Swapping From 4K to 1440p - The Pros Were Right!
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 06. 2024
- Highly recommend the high-end KTC G27P6!
Amazon: bit.ly/4dAa3ps
KTC Web: bit.ly/4bb033Q
Europre: bit.ly/3WK8aQZ
Newegg: bit.ly/3UIoOxY
Setup Product Links:
Grovemade Desk Shelf - bit.ly/3HHPmcU (CODE MINIMALISTECH FOR 10% OFF)
Floating Light Bulb - geni.us/FloatingLightBulb
PS5 SLIM - geni.us/PS5-SLIM
Controller Wall Mount - geni.us/Controller-WallMount
M2 MacBook Air - geni.us/M2-MacBookAir
BenQ Thunderbolt 4 Dock - geni.us/BenQ-Dock
NUPHY AIR KEYBOARD - geni.us/nuphyair
Monitor Light Bar - geni.us/XIAOMI-LIGHTBAR
BLACK LAMP "TARNABY" - www.ikea.com
RAZER OROCHI - geni.us/RAZER-OROCHI
GOVEE LAMP - geni.us/Govee-RGB-Lamp
ART PRINTS - sandgrainstudio.com
ESPRESSO MACHINE - geni.us/Breville_Espresso
Purchasing through affiliate links directly support this channel.Thank you!
Thanks for watching!
Javier
⚪️For Business - minimalistech.21@gmail.com
⚫️SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE - czcams.com/channels/IU5.html...
⚪️FOLLOW ME ON INSTAGRAM - / mnmls.tech
As an Amazon Affiliate, I may earn a commission when items are purchased using my link, thank you!
1440P for shooters is definitively the sweet spot. Warzone and Battlefield here.
Да консольщикам без разницы на чём играть. Им разработчики помогают. Там авто аим. Автонаведение на цель.
CSGO and valorant here, 1440p helps a lot even in those games, also apex.
off course
I believe the professionals play on 1080p
100% agree only noob fps players playing at 4k
Depends on the game. For large games like battle royals where you need to see at a great distance or games like battlefield a higher resolution is essentially to detecting objects at a distance. The vast majority of them play games like cs where the maps aren’t that large so 1080p is the choice.
@@zergtoss11440p ain't that much heavier than 1080p with much better picture clarity on cs the norm was 4:3 not 1080p but now it's common to see them at 1440p
I believe professionals don’t play games
@@zergtoss1 PUBG pros still playing at 1080p woth all very low resoultion in game
Idk man, I want 4k as my next monitor. I have seen 4k at my friends house and I can’t unsee it, so crisp and clear, detailed image is what I liked ❤️
Was it 27 or 32 inches?
@@MrSham3less 28, but I want 32. I am sure it will look fantastic too.
@@daniil3815should look around the same as a 27 qhd
If u get a 24 qhd u will get a rly crisp image aswell
@@daniil3815 i now got the samsung g8 240hz 4k for 3 weeks now and it has a damn good display
I had a 27 inch 4k monitor and sold it because it honestly wasn't a night and day difference like 1080p to 1440p for me, but there definitley was a night and day difference in fps loss, 32 inches you pretty much have to go 4k however to get a good image but 24-27 inch 1440p is best imo.
As somebody who recently upgraded from a five year old ultra wide where I was split the screen between CZcams any other other half being gaming to now a 42 inch C3 4K monitor! I’ve recently been debating going back to a smaller 1440p screen for this exact reason!
I went from 1080 to 1440p to 4k and yes 1440p is great but man 4k is so crisp and clean and in game its better. For me I'm more of a solo player and prefer single player games so 4k 60+ is perfect for me I try 1440 again recently and couldn't stay with it
I used to play overwatch competitively and now I just do some ranked in valorant, cs2, etc since I have a full time job now but all I know is BenQ/Zowie so if I’m looking to get a solid monitor upgrade, would you recommend a 1440p OLED or should I try one of the newer Zowie models?
I have a video on the 1080 240hz Zowie with DYAC2 a couple weeks back.
It was about on par with a 240hz OLED for motion blurring etc. I thiiiiink a 360hz OLED might be better,
If I had to pick overall, i lean OLED mainly for the other use-case and I still prefer 1440p.
Side question - I’m tempted to try valorant but i heard the learning curve is ruthless, is this true?
@@MinimalisTech oh dope then I think then I’ll probably get myself a 360hz OLED!! I heard you say some great things about the Gigabyte one a few days back as well.
Side answer - I came directly from overwatch so the slower pace in valorant took some getting used to but there’s some general things that carry over like character roles, hard and soft counters, knowing who plays well on each map.
The most confusing thing for me when learning was how to manage the money you get after each round and which weapons to buy but after a handful of games you get a better understanding of it. I think one of the things that deters people is the lack of a good tutorial and the way the game starts you with really high sensitivity and a terrible crosshair but you’re able to customize both to fit you.
If you do end up checking it out and have any questions or would like some tips or anything I’d be more than happy to help!!
@@MinimalisTechwhat about the 540hz from ASUS or benQ, I have the ASUS version it’s insane.
@@icyvolts I haven’t been able to get either here up in Canada :( unsure yet. I’d love to check those out tho
Once you experience the fast response time of OLED it’s honestly hard to go back. .003ms is definitely noticeable. Soooooo smooth
Went from something interesting to a monitor review.....lol....
KTC has a killer selection of panels, looking more at their Mini-LED options due to color accuracy in the DCIP/Adobe plus the price is hard to fight - nice to see them adding OLED's to the mix but I'm waiting on that. 40-series cards are definitely a game changer with the DLAA/DLSS frame-gen available to them (glad I waited to snag a 4070Ti Super when I did, my 1080Ti can finally rest after 7yrs).
Hi. I have RX7800xt. I have 32' 4k monitor 60 hz. I Play on it using fsr and have around 60 FPS. I thinking about change the monitor to 1440p 32' 160 and play without fsr on native ressolution. You recommend? Theo games will be look better on native 1440p?
Yes. I found 1440p 144hz so much better than 60hz 4k and it looks almost as good besides close up textures you won't notice the difference much
Gaming in 4k is justified only on TV and I did it myself before I sold my 4090 (now I game on the same tv in lower resolutions using my 5L build with 4060 low profile).
Doing 4k gaming on 27" monitor is mental.
Holy shit that Tom Delong signature is sick!
Why not just get a better KTC G27P6 in the form of the AW2725DF or the Aorus FO27Q3 with 360Hz refresh rate, or the upcoming LG 480Hz OLED?
I actually have the LG 480hz. Love it to bits but I CANNOT figure out why I’m not as good on the dual mode. Legit can’t. I tried out my old LG monitor for 27” 1440p but KTC offered to send me out this for this project.
My buddy was the first to suggest trying 1440p on 27 again so i gave it a go. I had a loaner 360hz gigabyte which was sweet but I had to send it back :(
55 INCH 4K TCL Q7 tv is awesome!!! never felt so real with the life like size! only 500 at best buy!
Great video! Do you have any thoughts on running 1440p on a 32 inch monitor, maybe due to GPU limitations?
1440p will tax your GPU regardless of display size. That said 32” 1440p will be a bit less sharp due to the same resolution being stretched larger. That said I’ve used LOTS of 32” 1440p monitors and have zero issue personally with that for gaming. Productivity wise it’s a bit more noticeable on text and stuff but otherwise it’s no issue for gaming
Cheers!
I have and use the dell s3220dgf. It is 32" 1440 at 5ms and it is beautiful. I will stick with 32" @1440 with any display i buy. 4k is probably great but until video cards can handle that reso east, 1440p for me.
1440p at 24" is the way trust, i got the first one on the market made by aoc and it amazing
you prefer this over the lg c2 42"?
I went from 4k 60hz with a subpar TN panel to a much more color accurate and faster 1440p 165hz, and I'll take high refresh rate over resolution everyday, even though 4k was incredibly sharp. (Both are about the same size monitors).
1080p on high end systems creates a huge CPU bottleneck, so I think 1440p is a good balance.
Sounds like LG 850 display 😉
hello. can you explain why 1080p creates a huge CPU bottleneck on high end systems? i don't understand the logic behind it. shouldn't it be faster on a lower resolution?
@mertates1013 What that means is your frame rate will be the liming factor because the GPU is not at 100%. Games need CPUs to be able to have a chance to process so many frames especially on competitive shooters.
@@C0Y0TE3 thanks for explaining mate, have a nice day
I recently built a new rig when the 4080 super lunches went with that and the 7800x3d for 360hz 1080p gaming just to realize I need a 2k 360hz oled to keep up with my pc now it’s to fast 😂
Get the pg27aqn I guess lol, sounds like you have the money, maybe I'm wrong though, if not then 2k 240hz is still better IMO.
My 4080 super will last a lot longer at 1440p. I get to crank up the settings, even on the games that are difficult to renderwith ray tracing occasionally and still get high frame rates. On consoles, there's a great argument for 1440p as well because a lot of open world games render closer to 1440p on performance modes than 4k, so you'll always have a sharp image with the 1440p monitor.
throwing it back to your other review: 32gs95ue gives me the 1080p I need for high fps on cs2 yet is the perfect one screen software engineer solution. I couldn't see myself using one 27"
It really depends on the types of games you play and at what viewing distance. I think the new 4k 32 inch Oled monitors with 240 hz is the best. I can still get high refresh on shooters and get immersion on everything else. For me I like the best of both worlds and yes it takes a very high end build but I buy nice not twice. Currently using lg c2 42 inch and have debating on one of the new 32 inch 4k oleds but I game mostly on controller but depends on the game really. To each their own. My friends preach about 27 inch 1440p but yet I still smoke them in shooters. I do understand but let’s be real most people aren’t e sports pros. I’ve been enjoying more immersive games lately than the same old , cod, destiny, Fortnite etc….. so I still get well over 165 FPS in 4k on those titles in 4k.
i have this monitor, love it. no reason to spend more unless you want a higher refresh rate or resolution. the ABL is the only aggravating thing when trying to do work on it, but it's not a big deal and it's absolutely no factor in games.
I’ve been super happy with a dual setup 24in 1080p 240hz which I main for apex competitively and 24in 1440p 60hz (75hz oc) for every non gaming application, as well as, any game I rather have that added resolution. 24in is just my preference and there’s hardly any 1440p monitors that are 24in that’s why I don’t mind the lower hz on it it’s good enough for single players
7800X3D system so @1080 I got all the frames. I used to have a 27in 1440p 180hz monitor but genuinely I was worse due to how close I get it was very uncomfortable at times. Oled is endgame imo but too expensive for me and not necessary at all as well
I would love a 24in 1440p oled even if it’s only 60hz that would be sick for single players since I like a seamless dual setup and like I said 27in just too big
I actually was a 24 inch enjoyer as well until I got a deeper desk and I like 27 inch better now, but if you just sit close naturally not because of the desk then I fully understand and honestly don't understand why companies are barely doing 24-25 inch 1440p, it should be a thing, it doesn't need to be neglected lol, I'm sure a lot of people including me at one point want this.@@Pikkoroo
From 1080p to 1440p is a big jump and 1440p to 2160 is smaller jump, but i love playing at 4K with a very high end PC, just saying
Guys, I need help choosing between 1440p OLED or 4k IPS monitor? Which one is better?
Hello, how are you? Here reading your comment I saw yours and maybe I can give myself a hand, I have a Ps5 Slim and I want to buy a monitor to play, am I between the Gigabyte G27Q and the LG 27UL500-W? One is 1440p at 144hz and the other is 4k 60hz, which of the two do you recommend buying and why? Greetings 👋🏻
1440p at 144 if you want good looking and higher fps for your ps5 go for that one cause 4K 60 is kinda pointless unless it’s 4K 120
I have a 240hz 1440 oled LG monitor and I play at 1080p for hyper competitive cod, I immediately saw competitive improvement once I switched to 1080p and capped my frames at 180.
Just curious, why 180hz?
@@MinimalisTech I cap at 180fps because I have a 4090 and I want to limit its usage to keep it consistent. Streaming and other processes takes up a lot of my GPU power. If I didn’t stream or make content, I’d be playing at 1440p and unlimited
So when is 4K at 27 inch available, with 240hz?
That would be a better comparison
I would have to disagree and I own a dual monitors Alienware OLED 4k 240HZ 32" and Alienware LED 2k 240HZ 27" and I play shooters and care a lot about my performance on CSGo and Warzone. I will hands down pick the OLED 4K and I feel the advantage here. As for the size difference I just move this 32" a bit back and I still enjoy dominating in shooters. It seems to me no pro shooters are for real giving 4k new oled panels a true chance in competitive playing. Now I own 4090 and get around 180hz on warzone while on the 2k I get 240hz easily but still feel the crisp of 4k is a bigger advantage that is until 5090 comes out and reaching 240hz on 4k becomes more possible.
If you’re a competitive gamer and dc about being able to see every inch of dirt 1080p is the best
Thanks for the video!
Is it bad to play 1080p on a 1440p 360hz OLED? My pc can’t handle 360hz on 1440p
What's your gpu and cpu and what games you intending on playing is the key here.
lmao
@@ell1cs 4080 13700kf Apex Legends
My actual question was, is it bad to downscale resolution for any reason that isn’t obvious?
My pc can handle anything, but I prefer 1080p because I run a single pc stream and want to minimize pc latency.
@@theswagger5386 It's not necessarily bad but you can really tell when something is 1080 a lot more because of the pixel density of a 1440p monitor as opposed to a 1080p counterpart. The size makes 1080 look terrible when you drop resolution. I tested apex btw, and it locks at 300 for me at 1440p low with a 7900xt and 5800x3D.
@@ell1cs ohhh ok, thanks so much for the info! I didn’t take the size into consideration, I play on a 24 inch so 1080p isn’t an issue. But I can definitely see what you mean, probably best to go 1440 on a 27 inch.
Oled Ultrawide is something to behold.
Pretty much just waiting for the elusive msi 34cqpx at this point. Was supposed to be April then may now who knows when. Let's be honest 34" 1440 240hz is going to be preem.😊
Does VRR work on the PS5 with this monitor?
I went from an alienware 1440p 240hz 27" to a 4k oled c2 42" the imagine is great but i just cant hit my shots anymore, It feels like I have major imput lag that i just cant get used to.
Yeah dude, i think it’s something to do with mouse DPI scaling to 4K on a larger display, or maybe it’s just the screen size. Either way there was a stark difference going back to 1440p 27”. I’m lucky to have multiple setups tho I know not everyone does.
I bought a XUNDEFINED monitor, which is easy to use and has a very high cost-effectiveness.
anyone else have the 1440p to 1080p video of his from 9 months ago being recommended after this video??
They’re going back to 1440p because they’re not rocking 4090 Graphics cards. Which on my opinion the only card that makes 4K with high FPS viable.
4K will be huge with the 5000’s series cards.
few years from now hell make a video "swapping from 8k to 4k - the pros were right!" :')
1440p is definitely the best for PC
4k suits more with Consoles assuming supports 120hz
I'm not great but I definitely feel my aim has gone downhill since switching from my 1440p to my 4k 32 inch oled
Thanks for this vid good sir!
Update: “Clapping these 12-year olds in Overwatch is simply is what I need after a long day!” I’m 💀🤣💀.
i play RDR2 on my LG oled TV with a 3080TI GPU looks insane man even on 1440p the dlss makes it looks 4k
I had 3 monitors at 1440p, one ips at 170hz and two world at 240hz, and even the 240hz oleds were too limiting with its 240hz refresh rate. 390hz 1080p is better until we get those 1440p 480hz oleds.
Swapped from 32 inch 4K to 32 inch 1440p for gaming. 4k is sharper but 1440p isn’t that far behind,however ‘60fps vs 100fps is Huge.’ Honestly, budget gaming PC 1080p, mid-high range 1440p, only gamer with highest budget should go for 4k gaming.
I have been debating a 4k 32" 240hz or the aw3423dw/f 165hz and I have a 4090 already. Should I go 4k with it or go performance on 1440 ultrawide? I do play some competitive games, but it's not usually my daily game more often than not I am on singleplayer games or non-competitive games. I hear a lot of raving about the new 4k's, and I think they are a little more future proof as the aw ultrawide is already a few years behind. But 4k performance still seems behind until probably 50 series comes out.
@@dylananhorn1 If you got 4090 and want best graphic on games. I think 4K for you, just that few demanding new games with max settings may need to turn DLSS on to have 80+fps. I will go 4K with 4090, except fps is really important for you. It’s your opinion, fps vs sharpness. 4090 is a bit OP for 1440p, 4K for me.
@stevelo2057 I completely agree that 4k is better with 4090, and I have the money for my new monitor ready to go. The thing is, tho the 4k 240hz is 1000-1400$ and I prefer the ultrawide 21:9 ratio. So with the Gen 3 ultrawide coming next year as 5k2k. I am debating if it's worth spending that amount if I want to change my monitor in the next year. I definitely don't want to stick with 1080 for a whole extra year waiting. Currently, I will wait a bit longer for the msi 34cqpx, which is 2.5gen. How do you think the resell value of the 4k 240hz will be in a year?
try the 540hz pg248qp or the benq's 540hz compare to your 1440p, and let us know 😁😁😁
its the tom delonge es 335 that I like
I'm sorry 1440p looks good 4k is ok bf5 looks so sweet at 1440p
I also recently downgraded from my Sony M9 4K monitor to a LG 1440p ips display and immediately loved it so I will be getting rid of my 4K monitor. The only real difference I notice is that the screen is less bright because it’s not HDR. But the increase in performance was also immediately noticeable, which makes it 100% worth the “downgrade“ lol.
Need to upgrade the gpu not downgrade the monitor
Dont need pro gamers to tell you how the human eye works or what your own personal preference is. 😉
Next video in a year: Swapping from 8k to 4k - The Pros Were Right!
1440p vs 4k input latency from mouse to system and screen is reduced by a lot.
1080 at 160hz is all i can ever want my acer v233h is good enough i can see and game good no need for oled or 4k
Playing on a LG OLED C1 top of the line TV WITH XBOX SERIES X & PLAYING ON MY GIRLFRIEND SAMSUNG TV 4k IS FREAKING NIGHT & DAY I CAN APPRECIATE MY OLED WITH EXTREMELY MORE OPTIONS & CLEARER VISION IT COSTED 3000+ WHEN IT FIRST CAME OUT 2YRS AGO BUT ITS TUFF..
w blink guitar
I got this same exact monitor a few weeks ago! So far it’s a beautiful display and the response time is so low and motion blur is almost non existent. Overall you cant go wrong with a 1440p 240hz oled monitor. This KTC one has been around 550 to 650 on the regular on amazon
Don’t wanna sound stupid but, can’t you change the resolution on your device instead of buying a new whole monitor.
Increasing the resolution isn't the same as playing it natively. It won't look right. You can't just add pixels to a monitor through settings.
@@lsik231l No, not increase more like decrease he went from 4k to 1440. Can’t the 32in previous monitor do everything the 27in can, the only difference is the size right.
@@K-REDwhen using a lower resolution than native, the image looks blurry and just not right due to the pixel alignment of the monitor
@@K-REDwhen you have two monitors side by side, one 4k monitor and one 1440p monitor and you set the resolution of both monitors to 1440p, the native 1440p monitor will look better and more crisp than the native 4k monitor with the decreased screen resolution
4090+3440x1440p is my fav
Y im buying the LG Dual Mode Monitor u get best of both worlds 4K 240hz and with the click of a button 1080p 480hz
Wait a minute didn't your switch to 1080p a while back. 😂
haha yeah! I was promptly roasted, apparently pros have been at 1440p for a while. Lots still on 1080 tho but apparently these newer OLEDs at 240hz+ have been the way to go? I’m still trash but I’m better on 1440p 27” lol
@@MinimalisTech Pretty sure almost every Apex pro is on 1080p. A lot of them use Zowie's. Any thought's on Zowie's vs OLED's? I heard Zowie's are still better than OLED's for comp.
@@theswagger5386zowie or xg2431 from viewsonic 24in 1080p 240hz due to the effect of gpu utilization on system latency, it’s $259 typically so cheaper than zowie but just as good
@MinimalisTech, your insights are invaluable! The revelation that many professionals are transitioning to 1440p monitors was quite the eye-opener. I’ve been contemplating an upgrade for some time, and your informative content is nudging me closer to making a decision. The 1080p vs. 1440p debate is a tough one, but I’m eager to see what further wisdom you’ll share on the matter. Keep up the great work - your channel is a gem for tech enthusiasts! 👍👍
i have the c3 43 inch and the 1440 240hz oled from lg too i think the monitor is better for shooters and the c3 is better for everything else
I have the best 1080 p 24 inch IPS ultra gear panel that Lg makes. I love 24 inches. My eves strain at 27 inches.
for me is 1440p once you go 1440p you cannot go back too 1080p trust me i tried thats because some of those pros dont own a pc that can do 4k 120 i use 1440p on all my games not just shooters at least i can game on my 144 hrz at 1440p
professionals play on 1080p, lol.
Pros play at 144p at 1000 htz
If u play story games u should go for 4k
Professional in what game ?
💯💯💯
Bro that KTC monitor is $900 "on sale" ... for a 1440. You already lost.
Asus 540hz with ULMB 2 on top
What an add 😂
1080 is enough tho.
Clapping these 12yr olds sounds crazy🤣🤣
Well no shit, but it’s nice having 4K for non competitive play. You can always lower the resolution to 1440 on a 4K display…
Since ive gone to 4k 120hz qd-oled.. theres just no going back for me. Everything else looks sub par now. Ive spoiled myself into becoming that dipshit thatll pay top dollar for more fps and pixels
I got a question man. I’m interested in buying a pc for more competitive warzone play. I want an edge in reaction time compared to my Xbox. I feel like pc players react faster than me. I still want to use an Xbox controller but I want a pc to play warzone on!
It’s literally just what I prefer 😂 vid makes no sense pros use 1080 for frames that’s it that could care let’s what res is along they get there preferred frame but end of the frames won’t save u from getting stomped by a better player
If anyone trys to tell me, he sees a difference between 4k and 1440p in videogames on 27" he straight up delusional.
You can see the difference if you sit close enough as you definitely see the difference in clarity on 4k 32 inch vs 1440p 27 inch(138 vs 108 ppi). It is more crisp, but imo not worth it at all… I went back from 4k 32 to 27 1440p since it was just too big to play semi competitively.
I'm running a dual 4k setup with the Neo G7 as my main gaming panel. I have to say: pixel response times are SO fast that 165 Hz is more than enough (coming from a few QHD 240s etc.). Also, I mainly have to study and work nowadays, so 4k is far superior to me.
Also, running a 7900 XT, I am running CS2 at 4k without any upscaling at 400 1% low FPS on most maps, same goes for Valorant. Therefore, I truly don't care about performance issues with 4k in other games and find it to be the far superior resolution for me. It's just way more crisp and offers more space and flexibility for office tasks
pros play on 1080, gamers enjoy 1440. old people plays at 4k
I play on 4K on my ps5 what’s the problem with 4K 😂
Idk whats with the dislikes but i remember watching linus video that its scientifically impossible for eyes to tell the difference in 4k and 2k
it depends on how big your screen is as well, for a 27 inch screen it is impossible but for a 42 inch TV it's quite obvious
but who plays on a tv other than console people...
When i use DLDSR 1440 > 4k i can clearly see the difference… and that not even on a native 4k
@@asutora.5363 oh yeah your face would have to be right up on the screen lmao that was also in the video
@@HakenMods Same, and now imagine on 32 inches, even better! But ofc not everyone can or want 32 inches
Definetely possible its more to do with screen size and resolution combined
Instead of buying a new monitor, can't you just.... put the game settings to 1440p?
OLED is surely a good experience overall, but this seems so consumer oriented :c
4k for pro is a big nono
I have experienced difference between 1440p and 4k high refresh. I would never go back to 1440p. 4k sharpness and resolution is just way better! Don’t believe in these videos and I strongly recommend buying both and experience both. Keep the one you like and return other. Simple
And choice differs for each. Ultra competitive gamers still use 1080p super high refresh. But for majority 99%, 4k monitor is the way to go
Your video goes from why people go with a 1140p monitor to a monitor review… bruh
Nah id still go for 4k, we got upscaling nowadays so performance at 4k isnt like it used to be
Yeah! I’ve tried the new frame gen. It’s dope but response times take a hit :(
@@MinimalisTech so 1440 p it is then
Pros and try hards play 1080p. 4K only for casual sofa gaming. 8k gaming LoL.