking than the coupe. Gorgeous car.
This thing looks so much better than the coupe version. Absolutely stunning when the top is down.
Stunning car inside and out
Astons on a roll
Gorgeous car - went in one before they were up for sale incredible engine sound and power delivery.
Finally an Aston Martin with an engine where if something goes wrong (which happens frequently with these cars) you don't have to live in NYC, Miami, or LA to get it serviced!
Great point.
Luckily I live I. Nyc but sadly I can't afford that, fuck my lige
Aston Martins are the best looking cars in the world!!
This is one of the rare times a convertible looks better than the coupe version.
J.Chan Absolutely! The back looks hideous as a coupe...
I prefer the coupe
J.Chan One of the best looking convertibles I've ever seen at that.
I think describing an Aston Martin as 'hideous' is a bit far.
What? Convertibles look better than their coupé counterparts most of the time.
Awesome review for a fantastic sportscar!! Could you please share the background music titles?
Really want to justify this car based on its gorgeous looks. Unfortunately, after having had a C63 Cab, I couldn’t get past having the same powertrain in an Aston. Past Aston’s had linear, smooth power bands…
That's a beauty. The C-pillar of the coupe ruins the whole car (it looks like it belongs to a Kia or Opel), but the cabrio doesn't have that.
Sami Anttila Completely agree. The wheels are also more aesthetically pleasing.
totally right!
What is a C-pillar? i'm french and this is the first time i read this word.
Rémi ESTELLE Pillars are the vertical or near vertical supports of a car's window area designated respectively as the A, B, C
If you’re looking at the car from the side.
The A Pillar is for the front window.
The B Pillar is behind the front door.
And the C-Pillar is for the rear window
It’s hard to explain without showing you. I would suggest googling the question.
No C-pillar no Air-blade. That’s not well I guess for high speed driving
This car is absolutely stunning .....I am torn between this car and the Ferrari California T/ Portofino! The Ferrari advantage is having the retractable hardtop!
Andrew Ippolito personally i would
get this aston over the Ferrari
I would get the Ferrari over this hands down
This is the first car to compete aesthetically with the Ferrari California. Great observation. 😎
get both
Better looking than the coupe, but still not a huge fan. Still prefer the Vanquish for looks.
Sympa les routes française. Ca fait plaisir.
what a dream car wow
Good review. .....i want one.
Beautiful😘do they have this year's volante in New Zealand yet?DB11VOLANTE.💟
Not feeling the love on this model. But I do love the DB9.
Sojourn Overland DB9 was a high point. Love that car!!
anyone else immediately think of dirt rally in the first few driving shots
wouldn't the weight distribution of the V12 be better?
DBS superleggera volante coming soon 🙌🏿
Bring back Fast Lane Daily!
Wunderschönes Automobil. Zum verlieben
Why the volante doesn't come in a V12....I'll never understand
Supercharger... All I got to say! I can already imagine the performance and the sounds! Just WOW!!!
It's a beautiful car nice sounding engine
Is Chris Harris officially not connected to Drive in any capacity? We know he's doing Top Gear now full time but saw him here from time to time before.
Chris is a host on /DRIVE on NBC Sports, which is The Drive's cable TV show that airs on NBCSN. Otherwise, he's full-time with TopGear.
James Bond where you at
*_SO MANY CARS HAVE SIMILAR DESIGN LINES NOW_*
Its looks classic, 🥰❤️
DB11 Volante*
2:19 I’m pretty sure you have said that people who drive with the roof down but the windows up should be beaten. Just saying.
MyBlueZed I knew someone would bring that up : ). Was getting too much wind noise on the mic, so had to break Farah’s Law.
In luxury cars why nobody makes the v10 anymore it's either mostly v8 and a few v12
I never understood Aston Martin. The car weighs 3900 lbs, the transmission isnt bespoke, the engine is from another company, and this thing costs 6 figures. It doesnt make any sense. Its a beautiful car don't get me wrong but really.
Leave aside the weight -- it's a large luxury GT not a sports car, so its weight is part of the product positioning -- and the transmission -- most automakers use transmissions from other suppliers like ZF. What you're reacting to are the development compromises that go with Aston Martin's small size and independence. Most of its competitors are affiliated with larger automakers that have massive R&D operations. The standout is McLaren, which is larger and organized around F1 development. While Daimler has a 5% stake in Aston (note the AMG engines and electronics), Aston would never survive without strategic development partners. It doesn't mean the product isn't competitive, in fact, those compromises have made the current models MORE competitive than ever.
I just don't understand it in the marketplace. Any 200k plus car should come close to a 10 second quarter mile or it isn't worth it. See Porsche 911 Turbo S, Lamborghini Huracan, Ferrari 488GTB, any of the Mclaren vehicles etc. To me the if I wanted a luxury GT car I would look at the I would look at the Jaguar F-type. The most expensive sets at $120-130k and isn't in the same category as a "supercar" so no one would expect it to compete in that class. And if I am not mistake the engine at least is developed/engineered in house.
I get your point, and it's a good one. I'd argue that judging a car based on its performance numbers is not the most sustainable proposition in the GT class, but it is a selling point to some buyers. And with that engine, it does seem like the DB11 V8 is a $220k+ car competing with $130k cars. That's a tricky situation, no doubt. From behind the wheel, the difference between this car and the Jaguar F-Type or AMG GT is significant in terms of comfort and roadability (for a 500-mile autobahn burn, I'd choose the Aston in a heartbeat). We'll see in the marketplace whether it's $100k+ more significant.
Guess how has an engine from another company, an outdated (yet bespoke and made from another company) transmission, shity electronics, and costs 7 figures? Pagani's do, just because most of the metal is the same, doesn't mean it is the same experience, and experience is why buy a car better than a Dacia (that just do what is supposed to), this Aston is great, and having MB parts on it probably makes it a bit more reliable.
You're looking at Aston Martin all wrong with checking out it's performance figures. It's still very fast, but it's point is being a luxury grand tourer. It's the middle ground between an all-out sports car, and an all-out luxury car such as a Rolls-Royce or Bentley. Why would you spend more on a Rolex when you can get a Casio to do the same thing? It's all about desirability and Aston Martin's pedigree and expertise in this small segment of the motor industry is what warrants the price.
Im buying this within 3 years. I am currently 20. wish me luck
Thank Modern crash test standards for good cornering? So regulation makes cars go around corners better? That's a new one
I mean, not considering the extra weight (some of which you can attribute to NVH additions), the extra stiffness is definitely a side benefit.
It's called cause and effect.
You don't believe it corners better due to better dampers, suspension components and stiffer chassis? I think it has less to do with crash test and safety regulations and alot more to do with engineers responding to market demand for better handling open top GT cars.
I'm only asking because you are the expert, so what you say is pretty much what it is and I'm very interested in the topic. You have a wealth of knowledge and I respect the incredible channel you have made for us
Don't amplify one point into infinity. In context of convertibles in the past, the Volante has less twist and scuttle shake as a direct result of a stiffer chassis. One of the reasons for that stiffer chassis is the greater structural integrity that went along with crash-test ratings and regulations. The major point is that chassis engineers who start with a more rigid body structure end up with better wheel location, and drivers get a more responsive drive when body flex doesn't act as a damper.
Is the top waterproof?
That is one funny question. Why would it not be waterproof?
You should be about optons...right? why not the V8 & 12cyl? 1 less electric car, sooner; if that makes sense. Cheer's from East-Van B.C. Canada
Always keep it 1 0 0 f a m
Ugh, Likely to come with Nerve agent, straight from MI 6
Mark Rice I'd still take it. 😂😌
Vine por el video de Salo Jaja
Am I the only one that prefers the Mercedes s63 amg coupe?
Let's get this straight "bro" there is no convertible that looks better than its coupé equivalent. That's a fact
Why is "bro" in quotes, brah?
THE DRIVE ya wanna fight me brah? 😂
Nah
Elia 458 Spider "bro"
TriHard Cx nope I dont think its better looking.
Don't risk your life by making vedio while driving
keep it one hundred tote bags exist?
Jaguar F Type better value
Only with AMG V8??? What the F... ?
Hii
The new Continental GT blows this out of the water
I’m gonna own one just because I have the same name
I think AMG means-Auto.Matic.Gears😂
Love Spinelli! Hate the Mercedes.
Still just a v8.
This Mercedes has been done for less money....
But this 'Mercedes' has no Mercedes chassis. Or gearbox. Or interior. What's your point?
Aston should have made another model besides the DB11 and the Vantage to stick the AMG V8 into.
The big GT and the sport car only deserve that glorious V12.
lol at the engine wtf
The interior sucks !
lol.. He said "global"..
Beautiful if only it could beat a 670S...
...comparing an Aston Martin to a 'football' player...end of the video.
Ill take the convertible m4 over the coupe any day
A única merda é que compartilha peças ford
Vegetable lasagna!
Too much talking not enough driving
If i wanted that engine I'd buy a c class not an Aston
MegaMarina5 exactly! Aston is lost
Yep! Fucked up...
MegaMarina5 I dunno. I love Aston and AMG Mercs. Seems like a good blend to me.
so they should build their own engine that wouldn't be as reliable, efficient and most likely perform worse. To top it off it would make the cat even more expensive. Seems like a great trade of....
I'm guessing you're American and only judge a car on how big it is and how powerful its engine is. Fortunately, we Europeans have a bit more class than that and the DB11 and a C Class aren't even comparable in our eyes.
Wheels are hideous...
Possibly the worlds worst interior for a "super car" ??? Fake metal,
Plastic air vents.. a dash that looks like it was designed 15 years ago. Cheap materials...
Ffs. AM. The exterior is awesome, but who signed off the shit interior????
Halt Dein blödes Mundwerk und fahr... sonst nehme ich Abstand von diesem Auto. Du ..und Dein Geschwätz stören... oder hällst Du uns für so blöd? daß wir Deine Erklärungen & Kommentare brauchen?