Art Quiz 217 - Smells like Fauvism

Sdílet
Vložit

Komentáře • 34

  • @CharuTrivedi
    @CharuTrivedi Před 2 měsíci +6

    Lots of Love from India 💐♥️🥰

  • @Shahmansur786
    @Shahmansur786 Před 2 měsíci

    Love you sir and this art

  • @meikejune4009
    @meikejune4009 Před 2 měsíci +1

    I researched this painting was made by Karl Schmidt- Rottluff. His Aquarell - Paintings are very beautiful an perfect. I know, that beauty is not a creterion of good Art, but nevertheless his Aquarells are very beautiful.

  • @KrishnaGouda-td3si
    @KrishnaGouda-td3si Před 2 měsíci

    You are the best teacher for me love you sir ❤❤

  • @Sid_music
    @Sid_music Před měsícem

    Wouldn’t it be nice to make some videos like this for music too? I am sure you must have heard great pieces of music as well.

  • @georgethomas1994
    @georgethomas1994 Před 2 měsíci +1

    Bildnis Dr Rosa Schapire by Karl Schmidt-Rottluff, made in 1919

  • @user-wv4df5il6j
    @user-wv4df5il6j Před 2 měsíci

    Your method of explanation is very nice ❤🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @PraveenKumar-wq3xd
    @PraveenKumar-wq3xd Před měsícem

    U look like hero in my point of view

  • @erinschlameus3628
    @erinschlameus3628 Před 2 měsíci +1

    made by Karl Schmidt- Rottluff.

  • @Astrophysics.enthusiast01
    @Astrophysics.enthusiast01 Před 2 měsíci

    Love you Sir Walter Lewin

  • @KeithandBridget
    @KeithandBridget Před 2 měsíci

    This from Bridget's art knowledge without google. Dr Rosa Schapire' painted in 1919 by Karl Schmidt-Rottluff

  • @fizikaayselbedelova
    @fizikaayselbedelova Před 2 měsíci

    hello hello hellooo😍❤️

  • @thundershort997
    @thundershort997 Před 2 měsíci +1

    Aoa, Eid ul fitr mubarak to all my muslim brother and sister.

  • @carloshumbertocallejas4027
    @carloshumbertocallejas4027 Před 2 měsíci

    I can't find it's name!
    But surely, there is a serendipity in the air I couldn't smell it on time . Yet the treachery of the language made of different tongues allow me to wonder of my Hyena's.😅

  • @Raj___Agrahari
    @Raj___Agrahari Před 2 měsíci +1

    Class 11 jee student here

  • @seherkasimoglu4596
    @seherkasimoglu4596 Před 2 měsíci +1

    Peter Higgs died. sad. Condolences to the scientific world...

  • @michaelbruning9361
    @michaelbruning9361 Před 2 měsíci

    You've probably seen 2D drawings that have a 3D spatial effect. Can you explain how something like this works?

  • @abulkhayer4898
    @abulkhayer4898 Před 2 měsíci +1

    Sir I am reading in class 9th now....please suggest me what books should I read for Science?....please you suggest.

  • @PainofTheaction
    @PainofTheaction Před 2 měsíci

    Sir can both Net positive and negative charge be induced in case of a conductor, by only using one kind of charge for the induction process? Say if the inducing charge was positive, then if we attach the earthing wire to the negatively polarized side, the excess electrons will flow to the earth, giving us Net Positive charge once (1st, the wire) the inducing charge is removed.. And if we attach the earthing wire to the positively polaized side, then the free electrons from earth will flow towards it, giving us Net negative charge once (1st, the wire) the inducing charge is removed.
    is this possible?
    Edit:
    Sir please allow me to clarify.
    We know that we can charge a body by the method of charging by conduction. So, my teacher taught me that, if we are charging a neutral body by induction, and, if that body is a metal or an ideal conductor, then the charge which we will finally induce onto it will always be of the same magnitude, but of opposite nature, as the charge we used to induce or charge that ideal conductor.
    Let's say the Inducing charge is '+Q'.
    Thus the induced charge will be '-Q'.
    Now, we were also taught the method to achieve such charge by using the method of grounding. If we bring a positively charged rod close to a neutral conductor, then the side closer to the conductor will be negatively polarized, and, the side away from it will be positively polarized.
    Now if we attach a grounding wire, to the side which is away from the positive rod,i.e., which is positively charged, then electrons will flow, from the earth, to the ideal conductor's positive side, to eventually neutralize it, leaving the other side, and the whole conductor, net Negatively charged.
    Once we remove the grounding wire, and then the positively charged rod, the induced negative charge, will spread out uniformly on the surface of the conductor.
    Now essentially, what my query was, is that what would happen, if we, instead of attaching the grounding wire to the positively polarized side of the conductor, what if we attach the grounding wire to the negatively polarized side of the conductor, i.e, closer to positive rod. Will electrons from the earth and grounding wire get attracted and accumulate on the side closer to positive rod.
    [While writing this, I am realising not much would happen. The electrons from the earth and grounding wire cannot move and accumulate to the ideal conductor's side closer to the positive rod, due to repulsion from already accumulated electrons from the (initially neutral) ideal conductor. Also, the electrons from the conductor, can't move into the earth due to the attraction force that they are under via the positive rod]

    • @lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259
      @lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259  Před 2 měsíci

      question unclear

    • @PainofTheaction
      @PainofTheaction Před 2 měsíci

      @@lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259
      Sir please allow me to clarify. We know that we can charge a body by the method of charging by induction. So, my teacher taught me that, if we are charging a neutral body by induction, and, if that body is a metal or an ideal conductor, then the charge which we will finally induce onto it will always be of the same magnitude, but of opposite nature, as the charge we used to induce or charge that ideal conductor.
      Let's say the Inducing charge is '+Q'.
      Thus the induced charge will be '-Q'.
      Now, we were also taught the method to achieve such charge by using the method of grounding. If we bring a positively charged rod close to a neutral conductor, then the side closer to the conductor will be negatively polarized, and, the side away from it will be positively polarized.
      Now if we attach a grounding wire, to the side which is away from the positive rod, i.e., which is positively charged, then electrons will flow, from the earth, to the ideal conductor's positive side, to eventually neutralize it, leaving the other side, and the whole conductor, net Negatively charged.
      Once we remove the grounding wire, and then the positively charged rod, the induced negative charge, will spread out uniformly on the surface of the conductor(due to repulsion).
      Now essentially, what my query was, is that What would happen, if we, instead of attaching the grounding wire to the positively polarized side of the conductor, What if we attach the grounding wire to the negatively polarized side of the conductor, i.e., closer to positive rod. Will electrons from the earth and grounding wire get attracted and accumulate on the side closer to the positive rod? Can we use the same (natured) charge to charge a neutral body by induction, both negatively and positively?
      [By writing this, I am realising that maybe this can't happen because of the repulsion forces by the already accumulated electrons of the (initially neutral) conductor. Also, the electrons from the negatively polarized side may also not get conducted into the earth because of the attraction force they are feeling due to the positive rod]

    • @lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259
      @lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259  Před 2 měsíci

      @@PainofTheaction I have no idea what you are talking about. In short, you can put + charge and/or neggative charge on any body (metal or not). *However, you can not create + or - charge*

    • @PainofTheaction
      @PainofTheaction Před 2 měsíci

      @@lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259 Extremely sorry sir for wasting your time. I will try to improve my communication skills in English in future because it is not my mother tongue. Also, I just started this chapter of Electric charge and fields so I much likely am speaking gibberish.
      Thank you so much for your time.
      Regards.

    • @lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259
      @lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259  Před 2 měsíci

      @@PainofTheaction key is that you can move charges around in many ways - you can also separate charges in a conductor using polarization. You can charge any one object with ONLY neg or with ONLY pos charges. BUT if you have charged an object with 1.03007 mC *negative* charge, then 1.03007 mC *pos* charge must also be somewhere (maybe on the Moon) but it must be somewhere.

  • @rohit5601
    @rohit5601 Před 2 měsíci

    Sir u have a doubt
    If we take 2 different point charges at a distance of 3m and 1.5 meter is filled with water and rest with air how to calculate electrostatic force between them please explain

  • @teded_2324
    @teded_2324 Před 2 měsíci

    Please adpot me grandpa