Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
War Thunder //In-VR - A6M2 Mod 11 | Air Combat Simulation
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 02. 2021
- Check out my designs and help support the channel!
MAGZWEAR on Teespring: teespring.com/...
If you would like to help support the channel directly,
Please consider donating a small amount on Patreon or Subscribe Star:
►► / magztv
►► www.subscribes...
Join my Discord server at:
►► discordapp.com...
Find me on,
►► Twitch: / magzgtv
►► Facebook: MagzGTV
►► Twitter: Magz@MagzGTV
For Business Inquiries please email: MagzGTVBusiness@Gmail.com
System Specs:
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core
M-Board: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI
RAM: Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 64GB (2x32GB) 3200MHz
GPU: MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio 10GB
HOTAS: - Virpil T-50CM2
Flight Pedals: Thrustmaster T.Flight
HMD: HP Reverb G2 Virtual Reality Headset
G'day guys, Nothing much to add today just wanted to say I hope you are all having a good one!
1 am in California but let's gooo
Just rediscovered your channel after picking up WT again, glad to see your still going strong!
Great fly'n ...
Would Love to see D9 if possible...
Yeah I'm doing pretty ok, only just started the exams. 2nd one down
please can you do a video or something on your VR settings. my Vr in this game looks so blurry and Yours looks so nice.
Fun fact: the guns on the zero were activated from the throttle with the left hand with a bicycle break like triger! With the thumb, on the throttle as well, the pilot could select 7.7 only or 7.7 plus 20mm.
Very interesting. You know more random facts about it?
@@kestrel16c32 the flaps and landing gear controls are in a very inconvinient place, right of the pilot down and almost behind him! Not the most ergonomic feature!
@@matydrum Thx dude. My favorite warbird. So I can't get enough of that.
@@kestrel16c32 You're welcome buddy, watch this you'l see everything I was talking about and more: czcams.com/video/CqjzkUSpqsw/video.html
@@kestrel16c32 I think you'l enjoy this serie as well: czcams.com/video/3H_9iR7zvMk/video.html
wasn't calling dibs on any of the enemy's with the smoke there, was just having fun with it, had a good time flying
bah, have you dibs anyway. It's not like I'm flying to grind, I'm flying because I want to.
@@MagzGTV im not grinding either, games no fun when grinding
@@manofbias8113 I feel like a lot of people playing warthunder seem to to forget this and the part of having fun. oh and grinding a lot easier when you forget about it and have fun.
@@zavdan7682 Your absolutely right, players are so focused on the destination, that they forget about the journey, the journey being the gameplay and the destination being top tier. Point is: if the journey isn't fun then the destination isn't worth it, no matter how good the destination might seem, its all about how you get there
1:27 I'm reminded of Jingles saying, "... and idiots _always_ turn fight Zeroes and Spitfires..."
But that thing seems to be a CW-21. It is a better turner than even a Zero
I just tried VR with the quest for the first time, in RB test flight, it's great. Now I need to dust off the ol' joystick and look up sim binds
Getting my setup done as well. Wondering if certain nations/planes are better for vr than others though.
@@MoleUK1 Not really, there is no advantage in that way in VR just fly what you enjoy.
@@MoleUK1 only difference would be nations that didn't have bubbe cockpits as you would be able to lean to the side to properly check your 6.
Funny thing that low fuel warning... in the Zero's you can just set the tanks to full and not worry about fuel for the rest of the EC match. It's not like the added weight suddenly enables Spitfires or some such to outrate(turnrate) you, you're still one of the most agile things in the sky... and anything more agile is on your side anyway. ^^
In a Zero, and by extension a lot of other japanese fighters, bombers and heavy fighters, you have all the time in the world to position yourself exactly right for an attack... unlike Spitfire's(especially Griffons) or 109's who have to watch the fuel clock constantly. ^^
Oh, here's a theory supported by lots of ingame evidence witnessed by myself and lots of other players over the years...
Full fuel tanks actually reduce the chance of being set on fire. It's fuel vapors in half empty tanks and outside leaking tanks that catch fire and/or explode, not the fuel in the tank. Of course, if the fuel tank gets perforated, then all bets are off again.
Since they confirmed they are reworking the Zero's 3D model eventually (hopefully sooner rather than later), and if models like the P-47's are anything to go by, I bet the VR experience its going to be great.
As long as they don't bork the Zeroes supercharger modeling like they did with the P-47s turbosupercharger modeling.
A6M2 Mod.11 in VR seems like a game of its own. Really fun to watch.
That series of engagements looked great, the VR adds a realistic feel to the video. Also, the initial takeoff looked more like a movie clip than game.
Dead stick landing! Well done! :) If you love te zero i found some great japanese aces interviews on yt, easy to find and incredible stuff!
I've probably watched them all over the years, even got to sit in on a few live interviews. :)
@@MagzGTV Nice! 😁
The LOD in this game is funny, it is hilariously easy to spot targets. Sort of the opposite extreme of DCS... And sweet landing! When you showed the 1:30 fuel - nuh uh! lol
It seem like no one but magz knows what an Immelmann or a split s or hammer head is all they do is go in circles
This was a really fun vid to watch! The Zero is a joy to fly! I made a bunch of sim vids of fun dogfights. I can't get enough!
Very nice landing!
Great episode as usual magz haha I have same ringtone and thought my phone was going off
have not played war thunder for a few years now. Glad to see some things never change. Stronk russian plane.
Nice flying - as always! 👍🏻
Regarding the poll, I said YT, but any platform will do as long as its not 60fps. Personally, I don't understand why would anyone prefer higher frame rate over higher resolution. 1080/30 makes much more sense than 720/60 - if you don't believe it, just do the math!
Zeros are a good sim starting plane very easy to pick up and fly!
Unfortunately, easy to burn as well
Magz once again making the Crew Chief take antacids.
The Russian pilots hated the I-16. and loved the P-39. The I-16 was regulated to mainly ground support and attack because no one really wanted to fly it.
They also loved the I-16 - in Spain. It wasn't a bad plane, just outdated in 1941.
Can't wait til we get this old classic in DCS to pair up with the Corsair...
Would prefer YT, thanks Magz. Loving the VR content, looks amazing.
Very smooth, this video. Great flying in a magnificent aircraft!
I'd prefer you stream in YT as well.
What does popping smoke means? And i am using TrackIR, but i need better graphic settings, cuz when the enemy is flying low on the grounf i lose them pretty quickly. Are there some quick tipps to highlight planes better from the environment? I mean, make them better visual
Twitch streams stay up for 14 days IIRC - BUT: You can make them stay until you delete them somwhere in the options :)
It's funny to see Australian flag on Japanese Zero . Specially if you know history of World War II ...
I put my flag under the elevators on most of my aircraft, it's my little thing in game.
@@MagzGTV Thanks for response . Have a nice time & stay safe !
The most beautiful plane to fly in sim soooo easy and such fun
Gorgeous aircraft!
That was Grrrrrrrrrreat worrk
Damn I’m never this early. Always a fan of more war thunder content, but would be cool if we could see a bit more MFS content, maybe with some flight area requests.
Now that I have the HMD sorted I'm in the process of setting up to be able to record MFS and DCS world so both shouldn't be too far away. :)
I vote for CZcams steams
aussie sea fires/hurricanes were the first to have shark mouths the american flying tigers saw it and copied so good on ya
The German Condor Division pilots had sharks mouths as well
Great vid! Might have to reinstall War Thunder now that I have a rig that can pull off VR well.
Was wondering, on the topic of Squadrons since you brough it up, apparently it had issues with HOTAS on launch? Did those get fixed? I have a VKB Gladiator and TWCS throttle myself, wondering if they work.
hotas works, I've been using it since launch but it's a pain in the arse to bind more than anything. If you have patience to get it all set up you won't have any problems but otherwise it's just frustrating.
@@MagzGTV Alright, tbf I Haven't seen many sims which have a great binding system and even when it works, it's still time consuming.
Guess I'll give it a go then, thanks for the response!
VR might get me back as well. FlewWT tons back in 2013 (I think, could have been 14 as well), but I'm still stuck with only 1939 airframes and always had been thrown into matches with 1944 enemies. That's literally a difference like fighting 109Es with a Sopwith Camel or F-4 Phantoms with a 262 XD - I just hope they changed that because literally everyone hated the matchmaking back then really hard.
You mind flying the F84G? Especially the french version
youtube is nicer for steams as you can scrub the video or let it buffer, so not a second lost for people who are late to a stream or have a slow connection
Enjoying your content whatever really. My only qualm has been the twighlight/sunset battles. The are awfully pretty but I find it very difficult to see your targets.
I wish tank mode had decent VR support
The tank mode works pretty much just as well, the only issue is in a tank you need to be able to look around quickly, especially the way WT is played so while VR doesn't really have any major advantages or disadvantages over a screen with trackIR in air sim in terms of the ability to see, it is a significant disadvantage against those who can just press C and snap the mouse cam 180 degrees in under a second in tank sim.
@@MagzGTV Actually if you look at a certain place in tank VR for too long then the turret follows you, personally i think it's poorly implemented for tanks and could be improved greatly
@@codemy666 I know that, but the turret following isn't the issue I was pointing out. in VR if you want to say. . look behind your tank you need to look over your shoulder or turn around. . . that's how VR works and it takes as long as it takes you to make that physical action. On a screen I can press see and flick my mouse to make the same movement in less than a second.
While in aircraft looking with mouse is a little difficult as you need to still fly the plane and track IR and VR are about on par with head checking (TIR is a little faster due to being less than 1:1 movement) it's all close enough to be little to no advantages. In WT tank sim however the difference in time it takes to check your rear is the time it takes to aim and shoot.
@@MagzGTV That disadvantage would be worth it if it was better invented, vr is a niche enough on it's own and it gets worse when you speak of tanks, i don't mind being in a disadvantage because honestly i find the game more fun that way and it adds to the gameplay
@@codemy666 "That disadvantage would be worth it if it was better invented" - No it wouldn't, the thing is WT is not a sim especially not in tanks. It's a competitive combat game with twitch gaming elements, reaction times are everything in tank sim and VR simply slows you down too much.
To change that you wouldn't just need to "improve VR implementation" You would need to completely gut and redesign the whole of War thunders ground battles. . . all of it, not just sim but all game modes since they are all based on the same core game design. i.e. WT tank sim is just WT tank RB with markers disabled and the view locked at the zoomed in position. WT tank RB is just WT tank arcade with more limited spawns and a lower movement speed modifier and enemy markers turned off. from a gameplay mechanics stand point they are otherwise identical.
If you want a tank sim that you can play in VR WT isn't and never will be it, you would be better off looking at IL-2's tank crew or hoping for VR integration in one of the new upcoming tank sims.
Please stream on youtube you can upload those streams without them getting taken down .
Zero in dcs freaking when.
Zeros are waaayyy too fun to fly in sim.
So if I click the box that says vr mode on the wt startup screen what does it do ? Does it automatically optimize the settings for vr no matter the preset graphic performance? I’m running a 2070 super And in vr the texture quality looks like its in lowest setting .kind of reminds me of those Dave n busters arcade games with the early 2000s texture quality.any help would be appreciated.
Are you sure its not the limitation of the headset resolution? I know the recorded video ends up looking better than what you look at through the goggles.
Luke Troftgruben it might be I’m running oculus rift s.
@@kwilliams3161 There is a bunch of tweaking you can do outside of factory specs. But that requires you to do your research on what your rig can handle. That or wait for VR tech to improve. GL,
You tube works for me
Yo I play SIM a lot and I notice you like SIM props, if you ever wanna make a collab video, maybe a SIM versus video with props I would be honored to collab with you!!
There was a serious lack of Magz death in this video... I am disappointed
stream on youtube plz
Please use CZcams for your videos, I don't use twitch.
It always blows me away that players enjoy war thunder. The graphics are amazing but flight pbysics and damage model are horrible. You have decent flight and gunnery skills, have you tried the more simulator sims ? . Im genuinely curious what draws players to these games? Is it the instant action? Graphics? A combination of both? War Thunder is extremely popular.. it would just be nice to see more playersake the jump to more realistic sims as well. Cheers!
Janes WWII Squadrons was fantastic, Aces High isn’t much of a slouch, IL2 is great, and DCS is nigh on perfect
@@tyvernoverlord5363 Il2 Cliffs of Dover is good along with the new expansion Desert Wings Tobruk Morth African theater. As well as the IL2 BOS series. Starting to get back into DCS as well.
G'day mate, It's clear you have never viewed my channel or any of my content before so welcome. So to answer.
"You have decent flight and gunnery skills, have you tried the more simulator sims ?" you should have taken a look at my channel, if you had you probably would have noticed some rather large playlists that include IL-2 (Great battles, flying circus, CLoD and 1946), Rise of Flight, DCS World and Microsoft Flight simulator. . . I think I even have a few X plane videos floating about as well among some other sims here and there. I play other sims very often infact my very last video was IL-2 Flying Circus and my next is likly to be a great battles multiplayer compellation.
As for "I'm genuinely curious what draws players to these games?" well that's probably because it's fun. . . not everything has to be hyper realistic and not everyone wants something that is all the time.
"War Thunder is extremely popular." - It is, it's player base is several times larger than most other combat flight sims combined, this is largely because it's easily accessible and easy to learn and fly, that makes it more fun than a hardcore sim where a player can spend 10 minutes just starting the aircraft before they can even taxi.
"it would just be nice to see more playersake the jump to more realistic sims as well" - Indeed, that's why I started the Unprofessionals, it's a multiplayer community intended to provide a fun gaming space for new players looking at getting into fligth sims, We have IL-2 and DCS servers and also do MSFS2020 flyouts from time to time, Weekly events, a discord server and an extremely active community.
But the thing is, not everyone wants to fly a more realistic sim, and no matter how much fun you or I may find it others will frankly find them flat boring.
Also, I've found that the sim community is it's worst enemy, In the eight years I have been covering flight simulation on youtube I have seen countless sim pilots talking down to war thunder players, being frankly rude to them for simply liking WT and not flying the sim they prefer.
In the process of doing that the simulation community has largely generated a reputation among the players of soft sims and flight games like WT as being a pack of arseholes. It's something I have to constantly fight against and it kind of drives me nuts that people that do look down on games such as WT can't understand that they are often the reason players don't want to midgrate, after all would you want to fly in a community that hates you for enjoying yourself on a game they didn't like for no other reason than it didn't meet there standard?
Been doing what I can in this regard but it's an uphill battle, anyways. Welcome to the channel.
@@MagzGTV Thanks for the reply.. Sorry if I came off as rude it wasnt my intentions at all. As far as talking down to WT players.. thats not my style. Some people play flight sims for " the game" and some people play the Sim for "realism". I jjst happen to be in the latter category. When i play, I want the experience to be as close as I can get it to what some teenage or early 2s kid felt when crawling into that aircraft. Like i said before i was genuinely intrested on what draws people to WT. Its player base is huge. The "Sim" crowd isnt near as big and you probably answered why.. by us being the way you precieved. Sorry I came off the way I did, it wasnt intentional. I act5 work very hard in trying to break the perception of "Sim" players and offer my time qhite a bit to help and draw new players to the genre. You are right, that I havent checke5 out hour page first before commenting.. your video popped up in my recommendations and i posted. Thanks for the insight and I will check out your other videos. Cheers
@@ribbs67 No need to apologies mate, I was simply answering your questions as honestly as I can, and yes that is the core of it.
The main reason soft sims and flight games are larger and will always be larger in size than flight and study sims is that the majority of people flying are not looking for realism, they are looking for the movie moment, they want to feel like maverick from top gun or the aces from the Battle of Britain for 5 minutes or so then go on with there lives and other interests.
I too enjoy a sim as realistic as it can be but I understand there point of view and as with this video quite often enjoy a nice layed back flight in WT myself for those reasons.
People only looking for this feeling are unlikely to really progress into summing as that's not what they are looking for and that's cool.
The second issue is lesser but it is the sim community itself, while it absolutely needs new blood to grow and expand, many of those in it seem hellbent on gate keeping. A quick look over the forums of both IL-2 and especially DCS will show you how bad this is and sadly it often does turn people away. This is a larger issue and in my opinion a major factor in why combat flight simulation is the smallest flight sim demographic, even MSFS2020 despite only being a few months old has more active stable players than the current mix of combat flight sims combined, and I think that's because the gatekeeping in civil aviation simulations is so much smaller than in combat sims.
After years of doing this I don't really have a solution to the second problem other than expanding my own Unprofessional community, encouraging people to come in and fly, fight, do stupid shit, crash and otherwise just have fun free from the gate keeping. But I'm only one person with one community in the mass that is the combat flight sim community as a whole. . . . I think there needs to be a shift in thinking if combat flight simming is to ever get big like it was in the late 90's, but I'm not sure we'll ever see that.