@@ClickSpringReviewdo you know if they replaced with a hacking movement? I was all set to hunt for one of these when noticed your review. Hate not having a hacking movement
@@Hofology I guess them may of but my one has been disconnected for a long time now I person don't mind it as when the power is down if you apply some backwards pressure to the crown you can get it to hack . My friend just got a expensive Vacheron Constantin overseas and that doesn't hack either and nor does my Pequignet and thinking about not sure my Corum does
I just recently acquired a gently used 112 from 05. It’s running near perfectly from what I can see as its only a two hander. But I find myself gravitating to it, I rarely wear anything else..
WOW, this is so unusual to see a 177. Same decision here, sandwich dial, 44mm luminor case and manual winding. The 111 was to heavy on my wrist. The PAM177 weight makes is perfect. The watch does not feel thick, but it is. The curved lugs and the 44mm are playing a trick. My shirts are telling a different story. IBecause of the size, i dont wear the PAM often anymore.
Hi, fantastic watch. can i ask if you use the Panerai tubes on your aftermarket straps? if not are the spring bars ample to keep the strap solid on the lugs?
@@NICKVST TheSuper Avenger Chronomat Evolution 2 but sold it years a go was a great watch really enjoyed it but didn't like the bracelet and always had it on a Toshi leather strap ,
Cool video, i had a 177, and ended up wearing jt with the black rubber panerai strap. Its pretty cool, but i actually would have preferred a steel one if it had a little extra weight to it, this one was too light for me!
I am so bummed. The PAM 117 I've owned for years and paid a goodly amount for is, I am almost certain, fake. It's dead accurate in terms of keeping time, and the face looks fine to my eye, but the movement is not nearly so nicely finished as in your video (and other photos I've recently studied). Oh well, live and learn.
@@ClickSpringReview Thanks very much but I am in the USA. I've had it for so long and that it has a nice slightly-worn quality to it, and apparently its worth essentially nothing so I'll just keep wearing the doggone thing until it stops working, then I'll get a proper one. I bought it used from a jeweler in NJ in 2006 or so and never gave it a second thought. Apparently they're no longer in business. I'm not a watch collector; I just like that particular model. Anyhow it's just one of those things; at least it's just a watch and not a medical setback or something!
Thank you for this honest review, I appreciate a long term review.
Cheers Sir its a watch I still love to this day 👍🏻 ps I need to start doing more long term reviews
Just "found" this Panerai. Seems like the perfect one to get.
Its a great model from Panerai they should never of discontinued it beautiful COSC spec movement and lightweight case ,what's not to like
@@ClickSpringReviewdo you know if they replaced with a hacking movement? I was all set to hunt for one of these when noticed your review. Hate not having a hacking movement
@@Hofology I guess them may of but my one has been disconnected for a long time now I person don't mind it as when the power is down if you apply some backwards pressure to the crown you can get it to hack . My friend just got a expensive Vacheron Constantin overseas and that doesn't hack either and nor does my Pequignet and thinking about not sure my Corum does
Great in depth review of a awesome watch.
Thank you.
Thanks P glad you enjoyed it, As you can see I really like the watch
I just recently acquired a gently used 112 from 05. It’s running near perfectly from what I can see as its only a two hander. But I find myself gravitating to it, I rarely wear anything else..
I prefer the older models as the newer ones I hear lots of horror stories about movement finishing and poor quality
Brilliant piece. My 176 says hi!
Excellent and Hi Fvw welcome abroad
WOW, this is so unusual to see a 177.
Same decision here, sandwich dial, 44mm luminor case and manual winding. The 111 was to heavy on my wrist. The PAM177 weight makes is perfect. The watch does not feel thick, but it is. The curved lugs and the 44mm are playing a trick. My shirts are telling a different story.
IBecause of the size, i dont wear the PAM often anymore.
True you don't see that many anymore I prefer this to many of the new ones to be fair
I’m so glad it’s not a Rolex. This is my grail watch. I’ve decided to sell my collection to fund one .
I still love this one 13 years on after buying it
Hi, fantastic watch. can i ask if you use the Panerai tubes on your aftermarket straps? if not are the spring bars ample to keep the strap solid on the lugs?
Hi sir on the aftermarket strap's I use some tubes I picked up of eBay many years back but you can get away without them
pam177의 무게를 알려주는 영상은 이게 유일합니다. 감사합니다.
선생님 도움이 되어 기쁘네요 ☺️
Its a man's watch 🎉, for real men.
My wife wears it all the time it's her favourite watch and she has tiny little 6 inch wrists 👍🏻
Great video, thank you for sharing. If you want to sell this PAM 177, please let me know (I’m serious)!
Thanks Mat but its a keeper :)
Nice whats the strap? Thanks
Hi the black strap is from a strap maker in Scotland he posts world wide and only costs around £30 here is his email address john.keiller@gmail.com
@@ClickSpringReview thanks 😊
'Panenai'?
Well spotted and sorted thanks
I like panerai it’s just so expensive 🤷🏻♂️
I got this new back in the day for £3350 even today you can pick up a new for around £4.3k or 5k USD
Not bad what I paid for my breitling super avenger back 2006 a little less
@@NICKVST TheSuper Avenger Chronomat Evolution 2 but sold it years a go was a great watch really enjoyed it but didn't like the bracelet and always had it on a Toshi leather strap ,
I am very very tempted to go buy this watch after seeing your review :)
Cool video, i had a 177, and ended up wearing jt with the black rubber panerai strap. Its pretty cool, but i actually would have preferred a steel one if it had a little extra weight to it, this one was too light for me!
If you talk with your hands, keep them empty.
I spoke to many of my subscribers and they said they prefer the way I do it, compared with static shots Pete
@@ClickSpringReview Why democracy fails LOL
Over 10k subscribers would disagree with you chap but each to there own I guess
I am so bummed. The PAM 117 I've owned for years and paid a goodly amount for is, I am almost certain, fake. It's dead accurate in terms of keeping time, and the face looks fine to my eye, but the movement is not nearly so nicely finished as in your video (and other photos I've recently studied). Oh well, live and learn.
Nooooo what a nightmare I'f your based in the UK I could take a look at it for you
@@ClickSpringReview Thanks very much but I am in the USA. I've had it for so long and that it has a nice slightly-worn quality to it, and apparently its worth essentially nothing so I'll just keep wearing the doggone thing until it stops working, then I'll get a proper one. I bought it used from a jeweler in NJ in 2006 or so and never gave it a second thought. Apparently they're no longer in business. I'm not a watch collector; I just like that particular model. Anyhow it's just one of those things; at least it's just a watch and not a medical setback or something!