Video

there is no baby ----- asshole

is diana now going full retard to defend melanie swan sick need to create a baby

diana davison knows melanie swan never had a baby

problem is no baby

but some freak detective swan imagines in his mind and position he thinks just like a drunk

in your mind you are free .

do you really want my e mail from bueberger

melane swan never had a baby and that cost me 5 grand

it will b worth it

melanie swan lied in court about having a baby and joseph neuberger still thinks imaculate comseption

a sick judge david cole - come out and play

judge david cole knowing melanie swan never had a baby continued to harm me

it is not ok to use your position to harm

farrell huff can threaten melanie swan with death and nothing will happen

melanie swan never had a baby

meanie swan never had a baby

melanie swan never had a baby

melanie swan never ad a baby

mlanie swan never had a baby

melanie swan never had a baby

so a f'd up judge can harm me for not acceptng his f'd up mind

in writing - judge david cole and chief sanders knew melanie swan never had a baby

if I threaten to kill a baby that was never born will you charge melane swan

do you really want to play credibility

so if you get judge david cole back in court so I can jerk off in front of him and say " theres your evidence"

do you really think its OK to lie in court about having a baby

TPS knows and judge david cole knows that melanie swan never had a baby

The scale is definitely against the defendant. In my case there were multiple motives and red flags. The police, in their interviews with the complainant, avoided asking obvious questions that would sink their case.

If he doesn't give me 47 orgasms it's not consent

Just to say...the people that are watching your content are mostly educated. I wouldn't worry so much about applying too much explanation as it may infer a lack of capacity.

Great stuff. But if it had been the University of Edinburgh you would have said 'Scotland', not 'UK'.

Because you women misuse you unseen power you are worse than men like you women dont trap men

Are fucking serious ive livedbthrough you leftiesbsixntimesn

20:00 Diana nailed it. This is why I’ve followed her for years. Right on the money.

Don't a lot of people get out of jail much much earlier than their sentences though? Is this a common practice or a misconception on my part?

Honestly, I'm not too worried about this simply because I gave up on sex years ago. It's just one more reason to stay away from it. I miss it, but since even an attempt to get into a relationship (I'm not even talking about the sex along the road), for a guy is basically a suicide attempt, so this is just one more reason.

How he interrupts and commands her speech. Gross.

Are you able to give your opinion on a couple of situations, considering the information you provided? 1. What happens if a woman, when consenting to sex with a condom, pierces the condom herself? 2. What happens, if a sexual act with condom is consented to, subsequently extracts seminal fluid from the condom and inserts it into herself? In both cases there may be the intent to get pregnant or to imply that a condom wasn't used, to entrap.

They're not dissenting Justices, they're concuring Justices. I get why he wants to call the dissenting Justices. Just use the right language.

If the courts detach themselves from precedent that means all our rights are subject to future interpretation. A cop wants to search my car. I say no and he searches it anyway because he knows the existing law might change to allow his search. And all the rest, he might continue questioning me after I request a lawyer or go through my pockets during a Terry stop because by the time I reach the appeal stage all the legal precedents I have depended on might no longer be valid. If legal interpretation is dependent on public opinion police have no reason to respect any right I have because, as a general rule, the public is more than willing to ignore my rights if they think that the situation will never happen to them and if it is happening to me it is because I have done something wrong. In fact, there are legal organizations attacking the exclusionary rule constantly.

The Canadian Ministry of Truth

What is this word that sounds like, "visciating", please?

Joe, a question: Did the Supreme Court refer to work by LEAF in their decision?

Look Diana, you have to get off the sauce (stop drinking). We love your work, old and new, but you are harming yourself with drink. Go to AA, get help, please, for your own sake.

Shoes: czcams.com/video/IU0exWwhMic/video.html

I honestly don’t know how this podcast isn’t one of the most popular podcasts on CZcams for legal coverage.

I think someone is drunk.

You guys are a great "lense"

Follwo Not On Record on Twitter: @NotOnRecord