Anna Wintour: "To be in Vogue has to mean something"
Vložit
- čas přidán 10. 12. 2011
- Vogue magazine is about to hit a big anniversary. A new book captures the fashion's Bible's most famous covers, and a digital archive will bring 120 years of publishing history to your computer screens. Serena Altschul gets a sneak peek.
fashion isn't just clothing; it's art, culture, and history
The US Vogue needs to balance between the celebrities and high fashion models covers. One of the reasons for today's models not as influencial as they used to be
I like the old covers more. They are more creative.
being on the cover of vogue USED to mean something. It's time for Anna to pass the torch on to someone who is not so celebrity obsessed. Her team are too obsessed with trying to follow trends instead of making trends.
To be in Vogue USED to mean something, dear Anna. Up until the moment when you put Kim Kardashian on the cover. That was when Vogue stopped being a Fashion Bible, a Role Model, an Inspiration and became a regular cheap publication, synonymous with no respect for real, hard-working genuine talent.
I actually don't like that Vogue started putting actors/singers on the cover. I believe that was when the industry started to shift again. In the 40's even through the early 60's, if you didn't have "the look" or "undeniable beauty" you were completely nexted. The late 60's and 70's brought a breakthrough. A great shift where looking relatable and being relatable was much more revered. It was an empowering time for the arts and the films and music of that time are just better in my opinion. It was about substance over superficiality. Then came 1989 and Madonna on the cover and it changed the game. We regressed back to the 50's and made artists/actors/singers have to look like models. Now with technology and photoshop aps, it's bled down to the masses and we have become a superficial society just wasting away at the idea of having another follower or getting another like. It was ground breaking, but for all the wrong reasons.
I agree totally . Having a kardashian on the cover cheapens Vogue.
Anna should change the magazine name to Vague, as in I vaguely remember when Vogue was a fashion bible.
Vogue lost this prestige when they put Kim K on the cover.
I hate to say it, but those who criticize fashion need to check themselves. When you go to a store to purchase a shirt or pants you not only look for something that fits but also something that looks nice. That is fashion. Fashion is part of our everyday life. It's art in every sence of the word. Do you know how fashion works? Big designers like Galliano or Lagerfeld have runway shows. Then smaller brands copy them, then smaller brands copy them and so on until you get what you buy at Wal-Mart. So that funky outfit you have on with your unshaven armpits and hair legs was a decendant of the outfit in Anna Wintours office.
I agree. I think no celebrity ever looks quite as good on these covers as a great model would.
The editing has such a 90s feel to it, I actually thought it was an old video at the start!
They don't use models anymore :( it's so sad considering it is a fashion magazine
Vouge covers have gone down hill from the moment they started putting only celebrities
Great segment!!!
everyone hates kim kardashian yet EVERYONE is talking about her. thats exactly why she was on the cover.
Anna Winter needs a total makeover! Including the sunglasses.
WOW ... That's the first time I've seen Anna laugh n smile!!!
Anna Wintour is a genius. I love what she has done for the magazine over the years. I have been a subscriber for years and I have never been disappointed. Anna always knows what is going to work best for the magazine.
is miranda priestly in THE Devil wears Prada based on her ?