Mary Queen of Scots is my 15th great grandmother.I'm 5'11" and so is my daughter as Mary was. I'm so glad her son James was made King. I'm angry what Queen Elizabeth allowed. She should have worried what heaven may have done with her soul for what she did to Mary.
@@kathleenhamilton1308 also I’d Stuart ancestry. Do you have that Mary Stuart nose? My brother and one sister have a very similar nose and mouth to what you see in paintings.
Well I'm sure if Elezabeth 1 had been in Mary's shoes she'd plotted against Mary...Mary had a life, it was stolen, as was her right to the throne I have all empathy for poor Mary she only wanted her life and freedom and child back RIP Queen Mary Stuart
a great blog on Queen Mary. Whilst i have always loved our great history, during lockdown, my son and i embarked on a voyage of discovery on my father scottish roots and found out some remarkable facts. It turns out my great grandfather x12 was Sir James Balfour of Pittendreich. He was reported to have been Mary Queen of Scots favorite Advisors but also had a hand in the assination of Queen Marys Husband Lord Darnley & very probably her downfall too. A bit of a scoundrel but rather bizarrely, he was so cunning and devious, he managed to survive that turbulent era and kept his head!
How very interesting! Perhaps you should write or commission a book on him? Especially as it’s Mary Queen of Scots, her life still captivates so many people. Much is written about royalty themselves but far less about those who brought them either support, rebellion or death. I do envy you! My ancestors are all dull, poverty stricken peasants from Lancashire and Northumberland.
@@Drinadraws thank you Alexandra. It was quite a discovery seeing that my son and I were merely researching my father's biological father as he has remained - till now a mystery. You can only imagine my excitement finding out the Mary Queen link!! Just wished i was able to tell my dad it all before he died 4 yrs ago. As it happens, he was born into very poor and humble farming household but joined the army at 17 where he then had a very distinguished 33 year army career rising to the rank of Regimental Sergeant Major. I am very proud of him
There is speculation if she was really involved in the plot. I've listened to a lot of lectures and they all have good points. Isn't history amazing? We will really never know
I read that Henry Lord Darnley appeared to have been strangled. It seems he and a servant escaped into the garden before the explosion. Marks of strangulation were found on both of their necks
Actually, no marks were found on his neck. They're positive he was murdered. They believe a pillow, however, was used to murder him via suffocation. He definitely didn't die in the home that was set ablaze.
It's so scary,when i saw thumbnail shivers went down my spine.Were lucky to live in 21st century but if we're commoners if we aren't commoners thenwho knows we might be the next target.Also i find this beheading thing disgusting sadly it's happening in my country to dogs people are crazy
Some of my family is buried at Westminster Abbey. A friend traveled there and brought me back a pebble as requested. Probably a bone of one of my ancestors. Greetings from Clan Johnston in the USA!
An old legend in Scotland is that James told Elizabeth under no circumstances could she execute his mother. But they worked out an elaborate ruse. Mary wore very high panets in the French fashion, basically tall platform shoes. Ceramic shoulders and a Ceramic head were made and she took off panets and wore slippers. A lamb neck was used for the slice area. A dead peasant woman was used for her body. The axeman almost blew it and chopped the back of the Ceramic head. Mary's ladies never allowed anyone to touch or inspect her body. They threw it quickly in a big box and threw the Ceramic head in with it. Mary was sent to her Son who kept her at an old nunnery near Edinburgh. She died 19 years later. It sounds like a stretch except families in Scotland have tales passed down from ancestors who interacted with her. And the Lord of Fotheringay had an exact Ceramic replica of Mary's head in his vault after his death. It can still be seen online.
Elizabeth's sign-off on Mary's death warrent set a precedent for the de jure execution of King Charles I, Mary's grandson. I think Elizabeth's regret was related to her fear that by ordering her cousin's death she put her own life in danger by 'regularizing' the execution of a monarch.
I'm descended from Mary Queen of Scots, somewhere or other, I found this vlog interesting, I can't believe the plotting against the Queen, usually Elizabeth 1st,that went on.
@Leitros-kj4qb Are you talking to me? 😂 I'm like the most die-hard fan of Mary. I know all of her life and family. I own a family tree of hers. This person is NOT descended from Mary, which is my point. 🤷🏼♂️
Princess Dianna was the descendant of Mary's grandsons Charles I illigitimate bastard child. So when Prince William sits on the throne the Jacobites will finally get their wish and have Stuart blood back on the throne.
I'm still lost as to why Elizabeth held her for almost two decades in prison. What was she supposed to have done? I understand her reasoning if she truly was involved in trying to kill the queen I understand. But what did she do to get on the Queen's bad side to begin with I don't understand?
Her prayer book she held before her death was auctioned off at christies not long ago,terrible,i wonder how they got it,notmuch left of her,she wanted to be buried with first husband in franch,it should of happened.
I've been studying Mary a lot and I doubt that she's been plotting. I also doubt that Elizabeth I really wanted to execute her. In those times, it was easy to play people against one another. But what I'm wondering about is how people can break into her tomb. What for? Leave the dead ones in peace.
@@valkyriesardo278 This is from someone's point of view for sure. A hungry person is only interested getting rid of hunger and nothing else matters so much. Dignity of corpse!?. That is something that I will have to think about.
I live a few miles from Fotheringhay - pronounced Fotherin-gay. Given the number of portraits showing Mary with a quite large konk, I cannot believe the death mask is her.
That's what I've always thought myself. She was an impulsive, passionate woman and that was her undoing, especially since Elizabeth the 1st was so cold blooded and clear minded.
Someone in authority should review the inarticulate narration of this complex story to clarify who is who and where is where, who and why...................narration does not correspond often with the script.
The ‘plot’ that Mary was supposedly involved in to replace Elizabeth may have been a ‘false flag’ operation to get rid of her. There have been various articles researched. Henery. Elizabeth’s father did this with his wife Ann Boleyn.
Inarticulate narration of a complex story! The narration does not correspond with the script, choppy bits here & there. If only Mary had rules with her HEAD & not with her HEART!!
It's all about politics, especially when you can be arrested, tortured and executed if you offended the wrong person. These things were fairly common among those in royal families and other high political positions. Life back then was brutal and religion played a large part in it all. That's a very important part of the reason the United States of America was created. Back then, in some countries you could be executed for being the wrong religion. Our founding fathers wanted to get away from all of that. And now the democrats are trying to infiltrate our churches. We simply cannot let them destroy our country.
@@ellencook1658 true but like he was raised by Elizabeth 1st and he knew Mary was his mother I heard he chose not to rescue her or something and let her die in order to be the king after Elizabeth death. Yeah he never knew her and it’s possible he wasn’t interested in knowing her but I wonder if he was at least curious about her
Bc James was left in Scotland as an infant by his mother so he never knew her, never saw her again. He was only 20 when she was beheaded. He wasn't risking both thrones on the woman who birthed him, probably had his father killed, probably made threats against QEI. With all of that, he didn't have the power so how would he save her? 🙄
I would imagine your collection would fill an entire room. But are the dolls original? Do you travel to different countries to collect them? Russia, France America, Sweden, Spain, Germany, and so on. It would be a rather expensive hobby, and the material would not be cheaply made. Do you trust online methods? Authenticity would be a must in something that is clearly historical. Anastasia would be a rare item to have in Russia, that is an original doll. Very pricey for most collectors. What exactly would be the Holy Grail of doll collecting? lol! Such collections must be nerve racking when children are around, and want to play with them. Might be a grand idea to put them in a locked room, with no key access for no one but yourself.
Excuse me, but in our country England we do not "sign off" on anything as that would be an American action. Please keep this in our native tongue English not American.
Mary made mistakes, yes. But she can't be blamed for Marie de Guise sending her to France to live and be engaged to Francis. Mary's primary mistakes were: * Trusting James, Earl of Moray. She should have banished him at the least, or put him to death, the first time he plotted against her throne. * Giving lands back to both the Protestants and Catholics who were against her. She instead, should have taken those lands and given them to those who actually were loyal to her, and she should have made sure they were part of her privy council! * She should not have married Darnley! Darnley's mother was dangerously ambitious and would have done anything to get her family, including sons, on a throne. * Rushing to Bothwell's side (four days nonstop on a horse) after he was injured in a skirmish. Then marrying him so soon after he was accused of plotting Darnley's murder. Not to mention, marrying him after he allegedly lured him to his castle and raped her. The law at the time would force Mary to marry him. People didn't believe he lured her or that he raped her. His affections for her were well known, as were hers for him. This led to more mistrust of Mary among Noblemen and everyday Scottish people alike. * Keeping David Rizzio as both an advisor and close companion to her reign. Not only were her husband and Rizzio found lying together in bed (not sexual, but it is believed they may have had relations) several times, but she had Rizzio in her bedchambers alone. That is unacceptable in today's standards, much less in times when women were the possession of their husbands. By Mary keeping him close, it led to jealousy on Darnley's side. Which led to Rizzio's murder. Not to mention, Scottish people were not trusting of foreigners, and David was Italian. This led to resentment by other Lords and those who made up the Privy Council. * Mary did not punish those who stormed the castle and helped in holding her prisoner. She did not punish those who murdered Rizzio. Lord Ruthven hated Mary. He was one of those involved in orchestrating her capture, and led the death campaign against David. She let him and the others involved, go, including Darley. She had valid legal reasons for putting Darnley to death, but she didn't. Mary sadly believed showing mercy would win her respect. It did not. *Not putting minister William Cecil to death. Most of the Lords in Scotland, especially James Earl of Moray, were in Cecil's pockets. He funded many of the coup attempts against Mary, and ultimately was the man who convinced Elizabeth to imprison Mary. Again, Mary believing kindness to the Protestants would earn her respect. *The same could be said for Reverend Knox (minus the convincing of Elizabeth to imprison Mary). He too had the Noblemen and Lords in his pockets, was behind many of the coups against Mary, and believed to have been involved in both Rizzio and Darnley's murders. She should have given him the death penalty, or banishment at the very least. Though Knox's reach and connections were far and long. Banishment would probably have done little to stop him. He was both a Protestant and Anti-Monarchist. His hatred for women was well documented, as was his hatred for female Monarchs. *Lastly, it could be argued that she should have converted to Protestantism. I personally believe she should have been able to practice the faith of her choice. But for political reasons, converting would have increased her chance of success. Mary was young, passionate, impulsive, and had quite a temper. However, she was sharp, loved by many, charming, and intelligent. She could have been the best queen of all time. Instead, she went down in history as the saddest fall from grace.
I believe plotting against the anointed Queen Elizabeth I made her not so innocent at all. There is plenty of legitimate evidence that she was plotting overthrowing her cousin. She was a handsome woman & a passionate monarch, but her passions overrode her intelligence, leaving no wisdom in her behavior.
Hi. Have you considered looking for remarkable history outside of Britain? You got off to a good start but I've noticed in the last year or so that your channel is starting to cannibalize itself by double and triple dipping on subject matter that is almost exclusively salacious or morbid. There's lots of girls out there that did stuff...is what I'm saying
This story was about girls or women, however one chooses to say it. Personally, I never tire of stories involving the history of the Kings and Queens of Europe. There are tv shows about Lizzie Borden and other "local" crime stories all the time. There's a lot more intrigue and historical mystery regarding European history. At least IMHO.
she should have been sent to Scotland, so Knox could have taken care of her body. Terrible Queen, bad judgement and no good politician. She was a complete failure and proved Knox right. That can not be said about Elizabeth I at all. She was clever.
Mary's first husband was strangled after a failed attempt to kill him via an explosion. Mary herself is something of a tragic figure who was an arrogant fool. Her actions in relation to Elizabeth deservedly brought about her own doom. I find her story a sad one, but ultimately I have little sympathy for her whereas I have come to feel much empathy for Mary I of England.
The second husband of Mary Queen of Scots was *not* blown up. C’mon: if you’re going to make this video then don’t be slapdash with your story telling.
I have always found Mary an interesting person. Thanks for sharing this.
Mary Queen of Scots is my 15th great grandmother.I'm 5'11" and so is my daughter as Mary was. I'm so glad her son James was made King. I'm angry what Queen Elizabeth allowed. She should have worried what heaven may have done with her soul for what she did to Mary.
Idk how true but I am a dependent of mary. My mother is a fatheringhey. We live in alaska
@@kathleenhamilton1308 also I’d Stuart ancestry. Do you have that Mary Stuart nose? My brother and one sister have a very similar nose and mouth to what you see in paintings.
I have never clicked a video so fast, i love your commentary
Well I'm sure if Elezabeth 1 had been in Mary's shoes she'd plotted against Mary...Mary had a life, it was stolen, as was her right to the throne I have all empathy for poor Mary she only wanted her life and freedom and child back RIP Queen Mary Stuart
a great blog on Queen Mary. Whilst i have always loved our great history, during lockdown, my son and i embarked on a voyage of discovery on my father scottish roots and found out some remarkable facts. It turns out my great grandfather x12 was Sir James Balfour of Pittendreich. He was reported to have been Mary Queen of Scots favorite Advisors but also had a hand in the assination of Queen Marys Husband Lord Darnley & very probably her downfall too. A bit of a scoundrel but rather bizarrely, he was so cunning and devious, he managed to survive that turbulent era and kept his head!
How very interesting! Perhaps you should write or commission a book on him? Especially as it’s Mary Queen of Scots, her life still captivates so many people. Much is written about royalty themselves but far less about those who brought them either support, rebellion or death.
I do envy you! My ancestors are all dull, poverty stricken peasants from Lancashire and Northumberland.
@@Drinadraws thank you Alexandra. It was quite a discovery seeing that my son and I were merely researching my father's biological father as he has remained - till now a mystery. You can only imagine my excitement finding out the Mary Queen link!!
Just wished i was able to tell my dad it all before he died 4 yrs ago. As it happens, he was born into very poor and humble farming household but joined the army at 17 where he then had a very distinguished 33 year army career rising to the rank of Regimental Sergeant Major. I am very proud of him
There is speculation if she was really involved in the plot. I've listened to a lot of lectures and they all have good points. Isn't history amazing? We will really never know
Elizabeth was a murderer
We don't even know the present.
thank you for sharing this 🥲
I read that Henry Lord Darnley appeared to have been strangled. It seems he and a servant escaped into the garden before the explosion. Marks of strangulation were found on both of their necks
Actually, no marks were found on his neck. They're positive he was murdered. They believe a pillow, however, was used to murder him via suffocation. He definitely didn't die in the home that was set ablaze.
How cruel.
Poor Queen Mary....😢
Her second husband was NOT blown up. He was strangled and placed in the garden before the house was blown up.
Very sad 😢
They sure knew how to have a good time, back then!😱😪
It's so scary,when i saw thumbnail shivers went down my spine.Were lucky to live in 21st century but if we're commoners if we aren't commoners thenwho knows we might be the next target.Also i find this beheading thing disgusting sadly it's happening in my country to dogs people are crazy
Her soul is in heaven with her beloved first husband...
Some of my family is buried at Westminster Abbey. A friend traveled there and brought me back a pebble as requested. Probably a bone of one of my ancestors. Greetings from Clan Johnston in the USA!
How would you have got a piece of bone updownstate?they wouldn't allow that,you couldn't open it anyway
I said he brought me a pebble.@@judis6224
An old legend in Scotland is that James told Elizabeth under no circumstances could she execute his mother. But they worked out an elaborate ruse. Mary wore very high panets in the French fashion, basically tall platform shoes. Ceramic shoulders and a Ceramic head were made and she took off panets and wore slippers. A lamb neck was used for the slice area.
A dead peasant woman was used for her body. The axeman almost blew it and chopped the back of the Ceramic head. Mary's ladies never allowed anyone to touch or inspect her body. They threw it quickly in a big box and threw the Ceramic head in with it. Mary was sent to her Son who kept her at an old nunnery near Edinburgh. She died 19 years later. It sounds like a stretch except families in Scotland have tales passed down from ancestors who interacted with her.
And the Lord of Fotheringay had an exact Ceramic replica of Mary's head in his vault after his death. It can still be seen online.
Elizabeth's sign-off on Mary's death warrent set a precedent for the de jure execution of King Charles I, Mary's grandson. I think Elizabeth's regret was related to her fear that by ordering her cousin's death she put her own life in danger by 'regularizing' the execution of a monarch.
" normalizing"
@@lynnbaker2336 Thank you......not.
I wish to point out that in my country England, we do not "sign off" on anything as that is an American term.
I'm descended from Mary Queen of Scots, somewhere or other, I found this vlog interesting, I can't believe the plotting against the Queen, usually Elizabeth 1st,that went on.
I've never met a person that said this, and actually gave proof of it.
Yes, She had only one child, James VI. So where do you come in?
@Leitros-kj4qb Are you talking to me? 😂 I'm like the most die-hard fan of Mary. I know all of her life and family. I own a family tree of hers. This person is NOT descended from Mary, which is my point. 🤷🏼♂️
@@noahbuck7550 Sorry, I was replying to the OP.
@@Leitros-kj4qb It's ok! I'm sorry if I was hostile! Lol. 😂
Love your content!
Interesting!😊
I have always found Mary’s story so epic and sad. I am a descendant of her bastard half-brother James Stuart, First Earl of Moray.
😮😮
Princess Dianna was the descendant of Mary's grandsons Charles I illigitimate bastard child. So when Prince William sits on the throne the Jacobites will finally get their wish and have Stuart blood back on the throne.
I am a descendent of Mary queen of Scots.
I would love to know how you are descended! I am a big genealogist.
@@vegetariansuniteworldwide8091 through her son king James. Other than that it is a long, long line to get from modern times back to Mary.
So am I
@@paulguise698 that is awesome ! Have you found anything stating that king James was illegitimate ?
@@terrivines4071 King James VI / I wasn't illegitimate.
One of her last letters is in The National Library of Scotland Edinburgh.
Queen Victoria called her “my ancestress”.
I dont understand why she had to be so disrespected in death
Actually. Mary’s second husband wasn’t killed by the explosion, he and his servant were found in the surrounding garden strangled to death
So they buried her heart and other organs elsewhere. What bizarre rituals they had
I'm still lost as to why Elizabeth held her for almost two decades in prison. What was she supposed to have done? I understand her reasoning if she truly was involved in trying to kill the queen I understand. But what did she do to get on the Queen's bad side to begin with I don't understand?
Her prayer book she held before her death was auctioned off at christies not long ago,terrible,i wonder how they got it,notmuch left of her,she wanted to be buried with first husband in franch,it should of happened.
My girlfriend is a descendant of Mary Queen of Scots 🎉🎉
Interesting how beaking into tombs was once a criminal offence, now it's called archeology, or science research 😁
Really not a very clever woman as it turns out. She didn’t deserve to be treated “the way she wanted to be”.
Not clever at all!
I've been studying Mary a lot and I doubt that she's been plotting. I also doubt that Elizabeth I really wanted to execute her. In those times, it was easy to play people against one another. But what I'm wondering about is how people can break into her tomb. What for? Leave the dead ones in peace.
Cromwell's body was taken out of grave and mutilated as I recall. Very common to do with the corpses of despised people at one time.
In the hope of finding something of value. A poor person can consider their next meal more important than the dignity of a corpse.
@@valkyriesardo278 This is from someone's point of view for sure. A hungry person is only interested getting rid of hunger and nothing else matters so much.
Dignity of corpse!?. That is something that I will have to think about.
I live a few miles from Fotheringhay - pronounced Fotherin-gay. Given the number of portraits showing Mary with a quite large konk, I cannot believe the death mask is her.
I’ve seen two death masks and they both look different
Too bad she ruled with her heart and not her head.
That's what I've always thought myself. She was an impulsive, passionate woman and that was her undoing, especially since Elizabeth the 1st was so cold blooded and clear minded.
This time in History is so interesting and at the same time so horrible that anyone could get executed for so very little reason.
Treason was the reason Mary was executed. That was hardly a small matter.
she asked for it.
Requiescat en Pace Marie.❤
Someone in authority should review the inarticulate narration of this complex story to clarify who is who and where is where, who and why...................narration does not correspond often with the script.
The ‘plot’ that Mary was supposedly involved in to replace Elizabeth may have been a ‘false flag’ operation to get rid of her. There have been various articles researched. Henery. Elizabeth’s father did this with his wife Ann Boleyn.
Inarticulate narration of a complex story! The narration does not correspond with the script, choppy bits here & there. If only Mary had rules with her HEAD & not with her HEART!!
Sucked and kinda messed up her own child didn’t save her.
It's all about politics, especially when you can be arrested, tortured and executed if you offended the wrong person. These things were fairly common among those in royal families and other high political positions. Life back then was brutal and religion played a large part in it all. That's a very important part of the reason the United States of America was created. Back then, in some countries you could be executed for being the wrong religion. Our founding fathers wanted to get away from all of that. And now the democrats are trying to infiltrate our churches. We simply cannot let them destroy our country.
Like Mary, he was a child when he became king of Scotland.
How would he have accomplished that? She was unwelcome in Scotland after she fled, and he was an infant when she left.
@@ellencook1658 true but like he was raised by Elizabeth 1st and he knew Mary was his mother I heard he chose not to rescue her or something and let her die in order to be the king after Elizabeth death. Yeah he never knew her and it’s possible he wasn’t interested in knowing her but I wonder if he was at least curious about her
Bc James was left in Scotland as an infant by his mother so he never knew her, never saw her again. He was only 20 when she was beheaded. He wasn't risking both thrones on the woman who birthed him, probably had his father killed, probably made threats against QEI. With all of that, he didn't have the power so how would he save her? 🙄
I have a 22 inch Doll of her. It' so beautiful. I collect dolls that are from History
I would imagine your collection would fill an entire room. But
are the dolls original? Do you travel to different countries to
collect them? Russia, France America, Sweden, Spain,
Germany, and so on. It would be a rather expensive hobby,
and the material would not be cheaply made. Do you trust
online methods? Authenticity would be a must in something
that is clearly historical. Anastasia would be a rare item to
have in Russia, that is an original doll. Very pricey for most
collectors. What exactly would be the Holy Grail of doll
collecting? lol! Such collections must be nerve racking when
children are around, and want to play with them. Might be a
grand idea to put them in a locked room, with no key access
for no one but yourself.
Funny how your videos always seem to come out after History Callings do.
I bet they wore out a lot of axes during the Tudor period.
Excuse me, but in our country England we do not "sign off" on anything as that would be an American action. Please keep this in our native tongue English not American.
Mary Queen of Scotch sounds like a good brand of booze.
Her actual title was Mary Queen of Scotts.
She was a good quenn in France but didnt know how to be queen of Scotland
Kayervi 6298,you don't know this for sure,if people just left her alone.
Mary made mistakes, yes. But she can't be blamed for Marie de Guise sending her to France to live and be engaged to Francis.
Mary's primary mistakes were:
* Trusting James, Earl of Moray. She should have banished him at the least, or put him to death, the first time he plotted against her throne.
* Giving lands back to both the Protestants and Catholics who were against her. She instead, should have taken those lands and given them to those who actually were loyal to her, and she should have made sure they were part of her privy council!
* She should not have married Darnley! Darnley's mother was dangerously ambitious and would have done anything to get her family, including sons, on a throne.
* Rushing to Bothwell's side (four days nonstop on a horse) after he was injured in a skirmish. Then marrying him so soon after he was accused of plotting Darnley's murder. Not to mention, marrying him after he allegedly lured him to his castle and raped her. The law at the time would force Mary to marry him. People didn't believe he lured her or that he raped her. His affections for her were well known, as were hers for him. This led to more mistrust of Mary among Noblemen and everyday Scottish people alike.
* Keeping David Rizzio as both an advisor and close companion to her reign. Not only were her husband and Rizzio found lying together in bed (not sexual, but it is believed they may have had relations) several times, but she had Rizzio in her bedchambers alone. That is unacceptable in today's standards, much less in times when women were the possession of their husbands.
By Mary keeping him close, it led to jealousy on Darnley's side. Which led to Rizzio's murder. Not to mention, Scottish people were not trusting of foreigners, and David was Italian. This led to resentment by other Lords and those who made up the Privy Council.
* Mary did not punish those who stormed the castle and helped in holding her prisoner. She did not punish those who murdered Rizzio. Lord Ruthven hated Mary. He was one of those involved in orchestrating her capture, and led the death campaign against David. She let him and the others involved, go, including Darley. She had valid legal reasons for putting Darnley to death, but she didn't. Mary sadly believed showing mercy would win her respect. It did not.
*Not putting minister William Cecil to death. Most of the Lords in Scotland, especially James Earl of Moray, were in Cecil's pockets. He funded many of the coup attempts against Mary, and ultimately was the man who convinced Elizabeth to imprison Mary. Again, Mary believing kindness to the Protestants would earn her respect.
*The same could be said for Reverend Knox (minus the convincing of Elizabeth to imprison Mary). He too had the Noblemen and Lords in his pockets, was behind many of the coups against Mary, and believed to have been involved in both Rizzio and Darnley's murders. She should have given him the death penalty, or banishment at the very least. Though Knox's reach and connections were far and long. Banishment would probably have done little to stop him. He was both a Protestant and Anti-Monarchist. His hatred for women was well documented, as was his hatred for female Monarchs.
*Lastly, it could be argued that she should have converted to Protestantism. I personally believe she should have been able to practice the faith of her choice. But for political reasons, converting would have increased her chance of success.
Mary was young, passionate, impulsive, and had quite a temper. However, she was sharp, loved by many, charming, and intelligent. She could have been the best queen of all time. Instead, she went down in history as the saddest fall from grace.
55 seconds in and so much inaccuracy.
Unfortunately i hope Gloriana didn’t make it into heaven
She signed off on the execution of her own cousin, She took an innocent life
I believe plotting against the anointed Queen Elizabeth I made her not so innocent at all. There is plenty of legitimate evidence that she was plotting overthrowing her cousin. She was a handsome woman & a passionate monarch, but her passions overrode her intelligence, leaving no wisdom in her behavior.
Baloney!
Im decended from mary queen of scots.
You all should have a family reunion.
@Prfdt3 not sure how to take that,do you mean her living relatives?had comments that were untrue about her,so natural to be skeptical.
MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS, ORA PRO NOBIS
Hi. Have you considered looking for remarkable history outside of Britain? You got off to a good start but I've noticed in the last year or so that your channel is starting to cannibalize itself by double and triple dipping on subject matter that is almost exclusively salacious or morbid.
There's lots of girls out there that did stuff...is what I'm saying
Like Lizzie Borden for example, she definitely has remarkable history
@@A_Borden_History 😝 Scott free as well.
This story was about girls or women, however one chooses to say it. Personally, I never tire of stories involving the history of the Kings and Queens of Europe. There are tv shows about Lizzie Borden and other "local" crime stories all the time. There's a lot more intrigue and historical mystery regarding European history. At least IMHO.
I meant to say that your comment about girls that did stuff sounded a little, uh, unusual. Just saying. 😄
The firm ! Backstabbing bunch 😅
*+BEATA MARIA REGINA, ORA PRO NOBIS*
she should have been sent to Scotland, so Knox could have taken care of her body. Terrible Queen, bad judgement and no good politician. She was a complete failure and proved Knox right. That can not be said about Elizabeth I at all. She was clever.
🌹🌹🌹🌹🌷🌷🇬🇧
Mary's first husband was strangled after a failed attempt to kill him via an explosion. Mary herself is something of a tragic figure who was an arrogant fool. Her actions in relation to Elizabeth deservedly brought about her own doom. I find her story a sad one, but ultimately I have little sympathy for her whereas I have come to feel much empathy for Mary I of England.
Sounds abut like Rasputin’s demise.
No, her 1st husband was Dauphine of France and died of illness. Her 2nd husband was murdered (explosion but more likely strangled).
Thank you for saying this! MQS thought with her nether regions and was a terrible politician.
Yes, Mary's life was very tragic.
The second husband of Mary Queen of Scots was *not* blown up. C’mon: if you’re going to make this video then don’t be slapdash with your story telling.
My understanding is that Mary queen of scots was beheaded by swordsman that was specifically brought in from france to do the deed and not an ax.
Anne Boleyn.
No. That was Anne Bolen. Mary was hacked with an Ax.
Henry VIII imported a French swordsman for Anne Bolyen's execution.
@@KattS1th Thanks for the correction.