If you don't mind reading some dry text, Last's is pretty good too. It tells you all the surgical access of body parts. However, you might want to read it with an atlas, just so you can get your heads around.
Could you make a video showing how you use these texts to prepare for a case, like an appy or chole? Would be a great how to for residents and students.
Full transparency I haven’t used thieme for study or reference but I have gone through it. While the plates have certainly enough detail for studying anatomy and surgical reference; ok my opinion, it just lacks the beauty of Netter. For that reason alone I lean toward Netter not only as a reference but something to admire and enjoy.
@@citizensurgeon As a medical student, trying to start putting more emphasize on understanding anatomy, which of the 4 books would you recommend to start off with?
Thanks F S, great case based anatomy, that's a great question. The best I could find is @DRmiteshdave35 - hopefully that helps! Looks like he has some great content! Sorry for delayed reply.
is Netter enough for studying in first year? like I loved the diagrams you showed in netter but does it also describe them in texts or not? I mean for example there is a diagram for the ligaments of lower limb, is the connections between ligaments and these stuff written or not? thank you so much it's really helpful
For me the best anatomy textbook is grays anatomy Moore's is great but grays has more details and explanation and also a better graphics Of course I’m talking about grays anatomy for students because there is another grays anatomy but for surgeons and anatomists which is much bigger , this one definitely is not for study
@@adorp I think Moore’s has greater details in the introduction part but the rest grays is more detailed Especially the head and neck is best described in grays
@@taashin2863 Yes, head and neck is okay in baby Gray, but I will not call it outstanding. The cranial nerves section is rudimentary. Tooth is glanced over, and I could not find a single cross section of the neck. Without a cross section, it is hard to realize just how much of the neck is pure muscles. Also, lungs section is the worst.
@@adorp The cranial nerves were described in the beginning of the chapter briefly Because it will be described in its corresponding sites better For example you will find detailed description of Cranial nerves III , IV , VI and V1 of trigeminal nerve in the anatomy of orbit And the V2 in the pterygoid fossa while V3 in the infratemporal fossa The intra temporal part facial nerve is best described in the anatomy of ear while the facial part is in the face anatomy Yes the teeth were glanced over but yet the rest of oral cavity was good There might not be cross sectional image of the neck but in return the description of the neck was more detailed Grays usually describes the the course and the branches of nerves and vessels in more depth than most other anatomy books it also giving you the relation of these structures with each other and finally it frequently mentions some anatomical variations of some regions And so on .. as you see gray is purely regional anatomy book and should be used in this way which makes it better for those interesting in surgery
@@taashin2863 Well, yes.... I found that part. still didn't find all the info though. I compared the info on CN V1 in both books. In Grey, I couldn't find the list of sub-branches (like infratrochlear). Sure, it is not a vital information that a junior doctor must know. What is important however, is the knowledge that CN V1 is what causes the corneal blinking reflex, which is clearly mentioned in Moore. But I cound not find it in Baby Grey. The rest of the info (sensation zones, lesions and their findings) are equal. Also, Grey repeats a lot.
My A&P course coming up is basic college level. It looks like the course goes into systems not regions. Should my atlas I buy match the systems layout or is it best to go with regions layout to see the connections between systems?
If you don't mind reading some dry text, Last's is pretty good too. It tells you all the surgical access of body parts. However, you might want to read it with an atlas, just so you can get your heads around.
Agree, I loved Last’s anatomy when I was a student, dry but excellent, thanks for engaging!
Could you make a video showing how you use these texts to prepare for a case, like an appy or chole? Would be a great how to for residents and students.
Wow, that’s a cool idea, yes, let me see how I could do that!!
awesome, thanks for the nice video and explanations!
Thank you for your guidance, doctor.
Absolutely! So happy you’ve enjoyed it
For illustrative atlas, how would you compare Thieme to Netters?
Full transparency I haven’t used thieme for study or reference but I have gone through it. While the plates have certainly enough detail for studying anatomy and surgical reference; ok my opinion, it just lacks the beauty of Netter. For that reason alone I lean toward Netter not only as a reference but something to admire and enjoy.
@@citizensurgeon As a medical student, trying to start putting more emphasize on understanding anatomy, which of the 4 books would you recommend to start off with?
@@princetonyeohtzehuang1954 I recommend Moore’s clinically oriented anatomy and Netters anatomy atlas
Great video. Could you recommend a good resource for case-based clinical (applied) anatomy Q/A (Q bank) for medical students?
Thanks F S, great case based anatomy, that's a great question. The best I could find is @DRmiteshdave35 - hopefully that helps! Looks like he has some great content! Sorry for delayed reply.
is Netter enough for studying in first year? like I loved the diagrams you showed in netter but does it also describe them in texts or not? I mean for example there is a diagram for the ligaments of lower limb, is the connections between ligaments and these stuff written or not? thank you so much it's really helpful
I don’t think so, I think you need a companion descriptive text live Moore’s clinical anatomy, Netter is enough for an atlas
Thanks doctor
Thanks doctor
For me the best anatomy textbook is grays anatomy
Moore's is great but grays has more details and explanation and also a better graphics
Of course I’m talking about grays anatomy for students because there is another grays anatomy but for surgeons and anatomists which is much bigger , this one definitely is not for study
Are you sure Baby Gray has more detail than Moore's? I just gave in to the hype, bought it, and I hate it. It contains nothing.
@@adorp
I think Moore’s has greater details in the introduction part but the rest grays is more detailed
Especially the head and neck is best described in grays
@@taashin2863 Yes, head and neck is okay in baby Gray, but I will not call it outstanding. The cranial nerves section is rudimentary. Tooth is glanced over, and I could not find a single cross section of the neck. Without a cross section, it is hard to realize just how much of the neck is pure muscles.
Also, lungs section is the worst.
@@adorp
The cranial nerves were described in the beginning of the chapter briefly Because it will be described in its corresponding sites better
For example you will find detailed description of Cranial nerves III , IV , VI and V1 of trigeminal nerve in the anatomy of orbit
And the V2 in the pterygoid fossa while V3 in the infratemporal fossa
The intra temporal part facial nerve is best described in the anatomy of ear while the facial part is in the face anatomy
Yes the teeth were glanced over but yet the rest of oral cavity was good
There might not be cross sectional image of the neck but in return the description of the neck was more detailed
Grays usually describes the the course and the branches of nerves and vessels in more depth than most other anatomy books it also giving you the relation of these structures with each other and finally it frequently mentions some anatomical variations of some regions
And so on .. as you see gray is purely regional anatomy book and should be used in this way which makes it better for those interesting in surgery
@@taashin2863 Well, yes.... I found that part.
still didn't find all the info though. I compared the info on CN V1 in both books. In Grey, I couldn't find the list of sub-branches (like infratrochlear). Sure, it is not a vital information that a junior doctor must know. What is important however, is the knowledge that CN V1 is what causes the corneal blinking reflex, which is clearly mentioned in Moore. But I cound not find it in Baby Grey.
The rest of the info (sensation zones, lesions and their findings) are equal. Also, Grey repeats a lot.
My A&P course coming up is basic college level. It looks like the course goes into systems not regions. Should my atlas I buy match the systems layout or is it best to go with regions layout to see the connections between systems?
Great question, I’d get a systems based book to follow the curriculum and if down the line you want something different then supplement
I love this
So awesome glad to help!
Can you pls tell a book which has easy english anatomy
I think the best bet is one of the atlases like Netters or a Photographic atlas, Zollingers is another great one for surgical anatomy!
@@citizensurgeon have these books easy english to understand
Thanks
Glad you enjoyed it!
Sir which book best for neuroanotomy only
Have you had the chance to check this out? Great neuroanatomy resource!
www.neuroanatomy.ca/
@@citizensurgeon thanks sir i will check this source I need a nuroanotomy book please recommend me ...
Thansks
You are welcome!