You should use your own intellect and read Pawez saheb's books or listen to his lecture, and then it up to you to agree or disagree. Why accept others' views?
Allama sahab was a great scholar of quran and I shall ask everybody to do research on his teachings on utube about his prestigious contribution on islam. He was a true Muslim and patriotic Pakistani and had closed association with Quide Azam. He learnt basic concept of difference between Deen as per quranic terminology and mazhab later become divided into different fiqahs.
Good efforts, kindly make a complete video in Muhammad Sheikh views iipc ,he is great fitna of this era,he denies all devine history as well as Islamic history,denies Muhammad as Muhammad bin Abdullah etc.
Mere doston bhaion......mene aap logo ke comments padhe.... Kya mujhe aap mese 5-6 log bhi ese hein jinhone imandari se mera matlab he apne zehan se apne aqeede firqe aur ulama ke aap par thope gaye khyalat se bahar aakar parvez sahab ke Qurani tarjume aur kutub ka mutaala kiya.... Ye sahab jo maulana se question kar rahe hein in ko bhi sochne ki zaroorat he ke kai baatein aur asal parvez sahab ke aqeede ko unhone ghalat pesh kiya aur koi nahi samjh raha.....parvez sahab ne kahin nahi likha ke allah ka jahan lafz aaya he use duniyavi qanoon samjho..balki unhone kaha he ke har kaam duniya me allah ke kanoon ke tehat hota he yani phusial laws kabhi nahi badalte jise quran me sunnatullah yani allah ki sunnat kaha gaya he....us qanoon se murad he....magar aap log aur ye is tarah quran ko pardh rahe hein jese ek student text book lata he jise us ko samjh na he magar wo key ya guide lakar us me jo likha he us ko sab kuch samjh leta he ....apne kabhi quran me khud ka dimagh aql iste mal nahi ki jab ki quran sekdo jagah aql ka istemal kar ne par zor deta he quran par tadabbur par zir deta he.....
jazakAllah Khair brothers. Bohat sary sawalon k jawaab mil gae alhamdulillah. Very informative session. Allah ap dono ko behtareen jaza e Khair ataa farmae.
Mere doston bhaion......mene aap logo ke comments padhe.... Kya mujhe aap mese 5-6 log bhi ese hein jinhone imandari se mera matlab he apne zehan se apne aqeede firqe aur ulama ke aap par thope gaye khyalat se bahar aakar parvez sahab ke Qurani tarjume aur kutub ka mutaala kiya.... Ye sahab jo maulana se question kar rahe hein in ko bhi sochne ki zaroorat he ke kai baatein aur asal parvez sahab ke aqeede ko unhone ghalat pesh kiya aur koi nahi samjh raha.....parvez sahab ne kahin nahi likha ke allah ka jahan lafz aaya he use duniyavi qanoon samjho..balki unhone kaha he ke har kaam duniya me allah ke kanoon ke tehat hota he yani phusial laws kabhi nahi badalte jise quran me sunnatullah yani allah ki sunnat kaha gaya he....us qanoon se murad he....magar aap log aur ye is tarah quran ko pardh rahe hein jese ek student text book lata he jise us ko samjh na he magar wo key ya guide lakar us me jo likha he us ko sab kuch samjh leta he ....apne kabhi quran me khud ka dimagh aql iste mal nahi ki jab ki quran sekdo jagah aql ka istemal kar ne par zor deta he quran par tadabbur par zir deta he.....
Last messenger Rasool ALLAH & companions believed in Allah's DEEN, so did IBRAHIM, Ismael,Ishaq,Yaquob & Asbat. So did Moses,Isa @ all the Messengers of Allah. We don't differentiate between them. Ale IMRAN V 84.Allah DEEN is complete & safe in Quran. Allah has taken full responsibility to safeguard Quran till last day of humanity on earth. Every thing else is forged by the MUNAFIQ Zoroastrians. they changed Allah's Deen in to madhib.
Haq ko log kabhi nahi pehchan sakte......yahi log zalim he ... Parvez sahab ki haqqaniyat ko ese mulla kabhi nahi samjh sakte ye quran ko key yani kunjion se padhnewale hein.....
Dr. Sb you said the passion of sir Syed with prophet PBUH was like a normal Muslim. I object this point as normal Muslim of today’s world will not do such efforts like to sell his house to defend writing against prophet PBUH.
Very needed information. Totally agree. There is a person who is supporter of pervez. His question regarding mojazaat is: as Quran is a source for every muslim, what inspiration/motivation do we get from these? If Allah mentions these mojazaat, what motivation do we get today?
Thanks Dr saab for so much detailed information on sir syed ahmed khan and parveeziat. And I liked that how you told everything good or bad about them. We need more people on social media like you thanks again
Mere doston bhaion......mene aap logo ke comments padhe.... Kya mujhe aap mese 5-6 log bhi ese hein jinhone imandari se mera matlab he apne zehan se apne aqeede firqe aur ulama ke aap par thope gaye khyalat se bahar aakar parvez sahab ke Qurani tarjume aur kutub ka mutaala kiya.... Ye sahab jo maulana se question kar rahe hein in ko bhi sochne ki zaroorat he ke kai baatein aur asal parvez sahab ke aqeede ko unhone ghalat pesh kiya aur koi nahi samjh raha.....parvez sahab ne kahin nahi likha ke allah ka jahan lafz aaya he use duniyavi qanoon samjho..balki unhone kaha he ke har kaam duniya me allah ke kanoon ke tehat hota he yani phusial laws kabhi nahi badalte jise quran me sunnatullah yani allah ki sunnat kaha gaya he....us qanoon se murad he....magar aap log aur ye is tarah quran ko pardh rahe hein jese ek student text book lata he jise us ko samjh na he magar wo key ya guide lakar us me jo likha he us ko sab kuch samjh leta he ....apne kabhi quran me khud ka dimagh aql iste mal nahi ki jab ki quran sekdo jagah aql ka istemal kar ne par zor deta he quran par tadabbur par zir deta he.....
aaj agar west mein Hazoor ki shaan koi gustakhi karta hai tu iska mawadd inneh hadees ki kitabon se laita hai jo Islam k dushmano ne Hazoor ki wafat k 250 saal baad jhot sach mila k likhein thein laikin inn kat mulaon ki samjh mein yeh baat aana bohat mushkil hai
Sahabah very much aware of arabic semantic enrichment , and other after them were not. For example; Sahabah aware of difference between the word fial and amal
I like your approach and politeness though i disagree with you on many things. Comments are disabled for your lecture khilafat wo malookeyyat by Molana Modoodi. It speaks a volume itself, self explanatory and depicts many things.
Salaam what's about Madudi and Dr Israr as both were not taken Hadees in practice seriously. Also comments on Madudi Tafseer. Their believers are seem not take hadees seriously in their lives. Pl explain.
,ڈاکٹر صاحب اپ نے غلظ بیانی سے کام لیا ھے اک مرحوم کے پیٹ کے پیچھے غلط بیانی سے کام لیا مرحوم پرویز صاحب نے کہیں بھی احادیث کے ماننے سے انکار نھیں کیا انکیکتاب معراج انسانیت کا مطالعہ کیجئے اور یہ تہمت لگائے مرحوم ضعیف احادیث کو نکال دینا چاہئے اور بہت ہی بکواس کیا ہے اپنے کاذبوں پر الله کی لعنت ہو .اپنے جھوٹ کا بازار گرم کر رکھس ہے مڈید چھان بین کیجئے مندید شرمندگی سے بچ جاوگے اپ مذہب پرست ہیں دین قبول کرلو اپکی عینک کھل جائگی.
اختلاف رائے میں انصاف اور سچائی کو ھر صورت غالب نظر آنا اھم ھوتا ھے۔ آج اسلام کا اصل نظام کہاں نافض ھے جسکی مثال دی جاسکے۔ اور کون سے مکتب فکر کو درست اسلام سمجھا جائے۔ جو نظام رسول صلعم اور صحابہ راشدہ نے چھوڑا وہ کب اور کہاں اور کس جہد سے نافض ھوگا۔ کبھی اس پر بھی روشنی ڈال دیں۔ آج اسباب زوال امت کیوں ھے۔ آج مسلم کی آواز و حیثیت کیا حقیقت ھے۔ اس پر کچھ فرمائیں۔ شکریہ۔
السلامُ علیکم، سر سید احمد خان صاحب کے بارے میں علماء حضرات سے جتنی بھی باتیں ہم نے پڑھیں اور سُنیں و سب منفی تھیں، اس ویڈیو کو دیکھنے کے بعد یہی کہونگا کہ یہ برسوں کے مطالعے کا پھل ہے، انداز گفت و شنید بہت ہی اچھا ہے،
Aaj ki dunya main Allama Ghulam Ahmed Parwaiz aur Sir Syed Ahmed Khan jaisay Mufaqreen Qurran maine nahin daikhay unhain samajhnay keliae mazeed study ki zaroorat he
Ab tak toh main ye samajhta tha ke ye log hadees ko is liye nahin maante kyon ke inko lagta hoga ke saare hadeeson ko gadha gaya hai aur verify karna mushkil hai ke kya sahi hai kya daef hai kya maudu hai aur ye log is liye Qur'an ko sirf follow karne ko kahte hongey kyon ke Qur'an me aisa karna mumkin nahin lekin mujhe toh ye pata hi nahin tha ke inka ye sab aqeedah tha aur ye log nabi s.a.w ke sunnat ka hi inkaari then...yaani ke ye mainey nahin rakhta ke hadees 100% saccha hai , Nabi s.a.w ne sach me aisa kaha ya karne ka hukm dia balke inka ye maanna tha ke Nabi s.a.w us waqt ke haaqim then us waqt unko ko follow karna tha ab jo haakim hoga woh quran ka tafseer karega aur inko follow karna deen hoga aur Qur'an ko science define karega agar science ke mutaabik koi baat hoga toh theek warna quran ko science ke daanche me dhaalna hoga... Mera ye sawaal hai ke kya ye kufr nahin? Kya sirf Ghulam Ahmed qadiani kaafir tha? Usne toh inke jaisa kaam nahi kia balke ulta nabi s.a.w ke hadeeson ko apne nabuwat ka daawa karne me istemal kia mehndi a s isaa a s khud ko bataya . Dekha jaaye toh ye sabhi log ek hi jaisey hain.
Baten inki kahi hui sari thek hain.......................Pervez Sahab k according Quran Pak ka kisi bhi dosri zaban mein translation mumkin nahi............Aur aesa krne par hi problems create hoti hain.............Arabic linguistic mein vide range of meanings hain alfaaz k......................So Pervez Sahab ne meaing liye arabic linguistic se ...................Wo inke apni traf se ni liye hue nahi.................Lekin ye ab kon btae k konsa meaning kis jaga fit ata hai................................Arabic linguistic mein "Camel" Oont k liye 70 se zyada alfaaz hain...............Bs yehi hua hai k unho ne meaning jis hisab se uthae wo mafhoom change kr gae Quranic Verses ka....
Hazrat Musa kay qissay main mudo jazar nahi shayed Tsunami thi jis main pehlay samandar peechay hat ta hay aur phir bari lehron ki sorat main sahil sai takrata hai. Allah knows best.
These past personalities including Ghulam Ahmed Pervaiz and to some extent Ghamedi Sahab too should not be followed No and emphatic NO as they Talk in a manner which shows they are Hadith rejectors and create doubts in our minds such as the miracle of Hazarat Musa of separation of the sea at the time of
Maulvis will follow pervez soon as Ghamidi has started following him. Further the atheist are now attacking Islam and there's only way to defeat them is the sir Syed and pervez fikar.
Allama Perwez was a genius, one has to read his work to understand what is he trying to say. His concept about Hadees is," Any hadees conflicting with the teachings of Quran and any hadees which reflects badly on the character of Rasool Allah Sallallah u Allaihe Wassallam and his Sahaba Karam cannot be a true hadees." This is not Inkar e hadees! This is a biased and incorrect interview not based on facts, I request you to please read yourself to understand him. As for their Fatawas against him, there are more Fatawas issued by each of them against each other.
محترم! پرویز یا فکر پرویز کے خلاف آپ جو بھی گوھر افشانی فرمانا چاہیں۔اور انکار حدیث کے نام سے اسکے خلاف جو گالی بھی "کوائن" کرنا چاہیں۔کوئی روک نہیں سکتا ۔لیکن اسلام یا اسلامی نظام ۔بطور نظام حیات کو جاننے کے لئے ھمارے source یا سر چشمہ آپکے نزدیک کیا ھے ؟ کیا اسکے لئے حتمی اور ٹھوس نشاندہی اپنے اسی چینل پر عنایت فرمائیں گے ۔اور نوٹیفائی بھی فرمائیں گے؟
I really appreciate how well you have put it and the fact that you have mentioned sources as well. JazakAllah.
You should use your own intellect and read Pawez saheb's books or listen to his lecture, and then it up to you to agree or disagree. Why accept others' views?
Allama sahab was a great scholar of quran and I shall ask everybody to do research on his teachings on utube about his prestigious contribution on islam.
He was a true Muslim and patriotic Pakistani and had closed association with Quide Azam. He learnt basic concept of difference between Deen as per quranic terminology and mazhab later become divided into different fiqahs.
Yes I agree with you
Good efforts, kindly make a complete video in Muhammad Sheikh views iipc ,he is great fitna of this era,he denies all devine history as well as Islamic history,denies Muhammad as Muhammad bin Abdullah etc.
Please share links of what this scholar says.
Mere doston bhaion......mene aap logo ke comments padhe....
Kya mujhe aap mese 5-6 log bhi ese hein jinhone imandari se mera matlab he apne zehan se apne aqeede firqe aur ulama ke aap par thope gaye khyalat se bahar aakar parvez sahab ke Qurani tarjume aur kutub ka mutaala kiya....
Ye sahab jo maulana se question kar rahe hein in ko bhi sochne ki zaroorat he ke kai baatein aur asal parvez sahab ke aqeede ko unhone ghalat pesh kiya aur koi nahi samjh raha.....parvez sahab ne kahin nahi likha ke allah ka jahan lafz aaya he use duniyavi qanoon samjho..balki unhone kaha he ke har kaam duniya me allah ke kanoon ke tehat hota he yani phusial laws kabhi nahi badalte jise quran me sunnatullah yani allah ki sunnat kaha gaya he....us qanoon se murad he....magar aap log aur ye is tarah quran ko pardh rahe hein jese ek student text book lata he jise us ko samjh na he magar wo key ya guide lakar us me jo likha he us ko sab kuch samjh leta he ....apne kabhi quran me khud ka dimagh aql iste mal nahi ki jab ki quran sekdo jagah aql ka istemal kar ne par zor deta he quran par tadabbur par zir deta he.....
محمد شیخ کا گھیراؤ ان کے بس کی بات نہیں ، اسکے سامنے جا کر کریں پھر پتا چلے
Jazakillah khyren kaseera allah swt aap sub ki hifazat, frmay ameen
well explained bht shukriya
Why don't you people turn on captions?
jazakAllah Khair brothers.
Bohat sary sawalon k jawaab mil gae alhamdulillah.
Very informative session.
Allah ap dono ko behtareen jaza e Khair ataa farmae.
Mere doston bhaion......mene aap logo ke comments padhe....
Kya mujhe aap mese 5-6 log bhi ese hein jinhone imandari se mera matlab he apne zehan se apne aqeede firqe aur ulama ke aap par thope gaye khyalat se bahar aakar parvez sahab ke Qurani tarjume aur kutub ka mutaala kiya....
Ye sahab jo maulana se question kar rahe hein in ko bhi sochne ki zaroorat he ke kai baatein aur asal parvez sahab ke aqeede ko unhone ghalat pesh kiya aur koi nahi samjh raha.....parvez sahab ne kahin nahi likha ke allah ka jahan lafz aaya he use duniyavi qanoon samjho..balki unhone kaha he ke har kaam duniya me allah ke kanoon ke tehat hota he yani phusial laws kabhi nahi badalte jise quran me sunnatullah yani allah ki sunnat kaha gaya he....us qanoon se murad he....magar aap log aur ye is tarah quran ko pardh rahe hein jese ek student text book lata he jise us ko samjh na he magar wo key ya guide lakar us me jo likha he us ko sab kuch samjh leta he ....apne kabhi quran me khud ka dimagh aql iste mal nahi ki jab ki quran sekdo jagah aql ka istemal kar ne par zor deta he quran par tadabbur par zir deta he.....
Mashallah! very informative
Sir mujhy kuch puchna hai apko call kr skta hu please
ماشااللہ حافظ محمد زبیر صاحب
آپ جو مرزا جہلمی کو عوام کے سامنے ننگا کر رہے ہیں اس سے بہت سے لوگ گمراہی سے بچ رہے ہیں ۔۔جزاک اللہ
اپنے بابا کا دفاع کرتے ہیں کیا،؟
Last messenger Rasool ALLAH & companions believed in Allah's DEEN, so did IBRAHIM, Ismael,Ishaq,Yaquob & Asbat. So did Moses,Isa @ all the Messengers of Allah. We don't differentiate between them. Ale IMRAN V 84.Allah DEEN is complete & safe in Quran. Allah has taken full responsibility to safeguard Quran till last day of humanity on earth. Every thing else is forged by the MUNAFIQ Zoroastrians. they changed Allah's Deen in to madhib.
sir syed seems to be a genius-scholar. i agree with most of his thoughts.
Do we know the difference?
بہت عمدہ گفتگو کی ہے ڈاکٹر صاحب آپ نے سر سید پر❤
جھوٹ بولتا ہے
Informative video
Pervaiz sahab & sir Syed Ahmed two legend
Agreed
Haq ko log kabhi nahi pehchan sakte......yahi log zalim he ...
Parvez sahab ki haqqaniyat ko ese mulla kabhi nahi samjh sakte ye quran ko key yani kunjion se padhnewale hein.....
2 murtad, yaha AMU mein ek ladki ne musalmaan ladkiyon ke hijab nikalwa diye aur fek diye agar wo legend hai fir toh tumne Islam chod diya hai
Baht Acha ham ko samjaya
Dr. Sb you said the passion of sir Syed with prophet PBUH was like a normal Muslim.
I object this point as normal Muslim of today’s world will not do such efforts like to sell his house to defend writing against prophet PBUH.
Well said, that was exactly my point but still; let do a research about his controversial views
@MD NAHID ANJUM Ameen
@MD NAHID ANJUM Kya Dr. saheb ne apni galatiyon ko sudharne ki koshish ki aur kya unhonne in ke liye maafi mangi ?
ڈاکٹر صاحب نے آگے چل کر بم جوپھوڑنق تھا تو شروع میں ایسی گفتگو لازم تھی اور انداز بھی شاہستہ ہونا چاہئے تھا
Hazrt date galat bata rhe hai app 1838/ not 1938
Answer simple as this, Sahabah not aware of philosophy , people after sababah left the way of Sahabah and ran after philosophy
Yeah and that made a lot of firqas
Ghulam Ahmed Pervez was a great scholar.......
😂😂😂,,
Murtad
😂😂😂👎👎👎
جزاك الله خير احسن جزا
Waqt Riwayat Shikan Hai,Aankhain Air Bus Ko Nahin Daikhh Rahien,Hazrat Suleman A.S. K Mojizay Ki Taraqqi Yafta Surat
Jazak allah hu khair
You are great speaker, but without studying books of both Great Scholars
Very needed information.
Totally agree.
There is a person who is supporter of pervez.
His question regarding mojazaat is: as Quran is a source for every muslim, what inspiration/motivation do we get from these? If Allah mentions these mojazaat, what motivation do we get today?
Very good program
اللہ سر سید کو جنت الفردوس میں جگہ دے۔ غلطیاں اپنی جگہ، لیکن مخلص بندہ تھا۔
FIR MUSLIMA KAZZAB KE LIYE BHI DUA KAR DENA🤨
KAMAAL AADMI HO KUFRIYA KALME BAKNE WALE KE LIYE DUA KARNA QURAN NE MANA KIYA HE
Quran badalne pe jannat? Shocked
Thanks Dr saab for so much detailed information on sir syed ahmed khan and parveeziat. And I liked that how you told everything good or bad about them. We need more people on social media like you thanks again
Mere doston bhaion......mene aap logo ke comments padhe....
Kya mujhe aap mese 5-6 log bhi ese hein jinhone imandari se mera matlab he apne zehan se apne aqeede firqe aur ulama ke aap par thope gaye khyalat se bahar aakar parvez sahab ke Qurani tarjume aur kutub ka mutaala kiya....
Ye sahab jo maulana se question kar rahe hein in ko bhi sochne ki zaroorat he ke kai baatein aur asal parvez sahab ke aqeede ko unhone ghalat pesh kiya aur koi nahi samjh raha.....parvez sahab ne kahin nahi likha ke allah ka jahan lafz aaya he use duniyavi qanoon samjho..balki unhone kaha he ke har kaam duniya me allah ke kanoon ke tehat hota he yani phusial laws kabhi nahi badalte jise quran me sunnatullah yani allah ki sunnat kaha gaya he....us qanoon se murad he....magar aap log aur ye is tarah quran ko pardh rahe hein jese ek student text book lata he jise us ko samjh na he magar wo key ya guide lakar us me jo likha he us ko sab kuch samjh leta he ....apne kabhi quran me khud ka dimagh aql iste mal nahi ki jab ki quran sekdo jagah aql ka istemal kar ne par zor deta he quran par tadabbur par zir deta he.....
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad ke afkar p video bnayen
aaj agar west mein Hazoor ki shaan koi gustakhi karta hai tu iska mawadd inneh hadees ki kitabon se laita hai jo Islam k dushmano ne Hazoor ki wafat k 250 saal baad jhot sach mila k likhein thein laikin inn kat mulaon ki samjh mein yeh baat aana bohat mushkil hai
2:25 Shaykh shayad aap 1838 kehna chahte the.?
Mujhe bhi confusion hua
جزاك اللهُ
You never disappointed us Hafiz sb.. Jazak Allah khyr
Ma shaa Allah kamal ki guftago
شیخ آپ لفظ basically بہت استعمال کرتے ہیں جو کان کو گراں گزرتا ہے باقی آپ کی تحقیق کو شوق سے سنتا ہوں
جزاک اللہ خیرا
Barivli movement q nazr ni ati apko?
Sahabah very much aware of arabic semantic enrichment , and other after them were not. For example; Sahabah aware of difference between the word fial and amal
Informative JazakaAllah Sir
I like your approach and politeness though i disagree with you on many things.
Comments are disabled for your lecture khilafat wo malookeyyat by Molana Modoodi. It speaks a volume itself, self explanatory and depicts many things.
Salaam what's about Madudi and Dr Israr as both were not taken Hadees in practice seriously. Also comments on Madudi Tafseer. Their believers are seem not take hadees seriously in their lives. Pl explain.
What do you mean by "seriously"? They treated hadith they way these so called " prophetic sayings" should be treated.
Are you kidding me? Dr israr ahmed ny hadith ko seriously nh lia?
,ڈاکٹر صاحب اپ نے غلظ بیانی سے کام لیا ھے اک مرحوم کے پیٹ کے پیچھے غلط بیانی سے کام لیا مرحوم پرویز صاحب نے کہیں بھی احادیث کے ماننے سے انکار نھیں کیا انکیکتاب معراج انسانیت کا مطالعہ کیجئے اور یہ تہمت لگائے
مرحوم ضعیف احادیث کو نکال دینا چاہئے اور بہت ہی بکواس کیا ہے اپنے کاذبوں پر الله کی لعنت ہو .اپنے جھوٹ کا بازار گرم کر رکھس ہے مڈید چھان بین کیجئے مندید شرمندگی سے بچ جاوگے اپ مذہب پرست ہیں دین قبول کرلو اپکی عینک کھل جائگی.
اور اپکی غلط بیانی دیکھ لیجئے اپ اصحاب کو کبھی قران کافی نہ رہا جبتک اس میں اہل فارس کی امیزش نہ ہوجائے بات بہت دور تک جائگی الله اپکو سمجھ عطء فرماے.
Make a video about the views of ishaq jahalwi
Most of the schoolers , they think one direction, sahabah thought another direction, Sahabah saw the Quran differently, others differently.
اختلاف رائے میں انصاف اور سچائی کو ھر صورت غالب نظر آنا اھم ھوتا ھے۔ آج اسلام کا اصل نظام کہاں نافض ھے جسکی مثال دی جاسکے۔ اور کون سے مکتب فکر کو درست اسلام سمجھا جائے۔ جو نظام رسول صلعم اور صحابہ راشدہ نے چھوڑا وہ کب اور کہاں اور کس جہد سے نافض ھوگا۔ کبھی اس پر بھی روشنی ڈال دیں۔ آج اسباب زوال امت کیوں ھے۔ آج مسلم کی آواز و حیثیت کیا حقیقت ھے۔ اس پر کچھ فرمائیں۔ شکریہ۔
السلامُ علیکم،
سر سید احمد خان صاحب کے بارے میں علماء حضرات سے جتنی بھی باتیں ہم نے پڑھیں اور سُنیں و سب منفی تھیں،
اس ویڈیو کو دیکھنے کے بعد یہی کہونگا کہ یہ برسوں کے مطالعے کا پھل ہے،
انداز گفت و شنید بہت ہی اچھا ہے،
Molana sab ki guftgoo Boht achi ha
Sir Sayyed Ahmed Khan, ke baare mein kahte huve , Refference zarur dete to Achcha hota.
Bout schnitzel bat hai dr zbair great alim mashaallah
Aaj ki dunya main Allama Ghulam Ahmed Parwaiz aur Sir Syed Ahmed Khan jaisay Mufaqreen Qurran maine nahin daikhay unhain samajhnay keliae mazeed study ki zaroorat he
Many things surfaced after 75years of independence...
Seems that Hafiz has not fully comprehended d thoughts of Pervez.
dr sb u legend mashallah
ڈاکٹر صاحب اللہ آپ کو خوش رکھے
Ab tak toh main ye samajhta tha ke ye log hadees ko is liye nahin maante kyon ke inko lagta hoga ke saare hadeeson ko gadha gaya hai aur verify karna mushkil hai ke kya sahi hai kya daef hai kya maudu hai aur ye log is liye Qur'an ko sirf follow karne ko kahte hongey kyon ke Qur'an me aisa karna mumkin nahin lekin mujhe toh ye pata hi nahin tha ke inka ye sab aqeedah tha aur ye log nabi s.a.w ke sunnat ka hi inkaari then...yaani ke ye mainey nahin rakhta ke hadees 100% saccha hai , Nabi s.a.w ne sach me aisa kaha ya karne ka hukm dia balke inka ye maanna tha ke Nabi s.a.w us waqt ke haaqim then us waqt unko ko follow karna tha ab jo haakim hoga woh quran ka tafseer karega aur inko follow karna deen hoga aur Qur'an ko science define karega agar science ke mutaabik koi baat hoga toh theek warna quran ko science ke daanche me dhaalna hoga...
Mera ye sawaal hai ke kya ye kufr nahin?
Kya sirf Ghulam Ahmed qadiani kaafir tha?
Usne toh inke jaisa kaam nahi kia balke ulta nabi s.a.w ke hadeeson ko apne nabuwat ka daawa karne me istemal kia mehndi a s isaa a s khud ko bataya .
Dekha jaaye toh ye sabhi log ek hi jaisey hain.
He was educationalist.
محترم ڈاکٹر صاحب السلام علیکم
مولانا وحید الدین مرحوم نے ندوہ کے مجلس تحقیقات و نشریات اسلام میں کام کیا تھا نیز الجمیعہ میں بھی کام کیا ہے
بات بس اتنی سمجھ میں آتی تو کافی تھا
ان الله على كل شيئ قدیر
Baten inki kahi hui sari thek hain.......................Pervez Sahab k according Quran Pak ka kisi bhi dosri zaban mein translation mumkin nahi............Aur aesa krne par hi problems create hoti hain.............Arabic linguistic mein vide range of meanings hain alfaaz k......................So Pervez Sahab ne meaing liye arabic linguistic se ...................Wo inke apni traf se ni liye hue nahi.................Lekin ye ab kon btae k konsa meaning kis jaga fit ata hai................................Arabic linguistic mein "Camel" Oont k liye 70 se zyada alfaaz hain...............Bs yehi hua hai k unho ne meaning jis hisab se uthae wo mafhoom change kr gae Quranic Verses ka....
It looks both have not read Muqam-e-Hadees
Matlab ka sir syed Ahmed khan ny deen ko bigar diya ha tha Ahmed khan ny buhat noqsan ponchaya Deen ko or Ulady Adam
Hazrat Musa kay qissay main mudo jazar nahi shayed Tsunami thi jis main pehlay samandar peechay hat ta hay aur phir bari lehron ki sorat main sahil sai takrata hai. Allah knows best.
"Ghulam Ahmad Pervaiz was companion of Molana Moudoodi" Are you sure?? I think you are confusing him with Javaid Ahmad Gamidi
total hadees kitni hai hafiz sahib ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
JazakAllah khayr Dr sab
we dont need rational thinking in islam, hasbuna ma wajadna aliha abaana
❤❤❤جزاک الله سرسیداحمد خان vr پرویز صاحب ❤❤❤ خان احمد سراے عالمگیر ❤❤❤
He was pure Atheist...
Sir syed ahmed khan great
عقاید صیح نہیں تھے
Deen ko noqsan
Kaafir
great personality.
tons of love from myside.
MashALLAH 3.JAN.2023
Does Islam allow to declare anybody who has his own views a kafir. It is only Pakistan where it is free for all.
انتہائی برے لگ رھے ھو سو کالڈ ڈاکڑ صاحب
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan musalmanoo ka muhsan tha.
These past personalities including Ghulam Ahmed Pervaiz and to some extent Ghamedi Sahab too should not be followed No and emphatic NO as they Talk in a manner which shows they are Hadith rejectors and create doubts in our minds such as the miracle of Hazarat Musa of separation of the sea at the time of
ہم کافی لوگ ہیں آجکل ان کے lecture u tube میں اب ڈالنے شروع کر دیۓ ہیں اور کافی لوک پڑہ رہے ہیں
14:20
ان کی فکر کی بنیاد خوف قہر برطانیہ عظمی تھی
Tarjman ul Quran is a tafseer commented by Molana Abul Kalam
I listened your Vlog from beginning to end. It is not convincing and arguments are not so strong. A senior citizen.
وہ کہتے تھے کہ اگر کل کو کوئی دلیل کے ساتھ میرے کسی نظریے کو غلط ثابت کردے تو میں حرف کل نہیں ہوں بس
طالبان نے سرسید کےفیزیکل طاقت کے نظریات کو غائب الللہ اور اس کے کلام کو ایمان باللہ کی طاقت سے غلط ثابت کردیا۔
تفسیر کا نام "تفسیر القرآن وھو الھدی والفرقان"ہے نہ کہ ترجمان القرآن
Or Mur tud kisay kehtay he .and you said mufakir
2:24 His father died in 1838
Syed Ahmed khan pr bi prvaizi ki trha fatwa lagny chahyay
Both sir syed and pervezi were badly influenced by english nation
Hadith is not a primary source and it cant be
ڈاکٹر صاحب کی آواز بہت دھیمی ہوتی ہے
Maulvis will follow pervez soon as Ghamidi has started following him.
Further the atheist are now attacking Islam and there's only way to defeat them is the sir Syed and pervez fikar.
Wasay abi aap level ni ghulam ahmad perwez ko softly target krnay ka
Isi ko fitna kehte hain keh log us se mutasir hojate hain.
گذارش ہے کہ علامہ اقبال پر لگے کفر کے فتوے پر بھی روشنی ڈالی جائے۔
No difference between Sir syed Ahmed Khan and Ghlum Ahmed Parviz.Both of them don't believe on Janet and Jahnam and lot of other things.
Allama Perwez was a genius, one has to read his work to understand what is he trying to say. His concept about Hadees is," Any hadees conflicting with the teachings of Quran and any hadees which reflects badly on the character of Rasool Allah Sallallah u Allaihe Wassallam and his Sahaba Karam cannot be a true hadees." This is not Inkar e hadees! This is a biased and incorrect interview not based on facts, I request you to please read yourself to understand him. As for their Fatawas against him, there are more Fatawas issued by each of them against each other.
Hafiz zubair sab ma ap ko 1 pra likha insan smjta ho bahtar tha ap Ahmed khan pr bqaida bat krty ka unho ny deen ko buhat noqsan ponchaya ha
Zahir hai ki aaj ka mulla to jawab nahi de payega lekin aakhrat me in jadid 1028 khudau se pochunga ki wo Qur'an se parvez ko kafir sabit kare
Very well explaind .. Thank you
محترم!
پرویز یا فکر پرویز کے خلاف آپ جو بھی گوھر افشانی فرمانا چاہیں۔اور انکار حدیث کے نام سے اسکے خلاف جو گالی بھی "کوائن" کرنا چاہیں۔کوئی روک نہیں سکتا ۔لیکن اسلام یا اسلامی نظام ۔بطور نظام حیات کو جاننے کے لئے ھمارے source
یا سر چشمہ آپکے نزدیک کیا ھے ؟
کیا اسکے لئے حتمی اور ٹھوس نشاندہی اپنے اسی چینل پر عنایت فرمائیں گے ۔اور نوٹیفائی بھی فرمائیں گے؟
Final result, both sir syed and ghulam pervezi were misguided by their limited knowledge
An innocent question: Have you ever read them?
Agar app thikh Hain to Islam kan nafeez hai
جناب علم حاصل کرو
Masha Allah both of you brothers are excellent presenters. Masha Allah.