Video

Today people replaced the white imperialists with black skinned Indian who are destroying our country .they helped fugitives Luke Vijay malya, modis ,nirav etc run with our money and taunted the Indians in the name of religion and divided Indians to promote their vested interests. They drain huge amount with the IPL and Bollywood whom people adore and treat them as their role models . So Indians are responsible for they were greedy, selfish , high castes reserved and marginalized the low castes which exist till today

Hard to listen to the story with a sound effect every 5sec 😢

The fact that breaks me is that when they migrated to the UK in 1970’s , they were greeted with upmost hostility and racism

Hii! I loved your videos please keep putting these stories out they are so underappreciated! so is your work the animation the story telling all deserves so much more appreciation!! I notice you guys have put further reading in your description box but I was wondering if you can add references to your description box as well so it can make audience easily read more about the sources and information more accessible! thanks <3

Referring to the country as she made me cringe so hard so often.

One thing to note on this though. A united centralised india is a British creation. Yes it had moments of some unity but it functioned more like the holy roman empire where the many states were in a loose empire. If it had been left to itself its likely it would have developed into many different countries similar to how europe looks now.

Are they the oing boing coconut tribes?

Better to read real history books written by professors than poorly researched American flashy click bait videos.

Would be great if you could change this to THE ENGLISH....as a Welsh native I feel although we are part of Britain, Wales was also going through its own form of colonialism and torture by the English at exactly the same time

Hey anyone ever notice that the “democratic international world order” is just the colonial countries? This isn’t just history, the great collective lie that they’re a positive force upon the world is still being perpetuated today. Remember, none of these countries would’ve given up their colonies if they didn’t go bankrupt from destroying each other in WWII. So next time you hear about “free countries”, remember that it equates with colonial countries. And don’t forget to notice how “authoritarian dictatorships” all happen to be countries that resist their colonial grabs.

Stop calling him indian king. Call him telugu king. When krishnadeva raya existed there was no india . Do your research you fool

A quick error correction. Your video is yet another American anti British lie. Who needs enemies when we have allies like you.

Yet, in modern times they still look up to British culture. 🤬

It's pathetic how none of you can be bothered to read any scholarly works.

So was colonialism good or bad? Sounds like a rising tide raises all ships.

Nothing like vilifying a whole people glad no one learned anything. India was made up of many peoples, religions, and cultures. If it wasn't for Britain India Would have never unified

One important question to ask: Was there any nation called India before India before colonisation by the British?

Indians were already conquered & oppressed by millennia of feudalism, caste & local aristocracies. British just exploited the existing system. Indias overthrow of British was the making of modern indian renaissance if feudal Brahmanical oppression & superstition can finally be done with. Karma returned on the British in WWI & WWII.

The mistake of Indians ŵas that they failed to invest in military military; and bickering among themselves they became vulnerable to conquests.

So the lesson is, don’t let the British take over or you’re f*****. I am still pretty hazy on how the British took over, you kind of hand waved that away. You said there was a power vacuum that went on for 10 years before they took over. Did they just happen to show up after 10 years and all the industrialized people had killed each other already? Were the Indians good at manufacturing but bad at governance? I heard from another source that the British just had small trading posts for a long time and they won popular support from the peasantry because they would actually police unlike the indigenous government. I don’t doubt that it was as bad as you say but it is not at all clear how a much smaller country took over a much bigger one that was also industrialized.

Because the Europeans brought deodorant.

Funny how Indias population was static at only 200 million for over 1000 years before Britain colonised it. Within 100 years of British rule it had increased to 250 million and by 1947 it had shot up to 350 million. Famines happened under British rule, but they had always happened. Before the Industrial revolution, (solely the work of the British) famines happened regularly, everywhere. These are strange types of extra genocide and famines that dramatically increase the population after 1,000 years of a stagnent population under other rulers. I wonder how that happened? Also, how come only 30,000 British troops thousands of miles from home could keep the peace against 250 million Indians in a country the British troops were not aclimitised to? Were the British supermen? Also, how come so many Indians volunteered to fight for the British Empire in both world wars and others? Could it be that maybe a great many Indians saw considerable advantages of being in the British Empire and so co-operated with it? That seems likely to me. Also slavery was common throughout the world, including in India, before it was abolished single-handedly by the British Empire. (Conveniently forgotten by almost everybody in the world). Maybe some of the Indian taxes went on that? Could it be that this video is not telling the whole truth? Could it be that without the British Empire and the industrial revolution that the Empire powerfully sponsored, that the entire world would still be living in the 16th century? There was nothing inevitable about the industrial revolution, if Newcomen had not invented the steam engine to kick it off, it almost certainly would never have happened at all and we would all still be living in horrendous medieval conditions.

Sad that now India sides with colonizers (Israel, US).

I am sure that Indians could have kept their industry if colonisers had not disrupted it, however one has to realise that if the British had not colonised India then it would certainly have been the French, and world colonial history suggests that would have been a lot worse - see Vietnam.

I really doubt that the British killed more people in India than Mao. Out from that, very informative video 👍.

As an Indonesian myself, we do lost a lot from VOC and Dutch Colonization, even we colonized two times longer than India. But we are recovering together my brothers and sisters. The moment when i saw the news that you guys landing on the moon for the first time, i'm tearing feel proud of y'all 🥺 Warm greetings from Indonesia 🙌🏼 🇮🇩🤝🇮🇳

Note that indirectly Indian $$ funded the founding of the US

I appreciate this video. Even now, people need to learn.

EVIL EVIL EVIL...

This is the most willfully ignorant tirade currently available on Utube. India was not even a country when the British arrived! Vast sections of the sub-continent were desperate to be protected by the association with the British. The economic and social punishment you describe are transparently fictitious and libellous. Certainly there were abuses by the British East India Company and others, but this is way over the top.

So basically everybody is mixed and the entire humanity is one..dont fight brothers..we are all connected in some way.

I'd be very curious about a possible follow up video: With far less people than India, why did 18th century Americans almost immediately revolt against the oppressive British and their taxes well before things got out of hand, but the Indians let the Brits ravage their country for over two centuries? Maybe someone knows the answer to that question.

horrible britain horrible people

Bribe is still the biggest problem in Indian subcontinent. 😢

If it wasn't for the British. Indian would be 100% Muslim by now. Why do people seem to Indian was even a nation before the British. It wasn't even an idea to the native people. Its just totally racist for people to say the British could not rule Indian but Asaf-ud-Daula could, because he was brown and not white. Then is video is made by the Chinese gov

Wow! an American decrying the British for the treatment of Indians, the irony! oh the irony!

The Brits are pure evil

"The "Aryan Majesty" is evidently the Aryan power or state, political, social and religious. It is simply the Aryan greatness and supremacy. ... For the infidels whom it conquers are creatures..., even, as these make it unprosperous, the annihilation of the sickness was necessary to the existence of the majesty. The existence of one involved the annihilation of the other..... "You hardly utter a sentence of our Romance tongue, without speaking some word which was spoken in the same sense by that ancient people, ten thousand years ago or more, in the mountain-valleys which they first inhabited. You have their idiosyncrasies of thought, the same indelible characteristics of race; for you are their descendants. From them you have your excellencies & your faults, your energy, your vigor of intellect, your philosophical cast of thought, your indomitable resolution, your persistent pursuit of the object you desire to attain; from them the religious leanings & inclinations of your minds; from them your social institutions & relations, & the foundation-stones of your laws, customs, habits; from them all your philosophical & religious doctrines. They were white men, as we are, the superior race in intellect, in manliness, the governing race of the world, the conquering race of all the races. They called themselves Arya, the Aryans, the Warlike, or, some think, the Noble. " [Lectures of the Arya, Albert Pike, 1930, Lecture One: The Aryan Race] "The example of Bolivia has shown that once the Indian begins voting, he has little common cause with large landowning or industrial interests. Thus the best hope for the status quo is to keep the Indian ignorant, sick, poverty stricken, & politically impotent." [The Great Shark Hunt, Hunter S. Thompson, 1977, Part 3, The Inca of the Andes: He Haunts the ruins of His Once Great Empire, p. 418] "The Anglo-American System... had no place for the Indian. If the latter could of his own initiative find subsistence within the framework, there was a priori nothing to prevent such adjustment. But if there was any conflict whatsoever with the system, the native was to be estimated ruthlessly, either by outright extermination or the slower method of segregation in ghettolike reservations." (S.F. Cook, The Conflict Between California Indians and White Civilization, II, Ibero-American: 22, University of California Press, 1943, Berkley) [Indians of California: Past and Present, American Friends Service Committee] 'The Residential School System' "Irene Couchie Dupuis was among approximately 150,000 First Nations, Métis, and Inuit children some as young as four - who, for over a century, were removed from their homes and sent to live at residential schools across Canada. The schools were created and funded by the federal government in the belief that Indigenous peoples were uncivilized and needed to be "saved" from themselves. In reality, that "education" cost Indigenous children the loss of their families and communities, their Indigenous languages, and their traditions. The schools were run by Roman Catholic, Presbyterian, United, and Anglican churches and were staffed by nuns, priests, and teachers. Rules were strict, conditions harsh. Children were poorly fed; infectious diseases thrived; many students died alone and far from home. Basic skills and trades were taught, but generally children were overworked, and the quality of education was poor. Those who broke the rules were punished. Most of the children felt lonely, isolated, and unloved." [Uncited book]

As if the local corruption has nothing to do with it too

South East Asian history has never really been talked about. The western world wants to erase our history.

France and African gold in 2023....

"In North America alone, it is estimated that the British Empire killed more than 50 million indigenous people between 1492 and 1900. And it is not just indigenous peoples who were killed by the British Empire... According to estimates by Tharoor, 35 million Indians were killed by British policies in the aftermath of several famines... While it is impossible to know exactly how many people were killed by the British Empire by 1914, estimates range from tens of millions to upwards of 100 million people. The true number will likely never be known, but what is certain is that the British Empire was responsible for the deaths of millions of people during its time.... The British Empire was built on sweat and blood. Over the centuries, the British military has been involved in wars all over the world in order to protect the British Empire and its citizens from invaders. The British Empire provided stability and prosperity to the world. Many countries have established democracy as a result." [The British Empire: A History Of Killing Millions, Patricia Smith, Historic Cornwall, Dec 11, 2022] www.historic-cornwall.org.uk/the-british-empire-a-history-of-killing-millions/ "Slavery to monarchs and ministers, which the world will be long in freeing itself from itself from, and whose deadly grasp stops the progress of the human mind, is not yet abolished." [A Vindication of the Rights of Women, Mary Wollstonecraft, 1797, 3: The Same Subject Continued] "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them." [THE "MISSING THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT": CONSTITUTIONAL NONSENSE AND TITLES OF NOBILITY, JOL A. SILVERSMITH, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTERDISCIPLINARY LAW JOURNAL] "In the Anglosphere, and especially in America, many believed that the liberties of the Anglo-Saxons had been destroyed by the Norman Conquest in 1066.14 [14 See, e.g., DAVID HUME, 1 HISTORY OF ENGLAND 160-85, 194-98, 208, 226-27 (Liberty Fund 1983) (1778); id. at 226-27 (“[I]t would be difficult to find in all history a revolution more destructive, or attended with a more complete subjection of the antient {anti -+Gr. ethnikos gentile: Webster's, 1943} inhabitants.”); id. at 437 (the majority of Anglo-Saxons were reduced “to a state of real slavery”); FORREST MCDONALD, NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM: THE INTELLECTUAL ORIGINS OF THE CONSTITUTION 76-77 (1985) (noting influence of “the Norman yoke” in American Revolution ideology); CHARLES WRIGHT & KENNETH W. GRAHAM, JR, FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 6342, at n. 80-107 (summarizing the common view of Americans and of English Whigs about the imposition of “the Norman yoke” in 1066).]" [THE POSSE COMITATUS AND THE OFFICE OF SHERIFF: ARMED CITIZENS SUMMONED TO THE AID OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, DAVID B. KOPEL, 2015]

"The Sackler family, a sprawling and now feuding transatlantic dynasty, is famous in cultural and academic circles for decades of generous philanthropy towards some of the world’s leading institutions, from Yale University to the Guggenheim Museum in the US and the Serpentine Gallery to the Royal Academy in Britain. But what’s less well known, though increasingly being exposed, is that much of their wealth comes from one product - OxyContin, the blockbuster prescription painkiller first launched in 1996. The pill is stronger than morphine and sparked the opioid crisis that’s now killing more than 100 people a day in America and has spawned millions of addicts. It’s also attracted a wave of lawsuits alleging ongoing deception about the safety of OxyContin, which the company had previously admitted misbranding in a 2007 criminal case. Two branches of the family control Purdue Pharma, which makes OxyContin but, unlike their company, none of the Sacklers are personally being sued over it." www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/feb/13/meet-the-sacklers-the-family-feuding-over-blame-for-the-opioid-crisis CHATGPT: The legal systems within the Anglosphere, which are largely influenced by English Common Law, do not typically have penalties as severe as those mentioned in the Hittite law you referenced. Capital punishment for sexual offenses is generally not part of modern legal frameworks in Anglosphere countries. Instead, legal systems in these countries typically rely on a range of criminal penalties, which may include imprisonment, fines, probation, and other forms of punishment. The severity of the penalty often depends on the specific offense, its circumstances, and the laws of the jurisdiction in question. While the principle of restitution is not as prominent in modern Western legal systems as it might have been in ancient Hittite law, contemporary legal approaches often focus on justice, rehabilitation, and protecting the rights of victims within the framework of established laws and human rights standards. "First, we must understand that English common law is not civil law."... "Like the rest of creation, man is subject to laws laid down by the Creator. Man, unlike the rest of creation, has a certain degree of free will, but, says Blackstone, even this free will is governed and limited by God's law. Furthermore, man is not left to his own, fumbling around in search of an elusive law; rather God has affirmatively revealed His law so that man may find it acceptable." [Sir William Blackstone & the Common Law, Robert Stacey, Ph. D., 2003, p. 47 & 61] CHATGPT: While it is true that legal systems, including common law, are designed to address claims of authority, property, and other matters, the characterization of common law as inherently designed to protect unlawful claims of authority may be overly broad. Common law systems, including the English Common Law, provide a framework for resolving disputes, interpreting laws, and ensuring justice. Common law is based on precedents and judicial decisions, and it allows for the evolution of legal principles over time. While some argue that common law systems provide flexibility and adaptability, others may critique potential ambiguities or gaps in the law. Civil law systems, on the other hand, typically rely more heavily on codified laws and statutes, offering a more comprehensive and structured legal framework. Each legal tradition has its strengths and weaknesses, and the effectiveness of a legal system often depends on various factors, including its implementation, interpretation, and adaptability. It's crucial to recognize that legal systems can vary significantly between jurisdictions, and generalizations may not capture the nuances of individual systems or their application in specific cases. Discussions on the merits of different legal traditions are ongoing within legal scholarship and practice. ME: But common law inherently establishes, protects and expands peerages claims of title, ownership, and amnesty, correct? CHATGPT: Common law does recognize and protect certain property rights, titles, and legal concepts, but it would be an oversimplification to say that it inherently establishes, protects, and expands peerages claims of title, ownership, and amnesty. Common law systems, such as the English Common Law, have evolved over centuries and encompass a wide range of legal principles. In terms of property rights and titles, common law provides a framework for determining ownership, resolving disputes, and establishing legal principles through judicial decisions and precedents. While the protection of property rights is a fundamental aspect of common law, it is not limited to peerages claims; it applies to individuals and entities across society. Similarly, common law includes principles related to individual rights, legal responsibilities, and due process. The concept of amnesty may be more closely associated with legal or executive discretion rather than being an inherent aspect of common law. It's important to recognize that common law systems are complex, dynamic, and adaptable. They provide mechanisms for addressing a wide range of legal issues and are shaped by judicial decisions, statutes, and legal traditions. As with any legal system, the interpretation and application of common law can vary, and generalizations may not capture the full diversity of its principles and applications.

The level of evil is astonishing. Even we in Europe who never had power were used like that, but India is truly something else entirely. The whole history regarding the west’s exploitation of India and China is horrific and should be condemned by all countries, including those who caused them.

IT'S ALWAYS THE WHITE MAN

So again, we can see how State central planning and taxes destroy whole countries, also the excandalous construction of trains is like the overlypriced homeless houses California is paying for...

The British empire did NOT help ordinary British workers , just a few rich people.

Only a very few rich British people gained anything from empire . Indian cooton led to sacking of thousands of Lancs weavers

Sadly the video is full of sh** and lies, just from the begining the percentage in 1700 Indian Economy is just false. Also why it don´t explain how so few british coul have taken contro of an entire subcontinent, if it were so rich and united... short answer, it wan´t. Also Mighal Empire were invasors, they were mongols and practiced sunni religion, it was already "occupy" by foreigners.

Why do we keep calling him the indian machivelli?? chanakya was born in 375 B.C, He wrote the arthashastra long before Machiavelli was born (in 1469), It should be Machiavelli who should be known as the Italian Chanakya🤷‍♂️