Thanks to this video, the geography geek in me learned about Southwark, Northern Liberties, and Spring Garden, all absorbed into Philadelphia in 1854, but early in our nation’s history were at different points among the ten most populous cities in America. Love these videos!
-1949-50 is the most interesting part due to how all those Rust Belt cities just started nosediving. -Those newer top 10's don't garner the same respect as those from 1812-1945 (critical war years & innovation era). - No one (esp. in media) talks about how San Jose became the 2nd city in U.S. history to fall from the 1,000,000+ club. - Milwaukee was a "blink and you'll miss it" - Minneapolis & St. Louis (the 1st time) shouldn't had been on this list since they weren't US cities until 1803.
@@brinleynicholson4588not only that, but a rise in domestic problems in the 1960’s also led to the decline.
Před 4 měsíci
Respect? From who? Democrats? Most of us conservatives don’t respect big cities at all! They are cesspools of crime and communist policies, who dictate the rest of society’s lives. No respect here.
People don’t think my city , San Antonio is as big as it is but it spreads out forever and our county is large that has a lot of room for further growth . The. “ Hill Country -plex” .. ( San Antonio -Austin ) forecasted to be one of the biggest soon.
Philly & 2 of its suburbs were in the top 10. Notice newcomer San Jose lost over 60K in 5 years. Since SJ and Austin pretty much has the same economy, Austin should be out of the top 10 in less than 20 years as well.
@@davidwalton3604for mere city population yes. But that doesn’t tell the whole picture. Metro area wise Miami is the largest in Florida and top 15 in the Us
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-WPB is just one big mass of urban sprawl. It stops at the North Palm Beach County line. It all used to be 305 area code when I was a pup. it's a bunch of small cities, more on the way. As a metro area, by now, over 7mil. people easy.
The population of cities is very misleading. The Metropolitan area around those cites is more important as to how large the area is. For instance San Antonio has 1.4 million and the metro area is 2.6 million. Dallas is1.3 mil and the metro area is 7.9 million, over 3 times as large.
While you are correct that the metro population does give a better idea of the actual number of people within the area of a city, I also do think it is important to differentiate between a city's metro population and a city's proper population for the context of this video; since a metro can technically consist of multiple major cities. For example, the "Dallas" metro, or DFW metro to be more accurate, isn't just consisting of Dallas' population but also Fort Worth's which is a large city in it's own right (about at 950,000 residents I believe) and not mention Arlington's population as well. I think the purpose of this video was just to showcase the growth of individual cities respectively and not necessarily the "two for one" city situations that do occur in some other metro areas. I would love to see a video like this but with the metro population though.
yes for sure, you get the commuters from counties and near by states..like NYC and DC metro have multiple states, same thing woth los angeles county having far more people...yeah the "people inside the city at any given time rate"!!!
I think it is “directionally correct” in the sense that every city with a large population also has a large metropolitan area. For instance, Chicago has 2.7M people and a metro area population of 8.9M
@@davidwalton3604 Thank you, Mr Walton. I'd not seen your comment when I made mine just a few moments ago. Perhaps the channel provider has a different sense of the meaning of "population" that what would generally be considered to be legitimate.
I’m originally from China. I was born in a Chinese city that had 21 million permanent residents and 10 extra million of non-permanent residents, a total of 31 million. The traffic was insane.
The video's statistics are a bit misleading. The city of Los Angeles has about 4 million people, but greater Los Angeles is about 16 million. Greater New York is 23 million.
@@duckmercy11 You've never been to Los Angeles have you.... You think Los Angeles is 4 million people because the city of Los Angeles is 4 million? Do you know how crazy gerrymandered it is with strange tendrils of "Los Angeles" sticking out all over the place. I bet you think Disneyland is Los Angeles too? How about Beverly Hills and Santa Monica? Venice Beach is right next to Santa Monica, but it's Los Angeles. Culver City is not Los Angeles but it borders Venice. Please drive through and tell me you can tell the difference, where one starts and the other begins. No one else can including me, and I live here.
When I visit Civil War battle fields, it strikes me that for some of the battles, the number of combatants would crack the top ten in population if the gathered forces were considered a city.
By far the bloodiest war in US history and the population was only around 30 million back then. The fact that 1 in 30 people died during the war is crazy to me. That doesn't even account for the much larger amount of people wounded.
I believe Norfolk va should be in this list at the beginning in 1776. In 1753, Lt. Governor Robert Dinwiddie presented the growing city of 4,000 with a 41-inch (1,000 mm) long, 104 ounce silver mace.
Why isn't Atlanta, Orlando and Miami on this list? Have you ever try to drive thru the cities? This list must be the city limits and not the metro area.
Inasmuch as the official population of the Minnesota territory was 6607 in 1850 I'm fairly confident that the video's claim that the population of Minneapolis was 4400+ in 1776 is erroneous. Do you have any idea, Mr Gozhda, how you arrived at that number for Mpls?
*It's hard to know that New York was once not #1, but Phidephia seems like it was going to make a comeback but lost gas. Los Angeles came out of nowhere to take 2nd place though.*
Spring Garden, Northern Liberties, and Southwark were all incorporated into Philadelphia in 1853, when the city and the county of Philadelphia merged into a single unit.
Cahokia, a Native American city near modern day St. Louis, should be in first until around 1830-40. It’s an interesting city with cool history for any nerds like me who want to learn about it.
They don't list Cahokia because that's part of history they'd rather we don't know about. They only want us to know the HIS---STORY they present to us.
Thats crazy Milwaukee was in the top 10 largest cities list from 1961-1964 😲. I forgot tho that Milwaukee is a u.s. major city and they are on the that list.
I had to scroll too far down to find this comment, smh. When I saw MPLS on the list, I was like whaaa?!! Minnesota didnt exist at that time, hell the louisiana purchase, within which most of MInnesota's land is, didnt happen until the early 1800s
Size of the city doesn't mean much when people live in a neighboring suburb then travel there for work. That's why the Census now uses metropolitan areas since suburbs began to boom during the 50's during the baby boom era.
It does mean that population density is much lower, and therefore public utilities much more spread out. Every extra inch, every extra mile, is further from the path of sustainability.
Atlanta surpassed Miami two years ago to become number 8. It is projected to surpass Philly next year to become number 7. This video doesn't even show Atlanta or Miami.
@@duckmercy11 I just don't see the point of the video. The city limits of Juneau Alaska covers over 2,700 square miles which is bigger than some countries yet it only has 31,000 people. If city limits were relevant Juneau should be one of the most populated cities in America. But it's not. If people are interested in this video fine but it doesn't really mean much IMO. I mean if the NFL is looking for a new place to start a football team it probably wont be Juneau Alaska or a lot of the cities in this video for that matter. They will use MSA population because that is meaningful data.
Would be interesting to see Chicago population vs places like Naperville and Schaumburg and Evanston. Looking at 2022 census data, Chicago had 2.7M people with a metro area population of 8.9M. Kinda crazy.
I don't think that's true. According to the video: 1. Boston, Salem, and Marblehead in the late 1780s 2. Philadelphia, Northern Liberties, and Southwark from the 1790s to the 1830s 3. New York, Brooklyn, and Albany (and later Buffalo) from the 1830s to the 1860s But yeah, before Texas it hadn't happened for a really long time.
@@MoneyC225 Pittsburgh only made the list around 1900, long after Philadelphia had annexed Northern Liberties and Southwark. So since the 1830s, three Pennsylvania cities have never been in the top 10 simultaneously, and before the 1830s, Pittsburgh was not a part of the three. I guess Pittsburgh would be included if we were talking about states that had more than 3 cities in the top 10 AT SOME POINT, but that's not how I interpreted OP's comment. Also, my first comment did leave out another Pennsylvania city that was simultaneously in the top 10 with two others: Spring Garden in the 1840s, yet another Philadelphia annex during the Act of Consolidation of 1854.
How was Cleveland #8 in 1776 when Cleveland wasn’t founded until 1796?! Marietta was the first city in Ohio and it wasn’t founded until 1788. Definitely makes the rest of your data a little suspect. 🤦🏻♂️
They were always counted and they went back to update the numbers to what actually should’ve been if they were counted as full people so that has absolutely nothing to do with modern day numbers or any of the numbers
Los Angeles County is 3,000 sq miles and has roughly 17 million people in it at any given time so no wonder its traffic beats out metro NYC! LA city which in size is bigger than NYC (as is Chicago) should be doing more to keep people instead of garbage policies, the right mayor comes along and booms vertical housing and cleans that town up would keep LA right there but i think the county will suffer the same fate as the city. Basically what NYC is facing now as they did in the early 90's. I wonder if NYC will keep losing residents as well. I'll keep this vid in my saved favorites so 20 years from now maybe you can post updated figures!
@@davidwalton3604 By 1850, Louisville had become the tenth largest city in the nation, with more than 43,000 people. It was a major port, with a thriving boatyard industry. It had a new university, was building a Catholic cathedral, and was organizing the Louisville and Nashville Railroad. Its streets had been lighted by gas for more than a decade; businesses and wealthy homes had interior gaslights. Prestige suburbs were developing in the rural area south of Broadway. But the underground sewer system had reached a length of only one and one-half miles.
@@davidwalton3604 I think there’s debate of that census. Because I’ve seen Louisville listed as a top 10 in that era. They the 1840s the civil war and then drops off in the early 1900 with the close of the steamboat era.
You get the impression that NY was trying to fend off a challenge by Chicago, so it decided to swallow up Brooklyn.
NYC is a cheater.
Haha facts 😂
NY and Brooklyn are 4000 feet apart. Not even a mile!
New York has been the most populous city since 1785!!!!😱
@@andrekrapcha938 And it will be for a loooong time
Thanks to this video, the geography geek in me learned about Southwark, Northern Liberties, and Spring Garden, all absorbed into Philadelphia in 1854, but early in our nation’s history were at different points among the ten most populous cities in America. Love these videos!
Largest City in USA:
Philladelphia (1776 - 1785)
New York (1785 - 2023)
they both were the nations capital also before washington dc
Current*
Los Angeles doubled in size from 500k to 1 million from 1918 to 1926. Just 8 years added 500K people! That's insane.
Water the growth of the Aqueduct
Oil?
@@unionnet27 a little bit later
After WWI, there were lot of jobs and a great climate
1955 - central air conditioning has just entered the chat.
1949 - Freeway construction entered the chat.
Yes it's noticeable.
Top 5 invention of all time
Also the rapid growth of Detroit that peaked in 1950 at 1.8 million people. Then dropping to 900k residents in 2001. Devastating.
It’s not hard to figure out why
To this day it is incredible viewing Detroit on Google Earth. Entire neighbourhoods with nothing but foundations and fallen piles of wood left.
This is what happens when you have democrats i total control for sixty plus years.
@@sammyweed4771Oakland, Memphis, and the Bronx didn't experience the same population loss. What's your excuse?
@@kaiseramadeus233 the Riots of 68 or you to young or stupid…. Witch one ??
-1949-50 is the most interesting part due to how all those Rust Belt cities just started nosediving.
-Those newer top 10's don't garner the same respect as those from 1812-1945 (critical war years & innovation era).
- No one (esp. in media) talks about how San Jose became the 2nd city in U.S. history to fall from the 1,000,000+ club.
- Milwaukee was a "blink and you'll miss it"
- Minneapolis & St. Louis (the 1st time) shouldn't had been on this list since they weren't US cities until 1803.
St. Louis completely started bleeding right at 1950 crazy to see
You can also see when the auto manufactures left Detroit. It's numbers started dropping like a rock.
@@brinleynicholson4588not only that, but a rise in domestic problems in the 1960’s also led to the decline.
Respect? From who? Democrats? Most of us conservatives don’t respect big cities at all! They are cesspools of crime and communist policies, who dictate the rest of society’s lives. No respect here.
Besides New York, Philadelphia is the only city that stayed on the list the entire time.
People don’t think my city , San Antonio is as big as it is but it spreads out forever and our county is large that has a lot of room for further growth . The. “ Hill Country -plex” .. ( San Antonio -Austin ) forecasted to be one of the biggest soon.
Yeah, Ive worked in San Antonio and it doesn’t seem big because the skyline is small, but the suburbs are wide and dense.
I only knew about them big women down in San Antonio, not that there were so many of them!
I was just about to say the same thing. We are always overlooked. Dallas, Austin and Houston.
@@duchess_of_petty9323 I'm in Fort Worth, no one even knows we exist, they think we are Dallas, also F Dallas.
All those rust belt cities just crashed and burned.
Interesting to see the rise of the Southwest cities from the 70s on
Once central air conditioning became a thing in the 1960s it was only a matter of time before sun belt cities to start their boom!
Air conditioning !!!!
The french miracle (New Rochelle (NYC) => New Orleans => Saint-Louis => Detroit => Chicago).
NYC 1970's population decline was white flight. Then the NYC 1980's and later population increase was Asians and Hispanics moving in.
Can you blame them? The modern laws completely shit on white people.
Phoenix comes out of nowhere and just jumps up half the list lol.
I live in Austin and didn’t even realize it cracked the top 10.
Recently did
It's crazy how big NY is
Wow Texas has 4 cities in the top 10
Philly & 2 of its suburbs were in the top 10. Notice newcomer San Jose lost over 60K in 5 years. Since SJ and Austin pretty much has the same economy, Austin should be out of the top 10 in less than 20 years as well.
Which makes you wonder why Texas isn’t a blue state.
L.A. entered the Top 10 list only after 1918...
The southwest was remarkably empty before WWII.
Shocking to me that there are no Florida cities in this list
To much suburban sprawl, all the big Florida cities are landlocked from growing expect Jacksonville and maybe Orlando
@@brewcrew2221 Miami will if it keeps taking land to grow
@@davidwalton3604for mere city population yes. But that doesn’t tell the whole picture.
Metro area wise Miami is the largest in Florida and top 15 in the Us
@@pika62221 way too expensive
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-WPB is just one big mass of urban sprawl. It stops at the North Palm Beach County line. It all used to be 305 area code when I was a pup. it's a bunch of small cities, more on the way. As a metro area, by now, over 7mil. people easy.
The population of cities is very misleading. The Metropolitan area around those cites is more important as to how large the area is. For instance San Antonio has 1.4 million and the metro area is 2.6 million. Dallas is1.3 mil and the metro area is 7.9 million, over 3 times as large.
While you are correct that the metro population does give a better idea of the actual number of people within the area of a city, I also do think it is important to differentiate between a city's metro population and a city's proper population for the context of this video; since a metro can technically consist of multiple major cities. For example, the "Dallas" metro, or DFW metro to be more accurate, isn't just consisting of Dallas' population but also Fort Worth's which is a large city in it's own right (about at 950,000 residents I believe) and not mention Arlington's population as well. I think the purpose of this video was just to showcase the growth of individual cities respectively and not necessarily the "two for one" city situations that do occur in some other metro areas. I would love to see a video like this but with the metro population though.
yes for sure, you get the commuters from counties and near by states..like NYC and DC metro have multiple states, same thing woth los angeles county having far more people...yeah the "people inside the city at any given time rate"!!!
I think it is “directionally correct” in the sense that every city with a large population also has a large metropolitan area. For instance, Chicago has 2.7M people and a metro area population of 8.9M
No, they’re not misleading whatsoever
@@Lemon_Man_Chan no he’s completely wrong because metro aren’t cities. They’re multiple cities and towns.
This chart has Cleveland on it in 1776, but the city of Cleveland wasn't even founded until 1796.
And St Louis wasn’t part of the us until the Louisiana purchase
@@davidwalton3604 Thank you, Mr Walton. I'd not seen your comment when I made mine just a few moments ago. Perhaps the channel provider has a different sense of the meaning of "population" that what would generally be considered to be legitimate.
I’m originally from China. I was born in a Chinese city that had 21 million permanent residents and 10 extra million of non-permanent residents, a total of 31 million.
The traffic was insane.
The video's statistics are a bit misleading. The city of Los Angeles has about 4 million people, but greater Los Angeles is about 16 million. Greater New York is 23 million.
Pretty soon America will have more Chinamen than China.
@@mygoatisdead It's about traditional cities, not sprawling suburbs. 30 miles outside NYC isn't NYC.
@@duckmercy11 You've never been to Los Angeles have you.... You think Los Angeles is 4 million people because the city of Los Angeles is 4 million? Do you know how crazy gerrymandered it is with strange tendrils of "Los Angeles" sticking out all over the place. I bet you think Disneyland is Los Angeles too? How about Beverly Hills and Santa Monica? Venice Beach is right next to Santa Monica, but it's Los Angeles. Culver City is not Los Angeles but it borders Venice. Please drive through and tell me you can tell the difference, where one starts and the other begins. No one else can including me, and I live here.
The background music to this is the most 'Murica I've ever heard, well done
When I visit Civil War battle fields, it strikes me that for some of the battles, the number of combatants would crack the top ten in population if the gathered forces were considered a city.
By far the bloodiest war in US history and the population was only around 30 million back then.
The fact that 1 in 30 people died during the war is crazy to me. That doesn't even account for the much larger amount of people wounded.
I believe Norfolk va should be in this list at the beginning in 1776.
In 1753, Lt. Governor Robert Dinwiddie presented the growing city of 4,000 with a 41-inch (1,000 mm) long, 104 ounce silver mace.
Super cool 👏
Brother, can you make a video about the most popular youtube chennels in turkey?
St. Louis held on for a while till 1950 when everyone moved to the county
Poor Detroit
Its comin back slowly but surely. VERY slowly, but surely
Why isn't Atlanta, Orlando and Miami on this list? Have you ever try to drive thru the cities? This list must be the city limits and not the metro area.
They probably didn't consider Miami part of the US.
Miami and Atlanta have mid size inner city limit populations but the metro population is what makes those cities big.
They did city limits!!
I dig the music
Inasmuch as the official population of the Minnesota territory was 6607 in 1850 I'm fairly confident that the video's claim that the population of Minneapolis was 4400+ in 1776 is erroneous. Do you have any idea, Mr Gozhda, how you arrived at that number for Mpls?
2:57 ah, yes when Brooklyn became NYC
*It's hard to know that New York was once not #1, but Phidephia seems like it was going to make a comeback but lost gas. Los Angeles came out of nowhere to take 2nd place though.*
In the beginning I saw New Liberties. What did it's name change to?
It changed to Northern Liberties.
Someone posted that Northern Liberties was annexed by Philadelphia.
@@Griffinmc Ok, thanks!
Spring Garden, Northern Liberties, and Southwark were all incorporated into Philadelphia in 1853, when the city and the county of Philadelphia merged into a single unit.
I didn't figure out that they were color coded by state until the 1960's.
I Love Chicago, IL. Spring, Summers & Fall. and Houston, TX Fall, Winters & Spring. 6 Months in Each. (smile)
Chicago is a democrat party hell hole.
Boston was holding its own until it reached 700k, then it just never grew from there. Then the California and Texas cities all just blew by it
Cahokia, a Native American city near modern day St. Louis, should be in first until around 1830-40. It’s an interesting city with cool history for any nerds like me who want to learn about it.
Before then even, it was established before the US even existed.
They don't list Cahokia because that's part of history they'd rather we don't know about. They only want us to know the HIS---STORY they present to us.
About Houston?
Baltimore was the 2nd largest city for 40 years.
May I ask where these data were obtained from
@gozhdaa
The US census
Thats crazy Milwaukee was in the top 10 largest cities list from 1961-1964 😲. I forgot tho that Milwaukee is a u.s. major city and they are on the that list.
Austin was MUCH BETTER when there were only about 500-600k people back in the mid to late 90's. F Austin now
Nice to see Milwaukee in the top 10 in the late 60s
Suburb of Chicago it was considered
Should have one for Canada
Did not know houston was that big
So, at one time a long time ago, New York City, was consider an upgrade! YOU CALL THESE PLACES CITIES.
This is so cool to see the progression as immigrants come to the US and see new cities pop up as US expands west, super cool!
no its not.
Where’s Atlanta?
Atlanta metro population is big but the actual city of Atlanta is mid sized
Funny how as famous certain cities are in pop culture (Las Vegas, Miami, Atlanta, New Orleans, D.C., Seattle) none of them are on the list
You need to do MSAs not city limit populations or you get silly results like San Antonio being larger than Dallas...
Not any time recently. San Antonio is currently only the 24th largest metro area. Dallas is 4th, ahead of houston.
2:40 Chicago Population Booming in the 1880s
5:00 Los Angeles grows
The lines started moving the wrong way for bit in 2020...
Minneapolis on the list in 1780? It didn't exist at that time.
I had to scroll too far down to find this comment, smh. When I saw MPLS on the list, I was like whaaa?!! Minnesota didnt exist at that time, hell the louisiana purchase, within which most of MInnesota's land is, didnt happen until the early 1800s
NY
1975 3 californian cities in top 10. San Francisco, San Diego, and Los Angeles!
Size of the city doesn't mean much when people live in a neighboring suburb then travel there for work. That's why the Census now uses metropolitan areas since suburbs began to boom during the 50's during the baby boom era.
It does mean that population density is much lower, and therefore public utilities much more spread out. Every extra inch, every extra mile, is further from the path of sustainability.
Right if you use metro areas, dallas-fort worth is at number 4 ahead of houston and behind only chicago, LA, and new york
Atlanta surpassed Miami two years ago to become number 8. It is projected to surpass Philly next year to become number 7.
This video doesn't even show Atlanta or Miami.
@@frankmarsh1159 It's about traditional cities, not sprawling suburbs.
@@duckmercy11 I just don't see the point of the video. The city limits of Juneau Alaska covers over 2,700 square miles which is bigger than some countries yet it only has 31,000 people. If city limits were relevant Juneau should be one of the most populated cities in America. But it's not. If people are interested in this video fine but it doesn't really mean much IMO. I mean if the NFL is looking for a new place to start a football team it probably wont be Juneau Alaska or a lot of the cities in this video for that matter. They will use MSA population because that is meaningful data.
Chicago land still makes Chicago the 2nd biggest metro area in the country
Noticable drop in all populations in 2020
It’s amazing how many people Chicago has lost.
Not really. Chicago is a shithole run by crooked politicians who have been driving that city into the ground for a century.
They moved to the burbs'.
Would be interesting to see Chicago population vs places like Naperville and Schaumburg and Evanston.
Looking at 2022 census data, Chicago had 2.7M people with a metro area population of 8.9M. Kinda crazy.
LA took a jump back in 2020..jeez i wonder why?
Texas is the first state to ever have more than 3 cities in the top 10.
I don't think that's true. According to the video:
1. Boston, Salem, and Marblehead in the late 1780s
2. Philadelphia, Northern Liberties, and Southwark from the 1790s to the 1830s
3. New York, Brooklyn, and Albany (and later Buffalo) from the 1830s to the 1860s
But yeah, before Texas it hadn't happened for a really long time.
That because is an older state, how ever California now surpassed Texas.
@@taintedlogicng6985 Don't forget about Pittsburgh w/ the other Pennsylvania cities.
@@MoneyC225 Pittsburgh only made the list around 1900, long after Philadelphia had annexed Northern Liberties and Southwark. So since the 1830s, three Pennsylvania cities have never been in the top 10 simultaneously, and before the 1830s, Pittsburgh was not a part of the three.
I guess Pittsburgh would be included if we were talking about states that had more than 3 cities in the top 10 AT SOME POINT, but that's not how I interpreted OP's comment.
Also, my first comment did leave out another Pennsylvania city that was simultaneously in the top 10 with two others: Spring Garden in the 1840s, yet another Philadelphia annex during the Act of Consolidation of 1854.
PA had four in the early parts of this actually.
LA cheated by expanding their county so much (they're absolutely gargantuan); NY did as well to a lesser degree. Philly kept it real.
City proper
Where is Southwark?
It's now a neighborhood in Philadelphia, as is Northern Liberties.
Where is californea
California is a state not a city
What happened in 2018?
I peeped that as well. More than likely, those sudden losses were tied to illegal immigration/deportations.
It was 2019-2020. Hmmm? What happened then?
@@fiarandompenaltygeneratorm5044 pandemic only happened in 2020 onwards lol
@@doggo2995 Exactly. Do you really not understand this simple graph?
In 1804, the Louisiana Purchase included what is now Mandan, ND. This was the fifth largest city in the nation.
HOUSTON?
Houston is the most populous city in tx which is the 2nd most populous state in the country so yeah, houston.
Northern liberties is Philly.
So is spring garden
Really show you how much Detroit fell off.
Chicago has the best flag.
Miami? Is not part of the US?
Miami has like 500k💀
@@kylefarley5851not even. A lil less
It doesn’t feel like it is. More like part of Cuba.
Why Detroit fall so fast
How was Cleveland #8 in 1776 when Cleveland wasn’t founded until 1796?! Marietta was the first city in Ohio and it wasn’t founded until 1788. Definitely makes the rest of your data a little suspect. 🤦🏻♂️
This is most likely counting people who lived in the area before it was a city It’s kind of an obvious conclusion.
When did Black people become officially counted into the population? Did the 3/5 Compromise affect these numbers?
They were always counted and they went back to update the numbers to what actually should’ve been if they were counted as full people so that has absolutely nothing to do with modern day numbers or any of the numbers
WITHOUT the state indication,, some,,, we don't know where what thess cities are,,, come on,, state's prefix indication.....
My city has more than 8.1 million less than new york 😂😂
Man I live in Ireland and Newyork has more people then my entire country by over 2.5 million
Sarmat like this
2020 bruh
это что такое
Oh how the once-mighty have fallen. Decades of Dem rule will do that to once-great cities!
Los Angeles County is 3,000 sq miles and has roughly 17 million people in it at any given time so no wonder its traffic beats out metro NYC! LA city which in size is bigger than NYC (as is Chicago) should be doing more to keep people instead of garbage policies, the right mayor comes along and booms vertical housing and cleans that town up would keep LA right there but i think the county will suffer the same fate as the city. Basically what NYC is facing now as they did in the early 90's. I wonder if NYC will keep losing residents as well. I'll keep this vid in my saved favorites so 20 years from now maybe you can post updated figures!
Not true😮
@@Johnny-tv5tq 100% true
Louisville was in the top 10 in the 1800s... so they missed that one.
@@davidwalton3604
By 1850, Louisville had become the tenth largest city in the nation, with more than 43,000 people. It was a major port, with a thriving boatyard industry. It had a new university, was building a Catholic cathedral, and was organizing the Louisville and Nashville Railroad. Its streets had been lighted by gas for more than a decade; businesses and wealthy homes had interior gaslights. Prestige suburbs were developing in the rural area south of Broadway. But the underground sewer system had reached a length of only one and one-half miles.
@@davidwalton3604 I think there’s debate of that census. Because I’ve seen Louisville listed as a top 10 in that era. They the 1840s the civil war and then drops off in the early 1900 with the close of the steamboat era.
A
How did you leave out Atlanta with almost 5 million?
? Atlanta has less than 500,000 residents.
They are not looking at greater metro area.
No participation trophies for suburban sprawl 🙄🙄🙄
City proper
Phoenix would be far, far larger if you included metro area.
HI, Brooklyn, is NOT a city. It is a county (Named Kings) in NYC.
It used to be a city until 1898.
It was it's own seperate city for quite a while.
Is this including illegals?
Trump is that you? Don’t you have 100+ lawsuits to deal with?
@@jaengen Seek help for your TDS
Is this counting illegals?
Yes sir. Its call census
Milwaukee really hit the Top 10 and then retired
Boston and Pittsburgh TOP ❤
Where’s Atlanta?
In Georgia!!
This doesn’t include metro, which are useless