Why the F-15 Still TERRIFIES Russia
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 03. 2024
- Dive into the high-stakes world of aerial warfare as we explore the tactical dance of stealth and detection 🛩️. From the ancient wisdom of Sun Tzu to modern-day marvels like the US F-15 Eagle and Russia's SU-57, discover the critical role of misdirection and the relentless arms race between hiding and seeking in the skies. Will the venerable F-15 Eagle outmaneuver Russia's cutting-edge SU-57 with its advanced infrared detection? Join us as we analyze these formidable fighters' origins, capabilities, and the art of war in the 21st century 🌍✈️🔍. #militaryanalysis #militarytech #russia #fighterjetshowdown #fighterjet
#themilitaryshow - Věda a technologie
Radar DOES NOT use "sound waves," as this episode states roughly 6 minutes and 40 seconds into this video. Instead, Radar uses RADIO WAVES!!! 😂
Hey according to Freddie Mercury radio is GAGA and makes noises. And that's sound! So stop being a hater 😂
RADAR is literally an acronym for Radio Detection And Ranging😂
Still far from the biggest inaccuracy in this video. Hell it's not even the only weird reference to sound, a few seconds earlier it mentioned overcoming SONAR. The density of errors in the video is rather astonishing, it actually might so bad that ChatGPT would have done better.
True
Videos on this channel often have bad inaccuracies. They don't seem to care much.
Stating the F22 lost dog fights to the F15 glosses over a lot of constraints the F22 pilot had to follow to due to training requirements and preserving RAM.
Facts. The F-22s and F-35s are almost always stacked with lunberg reflectors and the external fuel tanks to make them much easier to see and harder to maneuver. They’re usually tied down with VERY limited intercept constraints and I’ve read that there have been exercises where the 4th Gen fighters are intercepting 10-20:1 with AWACS and other support and the F-22 and F-35s are purposely seriously hamstrung.
I don’t know why people think these F22 and F35 are at full capability when doing these little DF shows and training
@@FloridaManMatty The F-35 is experiencing the same doctrinal issues that were realized with the F-4 Phantom in Vietnam: Jack of all, Master of None.
There IS a reason why the USAF has desperately tried to hide the after-action report of the Red Flag Exercise where a Gripen defeated the F-35.
You learn more from a loss than a win.
That's the point exactly. They handicap the F22 till it's competitive with the older plane, then see what happens.
"F22 does not have any serious victories in air to air combat"....... That baloon was pretty jacked though.
The SU57 is soviet style hype. It’s a flying Fyre Festival.
It barely flies and is being compared to the 50 year old Eagle.
Like everything from this Terrorstate.
Terminator, t90, t80, t72, su35, S300, allll crap
Ohhh dude that is a good comparison, it's funny too
Slava TSMC 🇹🇼
God damn, that might be the most accurate summary of the Russian (airforce/army/navy/anything) capabilities I have heard.
104 and 0. (stats for the F15)
vs 0 and -4 (stats for the SU57)
Against 3 generation export aircraft in third world countries, let's not forget.
@@John-hu9qgthat ain’t true. 1 f15 shot down 2 mig29s and Iraq definitely wasn’t a third world military. It’s was 4th largest military on earth. The f15 has shit down multiple mig 29s. The f15 is older I believe than the mig. The f15 could take out most of Russias Air Force as it’s mostly made up of mig29s and su27s. I’d put my money on the f15ex against the su35 as it’s performed pretty bad in Ukraine. Not to mention the huge difference in pilots and training. If the US loses just 1 fighter it’s a big deal and Russian jets been faking like rain. They took out 11 in 11 days.
@@michaelbartley9572 It shot down a couple of elderly Iraqi MIG-29A export variants, in a 4 vs 1 engagement with full NATO AWACSs support vs nothing on the Iraqi side, Iraq most definitely had a third world military in every sense of the word, that was tired from 10 years of the iran-iraq war before the gulf war in 1991. They didn't even possess a single round of ammunition designed to engage western armour!🤣. The Ukrainian airforce was largely combat ineffective in as little as 10 days, and you will see exactly how long the F-16 will last also. In regards to Ukrainian shoot down claims? They were laughable at best, they couldn't provide any evidence whatsoever in relation to the majority of SU-34 claims, yes they downed one or two by quietly bringing a pair of patriot launchers and a NASAM unit forward, but then lost all three SAM units in a series of spectacular strikes by the Russians who also moved a relatively unknown weapon into position, a Tornado 200km range precision strike MLRS. Its also rumoured that some of these destroyed battery's were covertly manned by American and other NATO personnel killed in the strikes.
Iraq was still ranked 4th in the world for military power at the time with on of the best air defense in the world,
@@joshjessicaolson-wg9xb Totally false, their air defence systems were based on equipment from the 60s and 70s, almost all of it, the non double digit stuff previously compromised from the Arab-Israeli wars decades earlier. The US even received some captured examples, radars etc from Israel. The only area that Iraq had any credible threat was their artillery but without control of their airspace that threat was quickly neutralised.
Russia is not scaring anyone. That new F15 EX is something they should worry about.
I think it's hilarious (also, awesome) that we can revisit an older design like the F-15 and just modernize a few parts of it, and it's at least as effective as a brand-new design. Goes to show you how well designed the F-15 was/is.
I don't think Russia is thinking twice about a plane which primary role will be domestic defence. The F-22 and F-35 is what they fear.
@@janhansen3753actually….the F15 especially the EX would serve as second hand damage after the stealth jets came in and destroyed land to air threats that could lock them up
@@janhansen3753 The F-35 is suffering from the same problem that the F-4 Phantom experienced in Vietnam. Jack of all Trades, Master of None. Seems like Western leaders go in a cycle where they think they need a multi-purpose vehicle only to come to the same realization of previous generations that having dedicated frames for a specific purpose is more effective. What they should be looking for is NOT multi-purpose aircraft, but rather PARTS inter-operability.
@lafosh7234 the F-15EX will be the F-35s missile truck. Think of it as an an extended mag for the 5th gen.
You really don't understand infra-red do you?
The fact that Russia is nervous says a lot, they don’t think their best fighter can handle the American jet
They always knew that..that’s why there military doctrine focuses on quantity versus quality
@@lafosh7234problem for Russia that US has both. 😂
@@quandmeme9970 problem for Russia and maybe China if they feeling frisky is the shit we don’t see or hear about on the news…it’s them secret weapons department in our government folks should be worried about
Wo hast du denn das gelesen , die Mig 29 hat das lumpige Teil schon platt gemacht im Jugoslawienkrieg 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Nervous?😂 nato is losing
I stopped watching when Radar was referred to as sound waves and sonar was apparently used to detect air planes lol.
So true, SONAR vs RADAR
Always loved the F-15 Eagle. Simply the best ever.👏
Now give it crack and stealth tech and you have the f-22 raptor. We don't even need to use the f-22.
Yep
Dassault Rafale: Slava 🥖
@@Booz2020 the Eagle, 104_ 0
@@Booz2020 Rafale is a beautiful and great plane, but it doesn't have the record or history as the F-15. Maybe it will later in time.
Turned this off the moment the narrator said that radar operates on sound waves....
Dassault Rafale: Slava 🥖
Brings everything else that was said into question. Just started watching this channel, unsubscribed.
Well sonar and radar kind of works same way. No biggie that orher wave moves speed of light and other about 1 235 km/h. in air. Not to make too much fuss about the fact that planes dont usually travel under water where sonars are used.@@Talven81
Yep, same. The bullshit about thermal vs infrared and the aircraft actively illuminating in infrared is also complete and utter bullocks. Actually, everything is in this video is bullocks. Yes, the F-15 will be a match for the SU-35, but for completely different reasons than the bull** in this video.
This “guy” is using ChatGPT for his script and likely paying someone for the narration. Every single video is like this. Just a simple regurgitation of the Wikipedia articles the LLM was trained on.
The F15 has the most amazing radar, it will see an SU 57 from a long ways off.
Pretty sure you confused radar with sonar here (6:47)
Yup. Radar doesn’t detect sound waves.
There's also some heavy "artistic liberties" used from 13:00 onwards when the IR is discussed.
"Sir! Radar just pinged off of a sonic boom in sector G7!"
RADAR is literally an acronym for Radio Detection And Ranging😂
You really need to get a script editor in with a decent grasp of science, particularly physics. Your description of radar is... not how radar works at all. Radar is an electromagnetic wave, not a sound wave. This hugely holes the credibility of what is already a very ropey script. As a channel with over 3/4 of a million subscribers I would expect you can afford a decent script writer or editor. If you don't have one of those, drop me a line and I'll come sort it out for you for a reasonable fee :D
That had me raising my eyebrows, too lol... I was like... sound waves? That's sonar, not radar! lol
they use a bot to write and read the script the ia has made, i doubt if there is even someone that has listened to that thing befire dumping it in the internet.
What about airplanes being built so they can hide from SONAR? I hope we don’t have flying submarines. Or jet fighters that can fly underwater. The video creator made a wealth of mistakes in this video.
@@ecleveland1 ruzzia just converted a su27 into a submarine.
Lol and "inferred is not to be confused with thermal"
Go ahead Pooty, send in your T-14s and SU-57s. Afraid they'll become burning scrap?
Multiple mistakes in this video:
1. Radar does not work off sound waves.
2. The F-15EX is the "missile truck" model. Not the F-15C.
3. The F-35 is equipped with the 25mm GAU-12/U rotary cannon, not the M61A2.
Seriously, do a bit of fact-checking on your researchers before this stuff goes live.
Not necessarily the F-16, even the upgraded F-4 phantom can still destroy the Su57 easily. su57 is just like su27 but different design
It’s not the plane it’s the pilot....
We have much better pilots too so...
I mean if one of the pilots is in an American plane and one is in a shitty Russian one it really is more about the plane
The F22 is the scariest thing with wings since the Cretaceous Period.
Have you ever seen a peregrine falcon
"Windmills do not work that way! Goodnight!"
I love the stock F-16 footage while talking about how great the F-15 is…
Russians talking about 6th gen but haven't even produced a true 5th gen yet.
“Horsepower and gunpowder”
The new fly by wire on the F-15X makes them crazy maneuverable
25% of the imagery used in this video is incorrect. You are diseminating information that is incorrect.
Yes, but you need to perfect your spelling, i.e., disseminating. 😉
@@richardzelade Quite right. When I'm typing on an old Dell E6410 with a wobbly keyboard, tiny deviations can be forgiven. If the mistakes in imagery in this video were of the same scale, they would be forgiven.
The value of a weapon system is NEVER best determined by 1 on 1 scenarios. No one, not even Russia, sends up aircraft for one-on-one duels unsupported.
There is a lot of other factors involved. Aerial refueling to enhance combat endurance, airborne and ground based radar support, SAM support, EW support, pilot training, and even quality of basic maintenance matter.
In this case, the Su-57s go up looking for F-15s who may be easily detected at range.... and as they maneuver around to get the F-15s they get bushwacked by the F-22s or F-35s they never saw. Then the F-15s volley off their long-range missile load to mop up any survivors. Or the F-22s and F-35s can remain covert and provide targeting data for the F-15EX's massive missile load, then come in and sweep up anything left.
F-22 is the plane that disappears in history. Less ready than 50 years old f-15.
The F-15 remains a credible threat BECAUSE of the F35 and F22.
It's easy to do (I guess) but @9:00 in, those are not MiG-25 Foxbats. Those are MiG-31 Foxhounds.
Very nice piece on individual pieces of tech. 👍
Aside from bombing a few safe targets in Syria, all we really know about the SU-57 is what Russian sources brag about. A lot of creditability there. Whereas the capability of the F-15 is documented by 40 years of combat action by the USAF and several allied countries.
It's so stealthy it's never been seen in actual combat, or flying in a combat zone. It's a Potemkin display fighter.
Man, IR vs thermal imaging is most likely written by someone who has no clue.
The F-15 would scare the crap out of ANY RATIONAL PERSON.
Gotta avoid that sonar detection!
No reason to retire this aircraft, ever. IMHO, the best ever built.
The AIM260 being produced soon coupled with the F-15EX radar is going to be super sweet!
nice video, but:
- RADAR does not run on sound waves, but rather radio waves (in the cm and mm range).
The ECHOLOT works with sound waves, which was first used by the British in WW2 against German submarines.
- There are 2 infrared/thermal imaging systems. Active and passive. In one case, the battlefield is illuminated and the reflection is registered by a sensor. This was first used by the Germans in WW2.
The next generation does not need any illumination, but rather registers the (long-wave) infrared signature that the object emits.
This is probably also what is meant here, in order to register the signature of the engine, even if the aircraft is not detected by the radar.
In principle, stealth aircraft are not entirely invisible. In Yugoslavia and also in Iraq, F117s were found and combated by long-wave radar devices (cm range) (older system from the USSR).
The German company Hensold is building a similar radar that can find stealth aircraft sooner.
Who does the fact checking on this? Radar does not use sound waves. It is an acronym for radio detection and ranging. Radio Waves propagate at the speed of light not the speed of sound. Infrared detection from IRST is completely passive. Nothing is sent out. We aren't talking about the 1950s and 1960s infrared lamps used by tanks.
Finally, there's a serious question as to whether the Sukhoi Su 57 is a true 5th generation aircraft. It has a lot of non-stealthy angles and those engine inlets look rather suspect.
I bet the SU-57 is good at hiding from sonar...in the sky
Radar using sound waves??? If you can't even get this right, your credibility is zero.
He mentioned sonar in airfigter topic. I don't think he knows what's he talking about.
Yeah RADAR is literally an acronym for Radio Detection And Ranging. The guy is confused and not as knowledgeable as he should be 🤦
this channel isnt exactly for bright minded people, its to please US army fanbois that eat this shit like candy.
@@dennythedavinchi3832 sound has been used in early detection systems before, and then they invented radar and it was instantly replaced
Lol can anyone else remember before the war people were asking if the su57 could go nose to nose with F22s and F35s lol 😊
"F15 never lost a dogfight... " Tell that to the British Sea Harrier pilots that kicked its arse in multiple (radar/Digital monitored) engagements. The kill ratio average of the Royal Navy Sea Harrier against the F15 was 3 to 1. Sharkey Wards personal ratio was 20+ to 1.
Go back to school mr.Bean, it's hilarious to hear radar emiting sound waves
The F-15 EX are brand new airframes, It isn't an upgrade to preexisting aircraft, they are a cheaper option then stealth air craft but designed to integrate with them.
Dassault Rafale: hold our 🥖 please 😎
Well first of all you're right they are brand new airframes but they are a 100% upgraded design. And no they're not cheap, in fact unless we buy more than the current 18 we have ordered they will not be cheaper than the F-35
This has got to be a response to the meme “Release the Eagle”
[Hellsing intensifies] _FETCH ME THEIR SOULS!!!_
You forget to point out that almost every USSR/Russian weapon system of the last 40 years has performed well below what its paper specifications say they should.
0:30 Why did the American jet attack the UK?
they hate us thats why
Because it's the British they wont forgive them for the burning of the white house in 1812
The SU57 is only stealthy nose on. If there is an AWACS in the area the SU57 doesn't have a chance because the AWACS can relay positional information to any allied aircraft. This will give the F35 the ability to engage the SU57 from another zip code.
As with the Radar comment confusing sound with radio wave. This video describes Infra-Red as a radio. Talking about IR emitters that bounce IR off other plains? IR is detected passively as an emission from another object. It is not bounced off the object like RADAR or SONAR.
The F15, is getting a face-lift and going to be in service for a couple more decades. Fact of the matter is the only plane that can beat the f-15 in the sky today is the f-15 and the F22 and F35. America's design it's still outstanding that we designed a plane 40 years ago that has only been matched by newer American planes 🤣
From what I have heard or read, it's the best as far as thrust to weight. Or climb rate. Something of that sort. Can't remember exactly what it was?????
Saying that F-15 is unbeatable is a one of the most arrogant signature of a true American patriot(beer drinker+tv watcher type)
@@worldoftancraft it kill record is 104-0. Its a fact not a boast. Whats your nationality?
@@mj_slender6717 yes and yes. Also only jet to kill a satellite. Look it up👍
@@robertgarcia217 if you cannot get the mesage, I can use even more simple English: unbeatED =/= unbeatABLE. Can you grasp the difference? I am Rossiânin.
US F-15s are not carrying AIM-9L or M’s anymore, they have all been upgraded with the high off borsight and advanced AIM-9X Making use of the helmet mounted queueing system.
It's not "shukoi", it's "sukhoi"
I bet MY lunch the F15 would eat the Su-57 for lunch. Granted it would be a very quick diety lunch because they ain't much SU-57s available. 😂
More like an appetizer than a meal.
I thought the F-35 carried the GAU-22 25mm gun not the M-61 20mm?
When the narrator said that radar is a sound wave, I knew this would be somewhat false information. F-15 would win assuming it can see the SU-57.
@ 6:50.....RADAR uses radio waves, not sound waves.
G O A T : 104 - 0 🔥❤️
Even,
Mike Tyson : 50 - 6 😁
There is something ironic with people saying that the Russian Stealth Fighter (SU-57) hasn't been seen in Ukraine yet.
Why only a brief mention about the F15-EX Eagle 2?
He's just simple American nationalist. Can't distinguish SONAR and RADAR.
If you think radar uses sound waves, I don't think you are qualified to speak about anything in this video. Unsubscribed.
Just a hypothetical question - in each sense. In reality the scrap jet Su-57 not even exists. 14 years after the first flight, just a handful of Su-57 jets have been produced which are all different. The jet is a joke.
@6:50 "radar uses sound waves".. no Sonar uses Sound waves, Radar uses Radiation waves, Electromagnetic Waves..
Radar=sound waves.....muhgawd
Too bad I really wanted the su 57 to be bad ass…it’s so sexy looking
unbelievable! The Military Show finally makes good, factually accurate relevant video.
Really? Where is it?
As long as they only have 9 or anything less than 50 of those SU-57s, they are pretty much irrelevant.
Very interesting analysis ! Thanks
Russia's actions with the SU-57, remind me of Saddam husseins in hiding his jets in gulf wars
Imagine updating F-15B/D so the WSO issues commands to a drone wing. But I guess the stealthy F-35 is better suited for that role
As is also the F15EX.
@@BurntOrangeHorn78 The EX is single-seat. I think a backseat driver would be optimal for controlling the drones while the pilot focuses on flying
@@hanrockabrand95 F15EX is dual tandem seat.
@@BurntOrangeHorn78 I stand corrected
Actually the f-15ex will have both single seat and dual configurations.
But the single seat F-15 will still have the same cockpit area the second seat will not be utilized.
Also all the other f-15s we have currently, will be aging out within the next 5 to 10 years max. So you can't even upgrade them because the airframes will be worn out
Please stop scaring russians. Getting tons of email "hey bro, so scared of the f15"
pilot skill will be the deciding factor. edge, U.S.
no, no it wont be
No if you're going to go strictly on pilot then it's not Edge usa, it's overwhelmingly usa. But in this particular case the F-15 would smoke the su-57 in a heartbeat
RADAR is not sound waves, but radio waves of different frequencies, depending on what you want to "see".
13:50 That is not at all how IRST works.
Infrared Search and Track is a fancy name for "heat vision". It is a 100% passive system.
It's basically just a camera that can detect differences in heat.
The F-15 also has a huge advantage over the Su-57: It actually can live up to its reputation and there are hundreds of them.
Also, the USAF just ordered a couple hundred F-15EX to supplement the existing airframes and ease the burden on F-35 frames. This is on top of NGAD.
Simon, you really need to do better research, because this isn't the first time you've been very wrong in one of your videos and I found all this out simply by googling the information.
F-15EX exists because vii bezt plain eva' eF-22 didn't make it. Didn't become what it should have. Therefore the replacement pair of f-15 + f-16 is pseudo-existing-plane + F-35
And still, the su57 is really huge and you can see the turbine blades from the front.. that is really not Stealth no matter how much ram you paint it with
What if they shove RAM down the intakes? Like.... So the engines eat it... Have stealth farts then too
First what is the number of the Su-57, you are talking about? Literally there many iterations of this plane with significant differences. SUCH AS RAM blockers before the blades.
The SU57 is not a 5th generation fighter let alone a sixth generation one. At most it is a 4++ generation..
the russian military estimated the RCS of the SU-57 is 100 times bigger than the proven RCS of the F-22
True but even the US cant currently build anything that can match the F-22 or even new F-22 also the SU-57 is their first compared to the US's (115 Night Hawk!) it's much better but yes it sucks it was 25 year late and based on an existing airframe (The Flanker!) rather than build new from the ground up, Also the SU-57 still lacks it's dedicated new engines
Best Stealth Aircraft ever built was the VF-23 (Black Widow and Ghost Bat!) they were more stealthy just as fast but lost because they didn't show off fancy moves it was capable of and still was (for the prototypes!) Analog Majority Controls but was planned to get a fully Digital Cockpit and HUD Helmet
@@DarthAwar NGAD?
Show me the plane you cant as it is not even in testing yet never mind production it might never happen (It will but until it's actually in mass production it should be treated as Vapor Wear!) why fight a real war with Hypothetical Resources you can't just with what you have right at that moment! @@pooferfish2850
@DarthAwar what the hell are you even talking about? The F-35 is more stealthy than the f-22. The F-22 was our third attempt at stealth.
Actually our first attempt at a stealth aircraft was the Have-Blue test bed which is 100 * stealthier than the su-57. Our first production stealth aircraft was the F-117 Nighthawk.
Not sure where you're coming up with the F-115😂😂😂
And the second production aircraft with stealth was the F-22 which is several Generations beyond the f-117. And the current F-35 along with the B21 Raider are even further stealthier than the F-22 or any previous aircraft.
And for the su-57 to be Russia's first attempt at stealth is actually quite embarrassing. Because it's not even a stealth aircraft it's barely low observability. In fact it may not even be low observable, some estimates are that it has the radar cross section of a slick f-18.😂
And as far as the video goes, the su-57 if they ever are able to produce a combat version of it that's really ready, wouldn't stand a chance.
Also it's very doubtful that they'll ever even build any more of them because they lack the Western components to build them. They are not capable of manufacturing the microchips along with dozens of other components on their own😂😂
@@DarthAwar😂😂😂😂😂😂
Sadly the F22 is design against that sensor already
This is in large part a numbers game. How many F15’s can be brought to bear vs SU57? The number of SU57’s is so low, it is pretty much a non factor in any prolonged war.
21.
That is the total number of Su-57's built. And most of them were non-flying test prototypes.
@@nobodyknows3180my point exactly. But thanks for the stat.
Most of your videos are pretty decent.... this one is absolutely packed with flaws. Some of the bigger key points being that Radar is not sound waves but electromagnetic RADIO waves. Then there's the statement that infrared "sensors" (AKA infrared search & track) would give the F-15 an advantage over modern jets.... all update 4 and 5th gen fighters have this capability. In fact, the Russian fighters have had it for decades - this is one area where Americans actually fell behind the curve because we were more concerned about fighting terrorism than being at the forefront of fighter technology for the last 22 years. Then there's the idea that the F-35 or the F-22 "could hold their own/defeat" a Su-57. They both have major advantages over the Russian jet. They boast WAY WAY smaller RCS (they are WAY harder to see/track/lock with Radar), better radar, more effective missiles (The AIM120 AMRAAM may have less range than the R77 but it has a much better on board radar and is more consistent in finding its target), and better situational awareness. Either plane will dominate the Su-57 in all but a dog-fight. That said, a pair of F-15s, even EX, are going to have a bad day in an engagement with a pair of Su-57s. Despite having a more powerful radar, the F-15's RCS is so massive that there's simply no way it's picking up the Su-57 before the Su-57 has fired on it. The Su-57 is not on par with American 5th gen fighters, but it still out-classes any 4th gen fighter. The F-15EX is not meant to go head to head with the Su-57. It's meant to shoot at it using a radar lock data-linked to it via an F-35 that snuck up on the Sukhoi
The SU-57 is not a 5th gen aircraft. It is at best a 4.5. And it's not Stealth either, its stealth adjacent.
It's stealth-ish!
6:50 "Sound waves bounce of an object" uhmm that is not what a radar uses. These are EM / electromagnetic waves not sound. You seem to refer to a ping from an submarine.
RCS falls somewhere between 0.1 and 0.5 to 1 square meters as where the f22 and f35 have a rcs range of widely recognized to be less than 0.0001 square meters. So the Su-57 is more of a 4th gen then 5th eg they aren't confident in it just like the T-14
Thermal sensors do not send out waves of anything.
Exsqueeze me? Radar is in the electromagnetic scale, it is not sonic! SONAR uses sound!
Sound waves would be a sonar system, Radar uses radio waves 6:50
They forgot that Su-27 30 and 35s series are more superior than the F15s, with manuverability, agility, and more efficient than the American fighters
It seems like you're reading the factory sales literature for the SU-57 and actually believe it. Here's a hint: No outside source has vetted the claims or capabilities. In contrast, the 20 year old F-22 has participated in scores of mock dogfights against top of the line fighters from NATO countries and other allies in week long training exercises. To put it very mildly, Russia is known for exaggerating the capabilities of its weapons and vehicles. The SU-57, T-14 and BMPT "Terminator" are made for parades and shopping mall openings as each of their miniscule production numbers indicate.
While the US does not a country, learned the word «advertising»? "Publical" articles where F-22 RCS is times of magnite lower than F-117 is rudicilous. Yet you belive.
@@worldoftancraft Wow, English much? Or does incoherency run in your family?
@@red94mr28 if I replaced "aren't being" with "doesn't" because something broke in the thinking process, it doesn't make the message senseless. You can continue shifting away from the topic, mr Ad
@@worldoftancraft Sniffing glue is very bad for you. It causes hallucinations, like referencing "aren't being" when it doesn't appear in your post above. Try to avoid huffing it in the future.
@@red94mr28 you are really that dull that you present my description of the error, what I wrote and what I should've instead, as a hallicilation?
You really this much taskless that you have time for this? You humuliate yourself by the very yourselves deeds.
F-22 and F-35 lack low radar signature? 6:10
Flew both can confirm im lying
The Beatles forever ♾️
I don't think IRST is as big of an advantage as you think it is. At most we are likely talking a range of about 30 miles, and that is optimistic. We are talking beyond visual range, but not much beyond visual range. (also the SU-57 reportedly has IRST as well) I also think you overestimate the SU-57's stealth capability. They are estimated to be pretty equivalent to a Super Hornet in a clean configuration, at ~1m^2. (This is like 1000 times greater than the likes of the F-22 and F-35.) Fully loaded the F-15 also has a HUGE radar signature. Like ENORMOUS. We are talking some 15 m^2. The SU-57 can probably detect the F-15 at 150+ miles, despite the Russians weaker radars.
The F-15 also does not have a monopoly on long range air to air missiles. The Russians claim up to 200 miles, but who knows if it is actually true, and how effective they are at that range. (I'd put my money on the older US AMRAAM, and newer JATM, but still, not a U.S. monopoly)
In a one on one starting from a distance scenario (which is highly unlikely in real life), I suspect the SU-57 will detect the F-15 much sooner than the F-15 detects the SU-57, and thus the SU-57 would be able to fire long range air to air missiles first. While the Su-57's radar signature is large for a stealth aircraft, it is better than no stealth at all, and gives it an advantage there in detect-ability against an older platform like the F-15. Still, the SU-57 will likely show up on the F-15's radar before it shows up on its IRST.
I would argue the SU-57 is barely a 5th gen fighter at all. More like a very advanced 4th gen fighter, and more advanced than the aging F-15.
In air to air capability, I would rank them as follows:
F-22 > F-35 >>> SU-57 > F-15
flying T-14
no plane is immune now
The SU-57 is not very stealthy. Both the F-35 and the F-22 can detect the SU-57 long before it can detect them.
Most people misunderstand Stealth to begin with. It has less to do with being "invisible" and more to do with being able to acquire a targeting lock. The non-stealthy aircraft can still see the stealth but has to get much closer before his weapons can effectively hit their target.
😮 no you're actually incorrect. Stealth has to do with being unseen to the other aircraft radars.
You can't see it without getting a radar lock on it basically.
Now there are some ground-based x-band Radars that can detect that a stealth aircraft is in the area but it cannot pinpoint it with any degree of accuracy, not even really accurate enough to Vector another aircraft to that area
@@davidford3115yeah you are completely misunderstanding stealth technology yourself
@@Wyomingchief Air traffic control radars at airports can see stealth aircraft just fine. They don't need to have a weapon's lock and so the accuracy of where they plot the location of an aircraft doesn't need to be so precise. And yes, vectoring an intercepting aircraft CAN be done with such a radar.
It has become a trend to make computer animation and a map to express the view with little knowledge gained from watching similar videos. They compare with un-symmetrical types of equipment. It would have been better to compare SU-57 to f-22 (Raptor).
The SU-57 is a flying Armata 14.
I would love to hear your reaction tou "Against the Wind" by Bob Seger
Haven't finish vid but how stealthy is su57. Thought it's only as stealthy as f18 unless they're only ever been flown with radar enhancers?
If the F-15 could have Thrust Vectoring like the F22, Look Out!!
Yeah well we gotta see su57s on the battlefield first 😂
When Russia brags about their aircraft… forgive me if I don’t believe you, Comrade