It takes time for truth, a mind like a parachute. Does work unless it is open. Education the people is very time consuming. Like emptying the pacific ocean with a tea cup.
Let's say a cell phone was illegally searched & seized by no warrant nor voluntary consent. Let's say the police gets phone records from cell phone company then use such evidence from the cell phone record to convict someone. Would the cell phone record from the cell phone company be the poisonous fruit?
@@simmonstye2 okay, thanks. There was no warrant issued to search and seize the cell phone. The detective said: "we want to take a look at your phone to check the call history and if you don't let us we're going to take it with us" To me that is coercion bc the consent was persuaded by threat which makes it involuntary consent which makes it illegal search & seize. My brother has been locked up for 12 years and I finally was able to obtain his case file from his trial court attorney. I found the detective interview wherein they threatened to take the phone if his girlfriend didn't let detectives searched the phone in front of them. They searched the phone then took it. Sorry for the long paragraph just wanted to give you a little more info.
My brother talked to an attorney. The attorney said even though my brother was with his girlfriend when they took the phone, she was the one that was actually coerced into letting the detective search and seize the phone, not him. He concluded for that reason my brother doesn't have an argument🤦 That attorney's statement goes right out the window when you ask the following question: IS IT OKAY TO VIOLATE A PERSON'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT IN ORDER TO CONVICT ANOTHER PERSON? The answer is obviously no. They can't violate his girlfriend's Fourth amendment right then use evidence from such illegal search and seizure to convict him. Nothing changes the fact that the evidence obtained illegally.
When they win a case, they all get bonuses, even your defense attorney does….
Good information
It takes time for truth, a mind like a parachute. Does work unless it is open.
Education the people is very time consuming. Like emptying the pacific ocean with a tea cup.
Your counsel could care less about you, they get a bonus if they lose…..
Don’t need school to become smart….
Let's say a cell phone was illegally searched & seized by no warrant nor voluntary consent. Let's say the police gets phone records from cell phone company then use such evidence from the cell phone record to convict someone. Would the cell phone record from the cell phone company be the poisonous fruit?
Yes, it depends illegally can fit the category of fruit of poisonous tree. If they obtain by a warrant then evidence is admissible.
@@simmonstye2 okay, thanks. There was no warrant issued to search and seize the cell phone. The detective said:
"we want to take a look at your phone to check the call history and if you don't let us we're going to take it with us"
To me that is coercion bc the consent was persuaded by threat which makes it involuntary consent which makes it illegal search & seize.
My brother has been locked up for 12 years and I finally was able to obtain his case file from his trial court attorney. I found the detective interview wherein they threatened to take the phone if his girlfriend didn't let detectives searched the phone in front of them. They searched the phone then took it.
Sorry for the long paragraph just wanted to give you a little more info.
@@demicosmith9371 definitely they are in the wrong. Looks like you have a case.
My brother talked to an attorney. The attorney said even though my brother was with his girlfriend when they took the phone, she was the one that was actually coerced into letting the detective search and seize the phone, not him. He concluded for that reason my brother doesn't have an argument🤦
That attorney's statement goes right out the window when you ask the following question:
IS IT OKAY TO VIOLATE A PERSON'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT IN ORDER TO CONVICT ANOTHER PERSON? The answer is obviously no.
They can't violate his girlfriend's Fourth amendment right then use evidence from such illegal search and seizure to convict him. Nothing changes the fact that the evidence obtained illegally.
@@demicosmith9371 Good stuff. She can't make the call to search for you. That is an invasion of privacy. Violation of 4th Amendment.