Red Dead Redemption [PS5] vs [PS3] | Direct Comparison
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 08. 2023
- Direct visual comparison of the recently released PlayStation 4 version of Rockstar's hit open-world western game, Red Dead Redemption and how it stacks up to the original release of the game on PlayStation 3.
Gameplay is being captured on a PlayStation 5 console via backwards compatibility. PS3 gameplay is captured directly on a PlayStation 3 console.
This video discusses the game's updated resolution, performance, any changes made to the gameplay mechanics, character models, environments, lighting, shadows, effects, and sound effects.
Stay tuned to this channel for a large-scale documentary on the History of the Red Dead Series, coming soon!
#reddeadredemption #rdr #directcomparison - Hry
![Evolution of Red Dead Redemption [2004-2023]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/252l3mOEABc/mqdefault.jpg)
![Evolution of Red Dead Redemption [2004-2023]](/img/tr.png)
![The Last of Us Part 1 [Remake] vs Remastered | Direct Comparison](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/E9PFOhaKNFw/mqdefault.jpg)
For the price they want, they should have included a microscope to be able to see the changes they made
Even if you had a microscope, the changes would be nonexistent
So true
The only difference I saw so far was the resolution
And give you a large screen so you can see it even better
Theres clearly a major difference in performance - the game doesn't need a microscope its just u need glasses cause ur vision sucks
You put more work into this video than they did with the port.
Sad but true. The old Rockstar is no more.
Just like Blizzard. People who do OW porn make way better work than those lazy @ss devs
@@donovanschoor1473”The old Rockstar is no more” reading this is chilling, they were my fav devs for so long. Not sure if I should have any hope for GTA6.
Rockstar is too busy printing money as normies buy shark cards.
@@donovanschoor1473rockstar has been overrated for a while now. Ever since red dead 1 and gta 5 over a decade ago, they have released (gta 5 again and again and again, gta trilogy didn’t work, red dead 2, which was good, but def was not as good as the first game and didn’t even come close to the same online experience. Just good graphics and AI. Which is fine, but if the game lacks fun then who cares, and now this 1/2 ass release without any online play. I’m not sure what anybody can really expect. They aren’t any better than bethesda. They do the same bs
I don’t think this is a bad product, just a bad price. If this was released for $20, it would be fair.
Yeah it looks pretty good but not $50 good
It'll br on PS Plus or Gamepass within the year. Just hold off like the GTA trilogy did.
Agreed.
@@CanasketIt's part on ps plus discount for the Red Dead Redemption bundle. You can get RD1, the dlcs, RD2 and RDO for 90€
@@CanasketGTA trilogy was on plus?
It was fun seeing how the “blur” filter smoothed out the jagged edges, making them look round. When I replayed the game on Xbox Series S I went “I didn’t remember things being this jagged”, and it turns out I was right!
And while it’s obviously much sharper and clearer, there was a charm to the old version. To start with there’s a “glow” to it missing from the new version. Plus there was a charm to the softness, helping to hide rough edges and leaving up more to the imagination. The new sharper version reveals it all, and it can sometimes be unflattering to the game.
i agree!! glad there are still people out there with taste that don't only care about 11/10 sharpness
Exactly. Was about to type something about this. Something with the old gameplay just coincided with the 1910s era, for some reason, the inclarity gave the game character.
To be clear, it is not Sonys fault that you have to pay 50 dollars, this is purely Rockstar's greed.
Rockstar and Take-Two Interactive
Take-two interactive is to be blamed
@@jishan6992 Ah yes, because Rockstar is never in the wrong in anything they do, it's always the big bad evil corporation Take-Two. Always blame Take-Two I guess.
Honestly, I think this is Nintendo's fault. Rockstar adjusted the prices and quality parameters following what the Switch has to offer, how Skyrim and Mario Kart 8 are sold at full price (among other fossils), etc.. so really, this game running at 60fps, most likely the Switch can't handle it. So they ported Red Dead with the Switch in mind, the Sony users are going to pay the price (quite literally)
Sony's loop hole in consoles allowed it though. It's because of that reason we can't even play some of the sony's own exclusive games as well in the newer console unless sony resale it with full price again which sony is doing alot recently. Rockstar just join the the party along
I love how they put RDR2's gun sounds in the trailer but the port still has the old sounds. 👏
old sounds are better
That would be the one thing I wouldn't ever want changed. The way sound was handled in RDR1 was my favourite thing about it. Just listen to that first conversation at Fort Mercer, it sounds like a spaghetti western, it's glorious.
believe it or not the sound was different in the ps3 version of rdr1 compared to the 360. if you test the springfield rifle and some of the pistols and revolvers on both versions you can tell for some reason the ps3 has more worst airsoft sounding guns.
@@tennisthelegendNah
The old guns sound like canons
I like the sound of the old guns, goes with the goofy spaghetti western style of the game
Mafia 1 is a clear example how to bring back a old game to the new world.
True, except thats a full remake and many diehard mafia fans actually dislike the narrative changes
Yes, but 30fps on consoles ruins the game for me
@Rumskas it shouldnt. 30fps is perfectly fine on a console game considering the camera rotation used with joysticks.
@@Nick930 when I get used to 60 I just can't go back to 30, feels too slow and laggy
@Rumskas yeah i dont mind it. Takes maybe.. 10min to get used to the change.
I obviously would prefer higjer framerates. But as long as its a locked framerate without huge dips, its not a dealbreaker to me
Something people should also know is that if you don't own RDR2 then they have it in sale on the PlayStation store where you get both games for $66 dollars. The original for $50 is a horrible price but I feel like both games $66 if you don't already own the 2nd is a good value. Also most people were expecting a full remaster because of all the rumors even though Rockstar themselves never said anything about remastering the game.
R* had a PR disaster with the trilogy, its almost idiotic to think they would want to risk that again. They have ported games over for years, the majority of anger is from people who have already played it where as I am someone who hasnt so it definitely feels more geared towards people who only played 2
finally somebody else who sees this for what it actually is, a simple port of a game. All these media outlets and content creators jumping on the bandwagon and complaining that nothing has been improved just to get clicks while at the same time completely ignoring that fact the Rockstar hasn't made a single claim that this is upgraded or remastered in way.
@@cmac8722most people I've seen are shitting on it for being a port idc where you're looking
i would 100% agree with this if they didn't charge $50. I mean, how can you defend this when they are literally charging you almost full game price for a game that is literally a decade old, almost unchanged
@nicolasaranda7035 I would have to agree with Nick930 here that this re-release is "an example of too little, too late". Honestly if this game was ported in, let's say, 2017 before RDR2's release a year later, most people would've been cool with it and probably would've re-purchased it in droves.
Not to mention, this re-release also dispells and disproves the notion that Rockstar couldn't port RDR to future consoles back then because of the "broken spaghetti code".
Rockstar didnt improve the game but the PS5 hardware did 😂
💯
A port isnt even meant to improve the game, it is LITERALLY a port that Rockstar didn't even advertise, all of you just care so much about any tiny thing Rockstar does.
@@thirdhandlv4231 they did advertise it in a trailer
They only "improved" the price, well to rockstar themselves atleast
@@Complete_Stranger7050You say this below the video that shows that Rockstar improved the look of the game xd
"Corporate wants you to find the difference between these two games"
"They're the same game"
Bro they literally just PORTED the game to PS5 and PS4. They didn't even update the game or anything. Only the PS5 hardware improved the game 😂
@@Zona984 It's not even a native PS5 port. It's backwards compatible. The shadows, anisotropic filtering, anti-aliasing were modified from the engine itself. The hardware doesn't "improve" the game.
That's the definition of a port yes.@@Zona984
Did they ever claim that it wasn’t the same game? Gamers are professional whiners, stop bitching
@fucka1386 stop trying to defend Rockstar bro. They're not gonna sleep with you.
Nice video man, Been a huge fan for a really long time now! Thank you for these! 😀 hug from PORTUGAL.
Just imagine all the mods this game could've had if it was on PC 13 years ago.
The sad thing is: Red Dead Redemption 1 is still an amazing game and could have been improved to give a new generation of gamers a good experience + give the PC finally a chance to play it but I guess porting it over and wanting 50€/$ for minimal effort was the easier cash grab
Pretty on par for R*
I think the PC version will come at a later time.
It's already on pc. Emulators.
but modding potenital would be better if it wasnt on a goddamn emulator@@madsteve92
I thought pc owners can emulate any game
The fact that the ps3 version had internal lighting like that blows my mind!
It was Mixed Lighting in PS3(Baked +Realtime)
And it couldn't handle it. Like many large games like this, the PS3 rarely got up to 30fps compared to the 360.
Yeah, that Cell was pretty impressive when developers really knew how to use it. But the first game that REALLY took advantage of it was The Last of Us and that was its last game so as impressive as it was, it was definitely not the right choice given how hard it made development
@@sureztv5836yeah, same as GTA V, Michael's house in the afternoon is one great example, the bounce lighting on the front door is just amazing, and it affects dynamic models too, not just static.
Power of the CELL. 💪🏻
rdr1 is in my top 3 favourite games of all times. I've 100% it like 5 times and played thru it even more often.
but this would've been the reason i wouldn't have been super exited if it was a proper remaster with 60 fps and maybe some gameplay upgrades. the only way they could have made it desirable for me would be a remake in the rdr2 engine because then the game would feel new and exciting again.
and the sad thing is, that i feel like it's not that hard for them because most of the old map is already ported and they could've used most assets and animations from rdr2.
in a different timeline we defenitely got rdr1 as a rdr2 dlc.
What have port to do with new rdr 2 engine? There is no way that they can make this game on rdr 2 engine...
@@nelAjamZ why?
@@The97Noname Game is outdated, well, sure they can make remake or remastered but that will take years... Rdr was and is perfect cawboy game and definitive way better than Rdr 2 in my opinion... Rdr 2 have only advantage on graphic and overall is very slow game... Rdr in other side is very fast, action package type game...
@@nelAjamZ that's what I said. they should've remade it in the new engine
@@The97Nonameit wouldn't work not only because the first is more Spaghetti Western (a.k.a. darker, bleaker and bloodier and action packed stories about revenge) while the second is more classical western also the second one is way too realistic which simply doesn't fit the atmosphere and tone of the first which felt more "Western" and with old Rockstar's comedy. it would lose it's essence.
People in 2010: “Boy I can’t wait to see what these graphics look like in the future”
People in 2023: “This is the exact same game”
Rdr2:
People living in the real world in 2023: "Of course it's exactly the same, Rockstar didn't mention a remaster or remake. Idiots just believed false rumour and got mad when they realised the false rumours weren't true"
@@cmac8722 rockstar likes money I mean they don’t per say listen to their fan base but I still enjoy some of their games, but also why did they remove 300 cars from gta 💀
I'm sorry, but this is a huge disservice to the new games that have come out recently.
you want like definitive edition again
Surprising how when I was a kid, I literally could only be happy and excited whenever Rockstar announced to release something. Now I am an adult and I close my eyes and slightly open them with shame to realize that every new Rockstar release disappoints me and makes me angry. What a pity. To think that my dream was to one day work there as a dev.
I feel like being a rockstar dev would still be really cool since they’re not the one’s making these remasters and ports. Which i feel like is the problem. But you can’t blame them because it looks to me that they’re putting all their man power into GTA VI and either don’t have enough time or devs to make decent remasters or remakes for us in the meantime
Don't forget they made one of the best raceing games to back in the day midnight club
Nah, RDR2 was insane. GTA6 is going to be great too, just after seeing all the leaks
@@gloriouspurpose_RDR 2 was a snoozefest and no one has seen GTA VI yet lol
@@gloriouspurpose_ Yes, 100%! Still frustrating to see R* frustrate their fans with smalle releases like this. GTA3logy and now this.
Give it 60 fps, Multiplayer and for 30 € then it would have been an instant buy for me.
For you
I thought they were gonna remaster rdr1 :/
@@Zona984 remake not remaster
@@DOVM6336It's neither.
Should be $15 max.
It would have been nice to see what they could have done if they’d upgraded the visuals to match Red Dead Redemption 2. But that’s pretty much a remaster and a huge undertaking. Being able to play Red Dead Redemption for the first time after knowing what happens in Red Dead Redemption 2? I’m excited. But I’ll definitely be waiting a while for a sale.
A huge undertaking yes, but Rockstar could have given it the treatment that Nintendo gave to the New Zelda. Tears of the Kingdom was supposed to be DLC, but they eventually decided to just take the same map, add to it, and make another game. Rockstar already fully remade New Austin in RDR2, and used it for next to nothing. I guess this ship sailed years ago, but I was sure they were going to release a DLC that was another story involving that area. Remaking 1 in 2's engine after 2 leading directly into it seems like an extremely obvious move, especially with gamers clamoring for remakes right now. But no - we only got updates to online play, GTA "remakes" so laughably bad and lazy that they became a meme, and this shamefully priced port.
@@joecascetti8375 I agree. They could have done more. Especially to justify the price hike. But apparently RDR 1’s code is a mess so to do a remake using RDR2’s engine? Something tells me that’d take another decade (or not, if they reuse assets-who knows?). I think they just want to move on to other stuff.
Rockstar used to actually mock what they now represent, incredible how success and money changes people. They used to be my favourite publisher back in the day, how things have changed.
Almost every AAA games are like this. Then there is online games which is filled with micro transactions. Nowadays gaming feels like a boring task.
@@papi7953Ah... Online games are sort of a curse in disguise to the whole gaming racket. Infact, isn't that when rockstar suddenly changed? When they released GTA Online. Milked for a decade and more, they do it so much they're not even compelled to make video games anymore. Took way too long to release another new game.
Admittedly though RDR2 seemed very passionate, and luckily RDO failed. Perhaps that'll push them to focus on developing a good, new game.
Blame take two
@@kenz2756Won’t happen. They will just bring everything to GTA online from now on. That’s where their money is.
They aren’t the same company/people anymore. The real Rockstar devs left years ago.
Love these Direct Comparisons! Been a huge fan for a really long time now! Thank you for these! 😀
Can you imagine how cool it would've been if they would've released RDR+UN as an expansion pack for RDR2(playing it all within the RDR2 engine)? I would've preordered THAT in a heartbeat, even at $60 or 70!
Same I was so hype for the gta remasters but they were even more lazy than this
Yes exactly they Could have Remade RDR1 but with RDR2’s graphics and mechanics and engine they only needed to add Mexico they could have used the Audio from RDR1 it could have been Amazing
Would have been an instant buy. This, not so much.
It would be awesome to play through RDR2 as Authur, then when you switch to John, stuff happens and time gets forwarded four years then RDR kicks off.
You have that in PlayStation Store. It's 100 bucks
60fps and 4k now the game looks amazing on ps5
1 of the best game's ever made. Also the soundtrack is so beautifully done aswell
I do wanna replay and actually platinum this game but I’m content to wait for a price cut. Guaranteed to happen in the near future as Sony always has online store sales
Black Friday coming up soon. Guarantee to be a sale then. I would definitely jump back in at $25-$30. Especially with it being RDR1 and Undead nightmare.
@@iwasright9686 - Definitely!!
@@iwasright9686when’s Black Friday?
The lack of effort they put into the framerate or anything is just baffling. Nothing is really different with the port at all. Great videos always. Absolutely loved the comparisons! ❤❤❤
It looks ironed out flat at a locked 30 fps. I prefer the original hardware limitation in some games. They got a more cinematic feel and bring back that nostalgia, that emulators don't emulate.
First time I played Assassin's Creed 2 on PC, it felt so cheap. Sometimes I want that crappy frame rate. 😅
Glasses needed 🤓
@@diizziisame thing happened to me when i played ac2 on pc
@@diizzii true some games with low frame rates are good. Lol and sometime nostalgia of old games without doing much differences to them is a good thing. Lol just the pricing is crazy for rdr1 lol 😂😭
@@Bizzy_372 👁️🫦👁️ I can see them well love 😂💞
I'm sure someone else has already commented this but: we do have 60fps now :) I think as of October. Been playing the game and it runs smooth as butter.
You used to be able to play the PS3 version of Red Dead Redemption on PS4/5 with the classics catalogue on PS+ Premium, but then rockstar made Sony remove it so they could re-release it for last gen consoles.
to me it seems like Rockstar hate PlayStation as they are not making Xbox fans have to buy a re-release only PlayStation fans... also the Xbox RDR1 online free roams still have 13-15 players...
Yeah, Rockstar knows their gamers are dumber than hell. That's why they haven't bothered to make a real new game since 2011 (LA Noire). Because their gamers seem to be content playing recycled garbage over and over, they may never make another actual game. They'll just make GTA and Read Dead remakes until time runs out.
Imagine paying 50 dolllars to play 13 year old game in 30 fps lock 😂😂
😂THANK YOU. Yes. That's what I've been trying to say, but you summed it up beautifully.
people are mega entitled when it comes to videogames nowadays, 30 fps isnt optimal but its really not that bad
@@waffler-yz3gwbud 30 fps is good but 60 fps isn't much to ask for , ps5 is more than capable of it.
@@muqxxt rdr1 runs at 60 fps on ps5
I predict that Rpcs3 will eventually run this game at high frame rates as improvements are constantly being made and most games are very playable already.
Xenia should be able to already run it very well if you can handle Xenia's shitty to nonexistent GUI
@@sloideh Xenia plays it at a very easy 60fps most of the time. Xenia is GPU bound while RPCS3 is CPU bound.
@@sloideh Thanks for your reply! I was not aware of this, shame about the poor GUI, but most important thing is the performance. Cheers 👍
switch emulators are already making the game work in vulkan so we could see resource packs or mods for that version in the future
@@LyricalViking Oh really? Thankyou, that is interesting to know. I have a decent CPU and GPU (i7 8700 with GTX 1080) maybe I should finally give them a try now? I've been waiting for stabilty and performance to improve a bit more (been watching CZcams channels like Alexwpi Game) but seems like things are much better now, for most games at least.
Great comparison!
Love your content bud! Anychance you'll do armored core?
You comparision are more detailed than some video games!
Explain what are these "some" video games.
@@erso_returned2530 simpsons hit and run
@@erso_returned2530 bloons td 6
@@erso_returned2530 devil cry 2
@@Danklovicwhat???
Just a side note. LODS are not improved nor is vegetation coverage. This just appears better with the resolution and the only actual upgrade is better anisotropic filtering
Vegetation actually appears slightly denser at 4:28 and a few other places.
$50 for an increase in vegetation, hell yeah
Yeah, like we would buy it for $50 because of more vegetation.
Why do you talk like we know what this is
@@MaXXXXXXXXXXim because some people do, and those that do get it. Hence the 92 likes Vs your one comment mate
I seem to be the only person who is extremly thankful for this remaster and really benefits from it because i only played the second game which is the best game i ever played, i never experienced a story and characters so well written like that in any kind of medium so im so great i can see how the story continues with john.
For me the last of us is the best game
@@senpai28750 that of course comes right after red dead 2 also an incredible game and i even loved the second part even tough it has its controversy
No, it's awesome. But it is overpriced by about $20
@@kuruptzZz yeah probably and i wish they somehow edited arthurs diary in shouldnt be that hard to put one item in a game but im very happy about it still
this is a PS3 port of RDR1 its not a remaster... why are there so many idiots who think its a remaster...
I really had a hype of being able to play RDR 1, but not under this condition and price.
Thanks for your video 🙌
3 years ps5 has been out and RDR2 has still not been given 60fps mode.
Probably won't happen, honestly. All they care about is GTA Online. And they seem to be fans of 30fps as well.
My cusin ps6 120 fps
Rockstar waiting to release that update for 60 bucks
@@pengu6335 They never fixed the offline more on PC either. You are supposed to be able to launch Rockstar games offline if you launch them online at least once per week but that has been broken for RDR2 for years. And we all know how terrible the GTA4 PC port runs. They update the game to remove music when the licensing expires just so they can keep selling the game but they don't fix performance.
@@chamoo232 With the way GTA 4 is, it kinda explains why we never got a PC version of RDR1.
people who bought this for 50 bucks should see a doctor 🤣
some people didnt get the chance to play it back in the days and loved rdr2 so much they wanted to play it, even for 50 bucks 🤷♂
@@janprokes2930 20-30 bucks would have been ok, 50 is not. dont support the greed of rockstar my boy
@@janprokes2930You can get it for 30 on xbox
Absolutely SCANDAELOUS
@@Stepbackandsee01great answer my brother💪🏼
Excellent review.
What I want to know is, where was John coming from when on the ferry in Blackwater? He lives just up the road.
This comparison is all about 4K vs 720p. Textures, AO, foliage, LOD nothing has been improved, this isn't even a ''remaster''. And here we were hoping for a remake. Damn rockstar...
It's not supposed to be a remaster. Its a port
It never was called a remaster. I wish it was a remaster
Yeah, nah... it's just a lame re-release on newer systems. I think it's even released on Nintendo Switch, too. lol
@@Boomer112yes it is on switch lol . Probably why they felt no need to remaster it cuz the switch can't run it at 60fps.
@@deagle7602 Hah yeah, that's probably one of the reasons.
my most fav game of all time. hearing the music takes me back to 2010 and the hot summer days when I used to play it. a pity what they have (not) done to my baby.
got in on the switch as i felt that was the only way to play this "updated" version. pretty awesome being able to lay down and explore the west and it looks and plays well enough where i dont notice anything jarring
5:35 It's now fixed with the last update. Now, the sun is shining through the windows as well.
I bought this game for my 360 in 2015 for only $15, and I can play it for free on my Series X 😀
No one cares 😃
@@adriantrusca1245 lol
@@adriantrusca1245Lol mad sony fanboy
yeah but you own an Xbox so who really took an L here
@@eliwallace3825Xbox is more powerful though so who really took an L here
It's crazy that Rockstar Games didn't even REMASTER the game AT LEAST...
least?remaster only thing you could hope for , no remake was on work and its fact lol , you guys bragging about rdr 2 engine remake is so annoying
@@labelnineit is so bad to play rdr1 on modern consoles with rdr2 graphics
Given that so many people complain about remasters, a port is a safer bet......
@@Wol1427Someone who actually used his mind! Ports are better, Remastered games never end well, GTA San Andreas or MW2 Remastered are just bad.
The port is remastered. The lighting and image resolution is cleaner. I think you mean REMAKE.
It's a real joy to be able to play this masterpeice at a cleaned up1080p on the current gen consoles.
What background song are you using in the video? Thank you! 😊
U can find it on CZcams. Red dead redemption soundtrack
I like the color pallet on PS3 more. I also give a small nod to the sound on PS3. Unlike most though, I am happy with this simpler remaster, I just disagree with the price, lack of multiplayer and lack of PC port.
this isn't a "remaster" at all though
It’s the same exact damn game, just with a higher resolution. It isn’t a remaster.
I would've preferred to see upscaled Xbox X Vs PS 5 but great video nevertheless!
There is a vid like that. Series x looks quite a bit better
The big difference is shadow resolution, Xbox is the original game in backwards compatibility emulator and still has the fuzzy shadows from Xbox 360. The new ports have increased the shadow detail (maybe too much).
@@therookie5714 That's the color/saturation. The image quality is better on the new port but I also like the color and contrast of the original. Apparently, you can fix that by turning off HDR.
@@tendjinn idk what it was I was just going off what I saw
@@therookie5714on a small phone screen?
Look at this through a large TV in 4k and you'll see that the new ports look better, much more smoother and cleaner.
NICE VIDEO
3:09 “… all the praise for this release ends.”
*continues to praise the release*
When the video does a better job than Rockstars Portfolio of Ports.
Wait this is still a 30 fps lock? 😂😂😂
Yup
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Did they fix the headless glitch and/or endless graveyard zombies glitch in Undead Nightmare?
No 60fps is unforgiveable here
Yeah because everything else is forgivable. Everything else is totally completely normal but 60 fps is the only problem.
Would you recommend any changes in the controls for this game?
Disable aim assist
I mean, im glad that people that are happy with a basic port will get the chance to play it on their Switch, or PS5. Its an amazing game and holds up well, even today. But R* KNEW we wanted a full blown remaster. This could have been epic, playing RDR with RDR2 visuals, or even better. Was looking forward to playing this in 4K/60 FPS.
Even though it's overpriced, I'm glad it's a somewhat faithful port. It's better than what we got with the gta triliogy, in my opinion. Picking up the switch version when the price drops.
"The turd we got in the mail is shinier."
@@ko7577 the port isn't bad at all its just a bad price
Whoever paid $50 need the heads seeing to. Rockstar are a complete joke.
From Rockstar what we just ask as a gamer
* New HD texture
* Improved Animation and physics
* And 60fps
but even after 13 years what we got A straight PORT
What we get from community modders
* New HD textures
* ReShade mod
* 60 fps
* 4K resolution
* Natural & Realistic Lighting mod
I just wanted at the very least a flippin' official port for PC. At that point at least modders could take over remastering the dang game for years to come.
They've conditioned you to aim way too low. What people should have asked for - given that it's a "next-gen" console - is a next-gen Red Dead. An actual real new game.
@@DeSch0ft What you don't get is a new game that's actually worth paying for.
@@ko7577 and have gta 6 take another 3 years to release? no thank you. i'd rather them focus their resources and manpower on a new game rather than a game they made 13 years ago and is still perfectly playable
What's the song playing in the background ?
I'm going to wait a bit to see if it goes on sale !!
Hi Nick, Love your videos. Can you do a direct comparison to Outer Worlds and its recent rerelease Space's Choice Edition. Can't find a in-depth comparison other than benchmarks. Thanks!
I assume its just season pass content bundled with it right? Like a GOTY edition?
@@Nick930 No. It has upgraded visuals all over the board.
Came with a big graphical update.@@Nick930
Playing on pc at 60fps or even 120fps using Xenia is by far the best way to experience this game, there are also other graphical improvements which can be enabled providing you have a decent pc.
From what I hear it's a nightmare to get it running on PC. 🤷🏽♂️
That's likely the PS3 version which isn't still fully runnable.
@@thisiswhatgarbagelookslike3864use switch emulator ryujinx it works like wonder even with 1650 😂 runs 60 fps at 1440p ! And if you have anything higher like 3060 can get 60fps 4k !
@@thisiswhatgarbagelookslike3864it's a nightmare to get any ported game on pc to work
some people arent cool with stealing games
For anyone that's played the port, how does the controls feel?
Will you ever do a "history of RDR" video?
dang as old as the game is. it looks really good. holds up really well.
I JUST WANT GRAND THEFT AUTO 4 ON MY PS5!!! IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK?!?!😩😩
they're re-releasing two previously made games in fiscal year 2024 so gta 4 possibly the next one
Yeah me too
Xbox Series X has GTA 4 backwards compatible and its been backwards compatible since 2016 when Microsoft started making all the Xbox Original and Xbox 360 games backwards compatible with Xbox One...
The online for this game was soo fun back then, miss those days
Apparently they stealth dropped 60fps sometime after release
I won't blame Rockstar for thier greed, as they very well know there are idiots out there who will pay 50$ for a 13 year old game.
I would agree if it weren’t $50, that’s just disrespectful to the community.
$30 is enough for the morons who will buy it.
@@EnterTheSoundscapeperfectly said
plus it's actually Take-Two's greed
the original Rockstar doesn't exist anymore
After Assassins Creed Mirage releases I wanna see a comparison b/w AC Origins vs Mirage because the environment feels very similar!
I'll probably do a valhalla comparison. Origins is old now and they made a lot of technical improvements since then
@@Nick930 yah that's great too!
@@Nick930 yep especially the walking animation
dang, its 2010 game but still hold up to this day
While the sound design is the same, you can hear more directionality in the PS5 version, and I think this has to do with how the 3D Audio processor handles the directionality of sounds.
Wow, if there's anything I look for, it's more directionality in my 13 year-old PS3 games
You should do a comparison with the xenia emulator as well. I'm playing it now on the emulator and it looks crisp. Emulation has really come a long way.
With all the insane money they made from GTA V you would have thought they would have poured a bit more effort into it. But I guess given the other older GTA "Remasters" I'm not surprised they re-rendered the game in 4k and are selling it.
Rockstar outsourced this port. I'm sure they are focused on GTA 6
@@kuruptzZzI hope they do something different. If I get a "chase this guy down on a motorcycle" and "read a map for 5 hours" mission again, I'm gonna throw the console through a window.
I’m glad they didn’t touch the models and textures. Smart to stay true to original design but just make it look better
Rdr1 is still a really impressive game being able to run on a ps3, then rdr2 came and basically changed how graphics, small details and open world games can be, it's very impressive what games are becoming nowadays, most are getting to the point people think the game is real life
That god awful wanted system though... just awful
It is now at 60fps
Red Dead Redemption still looks fantastic after thirteen years.
Yet people complain the port has no graphical enhancements when it clearly doesn't need any.
@@Tutankamion196 A 60fps option would've been appreciated at least, as well as a port to PC
@@Tutankamion19660fps it is indispensable
Fantastic? Thats a big stretch lmaoo it looks good at best but releasing it on 2023? It looks like complete ass
@@tilakgurung8629 Compared to modern day games perhaps, but it looks fantastic by itself, especially for a game so old.
Update so good you really have to point out what’s different
Are you making a mortak kombat comparison
I really have no idea what happened to Rockstar (but actually it's take 2 fault)
No it's rockstar's fault as well!
what does Take 2 have to do with it??
@@amemename the Take Two CEO is the money hungry Strauss Zelnick... who said that the pricing was "commercially accurate" so according to Strauss Zelnick RDR1 is worth $50... Take Two are the ones who wanted micro-transactions in GTA 5...
Oh I htought you meant the game "it takes two" lol... @@samjmk3029
The OG Medal of Honor should get a remake but have everything kept the same as it was in the original, but better graphics and polygons and all that good stuff
This. Just extended LOD and modern controls, the rest isn't needed. That OST will be butchered though, I'm sure of it.
you can do that with a ps1 emulator and plugins.
@@kingjoe3rd Better LOD? I know you can force better geometry perspective with GTE hacks but actually enhance draw distance and LOD? And mouse inputs aren't that great with that plugin, to be fair.
Is this improvement purley down to operating speed?
i feel like people are saying this is a bad port purely because it's rockstar, but the only issue I see here is the price. if it were 20 to 30 bucks it would be cool, but i see some major improvements like image quality and fps
To be fair I sometime enjoy " Raw Ports" of classic games that were a huge part of my childhood/teen years while other time I rather get a Remake. In this case I like the fact they kept it Raw. But can see them making a remake later with build from the ground up textures, graphic, models, and map rescaling
One of the laziest ports of all time
Its just a port for PS4, no remaster, no PS5 release (only a playable PS4 Game)
@@Notizblatt yeah it's just a port that costs 50 bucks
@@Notizblattwrong, it says ps4 pro enhanced in the Playstation store. So its not just a port.
@@yuranabdul7081 I dont want to defend that, but its normal these days
No that goes to Silent Hill HD collection
If only you waited a little longer to compare this game, because they released a 60fps patch just a couple months later.
Still 30 fps? Does the xbox backwards compatibility have more fps?
Atleast what I would have wish they added was the ability to wear Arthur’s hat. Right below the Golden Guns setting in the options there would be an Arthur’s Hat option you can toggle on and off and it would simply replace your hat on all outfits that have hats with Arthur’s and the textures downscaled a bit to match the first game. I think that would be a great nod to the second game.
You expect FAR too much from R*/take two. Keep in mind, this port is ONLY $50, after all!
I would have loved if they just added RDR to RDR2. New Austin is there and they could have added it as a DLC or something. Wishful thinking, I know.
i know peaple wanned a remasterd but i am still happy that i can play one of my fav games on a modern console so idc that it is “just a port”
Fans have wanted a remaster of RDR1 for a long time or a remake as an end game DLC for RDR2. I really don't understand why they couldn't just take the audio of the characters from the first game and utilize it for the second option listed.
Played through a lot on switch and overall my biggest gripe is the game still has a lot of bugs and glitches not common enough to ruin it but enough to notice and most of them i remember from the PS3 version and in terms of technical specs 60FPS would have been nice but tbh a further draw distance would be nice also was kind of dissatisfied about that in PS4/5 version draw distance is great but was hoping since was so old we would have essential high quality assets always loaded
I need Max Payne 3 on PS4/5.
Man, that's a good game.
Max Payne 1 & 2 need a port much more. On PC they run into framerate issues on newer hardware.
Definitely going to buy it but not for $50 maybe 20 or 30
I've been trying to find an answer to this question but no one can answer it and I can't find the answer anywhere online and my question is is there an online playable version to this on PS5 like there was PS3 or is there not
Could you imagine a full remake of this game though? Gosh I love the first RDR. I love the second one too, but there’s just something about a true western tale that the second game can’t quite seem to capture.
Even better, can you imagine them just actually making a Red Dead 3 for PS5? That's how it used to work.
@@ko7577 what does this comment even mean. like, they are making a third red dead. it just isn't out yet
All the effort to port RDR2 to a dying outdated handheld (switch) and not bringing it to PC just absolutely blows my mind. What is in these game files that rockstar is so afraid of that they won’t just port it to PC…..