Kayaking Over a Waterfall | Science of Stupid: Ridiculous Fails
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 08. 2024
- The mere thought of kayaking over a waterfall would horrify many, but there is an art and a science to such a dangerous feat.
➡ Subscribe: bit.ly/NatGeoSu...
➡ Watch all clips of Science of Stupid here: bit.ly/WatchSc...
➡ Get more Science of Stupid: on.natgeo.com/...
About Science of Stupid:
Science of Stupid shows the world's funniest fail clips and uses science to examine them.
Watch the Full New Season of Science of Stupid: Ridiculous Fails for Free on the National Geographic site & app: www.nationalge...
About National Geographic:
National Geographic is the world's premium destination for science, exploration, and adventure. Through their world-class scientists, photographers, journalists, and filmmakers, Nat Geo gets you closer to the stories that matter and past the edge of what's possible.
Get More National Geographic:
Official Site: bit.ly/NatGeoOf...
Facebook: bit.ly/FBNatGeo
Twitter: bit.ly/NatGeoTw...
Instagram: bit.ly/NatGeoInsta
Kayaking Over a Waterfall | Science of Stupid: Ridiculous Fails
• Kayaking Over a Waterf...
National Geographic
/ natgeo
There is an art and a science to kayaking over a waterfall. What's one thing you learned from this video?
That the makers totally discount the fun of kayaking and don't really have a clue why someone would do any kayaking, or really anything fun.
@@Slawlerco I'd like to kindly disagree with that
That NatGeo has a show called "Science of Stupid"
That National Geographic does not do their research before putting out a webseries. So much great science here, and you ignore ALL of it in favor of preconceived misconceptions. Very disappointed.
I learned that national geographic does not do very much research at all into the sports or activities before basically calling its participants stupid. I get that the host was trying to be funny, but there was no mention of rolling a kayak or that the kayaker could pull their spraydeck and wet exit the boat. They didn't focus on skill at all (They probably thought they did, but they did not.) or what you can do while running the drop to correct for angle. Why did they not mention any of these things? They didn't take the time or have the desire to learn. Very poorly done. What else have you aired that had this poor level of research? I am disappointed because I did not expect such poor quality from Nat Geo. Now, I have way less respect for the channel.
Please research how kayakers actually approach dropping falls before making sweeping (and wrong) statements. This is insulting (to Tyler and his team), inaccurate in presenting both the risks and the mitigation of said risks (techniques, technology etc.) and no mention of the years of training that went into this particular run. Disappointing that National Geographic would associate its brand with this rubbish. As stated elsewhere, go watch "Chasing Niagra" for a better perspective on running big waterfalls.
100% agreed
Couldn’t agree more. When “science” turns to opinion.
The only thing stupid is this video. So many things to say here, but that was a standard T-rescue at the end and it is done all the time. He didn't save his life, as the kayaker could have simply swam out of his boat or hand rolled up. T-rescue is simply easier. Don't call something stupid when you don't understand what you're watching or is technical elements and standard practices.
Why does such a small detail of this video make you so angry? He never called the kayaker stupid and it's pretty obvious he was making a joke.
@@zachwolverton2149 Because it's not one small detail, it's every single point he's trying to make in the video, even down to the "science."
She chose to expound upon one small point, the standard T-rescue and the wet exit, because it's literally the 3rd and 1st thing, respectively, that you learn when you get into a whitewater kayak -- just showing the extent of their blatant ignorance. Sure, the quip about the "ignoring the guy who saves your life" is a joke, but the misconceptions surrounding the joke are presented like fact. And people expect facts from National Geographic, even on series as lighthearted as "Science of Stupid."
In a show called "Science of Stupid," you'd expect some science, and not just all stupid, right?
Wow. This was shockingly disappointing. It's extremely clear that you did ZERO research before reporting on this.
If you want real reporting on waterfall descents, watch the documentary "Chasing Niagara." That's well done by people who actually know this subject.
Yea...maybe you guys should have talked to kayakers who run waterfalls before putting this video out.
This video shows a poor understanding of waterfall running. I bet it only took a 5 min google to write it.
nah they would have learned more from google
On waterfalls under 30 ft, you wanna land flat, it’s a move called a boof, waterfalls higher than 30 you wanna land at a 90 degree angle.
Depends. Sometimes even a 10m boof can be painful if the water you’re landing on is what we call ‘hard’. Some waterfalls, like the Nosebreaker, also aren’t really easy to boof.
A flat landing in green water is usually not a good idea. One thing this "science" failed to mention is that aerated water has much less resistance, acting as a cushion.
The kayakers know a lot more about falling water than the clown doing the writing here.
Bobby Miller intentionally DID NOT try to pencil in the drop @2:45. The falls he ran, have a very shallow pool for the landing. To make that drop, you must land shallow. Trying to make the drop near 90° of angle would result in a severe "piton" with the bow if the boat striking the rocky bottom of the pool.
Were any actual whitewater/ falls running kayakers consulted on this? Because it really doesn't seem like it. So disappointing.
I like how they jumbled a bunch of clips together and called it training. National Geographic, If you want an actual science behind running falls I know a guy. He is actually hanging off the side of the falls as Tyler makes his run. Do better research into your articles please.
Wow. I agree with other commenters, the only thing stupid here is this video. Besides the blatant bias and judgement presented here, it is painfully obvious that no one on the production team even tried to research this topic. There's plenty of books, instructional videos, and - the real shocker - actual real live kayakers to talk to who paddle waterfalls on a regular basis. I would expect better from National Geographic.
Everyone is first until they refresh the comments section 😂
And realize they ain’t first 😅
@@BestOfAnimalss yeah
You realize that you are first until you come to comment section 😄😄😄
furst
- "32 feet per second per second". * * commence metricMasterrace rant * *
- 2:37 "hitting H2O at a terrible angle". Common, how hard is it to say "water"
wow, such sience
@Rebecca Leeman harder than you'd think
@Rebecca Leeman one can dream
New world record this was a record like 5 years ago
more than 11 years ago, Bradt did it in early 2009
@@YRDSL_ goes to show how behind they are. That's when I saw it so my bad.
Science of Stupid in *ENGLISH* also ? Wow !
@@muznahashmi9450 done
*To the early squad*
"assemble"
👇
You can have a picnic without sandwiches.
I would expect this kind of ignorance from a brand like Ladbible but from National Geographic? what a poor representation of the sport of kayaking.
I thought the earth was all flat...
I love Science of Stupid series!!
Unfortunately, No one loves you😅
Anyone from india who was expecting that annoying host ?
I just realised how rubbiah that guy speaks
Sri lanka!
3:39
Wonderful
Thanks for the information 👍
We're glad you enjoyed the video! Stay curious.
No, this was all bad information. Perhaps try "Chasing Niagara" to actually learn something about running waterfalls.
15-20 feet... no problem. Super fun. Love it. 180+ feet... nope. Nopety-nope-nope.
@1:10 Please use SI UNITS🙏🏾
Daredevil's 😱
Embarrassing. You didn't think about this at all. Its like you didn't even consider the water going over the fall had been studied by science and that it would effect the kayak.
Do more research. Way of base
I am holding the world record to run at the fastest speed with my body, anyone wanna beat my record?
I am holding at least more than hundred such record.
Hand me your body
2:43 - the deaths in many airplane and helicopter crashes is the tearing of internal organs rupturing blood vessels due to the G force. Same could happen here if you don't manage your G force on entry.
How to land safely when it do go down.
Random Fact:
There is enough DNA in your body to stretch it from Sun to Pluto and back - 17 times!
-RealFacts
Absolutely mad! This guy is good. 👍👏
Congratulation!!
Greeting from Nepal !!
🇳🇵Hail Nepal !!!
Nice video
Daring.....👍
cool..👍
Hmmm
national geographic is not a good source for info. this entire video is a bad example of how boaters go over water falls.
Nice
🌱🌱🇮🇳🌱🌱
Love This!
👍👍👍👏👏👏
Wow it's some stupid units..... Plz use SI units.
disrespectful
I learnt a lot from nat geo, thanks for giving us free education,
You didn't learn anything correct from this clip. Perhaps try "Chasing Niagara," a documentary about waterfall running. That one was produced by people who actually know what they're talking about.
Todays fun fact: The scientific term for brain freeze is “sphenopalatine ganglioneuralgia”
Btw at 40k ill do anpther vid, so sub if u want to :)
Hello
👍👍
Any Stan.Just Keepp Safe...
yes, this video is ridiculous.
ANANTHU
Frist comment 😎😎😎🔥
From india ❤️
In lack of wits, y not.
Good video nice 👍👌
Good luck L
❤️🖤❤️🖤
🐻 Lokah Samastah Sukhino Bhavanthu 🌿
🐻 Sabbe Satta Bhavanthu Sukhitatta 🌿🌿
🐻 May all Beings be Happy 💕💕💗❤️💞 പ്പെട്ടത് 🌏🌍🌎 റ്റഗ്ഗംഡ്യൂഗ്ഗം 🐻 🌱🍇🌱🥑🌱🍊🌱🍎 Be Vegan 🌱🥥🌱 റ്റഗ്ഗംഡ്യൂ 🐻
The most dangerous stunt you have ever seen
I have seen more than it
Jumping from space with the speed of 843.6 mph
FELIX BAUMGARTNER
▶➡ National Geographic, You are the best, love you for ever. 😍
Instead of him talking it would be nice to hear interviews from them. In your cartoon was not entirely correct as you go over a waterfall you do not lean forward lean as far back as you can! Bear animation
nope, you lean forwards
You absolutely lean forwards on entry and on most waterfalls you lean forwards ate the crest too, but their animation was still false. If you want to plug it you angle your boat straight down quite early and just keep her steady till the end. Not the way they showed it, which was a dude gradually tipping forward the whole length of the fall...
@@twanlange2827 yes, I am very aware. You still lean forwards though whether the animation was right or wrong.
national geo, still cornering the market in stupid takes