Your further comments have been brought to my attention. I have not looked at the entire video and don't have either the time or inclination to do so. For the 6 minutes and 33 seconds that I have endured looking at your self-serving and manipulative comments, you have neglected to point out that my objection was to the defamatory, inflammatory and untrue assertion contained in the title of your video , which you have been wise enough not to repeat. You are obviously clever and talented but also adept at presenting yourself as a victim when you brazenly lie about people and make untrue accusations, patently to increase your following. Your conduct throughout has been dishonourable and I'd suggest you look to your conscience, if you have one. As for your assertion that you didn't have the time to act upon your commitment to remove the defamatory posting, my technical people inform me that you were indeed keeping abreast of the situation and were therefore able to remove it, but failed to do so in as timely a manner as was required. I have treated you throughout with a degree of consideration that you have neither deserved nor reciprocated - I will remind you that you took care to acknowledge how generously I had treated you - and my final word to you, as someone who is old enough to be your mother and maybe even your grandmother, is: You are bright and gifted enough to develop a successful career without resorting to the deviousness, manipulativeness, and ultimate dishonesty which you are displaying as you try to present yourself as my victim when you and I both know that you are the one who lied. It will be interesting to see if you keep this comment posted or if you will display the manipulative skills you have hitherto demonstrated by continuing to flip things.
You can keep degrading my character, but if you can’t be bothered to finish a video before you run with a narrative, I’m afraid it’s not bolstering your credibility as a person who does impeccable research.
Do we, the public, have to politely request Lady c to at least look up the true video of the incident for confirmation who is right or who is wrong. Then FFS put this to bed and prove who is the bigger man on this occasion. To add to this, if you are so well informed with the Royal family as you yourself have said (HMTLQ had passed ) before the people knew All I'm asking you to do is ask HRM King Charles if he told the teacher( Diana played piano better than he played chello ) that's all.
@@susanmclellan6447we know. That’s why Cheere’s not reading the book anymore and we don’t want to hear from LC either. LC’s an unreliable narrator and keeps showing up in the comments to prove it.
I haven’t seen many videos because I can’t really understand her accent but she says “sue me” in each one that I have seen. She’s been saying who she is, I certainly believe her now. The cattiness is just beyond anything remotely lady like
Yes! Lady Colin loves to quote Heraclitus' "Character is destiny." Odd, clever, old woman. Bad day. She should have had a martini instead of lashing out at this lovely girl.
@@lizaltieri Yes. In a recent interview she ("Lady C") said, "“It does not behoove us to sully our soul.” But apparently she wasn't listening to herself when she said it.
Gosh, what a tossed salad of words on repeat to bully you into a response in her favour. I'm glad you've stood your ground. This is integrity in action. Cheere, I love being part of your community and will look forward to another book review when your ready.
I was worried the video would end like that. I am really entertained by Cheere, so gosh I hope nothing ever scares her off. She looks tougher than that though. 😊
As a very busy working person, I truly enjoy your book reviews. Your funny voices, the wry commentary & your excellent reading voice, make the reviews most enjoyable. I have great confidence, you are a Gifted School Teacher. Don't let some thin skinned, woke author deter you. You have many new fans Keep up the good work. 👍😊
I saw a video where Charles played the cello. Diana was also there and a man asked her to play the piano. The scene was not as Lady C said. I am amazed at her mean and cruel response
They were being good sports during s visit and professional in their conduct. Diana seemed a little embarrassed while playing the piano;?but definitely didn’t do anything to upstage Charles, who good naturedly played a few notes on the cello.
For a older woman she is quite childish getting offended over a reasonable question and answering in a moment of unfounded rage. You were right to not finish it as it is a complete waste of time and I will note to never buy any of her books
Ironically, yes. I just wrote almost the same thing. Vengeance is paramount. That bitter anger is creeeeepy, really, particularly given the power differential. Utterly unfitting of a “dignified lady.”
@@Bindi728 You are very wise. Differing opinions about this matter and who is "right", have gotten heated and personal, with some comments. As someone else wise pointed out, we are squabbling about a woman--Diana--who died in 1997.
My heart goes out to you, I can hear the hurt in your voice, and I know that feeling. I am so incredibly sorry that anyone has treated you so cruely and unjustly on a global platform. Lady C is certainly no "lady" having degraded herself to the hysterical, irresponsible, knee-jerk shaming of another. For all her 80+ years of acquired knowledge, she is still a gravely damaged malignant narcissist who came from an abusive family of addicts and abusive marriage. None of which has made her KIND. I pray this experience inflicted upon you grounds you deeper in wisdom, kindness, and generosity, and that any future poison barbs of the lickspittle be deflected by your armor of TRUTH. Keep those nasty comments pinned and wear this revelation as a badge of honor!! You have unmasked a master, BRAVO!! 💜
I literally never comment on CZcams videos, but I feel compelled to on this. I absolutely love your channel. Your Harry and Meghan content got me through so many nights of pregnancy insomnia last summer. You made me laugh when all I wanted to do was cry. It’s like I found a kindred spirit. I hope you do not take one person’s criticism of your work too personally, no matter how famous (or perhaps infamous is a better word) the critic may be. Her reaction really says all the world needs to know about her. If she can’t handle a someone questioning her work, maybe she’s the one in the wrong profession.
Cheere Denise is a wonderful reader! The voices are uncanny. But also the sense of humor and the asides. Cheere Denise really ADDS to what is on the page. I can understand why authors are thrilled when you read their books. For one thing, you have such a keen interest in people, relationship dynamics, and history.
I am totally flabbergasted that expressing an opinion or doubt could stir up such a storm. This could have been handled in a much more civilized and discreet manner. I stand by you and your decision to step away from the mess but also to not be bullied. Keep up the good work. You’re awesome.
I saw that yesterday! I was surprised that she had such a strong reaction. IMO she should have contacted you privately and without the personal attacks she made. I think you held your own and did the right thing. I understand your POV. Please do keep doing your good work here! I thoroughly enjoy your channel. It's like being in a big book club.
Holy cow! What a stunning over reaction … and horrendous attack. She just keeps bludgeoning you with her “eloquence” … and kept doubling down .. I’m so disappointed in how she handled this. Shows her character! I stand behind your decision!
So I imagine we’d all like to be seen by a relatively known author. I guess not like this! However, ask yourself why she decided to comment. Did you strike a nerve? Why did she overreact on here, at you, using her own book? You had a legitimate concern! You teach and you didn’t want to expose us to anything but truth! Wow….there is no copyright infringement issue here. Has she done this before to anyone? Why you? Why would she go after someone now because of an opinion? This is odd to me. We’re all supposed to accept what another person says? You basically fact-checked her and saw something else! Any professional in her field would not be so offended if she thought she was correct. Wouldn’t you dust off someone if you absolutely knew the truth behind a story and they were indeed wrong?
I'm quite shocked at Lady C's reaction which was totally uncalled for in my opinion. Regardless, your channel is in my top 5 that I check for now posts every day. I will continue to follow and can't wait to see what you choose to read next..there are soooo many to choose from!! We're all behind you 💯%!!!! Gird your loins 😂 love it!!!
I had unsubscribed from Lady C just after Queen Elizabeth II died. She had only just passed and Lady C felt it necessary to reveal that the Queen had died of bone cancer. I was appalled by that. It seemed to me that she was trying to get that info out "first" so that she could be seen as someone who was "in the know". For me and I think many others, the cause of death was irrelevant. We were saddened and didn't care what the Queen's diagnosis had been. Recently, I had been enjoying some of the interviews Lady C had done with other youtubers to promote the release of her updated book. I considered resubscribing to her channel even though I too had difficulty understanding her speech. Never thought to increase the playback speed as another commenter mentioned, lol. After reading the comments she made to you however, I will not be listening to anything she has to say in the future. I really hope you don't take anything she said to heart. Can't wait to hear the next book review! Read on!!
The old bag had been hinting at bone cancer for many months prior to the Queens death....it was easy to pick up on - especially as she kept emphasizing when making comment about 'to her very BONES'.
Lady C said in one of her most recent podcasts that she was made aware of the queens death and was asked by whom I’m not sure to do something with the information as Harry and his wife would maybe do something, I’m assuming publicly.
You made absolutely the right decision and in doing so maintained the high ground. Her loss. Your integrity, questioning mind and balanced critique make you a joy to watch. Don’t roll in the mud with her.
I absolutely agree with your decision to stay away from her books and remove all videos of her book. She doesn't deserve the promotion of her possible lies and exaggerations. Don't waist a single second to her. I will still be here when you come back with a new book. Stay strong and God bless ❤
Dear Cheere Denise, I was greatly impressed by the measured and wise way that you responded to the outrageous attacks by Lady C. That must have taken great self control, especially under the pressure of work and family demands. It must be shocking to be attacked like this. It’s so out of the normal realm of experience. And a deeply exhausting strain. So, please know that your questions and concerns were completely appropriate, valid and appreciated. You expressed them respectfully and responsibly. Your gut instincts have been right all along and that’s always a valuable lesson for ourselves and to pass on one day to our children. I hope you’ll be able to shake it all off and, with spring soon here, look forward to fresh beginnings for yourself and your family in every good and joyful sense. You’ve surely earned it! I wish you well! 💕🌷💕
Wow, Lady C has done herself a great disservice and exhibited a real lack of restraint. I knew she was capable of spewing vitriol but I thought she would be a lot more measured publicly.
That’s what I find so surprising, too. It’s such a public display of her (in my opinion) being out of control, sending one post on the heels of another. In my opinion, it is not a good look.
That is exactly what this channel was aiming for, if you see it for what it is 'click bait' then you may have a different perspective. Compare and contrast is a wonderful tool, I suggest you do more reading on Diana by various authors and you will understand a bit more.
I'd say, take time to process this. To give vent to all the feelings. To mourn, to scream if you have to, to cry. And then to take care of yourself, Ms. Cheere Denise. And to know that you have so many people who watch and listen to you as if you are a modern day Scheherazade.
Denise...DONT LET IT BOTHER YOU. You are right. She can obviously be very nasty and cruel. You hit a nerve. Sounds like your perspective may well have been correct.❤
I have enjoyed listening to you over the past few months. Your videos on Spare and Revenge were so entertaining and kept me coming back for more. I'm sorry about what has happened. I hope you continue to review books about royals and other interesting topics. Kee up the good work!!
I understand but you are being very hard on yourself. I agree with you I don’t think she was acting like Lady C described in that instance. I appreciate your content and honesty. Thank you !
Shocking because Lady C has said she believes in free speech and also against slander. I unsubscribed from her. Because I too have seen her mean and gossip side and I have ignored it. I’m very happy you shared this.
The pomposity of Lady C is amazing. She could have cited her source for the Charles cello incident to you. She didn’t. I’ve written magazine articles and have had no less than three sources for each fact. If anyone had questioned me, I could cite several sources and she couldn’t cite one source? You did right. I can’t stand Lady C anyway. She has the shrill voice of a gossipy fish wife. Let’s move on to a reputable author.
That is the main criticism of Lady C. Her books are fun reads but she does not cite sources. The sources are her social contacts and want to remain off the record. So she probably knows a lot that others don’t, but some of it may be gossip.
She made it up, I’m convinced of it now. To come at this young lady like this is outrageous & uncalled for, if she was telling the truth she wouldn’t respond the way she did.
Well handled , you showed Lady C that you are not intimidated by her threats and kept your own dignity. I look forward to whatever book you choose to review next
Wow, I am at a loss of words here! So sorry about this ordeal. I respect the way in which you have conducted yourself. The respect with which you have treated this lady regardless of the venom dripping off her words directed at you speaks volumes of who you are. Stand strong 🌷. Looking forward to your next book review.
I support you Cheere ❤ I will be here and I will continue to enjoy wonderful insights. I'm sorry this happened to you. Its unfortunate, but moving on........ God bless you beautiful!
So it is fine for you that this ner do well , who knows nothing about British aristocracy attacks the integrity of the author of the persons book she is reading to profit by calling her a LIAR. I hope lady C has her buried in copyright and she is taken down.
I’m so done with “Lady” C. I’ve never really liked her and have a difficult time understanding her when she talks. Now I wonder how much she really knows.
The only way to understand her is to put her on 1.25x speed. I'm not saying she lied about what happened in this particular part of her book, but she definatly overreacted, and it's odd because if she's telling the truth she shouldn't react that way at all.
She is very pedantic when it comes to language which does make her hard to understand at times, both in writing and speaking. According to her book "Daughter of Narcissist, she and her mother would compete in vocabulary and who can come up with the most new words. I especially dislike when she throws in french words that make the entire sentence a mystery. Since I don't speak french I can't look the word up because I don't know how to spell it! 🤣🤣
I appreciate your thoughtful and measured response to this unwarranted attack by Lady C. I hope it’s some consolation that your instincts regarding her work proved to be true. Your decision to remove all your videos about her book except for the one in question was the correct choice, in my view. I admire your honesty, integrity, and courage. It can’t have been easy to stand your ground but that is what needs to be done with bullies. Please enjoy a break to clear your head and lighten your heart. I look forward to following along with your next book selection. 🙏🌸
Let it go, Cheer! I love your questioning of all authors you read! I’m a teacher in Texas and you are an inspiration to me. For 31 years, I have taught that we should always question everything we read. I can’t imagine dealing with this at school! Jeez! Love your work! Trust your gut, girl!
Me thinks the lady protests too much. 😅😂 That is what one of her fans said to me in the comments when I tried to explain my questioning about her video. It didn't add up. This didn't matter because I was supposed to take note and never question Lady C . I blocked them that way they can't see me and most importantly I don't see me . 😅
Without a doubt! She went for the juggler with the intention of ripping Cheere apart! And wouldn’t stop! A few sentences would have sufficed but apparently her rage was not that easily quelled.
@@desertsunset8025. Actually she didn’t. I am an Aussie woman, 76, who was there when this happened in real time as it happened, not an edited video. Lady C was correct.
Hang in there girl - you are the BEST book reviewer I know - chin up, all will be well. We will wait until you are ready to bring us the next book xxxx
Cheere, thank you for standing your ground against such a vicious person. I continue to admire your honesty, graciousness, and poise in the face of such an attack. I agree wholeheartedly with your decision to drop this “Lady” from any further discussion on your wonderful channel. I and many others wish you well and look forward to your next fascinating read! 🙏🏻❤️🙏🏻
Thankyou for reading this book. You are a very bright lady and it's a shame that this has happened. I love your honesty and adherence to your values. Your Mother and Father and families are so fortunate to have you in their lives! You have highlighted Lady C's motive!
You respectfully questioned one thing--one--and she hits the roof. Unbelievable (and thin-skinned, absolutely). Interesting, how someone so fond of calling out Meghan Markle for being a bully turns out to be one herself. You did not deserve that tirade. I'm sorry you had to endure that.
I'm not sure it was respectfully questioned. And I do disagree with Cheere's interpretation of that video. I agree with Lady C's interpretation. Besides, it wasn't just her interpretation, it was the story of the day back when it happened.
@@Anna_Key You are correct. It was NOT respectfully questioned. The original title was "This is a Huge Lie". In the video itself, she repeats that it is a "a glaring lie". Then she asks us if this means that maybe everything that Lady C wrote is a lie. And then she puts up this poor me video claiming that all she did was ask a simple question.
@valgardener7656. Yes, I witnessed that the original video was titled "This is a huge lie" along side 3 alarms. Cheere put the video in "private" long enough to edit the title to try and hoodwink the viewers. Very sneeky to say the least. I'm coming from a place of being a fan from the early days, when CD reviewed Spare and later on I shed a tear with Cheere when she opened up about her mother. I actually shed a tear! The scales have fallen from my eyes now! CD has been incredibly rude, sarcastic, dismissive and patronising in the comments. If the alarm bells weren't ringing loud enough 10 days ago, they certainly are now. A mask seems to have dropped and she is jumping all over it. I'm not taken in by it anymore. Did you see the look to camera after she quoted LC talking about her education? Tongue jut and pure teenage fury.
@@Lilyannshaw I sussed her a minute or two into the video, but in my defence I have years of training to watch out for the slightest muscle movement in the face. Joyous to be able to unmask a masquerade very early on, saves years of wasting your energy on a fraud! (which I have also been guilty of!)
I support you entirely and think you've made the right decision. You did not deserve that. You are fantastic at what you do, and I love your channel, its like listening to a friend. Take all the time you need and I'm sure we will all be looking forward to finding out what book you choose to share with us next. Sending a hug from the UK x
Cheere, Please don't give Lady C another thought. Clearly she is just a bitter old woman (and I say that as someone who is not too far behind her in age). She truly thinks way too highly of herself and I consider anything but a lady.
She definitely came out VERY poorly. It’s hard to believe that she is comfortable to be so spiteful in public comments. I can’t wait to hear your next book!!
Oh honey, I’m so sorry this happened. Lady C really jumped the shark by attacking your character. Nobody deserves to be publicly humiliated in such a manner. Please take all the time you need to collect yourself before coming back on. Take care and God bless.
@@laurasalo6160 was just about to say that myself. for someone to whom class and manners are so central to her brand, she really shoot herself in the foot. she really seems like piece of work. i as well, like many, always felt a bit off about Lady C, but often ended up watching this or that. now she helped me put the finger on it 😊 i dont think i will waste my time anymore on her bad juju. kudos to you, cheere, for standing your ground!
Good grief. The punishment doesn't fit the "crime." Her attack on you is like calling in the swat team because she got bit by an ant. She's challenging YOUR integrity? You showed what true integrity is, and choosing to move away from this toxic situation is commendable. I am no longer interested in anything she has to say. Her comments to you are uncalled for. Snarky and bullying. I stand with you.
I have to agree that questioning Cheerie’s integrity is just ridiculous especially since C. did all this work and took it down just so she can be sure she isn’t spreading falsehoods!
I’m new to your channel and I enjoy your content. I hardly ever comment to a creator but I really had to this time. I applaud you for not cowering when someone with more “recognition” came after you and tried to bully you and intimidate you. I also saw the difference between what was written in the book and what the actual video recording displayed and I agreed with you - the book didn’t portray the event the way someone viewing it would have; it wasn’t this terrible behavior by Diana to upstage Charles at all. Well --- I guess recollections do vary!! Can’t wait to see what book you choose next to review on your channel. Stay strong.
Very well said! Many times I’ve felt that Lady C was being callous and cruel but I chose to overlook it because she seemed to have juicy insider gossip. That’s on me. I ought to have taken a more principled stand and boycotted her channel the first time this became clear to me. But this OTT response to Cheere is unconscionable. I’ve unsubscribed from Lady C’s channel and cancelled my preorder for her recent book. Lady C has shown her true colours. In my opinion (emphasis for legal reasons), Lady C is a mean girl and a bully. She has proven herself to be unworthy of my further time and attention.
Once I saw Lady C on "I'm a celebrity, get me out of here", I understood what type of person she really is. I absolutely loved your coverage of Traitor King btw - I had just read it, and was so happy you chose it, and basically voiced what I had thought of it Keep up the great work! 🙂
I posted this message on the previous video and just finished watching this one. So I just wanted to reiterate what I previously posted. Hang in there! ❤ This is exactly why I unsubscribed from @LadyColinCampbellCZcams channel! She is mean and a bully!!! Those messages were written by a spiteful and vengeful person. My Cheere, I can tell your feelings were hurt and it’s okay to be hurt but you are better than her! You are a TEACHER that’s helping young people to be something in life and that takes a special kind of person! You are not a gossiper repeating second hand stories like her. What a sad old woman with no purpose or legacy but to sit on a couch gossiping with her dogs! The video you showed told the truth and I believe you. You did nothing wrong. My friend, teachers are in the same class as doctors, nurses, firefighters, police officers, etc. you all are special and courageous people! Brush off those tears and vile person. On Monday morning, hold your head up and strut like Naomi Campbell down your hallway into your classroom, to the lunchroom, to the teachers lounge, and then to your car! We got you Cheere! Blessings.
The hyperbole and histrionics, in her reaction, seems to suggest that you were right about her book being, questionably, full of hyperbole and histrionics ... oh the blessed irony of it all.
omg, that could explain a lot. I find myself searching for any insight on how a professional author could possibly have (in my opinion) spewed vitriol uncontrollably all over a public page. That series of posts one right after the other in my opinion suggested someone utterly out of control. Why would she purposefully undermine the public presentation of her good judgment and her self-professed “balanced” treatment of her topics? (quoted from her earlier videos in which she discusses her “balanced” treatment of topics). Hadn’t thought of the possibility before.
Maybe some form of cognitive degeneration? A dear friend's mom suffered from this, and her extreme rages were shocking! She'd been a lovely, humorous woman until the illness progressed. Just speculating here, nothing more.
Lady C has also had her description of Meghan's bump slip questioned, as the photo of the purported bump slip wasn't taken where she claimed it was. I think it was TRG who pointed out the error. So she must be smarting over that as well.
Yes I saw that podcast from Grift and it’s the first time anyone has pointed out the different background when the bump was supposed to have slipped after exiting that building. Shows how someone can initiate a story that so many run with and it becomes fact. Not sure what to believe now.
I am also sorry you were treated so poorly. You reasonably questioned Lady C’a interpretation of the events of that day based on a video clip. I also looked for a clip, and was only able to find the material you included, which did not appear to accurately reflect what Lady C had written. I agree with Lady C’s assertion that Diana wanted to undermine Charles but let’s be honest, the video didn’t support the entirety of Lady C’s narrative. Thank you for sharing what happened. Her response was disrespectful to you and reflects very poorly on Lady C. Please don’t let this sickening turn of events ruin your future reviews. Your work is excellent and greatly appreciated! My life was recently upended and I look forward to hearing your channel for an escape from my own pesky troubles. Lady C rudely interrupted us both! ❤❤❤
I think so differently of this woman now and any of her books, her CZcams channel, interviews etc. She was so unkind and unfair to you when you did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG!! She is the one acting immature in this situation to come at you the way she did and publicly! UNBELIEVABLE and UNPROFESSIONAL and UNFORTUNATE. Sorry for this Cheere you didn’t deserve this!!😢
I also want to say that I have watched Spare Me the Details twice, Revenge three times, thoroughly enjoyed Traitor King (learned alot of history with that one). And loved Trailer Park Parable. I can see that this episode has been very upsetting and it's hard to get past this type of thing but know that your followers love and appreciate what you do and how you do it!!
I saw the footage of that scene. Dianna was pressed to play the piano. It seemed like she really didn't want to...but they did press her. Charles did not seem angry in anyway. You were right to call her on it.
I also thought Princess Diana didn't want to play, because she kew she could not play well. She didn't want to embarrass herself. Prince Charles looked a bit unhappy perhaps he also knew Diana couldn't play that good. She wasn't upstaging him in this instance because he wasn't auditioning to be a cellist 😂His success didn't depend on his ability to play cello.
As a retired educator - and a human being- I’m proud to be on Team Cheere Denise! Having spent very little time viewing LCC’s smarmy, haughty channel,I have now ceremoniously unsubscribed. I know that was not the intent of your video, however, it was the end result for me! You have restored my dwindling faith in our current educational system. I applaud your intellect, your clear articulation and your wit, among many other things-not the least of which are your incredible time management and organizational skills! You have handled this situation with dignity and class. Well done, Cheere Denise! I look forward to enjoying your next endeavor when the time is right for you!! Rest assured, your devoted viewers will be patiently waiting! Take care and enjoy your family and your honorable career! ❤️
Please..."Team Cheere Denise"??? Not to demean CD here, but there is no reason to pick sides. This was a disagreement between Lady C and CD. Why does everyone feel the need to take sides? Both parties have way too much good information to share to throw the baby out with the bath water. CD is within her rights not to finish the book. Enough said. "Team" anybody sounds like the Sussex mob creating more drama to perpetuate this exchange.
I support your decision, and agree with your reasoning on why you won't read anymore of the book. I was enjoying the book very much, but after her attack on you, I will never watch, read or look at anything that Lady C has to say. She cannot stand to be shown to be stretching the truth and she's having a tantrum. Screw her.
Here's my perspective. I've worked in the publishing world and know a bit about copyright. I also know that another small channel - that dealt with similar material by another author -was required by that author or their publisher to remove all their content related to that book. One reason I started watching your channel is that you seemed to have so much content like this - that divulges a great deal of the content and is essentially a "read with me" with opinions and commentary added - that I assumed you'd gotten permission from the copyright holders or had already thoroughly explored your options in respect of copyright. The fact that other authors and publishers haven't come after you before and have even been supportive seems to be down to good will, good luck and appreciation for the publicity. Publishers and authors have a strong case against channels such as yours, that rely so heavily on their content and divulge so much of it. In some cases, the author is fine with it but the publisher is not or vice versa. You've been fortunate so far and have also likely enjoyed some leeway because you are such a small channel. I think for the passage and video in question, if you had read the passage, shown the video and merely commented, "There seems to be some additional perspective added here by the author." or "OK." with raised eyebrows or "I don't know. That video seems a bit different to me," you would have been fine. Once you make assertions of lying, fabrication, attack someone's reputation or assert that one divergence must mean a broad spectrum loss of confidence, and start making a fuss about it, you wander into territory that can get you in (and has gotten you) trouble, especially given the amount of content the copyright holder has been allowing you to utilize. It can help to ask yourself if you would want one lapse on your part to be used to discredit your work or approach in its entirety. Added to this, you have made other unfavorable comments about the author and copyright holder. Just from a common sense point of view, this generally doesn't predispose people to giving a pass, even though they have, up until now. Whenever dealing with the amount of copyrighted material that you do, even though you are using it for commentary purposes and are a small channel, you are doing so only with the permission or goodwill of the copyright holders and that needs to be remembered at all times. If you have reservations or unfavorable opinions related to any copyright holder, it's best to couch them in measured terms, downplay them or, as I've seen on another channel that is somewhat similar but uses much less of the material and only explores books that are out of print to avoid breaching copyright, do extra research and actively explore alternative reasons for any discrepancies. For example, "Now, I've seen the video and I'll show it to you,. It's a bit different from this description. My guess is that there's added colour and some artistic licence taken here based on other information that the author had. I can also see from news reports at the time that her upstaging him was the consensus at the time." Understand that any copyright holder can also change their mind at any time and ask you to remove material that you currently have up. This can also mean that an author, who is supportive, can be overruled by the legal team of a publisher who require it to be removed. Situations can also change and if a contract is signed for film rights or an audiobook with official commentary, that contract may put your treatment of the material out of bounds and you may be asked to remove it at that point. Another way to protect yourself is to quote and refer to the material far less than you do so that you don't divulge so much of the actual content. Note that all channels that include copyrighted material also have similar issues that they need to work around. I know of one channel that examines songs. The creator usually chooses songs and videos he likes and to avoid copyright issues, shows clips of videos that are no longer than about 10-12 seconds and skips bits so that it's impossible for someone to hear the whole song through. There's another channel that analyzes singing and it has to put the video of the song in darkness in the background with technical analysis over top and interrupt the clip often to avoid breaching copyright. Another channel has enormous (but not total) artist and record company support for most of his videos examining songs because he only chooses songs he loves and he goes into fine detail explaining why the song is great. So, these are all things to bear in mind. Love your Diana impression. :)
Very interesting comment! Thank you for this wealth of information. It’s interesting to learn of the necessity for understated ways of questioning an author’s interpretation. I had assumed Cheere had permission to use so much content for publicity purposes and that Campbell was fine with it for that reason. I had just recently found Cheere’s channel and was so much enjoying this book and Cheere’s bringing it to life that I was ready to purchase other books by Campbell. The following are general and rhetorical observations and questions, not necessarily addressed to the poster. (Please note I’m unfamiliar with titles and therefore refer to the author’s last name as in reviews or academic discourse. I intend no disrespect by referring to the author’s last name alone). I can understand an author making contact to object to copyright infringement or respond to the differing interpretation of a scene. My opinion has entirely changed on purchasing more of her books, though, because 1) I understood Campbell to say she uses figures of speech as in atmosphere, etc. (is that perhaps more suggestive of a fictional presentation?) and 2) the (in my opinion) ad hominem attacks in what looked like a frenzied series of public comments. Campbell spoke of Cheere’s youth but rather than extend any charity based upon that youth (imo) deployed the observation with (imo) condescension and condemnation, accusing Cheere in turn of excessive ambition and self-aggrandizement. By pronouncing on motives she can’t possibly know, does not Campbell (perhaps inadvertently) repeat the very methodology under question in the specific scene? Surely, there must be conventional, accepted ways for authors to intervene when perceiving their veracity questioned or copyright infringed. Presumably an author would wish to strengthen the impression of careful weighing of evidence and use of good judgment. In my opinion, Campbell in her replies to Cheere has done the opposite, demonstrating a propensity to leap to conclusions and exercise poor judgment by unleashing ad hominem vitriol repetitively and publicly. IMO Campbell showed herself in her public posts to be an author not at all in command of herself or her evidence. These are my subjective opinions based on the replies Campbell directed to Cheere publicly.
This is great, how you explained the difference between author and publisher regarding copyright. And of reading a passage but then showing the video and perhaps saying, "the news clip seems to show a different perspective." You provide such great examples about use of copyrighted material.
Thank you; I’m aware of all of this which is why I never fought Lady C in her desire for content to be taken down and promptly removed the videos. Her issue was never copyright infringement, rather the exposure of unreliable material in the book. But she made it about copyright infringement to punish me for having an opinion. She can’t sue me for having an opinion, but if she didn’t like how much of her book I shared and wanted to come after me for that, I can certainly understand that perspective. She lost a lot of free publicity and people were buying a 25 year old book of hers to read along so it’s ultimately her loss but if she just didn’t LIKE me and didn’t want me reading her book, that’s her right!
@@anitahood196 This woman is a typical school teacher. I unsubscribed. How bloody dare this crass American who knows absolutely nothing about British aristocracy and the Royal Family call Lady C a Liar....She probably voted for Biden too.
I think that was a misunderstanding of intentions, with the key words being "lie" and then "malicious." I think that Lady C as writer, wishes to publish the truth. Being accused of lying instead of being mistaken perhaps, is probably what upset her. In her turn, she saw this as Cheere Denise being malicious on her channel instead of reaching out privately for clarification. Also, heaven only knows what Lady C. had been told by others. Best wishes to both of you.
@@cheeredenise Very true. I'd say the only person who knew how Charles was feeling, was PC himself. And then he'd have a background of experience with Diana, that others didn't and he'd react based on what he assumed were Diana's motivations. I guess all biographies are going to have their share of subjectivity. In any case, I hope you know that your listeners appreciate you. I think you are straightforward and honest. I think it's the opposite of your character to delight in causing hurt to others. And thank you for letting us express our reactions to this situation. 🙂
In my opinion, Lady C's overraction to your questioning her veracity based on observable evidence, reinforces to me that her veracity needed to be questioned. You are an excellent reviewer. You don't need manufactured drama from questionable sources. Next book, please!
Love and respect to you Cheere - onward and upward… I’m looking forward to your next offering which will be delivered with your unarguable honesty and integrity.
Oh geez I’m so sorry you experienced this!!! What a crazy situation all I kno is I’m glad you shared this with your viewer’s I heard horrible things about that person but this solidifies it I’ll never watch anymore of that persons videos…Your talent in reviewing books is outstanding and I love your channel…I hope you receive peace of mind as you take some time to get past this fiasco…there are so many other books that are far better than whatever this was…chin up you did a great job explaining all of this I hope it doesn’t cause you to rethink your channel because I would miss you❤❤❤
Thanks for your very generous response to these messages. Your observation of the original video and the comparison to the book interpretation was very honest and your response to all this well founded. ❤
If you watch Shauna's review of The Housekeeper's Diary on The Vintage Read yt channel you'll get an eye-opening account of what Diana was really like behind closed doors. Her public persona and private one were two very different things. After listening to Shauna's review, in which she read large portions of it, I had the distinct impression that Harry had married the private version of his mother. I've always loved Diana and didn't want to believe that what Lady C was saying in her videos about her was true, but after hearing The Housekeeper's Diary I have to say Lady C is telling the truth.
She made a UTurn on Meghan & Harry ... And gave a lame explanation why she was practically forced to be positive back then when she kept sucking up to them in her previous book version. I think Rachel Ragland kept using her Diana book as recipe template for her bad behavior ... And that helped her to win a big dumb Harry.
not defending lady C but back in the day we thought meghan was a good addition to the royal family. gradually things went a bit wrong then there was the oprah interview.
Lady C wrote the first H&M book before Oprah. She didn't back track but she went out of her way to be fair to them in her first book. Some of it was sarcasm I believe.
I am Totally with you. I don’t think you need to explain yourself, I had never followed her at all but see her all over the place. She showed herself to me yesterday.
You didn't deserve that Cheere. Take a rest but don't give up. I love your channel and enjoy your book reviews. I've unsubscribed from a certain Lady's channel. Not interested in following it anymore. Keep strong ♥️
Your further comments have been brought to my attention. I have not looked at the entire video and don't have either the time or inclination to do so. For the 6 minutes and 33 seconds that I have endured looking at your self-serving and manipulative comments, you have neglected to point out that my objection was to the defamatory, inflammatory and untrue assertion contained in the title of your video , which you have been wise enough not to repeat. You are obviously clever and talented but also adept at presenting yourself as a victim when you brazenly lie about people and make untrue accusations, patently to increase your following. Your conduct throughout has been dishonourable and I'd suggest you look to your conscience, if you have one. As for your assertion that you didn't have the time to act upon your commitment to remove the defamatory posting, my technical people inform me that you were indeed keeping abreast of the situation and were therefore able to remove it, but failed to do so in as timely a manner as was required. I have treated you throughout with a degree of consideration that you have neither deserved nor reciprocated - I will remind you that you took care to acknowledge how generously I had treated you - and my final word to you, as someone who is old enough to be your mother and maybe even your grandmother, is: You are bright and gifted enough to develop a successful career without resorting to the deviousness, manipulativeness, and ultimate dishonesty which you are displaying as you try to present yourself as my victim when you and I both know that you are the one who lied. It will be interesting to see if you keep this comment posted or if you will display the manipulative skills you have hitherto demonstrated by continuing to flip things.
You can keep degrading my character, but if you can’t be bothered to finish a video before you run with a narrative, I’m afraid it’s not bolstering your credibility as a person who does impeccable research.
@@cheeredeniseAre you one of the Sussex squad? Your comments sound as if they're MM.
Do we, the public, have to politely request Lady c to at least look up the true video of the incident for confirmation who is right or who is wrong. Then FFS put this to bed and prove who is the bigger man on this occasion.
To add to this, if you are so well informed with the Royal family as you yourself have said (HMTLQ had passed ) before the people knew
All I'm asking you to do is ask HRM King Charles if he told the teacher( Diana played piano better than he played chello ) that's all.
@@cheeredeniseif you commit an offence once theres no need to look at anything else.
@@susanmclellan6447we know. That’s why Cheere’s not reading the book anymore and we don’t want to hear from LC either. LC’s an unreliable narrator and keeps showing up in the comments to prove it.
"When someone shows you who they are, believe them"
I haven’t seen many videos because I can’t really understand her accent but she says “sue me” in each one that I have seen. She’s been saying who she is, I certainly believe her now. The cattiness is just beyond anything remotely lady like
Yes! Lady Colin loves to quote Heraclitus' "Character is destiny." Odd, clever, old woman. Bad day. She should have had a martini instead of lashing out at this lovely girl.
Very well said.
@@lizaltieri Yes. In a recent interview she ("Lady C") said, "“It does not behoove us to sully our soul.” But apparently she wasn't listening to herself when she said it.
"THE FIRST TIME"
I believe you handled this with grace, well done Cheere Denise. I still cannot believe Lady C was so scathing over a simple question!
Gosh, what a tossed salad of words on repeat to bully you into a response in her favour.
I'm glad you've stood your ground. This is integrity in action. Cheere, I love being part of your community and will look forward to another book review when your ready.
Wow! Well I applaud your grace in the situation, keep your head high . Love your work!
Deeply unpleasant & ferocious response. Deep breaths & a nice bubble bath tonight, you did not deserve this in any way ❤️💐
I hope this doesn't scare you away from doing other books reviews, I find them all very interesting.
Never! She’s just cranky. Nobody else has ever been offended, NOT EVEN Harry and Meghan and videos about them had enormous views.
@@cheeredenise that's great. And I totally agreed with your course of action. Looking forward to the next book you choose to read!
I was worried the video would end like that. I am really entertained by Cheere, so gosh I hope nothing ever scares her off. She looks tougher than that though. 😊
@@cheeredenise I will miss your Diana voice. That was genius!
@@cheeredenisethank you!!❤❤❤
As a very busy working person, I truly enjoy your book reviews. Your funny voices, the wry commentary & your excellent reading voice, make the reviews most enjoyable. I have great confidence, you are a Gifted School Teacher. Don't let some thin skinned, woke author deter you. You have many new fans Keep up the good work. 👍😊
"Woke"??? 😹🇦🇺
Definitely not woke. But yeah, I agree that Denise is great.
I saw a video where Charles played the cello. Diana was also there and a man asked her to play the piano. The scene was not as Lady C said. I am amazed at her mean and cruel response
They were being good sports during s visit and professional in their conduct. Diana seemed a little embarrassed while playing the piano;?but definitely didn’t do anything to upstage Charles, who good naturedly played a few notes on the cello.
"Lady" C is very childish and mean spirited.
For a older woman she is quite childish getting offended over a reasonable question and answering in a moment of unfounded rage. You were right to not finish it as it is a complete waste of time and I will note to never buy any of her books
I had bought her earlier books. I won't be buying her newest. (Besides you get much of the content for free on all of the CZcams channels she visits.)
And her using Cheere's age as a smack down isn't cool. I imagine her and Meghan may have some parallels.
Yes! This is what I thought too! Good thing Cheere is a teacher and can handle these types!
Ironically, yes. I just wrote almost the same thing. Vengeance is paramount. That bitter anger is creeeeepy, really, particularly given the power differential. Utterly unfitting of a “dignified lady.”
Age obviously doesn't always bring wisdom. I would have expected a far more measured response from Lady C. Disappointing.
I can hear the hurt in your voice.
Carry on doing what you do so well. Keep your integrity.
The hurt is so heartbreakingly understandable. It was undeserved.
Cheere, I hear the hurt in your voice, too.
Do the right thing and stop all the hate, you are leading this lynch mob on Lady C.
@@suzeeq3704 Cheere Denise is a brave lady. Hurting but still keeping us informed. If anyone has mettle, it's she.
@@afquan9211Truly it made us SAD 😢 what a world we live x I tuned off social for days after watching Cheere tell us what happened :(
@@Bindi728 You are very wise. Differing opinions about this matter and who is "right", have gotten heated and personal, with some comments.
As someone else wise pointed out, we are squabbling about a woman--Diana--who died in 1997.
My heart goes out to you, I can hear the hurt in your voice, and I know that feeling. I am so incredibly sorry that anyone has treated you so cruely and unjustly on a global platform. Lady C is certainly no "lady" having degraded herself to the hysterical, irresponsible, knee-jerk shaming of another. For all her 80+ years of acquired knowledge, she is still a gravely damaged malignant narcissist who came from an abusive family of addicts and abusive marriage. None of which has made her KIND. I pray this experience inflicted upon you grounds you deeper in wisdom, kindness, and generosity, and that any future poison barbs of the lickspittle be deflected by your armor of TRUTH. Keep those nasty comments pinned and wear this revelation as a badge of honor!! You have unmasked a master, BRAVO!! 💜
I literally never comment on CZcams videos, but I feel compelled to on this. I absolutely love your channel. Your Harry and Meghan content got me through so many nights of pregnancy insomnia last summer. You made me laugh when all I wanted to do was cry. It’s like I found a kindred spirit. I hope you do not take one person’s criticism of your work too personally, no matter how famous (or perhaps infamous is a better word) the critic may be. Her reaction really says all the world needs to know about her. If she can’t handle a someone questioning her work, maybe she’s the one in the wrong profession.
You're the whole reason i bought her flipping book. We'll listen to anything you read!!!
Me too. I have too much arthritis to read for long, and listening to Cheere is a fun break from audiobooks
As long as she does voices.😂
Was going to buy the book, but not now...
Cheere Denise is a wonderful reader! The voices are uncanny. But also the sense of humor and the asides. Cheere Denise really ADDS to what is on the page. I can understand why authors are thrilled when you read their books. For one thing, you have such a keen interest in people, relationship dynamics, and history.
you can return it 😉
I am totally flabbergasted that expressing an opinion or doubt could stir up such a storm. This could have been handled in a much more civilized and discreet manner. I stand by you and your decision to step away from the mess but also to not be bullied. Keep up the good work. You’re awesome.
Praise in public; criticize in private
Wow, this was awful on Lady C’s part…I have unsubscribed from her channel.
Me too! Never again.
I saw that yesterday! I was surprised that she had such a strong reaction. IMO she should have contacted you privately and without the personal attacks she made. I think you held your own and did the right thing. I understand your POV. Please do keep doing your good work here! I thoroughly enjoy your channel. It's like being in a big book club.
Holy cow! What a stunning over reaction … and horrendous attack. She just keeps bludgeoning you with her “eloquence” … and kept doubling down .. I’m so disappointed in how she handled this. Shows her character! I stand behind your decision!
Totally agree 👏🏼
Exactly. Well said!
So I imagine we’d all like to be seen by a relatively known author. I guess not like this! However, ask yourself why she decided to comment. Did you strike a nerve? Why did she overreact on here, at you, using her own book? You had a legitimate concern! You teach and you didn’t want to expose us to anything but truth! Wow….there is no copyright infringement issue here.
Has she done this before to anyone? Why you? Why would she go after someone now because of an opinion? This is odd to me. We’re all supposed to accept what another person says? You basically fact-checked her and saw something else! Any professional in her field would not be so offended if she thought she was correct. Wouldn’t you dust off someone if you absolutely knew the truth behind a story and they were indeed wrong?
Sorry to hear this, I love the book and I love your reviews. Could this be a bot who may have cloned Lady C's account?
@@Pepper0077 Not allowed to question little old Georgia, she is all knowing.
I'm quite shocked at Lady C's reaction which was totally uncalled for in my opinion. Regardless, your channel is in my top 5 that I check for now posts every day. I will continue to follow and can't wait to see what you choose to read next..there are soooo many to choose from!! We're all behind you 💯%!!!! Gird your loins 😂 love it!!!
I had unsubscribed from Lady C just after Queen Elizabeth II died. She had only just passed and Lady C felt it necessary to reveal that the Queen had died of bone cancer. I was appalled by that. It seemed to me that she was trying to get that info out "first" so that she could be seen as someone who was "in the know". For me and I think many others, the cause of death was irrelevant. We were saddened and didn't care what the Queen's diagnosis had been. Recently, I had been enjoying some of the interviews Lady C had done with other youtubers to promote the release of her updated book. I considered resubscribing to her channel even though I too had difficulty understanding her speech. Never thought to increase the playback speed as another commenter mentioned, lol. After reading the comments she made to you however, I will not be listening to anything she has to say in the future. I really hope you don't take anything she said to heart. Can't wait to hear the next book review! Read on!!
The old bag had been hinting at bone cancer for many months prior to the Queens death....it was easy to pick up on - especially as she kept emphasizing when making comment about 'to her very BONES'.
Lady C said in one of her most recent podcasts that she was made aware of the queens death and was asked by whom I’m not sure to do something with the information as Harry and his wife would maybe do something, I’m assuming publicly.
You made absolutely the right decision and in doing so maintained the high ground. Her loss.
Your integrity, questioning mind and balanced critique make you a joy to watch. Don’t roll in the mud with her.
I absolutely agree with your decision to stay away from her books and remove all videos of her book. She doesn't deserve the promotion of her possible lies and exaggerations.
Don't waist a single second to her. I will still be here when you come back with a new book.
Stay strong and God bless ❤
God bless you too. Really well said from Bonnie Scotland. Ps I love this girls channel. I’m so in awe of her wonderful use of language
Dear Cheere Denise, I was greatly impressed by the measured and wise way that you responded to the outrageous attacks by Lady C. That must have taken great self control, especially under the pressure of work and family demands.
It must be shocking to be attacked like this. It’s so out of the normal realm of experience. And a deeply exhausting strain. So, please know that your questions and concerns were completely appropriate, valid and appreciated. You expressed them respectfully and responsibly.
Your gut instincts have been right all along and that’s always a valuable lesson for ourselves and to pass on one day to our children.
I hope you’ll be able to shake it all off and, with spring soon here, look forward to fresh beginnings for yourself and your family in every good and joyful sense. You’ve surely earned it! I wish you well! 💕🌷💕
Wow, Lady C has done herself a great disservice and exhibited a real lack of restraint. I knew she was capable of spewing vitriol but I thought she would be a lot more measured publicly.
That’s what I find so surprising, too. It’s such a public display of her (in my opinion) being out of control, sending one post on the heels of another. In my opinion, it is not a good look.
@@m.h.6499
She evidently doesn't understand that the majority of people have jobs during the day.
She is definitely a Royal bi... .
I'm surprised at how viscious Lady C's letter is. Unsubscribed from her abput a year ago. Can't take it.
That is exactly what this channel was aiming for, if you see it for what it is 'click bait' then you may have a different perspective. Compare and contrast is a wonderful tool, I suggest you do more reading on Diana by various authors and you will understand a bit more.
I am at a loss for words. I stand by you. I love you and your channel. Do not let this get you upset.
Don't let this get you down. I'll be looking forward to your next book choice!
I'd say, take time to process this. To give vent to all the feelings. To mourn, to scream if you have to, to cry. And then to take care of yourself, Ms. Cheere Denise. And to know that you have so many people who watch and listen to you as if you are a modern day Scheherazade.
@@afquan9211 nicely said. She's done nothing wrong. LC is a bully. I just want cheeredenise to know that I am with her.
Denise...DONT LET IT BOTHER YOU. You are right. She can obviously be very nasty and cruel. You hit a nerve. Sounds like your perspective may well have been correct.❤
I have enjoyed listening to you over the past few months. Your videos on Spare and Revenge were so entertaining and kept me coming back for more. I'm sorry about what has happened. I hope you continue to review books about royals and other interesting topics. Kee up the good work!!
I understand but you are being very hard on yourself. I agree with you I don’t think she was acting like Lady C described in that instance. I appreciate your content and honesty. Thank you !
Lady C knows from OTHERS that prince Charles felt dismissed by Diana! It’s irrelevant what you see in the film. Can you see the difference?
Ouch! Very harsh AND a bit too much of a personal attack. Way over the top and uncalled for. Got your back Cheere, whatever you decide to do ❤
Bless you , Cherry. You are loved and respected so much by me. Thank you.
Shocking because Lady C has said she believes in free speech and also against slander. I unsubscribed from her. Because I too have seen her mean and gossip side and I have ignored it. I’m very happy you shared this.
We love you, Cheere. Do what makes sense to you and we'll support it.
The pomposity of Lady C is amazing. She could have cited her source for the Charles cello incident to you. She didn’t. I’ve written magazine articles and have had no less than three sources for each fact. If anyone had questioned me, I could cite several sources and she couldn’t cite one source? You did right. I can’t stand Lady C anyway. She has the shrill voice of a gossipy fish wife. Let’s move on to a reputable author.
I have followed Lady C for the past few years but your description of her is spot on
You have no you tube history so please send me evidence I would love to read it.
And if the sources are confidential?
That is the main criticism of Lady C. Her books are fun reads but she does not cite sources. The sources are her social contacts and want to remain off the record. So she probably knows a lot that others don’t, but some of it may be gossip.
She made it up, I’m convinced of it now. To come at this young lady like this is outrageous & uncalled for, if she was telling the truth she wouldn’t respond the way she did.
Well handled , you showed Lady C that you are not intimidated by her threats and kept your own dignity. I look forward to whatever book you choose to review next
If I was Lady C I would get this woman for copyright infringement. She actually called her a Liar.
Lady C is a bully. I have unsubscribed her.
Wow, I am at a loss of words here! So sorry about this ordeal. I respect the way in which you have conducted yourself. The respect with which you have treated this lady regardless of the venom dripping off her words directed at you speaks volumes of who you are. Stand strong 🌷. Looking forward to your next book review.
She made it so personal WOW I am so glad you shared this with us. I am her fan but now I must rethink things... I am sitting here stunned
Lady C is always saying she never watches anyone else’s CZcams videos!!
It sounds like Lady C can be just as bad as Meghan Markle. Both of them are Leo star signs.
Good decision. Let it bring you peace of mind.
I support you Cheere ❤ I will be here and I will continue to enjoy wonderful insights. I'm sorry this happened to you. Its unfortunate, but moving on........ God bless you beautiful!
Lady C didn't do herself any favours with this angry and snobbish response.
ARE YOU KIDDING ME . SHE ACCUSED HER OF LYING!
I agree. I unsubed.
You are 100% in the right Cheere. I will not listen to or read anything from Lady C. Again.
So it is fine for you that this ner do well , who knows nothing about British aristocracy attacks the integrity of the author of the persons book she is reading to profit by calling her a LIAR. I hope lady C has her buried in copyright and she is taken down.
"Ner do well.".🙄. Do you even know the meanings of the words you type, Tabitha?
I think you are an exceptional book reviewer
I’m so done with “Lady” C. I’ve never really liked her and have a difficult time understanding her when she talks. Now I wonder how much she really knows.
I think she’s in debt to certain factions who provide her with intel, so we always have to consider the source
Is it just me or does she seem kind of creepy?
If I watch her...ii speed up the video. I hate her pompous voice
The only way to understand her is to put her on 1.25x speed. I'm not saying she lied about what happened in this particular part of her book, but she definatly overreacted, and it's odd because if she's telling the truth she shouldn't react that way at all.
She is very pedantic when it comes to language which does make her hard to understand at times, both in writing and speaking. According to her book "Daughter of Narcissist, she and her mother would compete in vocabulary and who can come up with the most new words. I especially dislike when she throws in french words that make the entire sentence a mystery. Since I don't speak french I can't look the word up because I don't know how to spell it! 🤣🤣
I appreciate your thoughtful and measured response to this unwarranted attack by Lady C. I hope it’s some consolation that your instincts regarding her work proved to be true. Your decision to remove all your videos about her book except for the one in question was the correct choice, in my view. I admire your honesty, integrity, and courage. It can’t have been easy to stand your ground but that is what needs to be done with bullies.
Please enjoy a break to clear your head and lighten your heart. I look forward to following along with your next book selection. 🙏🌸
Let it go, Cheer! I love your questioning of all authors you read! I’m a teacher in Texas and you are an inspiration to me. For 31 years, I have taught that we should always question everything we read. I can’t imagine dealing with this at school! Jeez! Love your work! Trust your gut, girl!
Bravo Cheere! Lady C attempted to "degrade" you and has obviously not succeeded. Thank you for your openness and integrity.
Lady C has two sides. When she is being adored she positively preens, she doesn’t like being questioned. Red flag methinks.
Absolutely. Indeed.
Narc me thinks
Well said! I've seen it all along but OMG, this situation really illustrated this. It's too bad b/c I was enjoying the book review
Me thinks the lady protests too much. 😅😂 That is what one of her fans said to me in the comments when I tried to explain my questioning about her video. It didn't add up. This didn't matter because I was supposed to take note and never question Lady C . I blocked them that way they can't see me and most importantly I don't see me . 😅
Without a doubt! She went for the juggler with the intention of ripping Cheere apart! And wouldn’t stop! A few sentences would have sufficed but apparently her rage was not that easily quelled.
“I have no wish to embarrass you, but here’s three pages of me doing everything in my power to embarrass you.”
The irony!!!
It's ridiculous . It shows her dry personality . My personal opinion is that you struck a nerve , and Lady C did lie .
@@cheeredenise. Ok for you to embarrass her but perish the thought she does so to you. You called her a liar.
@@desertsunset8025. Actually she didn’t. I am an Aussie woman, 76, who was there when this happened in real time as it happened, not an edited video. Lady C was correct.
@@lynw.6140 There is always someone out there who knows! Thank you for setting the record straight.
Hang in there girl - you are the BEST book reviewer I know - chin up, all will be well. We will wait until you are ready to bring us the next book xxxx
Sorry you had to deal with that. You are the definition of grace under fire. Have a great weekend.
Cheere, thank you for standing your ground against such a vicious person. I continue to admire your honesty, graciousness, and poise in the face of such an attack. I agree wholeheartedly with your decision to drop this “Lady” from any further discussion on your wonderful channel. I and many others wish you well and look forward to your next fascinating read! 🙏🏻❤️🙏🏻
Thankyou for reading this book. You are a very bright lady and it's a shame that this has happened. I love your honesty and adherence to your values. Your Mother and Father and families are so fortunate to have you in their lives! You have highlighted Lady C's motive!
You respectfully questioned one thing--one--and she hits the roof. Unbelievable (and thin-skinned, absolutely). Interesting, how someone so fond of calling out Meghan Markle for being a bully turns out to be one herself. You did not deserve that tirade. I'm sorry you had to endure that.
I'm not sure it was respectfully questioned. And I do disagree with Cheere's interpretation of that video. I agree with Lady C's interpretation. Besides, it wasn't just her interpretation, it was the story of the day back when it happened.
Sugar in your tea?
@@Anna_Key You are correct. It was NOT respectfully questioned. The original title was "This is a Huge Lie". In the video itself, she repeats that it is a "a glaring lie". Then she asks us if this means that maybe everything that Lady C wrote is a lie. And then she puts up this poor me video claiming that all she did was ask a simple question.
@valgardener7656. Yes, I witnessed that the original video was titled "This is a huge lie" along side 3 alarms. Cheere put the video in "private" long enough to edit the title to try and hoodwink the viewers. Very sneeky to say the least.
I'm coming from a place of being a fan from the early days, when CD reviewed Spare and later on I shed a tear with Cheere when she opened up about her mother. I actually shed a tear!
The scales have fallen from my eyes now!
CD has been incredibly rude, sarcastic, dismissive and patronising in the comments. If the alarm bells weren't ringing loud enough 10 days ago, they certainly are now.
A mask seems to have dropped and she is jumping all over it. I'm not taken in by it anymore. Did you see the look to camera after she quoted LC talking about her education? Tongue jut and pure teenage fury.
@@Lilyannshaw I sussed her a minute or two into the video, but in my defence I have years of training to watch out for the slightest muscle movement in the face. Joyous to be able to unmask a masquerade very early on, saves years of wasting your energy on a fraud! (which I have also been guilty of!)
I support you entirely and think you've made the right decision. You did not deserve that. You are fantastic at what you do, and I love your channel, its like listening to a friend. Take all the time you need and I'm sure we will all be looking forward to finding out what book you choose to share with us next. Sending a hug from the UK x
Completely respect and understand your decision. Keep your held held high, you didn't do anything wrong. ❤❤ onwards and upwards, we will be watching.
Cheere, Please don't give Lady C another thought. Clearly she is just a bitter old woman (and I say that as someone who is not too far behind her in age). She truly thinks way too highly of herself and I consider anything but a lady.
She definitely came out VERY poorly. It’s hard to believe that she is comfortable to be so spiteful in public comments.
I can’t wait to hear your next book!!
If this is how she behaves publicly, can you imagine what she must be like in private?
Oh honey, I’m so sorry this happened. Lady C really jumped the shark by attacking your character. Nobody deserves to be publicly humiliated in such a manner. Please take all the time you need to collect yourself before coming back on. Take care and God bless.
Attempted public humiliation. She really only embarassed herself with her reaction.
@laurasalo6160 Exactly. She came off so bad I had to unfollow. And as usual it takes her forever to get to the point.
@@laurasalo6160 was just about to say that myself. for someone to whom class and manners are so central to her brand, she really shoot herself in the foot. she really seems like piece of work. i as well, like many, always felt a bit off about Lady C, but often ended up watching this or that. now she helped me put the finger on it 😊 i dont think i will waste my time anymore on her bad juju. kudos to you, cheere, for standing your ground!
Wonderfully said. ❤ yes.
So sweet🩷
Good grief. The punishment doesn't fit the "crime." Her attack on you is like calling in the swat team because she got bit by an ant. She's challenging YOUR integrity? You showed what true integrity is, and choosing to move away from this toxic situation is commendable. I am no longer interested in anything she has to say. Her comments to you are uncalled for. Snarky and bullying. I stand with you.
Hear, hear! I second this entirely!!
I have to agree that questioning Cheerie’s integrity is just ridiculous especially since C. did all this work and took it down just so she can be sure she isn’t spreading falsehoods!
I’m new to your channel and I enjoy your content. I hardly ever comment to a creator but I really had to this time. I applaud you for not cowering when someone with more “recognition” came after you and tried to bully you and intimidate you. I also saw the difference between what was written in the book and what the actual video recording displayed and I agreed with you - the book didn’t portray the event the way someone viewing it would have; it wasn’t this terrible behavior by Diana to upstage Charles at all. Well --- I guess recollections do vary!!
Can’t wait to see what book you choose next to review on your channel. Stay strong.
Very well said! Many times I’ve felt that Lady C was being callous and cruel but I chose to overlook it because she seemed to have juicy insider gossip. That’s on me. I ought to have taken a more principled stand and boycotted her channel the first time this became clear to me.
But this OTT response to Cheere is unconscionable. I’ve unsubscribed from Lady C’s channel and cancelled my preorder for her recent book. Lady C has shown her true colours. In my opinion (emphasis for legal reasons), Lady C is a mean girl and a bully. She has proven herself to be unworthy of my further time and attention.
@@amiek9226Same.
Once I saw Lady C on "I'm a celebrity, get me out of here", I understood what type of person she really is.
I absolutely loved your coverage of Traitor King btw - I had just read it, and was so happy you chose it, and basically voiced what I had thought of it
Keep up the great work! 🙂
I posted this message on the previous video and just finished watching this one. So I just wanted to reiterate what I previously posted. Hang in there! ❤
This is exactly why I unsubscribed from @LadyColinCampbellCZcams channel! She is mean and a bully!!! Those messages were written by a spiteful and vengeful person.
My Cheere, I can tell your feelings were hurt and it’s okay to be hurt but you are better than her! You are a TEACHER that’s helping young people to be something in life and that takes a special kind of person!
You are not a gossiper repeating second hand stories like her. What a sad old woman with no purpose or legacy but to sit on a couch gossiping with her dogs! The video you showed told the truth and I believe you. You did nothing wrong.
My friend, teachers are in the same class as doctors, nurses, firefighters, police officers, etc. you all are special and courageous people! Brush off those tears and vile person. On Monday morning, hold your head up and strut like Naomi Campbell down your hallway into your classroom, to the lunchroom, to the teachers lounge, and then to your car! We got you Cheere! Blessings.
The hyperbole and histrionics, in her reaction, seems to suggest that you were right about her book being, questionably, full of hyperbole and histrionics ... oh the blessed irony of it all.
🎯 🎯 Your comment says it all!!
So sorry for what has happened. I hope you will keep reviewing books. You are such a strong person. Well done for standing up for your morals.
I wonder if Lady C drinks, because those notes to you are craaazy!
The thought crosses one’s mind….
omg, that could explain a lot. I find myself searching for any insight on how a professional author could possibly have (in my opinion) spewed vitriol uncontrollably all over a public page. That series of posts one right after the other in my opinion suggested someone utterly out of control. Why would she purposefully undermine the public presentation of her good judgment and her self-professed “balanced” treatment of her topics? (quoted from her earlier videos in which she discusses her “balanced” treatment of topics).
Hadn’t thought of the possibility before.
Something caused that...
She used to be quite enjoyable to watch, but just in the past couple of years or so has become boring & repetitive. (Imo)😊
Yes, a very hysterical word salad. Imo.
Maybe some form of cognitive degeneration? A dear friend's mom suffered from this, and her extreme rages were shocking! She'd been a lovely, humorous woman until the illness progressed. Just speculating here, nothing more.
Lady C has also had her description of Meghan's bump slip questioned, as the photo of the purported bump slip wasn't taken where she claimed it was. I think it was TRG who pointed out the error. So she must be smarting over that as well.
Yes I saw that podcast from Grift and it’s the first time anyone has pointed out the different background
when the bump was supposed to have slipped after exiting that building. Shows how someone can initiate a story that so many run with and it becomes fact. Not sure what to believe now.
Utterly disgraceful behaviour from Lady C. So sorry that happened to you. Support you 100% ❤❤
I am also sorry you were treated so poorly. You reasonably questioned Lady C’a interpretation of the events of that day based on a video clip. I also looked for a clip, and was only able to find the material you included, which did not appear to accurately reflect what Lady C had written. I agree with Lady C’s assertion that Diana wanted to undermine Charles but let’s be honest, the video didn’t support the entirety of Lady C’s narrative. Thank you for sharing what happened. Her response was disrespectful to you and reflects very poorly on Lady C. Please don’t let this sickening turn of events ruin your future reviews. Your work is excellent and greatly appreciated! My life was recently upended and I look forward to hearing your channel for an escape from my own pesky troubles. Lady C rudely interrupted us both! ❤❤❤
I think so differently of this woman now and any of her books, her CZcams channel, interviews etc. She was so unkind and unfair to you when you did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG!! She is the one acting immature in this situation to come at you the way she did and publicly! UNBELIEVABLE and UNPROFESSIONAL and UNFORTUNATE. Sorry for this Cheere you didn’t deserve this!!😢
I also want to say that I have watched Spare Me the Details twice, Revenge three times, thoroughly enjoyed Traitor King (learned alot of history with that one). And loved Trailer Park Parable. I can see that this episode has been very upsetting and it's hard to get past this type of thing but know that your followers love and appreciate what you do and how you do it!!
I think you handled the whole situation with a great deal of class. I stand by your decision and look forward to all of your future content.
I saw the footage of that scene. Dianna was pressed to play the piano. It seemed like she really didn't want to...but they did press her. Charles did not seem angry in anyway. You were right to call her on it.
Lady C needs to chill out!
Actually, as Diana is rushing out of the room Charles touches her arm which looks to me like a gentle, supportive gesture.
I also thought Princess Diana didn't want to play, because she kew she could not play well. She didn't want to embarrass herself. Prince Charles looked a bit unhappy perhaps he also knew Diana couldn't play that good. She wasn't upstaging him in this instance because he wasn't auditioning to be a cellist 😂His success didn't depend on his ability to play cello.
Jeez, Cheere, I'm sorry. I'd be upset too. Thanks for letting us all know 🙂
As a retired educator - and a human being- I’m proud to be on Team Cheere Denise! Having spent very little time viewing LCC’s smarmy, haughty channel,I have now ceremoniously unsubscribed. I know that was not the intent of your video, however, it was the end result for me! You have restored my dwindling faith in our current educational system. I applaud your intellect, your clear articulation and your wit, among many other things-not the least of which are your incredible time management and organizational skills! You have handled this situation with dignity and class. Well done, Cheere Denise! I look forward to enjoying your next endeavor when the time is right for you!! Rest assured, your devoted viewers will be patiently waiting! Take care and enjoy your family and your honorable career! ❤️
Such a thoughtful comment!! Thank you!
Please..."Team Cheere Denise"??? Not to demean CD here, but there is no reason to pick sides. This was a disagreement between Lady C and CD. Why does everyone feel the need to take sides? Both parties have way too much good information to share to throw the baby out with the bath water. CD is within her rights not to finish the book. Enough said. "Team" anybody sounds like the Sussex mob creating more drama to perpetuate this exchange.
This saga has confirmed my feeling that Lady C is not impartial or balanced and could even be considered vitriolic herself 😖
I support your decision, and agree with your reasoning on why you won't read anymore of the book. I was enjoying the book very much, but after her attack on you, I will never watch, read or look at anything that Lady C has to say. She cannot stand to be shown to be stretching the truth and she's having a tantrum. Screw her.
Oh Cheere I am so sorry she attacked you. You standing by your principles is admirable.💖 She has attacked you personally, that is just unacceptable.
Lady C has made a huge mistake in showing such an ugly side to her in. Very disappointed with the unnecessary aggression and bullying.
Here's my perspective. I've worked in the publishing world and know a bit about copyright. I also know that another small channel - that dealt with similar material by another author -was required by that author or their publisher to remove all their content related to that book.
One reason I started watching your channel is that you seemed to have so much content like this - that divulges a great deal of the content and is essentially a "read with me" with opinions and commentary added - that I assumed you'd gotten permission from the copyright holders or had already thoroughly explored your options in respect of copyright. The fact that other authors and publishers haven't come after you before and have even been supportive seems to be down to good will, good luck and appreciation for the publicity. Publishers and authors have a strong case against channels such as yours, that rely so heavily on their content and divulge so much of it. In some cases, the author is fine with it but the publisher is not or vice versa. You've been fortunate so far and have also likely enjoyed some leeway because you are such a small channel.
I think for the passage and video in question, if you had read the passage, shown the video and merely commented, "There seems to be some additional perspective added here by the author." or "OK." with raised eyebrows or "I don't know. That video seems a bit different to me," you would have been fine. Once you make assertions of lying, fabrication, attack someone's reputation or assert that one divergence must mean a broad spectrum loss of confidence, and start making a fuss about it, you wander into territory that can get you in (and has gotten you) trouble, especially given the amount of content the copyright holder has been allowing you to utilize. It can help to ask yourself if you would want one lapse on your part to be used to discredit your work or approach in its entirety. Added to this, you have made other unfavorable comments about the author and copyright holder. Just from a common sense point of view, this generally doesn't predispose people to giving a pass, even though they have, up until now.
Whenever dealing with the amount of copyrighted material that you do, even though you are using it for commentary purposes and are a small channel, you are doing so only with the permission or goodwill of the copyright holders and that needs to be remembered at all times.
If you have reservations or unfavorable opinions related to any copyright holder, it's best to couch them in measured terms, downplay them or, as I've seen on another channel that is somewhat similar but uses much less of the material and only explores books that are out of print to avoid breaching copyright, do extra research and actively explore alternative reasons for any discrepancies. For example, "Now, I've seen the video and I'll show it to you,. It's a bit different from this description. My guess is that there's added colour and some artistic licence taken here based on other information that the author had. I can also see from news reports at the time that her upstaging him was the consensus at the time."
Understand that any copyright holder can also change their mind at any time and ask you to remove material that you currently have up. This can also mean that an author, who is supportive, can be overruled by the legal team of a publisher who require it to be removed. Situations can also change and if a contract is signed for film rights or an audiobook with official commentary, that contract may put your treatment of the material out of bounds and you may be asked to remove it at that point.
Another way to protect yourself is to quote and refer to the material far less than you do so that you don't divulge so much of the actual content.
Note that all channels that include copyrighted material also have similar issues that they need to work around. I know of one channel that examines songs. The creator usually chooses songs and videos he likes and to avoid copyright issues, shows clips of videos that are no longer than about 10-12 seconds and skips bits so that it's impossible for someone to hear the whole song through. There's another channel that analyzes singing and it has to put the video of the song in darkness in the background with technical analysis over top and interrupt the clip often to avoid breaching copyright. Another channel has enormous (but not total) artist and record company support for most of his videos examining songs because he only chooses songs he loves and he goes into fine detail explaining why the song is great.
So, these are all things to bear in mind.
Love your Diana impression. :)
Brilliant comment 🥂
Very interesting comment! Thank you for this wealth of information. It’s interesting to learn of the necessity for understated ways of questioning an author’s interpretation.
I had assumed Cheere had permission to use so much content for publicity purposes and that Campbell was fine with it for that reason. I had just recently found Cheere’s channel and was so much enjoying this book and Cheere’s bringing it to life that I was ready to purchase other books by Campbell.
The following are general and rhetorical observations and questions, not necessarily addressed to the poster. (Please note I’m unfamiliar with titles and therefore refer to the author’s last name as in reviews or academic discourse. I intend no disrespect by referring to the author’s last name alone).
I can understand an author making contact to object to copyright infringement or respond to the differing interpretation of a scene. My opinion has entirely changed on purchasing more of her books, though, because 1) I understood Campbell to say she uses figures of speech as in atmosphere, etc. (is that perhaps more suggestive of a fictional presentation?) and 2) the (in my opinion) ad hominem attacks in what looked like a frenzied series of public comments. Campbell spoke of Cheere’s youth but rather than extend any charity based upon that youth (imo) deployed the observation with (imo) condescension and condemnation, accusing Cheere in turn of excessive ambition and self-aggrandizement. By pronouncing on motives she can’t possibly know, does not Campbell (perhaps inadvertently) repeat the very methodology under question in the specific scene?
Surely, there must be conventional, accepted ways for authors to intervene when perceiving their veracity questioned or copyright infringed. Presumably an author would wish to strengthen the impression of careful weighing of evidence and use of good judgment.
In my opinion, Campbell in her replies to Cheere has done the opposite, demonstrating a propensity to leap to conclusions and exercise poor judgment by unleashing ad hominem vitriol repetitively and publicly. IMO Campbell showed herself in her public posts to be an author not at all in command of herself or her evidence.
These are my subjective opinions based on the replies Campbell directed to Cheere publicly.
This is great, how you explained the difference between author and publisher regarding copyright. And of reading a passage but then showing the video and perhaps saying, "the news clip seems to show a different perspective." You provide such great examples about use of copyrighted material.
@@m.h.6499
Excellent questions. I hope a reply is forthcoming.
Thank you; I’m aware of all of this which is why I never fought Lady C in her desire for content to be taken down and promptly removed the videos. Her issue was never copyright infringement, rather the exposure of unreliable material in the book. But she made it about copyright infringement to punish me for having an opinion. She can’t sue me for having an opinion, but if she didn’t like how much of her book I shared and wanted to come after me for that, I can certainly understand that perspective. She lost a lot of free publicity and people were buying a 25 year old book of hers to read along so it’s ultimately her loss but if she just didn’t LIKE me and didn’t want me reading her book, that’s her right!
She came for you, didn't she? Oh well. I'm on your side.
Absolutely! This makes me so very angry for my favorite "reader" AKA Cheere Denise.
Me too
Well Cheere said Lady C was a liar.
@@anitahood196. Exactly.
@@anitahood196 This woman is a typical school teacher. I unsubscribed. How bloody dare this crass American who knows absolutely nothing about British aristocracy and the Royal Family call Lady C a Liar....She probably voted for Biden too.
From what I've seen of her, Lady C strikes me as a pompous lover of the sound of her own voice.
Indeed!
Lady C is the best!
"The best" what?
@@livhemingway2224😅😂🤣😆
That's why I've never watched one of her videos -- they go on for hours and she doesn't actually say anything.
I think that was a misunderstanding of intentions, with the key words being "lie" and then "malicious." I think that Lady C as writer, wishes to publish the truth. Being accused of lying instead of being mistaken perhaps, is probably what upset her. In her turn, she saw this as Cheere Denise being malicious on her channel instead of reaching out privately for clarification. Also, heaven only knows what Lady C. had been told by others.
Best wishes to both of you.
Probably a great way to learn not to jump on second hand info from “sources” because sometimes your sources didn’t get it right.
@@cheeredenise Very true. I'd say the only person who knew how Charles was feeling, was PC himself. And then he'd have a background of experience with Diana, that others didn't and he'd react based on what he assumed were Diana's motivations. I guess all biographies are going to have their share of subjectivity.
In any case, I hope you know that your listeners appreciate you. I think you are straightforward and honest. I think it's the opposite of your character to delight in causing hurt to others.
And thank you for letting us express our reactions to this situation. 🙂
@@cheeredenise Says the woman who made a public accusation of lying based on a highly suspect source that she knew to be edited and flawed.
You have integrity. I think you hit a nerve, hence such a strong reaction.
In my opinion, Lady C's overraction to your questioning her veracity based on observable evidence, reinforces to me that her veracity needed to be questioned.
You are an excellent reviewer. You don't need manufactured drama from questionable sources. Next book, please!
Looks like Lady C really needs a nap.
😂
She must be off her meds 😊
Shamed herself and lost her dignity on the way for the nap
Maybe she should have more coke 😉
Love and respect to you Cheere - onward and upward… I’m looking forward to your next offering which will be delivered with your unarguable honesty and integrity.
Oh geez I’m so sorry you experienced this!!! What a crazy situation all I kno is I’m glad you shared this with your viewer’s I heard horrible things about that person but this solidifies it I’ll never watch anymore of that persons videos…Your talent in reviewing books is outstanding and I love your channel…I hope you receive peace of mind as you
take some time to get past this fiasco…there are so many other books that are far better than whatever this was…chin up you did a great job explaining all of this I hope it doesn’t cause you to rethink your channel because I would miss you❤❤❤
Lady C has shown her true colours.
Wow…😮
I am sitting here gobsmacked… I have a lot of faith & respect for you both & I hate this happened.
So what book are we gonna do Cheere? 🎉🎉🎉 😊
Cheere Denise I'm so sorry that you had to deal with this. She was nasty and that was uncalled for. You deserve better.
Thanks for your very generous response to these messages. Your observation of the original video and the comparison to the book interpretation was very honest and your response to all this well founded. ❤
Cheere, you are a person of integrity and I appreciate it. Thank you.
I really admire what a elegant intelligent young lady you are. Keep strong and true to yourself x
This is horrible,demeaning and hurtful.I'm so sorry..Here for you always, wonderful human
If you watch Shauna's review of The Housekeeper's Diary on The Vintage Read yt channel you'll get an eye-opening account of what Diana was really like behind closed doors. Her public persona and private one were two very different things. After listening to Shauna's review, in which she read large portions of it, I had the distinct impression that Harry had married the private version of his mother. I've always loved Diana and didn't want to believe that what Lady C was saying in her videos about her was true, but after hearing The Housekeeper's Diary I have to say Lady C is telling the truth.
She made a UTurn on Meghan & Harry ... And gave a lame explanation why she was practically forced to be positive back then when she kept sucking up to them in her previous book version.
I think Rachel Ragland kept using her Diana book as recipe template for her bad behavior ... And that helped her to win a big dumb Harry.
Absolutely!!
Little did Ragland know it was all hyperbolic content.
not defending lady C but back in the day we thought meghan was a good addition to the royal family. gradually things went a bit wrong then there was the oprah interview.
Lady C wrote the first H&M book before Oprah. She didn't back track but she went out of her way to be fair to them in her first book. Some of it was sarcasm I believe.
A big, dumb, Harry what?
I am Totally with you. I don’t think you need to explain yourself, I had never followed her at all but see her all over the place. She showed herself to me yesterday.
You didn't deserve that Cheere. Take a rest but don't give up. I love your channel and enjoy your book reviews. I've unsubscribed from a certain Lady's channel. Not interested in following it anymore.
Keep strong ♥️