Namaskar. I do not know about the horoscope since I am not an astrologer. However, Krishna's leaving his body at the time of flooding and destruction of Krishna's Dwarka, 36 years after the Mahabharata war is consistent with global geology, oceanography, sedimentology, and climatology evidence (5525 BCE). It is also consistent with the Mahabharata war in 5561 BCE (300+ astronomy + multidisciplinary scientific evidence) It is also consistent with Krishna killing Kamsa in 5622 BCE (based on empirically validated evidence of Harivamasha It is also consistent with Krishna being 11 years old (born in 5633 BCE) at the time of killing Kamsa (based on Srimad Bhagavata Purana evidence) It is also consistent with the estimation of Srila Madhvacharya for Krishna's lifetime to be 107 years (5633 BCE - 5525 BCE). Hope this helps.
Hi Nilesh Oak ji! I've been following your work and find it incredibly fascinating. I have a question about your choice of using Voyager 4.5 software over Stellarium. Both software programs offer powerful astronomical features, but I'm curious to know what specifically drew you towards Voyager 4.5. Could you please share your insights on why you prefer Voyager and what advantages it offers in your astronomical research? I'm eager to learn from your expertise. Thank you!
Dr. @NileshOak Namaskar Perhaps things are in not your correct perspective. As I understand she follows classical Indian Astronomy. This implies that there is involvement of the traditional Kali yuga calendar. Obviously, this calendar doesn't sync with your dates. It boils down to 7200 Vs 26000 Hope this helps.
Namaskar 1. It is unjust to take one theory based on certain ref and it's interpretation which is also contradicted by the very text and to call it classical Indian astronomy theory. 2. The specific discussion is about Nakshatra Devatas and planetary positions. This is unaffected by precession theories you are referring to. Hope this helps.
I did a little math, way through/before the big bang and (not buying tbb) and almost tripled the accepted universe timeline. & (God) was still more than light speed away. I'm not built in (sadly) but I know what has been misrepresented to someone like me. I only want a gentle pointer. You have educated me and I am asking you as a teacher. It's almost my 70th or try again and fail/forget and need a few points please (not hindu, not sure what?) but trying day after dayj
If A is afflicting B then A would have to be be 'near' B to do said afflicting. Not only did she misrepresent you, Nilesh but she doesn't understand proximity. I know what you mean about intellectually bankrupt. I wonder where she got her Doctorate.
Namaskar. Thank you. To be precise, her false accusation refers to me claiming Pidyate = near. A Graha may give peeda (affliction, trouble, torture) to a specific nakshatra by being near that nakshatra or even from a distance and in multiple ways. I asserted Saturn near Nakshatra Bhaga (Uttara Phalguni) because the shlok refers to 'akramya' (near). She completely missed that point.
🙏🏽🚩🙏🏽
🙏🙏
The truth discovered by you, is always stays.
Nilesh ji, is Krishna's horoscope consistent with the 5561BCE dating of Mahabharata war?
Namaskar.
I do not know about the horoscope since I am not an astrologer.
However, Krishna's leaving his body at the time of flooding and destruction of Krishna's Dwarka, 36 years after the Mahabharata war is consistent with global geology, oceanography, sedimentology, and climatology evidence (5525 BCE).
It is also consistent with the Mahabharata war in 5561 BCE (300+ astronomy + multidisciplinary scientific evidence)
It is also consistent with Krishna killing Kamsa in 5622 BCE (based on empirically validated evidence of Harivamasha
It is also consistent with Krishna being 11 years old (born in 5633 BCE) at the time of killing Kamsa (based on Srimad Bhagavata Purana evidence)
It is also consistent with the estimation of Srila Madhvacharya for Krishna's lifetime to be 107 years (5633 BCE - 5525 BCE).
Hope this helps.
Apratim Uttara.
Namaskaram!
🙏🙏
निलेश जी, बुद्धीचा चक्रव्यूह होत आहे, पण संयमाने काही अंश पचनी पडू शकतो. धन्यवाद.
किती भांडतारें, लहान मुलांसारखे? 😂😂😂😂😂
Hi Nilesh Oak ji! I've been following your work and find it incredibly fascinating. I have a question about your choice of using Voyager 4.5 software over Stellarium. Both software programs offer powerful astronomical features, but I'm curious to know what specifically drew you towards Voyager 4.5. Could you please share your insights on why you prefer Voyager and what advantages it offers in your astronomical research? I'm eager to learn from your expertise. Thank you!
Metaphorically speaking...Tesla vs Ford.
😄🙏
Dr. @NileshOak
Namaskar
Perhaps things are in not your correct perspective.
As I understand she follows classical Indian Astronomy. This implies that there is involvement of the traditional Kali yuga calendar. Obviously, this calendar doesn't sync with your dates.
It boils down to 7200 Vs 26000
Hope this helps.
Namaskar
1. It is unjust to take one theory based on certain ref and it's interpretation which is also contradicted by the very text and to call it classical Indian astronomy theory.
2. The specific discussion is about Nakshatra Devatas and planetary positions. This is unaffected by precession theories you are referring to.
Hope this helps.
I did a little math, way through/before the big bang and (not buying tbb) and almost tripled the accepted universe timeline. & (God) was still more than light speed away. I'm not built in (sadly) but I know what has been misrepresented to someone like me. I only want a gentle pointer. You have educated me and I am asking you as a teacher. It's almost my 70th or try again and fail/forget and need a few points please (not hindu, not sure what?) but trying day after dayj
Hard to understand astrology references.. any way to get the intro & get better at it??
Namaskar
Read my books and watch my other videos.
If A is afflicting B then A would have to be be 'near' B to do said afflicting. Not only did she misrepresent you, Nilesh but she doesn't understand proximity. I know what you mean about intellectually bankrupt. I wonder where she got her Doctorate.
Namaskar. Thank you.
To be precise, her false accusation refers to me claiming Pidyate = near. A Graha may give peeda (affliction, trouble, torture) to a specific nakshatra by being near that nakshatra or even from a distance and in multiple ways.
I asserted Saturn near Nakshatra Bhaga (Uttara Phalguni) because the shlok refers to 'akramya' (near).
She completely missed that point.
@@NileshOak Oh yes. She was nowhere "near" that point 🤣😂
@@NoelWesley
😂😂
@NileshOak