watching Chip n Dale Rescue Rangers, so you don't have to
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 05. 2022
- 💀WATCH US REACT LIVE💀
/ spillingthemilk
🔑SUPPORT US ON PATREON🔑
/ spillingthemilk
☀️BECOME A CHANNEL MEMBER☀️
/ @spillingthemilk
🔥FULL SERIES PLAYLIST🔥
bruh they ain't making a sequel
📲FOLLOW US ON TWITTER📲
/ spillingmilktv
/ jackisboy
/ korishere
/ korewaeden_
📞JOIN THE DISCORD📞
/ discord
📷FOLLOW OUR IG & TIKTOK📷
/ spillingthemilkboys
/ spillingthemilkreal
🎬EDITING🎬
/ giyehanime
Chip n Dale Rescue Rangers is a new film from Disney plus or Disney+ whatever it is. A film starring John Mulaney and Andy Sandberg about reboots, revivals, and overall bad film practises. This film is terrible and bad in every aspect full of stupid references like ugly sonic the hedgehog, phineas and ferb, trying to appeal to internet humour but failing in every way. Today on Spilling The Milk the boys watch and react to this awful movie. kinda like watching Chip n Dale Rescue Rangers, so you don't have to. Chip and dale
#ChipnDale #RescueRangers #Movie - Zábava
What suprises me is that Disney actually DOESN'T own half the IPs in this movie. The amount of copyright paperwork they must have went through probably collapsed into a black hole.
Yeah
Under parody law
It’s a billion dollar industry with a near monopoly in the entertainment industry. Also monopoly over the average person’s nostalgia. I bet you they could pull a few favors or twist a few arms.
@@glitterzoid2421 now that's fucking convenient
@@zachanikwano the other companies can always refuse
The funny thing is that this movie in its original draft was supposed to have Pluto as the main antagonist, which makes sense considering his history with them in the classic shorts
They should have kept that
What history
@@Pukeprincess Would've been less horrible than using the backstory of the child actor they sent out to die as villain fodder
@@Quackervoltz exactly
@@Quackervoltz Pluto is usually the antagonist-figure in the Chip & Dale shorts, outside of Rescue Rangers. But of course Disney can't sully the reputation of their marketable dog character
The only thing that really bugs me is what they did to Bobby Discroll when introducing Peter Pan as the main villain. The fact that they made his backstory identical to the real life kid who played Peter Pan in the 1953 movie is tasteless. Disney threw Bobby Driscoll to the curb, and he ended up dying on the streets. And now, 50 years later, it's being used as a joke in a Disney movie. Apparently his actual worth meant nothing to them, but his story did. Real classy Disney.
IIRC it took people at least two years to find his body and he was buried in an unmarked grave
Disney has a history of treating their VAs like shit. Take Snow White's VA, Adriana Caselotti, who Walt directly refused to give her credit for her role in fear of breaking the illusion of the character. Went as far as to pretty much blacklister from any notable roles and leave her with multiple smaller jobs, which once more would end up uncredited. Only at the age of 75 did Dinsey have her come back to record a song for an attraction, only then was she given any public recognition. Only to pass away 5 years later due to her lung cancer.
That’s funny in a dark way.
Really?! That’s Horrible…
Yeah I higly doubt these writers knew about that
Disney 50 years later: “Hey Bobby, just wanted to let you know that we’re gonna be using the story of when we kicked you to the curb for getting old as the backstory for the villain in one of our new movies, who is also the most well known character you’ve ever played. Is that alright?”
Bobby Discroll: **Literally lying in his grave**
Disney: “Awesome! Thanks Bobby!”
That’s literally what they did
that comment is extremely $)(@%$# up! what ru doing with your life?
I don't think that was intentional. It's a story that's used for a lot of stuff.
@@pundertalefan4391 It’s still disrespectful at the very least
This movie literally brought Sonic's character arc full circle
Really don’t like the übercrossover direction most media seems to be striving for, but I kinda admire what they did with Ugly Sonic tbh. He went from a meme to a tragic goofball who tries to embrace his meme status and I’m digging it.
Any version of Sonic being this self-aware is ludicrously in-character.
Though let's be honest here, they focus on him as the joke for way to long..
@@RaptorRockDrakeJesus Agree. He was cool as a one-off character, but tying him to the plot as a whole dampened the joke.
Man movies suck nowadays... makes me feel old
They where really audacious to call out Ugly Sonic when their own character designs are equally crass and nightmare fueling.
Spoilers
Ugly Sonic being the hero at the end was bigger than any plot twist this movie gave out imo
Why did you spoil it for me
@@angelc3500 can you not read the first word “SPOILERS”
So?
If you look up what really happened to Peter Pan's voice actor Bobby Driscoll, tmu, it makes the "Peter Pan as the main villain" thing even darker.
That said, I've joked about something "assaulting my childhood" before but *man* that movie looks like it was trying to strip-mine an entire generation for nostalgia cash.
>strip-mine an entire generation for nostalgia cash
That's pretty much a business model nowadays, my guy. Welcome to hyper-capitalism, enjoy your stay for as long as it's got left to live.
@@mirceazaharia2094do not make anything new or they will find you and buy you and turn it into a Disney remake
I don't think it was intended.
It's pretty messed up with what Disney did to Peter Pan considering what happened to the actor that played him in the original.
Wow I didn’t even know about that
Bobby Discroll.
I don't think that was intentional.
@@pundertalefan4391You are rather naive then.
Dobby as a Gucci model is insane and awesome. Someone was tripping on the best drugs when they imagined this ultra-crossover Hollywood.
Even watching every Chip and Dale rescue rangers episode isn't enough to understand whatever this movie is.
its not hard to understand whatsoever
I don't think film makers wanted us to understand anything.\
That is why i watch anime the target audience gets smaller and smaller and reviewers just praise it for being soo good when it wasn't
@@EpicFableBean Oh yeah, I agree with you; I'm just pointing out how the movie and shows are nothing alike. It's not necessarily a bad thing. They are both just too different.
Things happened.
The one thing i liked most about the new Chip n' Dale film is the insane amount of character cameos that they did in the movie, seeing all of these Disney and non-Disney characters interacting in a weird yet fascinating animated/live action world was a real treat!
Me too
@@CyberKnightProbably AGREED I WATCHED THAT SH*T ON VHS
@@CyberKnightProbably I've watched Who Framed Roger Rabbit before.
WHY ARE U EVERYWHERE
@@CyberKnightProbably unpopular opinion but i don't like roger rabbit it's okay ig
I feel like from what I've seen of this movie the ONLY positive thing was it has SO MANY references even not owned by Disney... and some rare people who really liked the surreal and uncomfortable parts including the animation...
but it really seems awkward and considering the villian being based on the original actor for Peter pan's voice who they canned and completely cut out who became addicted to drugs and died tragically??? but they play it like he's a through and through sleaze ball?
Ngl this is a movie I just like for the animation and references. This is the animation equivalent of cheesy 80s nonstop action movies like anything with Arnold Schwarzenegger.
cause you shoudl seperate the actor from the character? Jesus christ people
@@EpicFableBean agreed
@@EpicFableBean you’re right and If they did care about Bobby Driscoll, they would talking about Bobby’s story years before this movie was even released...
@@EpicFableBean Kinda hard when the actor and the character have THE EXACT SAME BACKSTORY
The whole "I got shot, but the metal keepsake I have in my pocket protected me" schtick doesn't work when the bullet is the size of a boulder. The force alone would've pulverized him.
Ya know what? That would have been a lot more funny
Cartoon logic.
Ah yes, the movie that pissed off a literal cult because the character people saw as either a kid or a pet married their symbol of purity and had a crapton of kids. Also the one that redeemed Ugly Sonic.
don't forgot that one child star
and it only got worse when they found out who voiced the father... I mean - Zipper
@@CyberKnightProbably I think like roger rabbit, this movie is like a celebration of how far animation has come and it doesn’t even only include disney animation but also non Disney animation which I really respect. Yea it’ll have a lot of cameos but that’s what you expect and they really put in the effort to integrate so many different styles of animation into one movie. I think it was a pretty damn good movie and definitely think this one was a better attempt at crossover animation than space jam 2 for sure
@@heronok240 nah it's a shameless cash grab, a cool idea but clearly not understanding of why Roger rabbit was such a good movie. Roger Rabbit from 1988 has better 2d integration than this movie from 2022.
Can we go back to the whole cult part?
17:50 When you pause here, I realize how many distorted characters I missed, and I’m kinda glad I did, cause Phineas looks horrifying!!! Patrick is there too. And honestly, I prefer Paper Jam Dipper over whatever this Dipper is supposed to be.
The samurai cat really gets me the most. It’s like a cross between John Blacksad and Samurai Jack.
@@jessdidonato183 ...I'd watch that show.
I'm so glad I wasn't the only one who noticed Dipper there, I thought all the cameos had driven me absolutely insane to the point where I was seeing characters I liked in an attemot to make sense of what was happening
what makes this different from space jam 2 is that a lot of the cameo characters actually do something or talk rather than just pop in a frame and dip
It also doesn't look like bad cosplay and while the 2d-3d model thing is off it doesn't effect the background characters since it's really chip and dale your staring at most of the time. However, at least it's not just all downright lazy, colors off, etc, like "space jam: a failed legacy." And the only "ego stroking' is really just Disney not making fun of themselves as much as they do others, unlike the "king james" absolute garbage pile. I'm still mixed on this film tbh, but it's mainly because Chip and Dale could've been involved but originals should've been main and "aged peter pan" was lame. It works as a film but doesn't change an actual chip n dale rescue rangers film or tv series has been an option since duck tales was sucessful (the reboot) and they went for this with them first or at all for a direct to streaming film too.
Being the good version of space jam 2 isn't a damn flex
I have a love hate relationship with this movie. On one hand I liked it and laughed at some parts, on the other hand I was also extremely disappointed with some of the decisions Disney made.
Peter Pan. :-(
There’s a very popular theory that this movie takes place in the modern world of Who Framed Roger Rabbit. Like same world where that movie took place.
It is the same world. It’s a spiritual successor to that movie. Even Roger Rabbit shows up.
Except toons can die here
Ugh
Fun fact: In earlier drafts of this movie, it was gonna be Jar Jar instead of Ugly Sonic.
Don't know if that would make the movie better or worse...
Who tf is jar jar
@@AdrianAnimations360 Good. Let him be forgotten.
Their sheer horror to seeing Peter Pan as the villain is 100% justified
I- I always thought Chip and Dale were brothers??
they were roommates, I've seen some of their pre-Rescue Rangers cartoon.
I think we all expected Gadget and Chip to hook up in this movie, but I don’t think anyone was prepared for Gadget and Zipper’s relationship and children. Like bruh that took me off-guard.
They wanted to subvert expectations, because that's always good.
…
Should've gone with nuking the White House. Equally unexpected, but slightly less offensive.
For those who claim Peter Pan’s story being similar to Bobby Discroll’s is just an accident by Disney I just wanna point out that the chances of that being true is next to none. They literally could’ve chosen any character to play the villain. Not only could it have been any Disney character, but literally any of the characters from all the film companies they bought for this movie. And why make him the villain?! Like that’s just messed up.. And even if it was an accident (Which it’s most likely not) the story is just still way too similar and just gives you bad vibes even if it wasn’t intentional.
Legit
People who think it's an accident that the two stories are coincidental, is that they could've chosen any other character to be a villain and nothing much would change, but they specifically chose Peter Pan of all people
@@Xendrick the symbolism would have changed.
Or, and hear me out on this, maybe they chose Peter Pan for the sake of irony. You know, because he's "the boy who never grew up".
@@mldavid4056 Or, and hear me out on this, you completely missed the overall point in the comment to hide in your well of ignorance of the actual situation.
@@samitrahill5723 I did not miss the point of the original comment. The original comment claims they chose Peter Pan to fill the role of washed-up former child actor because of the parallel it would draw to real-life actor Bobby Driscoll, with their main evidence being that they could've used any other character. I countered that claim by providing an alternative reason for Peter having been chosen, that being for the sake of irony since his nickname is "The boy who wouldn't grow up". No other character has that nickname, so no other character could've had that level of irony.
You should watch morbius! It’s my favorite movie of all time! It has changed my life for the better, and if I had the money, I would watch it one morbillion mor times.
It really is the movie of all time
Who framed Rodger Rabbit was a movie that popped into my mind while watching this movie. Not sure if anyone here remembers it, but it would be interesting to see you guys react to it.
Yes, people remember that movie. It was the movie that convinced Disney to put more money into the animation department and help start the Disney Renessaince with The Little Mermaid. Still the best mix of cartoons and live action to date.
This travesty is not even worthy enough to be mentioned in the same breath as Roger Rabbit.
Honestly I think Who Framed Rodger Rabbit reminded me why I hate modern Disney...
@@ry_jayy You realize that we’re talking about a movie from the 80s, right?
Unless your a movie buff, there’s no real reason for a teen to actively be all that aware of the movie. It’s not popular right now, the most recognized part of the movie is pretty much just Jessica Rabbit or the animation style IF you’re big into animation to begin with.
I’m 25, born 1998, it was already a ten year old film by that time. Let alone was I old enough to even take in the story and admire the animation, by the time I could it’s already been near 25 years since it originally came out.
Take that and account for the fairly large teen fanbase of Milk’s and you get a lot of kids who just never saw, let alone remember the fine details of the story or it’s methods it used for it’s animation.
I saw parts of it when I was around six to around ten, didn’t remember much and ended up mixing the main villain up with The Mask somehow.
We had it’s VHS tape, yet it still went ignored. Just like the likes of “little House of Horrors” and “The Goonies”, sure all popular but irrelevant to most younger audiences.
Rodger Rabbit is literally in this movie.
If Ralph Breaks the Internet wasn’t a thing, it would’ve been cool if rather than Chip and Dale, they had done a film starring Ralph and either Roger or more fittingly, Bonkers.
The plot could’ve been Ralph as a Rookie Cop being paired up with the more experienced Bonkers as they help Chip and Dale investigate the disappearance of Monterey Jack.
Never thought I’d live to see the day when DreamWorks characters appear in a Disney Movie
12:15 Can’t tell if they were being serious or not… I would like to see them continue with Season 1 and eventually get to the Tirek fight
Tbh I got the feeling they really didn't like Watchung since they kept saying it was boring which is fair enough. It's not for everyone
@@ignoreme7360 Honestly I can’t deny what you said. Even thought the demographic for the show definitely evolved dramatically, from a show typically targeted towards young girls to now girls, boys, and even adults, you’re right in saying is not for everybody. Not even because it’s bad, far from it, it just has a pretty basic premise, which is ironically so basic for literally anyone to learn, yet most people just choose not to
11:35 No we’re not nostalgic for rescue rangers, we’re nostalgic for the far superior version called “TaleSpin” featuring Baloo the bear in a leather bomber jacket flying a plane
i remember talespin
Sooooo does this mean we can make you guys watch who framed Roger rabbit?
MAKE THEM WATCH IT, MAKE THEM WATCH IT, MAKE THEM WATCH IT, MAKE THEM WATCH IT
They finally did!👍👍👍
There is a real life cult that worshipped gadget the mouse -fun fact
Based
@@SpillingTheMilk react to berserk.
@@SpillingTheMilk react to an anime called "loveless" I dare you to make it through one episode muhahahaha you are not prepared
I DIED when they included a Morbius cameo🤣🤣
This entire movie is just Disney flexing and showing off how many characters from different film companies they can buy
I was JUST asking about this last night while watching your Alvin and the Chipmunks (2007) reaction. WOOHOO!!!
Ugly Sonic was the highlight of this entire movie
TRUE!! I HONESTLY FELT LIKE HE WAS IN A WAY!! They embraced the ugly Sonic title and played with it to the fullest! Deadass- I feel like Ugly Sonic is the modern version of Scourge except he's the anti-live action Sonic.
I liked this movie, tho I understand why some people don’t. It almost felt like Disney was flexing their power and showing off that they can buy multiple characters from other film companies. They also took a lot of shots at other film companies, but never had the humility to make fun of themselves. Disney certainly has its flaws, but they believe they’re the Messiah of animation.
Yeah, as an adult I have a love/hate relationship with them. I haven't liked many of their recent animation movies (I think the last one I really enjoyed was Zootopia which is now 8 years old), they're shoving girl power messages down the throat without respecting the audience to get subtle messages while not actually showing the girl power (ex. Kim possible live action that found cheerleading too girly but had kim whine and cry about someone being better than her while having a make over montage and still be catty with another girl rival), and getting rid of their better cartoons like owl house and amphibia. I loved their marvel movies, but they won't go far enough into the darker aspects (which makes me worried about Blade but they did okay with Moon Knight so who knows), and they have a habit of taking properties that are a bit dark (like Artimis Fowl) and lightening them up (turning a character who was originally a villain and "forcing" them to be a villain but not actually a villain to make them maintain that good guy status (Artimis Forwl who was from a criminal family and just a bad guy and turning him into a kid who had to play the bad guy to save his father in his Disney movie)). And lastly, Disney's disregard to some of their best female characters Kida (Atlantis) and Esmerelda who were strong, independent, kick @s$ women who somehow doesn't get princess status but Mulan does (and she is not a princess but a general's wife or general herself depending on the movie). Kida is a literal queen but gets no recognition.
Disney has my nostalgia. I grew up with them and I still love the 90s and early 00s movies. But lately the power has gone to their heads, everything is CGI (throw in 2d animation from time to time Disney), I find the pacing in the newer animation movies not very good, with messages too obvious and distracting in the movie. Hell, watching Beauty and the Beast (1991) yesterday I realized there was a subtle message of how society kind of worships toxic male behavior stereotypes of how the townspeople knew of Gaston's ugly personality and worshipped him while the smart inventor (the nerd) was scorned and the beast was mocked for being "too kind and gentle to fight back". Again, it's a love hate relationship with them. Even disapproving, I cant help but keep coming back. They do some good things (I have liked their star wars tv series), and some bad things (company practices and some of their other movies as mentioned). They brought me good memories and I hope they continue to do so and fix their sleezy practices.
They included ugly sonic so much clearly as a marketing gimmick, and they didn’t even pay SEGA to add him in. They are just flaunting their status as a media empire by flagrantly breaking copyright law. Sure, he’s a parody or whatever, in the same vein Dumb Starbucks is a parody. But at least Dumb Starbucks is like just one location, they’re a small business and can loosely get away with it as performance art, but Disney? They are a literal corporate juggernaut who could’ve easily spent the money to actually license the usage of ugly sonic but have gotten so big and powerful they instead decided to just steal and flaunt ugly sonic during the height of sonic movie 2 hype so that they could leech off said hype to get more views. And that’s just sonic, how many other of those cameos were unlicensed IP theft?
@@antonberkbigler5759 I hate Disney too but that doesn’t mean they are breaking copyright law. You can’t just say it does because this movie is weird.
@@madisnzz Ok I am regurgitating talking points, but hear me out. Ugly Sonic is a semi-major background character that has plot relevance, who blatantly utilizes a semi-modified version of Sonic’s original movie design. The only major differing thing about him is his name, i.e. Ugly Sonic instead of just Sonic. I have also heard that Disney in now way contracted or even consulted SEGA or Paramount about including and using the Sonic IP in the movie, and therefore the Ugly Sonic name can be construed as a way of copyright dodging a lá Dumb Starbucks.
But honestly Disney straight up committing crimes with this movie isn’t even the worst thing they did here, they basically took a shit on Bobby Driscoll’s grave.
12:36 I’m pretty sure those guys were looking at Lumiere off screen, it’s been cut out from the video but in the movie you could see Lumiere was standing where the people were looking at. A human candle set a guy on fire, I would be looking there too.
LOOK if you pause at 12:43 , you can see Lumiere! This joke doesn’t work if you have seen the movie, but THEY ARE WATCHING THE MOVIE!!!!!
Gadget banging a fly and having a few dozen hybrid fly-rat kids... Yeah, I'm gonna need a minute to process ALL OF THAT.
I wonder if they'll make a Big Mouth joke since John Mulaney plays Andrew
They didn't.
They did, but I cut it out. Sorry...
@@Giyeh_ no need. As long as i know they actually made that joke 🙏🏼🙏🏼
I love the plot of this movie because it’s genuinely interesting like imagine “cartoon crime syndicate kidnaps others characters and turns them into bootlegs to sell for profit overseas” that shit could actually hit
12:15 “you can’t make us”
The internet: “I beg to differ”
I HATE the fact that the 'main' 2D cast isn't actually 2D, it's just 3D made to LOOK like 2D- but then the 2D background characters are ACTUALLY proper 2D?? God I hate that so much. Maybe it isn't obvious to non-artists, I really don't know. But to me it's distracting as fuck.
6:20 actually, they're both cgi. Disney wanted the roger rabbit movie money, but couldn't bother putting in the effort to make it, IE hand drawn animation. So every character is computer animated.
Also you should watch Who Framed Roger Rabbit. That's an actually good movie with real love and care put into it.
12:10
As a reminder, if we can get their last my little pony video up to 7,000 likes they have to watch more. We have the power.
Let's do it!
I’m not gonna lie. The whole video I’ve been confused on which one Chip is. Same with Dale. I’m now referring to each one of them as Chip n Dale
chip, black nose and teeth close together, Dale, buck teeth and red nose, oh and also he has more fur on his head than chip does.
"Getting into their drug problems?" Nah, man. Monterey Jack was there from the beginning. XD
Calling the CGI in this movie a makeover for traditional animation, is like calling Michael Jackson’s Voldemort face the next step in evolution.
We need them to continue watching MLP
Agreed! Otherwise they'll never see the Lord of chaos!
10:26 That’s not sucking at comedy lmao. Y’all are seriously funny.
Still absolutely can not believe that there was a few seconds in this movie, in the police station, with a big mouth character in the background.
3:51 Nice fan poster.
As someone who loves the movie, your reactions were hilarious.
Take a shot every time there is a cameo
Oh no I am dead
"how may shots are there?"
"yes"
17:56 Was that supposed to be Gumball?!
2:00 over 2,000 is crazy
Rookie numbers
I really didn't like this one. Firstly 'cause they used Chip 'n' Dale of all things as a vehicle for Disney to flex how much they own, and secondly 'cause I find the portrayal of Peter Pan incredibly tasteless considering the fate of his original voice actor.
Oh yeah, also 'cause it's the equivalent of jangling keys in front of a toddler for nostalgia obsessed millenials with no substance otherwise.
Post Scriptum: The billboard at the end (19:15) is advertising a drink called ShimaRisu (Chipmunk) Sweat... Nevermind, my opinion has completely changed, this is the greatest film of all time.
Half of the stuff in this film isn't even Disney properties though
@@mustardyboi4187 Granted, but it still reeks of monopolization to me. I also doubt that Disney would spend all of the money necessary for licensing those other characters if they didn't either have designs on owning those IPs or plan on at least tripling their investment.
Though I suppose some of those IP holders could've given their characters to Disney as some type of advertisement, but that seems like a bit of a stretch. I know that I'm considering all of this from a purely business perspective, but honestly, this movie is so bereft of creativity and artistic intent that I'd be shocked if it _wasn't_ written by soulless corporate suits.
@@YasugoLiehuwhat happened to the original Peter Pan's voice actor?
5:50 surprise pekora laugh lmao
8:54 That's a doll of Rapunzel from Tangled not Barbie XD
4:42 Batmetal Killed Flounder...
This felt like Ralph Breaks with Internet with the amount of references
Except this time they cashed in on meme culture, the drip Dobby meme, ugly Sonic, and whatever else was in this movie
this movie could have worked really well if it was Bonkers movie with
Bonkers uncovering the bootleg ring with Popeye's adoptive son being the
mobster in charge of the outfit like Mr. B from KND. and Bonker's old
partner having undergone claymation surgery to become a toon.
For some reason, seeing Sora's hair was a nope for me. Like that was the one thing off limits (which is ironic since Kingdom Hearats is literally half disney.)
8:57 when you and your friend group are having a convo in vc and one of them just casually says some fucked up shit that genuinely concerns everyone else
13:22 Spilling the Milk simping for Gadget!
6:04 OK this right here. Pissed off the Entire community and i am doing Clean up. This film is not real. Zipper if their DOG she did not breed wit the family dog. So lets be clear. This is not a Rescue Rangers movie. it is a Chip and Dale movie with Rescue Rangers appearing in it. So do not consider this cannon in anyway. She would not bag the family dog. That is gross. She loves no one. She just likes to invent.
4:15 Bruh, this part almost killed me...😩
I legit almost choked on my Mcdonalds Breakfast Biscuit💀
I actually really enjoyed this movie even though it gave me an existential crisis.
This movie fully connects all Disney properties and properties beyond it. I think we should call it the Disney Cinematic Extended Universe or DCEU for short..... wait a minute.
Idk if anyone mentioned it but the story of Petey in the movie is scarily similar to the actual voice actor of Peter Pan in that movie
16:05 SONIC and the FBI
0:49
All the goat milk you can drink for free
3:33 best part
this isnt even the full movie but like. this honestly makes me feel like dying. Like honestly i just felt this dread wash over me at the end
why?
@@EpicFableBean what is culture anymore but a corporate property for profit
@@josome7451 and that is a criticism how?
@@EpicFableBean Because it leads to lazyness and a lack of creativity. Re-use old IP's, rush out and mass produce lazy movies. Stuff like that.
@@josome7451 and yes this turn out to be fun and imaginative.
18:22 I just noticed thei even though I've seen his movie twice but thats fucking johnny test anime in the background
"You think this chipmunk's gonna fuck a giraffe? It ain't gonna happen!"
Proven wrong minutes later. If a fly and a mouse could have a few dozen kids, then anything is possible.
I don't care what anyone says I f***ing love this movie. Don't really like that much but the effort in bringing back a somewhat version of Who Frame Rgoer Rabbit is good enough for me and my kids.
More power to ya!
@@SpillingTheMilk probably helps they werent being autistic over it
I actually loved the plot despite having no connection to most of the main characters
I'm new to this channel! First video I first saw on their Twitch and it was a real treat! 🥛
Looks like we meet again. lol
@@TheCommenterDragon hello! 🤭
3:34 Top 5 Side-Characters
I actually really like this movie. I watched Rescue Rangers when I was little an I didn't think they were gonna do anything with them an I thought they did it really well. I can get how people might not like the movie because they didn't grow up on it which honestly what did you expect? I feel like Rescue Rangers, Wreck it Ralph, and Roger Rabbit do the reference humor right tho unlike Ready player one, kinda the lego movie an the newest Loony Tunes movie were they kinda just barf out everything on screen.
XD Your reaction to the ponies.
Also, did you know there's an actual cult that worships gadget? Not kidding.
I love how you were sarcastic about how people would react when seeing a famous children's character before doing that exact reaction when seeing Ugly Sonic. Amazing.
5:44 The bootleggers kidnapp Cruella Deville, and then they slapped her on the cover of Dalmatians 3 for the PS2.
My little pony! I used to wonder what friendship could be!
Until you all shared its magic with me!!
@@Im_alivexx Big adventure! Tons of fun! A beautiful heart fate! Full and strong! Sharing kindness! It's an easy feat!
Did you know that there is a cult in Russia dedicated to Gadget from Rescue Rangers
I actually enjoyed watching this movie it’s, it had its flaws but overall really enjoyed it 👍
It was a one time turn your brain off
and forgeting about in next week
@@user-hq4bj8fy2b yea
12:08 WATCH MLP
When the world needed them most they reacted
Gadget sounds like that because that's how shes always talked. It's her cartoon voice actor
I really like this movie, it was like Space Jam 2 but done right. I dont really mind cameos when the movies meant to be about existing characters interacting with each other. It was a cool one off for me
This movie is just Chip n' Dale: A new Legacy
I
Need
To
Consume
Product
I love spilling the milk
This was the most disturbing thing you've ever watched. I think I'm now slightly insane.
that road chip
Yup they did Ralph breaks the Internet and also Wreck-It Ralph the original movie
I like when you guys saw the My Little Pony thing every just had a PTSD episode
10:53 the chipsons
Perfect timing!