THE END OF THE PREMIER LEAGUE!
Vložit
- čas přidán 29. 04. 2024
- The Premier League have voted to make a huge change to the spending power of the big clubs. Is it too Draconian and could it destroy the league? Mark Goldbridge has his say on the latest football news.
- Sport
Am I the only one thinking Mark completely missed the point here? The current system isnt sustainable and the other leagues arent spending anything near close to what Premier league clubs are spending.
yeah, premier league teams in particular are inflating prices in football way too much. I think it'll be good for the economic stability of the industry
Yep he is a hyperbolic click baiter.
Real spends like 800 mil a year on these matters. So the english top clubs are now around half of what the spanish top clubs are in spending power. This is not a transfer budget. It Transfer, Salary, Agents fees, Staff Salary. This is a massive massive cap on the league, Real already spend 40 mil more on wages a year than City who is the top english wage spender so do Bayern so you are also just lying.
Yep, you're the only one. 🤭
@@wankerflaps Yup and this is how Rashford gets a $100M price tag. It's crazy how inflated the English players' market values are. It's not sustainable
You should be happy, surely United wouldn't risk throwing 100m at a player like Antony again
Why does Man Utd always spend a lot of money on shitty players ??😂😂😂
@@iam_kxylee Well to be fair they also spend a lot on good players like Casemiro. Not saying that it was a good deal. United just throws out money like it's nothing.
@murasame1450 Personally, I think Manchester United overpaid on Casimero for the length of contract!!
@@iam_kxylee called having John Murtough and Richard Arnold as recruitment. They’re bankers, didn’t have a clue what they were doing.
@@davidsaville5239 Yeah, I said it was not a good deal they made, but they still got a good player out of it.
If city are against it you know its good
Ain’t that the truth
115 Charges FC
Wrong. This will destroy the league.
And Uniturd
@@iam_kxyleecry
If city votes no, i vote yes, simple
I couldn't agree more if 115 says no then we should say yes
@@alfiemorris2282 but united said no aswell lol
lol United said no too dummie
Haha what a 🤡
@@MC-ie8xl United were city before city dominated the league of course they gonna say no they want their glory back
Missing the point entirely. Newcastle (your example) can’t dramatically increase spending because the % of income overrides the anchoring.
Correct
this is undeniably a good thing mark. i think you’re just a bit scared United are going to get left behind now they can’t outspend smaller clubs
Exactly!!!!
And he's scared Prem will lose their FAKE top spot
You'd think united fans would be all for it with the amount of money they've wasted on bang average players 😂
No he's scared City have already spent enough so it doesn't matter now City will win every year because no club can come close to their spending,
Might help them by accident. Maybe stop buying 80 million pound dogshit players like Antony lol
Clubs against spending cap:-
City, United and Villa
What was Villa planning to do? 😮
Villa has are hella rich. They get in the top 4 consistently and they will spend big.
@@atikurrahman9304they can’t tho cos of ffp. They are literally in the same position as us (Newcastle) We have owners who want to spend big but can’t
U do know villa have one of the richest owners in world football 😂
U do know Newcastle have the richest? More than the prem combined 😂
@@DomNUFC990the new rulse are replacing ffp
He’s just obsessed with Man City
But yet he Claims he doesn’t care about city
Obviously. There was no issue when Man U was dominate.
Mark, you cant moan about the PL being uncompetitive and boring last week and then moan about this which will bring every team closer together. This is a brilliant move.
Also the limits which will be set will still be more than 99% of European clubs can afford so i dont see the PL being outspent
He just does it for the views. Do not trust this guy😂
If the new system is implemented it will give city and some other clubs the extra incentive to leave and join the super league
Do you know the meaning of moaning?
@@paulorganisation1do you?
@@YodaSkywalkerstop them then? Why do you act like they can’t do anything the prem could ban them if they do that plus the uk government is pssinh a law that would stop clubs from joining a super league.
This is the boring side of football that's very important
Man U's biggest problem is that they waste shed-loads of cash on duff players.
True
Duff beer
Duff beer ha
Delete this Mark, seriously because you’ve reported it completely wrong, Newcastle won’t be able to spend more than 85%. For a man who bigs himself up for integrity this is really egregious
He doesn’t have an actual clue it’s hilarious and all the plastic fake United fans clammed and agree with him 😂
The worst part is there’s people who believe everything he says like gospel even though he has no clue about anything
Isnt the 85% rule only applicable to clubs in UEFA competitions?
If a massive club like Liverpool agreed? Then im not bothered about man utd in the mud and tinpot man city overspending as usual .Then im with the other teams including spurs, west ham etc! This was needed
@@mymemories925 because John Henry wants to pocket extra cash dividends out of club.
European clubs on average spend less than midtable and even some relegation clubs in England. So this only hurts the biggest clubs really and is a massive help to the other 99% of clubs. I didn't expect a United fan to want it so not surprised your overreacting like this
The problem here is that you are gonna be losing out on big players. City now now have around half the spending power of Real because of this cap.
@WistiPurpleday again it seems like only City and United would be adversely affected. Everyone else either nothing changes or its a big help, unless you think teams should spend more than 400 million per window
Wouldnt this corrupt the Premier League even more in the eyes of other leagues? The only reason the Prem is seen as the best league in the world now is because they have so much money and spending power, so all they do is buy the best talents from other leagues and so on. With the new system, more clubs will be able to spend more money, only adding fuel to the fire no? Now instead of only the top teams throwing money around, the majority of the league will have that ability.
It won't benefit the smaller clubs when they spend way more than they can afford and they start going bust. Then everyone will be crying.
@@Hello-wy2px the premier league is corrupt to the bone, what are you on about? where there is big money, there is corruption and that's why you never seen any scandals in bundesliga like you've seen in serie a, premier league and laliga
Didn’t bother UTD fans what they had the best Manager, best squad, biggest revenue and bought all the best players! Hypocrites!!!
The question isn't "why are these fans for or against it?", the question is "should all fans be for or against it?" Some people will be in favour of unfair things that benefit them. So what? Who cares? How does that get us anywhere closer to the truth?
UTD didn't do 115...
We earnt it,didn't buy it!🤬👹
@@IR17171717has to be the most pointless comment ever!
Hate them but United earned it!!!
I support anything that makes the game fairer and stops clubs buying or cheating their way to success.
Like the Ferguson era?
@@samuelkoomson6017 How?
@@samuelkoomson6017how did you get that from what he said? Most of us including me want football to be fair. I don't want a ref to not give fouls and cards because "he's trying to keep his hands in his pockets" only to the have the get get out of hand and begin to give out ridiculous cards. I want decisions to be fair even if it goes against my club. I want there to be something like goal line technology for throw ins and corners and often those decisions are wrong and we all know a corner often leads to a goal. I also don't want teams taking the Mick with shell companies over paying players and managers (and likely refs) so one team completely takes over. Some of the best games are small teams Vs each other. Its sport, it's meant to be fair and it's being ruined by money in many different areas.
@@samuelkoomson6017 I'm not a Utd fan however, I am a football fan. We need a league where ALL teams have a chance to win titles and trophies and to qualify for European competitions. All we get now is City winning virtually everything every single season and the bottom teams taking it in turns to get relegated and this shows something is wrong. No team should be winning the title every season.
arsenal fan 😂😂😂
The fact this guy is saying £450m isn't enough is scary. 99% of the other clubs in the world can't spend a 10th of that
You missed the point: The current FFP will continue as is, but the anchoring will come into effect only for the clubs have very high revenue. This will have no implication for clubs like Newcastle or Brentford, only Man. City and perhaps Man. United as of now. The % of revenue will still limit the spend for all other clubs.
Completely correct. He needs to make another video correcting this one.
Absolutely correct
He works for talksport are you surprised he's spreading false information?
This will have implications on clubs like Brentford as they will now be able to spend 85% of their revenue.
@@calinho7689 My point is that the anchoring rule will only have an effect on Man. City's and (perhaps) Man. United's spending. The 85% rule will be what will limit other clubs' spending.
Nobody complained during the Man U or Arsenal eras of dominance.
Why would they?
Self-sustaining clubs.
Arsenal have never been dominant, never won the league back to back and never won the champions league.
@@joebarnes100arsenal were the first team to the win the league three times in a row in the 1930s
@@goonerboz6023 I don't think the original comment was referring to the 30s.
@@joebarnes100 you said they never won the league consecutively I was just pointing out you were wrong that's all
It's called a salary cap just like the NFL.
And premiership rugby
No it is not. This is how much you can spend on transfers. "Salary" cap. Is how much you can give players in "salary" hench the name salary cap.
@@WistiPurpleday Its not that either. Its spending entirely, on wages, agent fees, transfers etc. Its spending as a whole, not on just one particular aspect.
@@dylthomas1005 it kinda is
@@WistiPurpleday Are you upset by it?
We desperately need a salary cap to help out the smaller and the promoted clubs to survive in the PL.
And to make the whole competition more competitive. In theory this would make the prem even more exciting in the long run. I see the biggest issue in the big clubs potentially leaving the prem for a super league.
Will Mark ever stop crying about City? No. If it was United winning 6/7 leagues you would not be crying about them.
Good luck to the clubs with stupidly high wages
The new limit applies per year to football related wages + agents fees + player transfer amortisation, not what they can spend every summer as you initially said. Not just players either, mangers & coaching staff also included.
it’s not the end of the premier league because smaller clubs get a chance to compete against the bigger clubs and be up there fighting for europe and maybe the league
It's the end of your huge financial cheating against the true authentic leagues ..Now the leagues with legit integrity will rise up and even more with the new champions league money
@@Triple_X_Xhere AGAIN!! Do you watch every single channel that covers English football??
@@Triple_X_X im not man city fan mate im a burnley fan so you saying burnley are financially cheating?
@@GIBBO4182i can sense the fear in your voice .. You're scared of Prem losing its FAKE top spot
That's the theoretical story of corruption. Real practice is that big clubs are getting stronger.
Fixing PGMOL is the first priority, PGMOL is the only thing killing EPL now
We need to take off city from pgmol
@@nicklasaxelsson71like the Ferguson era?
@@samuelkoomson6017 Exactly. Both of them lmao.
We just need to remove city from the epl then everything would be better
It clearly isn't, the economic model of the Prem isn't sustainable.
I remember ferrari complaining over the f1 spending caps
Yeah well, if you have infinite money and still can’t win, maybe just let it happen right.
How did this end for them?
And still formula 1 is dominated by a single constructor, Red Bull. So this certainly isn‘t the solution to all problems.
Odd seeing chelsea abstain and Villa against it...
FFP isn’t working as it is. Glad to try something new
Just scrap it all
@@kirkham111then Man City and Newcastle just outspend everyone and win everything
@@GIBBO4182United and Chelsea have out spend everyone what have they won.😂
@@alexchoo7190 😂😂😂 cooked
@@alexchoo7190 this would potentially be outspending teams by an astronomical amount. Not £200-300m over a decade
This is just a way of stopping City from being annihilated by the 115. Brush it under the rug with new shiny rules.
Yep, i thought the same. But they still voted against it.
not even close - it will help reign overspenders like city and manu
No but ok
@@TWOScottRage Easy to vote against something you know is going to pass and you are in the minority. Adds to the facade that they are against it when in reality, they will get to spend millions when the rules are applied to them as Mark mentioned in the video.
the dirty cheats will get away with it!!
I live in the US and am a Man U fan, this is a great thing. Never understood the goal of mid table teams like Brentford/Bournmouth who can never get European football. This helps with parity and makes the league more interesting
do not turn football into nfl!! nfl clubs just move location if they want 😂😂😂 ridiculous! u probably want a tv break every 2 minutes and everyone has to wear marshmallow suits n helmets
Thats actually decreses the chance of a super league Mark. The only way the SL can gain support is if prem clubs continue buying every talent from all the leagues and the fans get fed up with it. PL basically have to do this and put a leash on its clubs to stop the SL from gaining popularity.
Mark is just upset that his new Sugar Daddy at United can't spend huge. Claims to be a football commentator of the people but was completely wet at the idea of Qatar taking over his club.
They can spend 400 million a year, that’s a ton of money
FFP hasn’t worked! Something had to change
Spending isn’t just about transfers, it includes wages, rent, all the costs of a club
Isak owns van de ven
The proposal doesn't work because Premier League clubs aren't competing solely against other Premier League clubs. They also compete in International Competitions. Here in the states, NFL clubs are only competing against other NFL clubs.
It ruins the experience for fans. Majority of fans root for larger clubs. It really blows to see your club have the potential to do more but is stunted. Also how your larger club brings in more viewership and the smaller clubs benefit from that already.
This is good because it could force the top clubs to share more TV revenue with the bottom clubs. This also makes the Championship more valuable. The other leagues are so top heavy that it won’t help them at all.
People are paying more to watch it on TV disgusting
So the top clubs put in more work to bring in more revenue, it is a genius idea to punish hard work 😂 decades of work so bournmouth fans don't get their feelings hurt.
How about we force your parents and you to donate half of your income to homeless people?
@@alphamale3692 why would we do that when they would use it for drugs
You missed the point bro
I support liverpool, and if it makes competition closer, that's great. Pointless teams spend most money wins, not a sport.
I would break away and make a super league if I was a big club 😮
Finally the league will be more competitive and the so call big club cant bully the small clubs.
If any club want to be competitive, will need top manager and best recruitment team
😂😂😂
Delete this comment 😂😂😂
@@obinnamadichie maybe u dont know how market works dude.
At the moment so call small teams can't spent more because of FFP. Look at the newcastle, richest club in EPL but they still can't spent because of restrictions where as clubs like united Arsenal city can spent without any issue.
So if from next season spending cap remain fixed for all the clubs, then clubs like everton, forest, villa, newscastle will burn cash too without the worry of point deductions.
I like the idea because it makes the league a lot more competitive. The big problem is all the best players wouldn't come to the Premiership. So all of a sudden we wouldn't be competitive in Europe anymore.
Where would they go? No one else can realistically compete
@@StrikeBolteafc ...If wages significantly dropped in England they'd obviously go abroad to clubs offering more and it wouldn't need to be the ridiculous levels we have now if there was a huge drop in England.
@@rael1999 that doesn’t answer my question what clubs would be able to compete
@@StrikeBolteafc Saudi!!!
@@dhirshg true but that affects every European league not just the prem. also do you think Saudi will realistically pass the prem? They have bought lots of players yet with they still aren’t that popular. They are the biggest in Asia not doubt but won’t be able to compete with the European teams
The problem is when qualification to European football, it is really complicated you are capped even more
He didn’t mind when Utd dominated.
As a Liverpool fan it doesn’t really affect me much tbh, we won’t be spending 300M on bench warmers every season, it’s a W for me🤷🏾♂️
Completely misunderstood what is being proposed. The revenue cap will be applied first, clubs will not be able to spend more regardless of the anchor.
This rules change won't hurt Man City much at all, Man City already don't spend the most on transfers and still win due to being a better run club, with a better manager and better team set up. Arsenal, Man Utd and Chelsea have all spent more than City over the last 5 years etc.
The thing is his supporters here mostly Liverpool fans are just delusionally obsessed with City because of repeatedly falling short of them..they don't realise Utd's have actually spent more and taken the most advantage since the 90s and if Utd finally get it right through wasting so much money it will be them and City competing just like 2012,2013 and 2018 with Liverpool and Arsenal no were near.
better run club ahhhhh 😂😂😂 wtf u been smoking? everything city has achieved last few years is from cheating!! dirty scumbags!! and u acting like is from being well run 😂😂😂😂
I don't remember the squwarking and belly aching between 1993 and 2010. I wonder what has changed
Spending cap = more dividends for owners and share-holders. I’d rather as much money stays within the game as possible.
Its Turkeys voting for Christmas with this anchorage system. The Premier league is going to kill the very best product it helped create with these restrictions. The Americans owners are going to kill our game. Next they will suggest no relegation.
🎯💯👏
This is good it makes the game more competitive
Clubs used to be about supporters being part of something that united them, to play football and other sports. And that's what it should be about. Now its about money, money, money and different philosophies on how to spend it.
It’s always been about money. The “golden age” of serie a in the 90s was full with owners using at as a money laundering scheme. Take of your nostalgia lens and realise it’s always been like this
It's always been about money, you just didn't see it that way back then.
@@Diogo85 You don't know what you are talking about.
@@StrikeBolteafc You don't know what you are talking about.
@@grsmustard9139 explain how then. Enlighten me and don’t just say you don’t know what you are talking about that’s not debunking anything
Mark in the video you rambled on that that isn’t what you would do to change things so what would you do to change things?
Pretty sure this is all leading to Man city getting away with their 115 charges...
Let’s give it go. Better than the current situation.
I'm all for fairness, but City already have the advantage. Their owners have already spent over and above their income, and are now in a position to cash in on that spending. The Premier League have cocked this up again as usual.
What are you talking about? City never spent more above their income, not even once. I dont know where you saw that, but it is clearly false information. Bias toward City by media once again
Yeah blame everything on City..lol
Yes, they need to get done for 115 befire the end of the season. I would say do a rangers on them.
@@jimbo6059 that’s not gonna happen though Man City bring too much money into the league and this is bad for all English clubs competing in Europe
indeed it is I agree. corrupt
will benefit all teams in the long run
If the limit were very low, like $100 million, then it would do more harm than good because clubs wouldn't be able to sign the best players like other countries can. However, if the budget is still big enough for clubs to sign the best players while making the Premier League more competitive, i would be in favor.
Seems people forget that man City having the most money now, is the same as man utd having the most money in the 90's hypocrisy at its finest. Not a City fan!!
Hate them both but you can't compare apples and oranges! City are now actually trying to buy class, history and pedigree - let alone trophies. Laughable. No credibility.
Well that was because United earned their spot. City was just lucky they were bought up by a country.
Mark in all honesty you a hypocrite when man United was I bet u were not complaining man United is a giant if we removed man United the league would be better. If u were I fully agree with currently other wise you just pushing your ego.
If there's a club in the championship or league 1 with a low budget of say 25m, then they manage to get promoted to the prem, does every team have to sell half their squads?
Like, wtf are these stupid rules, the premire league would either have to rapidly change the rules again or purposfully try to stop clubs like that being promoted.
Wouldnt Arsenal & Liverpool also have a higher limit yet they voted it in ? i guess it depends on how classy your club is
Arsenal already have young squad ready to compete and they didnt need spend so much money meanwhile the biggest loser of course its united
This is good for avoiding cheating. However, teams like Burnley and Bournemouth and Wolves can not be completed with Arsenal City and Liverpool because that's stupid, and English teams will struggle to complete in Europe.
Compete!! Sorry to pointed out.
I absolutely love this, the disparity between the clubs will be lessen which is a win for football.
It’s not just Man City that have a leg up over everyone else. For the sake of clarity, just check the squad value/cost and wages for the traditional 6 and compare that to others (who are not allowed to spend to the same level).
Super league? We already have one with the richest 6 clubs competing against one another.
1.4 billion in 2year that is incane revanue for a club
Why not just cap all PL clubs spending to the HIGHEST clubs revenue?? That way owners that want to boost their lower revenue, with their own money, can. It also stops the top revenue clubs getting too far ahead, but they arent being screwed over.
Using the lowest revenue is just stupid. It weakens the PL's most powerful assets.
Yes, as a Newcastle fan it's great news for me, not so much for the Manchester clubs. But the problem is the horse bolted in 2003 when Chelsea went crazy, and again with City in 2008. How much of City's profit, will be deemed invalid when the 115 charges are investigated?
It might be great, it might be terrible but the current situation is not working. So we go down this path, we see how it goes and if we end up with a more competitive PL
When anything is related to Man United, Mark absolutely loses it. he is a great spokesperson when he is neutral and its not about his club. however when man united is in the picture, he just completely becomes contradictory
All clubs should be able to spend what they like.
Basically Mark wants a communist system where everything is equal regardless of merit, as opposed to a capitalist system where good performance and management is rewarded.
Seems to be working just fine in American sports.
This is a good thing i think. Helps the league be more competitive top to bottom.
imagine a man utd fan saying they are fighting with their hands tied behind their back. lol
lets just forget how much arsenal and man utd spend every window
Total spending cap is actually brilliant
Is good for Man U because they spend lots of money for trash players
What about when Manchester United were winning titles
Basically Goldbridge is upset that other teams can spend as much as Man United.
I think we need to remember that although in a normal environment, spending more = better players I actually think this might prompt teams to begin developing players .. too many times we see teams throwing money at their squads only to end up with a bunch of highly priced individuals as opposed to a well functioning team
Good. Stops them overspending! Spend within your means and start having a more competitive league!
450 mil a year on everything football related is really low. Real is allowed to spend like 800. So its not gonna be competitive it gonna make England a worse league. So maybe you are right more competitive because they are making it Italy and will be overtaken by other leagues when they can't keep players soon.
@WistiPurpleday For me, it isn't how much you spend. It's the way in which you spend what you have. And if you haven't got the money, then you sell to buy. That's what we do in the lower leagues, so why can't the so-called elite? You also have your youth academy and your loanees to fill on the bench if you can't buy extra.
@@Chall1spending isn't just transfers. If what Wist said is true then it would make the league more competitive by making the top teams worse. It would be better to have the top teams remain at the level they are at and try to give the teams below more of a chance
@@WistiPurpledaynot they sent where did you get from? They can not spend 800 mil every year
@@StrikeBolteafc That is literally what they are allowed to spend by the spanish rules yes. Read more and talk less about stuff you know nothing about thank you.
115's FAULT
Every owner should spend what they want, as long as the team is clear of any sort of dept.
*This is great news for the Premier League, too much inequality. Obviously fans of the biggest clubs will hate this, because its alot more competition!*
I am a liverpool fan , BLOODY GOOD JOB
I want villa i want burnley too all be given a fair shout .
Its now a farmers league its become like F1 the richer you are the better you are .
Its bollox should be about youth and managers getting tge bedt out if there players
Well said Jamie 👍👏👏👏we want a competitive league not just for the few.
its always been that way you clown
Like when Liverpool were dominating?
@samuelkoomson6017 wasn't entirely financial reasons for domination tho was it ?
Liverpool earnt the right just like utd did in the 90s
Now teams exploit the ruled just like city and Chelsea, small clubs just throwing money left right and centre and although that is happening Liverpool are still competing.
@@jamiehayes5888liverpool spend, stop pretending they're a small club. So delusional 😂
Does City paying off officials come out of their transfer budget?
Its smoke and mirrors, so the city charges get wiped.
even as a City fan i would vote yes !!! Manure need about 2 billion to fix that shambles of a club so that would be 5 years in the making at least. apparently Jim Rattcliffe has went bonkers over it !
I think it's a good idea it means all teams are on an even start. Plus maybe the clubs will reduce ticket prices so its more affordable to go as they don't need as much revenue
Why would teams willingly decrease their revenue if their costs remain the same?
This is crazy we haven't strengthen our team (United) and this rules is coming out now.
Thats absolute madness.
Youve spent 1.4bn 😅
manu have the highest payroll in the EPL
This will become a problem for europian compititions since the premier league will become even more competitive the players burning out will be more, injuries will be more.
As long as 115 FC don't receive punishment, these measures just increase the gap. I guess that was the Premier League's intention tbh.
This is good to be fair. Smaller clubs can buy good players and make the epl stronger
It might acc make the epl weaker coz the best players will go to different leagues as they want to play for the best teams and if the best teams in the epl cant afford them they will move to different leagues
It's idiotic the premier league won't compete with foreign clubs
Also a huge point being missed here is: if all clubs can spend a certain amount based off the bottom club revenue, then let’s say Mbappe or a similar player was available on the market for £200m would he go to Bournemouth or Everton or even Man Utd (lol) or rather go to Liverpool/City/Arsenal? Surely spending is directly correlated to which player is available and which club he prefers to go to otherwise spending over a clubs revenue on overpriced average players will defeat the objective of running a profitable sustainable club and instead would rack up losses? Higher spends need Europe and success to bring in higher revenue but if lower clubs aren’t doing that then it’s a bad financial decision. No wonder the clubs with a brain voted against it 😂
Honest question. Why is it tied to revenue anyway? Surly, a spending cap across the board is the fairest way to do it? Concerns on the impact of other leagues aside, which I don't have an answer for.
Get in the FA are finally trying to stop Manchester City. And the 115 FFP charges are still loading.
But they are not gonna stop Chelsea who have spent a lot more than ManCity? Why? Ooooohhhh wait, they haven’t won as much as we have. Ahhhhhhhhh
@@Dualshock911 If Chelsea want to spend money this summer according to the FFP rules they have to sell players. Don't talk without knowing.
@@Samin-qi8gz sir who’s talking about this summer? We are talking about what all 3 clubs did previous windows NOT THIS SUMMER tf???
@@Dualshock911u have to be one of, no change that, you are the dumbest person i ever seen make comments. as they say, you cant fix stoopid 😂😂
The Toon here we go everyteam should be scared
🙏
😂😂😂😂😂
@@Triple_X_Xwho's your team
@@Jake97xBarcelona and city real plastic
The big problem is not the equality in the EPL, as the league in its entirety has to compete for top players with the Real Madrids, the Juventus, etc. The EPL is not a stand-alone league in comparison to the NFL, MLB, NBA, or NHL. All of those leagues are the preeminent in their respective sports. For soccer, there are a number of top leagues, and they all have to compete with the same basket of elite players. So if spending is going to be curtailed, EPL quality will suffer.
People are missing the point this will be a bad thing long term because it will incentivise the big clubs to agree to a super league and we don’t won’t that this is all planned to push for a super league
@@777abcgaia a fixed top 3 horserace or teams winning the league the teams you mentioned arsenal, Chelsea and united have not won leagues in a while I agree the league is rigged for city but the others nah Chelsea and united ain’t even top 4 😂 and if anything the way arsenal have been playing the last few seasons and improving there young players they do deserve a league title
won't happen because the fan base won't support it
The decision regarding the 115 FFP charges should come before this is implemented, it would be hard to really hold Man City to the charges if this becomes the current legal environment
Can talk about Newcastle next video
Please
I don’t understand how you can complain about city having an amazing team, when united spent even more on terrible players and coaches
Depends how low the limit is set. If its high, big revenue clubs like united will not be very affected and the biggest winners will be rich clubs with low revenue like newcastle, but clubs like brighton, brentford palace would be left in the dust. If the cap is low it will benefit all clubs except the traditional big revenue earners (ie the big 6)
that's actually a W, makes the league more fair
Yes but the Premier league is in the position at the moment where it makes more money than every other league in Europe. If that changes it’s going to be a big problem
The top clubs work harder to bring in revenue that helps the entire league but your idea of fair is to punish them? You have the socialist mind virus that makes zero sense. 😂