Sony RX10 IV - $1700 P&S Worth it?
Vložit
- čas přidán 21. 07. 2024
- The Sony RX10 IV is an expensive point and shoots but with 600m of zoom, beautiful image quality and serious 4k video features - is it worth it?
➨ My Recommended Gear: kit.co/photorectoby
🎧Get Awesome Music for your videos: photorec.tv/music
🌠 For 10% off your first purchase, go to www.squarespace.com/photorectv
Video info
Buy Links Sony RX10 IV from B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2OEsNLQ
Get Notified about our 2020 trip to Iceland: goo.gl/forms/KvzZaQf1T83cr2M73
RAW Photos SONY RX10 IV www.dropbox.com/sh/wy73270jyo...
🌠 Follow me / photorectoby
💬 Join an awesome community and get the support you need to become a better photographer - Get your work critiqued, get your photography questions answered and so much more photorec.tv/join
Find and Follow me at:
/ photorectoby
photorec.tv
/ photorectoby
/ photorec.tv
500px 500px.com/photorectoby
SUBSCRIBE czcams.com/users/camerarec...
GooglePlus: goo.gl/4iQn2
A corrections, The 1" sensor 13.2x8.8mm (116 square-mm) in the Sony RX10IV are 4 times larger than the 1/2.3" sensor 6.17x 4.55mm (28 square-mm) in the Nikon P1000 !
I am on my way to buy my second Sony RX10 IV. I sold my last one thinking I wanted to up grade to a one of the latest Sony models that hit the market. After spending close to 10 grand on camera and lens, which were really good, I wished I had my RX10 IV back. I quickly got tired of switching lens and carrying them with me. So I sold all my new gear at a lost to me and am on my way to purchase the camera I have dearly missed. Let me say 11x14 prints from the RX10 IV are amazing. I have not printed anything larger but plan to in the future. In my unprofessional opinion the Sony RX10 IV is a great camera. Let me add, the max zoom is super clear. Something other brand competitors has fallen short in being able to match.
Nice style of explaining, good knowledge about photography, good video. keep it up. with a lot of thanks.
Glad to see you took it for a spin :) Great review!
Currently shooting an A7S, but I really miss the RX10iii that I had. Focusing not as good as mk4, but still had PlayMemories apps for Timelapse, Grad Filter and ND.
Bring those back or bake them into the firmware, a little better low light and the swivel screen from the A77/A99 and I could literally be done buying gear.
You mentioned Alaska, just came back after buying this camera a week before I left. Lots of settings to become familiar with, but I came home with some awesome images and 4K video.Still lots to learn about the camera, but I'm happy with it.
Awesome - Glad to hear Kim - feel free to tag me on a few of your favorite ones on Instagram - I'd love to see them!
Had mine for about a year now not had any issues with battery life but do carry two spare ones and yes I have an after market twin charger. Spent three weeks in Ethiopia earlier this year , scenery pictures and then wild life shots all without having to carry spare lens and not take time switching lens when unexpected bird shots became available. Really very pleased with the results
I sold my Canon 70D, Sony A6300 and all my lenses to buy the RX10 IV when it was first released. Best thing I ever did!
Wow that's awesome
I sold my Sony A7ii, 70-200mm, 50mm and I am about to buy this one.
Wow. Thats a commercial for the RX10 IV !
Was it true?
@@nenoneno9591 Yes, It was
Excellent review, I love this camera!!
I have the RX10 Mk1 and it's great for travel. Nice review and nice shots, man.
Great review! I have shot motorsport and Aussie rules, with this little monster. Love it! You can’t take pics with a 600mm lens over your head arms outstretched like you can with this camera. I would even say the auto focus is better than my 1DX. The video is awesome as well 120 frames per sec in full HD then you can do short clips up to 900 frames per sec although not quite full HD. Cheers
Have this camera for almost a year and travel around the world with it.
After a while, I sold my 70D and Tamron 150-600 and never looked back. the best camera ever for landscape, bird photography and family shots. Only for macro I still use the 5Dc with 100mm macro lens. The Sony RX10 m4 is so easy to travel with and so fast. Video 1080 is very crisp and also the 4k video is very good. Fantastic image stabilization. the drawback is the electric zoom, bud you get used to it. Best camera in my opinion ever.
Great video and keep up the great work. greetings from the Netherlands.
I got a 80D and thinking to buy 150-600 or this camera. So RX10 has better photo quality than tamron 150-600 ?
We took this camera to Kenya/Tanzania and it rocked! We fully utilized the zoom function and never let us down.
Really nice video man!
I've this camera as well a A7s and A7R3. The RX10M4 is very versatile and I'm using it mostly during my business trips to insure any subject capture (as you said). The lens quality is insane and the AF super fast and reliable. Yes the price is killing, but the job is done in all conditions....
Nice video. I think there's a lot of arguments to be made for larger sensor bridge cameras. That especially applies to video making. People don't realize that a 1 inch sensor is larger than 16mm film which was used for films.
I have the Canon 77D and the Sony Rx100V. I wanted a 4K camcorder and was going to get the Sony AX700 but got the RX10 IV instead and I love it. Great do it all machine.
I have one of these and by processing my RAW image through Topaz AI Gigapixel, was able to print a huge 1500x1000mm wall print with such eye-watering clarity and details. All from the tiny, comparably, 1" Sony sensor. And, no sensor dust which every interchangeable lens camera suffers from. I'm wrapt!!!
Can you tell me how's the results when you edit low light shots from this camera in Topaz Gigapixel?
i know it's kinda off topic but does anyone know of a good site to watch new tv shows online ?
@Clayton Jad Meh lately I've been using Flixportal. you can find it thru google:) -shane
@Shane Orion thanks, signed up and it seems like a nice service =) I really appreciate it!!
@Clayton Jad happy to help :D
Great review. Thanks. Got the 64K question for you. I’m told you can’t zoom when you’re in tracking modes. Then I read if you set the camera in single point you can shoot at 24 FPS and then can zoom the lens when the bird/dog is coming straight at you ? Have you had that experience or does this sound feasible ? Thanks👏🏻😊👍🦅
Nicely done. Yours is the only RX 10 Mk4 review that's mentioned the "clear view" digital extension capability.
But only works on jpg, not RAW.
I am interested in getting the Sony RX 10 IV. Thanks for this video.
Was wondering why the Panasonic Lumix G9 was on the table throughout the review?
Great review of the RX10, though!
Thanks for the review.
Do you have reviews on other 1" sensor:
- Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 M2 / Leica V-Lux 5
- Panasonic Lumix FZ2500
- Canon Powershot G3X
I guess those ones are really the RX10 rivals?
Thanks
the layout of the controls --- is also incredible. so much to say.
I am looking for a camera for my wildlife CZcams videos (as well as regular travel videos), I shortlisted RX10 4, then later realised camcorders will be better for videos and found Sony FDR AX700 1 inch camcorder but little limited zoom (hope I will get more zoom with clear image). What is your opinion?
Have you used an external recorders with this? Like the Atomos ones?
shockingly good and the last camera i would part with, that lens is sharp whilst reviewers often point out the low light drawback of smaller sensors few are highlighting the poor small detail resolution at distance inherent with tiny sensors not the lens
@PhotoRec TV
Have you done a safari with the RX10 IV?
I want the camera as an addition to my A7RII + 16-35F4. The RX10 IV is so much cheaper as the Sony FE 100-400 + 1,4X Converter AND so much smaller / lightweight.
I use the A7RII for Landscape / Low Light. The RX10 IV would be my wildlife/safari option..
Thank you!
As you mentioned, the 18-400 (with Canon0 EFS) vs RX10 iv between 400mm and 600mm are the decision if they are equal in IQ. Any way to compare the res. of those two lenses apples to apples.
Is it still worth it in 2022? Or should I wait for a newer model (if one is coming sometimes...)?
I purchased this when released, but since then i have the A9 plus A7riv, so more redundant now. worth maybe trading it in for a new lens such as 35mm f1/4 GM ?
Would the rx10 iv work well for filming horse races?
Great Video
How much storage to HD videos take per hour? What about 4k?
Is there even such a lens for e-mount camera's for a reasonable price?? Been looking for one for ages....
Hello!! Im videographer and i wonder if is this camera a good investment for videos jobs! I shot interviews with more than 1 camera and im a camcorder user! Im considering to buy this sony rx10 iv but iv heard the camera overheat and turns off after long time shooting! What would u say about for those like me that shoot videos! ? Tks
thanks. i own the sony rx10 m4. it is the camera i should have purchased first.
Nice Video ✌👍
Can it record 960fps in full hd?
I've owned a couple of bridge cameras from Canon and Panasonic, the thing I have hated about bridge cameras is trying to get birds in flight with the dinky viewfinder. How does the Sony viewfinder compare to something like a Nikon D500. Cheers.
Sold Canon 7DmkII, Canon 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM, 1.4 extender, and a bunch of other lenses down to the range of 15mm and bought the Sony. Thus I don't have to carry 20+ kg of equipment with me anymore, I get twice the fps, can record 4k, slow motion, have a much faster autofocus, and you won't believe it: despite the sensor being smaller the images are still sharper at 600mm (and equivalent)! I don't regret it for one second, would do it again in a heart beat and I got $350 spare cash after buying the Sony. Best camera I ever bought!
Je Zak Hi Je Zak, same setup but got rid of my 100-400L v1 after 10 years of use. Now after having the RX10M4 for 10 I’m not impressed. Low light photography sucks as it can’t focus on anything, macro or close subjects it has a hard times focusing and due to weather conditions no pictures outside as either too cold (some days at -20C) or cloudy/windy or snowy. Battery life sucks compared to my 7DMK2 with a battery grip that I could easily go up to 1800+ pics.
Still doesn’t replace my L 24-70mm f2,8 and 70-200mm f2,8. Won’t get rid of the rest of my and actually think of retiring this gadget and getting the newer Canon L100-400mm v2.
Almost forgot, weather sealing? None on the RX10M4, no issues with my 7DMK2 + L glass on my Canon in -29C temps, snow, rain or even dipping them in the sea or getting wet while in a zodiac on the ocean.
@@luminaire7085 You're making up stuff to make a point. I hope you had fun.
@@jefo2405 Not making stuff up. RX10M4 is still a all-in-one solution but no replacement for faster glass and bigger sensor. Me too got bored to carry my 20 lbs of gear in a backpack but when it comes to image quality and operational conditions then my DSLR comes first.
Could use the RX10M4 as a Point & Shoot but that's it.
In terms of temps we have hit the -20C and we are still in fall, we had warmer days but then it falls right back.
All the best from up north and keep on shooting (pictures) no matter the comments.
I stand corrected on the term "weather sealing". It has what ever the following video shows: Stuart "James Photography - Sony Rx10iv out in the heavy rain". Thats no more ore less than I would dare subjecting my 7dmkii to. I wont get into the rest, as we would ague that until we're all the stupider for it.
Hello! How does this work for concert photography? Is it easy to keep up with the ever changing stage lighting? How is resolution and noise at the 600mm?
It will do ok - because of the larger 1" sensor it will provide decent results but if concert photography is something you are serious about a larger sensor will provide better results - something like the sony a6400 with 70-300 - then again, unless you have a permit most ILC cameras are not allowed at many venues :(
How good is it as a portrait camera?
It does look a wonderful camera and i was thinking of this style while on holiday. I was smitten by the Panasonic DMC FZ2000EB
20x optical zoom, 1 inch sensor a flip out screen and a built in ND filters. Maybe Farther Christmas can help out? nice review Toby.
I just ordered a fz2500 for those reasons. I use a Nikon D5 and 850 at work, but for my personal use I wanted to have something all in one. Especially as I'm very interested in video.
Hello and sounds a wise choice, Do enjoy and do drop me a line after you master it. cheers from a little jealous Ian
I just got it today! First impression is that the on/off switch is WAY too plastic, a bit annoyed by that. Feels solid, nice dials, zoom is SO smooth, reminds me of the ENG cams I'm used to.
In fact, the way I view this is as a smaller form factor ENG cam. I learned on a NX-5U, and this has a larger sensor, a similar lens and much higher bitrates and resolution. The only thing it lacks is XLR, but you can bypass that with something like www.amazon.ca/Microphone-Adapter-Panasonic-Mirrorless-Camcorders/dp/B075DFXLB3/ref=cm_wl_huc_item.
I also picked up a cheap wired lav, and a takstar shotgun mic.
I checked out the DCI 4k at 24p, it looks amazing.
I thank you for your reply and on the strength of it will be purchasing soon, It is a shame about the on off switch as that will always haunt it. wishing you all the best with your Panasonic setup and thank you again, Ian
Shot my first stills today, they look surprisingly good at iso 3200! I'm quite impressed. If you shoot wide, you'll find image stabilization can get you steady shots at about 1/5 if you have decently steady hands.
The Autofocus is really impressing me so far.
Very Cool!!
Every time I see one of your reviews I want to buy the camera you're reviewing.
You have an special charm to review different products.
Till next time!
I paid $1,600 for mine from B&H and I am more than happy with it. I am headed for an African safari and did NOT want to take a backpack full of lenses.
Does it have digital zoom?
I bought this camera before my trip to Amsterdam & London last October, it did everything I needed & more. From now on it will be my go to travel camera.
I just bought the camera and it works great, I love it.
Enjoy it
I bought this camera few months back..In India....they gave me battery charger and 64 GB card as free..i think that makes it perfect deal...and also needless to say..i bargained and bought at less than $1700
Image quality wise for wildlife, would you recommend the RX10 IV vs the new A6600 with apsc lens 70-350 F4. 5-6.3?
The RX10 is going to get you MUCH closer with a smaller camera. But if you want the best image quality the larger APS-C sensor is going to provide that - you will just need to buy a longer lens or a much bigger lens.
But where is the RX10V ? Still waiting for it ! Update is essential for the camera and the app. It's been released in 2017, come on Sony !!!! Don't forget us. Please.
Nice video as always:)
Thank you Colm!
I AM REALLY CONFUSED BETWEEN 1000 $ FZ 2500 AND THE 1200 $ RX 10 3 AND THE 1600 $ RX10 4 , MANY REVIEWS SHOWS THE FZ 2500 AS A BETTER V-CAMERA WISH I LIKE TO HAVE AS AN OPTION BUT I AM MORE INTO QUALITY PICTURE , YOUR OPINION WILL HELP A LOT
+Photorec TV Can you explain the a/f setting you used? I bought this camera two weeks ago and I am struggling with getting sharp birds in focus.
I left it on default settings and used AF-C with wide area AF.
Irony is the majority of hobyist's who spend a fortune on semi pro level camera kit would do just as well with this camera. Doesn't have the 'pose' factor though.
Exactly.
Who wants to settle for "doing just as well"? I own both the RX10 IV and the old RX1 that came out in 2012. There isn't even a question or a second of hesitation when asked which camera I'd keep if I could only have one: the RX1. However, I might trade-in both cameras for a Sony A7riii with a GM zoom lens. A photographer needs to keep improving the match between their process and the tools by which the process is carried out. The two need to be integrated and work together, like lens and sensor. But if you don't have a process then you won't care too much about what camera you use, and the RX10 would certainly "do just as well" as a professional camera.
Not having a “pose” factor is often a great advantage especially street photography
@@Nonduality Interested to know why you think the RX1 (you mean RX10 Mk 1?) is better than the Mk IV?
@@Nonduality Im doing the very same thing . RX1 was a great camera as are any of the A7r's
By the way, 1" vs 0.5" is 4 times the size, not "twice as large" ! We're talking "area" not length !
couldnt resist. wanted to write the same xD
Perfect VIDEO ! Now it is worth it buy or maybe is it better ?
Still a great camera!
I have this camera and it's amazing, my only criticism it's that it takes away most of the fun of taking pictures...as nailing down a picture is such an easy task with this, you don't develop any skills... almost always your pictures are sharp and perfectly in focus.
why, you don't like digital technology? or maybe you want go back to film?
easy taking picture is not a problem, the problem is your picture content
This is the best bridge camera to date.
I agree!
Ya know this is a toss up. I have a big safari coming up. Im selling my d810 and was going to upgrade to a d850 but I’m not excited for the weight. I also have a 200-500 which is a lug. I do print my work… not sure if if I should just cash in my chips and the Sony. Can I print 24x36 and be fine?
Yes,compose correctly,ISO @ 1600 or below. You can still crop a little. I had Nikon’s D500,D850 and Z7 with 3 different lenses. The weight and bother vs one light package that if you want can zoom out to 2400mm!! (Not to print out to 24x36 though)
Sorry for the delay but if you are coming from the D810 with big lenses AND you print... I don[t think you will love the results you get from the Sony. Early morning or late evening safari drives will really challenge that 1" sensor and you are going to get more noise than you want.
@@photorectoby I agree. I actually moved up to a d850! Been a hell of a camera.
The Sony's 1" sensor is essentially four times the size of the standard bridge type 1/2.3" sensor found in the Nikon P1000. I would take the Sony over the Nikon every time, that huge P1000 zoom is a one trick pony in my opinion. The Sony's 24 to 600 equivalent is more than enough for every type of photography.
Agreed and I was being a little funny and should have been a little more scientific when I briefly compared the sensor sizes :)
@@photorectoby Excellent photos by the way Toby, proof that a great photographer can take amazing images with any camera 😉
dunny my nephew just got married and I brought the RX as a guest, I shot about 200 images and made some prints, and a photobook, my nephew and my niece like the images better than the ones they got from the photographer they hired for the event
@@longrider9551 Interesting you say that, last year I was a guest at my nephews wedding, he arranged for a professional team of photographer's to shoot the event ( a father and son duo ). I took my Yashica Lynx 5000E and my Panasonic TZ100 1" sensor camera to grab candid shots. On the day of the event only one of the photogs turned up ( all be it with some nice gear to be fair, a Nikon D4s and Fuji XT2 ). To cut a long story short, my nephew wasn't happy at all with the few images captured by the " pro "and is still in dispute and awaiting delivery of the rest of the images which almost a year to the day later he still doesn't have! I put together an album of about 70 of my best images captured using 3 rolls of Ilford XP2 and digital images from the TZ100. He and his wife were thrilled by the photos. 1" sensor cameras are superb these days, I carry my Canon G9X everywhere with me ☺
I am glad you were able to get some good shots - Sorry the hired photographer did not :(
Diplomatic review , well done. It is not for the serious amateur . I love Sony and have many but very disappointed especially the noise and lack of focusing on birds in flight above 300mm.
BIF above 300mm is really easy. Don't know what your settings are, but even with trees in the background, I was able to capture fast flying black-headed guls @ 600mm and get a keeper ratio of >80%
John Glavey quite some professional wildlife photographers use it, mainly because of it its weight. If you track wildlife for many km’s, weight is one of the most important factors.
which one better between Nikon P900 or Canon sx 70 hs, please give me suggestion
RX10IV.
Sx70hs can shoot raw and 4k video,p900 only jpeg ,Fhd only.
5:26 Yes it limits it for Vlogging, but for proper filmmakers and photographers it is far better than the daft, burdonsome, obtrusive and slow flip out screen.
Sold Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark 2 with the 12 200 lens and bought this one, used, for 1200 Euro. Never ever wanting to change back to the Olympus. Low light is somewhat better on Olympus, yet not that much. Sharpness is so much better. Fast focusing, way better than the already speedy Olympus. Sharpness at 220mm (600) way better than the softness of the Oly lens. FPS.. That's insane and irritating: you end up with 40 plus images in focus. Way too much pictures on your card 😜. It's truly a one size fits many camera..
Well, as an owner of that camera, I have to admit that as soon as the light dims, the performance of the camera diminishes immensely. You simply cannot compare to even APS-C sensor camera. The sharpness and noise, especially.
I'd totally go for the 80D and the Tamron, even if I don't like superzooms I saw your review of that and that's a very capable lens despite its wild range
If you're shooting video the rx10 wins hands down
You are forgetting the fact that for that price you're getting a super sharp 24-600mm Zeiss lens with RX10 IV! Not to mention more capable and faster AF and 4K video!
You're ignoring that both RX10 and RX100 come with super sharp Zeiss lens and excellent 1" sensor with great dynamic range.
The DR different is around 2 stops : www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Sony-Cybershot-DSC-RX10-III-versus-Canon-EOS-80D___1084_1076 (Even though it's for RX10 III. So, with RX10 IV the difference should more smaller.) I agree that low ISO performance is not as good as the APS-C. But, then again, the aforementioned Tarmron is 1 full-stop slower on the wide end and 1.3 stop slower on the tele end. Canon has no built-in image stabilization and only relies on the on-lens stabilization. On the other hand RX10 IV has a very effective in body image stabilization (4.5 stops) partly due to a smaller sensor size. Also, Zeiss lens on RX10 IV is consistently sharp across the range starting right from the maximum aperture whereas Tamron is not. Not to mention more capable and rapid AF on the RX10 IV. So, no: it's not really grossly overpriced.
If you are anything into wildlife - let's put it like this: I owned the 7dmkII with Canon's awesome 100-400 mkii zoom. That combo kicks the 80D's butt... and the Sony kicks the 7dmkII's butt. Weirdly enough it's not even a challenge - I say that having taken comparison photographs with both under the same conditions. The Sony makes sharper images for half the price of the above! I don't regret selling all my gear for the Sony. No more lense changing and carrying around of tens of kgs of gear. Also, the Sony actually also just about fits into large jacket pockets. No way the Canon will do so.
Can I use this for portraits and wedding photography?
It isn't going to do great in lower light. I would much rather an APS-C or full frame camera for portraits and weddings.
Surely the Sony RX10 Mk IV is far too big to be a vlogging camera anyway, so the type of screen isn't an issue?
The Rx10iv does not a flexible LCD for vlogging, and too heavy for it.
No, get an a 7iii or iv and a high quality telephoto lens. You have much more versatility with a body only camera and a multitude of lenses. This camera is the type that ends up on craigslist for $600. $1700 is too close to an a7 body only price.
I rented one of these and was super disappointed to discover that the focal length was actually only 220mm full frame equivalent :( my moon shots looked so much better on the Sigma 100-400. This camera was a lot of fun to use and its quality was really impressive but I see now why many consider it to be a "bridge" camera
I have a Sony rx10 III, would you recommend upgrading to the RX10 IV? Question number 2, I have a Nikon SB800 speed light and it does not seem to work with the RX10 III. Any suggestions for adaptors or adjustments? By the way, good video and I really like my RX10 III.
Hi Fred- I don't think the IV offers enough for me to recommend an upgrade for you - wait for the next version. There really is no way to get one manufacturers flash working on a different camera - Sorry Fred :(
@@photorectoby thank you.
Anyone knows how to get large live-view screen when using Android?
Also, using Android's WiFi in Manual (M), how do you adjust the Aperture?
Why still delayed when shooting with ATG, Interfit, Jinbei, Phottix, Profoto & Rollei TTL/M strobes?
DX10 or A6300? Astronomy, children, nature...
The 1-inch sensor is 4 times bigger than half an inch sensor.
I've come to realize that the improper use of the description "P&S" for this camera is a marketing decision, as it is an inaccurate categorization. There are pro photographers that use this as their daily driver. Yes, the cost is worth it for this "Bridge" camera.
Intéressant
One of the main reasons I did not buy this camera is battery life, but it is even a bigger problem than was mentioned in this video. The zoom lens is an electronic zoom that zooms out to wide angle every time you turn the power off. The reason this makes the battery problem worst is not because of the power the zoom uses. The problem is if you are keeping the camera off to save power, you not only have to wait for the normal camera boot up time when you turn the power on, but you also have to set your zoom to where you want it every time you turn the power on (unless you want to use the zoom at the widest angle). Therefore you have to wait longer to shoot after power up than most cameras. If you shoot a lot of video the electronic zoom is an excellent feature, because you can get a smoother, less jerky zoom, and you are much less likely to shake the camera when zooming. Sony put bigger batteries in their 3 latest full frame cameras, so I do not understand why they did not put the same battery in this camera. With all the engineering they put into this camera, changing the battery would have been relatively simple, and add little cost. Some might argue that this is a point and shoot camera, so they wanted to keep the size small, but this camera is not that small and light, and adding the larger battery would not have made that much difference in the size. In fact I heard other reviewers complain that the grip size was too small, so the larger battery would make the grip size larger. The larger battery would also allow you to use the same battery in this camera and Sony full frame cameras if you own both cameras.
No problem for me as third party batteries and dual chargers are dirt cheap and perform as well as the supplied battery.
@@evannorth5397 Can you list the batteries and charger you have please? I have had poor luck with off brand batteries (Canon & Panasonic cameras). A recommendation from you for ones that really work and a good AC charger would help. I mostly shoot video with the Sony, so I need three batteries...I record presentations that are often an hour with no break (except quick battery swap). Thanks.
@@rizzlerazzleuno4733 I use the neewer brand batteries for my rx10 iv. They came supplied with a dual charger.
@@evannorth5397 Thank you.
0:54 omg UFO (omegalul)
well spotted!
Toby winner?
for the same amount money spent on sony rx10 iv, I can get sony a6400+the new Sony 70-350 telephoto lens
Although you have a much larger sensor but your lenses reach from 105/4.5 to 525/6.3.
Good luck getting the A6400 to take images @ 24mm/2.4 & zoom up to 600/4.0.
Good luck getting flash sync to 2,000 without killing your flash with A6400 to A7r IV.
1인치 가격이 ㅎㄷㄷ
The main drawback of this camera is the build quality. Doesn't feel premium. At this price it should be titanium.
He reminds me a lot of Johnny Herbert.
I googled him - sure.
Maybe it's just my inexperience. But I upgraded my Nikon D700 for the Sony RX10 IV. I was spoiled by the low light and dynamic range of the Nikon. Try as I may, I just could NOT get as good photos with this. I pushed it for 4 months and finally gave up. Went to the Nikon D850. Best purchase yet.
the HDR is crap on this camera. the effect is barely noticeable . i have a sony 300. it has the big zoom with same glass but the HDR is as dramatic as anyone could wish for. and at a tenth of the price
Toby did I wn?
Thanks ✳️👍✳️👍✳️👍
Thanks ✳️👍✳️👍✳️👍 ;)
Point and Shoot? What a ridiculous and false thing to say about this camera. How are numerous manual settings and manual focus "point and shoot"? Many digital SLR's including the Sony A9, have a fully automatic mode- is it a point and shoot?
Quite; any camera can be used that way. And it is also a mirrorless dslr, just without the exchangeable lens function. Nine programmable buttons.
no, a dslr with a superzoom is cheaper and better though more bother you will not be disappointed, if you were the rx10 would devastate you, its not as small but it is a 600 not an rx10 200, which is what it is a 200 with high pixel density, a 2.7 multiplier that affects the bokeh if not the light gathering. Its like calling a mcdonalds burger a steak knowing only peasants will swallow it, literally. To kill the hype advertise a super burger the dslr 600 as a 1620mm.
It depends on what your needs are and if you want the added bulk. Ultimately I agree for anyone serious about photography a DSLR or Mirrorless is going to give them more room to grow as a photographer but not everyone has that desire - some just want a camera that gives them awesome zoom, solid quality in a travel-friendly package.
I have this camera and two ff cameras with the top lenses from 15mm to 400mm. I shoot weddings and portraits almost every day. I can tell you if you know what you doing this camera able to take perfect photos. Much better than any apsc dslr from 5 years ago. Of course you can't compete with any fast prime lens bokeh with this superzoom, but don't forget you can take photos with this camera from 24-600mm any time. The DR is not bad at all if you not completly stupid for the photography. And I write this comment in the park with my daughter and this camera in my backpack and if I see anything what worth to photograph I can do.
Nicely Said!
@@photorectoby and I'm 100% sure he never tried any of this cameras. :) possibly his the hard core camera guy with his canon/nikon apsc camera with kit lens+ 50mm f1.8(nothing wrong with this setup anyway) combo who protect the dslr-s until his last breath.
Point and Shoots have fixed apertures, hence you point and shoot, this camera has full manual control, fixed lens camera yes point and shoot NO
1:10 4x bigger
NO! ITS NOT WORTH IT.
This is not a "point and shoot" camera.
No? Why not - it is not an ILC (interchangeable lens camera) so it fits the description of a superzoom P&S though I do agree it doesn't tell the full story.
@@photorectoby 1. Shooting in RAW not a standard P&S option. 2. Multiple manual settings on par with DSLR which require some amount of thought and planning. It's a Bridge camera.