Saab Gripen Flight Demonstration - Farnborough Airshow
Vložit
- čas přidán 12. 07. 2016
- Click to subscribe! bit.ly/subAIRBOYD
Saab JAS 39 Gripen Flight Demonstration - Trade Wednesday Farnborough Airshow 2016
The Saab JAS 39 Gripen (English: "griffin") is a light single-engine multirole fighter aircraft manufactured by the Swedish aerospace company Saab. It was designed to replace the Saab 35 Draken and 37 Viggen in the Swedish Air Force (Flygvapnet). The Gripen has a delta wing and canard configuration with relaxed stability design and fly-by-wire flight controls. It is powered by the Volvo RM12, and has a top speed of Mach 2. Later aircraft are modified for NATO interoperability standards and to undertake in-flight refueling.
AIRBOYD • The most viewed aviation channel on CZcams
#AIRBOYD #AvGeek - Auta a dopravní prostředky
Those high g's turns make it an outstanding enemy in a dogfight, it could be a dangerous situation try to have a close combat with it, because a good pilot could put it at anyone's six anytime, at the bullseyes of its cannon or IR homing missiles.
Nice tight turns and high G maneuvers. Incredible high alpha as well.
The math shows it has good thrust to weight ratio = 1.4, similar to the single engine popular jet fighter. Enough to have unlimited vertical.
Love the delta wing config, along with dihedral canards. I think I'm gonna design a score-and-fold Jas-39 rc plane shortly.
Thanks for sharing the vid 👍
Maybe you would like this then :)
forum.flitetest.com/index.php?threads/foamboard-saab-jas-39-gripen-edf-images-plans-build.8289/
The fact that countries buys the trainwreck F-35 instead of this jet, makes you question the IQ level of certain defense ministers.
most valuable, effective and efficient fihgting jet
Swedish engineering. Can't be beat.
That’s one sleek little fighter jet!!!
The display and especially the camera filming was extraordinary
Canada should buy the Gripen E. It seems almost purpose built for our needs as an air force. Canada will never EVER be called upon the be a "first strike" force and stealth isn't the issue for us as it is for the U.S. The Gripen is a thoroughly modern fighter and is set to carry any nato weapon and integrate easily electronically within a battlefield. The fact that with Saab"s ties with bombardier (the Bombardier Global 6000 is their base for their reconnisance aircraft) we could actualy build them here is the final icing on the cake. The Gripen E for Canada!
Stealth also makes a platform more survivable and you owe it to pilots to choose the most survivable plane that you can. Stealth also makes fifth-generation planes excellent dogfighters because in the end it is still radar that other planes use to lock onto you and fire. That said, for a fourth generation plane the SAAB has a very low radar cross section. They maximized their fourth generation design for sure. The Gripen E is an excellent choice for Canada mainly because Canada doesn't want to spend any money on their military.
French raf
@@tulockthewerewolf9744 way too expensive
Should buy Russian SU 35, The Saab Although a good interceptor, handles well it is not a air superiority fighter the Su35 has hours of loiter time! Canada has a huge sky and the longer you can keep a jet up the better protection you have!
@@wadopotato33 vi har radar som kan upptäcka både f117 och f35. Dom håller på att utveckla den för Gripen.
An excellent a/c flown by excellent pilots!
So agile! This plane just looks right and if it looks right, it usually is a good airplane. Amazing performance by the display pilot.
came here to see the Su 35 killer...( they said)... but (at least here) im not amazed at all...
It does look good, but it is a plane that is built unbalanced on purpose. By shifting the weight aft it becomes more maneuverable. So to the naked eye it looks good, but in reality it is not balanced.
@@wadopotato33 yeah, like su30 and most of the recent fighters. But they have fly by wire systems so it is not a big deal.
Awesome, he are the new aircraft of Brazillian air force.
This one is the JAS 39 Gripen, not the Gripen NG.
Shit. That baby can turn!!
Very cute, agile and lethal..awesome.
No aircraft takes this in a duel, for sure!
I want to see in a real dual. Who kills who.
What a piolet
Nice maganda short way lng pwede na mag take offf sa run way
good pilot, definitely made the aircraft look good.
Well the RTAF Gripen beat the Chinese SU27 4:0 last year thaimilitaryandasianregion.wordpress.com/2016/06/09/top-secret-outcome-of-china-and-thailand-first-strike-falcon-joint-military-exercise/
I'd rather have an experienced pilot
Comparison between F16 V & Gripen.
F16 29,000 lbs thrust
Max weight 19,500 kg
Vulcan canon 500 rounds
Ferry range 4,200km
Mac 2.2 at 55,000 ft
APG radar, infra optical.
Gripen E
Max weight 16,000kg
Thrust 23,000 lbs
Mac 2 at 50,000 ft
Single barrel canon 120 rounds
Ferry range 3,700 km
add thrust vectoring to this little bird and she would be deadly..
I hope the RCAF get the Gripen to replace the old Hornets.
Not the gripen but the French Rafs
Its a hell of plane if you Come near you are dead.
If you come close to any plane your Dead. I want to see it in a real actual fight with enemy's fighter Kill or be Killed
the sound.....its....
Amazing gripen , you need god pilot
nuevas alas grafeno fabriquen y nuevos motores hipersonicos y misiles hipersonicos
At 8:00 : aaaaaand ...I'm on your 6.
Everybody wants a Gripen. It's big hype now. I want to know if the Gripen can shoot down enemy aircraft in accutal encounter before I buy one. Air shows are just planes showing off.
Do you have the money or permission to buy one?
What's the New Brazilian Gripen NG is Better than E ?
There is no NG only E/D-model. NG was just the project name in the beginning.
Very attack
Much protect
I want to see it shoot down moving targets. It gets boring just watching them flying in circles.
Those pancake turns, how many G?
9.
We still legal? I'm not calling Jeff Sessions.
very high smoke detectable mufflers
6:09 don't fool a flying dragon...
6:00
Flying dragon, it's a paper tiger until she tasted the blood of enemy's aircraft.
gripen vendan 6 aviones financiado a colombia
Newest version would give the US F-35 more than a good run for i's money, plus it's also cheaper.
well the F-35 is garbage..so that's not really saying much.
+Commissar Dog it's not garbage
Kael K it's garbage
It really isn't, not unless you believe the nonsense and sensationalist headlines regarding it. I like the Gripen a lot, but it is no match for the F-35 even in its latest variant.
Well, you're all such CZcams experts so you must be right. Paper pushing pencil dicks.
gripen is a great plane but, it's a good match with the f18 hornet.
the current version, yes, not the new wich is majorly improved as of this year
@@j.m.jonsson8355 But there is also the Super Hornet, so....
Ese avión no tiene potencia y no creo que pueda con un su30 o 35
impressive flyer. the f35 would never dogfight with it. the gripen would be knocked out of the sky and the pilot would never see the f35 and would never knew what hit him. f35 is not a dog fighter it will knock planes out of the sky from miles away.
it has meteor so the f-35 is dead as a duck until they have it
That's assuming if the F35 was able to detect the Gripen with its 0,5 RCS
@@j.m.jonsson8355 What good does a long range missile do you against a stealth plane, you nimrod? The Meteor has a range of over 100 km, but in reality under perfect conditions it is unlikely to see the F-35 until it is well within 40 km. The stealth of the F-35 makes the meteor practically useless. You only need to pack short range missiles against fifth-generation planes because that is the distance you are going to see them at.
@@seven0929 O.5 RCS is excellent for a fourth-generation plane, but the RCS of the F-35 is 0.001 Meters squared or 500 times smaller. More than a little advantage. The Gripen has an excellent EW suite that would further reduce the range, but so does the F-35.
Well u have a point but super E JAS have a great radar and it will not be taken down with an longe range robot,cause it have a great defense for that kind of threat!!
Jf 17 thunder is better than saab grifen
😅😂🤣
Well, luckily this is Gripen
😆😅
lol
@@ianclarke7547 jf 17 is almost 1/3 price of Gripen maintenance cost is too low as compare to Gripen means Pakistan can have three JF 17 instead of 1 Gripen.
Poor performance compared to Eurofighter Typhoon and others. Notice that after the slow fly when the afterburner is ignited again, all the good fighter are able to climb vertically up, but not Gripen. In all the shows Gripen makes only a turn left at the same altitude without any climbing. This is due to the very poor thrust-to-weight ratio Gripen has, and therefore should not be bought by serious air forces, and this has been the case.
Blah blah blah......
You diss us Swedes just because you Finns see it as your job to do it, because we are neighbors and are better than you on ice hockey ..
You know you do not really mean what you write, this show was outstanding and you know it. ;)
Ya buy the F35 and you will be asking who on earth ever recommended a fighter that has lost a half dozen in crashes over the last month and can only and they either fell of the end of aircraft carriers or their engine caught of fire trying to catch a Russian bomber. Never mind air show stunts for air braking like the Russian junk. Who cares if you use afterburners for air show demo's it's not important. Super cruise at Mach 1.2 is much more important and the F35 was only able to do that for 5 minutes while the Gripen E can do it for as long as required, like a real class 5 fighter. The F35 is also slow
with a top speed of 1199 mph. As I recall the Mach 2 Gripen @50,000 ft and 1450 mph @ lower altitudes. So Pekka would you rather have an F35 with an operating cost of $45000. per flight hour of a Gripen with far superior reliability (No Crashes) during at all, ever for the Gripen E and an operating expense load of $4700. per flight hour. Hmmm
I would think this information blows your afterburners on during an air show, right our of the waster.
Is that why it managed to beat it at Red flag 2013
good pilot, definitely made the aircraft look good.
I'd rather have an experienced pilot.