She mentioned Hitler, so they might listen. CZcams's algorithm on the other hand, will keep their soft little ears safe from scary pro gun videos like these. You wanna flip a liberal on their head? Show them videos about Liberia! That place is terrifying.
why would they have elected politicians to think and speak for them. I mean in all of history no politician has ever had a agenda that played off the trust and ignorance of the voting people! right
When I served in the military a few decades ago, I carried an automatic M-16. It was not called an assault weapon. It was called a rifle. My AR-15 and semi-auto AK-47 both have multiple 30-round magazines, which I consider to be standard capacity.
Any issued personal arm to a military member should be quite CAPABLE of "assault". Kinda what a soldier DOES, at least under orders and IAW laws governing warfare.
@@randomnameseventythree2255 Horse shit, there's no comparison. I'm pointing out YOU blame the tool for the action of a person. Your scenario has nothing to do with tools. Of course you think if a rapist stabs a victim to death afterward it's OK because they didn't use a gun!
@@lmprdks1 Zorg Industries. The ZF-1 . It's light. Handle's adjustable for easy carrying. Undetectable by X-rays. Ideal for quick interventions. Titanium recharger, 3,000-round clip with bursts of 3 to 300. With the replay button, it's even easier. One shot... Replay sends the following shots to the same location. To finish the job, all Zorg oldies but goldies... Rocket launcher... Arrow launcher, with exploding or poisonous gas heads. Net launcher... Flame thrower... My favorite! And for the grand finale, the all new lce Cube System. -5th Element
@@mischermer4767 Zorg Industries. The ZF-1 . It's light. Handle's adjustable for easy carrying. Undetectable by X-rays. Ideal for quick interventions. Titanium recharger, 3,000-round clip with bursts of 3 to 300. With the replay button, it's even easier. One shot... Replay sends the following shots to the same location. To finish the job, all Zorg oldies but goldies... Rocket launcher... Arrow launcher, with exploding or poisonous gas heads. Net launcher... Flame thrower... My favorite! And for the grand finale, the all new lce Cube System. -5th Element
No shit if you want to fear how bad it could be imagine a shooter walk into a movie theater with a couple KSG that would be about the worse case you could get close range with high cap shotguns.
My Basset Hound is.goofy looking and short although his head and teeth are almost as big as a German Shepherd. He flies under the coffee table. He is a stealth assault dog. His balls almost drag the floor and his Weiner is almost half his body length.
History ! means you got to now where you came from to know where your going !!!!! Too bad history has been lost in our schools systems and way too many CZcams videos.....
I put a riot shotgun in my safe next to an assault rifle, and NOTHING HAPPENED. Neither one started any riots or assaulted one another. Someone wisely observed that a riot requires more than two participants so, I put 4 more riot shotguns into the safe and since one person can assault something I left the single AR15 in there with the riot shotguns, and added a Mini14, thinking maybe they assault each other, and riot shotguns will riot. NOTHING HAPPENED! Someone said, people can incite others to riot, and 96% of all firearms murders were committed with pistols, not long guns. So with the propensity for a pistol to commit crimes, I put several pistols into the safe, and some hunting rifles, with the riot shotguns, and the assault rifles, so after the riot ensued, those hunting rifles could hunt down the responsible riot shotguns, pistols and assault rifles. I AM STILL WAITING, AND NOTHING IS HAPPENING! Hmm?
@@Marc1onius Congrats on banning guns. It always feels good to impose your opinion via the armed presence of your police force. I f I may ask though, why aren't you banning alcohol in Germany? That product kills and maims way more people than firearms ever has or will in times of peace in democratic countries. The number of fetal alcohol children born every alone year eclipses those injured through firearms, even if Germany was to allow firearms. So, I wouldn't be too quick to jump up on your soapbox until you're ready to stow away the hypocrisy and apply the logic used to ban firearms to alcohol. That, however, would require you to give up something that you don't need, that kills and maims others, but that you like to use. That's not likely to happen, is it?
@@Marc1onius Norbert, I seem to have hit a nerve ,and you’ve assumed I’m against gun control. In fact, I haven’t stated my stance on being pro-gun or anti-gun, so I’m not sure which echo chamber you think I reside in. I’m also unsure how you jumped from my statement on alcohol to side walks, but I think you may have been not have been thinking clearly. What I am saying is that alcohol does kill and maim children. This is done through the premeditated act of consuming a product that you know will impair your judgment. If I’m distilling what you are saying, it is guns are designed to kill, and must be banned, but other dangerous items only kill and maim through accidents, so they are OK. Am I getting that right? Then why, may I ask, have we banned things like lawn darts? They aren’t designed to kill and maim, but are banned because they accidently did so. And so what if booze isn’t designed to kill. That is irrelevant. Booze kills 2 peoples a day in Canada in drinking and driving accidents, produces 3000+ fetal alcohol babies every year, and is responsible for 23% of all violent crime. Your telling me this is OK because “it wasn’t designed to hurt any one”. I stand by my original assumption: you are a hypocrite who, through advocating for booze, cars that do excessive amounts of speed, etc. are condoning the death and injury of children.
@@Marc1onius Why are you lying? @ickster23 You really shouldn't listen to him, he obviously has no clue. Germany did not ban guns. We have 5,500,000 guns that are legally owned by 1,500,000 private citicens here in germany. I myself am a legal gun owner from germany. You have to jump through quite a bunch of hoops (take a mandatory gun-safety-class, buy a certified gun-safe, prove that you aren't a fellon, pay a bunch of fees, ...), but you can own as many guns as you want in germany. A friend of mine is a gun-collector and he owns over 800 guns. Germany has a HUGE gun sports and hunting culture. Every town has it's own "Schützenverein" - which translates to "shooting club". We can own all sorts of guns, like AR15, revolvers and semi-auto handguns, hunting rifles, pump-action shotguns, leveraction-rifles, even sbr's in some cases. Last weekend I shot a semi-auto AK47-clone and a semi-auto 9mm carbine with a 10" barrel at a very nice competition. 150 people competed. What we CAN'T do, is carrying the guns outside of our own property, outside the woods or outside of shooting ranges. Only government agencies, like the police, border patrol or customs and private security companies are allowed to carry guns on the streets. If you are a private citicen and you carry a gun outside your private property or a shooting range (or the woods if you are a hunter) you will pay A LOT of money. I'm talking of 11,000$ US and more. You will lose your right to posses firearms and if you were catched more than once, you will go to jail for up to 5 years. So nobody carries here. You also can't posses fireams in order to protect yourself. They are only allowed for hunting and sports - but if someone broke into your house and you are a gun owner, you are legally allowed to protect yourself with your guns. It's called "Notwehr" in germany (and "Recht muss Unrecht nicht weichen"), which is in a sense similar to your "castle-laws" and your "stand your ground laws". In addition the 5.5 million legally owned guns, there are over 20,000,000 illegal weapons in private possesion in germany. They are for the most part leftovers from WW2 and the DDR, and a lot of .22LR rifles, which were legal to purchase for everyone prior to 1974 (and basically nobody gave them away when the government made them illegal to have). Allmost every farmer in germany has at least one illegal gun here - but they are almost never used. FUN FACT: If you own an illegal firearm in germany and someone breakes into your house - you are legally allowed to protect yourself with this gun. The police will take the gun from you and you will face charges for illegal possesion of a firearm, but NOT FOR USING IT TO PROTECT YOURSELF. As we know now, germany has lot's of guns. More than one gun for every fourth citicen. But we don't shoot each other. The police has to shoot at only 7 to 10 people A YEAR - in whole germay. So, the number of guns can't be the reason for the number of shootings. In my opinion it's more likely that the us social security system (or the lack of such) is a big part of the problem. In germany nobody is "really poor". Our system catches you if you fall and gives you at least a roof over your head and money for clothing and food if you lose your job and can't pay your bills. Also, our medical care system is better and nobody has to sell their house in order to pay the hospital bills (95% of all germans never saw a hospital bill in their whole live, literally EVERYTHING is covered by our health-insurance). Another big problem of the US are the drugs and the gangs - which kinda correlate, right? ;) In germany, we don't have a very poor neighbour - but the US has mexico, and they are smuggeling a lot of illegal weapons and drugs into the country. Gun bans are proven useless (look at the UK) and they won't fix the problem. If a murderer doesn't have a gun, he takes a knife. I mean, seriously, in the stone age, they busted each others heads with stones.. That's why it's called the stone age. People will always find ways to kill each other if they want to.
Liberals say we should NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged by liberals to judge ALL gun owners based on the actions of a few madmen.
So the answer is simple, don't allow madmen to have guns.Just about every other nation has positive vetting, so that you have to show that you are fit to own a gun. This is just common sense,you could even allow more types of guns.
@@alecb8509 This is not the experience of every other civilised nation with an organised government. Are you actually in favour of allowing nutters to have guns?
@@Dave-sw2dm you know what I meant. The US allows people to have assault rifles who they are not prepared to trust to board a plane. The lady has provided an excellent definition of an assult rifle.
Matteo Kropej the video does say the difference. She says the m16 has selective fire where as the ar15 is only semi-automatic therefor difference in fire rate resulting in different firearms
You nailed it perfectly. I deeply appreciate your summation: that the use of assault weapon verbal is PURE propaganda. Got a sub. Love your delivery. Truly fine work.
BASIC DICTATORSHIP 101 REV. - James A Wyatt, Jr. 1)THE major first step is the Gaining control by whatever means available of ALL means of communication, i.e. the news media and every other means of private and public communication; 2) That while also taking promptly total control in/of all areas of banking, finance, commerce, etc.; (See #5, below, please) 3) While also seeking to totally DIVIDE AND CONQUER this a very basic Rule for success in establishing control in an adversarial endeavor be it in War on the BATTLEFIELD or in the ‘POLITICAL WARFARE TRENCHES’ in the TARGETING OF THE NATION’S ENTIRE/TOTAL POPULATION . . . and anyone that is ‘awake’ is seeing that accomplished daily; this ‘tool’ being applied exponentially by government in general and now in particular in our United States of America today: citizen against citizen, neighbor against neighbor, that by courts and the government at both the national, state, county, city and town level; this tool so candidly stated by an appointee of the Alien Occupier: “Crisis offers Opportunity” and thus the fermenting of civil commotion in every available area is being utilized as simply yet another of the satanic tools being put in play**. 4) But most certainly of greatest importance is implementing by every means available the Totally disarming of the general population as Hitler’s National Socialist did especially targeting the Jews; Marks & Stalin’s Communist and as sought by the UN and those of the National Socialist/Communist/liberals; especially those currently in power in our nation’s government; their sole purpose is to facilitate the allowing only the ‘government’ to be armed thus establishing total dependence on the government by those of the population who are ‘law abiding’ out of fear or for whatever reason, while seeking to convey what is actually a totally false sense of safety and well-being. 5. And always find someone else to blame for any and all problems, etc, and THEN take every means necessary to vilify and then purge/slaughter THEM ONE AND ALL. AND, WE MUST NOT FORGET . . . 6, Total destruction of the target nation’s economy is MANDATORY hence . . . DESTRUCTION FINANCE 101 THE DIVERSION - Remember the old shell game where the huckster had three walnut shells and one pea and you were enticed to concentrate on his hand movements of the walnut shells so that you could point out the location of the pea; this while his pickpocket cohorts were working the spectators? Well friends you have been had yet again Note: This course of action/instruction approved by Hussein, Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Hun Sen, Kim Jong-II, Chairman Mao, Chavez, Castro, Mussolini, as well as all others of similar ilk including the Illegal Alien Occupant of our White House! - James A Wyatt Jr - Son of The Gunsmith, J.A.’Red"Wyatt 1902-1964, WYATT CUSTOM RIFLES James A Wyatt Jr - Son of The Gunsmith, J.A.'Red"Wyatt 1902-1964, WYATT CUSTOM RIFLES Kosciusko, MS H.S. Class of 1956; Mississippi State Univ. Class of 1961 All Hours On Site Target Risk Investigations - 8 States - 1962-1997 IN JEHOVAH GOD WE TRUST; all else is highly suspect. TRUTH AND REALITY IN PRESENT DAY AMERICA; OUR ONCE GREAT NATION THAT WE, ON OUR WATCH, ALLOWED TO BE TAKEN OVER BY ROGUE CAREER POLITICIANS, THESE INCLUDING PERVERTED DEMONCRATS, MUSLIMS, COMMUNIST, GANGS OF THUGS, CHICAGO SPAWNED GANGSTERS, ROGUE POLITICIANS, PAGAN LAWYERS, HEATHENS; ONE AND ALL SATAN’S TOTALLY DEDICATED DISCIPLES. REGARDING THE POTENTIAL FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR ONCE GREAT NATION BECOMING LIKE THAT OF GERMANY IN IT’S RISE OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM UNDER HITLER'S NAZI OR THAT OF RUSSIA AND OTHERS THAT BECAME COMMUNIST OR THAT OF OTHER NATIONAL WHERE 'GOVERNMENT WENT WILD' WITH THE RESULT THAT POTENTIAL FOR FOR CIVIL UNREST BECOMES THE CATALYST FOR CIVIL UNREST LEADING TO CIVIL WAR, AND CONDITIONS IN OUR NATION CURRENTLY GIVES STRONG INDICATION OF THAT BECOMING REALITY; ONE IS THEN FORCED TO "TAKE INVENTORY" OF ONE'S CURRENT 'SITUATION" IN THE COURSE OF WHICH THE CONCLUSION IS THAT ONE IS APPARENTLY MUCH 'BETTER OFF" THAN THE MAJORITY OF MY FELLOW CITIZENS. BEING A SOUTHERNER, 81 YEARS OF AGE IF I MAKE IT TO NOVEMBER,27th; I WAS TAUGHT BY DAD A GUNSMITH AND BUILDER OF CUSTOM SPORTING HUNTING RIFLES, TO SHOOT BEGINNING AT AGE 5 YEARS OF AGE WITH A DAISY BB GUN FOLLOWED BY A .22 RIFLE, A .410 SHOTGUN AND A .22 HANDGUN WHICH WAS FOLLOWED AT AGE 14 BY A M1911 .45 THAT I POSSESSED WHICH HAD GONE THROUGH WWII, AND THUS WITH ABOUT 70 YEARS OF FIREARM USAGE AND QUITE PROBABLY WITH QUITE A FEW IN MY AGE GROUP WITH SIMILAR EXPERIENCE, WE OLD FOLKS SHOULD CONSTITUTE A BIT OF SUPPORT FOR OTHER OF YOU WHO ARE ARE PATRIOTIC SOUTHERN COUNTRY GUN SAVVY HUNTER EXPERIENCED FOLKS. OUR FURTHER AND BY FAR & WITHOUT A DOUBT MAJOR ASSET BEING ALSO THAT WE ARE MOSTLY EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS AND THUS BELONG "LOCK, STOCK, AND BARREL' TO OUR LORD AND SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST AND THUS HAVE NO FEAR OF SUFFERING DEATH IN THIS LIFE IN WHICH WE NOW ARE EXPERIENCING POOR HEALTH AND THUS WITH THE ATTENDANT SUFFERING. THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT MY AND PROBABLY MANY OF YOURS ANCESTORS FOUGHT IN THE FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR, THE AMERICAN REVOLUTIONARY WAR, AND THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR AND HAVING TO FOLLOW IN THEIR FOOTSTEPS IS JUST A PART OF THE NOBLE CALLING THAT A FREE PEOPLE MUST WILLINGLY EMBRACE AS ONE OF THE MANY RESPONSIBILITIES OF BEING FREE AND IN ORDER TO EXECUTE THAT RESPONSIBILITY OUR FOREFATHERS PROVIDED OUR BILL OF RIGHTS IN GENERAL AND THE 2nd AMENDMENT IN PARTICULAR!!!!! REGARDING THE POTENTIAL FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR ONCE GREAT NATION BECOMING LIKE THAT OF GERMANY IN IT’S RISE OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM UNDER HITLER'S NAZI OR THAT OF RUSSIA AND OTHERS THAT BECAME COMMUNIST OR THAT OF OTHER NATIONAL WHERE 'GOVERNMENT WENT WILD' WITH THE RESULT THAT POTENTIAL FOR FOR CIVIL UNREST BECOMES THE CATALYST FOR CIVIL UNREST LEADING TO CIVIL WAR; AND CONDITIONS IN OUR NATION CURRENTLY GIVES STRONG INDICATION OF THAT BECOMING REALITY; AND THE MINDSET VOCALLY DISPLAYED BY SO MANY OF THE PRESENT DAY YOUTH LENDS FURTHER EVIDENCE OF THAT POTENTIAL, THEY LIKE THEIR PARENTS OF THE ‘FLOWER CHILD’ GENERATION STEEPED IN SOCIALISM. OUR FURTHER AND WITHOUT A DOUBT MAJOR ASSET BEING ALSO THAT WE ARE MOSTLY EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS, BELONGING "LOCK, STOCK, AND BARREL' TO OUR LORD AND SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST AND THUS HAVE NO FEAR OF SUFFERING DEATH IN THIS LIFE IN WHICH WE NOW ARE EXPERIENCING POOR HEALTH AND THUS WITH THE ATTENDANT SUFFERING. THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT MY AND PROBABLY MANY OF YOURS FOUGHT IN THE FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR, THE AMERICAN REVOLUTIONARY WAR, AND THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR AND HAVING TO FOLLOW IN THEIR FOOTSTEPS IS JUST A PART OF THE NOBEL CALLING THAT A FREE PEOPLE MUST WILLINGLY EMBRACE AS ONE OF THE MANY RESPONSIBILITIES THAT COMES WITH THE BLESSING OF BEING FREE AND IN ORDER TO EXECUTE THAT RESPONSIBILITY OUR FOREFATHERS SO WISELY PROVIDED OUR BILL OF RIGHTS IN GENERAL AND THE 2nd AMENDMENT IN PARTICULAR, THAT PROVIDED JUST IN CASE WE CAME TO THE POINT OF NEEDING TO BE ARMED AND THUS ABLE TO EFFECTIVELY AND SUCCESSFULLY CRUSH A TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT!!!!!!!
The term is real...the "assault" rifle was designed to be able to literally move forward while shouldering and firing aimed sustained fire. Storm the enemy...Sturmgewehr..Storm Rifle...but civilians own semi automatic version of this.
What most of these numbnut idiots in the press and on the Left don't realize is that in 9 cases out of 10, a semi-automatic weapon is better than a fully automatic one.
@@testacles4807 In the Lost World (2nd Park Movie) Roland carries a .600 Nitro Express Double Barrel Elephant Gun that he was going to use to shoot a Male T-Rex. In Jurassic World (4th Franchise Movie), Owen Grady carries a .45-70 Marlin Model 1895SBL, but it was just the gun he was carrying around.
stop using logic. They can shoot as fast as a fighter jet, with heat seaking, race and religion detection systems, Assault Rifles. C'mon man you should know that from our trusted Politicians and News Media.
History ! means you got to now where you came from to know where your going !!!!! Too bad history has been lost in our schools systems and way too many CZcams videos.....
@Undarl Just give her the proper tech and you're golden. She's in a home studio, if given the prompters like pros use, she's speaking to the crowd, for the video, it's almost indistinguishable as you put the camera on top of the prompter.
Impressive. As a former marine ordnance officer professionally familiar with the subject, she gets everything - every technical and historical detail - correct.
You would ask yourself how politicians and pundits could hear these truths a hundred times and still not get it. I would submit that they do; they can't all be that densely stupid. But none of them would ever admit to or spread the truth because it would destroy the arguements for the anti-gun agenda they are pushing.
Been waiting for someone like you Philip Carrell a man with all the answers to come up with a sufficient way to keep these so called assualt weapons out of the hands of lunatics. The night club killing in Florida, the movie theater killing in Colorado, the Sandyhook shooting all have one thing in common. They all involved the not so dangerous AR-15. According to the lady they are not dangerous because they don't fire fully automatic. They still kill a large number of people so it is still a dangerous weapon.
I laugh every time I hear Patricia Eddinton use the prase "Heat seeking projectiles" when describing a Tracer Round... AR-15 is an Armalite Rifle, not Assault Rifle... An it is a Semi-Automatic, for civilians.
I also laugh when she says they are capable of shooting down airplanes. Yeah, IF the planes are low enough and slow enough. You might hit a Cessna landing or taking off but a commercial jet at 30,000 feet won't even notice and if you try to shoot at a fighter jet going 600 mph your lucky if you can pull the trigger in time. And even if the fighter pilot does notice all your going to do is just piss him off enough to turn around and give you a really bad attitude because he will have to explain to his ground crew why he has a bullet hole in their baby IF your lucky enough to hit it!!!
One think I love about Liberty Doll is that she does her homework,refuses to tell a lie and I've NEVER seen her tell anything that wasn't fully TRUE without noting anything she saw as questionable. When Liberty Doll says it,I KNOW it's true. I especially like that she lays it out without breaking into "Legalese". HUGS to ya,Girl!
Is she part Asian or Scottish? Scottish girls can look pretty Asian like that so I don't know e.g. Catherine Zeta-Jones is Scottish. P.S. 6:45 Gee I wonder what ethnicity Josh Sugarman is. How'd it work out for the Jews when they turned their guns in to Hitler?!? Who's stuck on stupid much???
The term "Assault Rifle" actually does have a definition and you mentioned 2 of them. 1. Intermediate range cartridge. 2. Select fire. 3. Magazine fed.
Actually, the US Army published the Special Forces Foreign Weapons Handbook FSTC-CS-07-35-66, which defined ASSAULT RIFLES in 1967 in Section III, paragraph 68.a.
I have never owned a single fire arm in my life. The more these politicians with 24 hour security tell me I shouldnt own one, the more I feel inclined to go and become an owner.
Joseph Congdon yeah I know it was the 1986 ban on full auto that I was referencing to as the inch we gave them. I feel that the 1986 ban needs to be repealed. The second amendment is not meant to be limited and it shouldn’t be.
Yup, civilians should have all the same weapons the military uses. If just one is missing from the civilian population the 2nd amendment is not being followed.
I am very grateful that you did. I often fume silently when the antis lie about things and other folks just accept it as fact. I put a link on my channel so everyone of my views has an opportunity to see this.
You know what's really telling? There isn't anybody who is actually experienced or knowledgeable on the topic of firearms talking about banning anything or making new laws. It's only people who don't know jack shit about guns. It's like, if somebody wanted me to start making laws about cars but I don't have a license, never owned a car and never learned how to drive. So, I don't know jack shit about cars. Who in their right mind would put me in charge of making laws that would affect millions of Americans?
I find that in trying to bring up a similar point I am given the retort that "then men shouldn't be able to talk about illegalizing 'muh birf contro' (birth control for non Freedom Toons fans) and 'muh abortion' because they don't know what its like to be a woman". For anyone else out there who has experienced this and may read my comment here, this is for you. Don't be confused by their attempt to bring in an unrelated argument. There are a few key differences, the most clear-cut one being that anti-gunners rarely seem to take an interest in educating themselves on the topic and instead like to regurgitate slogans, buzzwords, fallacies, and half-truths that they are spoon fed in their political echo-chamber. In contrast, I would say that most men understand, at least at an intellectual level, the struggle of birthing and raising a child even if they have not experienced it themselves. Slightly muddier, there is also a difference in morality to the argument. There is nothing inherently moral or immoral about owning a firearm any more so than there is in owning a knife, car, pencil, jazz CD, or any other inanimate object. There is a valid, if debatable, argument for the morality of birth control and more specifically abortion not only in legality, but also in the public funding of the aforementioned. It doesn't necessarily take first hand knowledge or even much knowledge of a subject to debate it's morality. I don't need to have a high degree of knowledge about how to kill a man in cold blood to know its immoral to murder. I don't need to have ever robbed a jewelry store to know that theft is immoral. I don't need to have ever had a romantic relationship to know that cheating on one's partner is immoral. I don't need to have ever given birth to argue that killing a fetus before it even has a chance at life is immoral. To some that all may have seemed like nuance, but nuance is important. That's the end of my slightly off topic little rant. Hope it helps someone make a strong coherent argument.
Aidan Druck - Try as I might, I couldn't follow along. You need to break that LOOOOONG runonsentenceparagraphinto separate paragraphs with punctuation. Just a suggestion.
Well I'll take your suggestion on breaking my arguments up into more easily digestible paragraphs in the future. However, I think my punctuation is adequate though it might contain some errors. Particularly with the commas. I sometimes worry about over-punctuating and improper comma placement. As for run-on sentences, I can see one, maybe two that are borderline run-on. Since you were kind enough to leave me some constructive criticism and you had trouble following my argument, I'll attempt to increase my clarity. Here goes. In attempting to make the same or a similar point to the original comment, I have come across a counter argument that is poorly made. It is to the effect of "you say I shouldn't argue for anti-gun policy because I am not knowledgeable enough. Then men shouldn't argue for anti-birth control/abortion policy because they don't give birth". The most clear difference between these two things is in the effort of either side to educate themselves and make good arguments. Anti-gunners frequently substitute actual knowledge and logic with slogans, buzzwords, fallacies, and half-truths. On the other hand, I believe most men understand at some level the hardships of giving birth to and raising a child. They may not have actually experienced childbirth, but they can appreciate just how much of a burden it can be. They understand how raising a child, especially when unprepared, can derail someone's life plans. The second and less clear-cut difference is in the argument of morality. There is nothing any more inherently immoral about owning a firearm than there is in owning any inanimate object. In contrast, there is a valid, yet debatable argument to be made for the morality of abortion and birth control. Well, two arguments really. One for the morality of actually terminating a pregnancy and the other for the morality of making taxpayers fund it. My point here is that it does not take the same level of knowledge of a subject to debate its morality. Its not like analyzing statistics, debating the long term results of an action, or even debating the function of something. A person doesn't need to know how to kill to know that murder is wrong. A person doesn't have to have been in a relationship to know that cheating on their partner is wrong. And a person doesn't have to have given birth to argue that killing an unborn fetus is immoral. I hope that was a little more clear for you to understand. I don't think I could have broken that up anymore without using sentence fragments or breaking my points up too much. I don't want to make my argument disjointed, you know?
I got the same message from both of your posts, well written, thank you. Maybe Uberragen is a little slow. But I think he's just the proverbial 'turd in the punch bowl'.
Banning weapons WILL NOT REDUCE CRIME... CRIMINALS DON’T CARE ABOUT LAWS!!! if more people are equipped to defend themselves, crime will reduce. Any crime that still happens will be stopped almost immediately by people that are armed and ready to defend themselves and others
@@adversaryamerican6822 according to the CDC guns have been used defensively to save roughly between 500,000 to 3 million people per year. And many times just by brandishing the weapon and not firing them.
Adversary American Prohibited from issuing reports on gun violence is true. However the study referenced isn’t about gun violence it’s about defensive use of firearms among private citizens which doesn’t classify as violence. Don’t believe me? You can look on the CDC website for the study.
@@adversaryamerican6822 There's a town, Kennesaw, Georgia, that has a law that mandates, that every household must have at least one firearm for protection. The Kennesaw, law was activated the same day that Morton Grove, Illinois, banned all weapons within the city limits. Violent Crime in Kennesaw, Georgia is almost zero, where violent crime in Morton Grove has flourished since the ban of firearms. Living proof that most criminals will not attempt a home break in, of a home, that has a gun that will KILL them. BTW, I live just outside the Kennesaw city limits, so I've seen how effective this law is. Please note that Kennesaw, does not arrest those homeowners that violate the law by not owning a gun. The law just lets criminals know that more than likely a gun is behind every front door of a house they may think about breaking into. This law works extremely well.
@@ericsimpson1176 Eric; when you see vids of LAW MAKERS trying to lift a rifle up to their shoulder (sometimes backwards) you realize that is a safe bet.
I own 6 different ar style rifles none of them were made by Armalite or any other gun manufacturer for that matter but I'm pretty sure they are all considered ghost assault rifles even though three of them are pistols
Great Video! Another ignorant statement that I’ve heard on soooo many occasions is that “well the AR-15’s own name states that it’s an assault rifle” when asked what the HELL they are talking about, many don’t know how to answer that because all they are doing is repeating something that they themselves have heard somewhere and instead of taking 5 mins to learn something for themselves and verify what they’ve been told, they just accept it. Others would actually try to have a meaningful debate when asked what the hell they were talking about and would say “of course AR-15’s are assault rifles, what do you think the “AR” stands for?” Smh. Every single person that Ive encountered with this understanding of assault rifles was flabbergasted when I explained that a 5 min research on the matter would have set the record straight a long time ago and explained to them that the inventor of the AR-15 Eugene Stoner worked for Armalite Arms Co and therefore his rifle was named after his company the “A”(Armalite) “R”(Rifle). Why is it that no one seems to understand nor practice the old saying that when we are “told” something that we should trust BUT VERIFY what it is that we are being told? Such ignorance and laziness to just sit back and believe everything that we are TOLD!! Keep spreading the truth Doll, you ARE part of the solution!
I used to have an assault rifle. It insisted on shooting people. Why, it aimed itself at people even as I pled with it to stop. It never listened to me, just aimed itself and shot people. One time it aimed itself at ME and told me to shut up before it shop me! Once it had emptied its chamber, I could jump on it and got it melted down into a large bar. Then, since it couldn't shoot people, it wanted to start bludgeoning people. Now it's in my back yard chained up on both ends so it can't hurt anyone anymore.
Great video. I would only add that weight was a big factor in developing the M16. The lighter weight of the gun and its ammo meant that soldiers could carry more ammo with them
I can’t take any politician seriously who doesn’t care enough about a topic to at least educate themselves on the terminology. Why be willfully ignorant?
An assault weapon is any weapon that the government does not want civilians to own. In other words, "all firearms". Hopefully that clears up any confusion.
No an assault rifle is a selective fire rifle with a caliber higher than that of a pistol but lower than a battle rifle. It's it's own category of arms but the AR 15 simply ain't fitting of that requirement.
John Wills, all that has been thrown out by proposed WA state initiative 1639. Any rifle that uses the gas from a fired round to cycle the action will become an assault rifle... including Ruger 10/22 (all 22lr. Rifles).
Timeless2, In what I've read on that it seemed to me that even a semi-auto gas operated shotgun would fall under that as well. If you have any insight/info to correct my thought one way or the other I would be grateful. Curious Ohioan here.
This was an amazing vlog. I do however wish she would have mentioned that, James Brady, the person whom the Brady Bill or the Brady Campaign was named after, was not shot by anything even close to an "assault rifle", but a pre-world war two german six shot revolver......
So what's your point? Isn't anything that contributes to reducing negligent gun ownership a good thing? The Brady bill dose NOT pretend in any way to address "assault rifles" so you conflating the two shows your dishonesty more than anything else really. Its a fact that Americans devotion to guns make it a real possibility that some fool, pissed off at his spouse or neighbour , will go get a gun a nd shoot him in the heat of the moment the same way he will go back to his car and get a baseball bat or go back to his garage and get a machete or whatever. so if you can get him to cool off for a day or two that's a good thing. Yeah, I am well aware that it wont prevent ALL people from going back after the five days , getting the gun and shooting your dumb husband for blowing leaves onto his lawn but if it saves a life then it a good thing.
point to any law that would have stopped any of the mass shootings. the youtube shooter passed a background check and waited the ten days before her little assault in gun-hating california. surely you must know that gun-related death (especially involving long arms of any type) account for a small number of deaths while the left by comparison ignore all the far more common causes of preventable deaths. it's much easier to suppress our civil rights.
come on now that's a scottsmans fallacy. We know from both anecdotal and philological evidence that MOST people will cool own from a bad temper and reconsider a bad course of action given time. That's why you grab you dumbass drunk friend at the bar when his beer muscles tell him that the huge bodybuilder who accidentally spilled is drink is an easy mark. I am severely disappointed in your response about California. I was hoping that some class would prevail and not have anyone gloat simply because of a failure in a system that's otherwise working and point to that as a failure of the system itself. That's like saying that the army was wrong to buy the Abrams tank because rebels destroyed one with an RPG. Yes I am intimately aware of the stats. I deal with them everyday. So let me tell you a stat that people don't like. States with the most gun control has the least gun related crimes. So the next statement is no way , look at Chicago. The problem with that is this. If your neighbour has a huge tree your yard will always be full of leaves even if you cut down you own tree. The real problem that these kids have are the gun nuts who refuse to admit that guns are a real problem. We can all say till we are blue in the face that people kill people not guns but there is no denying that its PEOPLE with GUNS who kill people. Yes , again I know, knives, cars , blah blah blah. We require that you be trained and licensed and insured in the case of cars (driving is a privilege , blah..) but the analogy is still valid. Gun nuts think that the kids who suffered trauma beyond comprehension are whiners " that they have no clue what they are even fighting for. These kids are just parroting what they've heard from fakestream media". When you have a kid who shakes at the thought of going to school, when you find your kid curled up UNDER her bed when she should be asleep, when your son shits himself when you tell him its time to go back to school then you can say they "hey have no clue what they are even fighting for. " Look I do not in the least advocate the banning of guns or even the repeal of the second amendment really. I don't think its really necessary or would even be particularly effective. And for all the morons out there talking about the "liberals" want a gun grab the stupidity of such a statement boggles the mind but people still believe it anyway. In my opinion no single action will fix the problem of people , usually young white conservative males, shooting masses of people in confined spaces as a way of solving even minor social and societal differences. (yes again, young black males kill each other at an alarming rate so why is no one talking about that){for the record its been spoken about loudly} Background checks, which the NRA opposes , is a great start. Philological evaluations should be a normal part of those background checks. Violent convictions across state lines is also should be a part of these checks. The issue is that these are confidential and doctors cannot report findings unless they feel there is an eminence of immediate violence. Requiring a simple waiting period will not stop gun violence or stop violence per se. What it will do is stop one or two people from killing a few people and that matters when the one or two people are your wife or mother or your kid.
The term "assault" in "assault rifle," refers to the MILITARY action, meaning to storm or attack rapidly. "Assault rifle" defines a group of firearms possessing very specific features. "Assault WEAPON" is the politically contrived term.
@Cherokeeman Lolz Nice appeal to authority fallacy. Military service does NOT automatically qualify you as an expert in any way. I am NOT talking out of my ass. Whether you have heard the term used in the military is irrelevant. The term "assault rifle" DOES exist in firearms nomenclature. It is NOT a political term, nor a liberal attempt to relabel something. You are quite clearly conflating "assault RIFLE" with "assault WEAPON," two entirely different terms. "Assault rifle" has existed as a term since the mid-40s, starting with the German Sturmgewehr 44, which means "assault rifle" in German. Even the M-16 is classified as an assault rifle - the U.S. government officially classifies it as "Rifle, M-16," but it IS an assault rifle, even if not officially labelled as such, as it meets all the requirements of an assault rifle. "Assault weapon" is the political term, referring to a semi-automatic firearm with any of a number of cosmetic features that allegedly make it more popular with criminals. I suggest you educate yourself on proper nomenclature, so as to avoid making an ass out of yourself in the future. And stop assuming your military service makes you an expert. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_rifle en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_weapon
@Cherokeeman Lolz I literally handed you the definitions of both an assault rifle and an assault weapon, and you are still trying to argue your point. I am going to guess that you did not read them. The term "assault rifle" does NOT need to exist in military parlance for the term to be recognized in firearms nomenclature. Just because the M-16 is listed in Army inventories as "Rifle, M-16," and not "Assault Rifle, M-16," likewise does not discount its use in firearms nomenclature. It has been a documented APOLITICAL term since 1945. It is NOT misused except in political circles, and then only by people who do not know what the term actually means. If it were not a recognized term in firearms nomenclature, Congress would not have used it, quite specifically, in the Hughes Amendment to FICO. Once again, you have demonstrated your commplete ignorance in the face of evidence and reasoned argument. The only one getting his ass handed to him is you, by a civilian who has spent literally his entire life surrounded by guns.
@Cherokeeman Lolz The only thing you handed me was a victory, while only further proving your own ignorance. Reason first, I provided a link that proved my assertion regarding assault rifles. You have offered no supporting evidence for your rebuttal other than personal experience, which is only anecdotal and is not considered academically credible. Reason the second, you insist that "assault rifle" is a political term, but have not provided evidence to support that claim. Meanwhile, I have also provided a link to the definition of "assault weapon," which also supports my claim to its political origin. Reason the third, a firearm's classification is not dependent on any military's official adoption of the term, but rather based entirely on whether or not it fits a list of specific, objective criteria. You seem to have a hard time grasping the idea that the military does not always define how things are classified. Whether you care to admit it or not, you are wrong. As you keep making verifiably false assertions, I can only surmise you did not look into the links I provided. Regardless, the fact remains that "assault rifle" is a purebred stallion, while "assault weapon" is the mythical unicorn.
I highly suggest you quit while you are far behind. You possess neither the knowledge base, evidende, nor faculties to engage me effectively on this matter.
The term Sturmgewehr describes the type of troops who would use it - assault troops (in WWI they were called "Stosstruppen" - shock troops) This is easily confirmed by the existence of the FG-42, or "Fallschirmjaegergewehr 42". Fallschirmjaeger is the German term for paratroopers. Gewehr is German for "rifle". By the way, the AR in AR-15 stands for "ARmalite", not Armalite Rifle or Assault Rifle.
Paused in the middle to suggest that a definition of "full auto" would have been helpful to those viewers who are ignorant about firearms. Overall good work.
@Ben Smith But married! Unfortunately, there might just be several women like her in this country, but alas, 99% of them are married while the other 1% is scattered all over the US!!! Making them as rare as hens teeth!!
Well technically most guns are made to Kill, not in a massacre way but to kill animals for food or to kill in self defense or to kill in war but technically still a killing instrument
@ he's saying that guns were designed to kill, actually all weapons were, knives, swords, spears, ax's, bow and arrows, however how a person uses them is the difference,
@@paladan00 yes at least someone understands but ammo- sexuals like ihc terra have a knee jerk reaction to what I said about a normal gun's purpose which is to kill (in self defense and hunting) but gun nuts are so scared of their guns being demonized they won't admit the purpose of some guns but when people say some guns are made for killing they don't mean it's for massacres because only a libtard would think that but it's made to penetrate
No, they're never assault rifles. That is a made up term. If that is the case then baseball bats, forks, spoons, a frying pan, etc. are all assault weapons.
Actually, machine guns weren’t “banned” in 1986, they were regulated in 1934 along with “destructive devices”, where they needed to be registered with the Dept. of the Treasury and a $200 fee for machine guns and $5 for destructive devices (ie grenades). In 1968 MGs and DDs, as well as Carbine Rifles and Sawn Off Shotguns (barrels under 18 inches and overall length under 26 inches), silencers, and gas masks were banned under the Gun Control Act which also banned purchasing a gun outside of your own state of residence. In 1986 all of those items were re-legalized under Ronald Reagan with the Firearm Owner Protection Act allowing citizens to own those items again, provided their resident state doesn’t prohibit possession of them, they are not prohibited from possessing any firearms, they must register them with the Dept. of the Treasury and pay the fees. Anyone selling or making those items must have an FFL and an M3 license, provided their resident State doesn’t prohibit it.
Wrong... go read the FOPA. It clearly BANS civilian ownership of any machine gun MANUFACTURED after 1986. MANUFACTURED AFTER 1986...you tried to be slick and knowledgeable and instead you look terribly ignorant.
Exactly, the .223 is very popular with varmint hunters and ranchers. The lightweight design of the AR makes it easier to tote around for long periods, than its bolt action counterpart and the gas operation reduces recoil significantly. It's great for protecting livestock from wolves, dingos, etc. I wouldn't trust it with an angry bear though, or a large elk. I think for large game like that I would feel more comfortable with a 30-30 lever action, or a 30-06, semi like the Remington 7400.
Ahhh the most education, accurate...and attractive news channel on the internet! Also, never mind the fact that the main function of fully automatic fire in a military application is for suppressive fire. Other than that, usually semi-auto or two to three shot burst is used. Being able to dump a 30 round mag with one trigger pull won't help much if you can't hit the broad side of a barn and most untrained civilians wouldn't be able to with a full auto function!
Nailed 100%. Fighting the gun myths is difficult yet necessary if our rights are to be protected. Assault rifles must have select fire capability to be classified as assault rifles.
@@healthquest4823 Actually murderers use whatever is easiest to conceal, which is pistols. If not that, knives are more often used. If you ban them, then the only people that won't have them are people like you and me, those who obey the law.
@@DARIVSARCHITECTVS I was talking about mass murderers...like in Las Vegas and so many other places. As far as normal one on one murders are concerned, statistics show that if a person owns a gun for self defense, there is a 43 times greater chance he will use it to commit suicide or murder someone himself than shoot an assailant. There is also the problem of children finding it and killing themselves or someone else. My own father kept a 25 caliber pistol under his mattress. A girlfriend of my sister found it and pointed it at my sister. She started screaming her head head off, and my mom ran into the room before the girl pulled the trigger and snatched it from her. It might have been on safety though and possibly didn't have a round chambered, but I'll never know. I'm not really an anti gun freak. I've owned several including a Daewoo assault rifle. But, if more lives would be saved without them than with, who I'm I to argue they all shouldn't be banned? Most countries do you know.
That was great. I love laughing at the politicians who attempt to define "Assault Rifle". They never fail at tripping over themselves & sounding foolish beyond description. Hell lately I've heard some having trouble explaining "High Capacity Magazine" let alone the entire gun. HOWEVER- messing with our 2A is not a laughing matter at all. Keep up the good work.
A projectile is a missile that has been launched from a fire arm, so: A missile is "an object which is forcibly propelled at a target, either by hand or from a mechanical weapon. " Therefore, if any of us has the capacity to pick up a stone and propel it at an animate or inanimate target, we are an assault weapons! We should surrender our selves to the government and let them feed, clothe and house us.
2nd video I have watched. I just subscribed. You are courageous and I want to thank you for trying to be a voice of reality in this ever-increasingly confused world.
Former Green Beret special forces soldiers here...Forget most everything you heard in this video... There is only One thing that (Turns) a rifle into an Assault Rifle... The rifle Must have an Apparatus near the end of the barrel so that a Bayonet can be mounted... 1. You either are shooting combatants with your rifle... or 2. You mount the bayonet in order to charge at the enemy to assault and impale them....sometimes doing both. The Rifle only Becomes an Assault Rifle when you are Charging them to impale them with the Bayonet... The First Assault rifles were used before and during Revolutionary War when they mounted their Bayonets onto their Musket long guns.... What makes a true (Assault Riffle)has Nothing to do with :: 1. The color 2. The shape or appearance...long or short 3. Semi or full auto 4. Magazine or not 5. How many rounds it will hold Assault Rifles have been used in every war or conflict... During WW1,Soldiers used their rifles to assault the enemy with their Bayonets on a daily basis.The Marines did as well in the Pacific islands during WW11. Before there was gunpowder,soldiers were assaulting one another with Spears....think about that... One last thing....The AK-47 was originally designed for mainly one purpose,it was a weapon to be used in close quarters combat in urban warfare (town and villages). The long range guns were big,long and heavy to shoot in street fighting around corners,tight places in side of buildings and rooms and ally ways...that's it...
"Rifle" and "musket" are different guns. A bayonet on a musket does NOT make it an assault rifle as it's not a rifled gun... My favourite "pedantry" is that there are no submachine guns in the world except Thompsons...
Not at all true. An assault rifle is a magazine fed rifle, firing an intermediate cartridge, with selective fire capability. The US army doesn't even issue bayonets anymore.
@@No1sonuk Not in the US army. My son and son in law are both soldiers right now, and they were surprised that no bayonets were issued anymore. Maybe in the marines, I'm not sure, but not in the army.
"Assault rifle" is not a term used to create propaganda. "Assault Weapon" is a term used to create propaganda. "Assault Rifle" is a term for which the U.S. Army has a definition, unlike "Assault Weapon" for which the U.S. Army does not have a definition.
And have you noticed that in the hands of citizens, an AR15 is an "Assault Rifle" But when in the hands of Law Enforcement an AR15 is a "Patrol Rifle" or "Tactical Rifle"
Tactical rifle does make more sense and provokes no insult to my mind. I've known for decades that the AR- 15 was a repeater gun, not an automatic one. The biggest thing looming in our populace, to me anyway, is the "sex appeal" kind of thing where in the dark minds of some who would carry out demonic acts on other citizens, venture to the AR's and the likes because they were designed for the express purpose of killing people. That's the attraction, no matter what labels they put on those guns, they are in the family of military grade and ill informed politicians are muddying the case to discuss this further with poor understandings.
@@whalesong999 Actually, you should be insulted... that's the whole point of my post: the fact that their propaganda campaigns are insinuating that the exact same rifle in a citizens hands is an evil "assault rifle" who's only purpose is to kill... but in the hands of police, suddenly that exact same AR15 is a righteous "tactical rifle". Bullshit. And a semi-auto-only AR is anything but "military grade"... that was the whole point of Colt releasing the original SP-1 AR15 back in the 1960's.- Was that it was a civilian grade weapon capable of semi-auto-only fire, and only "looked" like it's true "military grade" full-auto capable counterpart... the M-16. Any soldier or mercenary would laugh at you if you suggested they take a semi-auto-only rifle into a combat arena.
canada equips its soldiers with semi-auto rifles (ar-15 coincidentally). the reasoning is that it saves ammo and makes them aim more carefully before pulling the trigger. kind of works for them. :) however, full auto is not for hitting anyone, since that almost never happens anyways. full auto is for making a lot of noise in order to scare the opponent and drive them to duck, which at the same time prevents them from aiming at you : this improves your chances for survival. this happens in particular when you storm an enemy base (hence the name 'sturmgewehr'), and when you have to immediately react to a sudden attack on you, which is why security personnel carries submachine guns. same goes for any civilian who has to live in or make it through inner-city drive-by shooting infested areas. which is why there is absolutely no justification to banning civilian ownership of machine guns - self-defense is legal. the 2A is about preventing any minority from ruling overbthe majority, be it the street corner gangster ruling over his victims, or a government refusing to obey its people. this obviously requires keeping and bearing the most capable arms available at any one time, and be it tanks, fighter aircraft, or light sabers.
The first M-16s went to the Air Force to replace the M-1 carbine used by Air Police. I was taught in the military that a so called Assault rifle had to have 3 things. 1. Fires a substandard cartridge. Example the 7.92x33mm vs the full service round the 7.92x57mm. 2. Must be capable of "selective fire" that is a switch for semi vs full auto. 3. Have a barrel 24 inches or longer, if shorter it's a carbine. The M-16 is a carbine. The latest version of the M-16 does not have full auto capability, rather because of massive waste of ammo in Viet Nam the newest version has only 3 shot per trigger pull.
I want a gun that shoots magic bullets. A seeker bullet that never misses. Then full auto would be redundant. Perception beats reality every time. Thanks for the video
Any item used as a weapon to commit an assault is therefore, by definition, an Assault Weapon, right? So, that would call for a ban on..... well....... EVERYHTHING!
Only one problem with this video... most of the people that need to watch and understand it, won't. Very nicely done!
She mentioned Hitler, so they might listen. CZcams's algorithm on the other hand, will keep their soft little ears safe from scary pro gun videos like these.
You wanna flip a liberal on their head? Show them videos about Liberia! That place is terrifying.
She needs to use “click bait“ titles that they want to hear Ex: “Why we need to ban Assault Rifles” that gets everyone’s attention
Pretty Tone she also said “clip” instead of magazine
@@thebigbadrook4208 I only heard the word "clip" being used when she was quoting California state senator.
Undermining his argument, perhaps?
why would they have elected politicians to think and speak for them. I mean in all of history no politician has ever had a agenda that played off the trust and ignorance of the voting people! right
When I served in the military a few decades ago, I carried an automatic M-16. It was not called an assault weapon. It was called a rifle.
My AR-15 and semi-auto AK-47 both have multiple 30-round magazines, which I consider to be standard capacity.
Any issued personal arm to a military member should be quite CAPABLE of "assault". Kinda what a soldier DOES, at least under orders and IAW laws governing warfare.
"To prevent gun crime!"
Because knife crime, blunt object crime and vehicular assault crime are perfectly fine!
Don't forget chemical weapons, lots of burn victims in Europe
@@totenkopfan6296 oh I forgot that one, England is the acid attack capital of the world
"we need laws to stop r/pe"
your reply: "WHAT ABOUT THEFT, FORGERY AND DRUNK DRIVING"
Probably easier for the forensics😂😂😂😂
@@randomnameseventythree2255 Horse shit, there's no comparison. I'm pointing out YOU blame the tool for the action of a person. Your scenario has nothing to do with tools.
Of course you think if a rapist stabs a victim to death afterward it's OK because they didn't use a gun!
“HEAT SEEKING PROJECTILES”
damn.
With the ability to shoot down planes. Where can I buy these incredible weapons?
yea, where can I get some!
@@lmprdks1 Zorg Industries. The ZF-1 . It's light. Handle's adjustable for easy carrying. Undetectable by X-rays. Ideal for quick interventions. Titanium recharger, 3,000-round clip with bursts of 3 to 300. With the replay button, it's even easier. One shot... Replay sends the following shots to the same location. To finish the job, all Zorg oldies but goldies... Rocket launcher... Arrow launcher, with exploding or poisonous gas heads. Net launcher... Flame thrower... My favorite! And for the grand finale, the all new lce Cube System.
-5th Element
@@mischermer4767 Zorg Industries. The ZF-1 . It's light. Handle's adjustable for easy carrying. Undetectable by X-rays. Ideal for quick interventions. Titanium recharger, 3,000-round clip with bursts of 3 to 300. With the replay button, it's even easier. One shot... Replay sends the following shots to the same location. To finish the job, all Zorg oldies but goldies... Rocket launcher... Arrow launcher, with exploding or poisonous gas heads. Net launcher... Flame thrower... My favorite! And for the grand finale, the all new lce Cube System.
-5th Element
@@ezraloar only in the movies
I put rock salt in a shotgun shell and loaded it in my shot gun. Now I have a salt rifle
Hahaha!!! That's funny!
Haha LMAO
Smartass. 😅
lolololololololol, that was good.
*an assault rifle, sorry, but still funny as hell hahahahaha
You forgot the demonstration of a 12 gauge shotgun on camera and CNN spinning it as the "devastating power of the AR 15." Lmao
It is funny but I'm convinced there are far too many who will swallow it down whole without batting an eye.
Lmao I remember that!
No shit if you want to fear how bad it could be imagine a shooter walk into a movie theater with a couple KSG that would be about the worse case you could get close range with high cap shotguns.
I just wish someone would make rimless shells, so semi-auto mag-fed shotties stopped being a crapshoot of "man, is this thing gonna work today?".
My German Shepard looks like a police dog and military dog so is he an assault dog or only an assault dog when I have a tactical collar on him
Idk why dont you ask the left maybe theyll ban those too😂
german shepards had the highest bite rate of any dog for a long time when they were the most popular dog in the 80s #banassaultdogs
his poo can kill
My Basset Hound is.goofy looking and short although his head and teeth are almost as big as a German Shepherd. He flies under the coffee table. He is a stealth assault dog. His balls almost drag the floor and his Weiner is almost half his body length.
My Basset Hounds farts are silent killers. He drives himself out of the room but wags his tail when he does.
There’s nothing I appreciate better than well-researched articulate truth bombs. Awesome work!!
Holy shit! Somebody has a brain and has done actual research! *standing ovation*
Damn, the Doll really does her homework!!!
History ! means you got to now where you came from to know where your going !!!!! Too bad history has been lost in our schools systems and way too many CZcams videos.....
Daniel Pering ya but u can’t shoot 30 rounds per 1/2 second
2:20 my old favorite gun in BF1
@@tannerbarry6525 Nobody can do that. Also, why did you write that? It has nothing to do with my comment.
267 politicians gave this video a thumbs down cause they realize they're dumber than us lol
61 more have joined them.
I put a riot shotgun in my safe next to an assault rifle, and NOTHING HAPPENED. Neither one started any riots or assaulted one another. Someone wisely observed that a riot requires more than two participants so, I put 4 more riot shotguns into the safe and since one person can assault something I left the single AR15 in there with the riot shotguns, and added a Mini14, thinking maybe they assault each other, and riot shotguns will riot. NOTHING HAPPENED! Someone said, people can incite others to riot, and 96% of all firearms murders were committed with pistols, not long guns. So with the propensity for a pistol to commit crimes, I put several pistols into the safe, and some hunting rifles, with the riot shotguns, and the assault rifles, so after the riot ensued, those hunting rifles could hunt down the responsible riot shotguns, pistols and assault rifles. I AM STILL WAITING, AND NOTHING IS HAPPENING! Hmm?
@@Marc1onius Congrats on banning guns. It always feels good to impose your opinion via the armed presence of your police force. I f I may ask though, why aren't you banning alcohol in Germany? That product kills and maims way more people than firearms ever has or will in times of peace in democratic countries. The number of fetal alcohol children born every alone year eclipses those injured through firearms, even if Germany was to allow firearms. So, I wouldn't be too quick to jump up on your soapbox until you're ready to stow away the hypocrisy and apply the logic used to ban firearms to alcohol. That, however, would require you to give up something that you don't need, that kills and maims others, but that you like to use. That's not likely to happen, is it?
@@Marc1onius Norbert, I seem to have hit a nerve ,and you’ve assumed I’m against gun control. In fact, I haven’t stated my stance on being pro-gun or anti-gun, so I’m not sure which echo chamber you think I reside in. I’m also unsure how you jumped from my statement on alcohol to side walks, but I think you may have been not have been thinking clearly.
What I am saying is that alcohol does kill and maim children. This is done through the premeditated act of consuming a product that you know will impair your judgment. If I’m distilling what you are saying, it is guns are designed to kill, and must be banned, but other dangerous items only kill and maim through accidents, so they are OK. Am I getting that right?
Then why, may I ask, have we banned things like lawn darts? They aren’t designed to kill and maim, but are banned because they accidently did so. And so what if booze isn’t designed to kill. That is irrelevant. Booze kills 2 peoples a day in Canada in drinking and driving accidents, produces 3000+ fetal alcohol babies every year, and is responsible for 23% of all violent crime. Your telling me this is OK because “it wasn’t designed to hurt any one”.
I stand by my original assumption: you are a hypocrite who, through advocating for booze, cars that do excessive amounts of speed, etc. are condoning the death and injury of children.
@@Marc1onius Why are you lying?
@ickster23 You really shouldn't listen to him, he obviously has no clue. Germany did not ban guns. We have 5,500,000 guns that are legally owned by 1,500,000 private citicens here in germany. I myself am a legal gun owner from germany.
You have to jump through quite a bunch of hoops (take a mandatory gun-safety-class, buy a certified gun-safe, prove that you aren't a fellon, pay a bunch of fees, ...), but you can own as many guns as you want in germany. A friend of mine is a gun-collector and he owns over 800 guns. Germany has a HUGE gun sports and hunting culture. Every town has it's own "Schützenverein" - which translates to "shooting club".
We can own all sorts of guns, like AR15, revolvers and semi-auto handguns, hunting rifles, pump-action shotguns, leveraction-rifles, even sbr's in some cases. Last weekend I shot a semi-auto AK47-clone and a semi-auto 9mm carbine with a 10" barrel at a very nice competition. 150 people competed.
What we CAN'T do, is carrying the guns outside of our own property, outside the woods or outside of shooting ranges. Only government agencies, like the police, border patrol or customs and private security companies are allowed to carry guns on the streets. If you are a private citicen and you carry a gun outside your private property or a shooting range (or the woods if you are a hunter) you will pay A LOT of money. I'm talking of 11,000$ US and more. You will lose your right to posses firearms and if you were catched more than once, you will go to jail for up to 5 years. So nobody carries here. You also can't posses fireams in order to protect yourself. They are only allowed for hunting and sports - but if someone broke into your house and you are a gun owner, you are legally allowed to protect yourself with your guns. It's called "Notwehr" in germany (and "Recht muss Unrecht nicht weichen"), which is in a sense similar to your "castle-laws" and your "stand your ground laws".
In addition the 5.5 million legally owned guns, there are over 20,000,000 illegal weapons in private possesion in germany. They are for the most part leftovers from WW2 and the DDR, and a lot of .22LR rifles, which were legal to purchase for everyone prior to 1974 (and basically nobody gave them away when the government made them illegal to have). Allmost every farmer in germany has at least one illegal gun here - but they are almost never used. FUN FACT: If you own an illegal firearm in germany and someone breakes into your house - you are legally allowed to protect yourself with this gun. The police will take the gun from you and you will face charges for illegal possesion of a firearm, but NOT FOR USING IT TO PROTECT YOURSELF.
As we know now, germany has lot's of guns. More than one gun for every fourth citicen. But we don't shoot each other. The police has to shoot at only 7 to 10 people A YEAR - in whole germay. So, the number of guns can't be the reason for the number of shootings.
In my opinion it's more likely that the us social security system (or the lack of such) is a big part of the problem. In germany nobody is "really poor". Our system catches you if you fall and gives you at least a roof over your head and money for clothing and food if you lose your job and can't pay your bills. Also, our medical care system is better and nobody has to sell their house in order to pay the hospital bills (95% of all germans never saw a hospital bill in their whole live, literally EVERYTHING is covered by our health-insurance). Another big problem of the US are the drugs and the gangs - which kinda correlate, right? ;) In germany, we don't have a very poor neighbour - but the US has mexico, and they are smuggeling a lot of illegal weapons and drugs into the country.
Gun bans are proven useless (look at the UK) and they won't fix the problem. If a murderer doesn't have a gun, he takes a knife. I mean, seriously, in the stone age, they busted each others heads with stones.. That's why it's called the stone age. People will always find ways to kill each other if they want to.
@@Marc1onius that's a lie again. You are not well informed.
@@Marc1onius and a lie again.
Unfortunately... we, your audience, are the choir.
Very succinct, well done.
She’s much smarter and more informed than the average politician! 🇺🇸👍
Not really setting the bar high, but true anyway.
They may know more but act stupid when it's convenient !!
Can we get Liberty Doll for president?
Yeah, she's literally a great reader
Especially when edited
I'm just glad to see someone else around my age who gets it and isn't a liberal POS.
The AR-15 is the Honda Civic of rifles.
@Exterminence It would be a B model Mack
Why does anybody need a Honda Civic when perfectly fine Ferraris already exist?
@@BennysThoughts price
@Exterminence Toyota hilux
The Mosin Nagant is the Trabant of guns
Liberals say we should NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged by liberals to judge ALL gun owners based on the actions of a few madmen.
So the answer is simple, don't allow madmen to have guns.Just about every other nation has positive vetting, so that you have to show that you are fit to own a gun. This is just common sense,you could even allow more types of guns.
@@andrewpease3688 Bad guys will still get guns. Laws and regulation only affect the law abiding.
@@alecb8509 This is not the experience of every other civilised nation with an organised government. Are you actually in favour of allowing nutters to have guns?
@@andrewpease3688 , please provide references that support your premise. I recall that there are still shootings in countries with strong gun laws.
@@Dave-sw2dm you know what I meant. The US allows people to have assault rifles who they are not prepared to trust to board a plane.
The lady has provided an excellent definition of an assult rifle.
This is by far the best explanation of the definition of Assault Rifles I have ever heard. Good Job
I have a fully-semi-automatic assault rifle machine pistol that shoots heat seeking rounds at 3,600 RPM. I only use it for hunting of course.
What else would it be used for
Amateur! I have that but with the shoulder thing that goes up and the chainsaw bayonet!
😂 of course
does it have detachable box clipazine or does it use a belt stripper drum
ah, im shocked you could find one, you must have used the notorious gun show loophole
Being ex- military, with the m16, I knew the difference but I didn't know the complete history. Thank you. Very good video.
ken hulett thanks for your prior service
ken hulett the difference between what?
ken hulett this video only focuses on the legal definition of assault rifles, not the military classification.
Matteo Kropej the video does say the difference. She says the m16 has selective fire where as the ar15 is only semi-automatic therefor difference in fire rate resulting in different firearms
Guys, he already knew. He just wanted the complete history.
You nailed it perfectly. I deeply appreciate your summation: that the use of assault weapon verbal is PURE propaganda. Got a sub. Love your delivery. Truly fine work.
Subbed as well.
BASIC DICTATORSHIP 101 REV. - James A Wyatt, Jr.
1)THE major first step is the Gaining control by whatever means available of ALL means of communication, i.e. the news media and every other means of private and public communication;
2) That while also taking promptly total control in/of all areas of banking, finance, commerce, etc.; (See #5, below, please)
3) While also seeking to totally DIVIDE AND CONQUER this a very basic Rule for success in establishing control in an adversarial endeavor be it in War on the BATTLEFIELD or in the ‘POLITICAL WARFARE TRENCHES’ in the TARGETING OF THE NATION’S ENTIRE/TOTAL POPULATION . . . and anyone that is ‘awake’ is seeing that accomplished daily; this ‘tool’ being applied exponentially by government in general and now in particular in our United States of America today: citizen against citizen, neighbor against neighbor, that by courts and the government at both the national, state, county, city and town level; this tool so candidly stated by an appointee of the Alien Occupier: “Crisis offers Opportunity” and thus the fermenting of civil commotion in every available area is being utilized as simply yet another of the satanic tools being put in play**.
4) But most certainly of greatest importance is implementing by every means available the Totally disarming of the general population as Hitler’s National Socialist did especially targeting the Jews; Marks & Stalin’s Communist and as sought by the UN and those of the National Socialist/Communist/liberals; especially those currently in power in our nation’s government; their sole purpose is to facilitate the allowing only the ‘government’ to be armed thus establishing total dependence on the government by those of the population who are ‘law abiding’ out of fear or for whatever reason, while seeking to convey what is actually a totally false sense of safety and well-being.
5. And always find someone else to blame for any and all problems, etc, and THEN take every means necessary to vilify and then purge/slaughter THEM ONE AND ALL.
AND, WE MUST NOT FORGET . . .
6, Total destruction of the target nation’s economy is MANDATORY hence . . . DESTRUCTION FINANCE 101 THE DIVERSION -
Remember the old shell game where the huckster had three walnut shells and one pea and you were enticed to concentrate on his hand movements of the walnut shells so that you could point out the location of the pea; this while his pickpocket cohorts were working the spectators? Well friends you have been had yet again
Note:
This course of action/instruction approved by Hussein, Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Hun Sen, Kim Jong-II, Chairman Mao, Chavez, Castro, Mussolini, as well as all others of similar ilk including the Illegal Alien Occupant of our White House! - James A Wyatt Jr - Son of The Gunsmith, J.A.’Red"Wyatt 1902-1964, WYATT CUSTOM RIFLES
James A Wyatt Jr - Son of The Gunsmith, J.A.'Red"Wyatt 1902-1964, WYATT CUSTOM RIFLES
Kosciusko, MS H.S. Class of 1956; Mississippi State Univ. Class of 1961
All Hours On Site Target Risk Investigations - 8 States - 1962-1997
IN JEHOVAH GOD WE TRUST;
all else is highly suspect.
TRUTH AND REALITY IN PRESENT DAY AMERICA;
OUR ONCE GREAT NATION THAT WE, ON OUR WATCH, ALLOWED TO BE TAKEN OVER BY ROGUE CAREER POLITICIANS, THESE INCLUDING PERVERTED DEMONCRATS, MUSLIMS, COMMUNIST, GANGS OF THUGS, CHICAGO SPAWNED GANGSTERS, ROGUE POLITICIANS, PAGAN LAWYERS, HEATHENS; ONE AND ALL SATAN’S TOTALLY DEDICATED DISCIPLES.
REGARDING THE POTENTIAL FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR ONCE GREAT NATION BECOMING LIKE THAT OF GERMANY IN IT’S RISE OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM UNDER HITLER'S NAZI OR THAT OF RUSSIA AND OTHERS THAT BECAME COMMUNIST OR THAT OF OTHER NATIONAL WHERE 'GOVERNMENT WENT WILD' WITH THE RESULT THAT POTENTIAL FOR FOR CIVIL UNREST BECOMES THE CATALYST FOR CIVIL UNREST LEADING TO CIVIL WAR, AND CONDITIONS IN OUR NATION CURRENTLY GIVES STRONG INDICATION OF THAT BECOMING REALITY; ONE IS THEN FORCED TO "TAKE INVENTORY" OF ONE'S CURRENT 'SITUATION" IN THE COURSE OF WHICH THE CONCLUSION IS THAT ONE IS APPARENTLY MUCH 'BETTER OFF" THAN THE MAJORITY OF MY FELLOW CITIZENS.
BEING A SOUTHERNER, 81 YEARS OF AGE IF I MAKE IT TO NOVEMBER,27th; I WAS TAUGHT BY DAD A GUNSMITH AND BUILDER OF CUSTOM SPORTING HUNTING RIFLES, TO SHOOT BEGINNING AT AGE 5 YEARS OF AGE WITH A DAISY BB GUN FOLLOWED BY A .22 RIFLE, A .410 SHOTGUN AND A .22 HANDGUN WHICH WAS FOLLOWED AT AGE 14 BY A M1911 .45 THAT I POSSESSED WHICH HAD GONE THROUGH WWII, AND THUS WITH ABOUT 70 YEARS OF FIREARM USAGE AND QUITE PROBABLY WITH QUITE A FEW IN MY AGE GROUP WITH SIMILAR EXPERIENCE, WE OLD FOLKS SHOULD CONSTITUTE A BIT OF SUPPORT FOR OTHER OF YOU WHO ARE ARE PATRIOTIC SOUTHERN COUNTRY GUN SAVVY HUNTER EXPERIENCED FOLKS.
OUR FURTHER AND BY FAR & WITHOUT A DOUBT MAJOR ASSET BEING ALSO THAT WE ARE MOSTLY EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS AND THUS BELONG "LOCK, STOCK, AND BARREL' TO OUR LORD AND SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST AND THUS HAVE NO FEAR OF SUFFERING DEATH IN THIS LIFE IN WHICH WE NOW ARE EXPERIENCING POOR HEALTH AND THUS WITH THE ATTENDANT SUFFERING. THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT MY AND PROBABLY MANY OF YOURS ANCESTORS FOUGHT IN THE FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR, THE AMERICAN REVOLUTIONARY WAR, AND THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR AND HAVING TO FOLLOW IN THEIR FOOTSTEPS IS JUST A PART OF THE NOBLE CALLING THAT A FREE PEOPLE MUST WILLINGLY EMBRACE AS ONE OF THE MANY RESPONSIBILITIES OF BEING FREE AND IN ORDER TO EXECUTE THAT RESPONSIBILITY OUR FOREFATHERS PROVIDED OUR BILL OF RIGHTS IN GENERAL AND THE 2nd AMENDMENT IN PARTICULAR!!!!!
REGARDING THE POTENTIAL FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR ONCE GREAT NATION BECOMING LIKE THAT OF GERMANY IN IT’S RISE OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM UNDER HITLER'S NAZI OR THAT OF RUSSIA AND OTHERS THAT BECAME COMMUNIST OR THAT OF OTHER NATIONAL WHERE 'GOVERNMENT WENT WILD' WITH THE RESULT THAT POTENTIAL FOR FOR CIVIL UNREST BECOMES THE CATALYST FOR CIVIL UNREST LEADING TO CIVIL WAR; AND CONDITIONS IN OUR NATION CURRENTLY GIVES STRONG INDICATION OF THAT BECOMING REALITY; AND THE MINDSET VOCALLY DISPLAYED BY SO MANY OF THE PRESENT DAY YOUTH LENDS FURTHER EVIDENCE OF THAT POTENTIAL, THEY LIKE THEIR PARENTS OF THE ‘FLOWER CHILD’ GENERATION STEEPED IN SOCIALISM.
OUR FURTHER AND WITHOUT A DOUBT MAJOR ASSET BEING ALSO THAT WE ARE MOSTLY EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS, BELONGING "LOCK, STOCK, AND BARREL' TO OUR LORD AND SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST AND THUS HAVE NO FEAR OF SUFFERING DEATH IN THIS LIFE IN WHICH WE NOW ARE EXPERIENCING POOR HEALTH AND THUS WITH THE ATTENDANT SUFFERING. THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT MY AND PROBABLY MANY OF YOURS FOUGHT IN THE FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR, THE AMERICAN REVOLUTIONARY WAR, AND THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR AND HAVING TO FOLLOW IN THEIR FOOTSTEPS IS JUST A PART OF THE NOBEL CALLING THAT A FREE PEOPLE MUST WILLINGLY EMBRACE AS ONE OF THE MANY RESPONSIBILITIES THAT COMES WITH THE BLESSING OF BEING FREE AND IN ORDER TO EXECUTE THAT RESPONSIBILITY OUR FOREFATHERS SO WISELY PROVIDED OUR BILL OF RIGHTS IN GENERAL AND THE 2nd AMENDMENT IN PARTICULAR, THAT PROVIDED JUST IN CASE WE CAME TO THE POINT OF NEEDING TO BE ARMED AND THUS ABLE TO EFFECTIVELY AND SUCCESSFULLY CRUSH A TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT!!!!!!!
The term is real...the "assault" rifle was designed to be able to literally move forward while shouldering and firing aimed sustained fire. Storm the enemy...Sturmgewehr..Storm Rifle...but civilians own semi automatic version of this.
If you think you cant move forward laying sustained fire, or 'storm the enemy', with an AR, you probably dont actually have one.
What most of these numbnut idiots in the press and on the Left don't realize is that in 9 cases out of 10, a semi-automatic weapon is better than a fully automatic one.
I also walk around with a six barrel rotary cannon. It's a wee bit heavy, but you never know when you are going to need to take down a T-Rex.
You too huh. I put mine in a red Ryder wagon with a sticker on it that says "I wish a mofo would" also, no mofo has.
Wasn't there a lever action used in one of the jurassoc park movies that marlin or winchester later updated the specs to say it was rate for t-rex
@@testacles4807 In the Lost World (2nd Park Movie) Roland carries a .600 Nitro Express Double Barrel Elephant Gun that he was going to use to shoot a Male T-Rex. In Jurassic World (4th Franchise Movie), Owen Grady carries a .45-70 Marlin Model 1895SBL, but it was just the gun he was carrying around.
If an AR-15 had the same rate of fire as a fighter jet the barrel would melt. 🤣
Pretty sure the gas tube would meltdown first... lets use titanium gas tubs n block!
stop using logic. They can shoot as fast as a fighter jet, with heat seaking, race and religion detection systems, Assault Rifles. C'mon man you should know that from our trusted Politicians and News Media.
the bolt can't even reset that fast. That sound like a set up for a double feed.
Be sure to watch Iraq veteran 8888. He actually does do meltdown videos!
@@billygildark4565 I have melted several barrels with my SAW in the Army. But never with my M16 or AR15. Made them smoke yes but that was it.
I think we just found our new 2A spokesperson.
History ! means you got to now where you came from to know where your going !!!!! Too bad history has been lost in our schools systems and way too many CZcams videos.....
@Undarl Just give her the proper tech and you're golden. She's in a home studio, if given the prompters like pros use, she's speaking to the crowd, for the video, it's almost indistinguishable as you put the camera on top of the prompter.
Smart girls with glasses talking intelligently about firearms (miniguns+++)...looks like I found my new fav channel (heat seeking bullets!!!!!)
+josh656 hello and welcome!
It makes the wisdom on one of my .gov t-shirts ring true:
"Chicks dig guys in body armor. Guys dig chicks with guns." Keep up the good work!
"30 round clips"
"Half a second"
This is when my brain melted.
Impressive. As a former marine ordnance officer professionally familiar with the subject, she gets everything - every technical and historical detail - correct.
Every politician should have to watch this video before they can vote on any gun issue.
WharfRat0A54 agreed
You would ask yourself how politicians and pundits could hear these truths a hundred times and still not get it. I would submit that they do; they can't all be that densely stupid. But none of them would ever admit to or spread the truth because it would destroy the arguements for the anti-gun agenda they are pushing.
Even 3 years later, still great information. Great job !! 🇺🇸 👍
A gun is a gun. Assault
A gun is a gun. Assault is an action. Quit blaming the tool for the actions of lunatics!
Philip Carrell right on!!!!!!!
your wrong, my hammer assaults nails all day long. #assaultHammers
Loading is an action so loading docks don't exist. Bad argument is bad.
@@codyopperman5930 still takes a person to load in the first place before anything else can start
Been waiting for someone like you Philip Carrell a man with all the answers to come up with a sufficient way to keep these so called assualt weapons out of the hands of lunatics. The night club killing in Florida, the movie theater killing in Colorado, the Sandyhook shooting all have one thing in common. They all involved the not so dangerous AR-15. According to the lady they are not dangerous because they don't fire fully automatic. They still kill a large number of people so it is still a dangerous weapon.
I laugh every time I hear Patricia Eddinton use the prase "Heat seeking projectiles" when describing a Tracer Round...
AR-15 is an Armalite Rifle, not Assault Rifle... An it is a Semi-Automatic, for civilians.
If heat seeking .22 cal ammo becomes available, I’ll rush to the store to stock up.
She played too much Terraria
In my knowledge Chloropythe wasn't discovered yet.
@Anthony Delfos ranges, small game, home defense
Hahahaha I never knew she said that about tracer rounds! Haha in Soviet America tracer round trace you!
I also laugh when she says they are capable of shooting down airplanes. Yeah, IF the planes are low enough and slow enough. You might hit a Cessna landing or taking off but a commercial jet at 30,000 feet won't even notice and if you try to shoot at a fighter jet going 600 mph your lucky if you can pull the trigger in time. And even if the fighter pilot does notice all your going to do is just piss him off enough to turn around and give you a really bad attitude because he will have to explain to his ground crew why he has a bullet hole in their baby IF your lucky enough to hit it!!!
Finally, a cute girl that knows guns.
Looked to me as though she was reading off a tel-prompter. Good job though.
One think I love about Liberty Doll is that she does her homework,refuses to tell a lie and I've NEVER seen her tell anything that wasn't fully TRUE without noting anything she saw as questionable. When Liberty Doll says it,I KNOW it's true. I especially like that she lays it out without breaking into "Legalese". HUGS to ya,Girl!
Michael Dash have you seen Kirsten Joy Weiss? Now that is a beautiful woman who knows guns!
Is she part Asian or Scottish? Scottish girls can look pretty Asian like that so I don't know e.g. Catherine Zeta-Jones is Scottish. P.S. 6:45 Gee I wonder what ethnicity Josh Sugarman is. How'd it work out for the Jews when they turned their guns in to Hitler?!? Who's stuck on stupid much???
She’s just reading off a monitor and any person can do that
The term "Assault Rifle" actually does have a definition and you mentioned 2 of them.
1. Intermediate range cartridge.
2. Select fire.
3. Magazine fed.
Shawn Sears sorry but no such thing as "assult" rifle, assult is a verb not a noun.
Actually, the US Army published the Special Forces Foreign Weapons Handbook FSTC-CS-07-35-66, which defined ASSAULT RIFLES in 1967 in Section III, paragraph 68.a.
I have never owned a single fire arm in my life. The more these politicians with 24 hour security tell me I shouldnt own one, the more I feel inclined to go and become an owner.
@POOR PIRANO No, I know its weird but that's just how it was growing up. Im buying one soon though.
Full Auto should be legal as well. This all started because we gave them a inch and now they are taking a mile.
Depends on the year if they are older guns and get a permit for the weapon you can get an auto weapon
Joseph Congdon yeah I know it was the 1986 ban on full auto that I was referencing to as the inch we gave them. I feel that the 1986 ban needs to be repealed. The second amendment is not meant to be limited and it shouldn’t be.
@@jeep2525 I agree man
Yup, civilians should have all the same weapons the military uses. If just one is missing from the civilian population the 2nd amendment is not being followed.
@@josephcongdon427 Yeah... anyone can get a full auto.. It's only $200 and a 6 month wait for the permit... Then $20,000+ for the
weapon..
Best video on the subject I have seen in a very long time.
I am very grateful that you did. I often fume silently when the antis
lie about things and other folks just accept it as fact. I put a link
on my channel so everyone of my views has an opportunity to see this.
Aw, thank you so much! I really appreciate that. :)
+Liberty Doll good job this is the most detailed and fact filled video on this love your videos keep up the good work
But but... my AR is black, I thought the libs love black. Oh, only in election years....
At one point, you said ar-15, but put a picture of a m16a4
I THANK YOU SO MUCH I have tried so many times to say this on every site an know one won'ts to hear that a AR15 is not an assault rifle
@Exterminence I'm sorry I did not spell something wright an after you talk sh*t would you at least tell me what I done to get you mad at me
So what? What does it matter what you call them. They are still the same weapon, the weapon of choice for mass murderers.
30 round clip per second....the rifle's barrel would melt. Pretty and Smart....wow!
You know what's really telling? There isn't anybody who is actually experienced or knowledgeable on the topic of firearms talking about banning anything or making new laws. It's only people who don't know jack shit about guns.
It's like, if somebody wanted me to start making laws about cars but I don't have a license, never owned a car and never learned how to drive. So, I don't know jack shit about cars. Who in their right mind would put me in charge of making laws that would affect millions of Americans?
I find that in trying to bring up a similar point I am given the retort that "then men shouldn't be able to talk about illegalizing 'muh birf contro' (birth control for non Freedom Toons fans) and 'muh abortion' because they don't know what its like to be a woman". For anyone else out there who has experienced this and may read my comment here, this is for you. Don't be confused by their attempt to bring in an unrelated argument. There are a few key differences, the most clear-cut one being that anti-gunners rarely seem to take an interest in educating themselves on the topic and instead like to regurgitate slogans, buzzwords, fallacies, and half-truths that they are spoon fed in their political echo-chamber. In contrast, I would say that most men understand, at least at an intellectual level, the struggle of birthing and raising a child even if they have not experienced it themselves. Slightly muddier, there is also a difference in morality to the argument. There is nothing inherently moral or immoral about owning a firearm any more so than there is in owning a knife, car, pencil, jazz CD, or any other inanimate object. There is a valid, if debatable, argument for the morality of birth control and more specifically abortion not only in legality, but also in the public funding of the aforementioned. It doesn't necessarily take first hand knowledge or even much knowledge of a subject to debate it's morality. I don't need to have a high degree of knowledge about how to kill a man in cold blood to know its immoral to murder. I don't need to have ever robbed a jewelry store to know that theft is immoral. I don't need to have ever had a romantic relationship to know that cheating on one's partner is immoral. I don't need to have ever given birth to argue that killing a fetus before it even has a chance at life is immoral. To some that all may have seemed like nuance, but nuance is important. That's the end of my slightly off topic little rant. Hope it helps someone make a strong coherent argument.
Aidan Druck - Try as I might, I couldn't follow along. You need to break that LOOOOONG runonsentenceparagraphinto separate paragraphs with punctuation.
Just a suggestion.
Well I'll take your suggestion on breaking my arguments up into more easily digestible paragraphs in the future. However, I think my punctuation is adequate though it might contain some errors. Particularly with the commas. I sometimes worry about over-punctuating and improper comma placement. As for run-on sentences, I can see one, maybe two that are borderline run-on.
Since you were kind enough to leave me some constructive criticism and you had trouble following my argument, I'll attempt to increase my clarity. Here goes.
In attempting to make the same or a similar point to the original comment, I have come across a counter argument that is poorly made. It is to the effect of "you say I shouldn't argue for anti-gun policy because I am not knowledgeable enough. Then men shouldn't argue for anti-birth control/abortion policy because they don't give birth".
The most clear difference between these two things is in the effort of either side to educate themselves and make good arguments. Anti-gunners frequently substitute actual knowledge and logic with slogans, buzzwords, fallacies, and half-truths. On the other hand, I believe most men understand at some level the hardships of giving birth to and raising a child. They may not have actually experienced childbirth, but they can appreciate just how much of a burden it can be. They understand how raising a child, especially when unprepared, can derail someone's life plans.
The second and less clear-cut difference is in the argument of morality. There is nothing any more inherently immoral about owning a firearm than there is in owning any inanimate object. In contrast, there is a valid, yet debatable argument to be made for the morality of abortion and birth control. Well, two arguments really. One for the morality of actually terminating a pregnancy and the other for the morality of making taxpayers fund it. My point here is that it does not take the same level of knowledge of a subject to debate its morality. Its not like analyzing statistics, debating the long term results of an action, or even debating the function of something. A person doesn't need to know how to kill to know that murder is wrong. A person doesn't have to have been in a relationship to know that cheating on their partner is wrong. And a person doesn't have to have given birth to argue that killing an unborn fetus is immoral.
I hope that was a little more clear for you to understand. I don't think I could have broken that up anymore without using sentence fragments or breaking my points up too much. I don't want to make my argument disjointed, you know?
I got the same message from both of your posts, well written, thank you. Maybe Uberragen is a little slow. But I think he's just the proverbial 'turd in the punch bowl'.
I suspected as much, but I like to give people the benefit of the doubt.
Beautiful and knowledgeable, rare traits among our species.
A cute girl that knows guns. Wow
I imagine she is just as cute when she wakes up in the morning and is not all made up.
A cute girl that has facts and knows how to use them. Whoever she fell in love with is a very lucky person.
Where do we find women like her?
Max MAX ,,,, Get a grip bruh it’s CZcams XD
Not saying she knew some or most of this but there is this new thing that you may here about one day, studying.
Thank you Liberty Doll. Very few out there have your finesse and honestly in correctly informing us of what's going on and it's greatly appreciated
I think we should change the name of ARs to freedom rifle
Clancey Russell freedom stick is less threatening to the snow flakes
Clancey Russell: yeah! And chase down a handful of freedom fries with a double deuce can of Budweiser.
AR stands for armalite rifle in reference to the material they're made out of. She actually talks about that briefly.
it has often been called America's Rifle
Good ol' FR-15
Banning weapons WILL NOT REDUCE CRIME... CRIMINALS DON’T CARE ABOUT LAWS!!! if more people are equipped to defend themselves, crime will reduce. Any crime that still happens will be stopped almost immediately by people that are armed and ready to defend themselves and others
@@adversaryamerican6822 according to the CDC guns have been used defensively to save roughly between 500,000 to 3 million people per year. And many times just by brandishing the weapon and not firing them.
@@adversaryamerican6822 Looks like someone is still triggered after the 2016 Presidential Election.
Adversary American Prohibited from issuing reports on gun violence is true. However the study referenced isn’t about gun violence it’s about defensive use of firearms among private citizens which doesn’t classify as violence. Don’t believe me? You can look on the CDC website for the study.
Daniel Brown show me ten instances of a gun being used to defend someone that saved lives
@@adversaryamerican6822
There's a town, Kennesaw, Georgia, that has a law that mandates, that every household must have at least one firearm for protection. The Kennesaw, law was activated the same day that Morton Grove, Illinois, banned all weapons within the city limits. Violent Crime in Kennesaw, Georgia is almost zero, where violent crime in Morton Grove has flourished since the ban of firearms. Living proof that most criminals will not attempt a home break in, of a home, that has a gun that will KILL them.
BTW, I live just outside the Kennesaw city limits, so I've seen how effective this law is. Please note that Kennesaw, does not arrest those homeowners that violate the law by not owning a gun. The law just lets criminals know that more than likely a gun is behind every front door of a house they may think about breaking into. This law works extremely well.
An attractive female that has a real knowledge of guns... yes please
Vernon Pinkley (the dirty dozen) Pretty, very pretty, but can they fight?!
bailey: I would put my money on her vs any libtard man in a gun fight....
Meh, she's intelligent pretty.
@@ericsimpson1176 Eric; when you see vids of LAW MAKERS trying to lift a rifle up to their shoulder (sometimes backwards) you realize that is a safe bet.
@@reedrk88t intelligence is pretty to me! ;
There is literally no such thing as an Assault Rifle... If its an AR its an Armalite. The term Assault Rifle is also grammatically incorrect.
It is correct. It was coined in late ww2 to describe the german select fire intermediate cartridge rifle.
I own 6 different ar style rifles none of them were made by Armalite or any other gun manufacturer for that matter but I'm pretty sure they are all considered ghost assault rifles even though three of them are pistols
Great Video! Another ignorant statement that I’ve heard on soooo many occasions is that “well the AR-15’s own name states that it’s an assault rifle” when asked what the HELL they are talking about, many don’t know how to answer that because all they are doing is repeating something that they themselves have heard somewhere and instead of taking 5 mins to learn something for themselves and verify what they’ve been told, they just accept it. Others would actually try to have a meaningful debate when asked what the hell they were talking about and would say “of course AR-15’s are assault rifles, what do you think the “AR” stands for?” Smh. Every single person that Ive encountered with this understanding of assault rifles was flabbergasted when I explained that a 5 min research on the matter would have set the record straight a long time ago and explained to them that the inventor of the AR-15 Eugene Stoner worked for Armalite Arms Co and therefore his rifle was named after his company the “A”(Armalite) “R”(Rifle). Why is it that no one seems to understand nor practice the old saying that when we are “told”
something that we should trust BUT VERIFY what it is that we are being told? Such ignorance and laziness to just sit back and believe everything that we are TOLD!! Keep spreading the truth Doll, you ARE part of the solution!
I've wondered for a very long time if I was the only one who knew what the term " AR" meant!! Splendid!
I used to have an assault rifle. It insisted on shooting people. Why, it aimed itself at people even as I pled with it to stop. It never listened to me, just aimed itself and shot people. One time it aimed itself at ME and told me to shut up before it shop me! Once it had emptied its chamber, I could jump on it and got it melted down into a large bar. Then, since it couldn't shoot people, it wanted to start bludgeoning people. Now it's in my back yard chained up on both ends so it can't hurt anyone anymore.
BRAVO Sleeper, Well said!
Incorrect AR does not stand for Assault Rifle it is the initials of the company that created the rifle "Armalite Rifle" do your homework.
Who are you talking to?
Thanks for shuttin' em down, Liberty Doll!
In the 18th century charleville musket was an assault weapon.
Great video. I would only add that weight was a big factor in developing the M16. The lighter weight of the gun and its ammo meant that soldiers could carry more ammo with them
I can’t take any politician seriously who doesn’t care enough about a topic to at least educate themselves on the terminology. Why be willfully ignorant?
So they can pander to the equally uninformed citizens. No sense in confusing them with facts.
You know those politicians are bought out cunts?
More like INTENTIONALLY DECEITFUL.
An assault weapon is any weapon that the government does not want civilians to own. In other words, "all firearms". Hopefully that clears up any confusion.
No an assault rifle is a selective fire rifle with a caliber higher than that of a pistol but lower than a battle rifle.
It's it's own category of arms but the AR 15 simply ain't fitting of that requirement.
John Wills, While you are correct on an assault RIFLE the original post is on assault WEAPON, and in such the original poster is fully correct.
John Wills, all that has been thrown out by proposed WA state initiative 1639. Any rifle that uses the gas from a fired round to cycle the action will become an assault rifle... including Ruger 10/22 (all 22lr. Rifles).
Timeless2, In what I've read on that it seemed to me that even a semi-auto gas operated shotgun would fall under that as well. If you have any insight/info to correct my thought one way or the other I would be grateful. Curious Ohioan here.
BloodRaven1969, the term used in the proposed initiative is “rifle”.... I guess that will be up to legislators to see if that applies to shotguns...
This was an amazing vlog. I do however wish she would have mentioned that, James Brady, the person whom the Brady Bill or the Brady Campaign was named after, was not shot by anything even close to an "assault rifle", but a pre-world war two german six shot revolver......
+Edward Gagarin I actually didn't know what! Thanks for the trivia
I thought it was a Ruger Mark 2 .22LR
So what's your point? Isn't anything that contributes to reducing negligent gun ownership a good thing? The Brady bill dose NOT pretend in any way to address "assault rifles" so you conflating the two shows your dishonesty more than anything else really.
Its a fact that Americans devotion to guns make it a real possibility that some fool, pissed off at his spouse or neighbour , will go get a gun a nd shoot him in the heat of the moment the same way he will go back to his car and get a baseball bat or go back to his garage and get a machete or whatever. so if you can get him to cool off for a day or two that's a good thing. Yeah, I am well aware that it wont prevent ALL people from going back after the five days , getting the gun and shooting your dumb husband for blowing leaves onto his lawn but if it saves a life then it a good thing.
point to any law that would have stopped any of the mass shootings. the youtube shooter passed a background check and waited the ten days before her little assault in gun-hating california. surely you must know that gun-related death (especially involving long arms of any type) account for a small number of deaths while the left by comparison ignore all the far more common causes of preventable deaths. it's much easier to suppress our civil rights.
come on now that's a scottsmans fallacy. We know from both anecdotal and philological evidence that MOST people will cool own from a bad temper and reconsider a bad course of action given time. That's why you grab you dumbass drunk friend at the bar when his beer muscles tell him that the huge bodybuilder who accidentally spilled is drink is an easy mark.
I am severely disappointed in your response about California. I was hoping that some class would prevail and not have anyone gloat simply because of a failure in a system that's otherwise working and point to that as a failure of the system itself. That's like saying that the army was wrong to buy the Abrams tank because rebels destroyed one with an RPG.
Yes I am intimately aware of the stats. I deal with them everyday. So let me tell you a stat that people don't like. States with the most gun control has the least gun related crimes. So the next statement is no way , look at Chicago. The problem with that is this. If your neighbour has a huge tree your yard will always be full of leaves even if you cut down you own tree.
The real problem that these kids have are the gun nuts who refuse to admit that guns are a real problem. We can all say till we are blue in the face that people kill people not guns but there is no denying that its PEOPLE with GUNS who kill people. Yes , again I know, knives, cars , blah blah blah. We require that you be trained and licensed and insured in the case of cars (driving is a privilege , blah..) but the analogy is still valid. Gun nuts think that the kids who suffered trauma beyond comprehension are whiners " that they have no clue what they are even fighting for. These kids are just parroting what they've heard from fakestream media".
When you have a kid who shakes at the thought of going to school, when you find your kid curled up UNDER her bed when she should be asleep, when your son shits himself when you tell him its time to go back to school then you can say they "hey have no clue what they are even fighting for. "
Look I do not in the least advocate the banning of guns or even the repeal of the second amendment really. I don't think its really necessary or would even be particularly effective. And for all the morons out there talking about the "liberals" want a gun grab the stupidity of such a statement boggles the mind but people still believe it anyway. In my opinion no single action will fix the problem of people , usually young white conservative males, shooting masses of people in confined spaces as a way of solving even minor social and societal differences. (yes again, young black males kill each other at an alarming rate so why is no one talking about that){for the record its been spoken about loudly}
Background checks, which the NRA opposes , is a great start. Philological evaluations should be a normal part of those background checks. Violent convictions across state lines is also should be a part of these checks. The issue is that these are confidential and doctors cannot report findings unless they feel there is an eminence of immediate violence. Requiring a simple waiting period will not stop gun violence or stop violence per se. What it will do is stop one or two people from killing a few people and that matters when the one or two people are your wife or mother or your kid.
Gonna eat my wheaties with my military style assault spoon now .... i'm feeling risky ...and a little scary lol
Anything can be used for assault as well as defense and guard. Cars and cigarettes kill more people than guns.
The term "assault" in "assault rifle," refers to the MILITARY action, meaning to storm or attack rapidly. "Assault rifle" defines a group of firearms possessing very specific features. "Assault WEAPON" is the politically contrived term.
@Cherokeeman
Lolz
Nice appeal to authority fallacy. Military service does NOT automatically qualify you as an expert in any way. I am NOT talking out of my ass. Whether you have heard the term used in the military is irrelevant. The term "assault rifle" DOES exist in firearms nomenclature. It is NOT a political term, nor a liberal attempt to relabel something. You are quite clearly conflating "assault RIFLE" with "assault WEAPON," two entirely different terms. "Assault rifle" has existed as a term since the mid-40s, starting with the German Sturmgewehr 44, which means "assault rifle" in German. Even the M-16 is classified as an assault rifle - the U.S. government officially classifies it as "Rifle, M-16," but it IS an assault rifle, even if not officially labelled as such, as it meets all the requirements of an assault rifle. "Assault weapon" is the political term, referring to a semi-automatic firearm with any of a number of cosmetic features that allegedly make it more popular with criminals. I suggest you educate yourself on proper nomenclature, so as to avoid making an ass out of yourself in the future. And stop assuming your military service makes you an expert.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_rifle
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_weapon
@Cherokeeman
Lolz
I literally handed you the definitions of both an assault rifle and an assault weapon, and you are still trying to argue your point. I am going to guess that you did not read them. The term "assault rifle" does NOT need to exist in military parlance for the term to be recognized in firearms nomenclature. Just because the M-16 is listed in Army inventories as "Rifle, M-16," and not "Assault Rifle, M-16," likewise does not discount its use in firearms nomenclature. It has been a documented APOLITICAL term since 1945. It is NOT misused except in political circles, and then only by people who do not know what the term actually means. If it were not a recognized term in firearms nomenclature, Congress would not have used it, quite specifically, in the Hughes Amendment to FICO. Once again, you have demonstrated your commplete ignorance in the face of evidence and reasoned argument. The only one getting his ass handed to him is you, by a civilian who has spent literally his entire life surrounded by guns.
@Cherokeeman
Lolz
The only thing you handed me was a victory, while only further proving your own ignorance. Reason first, I provided a link that proved my assertion regarding assault rifles. You have offered no supporting evidence for your rebuttal other than personal experience, which is only anecdotal and is not considered academically credible. Reason the second, you insist that "assault rifle" is a political term, but have not provided evidence to support that claim. Meanwhile, I have also provided a link to the definition of "assault weapon," which also supports my claim to its political origin. Reason the third, a firearm's classification is not dependent on any military's official adoption of the term, but rather based entirely on whether or not it fits a list of specific, objective criteria. You seem to have a hard time grasping the idea that the military does not always define how things are classified. Whether you care to admit it or not, you are wrong. As you keep making verifiably false assertions, I can only surmise you did not look into the links I provided. Regardless, the fact remains that "assault rifle" is a purebred stallion, while "assault weapon" is the mythical unicorn.
I highly suggest you quit while you are far behind. You possess neither the knowledge base, evidende, nor faculties to engage me effectively on this matter.
I really love this young woman and the way she has her shit together with this presentation !
Great video ! I remember the news saying a shooter used a. Ar-15 shotgun
Leabo Arizona Gunsmith did it fire a 30 caliber clip magazine?
Leabo Arizona Gunsmith while there are AR-15 shotguns now they are rare and are just now hitting the market.
thisisntme yes but this was back a year or two and their no way they knew that lol!
Quintus Aurelius Symmachus yes it fired a 30 caliber clip magazine. And shoot 60 rounds a second lol
thisisntme they make ak 50 cal now you cant stop progress and you cant legislate violence
The term Sturmgewehr describes the type of troops who would use it - assault troops (in WWI they were called "Stosstruppen" - shock troops) This is easily confirmed by the existence of the FG-42, or "Fallschirmjaegergewehr 42". Fallschirmjaeger is the German term for paratroopers. Gewehr is German for "rifle". By the way, the AR in AR-15 stands for "ARmalite", not Armalite Rifle or Assault Rifle.
Paused in the middle to suggest that a definition of "full auto" would have been helpful to those viewers who are ignorant about firearms. Overall good work.
She is ridiculously pretty
@Ben Smith
But married!
Unfortunately, there might just be several women like her in this country, but alas, 99% of them are married while the other 1% is scattered all over the US!!!
Making them as rare as hens teeth!!
You nailed it. Brilliant report on how the news, politicians and anti gun have it all wrong. My AR15s are all long rifles not assault rifles.
Thank you for this amazing history lesson. I wish more people would listen to this to open their eyes to the truth.
They're classifying any long gun with a detachable magazine, a pistol grip, and a muzzle device as an "assault weapon"
No true go look up the definition in a dictionary instead of setting up a straw man.
@@unclesteven21 yea and hes talking about liberals
Well technically most guns are made to
Kill, not in a massacre way but to kill animals for food or to kill in self defense or to kill in war but technically still a killing instrument
@ he's saying that guns were designed to kill, actually all weapons were, knives, swords, spears, ax's, bow and arrows, however how a person uses them is the difference,
@@paladan00 yes at least someone understands but ammo- sexuals like ihc terra have a knee jerk reaction to what I said about a normal gun's purpose which is to kill (in self defense and hunting) but gun nuts are so scared of their guns being demonized they won't admit the purpose of some guns but when people say some guns are made for killing they don't mean it's for massacres because only a libtard would think that but it's made to penetrate
Brilliant girl and some very accurate points!
Hey-SHE doesn't DO junk-journalism....
MJ Leeflang She has the 3 Bees.....Beautiful, Brilliant and Bold....my kind of woman!
Were they sticking out? I missed them? Damn!
Correction....
None are an assault rifle unless they were used to assault someone...
Otherwise.. it's just a long gun
I agree with you. But that wont get antigun people to watch the video if that's all I say, lol.
They are assault rifles if they fit the definition of an assault rifle.
Assault rifle is a legit term used by multiple countries.
I guess I disagree with millions of people ..
You mean *A LONG BOI*
No, they're never assault rifles. That is a made up term. If that is the case then baseball bats, forks, spoons, a frying pan, etc. are all assault weapons.
Actually, machine guns weren’t “banned” in 1986, they were regulated in 1934 along with “destructive devices”, where they needed to be registered with the Dept. of the Treasury and a $200 fee for machine guns and $5 for destructive devices (ie grenades).
In 1968 MGs and DDs, as well as Carbine Rifles and Sawn Off Shotguns (barrels under 18 inches and overall length under 26 inches), silencers, and gas masks were banned under the Gun Control Act which also banned purchasing a gun outside of your own state of residence.
In 1986 all of those items were re-legalized under Ronald Reagan with the Firearm Owner Protection Act allowing citizens to own those items again, provided their resident state doesn’t prohibit possession of them, they are not prohibited from possessing any firearms, they must register them with the Dept. of the Treasury and pay the fees. Anyone selling or making those items must have an FFL and an M3 license, provided their resident State doesn’t prohibit it.
Wrong... go read the FOPA. It clearly BANS civilian ownership of any machine gun MANUFACTURED after 1986. MANUFACTURED AFTER 1986...you tried to be slick and knowledgeable and instead you look terribly ignorant.
a lot of them are .223 caliber which is effectively a varmint round. but scary looking groundhog rifle isn't menacing enough
Exactly, the .223 is very popular with varmint hunters and ranchers. The lightweight design of the AR makes it easier to tote around for long periods, than its bolt action counterpart and the gas operation reduces recoil significantly. It's great for protecting livestock from wolves, dingos, etc. I wouldn't trust it with an angry bear though, or a large elk. I think for large game like that I would feel more comfortable with a 30-30 lever action, or a 30-06, semi like the Remington 7400.
Maybe to avoid the “scary factor” we could introduce a pink colored AR-15 with painted flowers on the stock. 🤢🤮
@@abrooks4108 ar10 I would hope would stop a bear
@@cynthiamoon372 The Hello Kitty AR
David Stairs A .223 puts out more energy than a .357.
Perfect, accurate, and ultimately.
The truth.
Thank you for your ability to google. Something politicians haven't seemed to discover.
You're as intelligent as you are beautiful. Thanks for the knowledge. Keep up the great work.
Excellent vid "Liberty Doll." Brava.
Ahhh the most education, accurate...and attractive news channel on the internet!
Also, never mind the fact that the main function of fully automatic fire in a military application is for suppressive fire. Other than that, usually semi-auto or two to three shot burst is used. Being able to dump a 30 round mag with one trigger pull won't help much if you can't hit the broad side of a barn and most untrained civilians wouldn't be able to with a full auto function!
I know I shot several full autos when I visited SC and aiming just wasn't a real option lol
Though sub-machine guns can be pretty accurate like the Kriss Vector. And that's 1200 per minute. Dang.
Thank you Liberty! Now, if we can only get the masses to listen to the truth.
I will tell you how: Save this in your favorites (I am going to) and paste it whenever you need it.
Don't waste your time. People are sick of NRA bullshit.
Nailed 100%. Fighting the gun myths is difficult yet necessary if our rights are to be protected. Assault rifles must have select fire capability to be classified as assault rifles.
So what? Call them whatever you want. They are still what murderers use and should be banned.
@@healthquest4823 Actually murderers use whatever is easiest to conceal, which is pistols. If not that, knives are more often used. If you ban them, then the only people that won't have them are people like you and me, those who obey the law.
@@DARIVSARCHITECTVS I was talking about mass murderers...like in Las Vegas and so many other places.
As far as normal one on one murders are concerned, statistics show that if a person owns a gun for self defense, there is a 43 times greater chance he will use it to commit suicide or murder someone himself than shoot an assailant. There is also the problem of children finding it and killing themselves or someone else. My own father kept a 25 caliber pistol under his mattress. A girlfriend of my sister found it and pointed it at my sister. She started screaming her head head off, and my mom ran into the room before the girl pulled the trigger and snatched it from her. It might have been on safety though and possibly didn't have a round chambered, but I'll never know. I'm not really an anti gun freak. I've owned several including a Daewoo assault rifle. But, if more lives would be saved without them than with, who I'm I to argue they all shouldn't be banned? Most countries do you know.
SERIOUSLY? Where can I get them heat seeking .556 rounds !?
Betos got em
@@FREEDOMDEVIN Hahaha
came for the guns, stay for the pretty face
^WILDLY popular 5:27
Funny because I feel the opposite
Im with you on this a little. I came for both. I could marry a woman with values like this. Real talk
That was great. I love laughing at the politicians who attempt to define "Assault Rifle". They never fail at tripping over themselves & sounding foolish beyond description. Hell lately I've heard some having trouble explaining "High Capacity Magazine" let alone the entire gun. HOWEVER- messing with our 2A is not a laughing matter at all. Keep up the good work.
Well researched, and truthfully spoken. "You can't handle the truth" is my mantra to ideologues and their sheep.
J.L. Roberts yeah no she didnt
Shes so damn cute 😘
Assault rifles are fully automatic military rifles. No civilian assault rifles sold for many years. The term is a magazine not a clip.
Agreed. I am still impressed by the knowledge and research this lady has done.
Very well said young lady, keep up the good work. Thank You.
Damn you know how to wear a pair of eyeglasses. Thank you for the perfect videos to show my gun confused friends.
ACCORDING TO LAW WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO OWN ANYTHING THE MILITARY DOES.
You deserve more views, great video 👍
Side Note; the Soviets created the AK 47 (designed in 1947, go figure) based on captured SG 44s.
crash406 adopted in 47
crash406 Mr. Kalashnikov added a few features making it easier for commies to build them in huge numbers.
designed in 1945 and 1946 actually first produced in 1947 and adopted in 1949
The 7.62x39mm cartridge for the AK47 was first chambered in the SKS rifle and predates the AK by several years.
Regardless of where the idea came from, they nailed it with the ak.
"features that appear useful in Military and criminal applications"
so anything that fires a projectile. so my crossbow is an assault rifle?
Arthiem hell that definition describes knives and clubs too
And computers too
In the middle ages it probably was. ^^
a slingshot or a paper clip and rubber band 2
A projectile is a missile that has been launched from a fire arm, so: A missile is "an object which is forcibly propelled at a target, either by hand or from a mechanical weapon.
"
Therefore, if any of us has the capacity to pick up a stone and propel it at an animate or inanimate target, we are an assault weapons! We should surrender our selves to the government and let them feed, clothe and house us.
I’m now going out to drive my Honda Assault Vehicle!!
This lady is well spoken and completely studied in the words, “assault rifle”
2nd video I have watched. I just subscribed. You are courageous and I want to thank you for trying to be a voice of reality in this ever-increasingly confused world.
Thank you!
Former Green Beret special forces soldiers here...Forget most everything you heard in this video...
There is only One thing that (Turns) a rifle into an Assault Rifle...
The rifle Must have an Apparatus near the end of the barrel so that a Bayonet can be mounted...
1. You either are shooting combatants with your rifle... or
2. You mount the bayonet in order to charge at the enemy to assault and impale them....sometimes doing both.
The Rifle only Becomes an Assault Rifle when you are Charging them to impale them with the Bayonet...
The First Assault rifles were used before and during Revolutionary War when they mounted their Bayonets onto their Musket long guns....
What makes a true (Assault Riffle)has Nothing to do with ::
1. The color
2. The shape or appearance...long or short
3. Semi or full auto
4. Magazine or not
5. How many rounds it will hold
Assault Rifles have been used in every war or conflict...
During WW1,Soldiers used their rifles to assault the enemy with their Bayonets on a daily basis.The Marines did as well in the Pacific islands during WW11.
Before there was gunpowder,soldiers were assaulting one another with Spears....think about that...
One last thing....The AK-47 was originally designed for mainly one purpose,it was a weapon to be used in close quarters combat in urban warfare (town and villages). The long range guns were big,long and heavy to shoot in street fighting around corners,tight places in side of buildings and rooms and ally ways...that's it...
"Rifle" and "musket" are different guns. A bayonet on a musket does NOT make it an assault rifle as it's not a rifled gun...
My favourite "pedantry" is that there are no submachine guns in the world except Thompsons...
Not at all true.
An assault rifle is a magazine fed rifle, firing an intermediate cartridge, with selective fire capability.
The US army doesn't even issue bayonets anymore.
@@brianjordan2192 Last I heard, the M9 and OKC-3S were still in service.
@@No1sonuk
Not in the US army. My son and son in law are both soldiers right now, and they were surprised that no bayonets were issued anymore.
Maybe in the marines, I'm not sure, but not in the army.
@@brianjordan2192 Interesting.
They are in the British army.
Mainly because it's also a survival knife, wire cutters, etc. as well.
"Assault rifle" is not a term used to create propaganda. "Assault Weapon" is a term used to create propaganda. "Assault Rifle" is a term for which the U.S. Army has a definition, unlike "Assault Weapon" for which the U.S. Army does not have a definition.
True
You need to be on CRTV
These people are literally logically challenged.
love you and your videos girl keep up the good work.....
Wow, I can't think of one thing wrong with this, or even one thing missed. Well done.
Great job LD! The history is complex but you gave a good overview without going off into the weeds on the political, technical or legal angles.
She’s very knowledgeable, and nailed it. Thank you
And have you noticed that in the hands of citizens, an AR15 is an
"Assault Rifle"
But when in the hands of Law Enforcement an AR15 is a
"Patrol Rifle" or "Tactical Rifle"
Tactical rifle does make more sense and provokes no insult to my mind. I've known for decades that the AR- 15 was a repeater gun, not an automatic one. The biggest thing looming in our populace, to me anyway, is the "sex appeal" kind of thing where in the dark minds of some who would carry out demonic acts on other citizens, venture to the AR's and the likes because they were designed for the express purpose of killing people. That's the attraction, no matter what labels they put on those guns, they are in the family of military grade and ill informed politicians are muddying the case to discuss this further with poor understandings.
@@whalesong999 Actually, you should be insulted... that's the whole point of my post: the fact that their propaganda campaigns are insinuating that the exact same rifle in a citizens hands is an evil "assault rifle" who's only purpose is to kill... but in the hands of police, suddenly that exact same AR15 is a righteous "tactical rifle". Bullshit. And a semi-auto-only AR is anything but "military grade"... that was the whole point of Colt releasing the original SP-1 AR15 back in the 1960's.- Was that it was a civilian grade weapon capable of semi-auto-only fire, and only "looked" like it's true "military grade" full-auto capable counterpart... the M-16. Any soldier or mercenary would laugh at you if you suggested they take a semi-auto-only rifle into a combat arena.
canada equips its soldiers with semi-auto rifles (ar-15 coincidentally). the reasoning is that it saves ammo and makes them aim more carefully before pulling the trigger. kind of works for them. :)
however, full auto is not for hitting anyone, since that almost never happens anyways. full auto is for making a lot of noise in order to scare the opponent and drive them to duck, which at the same time prevents them from aiming at you : this improves your chances for survival.
this happens in particular when you storm an enemy base (hence the name 'sturmgewehr'), and when you have to immediately react to a sudden attack on you, which is why security personnel carries submachine guns. same goes for any civilian who has to live in or make it through inner-city drive-by shooting infested areas. which is why there is absolutely no justification to banning civilian ownership of machine guns - self-defense is legal.
the 2A is about preventing any minority from ruling overbthe majority, be it the street corner gangster ruling over his victims, or a government refusing to obey its people.
this obviously requires keeping and bearing the most capable arms available at any one time, and be it tanks, fighter aircraft, or light sabers.
@@neinnein2669
You're preaching to the choir, but thanks for your input. Best Regards. Molon Labe.
The first M-16s went to the Air Force to replace the M-1 carbine used by Air Police. I was taught in the military that a so called Assault rifle had to have 3 things. 1. Fires a substandard cartridge. Example the 7.92x33mm vs the full service round the 7.92x57mm. 2. Must be capable of "selective fire" that is a switch for semi vs full auto. 3. Have a barrel 24 inches or longer, if shorter it's a carbine. The M-16 is a carbine. The latest version of the M-16 does not have full auto capability, rather because of massive waste of ammo in Viet Nam the newest version has only 3 shot per trigger pull.
I want a gun that shoots magic bullets. A seeker bullet that never misses. Then full auto would be redundant.
Perception beats reality every time.
Thanks for the video
iamedbytes Weapons like those do exist. Good luck buying any...
I stick with the military's definition . A rifle that has select fire.
Any item used as a weapon to commit an assault is therefore, by definition, an Assault Weapon, right? So, that would call for a ban on..... well....... EVERYHTHING!
I believe that this is needs to be broadcast every day during primetime on All mainstream media outlets for a month every other month.