Is The Gaming Industry OVER??
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 08. 2023
- Watch The Full Podcast here:
• THE FUTURE SUCKS | Tra...
Support The Podcast On Patreon!
/ trashtaste
Follow Trash Taste:
/ trashtastepod
/ trashtaste
Trash Taste Boiis:
Joey | / thean1meman
Connor | / cdawgva
Garnt | / gigguk
Follow Us On Twitter:
Joey | / thean1meman
Connor | / cdawgva
Garnt | / giggukaz
Edited By:
/ mudantv
/ mudantv
It says a LOT about the game industry when Baldur's gate 3 released in a polished state and an absolute masterpiece of a game and the first response was "don't expect this. It's too good. We won't be doing that"
Tbf, the first people who said that were indie guys, not AAA devs. Secondly, the executives and producers wouldn't give any game five years of development, barring maybe Nintendo and even then they still push Pokémon projects down the pipeline like they just chugged a whole bottle of milk of magnesia.
@@fluidthought42
The problem is that
1. It is most modern company’s choice to have ridiculously short dev cycles. It’s very much a shortsighted model that prioritizes lower profits than could be achieved with a good product, but with the benefit of min maxing effort vs money that is a “sure thing” based on install base who will buy no matter what
2. Companies MANY times larger than the team that made Baldurs gate could have made a game with the same level of polish even with a restricted dev cycle. They literally have the manpower to release a game that good in a fraction of the time. They just don’t want to.
3. In general, AAA devs have the complete ability to make exactly the kind of game they want to make. It’s just because of this “live service” copium train that most studios have nowadays that they don’t put the effort in. Like I said, it’s this very shortsighted model of “fast cash” with pump-and -dump titles. And it doesn’t really matter what state the game ends up in if it launches badly. Player engagement plummets within weeks of release.
4. It takes NOTHING to be happy when another company in your industry scores a W. If you, as a dev, have your first reaction to a company releasing a great game be “oh no. Uhhh, stop expecting that, we don’t make good games like that anymore, it’s unrealistic” then you’ve got serious problems. The gaming industry SHOULD be one where everyone’s successes are celebrated, and where companies rejoice in making critically acclaimed pro-consumer products.
It did sit in EA for a long time though, I've waited for it for 2 years since I bought it. Was it worth the wait? Hell yeah.
@@fluidthought42 Firstly, it's not a problem when indie developers say that, but it is when the AAA devs do. No one expects BG3 level of development from indie devs (ok there are always some people that do, but you get what I'm saying). Secondly, 5+ years of developement for a game that sucks is not a rarity (diablo 4 for example).
@@KuroiAllen
The guy's tweet highlighted in the IGN video was an indie dev
The way I see it people do applaud the DEVS when a game does a comeback after fixing glitches and adding missing content. The thing is, it's always the leadership that decides release dates, not the devs, so people do understand that devs are not at fault here most of the times, specially when the game clearly shows signs that devs care even if it's unfinished. People do give props to devs, not to the company itself
Then why threaten devs instead of the higher-ups?
@@pingpong5877Because they are the public faces, people never complain to investors
@@pingpong5877 because some people can also be short sighted for these things
Like Dmc5
@@chill7056DMC5 seemed good to me, was it iffy on release?
The biggest problem with gaming right now in my opinion is that major video game companies only care about profits and the bottom line, even if it's to the determent of the games they release and their reputation. That's why games like Elden Ring and Tears of the Kingdom were such a big deal because it showed people that there are still AAA video game companies out there that give a shit.
And Elden Ring was still just a shitty Dark Souls 4. 😬
@@Slays_Media hot take: Elden Ring is much better than totk
@@moustachio05 that's not a hot take, that's just facts
"The biggest problem with gaming right now in my opinion is that major video game companies only care about profits and the bottom line, even if it's to the determent of the games they release and their reputation."
That's the problem with everything nowadays. Greedy ass corporations and rich people
And Baldur's Gate 3
The real problem Connor has with games that he has yet to realise is skipping cutscenes and not understanding the story does not equal bad game, you’re impatient.
He... Never calls them bad, he says he doesnt enjoy them, but he (iirc) never outright calls them bad games, best he just takes a jab at how much time they force people to read between gameplay loops
1. He doesn't call games with story bad he just prefers games to be games not a full on book/TV series.
2. He's very open minded, he's been playing games like Final Fantasy and reading dialogue and when he does skip it's fair enough cuz' some of the dialogue drags, plus he states that he's looking forward to playing another.
Making up shit is not an argument
That's because cutscenes are boring most of the time
I do the same, despite that while watching Baldurs gate gameplay not once did I skip a cutscene, it actually felt exciting
Connor has the best take about the situation, playing single player games and ignoring what's coming out has saved my outlook on gaming.
Man was cookin and then he immediately followed up with a “I hate all dlc”
@@davegonzales8269yea that kinda pissed me off a bit lol, especially with the fact that he was talking about Elden ring dlc. Fromsoft dlc is genuinely some of the most polished and amazing content you can have in a souls game, every dlc they release is always a straight banger, but I guess since he’s had bad experiences with dlc, he probably doesn’t want to take the chance with the Elden ring dlc, which is pretty sad.
If your main console is the Switch then you have been eating good for ages now.
It's only PC, PS5 and Xbox "whatever the fuck the name is" the ones that have been suffering recently, the pursuit for next gen graphics have been hitting them hard.
@@imatiu pc can emulate switch at 4k60 and have a huge back catalog of old games + emulation. If you are struggling to find good games, thats on you really. (not you but modern gamers)
In the past two years, the strikes by IATSE, WGA, and SAG have revealed a simple yet alarming fact: the entertainment industry is in the midst of an existential crisis. It may be for different reasons, but this crisis extends to the games industry, mirroring the conditions in TV and film, where employees often face relatively meager pay and excessive overwork.
If you look into the history of some of your favorite studios, you'll find that many of the creators behind beloved games have worked to the point of serious mental and physical exhaustion or basically checked out after a 10 to 20-year shelf life in the industry mostly driven by a culture of crunch. Crunch conditions can lead to both good and bad games, but the truth is that such an environment is invariably unsustainable, harming both the creators and the overall quality of the industry.
And this crunch culture has only worsened as game budgets have expanded and projects have grown in scope which means the games industry now finds itself in an untenable position, and the result is a proliferation of rushed, flawed products like CyberPunk and Anthem. Unfortunately, the situation isn't as clear-cut as the adage suggests: "A delayed game is eventually good, but a rushed game is forever bad."
Among game developers and artists, there's a saying that a work of art is never finished, merely abandoned, which speaks to a persistent issue where the opportunity for continuous improvement leads to a harsh reality. More time spent on a project doesn't necessarily mean better quality; it often means more crunch. That pressure, in turn, drives experienced developers away from AAA or the industry as a whole. Those studios then have to find replacements in junior or generally less experienced developers, which leads to more crunch to compensate, until the process repeats itself into a cycle of attrition within the industry.
Makes me mad when most people on the internet are just trashing strikes, claiming those people are just lazy and stupid
You made a book everyone already knows this
@@harleygravisThe comment section are literally contradictory to his statement, more dev tiem and delay don't equal more polish, it means more crunch. There needs to be a Strike in protest for the game industry to have this happend, sadly there won't be.
@@harleygravisThe whole comment section praising BG3 is doing the opposite funnily enough.
This is why i love xenoblade games.
Each DLC is basically its own game with its own mechanics so youre essentially getting a new title.
FR. Monolith Soft went above and beyond with Xenoblade Chronicles. Those Expansion Pass DLCs like Torna and Future Redeemed made my standards with DLCs so high.
All that, plus Monolith having limited crunch issues as of me writing this, allegedly.
Xenoblade 3 dlc was insane
The problem about Gant’s statement about expectations is that the company’s give the audience the expectations of their games. I’m gonna be pissed when u underdeliver
In Todd “the God” Howard’s own words. “16x the details!” 😅
*Cough* Peter Molyneux *Cough*
Early access is not always bad, just recenty, dave the diver and balders gate 3 came out to fantastic reviews, both being in early access for ages. Balder gate 3 was in early access for 3 years. Often it can cause issues, but sometimes its necessary to help build bigger games that cant be done in one go without some feedback and cashflow.
Devs will stop putting out pre-order garbage, unpatched and untested shovelware, and overpriced fixes labeled as DLC when people stop paying for them.
Yep. Unfortunately there’s just a lot of dumb people out there who keep throwing money at them.
devs arent the ones making those decisions. its the executives. get it right before you complain.
The sooner you stop blaming this on the workers the better.
just make a law to made then illegal dang it
Baldur’s Gate 3 just came out proving that AAA games CAN have the level of quality and polish that we expect of them. Elden Ring and Tears of the Kingdom are also great examples of AAA games that prove that expecting games to release in a complete state. The expectations placed on cyberpunk were not too high, CDPR just completely dropped the ball. There is no need for the consumer to be patient with publishers when we’re shown the standard that they should be held to. Release finished games, that’s it.
As far as DLC goes, it’s my opinion that’s it’s generally always good. Then again, I think back to the old Bethesda/Obsidian when I think of what DLC/expansions should be. Fallout: New Vegas, Oblivion, and Skyrim are examples of good DLC in my opinion (minus the horse armor).
Early access is a mixed bag. Larian Studios has proven with Divinity Original Sin 2 and Baldur’s Gate 3 that their model works flawlessly. Hades was also early access for a long time and was better for it. It can be done well, but we’ve also seen the many examples of it being done so poorly.
BG3/Larian is Indie not AAA.
@@MJS-lk2ej I’d beg to differ, they have 401 employees which makes them a large studio.
@@Moodbone studio size is irrelevant, small teams can make great games. Indie is an abbreviation of independent, meaning a self publishing development studio, as opposed to a studio with a publisher which is a AAA studio.
@@MJS-lk2ej They became triple A once they got 400 employees.
I agree that people arent patient. But the reason cyberpunk got so much flak is because of CDPR's hubris, they decided to release a statement that they will release cyberpunk when its ready because they focus on quality, which gave fans a false sense of security that it will release as such. It wasnt a lack of patience, it was a breach of trust
Fromsoftware is the only developer that I trust with games and DLCs, especially DLC
True! Old Hunters and Ringed City made Bloodborne and DS3 an 11/10.
Except Scholar Of The First Sin, where they made the original Dark Souls 2 worse
Garnt is part of the problem. 😔
69 likes 🌶️
Yes. Yes, he is.
@@Y7D😊
What "part of the problem"? He literally said he played the game a year later (7:00) when the patches had rolled out and he had a great overall experience. The problem is consumers pre-ordering and hyping the game up as if it was the second coming of christ enabling this greedy executives to release unfinished games. I ain't even gonna mention some doofuses going to twitter and harassing devs when the games are delayed/doesn't have release dates(God of War dev got harassed due to delay announcement.)
I'm the mindset of "patient gaming" where I play the games a year or so later, where the bugs are fixed, it's on a discount, and the hype of the game has disappeared so I can form my own opinion of the game. There's no "problem", only idiots who spend their money without being diligent consumers. Watch game reviews ffs.
@@fabiodlxgacha games
Connor's take about not wanting DLC and wanting a sequel is quite funny to me, some dlc's were adapted into sequels for growing in scope (for better or worse) saints row 4 was meant to just be dlc for 3, assassins creed mirage was meant too be an expansion to valhalla, and left for dead 2 was just meant to be an update too the first game, some of these are controversial though, with l4d2's announcement some thought it was a cash grab since the first game came out only a year ago, and the updated content was just a few new guns and maps and thats it
For early access games, there's high profile failures and wins, Deep Rock Galactic is the only live service game I enjoy and I've been a fan of it when i bought it in early access in 2018 and its ironically dwarfing other live service games playercount, with steams bf 2042 and halo infinite not being able to pass DRG's player numbers.
Baldur's gate 3 which is one of the biggest successes this year was also in early access since 2019 (correct me if wrong) and is out performing triple A releases with an indie team behind it, but I get their opinion about early access games cause there are just too many that are just abandon ware that's shovelled onto steam just too make a quick buck and run
heheh, dwarfing
I love creating fictional worlds so. I HATE when companies like Blizzard make original concepts, then care for making money over expanding the world
What are these titles bro?! This year's games have been popping off and we're soon gonna get more bangers later on
The tripple A portion is probably shaking in their boots, but with the success of Baulders Gate and Battlebit shows that good games can and will make their money. Hopefully more devs take notes, or we just stop giving these corporations top dollar for sub-par products. It starts with us. Speak with your money, people ;)
Except AAA games still make so much more money than battlebit and baldur's gate 3. Dialbo 4 just reported $666 million within five days of launch, partly because of predatory monetization and microtransactions. Battlebit and BG3 are absolutely successes, don't get me wrong, but AAA games studios(specifically their shareholders) aren't going to be worried because they still print money. Larian, the developers of Baldur's Gate 3, were happy to report 2.5 million sales throughout their 3 years of early access. at 60 USD a pop that's $150,000,000 gross. So Blizzard made in 4.5~times the money in five days than larian did in 3 years. And this is after Blizzard had a metric fuckton of sexual assault scandals, a massive PR backlash about cancelling promised features in overwatch, and generally being a shitty company for decades at this point.
So yeah, unfortunately, AAA studios aren't shaking in their boots. Hell, if they fuck up bad enough, they'll just get bought by Microsoft. *coughBethesdaFallout76cough*
Boulders Gate sucks 🤬🤬
@@silverwolfe3636 While I agree to an extent, you're not considering the size of these teams that work on them. Baldur's gate has around 400 devs, and Battlebit sits at that ultra impressive 3.
Diablo 4, on the other hand, had over 9000 people working on it. I'd imagine they were banking on people playing for years to come while continuing to micro-purchase along the way.
This is evident with how many changes D4 has made recently that serve no other clear purpose outside keeping you on longer, and playing every "new" update with a BP. They clearly need more players to pay for more nonsense, it's written all over the walls.
@@harleygravissays the person thats sucking off these corporations and defending them in the comment section
And voting too
lmao, this year is literally one of the best years for single player games ever. But I guess if you only play gacha games and random multiplayer games, it's kinda shit
dang true Hi-Fi Rush still my personal GOTY
Any year is best for me since what get my interest are a lot, especially older games
6:56 Gotta disagree this ; CDPR promised features such as; Branching life paths, better character customization, gang activity, police chases and or persuasion, car customization, NPC daily routines, running on last gen consoles, diverse street vendors, drivable flying cars, multiple apartments/home, the list goes on. This was content that CDPR themselves put in trailers, demos, interviews, and such. And if they know they can’t deliver or time restrictions will exist, they shouldn’t be putting out an ad that they know they can’t fill. CDPR SET the expectations and they fucked it, not the internet.
Funny how you mention all that AND run on last consoles.
Dont you think that would have been a fantasy anyways?
You'd be surprised what gets cut from your favourite games, just because they showed some of it (with IN DEVELOPMENT above it) doesn't mean that's final.
The final product we got (pc at least) was absolutely worth the money IMO.
@@ganondorf66no I don't think what OP said is a fantasy considering other games do equal or better than Cyberpunk 2077. And yes it's still a false advertisement for over promising stuff that they couldn't do on a tight schedule. Well some respect for CDPR at least fixing the game and allowing modders in their game for free.
@@IR-Fan equal or better? I disagree.
@@ganondorf66 why is that?
@@IR-Fan the writing, story, details, very few if any games get close.
It’s funny how this is posted after Baldurs Gate 3 comes out.
Also 2023 has been one of the best years in recent memory for games. There's still the BS that happens but that's just gonna be around forever unfortunately. Every month this year has had a major release that's been a slam dunk, few misses but people exaggerate them to highs as if it's the end of the world. (Gollum and Redfall sucked I get it, shut up)
Also DLC wise, my mindset is if I was able to have an enjoyable experience with the base game and that DLC is actually something substantial (like most FromSoft dlc or the SF6 characters coming out) then I'm ok paying a bit more for extra content. Battle passes can fuck off though.
Yeah but as we all know that's a rarity of a game these days
Meanwhile this year had FFXVI, Hi-Fi-Rush, RE4 and Dead Space Remake, Pikmin 4, Pizza Tower (indie but still), Street Fighter 6 and a small lil title called Zelda.@@Teraplexor1 oh and more to come this year thankfully.
Battlebit goated
@@Teraplexor1 AAA can be hit or miss definitely, that's why it's best to expand your horizons and move outta your comfort zone. Also nah on that second part, weight of some of those titles I mentioned won't get you thinking about the bad games lol.
@@KillianC1C2yeah you would think people would have jumped to indie games by this point but all I hear is people bitching about and continuing to give their money to big companies for incomplete AAA games. Like bruh, pick up Celeste or Cult of the Lamb or something sheesh.
Persona is such a hard case cause on one hand I have to pay full price for another version with more content but it's not necessary DLC because it changes how the game plays to it's core. On the other hand I'm like Joey and Atlas can take my money because P3 Reload is coming out next year lol.
I'll just wait for Persona 3 Reload + R 😂
Fucking same
I always find it amusing when people say, "is the gaming industry in trouble?" or that some notable comapines (EA, Acti-Blizzard), or a couple of bad releasees (or more recent bad PC releases) has people say, "Tripple A games are a joke." "The game indsutry is a joke."
Meanwhile I've been enjoying Tears of the Kingdom, I loved Elden Ring and every Souls game, my favorite game of recent memory is Ghost of Tsushima, and I am extremely excited for Spiderman 2, Alan Wake 2, and especially Final Fantasy 7 Rebirth. Maybe I just have a good eye to not be burned by titles like others have. I certainly don't like multiplayer FPS games for a reason.
1:56 A Jet Set Radio anime with OST by Hideki Naganuma would be dope.
i keep wondering maybe its not just the game developers higher-ups fault
but the players who keep throwing money at it is the part pf the problem
This whole conversation is why I stopped buying games on release. Instead, I buy used or on sale. That way, I save money and give myself time to catch up on my backlog.
Funny enough, Atlus has some of the most egregious DLC on day 1 for their games. P5 and Royal had a LOT of paid DLC at launch, sure it's mostly cosmetic, but you have scenarios you have whole Personas as DLC.
Don't forget p5 tactica has day 1 dlc for playable akechi and kasumi
The problem is executives who forces devs to release stuff way too early.
There are two different releases for overhyped games , one comes out with performances issues and half the promised features missing and the other with performance issues but deliveries on promised features and more , only on the second case people are willing to endure the issues because the game is complete and performance can always be fixed but missing content will probably never come.
If you are buying a new car and have six company options to pick from and know all will come with major problems but if your lucky you will pick the one company that ends up fixing their car you just have to pick the right one because the rest are lost causes, would that be a comfortable situation to be in ? or would it be better that 5 of the six cars will run and the one that doesn't will get recalled and you'll get your money back so you can chose another
Completely off topic, but does anyone know where Gigguk got that shirt at??? Its soooo dope. I def need it.
Hmm! Virulent capitalism really do be compromising the outcome quality of commercial art and entertainment media.
For me the "release when is ready" made so much sense for Cyberpunk, but software development is hard, management try to set deadlines that can't be meet.
They haven't be debugging a program for 2 weeks and feel hopeless.
This had to be the most clickbait title so far.
How is it clickbait?
@@harleygravis The tile implies everything is imploding but it’s just the usual big titles everyone love to shit about and hyperbolically say that’s the entire industry.
Talking about Jet Set Radio, can wait for the drop of Bomb Rush Cyberfunk this weekend
I agree so much on Metal slug and the timelessness of pixel art
Frame rate is one of those things I will simply never care about
I have no idea why people go on about it so much, like Bloodborne is 30FPS and it is still a near perfect game, not because of frames, but because it's FUN
i love bb but going back to it after experiencing every single other Soulsborne game in 60FPS is rough
Joey just sum up my thoughts on Atlus' Persona mainline game.
The best experience in gaming I've had recently was with an indie shooter called Battlebit, its so goooood.
My problem with Cyberpunk is that they promised this industry changing game that rivaled RDR 2 in scope in world. Which I don't think they met with either.
Cyberpunk barely rivals games from the early 2000's like San Andreas, Saints Row 2, etc. Nice way hell it had a chance with RDR 2.
No game company should be praised for releasing an unfinished mess at launch and then fixing it. It should've been that way at launch. Games are getting longer and longer development periods, and people are just gonna have to understand that waiting for quality is better. Cyberpunk should've been indefinitely delayed until It was finished. But CD project red needed to milk it for money. They were also being extremely shady about what people can talk about in reviews of their product pre-release. Which they did on purpose because many wouldn't have bought the game had they known the problems.
I played Cyberpunk at release and I didmt experienced any bugs and only had 1 crash. Rendering performance was sometimes an issue but nothing too bad. The cracks just showed up for me when i started modding the game.
Fromsoft has made an entire game Armored Core 6 n-between releasing the Elden ring DLC and the OG game, all Fromsoft DLC for their games so far have been well worth it in my opinion, none have felt like cheap cash grabs, I think that matters a lot to consumers mindsets
At 20 minutes long, I'm not sure this channel knows what a highlight is anymore.
Watched every second tho.
I agree that persona 5 royal isnt a dlc in the context of its PC Xbox and switch release, as someone who owns it on switch and Xbox I have no access to the game without the royal changes and additions. It's more like a minor remaster or enhanced edition like Pokemon platinum.
I actually agree with Connor with the DLC thing but I do like how Pokemon did it with bringing in new areas and bringing back other pokemon. Considering how massive the cast of Pokemon is, I understand not having the whole national dex in the base game. But considering most of the Pokemon experience is the post game collecting and comp battles, DLCs adding new/old Pokemon to the meta is great. Even though I love Sword and Shield I do think it could've been better and I agree that DLC content should've been the quality of the main game, that type of DLC where they just finish the base game.
You know it's bad when the best gaming experiences most of us had in the last few years came from either indie games or gacha games 💀
Triple A titles took a dip.
Good to see shit like BG3 or TOTK
Does Nintendo not count as a triple A gaming company, or are they just publishers now?
@@iantaakalla8180 I mentioned totk and bg3 as outliers to the usual tripleA titles. how did you miss that? :v
@@labibrashidinan9868play pikmin 4
gacha games? nah, most of them have shit gameplay that mostly runs on dophamine and fomo, there is absolutely nothing to do when your done with your dailys
I love how Joey is fine when Atlus do DLC /Expansions when lately they have way more notorious with a lot of their business practices. Lol
Yea Bandai too
There should be a minimum standard of release. Regardless if they fix it. People can wait as long if it’s good.
I think most people are happy to wait for a proper finished release, I would've happily waited 2-3 more years for CP2077, people are waiting for hollow knight silksong rn, even though some prefer to hear about a release I'd rather just have games get announced, shadow drop released when finished and then enjoyed
Games had such a large boost during covid and lockdowns that even a profitable game right now will show in the red compared to 2-3 years ago.
So many companies like game freak leave their games unfinished for years. Scarlet and violet will never be fixed
No it’s not. This is literally one of the best years in gaming we’ve ever had. There’s new great new ip’s(Hi-fi rush), great sequels(Jedi Survivor), great returning franchises( Res4, Dead space, Baldurs gate 3) and great games are coming like Spider-Man 2, Starfield and Alan wake 2. Not to mention all the great indies and great games that people have on their backlogs from previous years. No gaming is fine and if you can’t find enjoyment in any games nowadays then you probably just don’t like gaming anymore which is fine but that’s a you problem.
Res4 returning franchise??? Did you miss the others up to 8? And even 2 & 3 remakes???
Funny how almost everything you mentioned was single player games. I'd argue the state of multiplayer games is the real issue.
Don't forget Remnant 2 that just came out.
@@Bogglemanify Oh yeah that’s great too
@@siitvaan Did 2 & 3 remake come out this year???? No they did not. Try to keep up bro
No, it's like going to taco bell, buy a taco, get taco shell and some lattice. Then you come back a few days later, and you pay because the DLC's are never free, for another taco and get a taco with an extra slice of tomato and you applause them.
Agree 100% with Conner regarding the DLC. BotW, Pokemon, ACNH, etc. all have DLC but I will never play it because I don't play those games anymore.
Xenoblade does dlc better than anything else, half the price of the base games to get new game modes and bonuses along with full separate game prequel stories that would normally go for the cost of a new full game from most developers
One counter to DLCs: proper expansion packs, like with both Hearts of Stone and Blood and Wine of Witcher 3. Both were a whole game worth of content, while working well for Witcher, especially as original novels had both the saga and short stories compilations
There was around 4 years between P5 and Royal to be fair.
I agree that companies shouldn't release DLC. I respect the Trails series because each entry is complete, even if the story isn't complete, and each gives incentive to replay it by making the best weapons/armor partially or completely unavailable on a first run through alone. It's a better structure than making a game that doesn't give incentive to replay and then tacts on an interesting but irrelevant (to me the consumer) expansion a year or more later.
The OGs who know how fkin crazy Far Cry 3 Blood Dargon Remix was back then 🔥
I really enjoy pokemon DLC because I replay pokemon games with different teams a lot
The only DLC I tend to like are stuff like Xenoblade Chronicle's DLC and thats because the DLC is just a different Game disguised as DLC
Torna and Future Redeemed are just Prequels to their respective games and to me thats the best kind of DLC rather than just a few quality of life updates and new Quests, my mind goes those should have been in the game anyways i shouldnt be paying for it but the Prequels, justified in my mind
For me, it's been FromSoft. Haven't been disappointed with any of their DLCs.
I certainly hope not
why older games is still hold up because it's a finished and completed games so we don't have to wait a year to play the games beside the prices coming down the only thing that hold us to play a game its the price. I hate it that now it becomes a standard and the norm to release unfinished game then update it a month later in this case is dying light 2 and cyberpunk which is a good decision on the business point of view but its a bad thing on the customer side cause it is basically a bad product that the company gives to their customers
Heres a good way of putting it.
Due to it being such a new mainstream media industry, it doesn't seem to be figured out yet, plus with higher ups in multi-billion dollar corporations who are all like 60 and never played a game in their lives, it'll change with the next generation, us.
A film is each set scene and shows the audience only what they want to be seen for 2 hours, games have 50+ hours most the time with every possible angle needing to be made in a unique way, and these higher ups want that done in 2-3 years, when the average should be 8-10. Games are like Marvel movies, pumped out too quickly by greedy businessmen, it will change though.
Quite the clickbaity title, i’d say this year is the best gaming has been in the last half a decade with how many good games are coming out. Just off the top of my head: RE4r, DSr, BBr, SF6, HFR, R2, P4, BG3, Totk, FF16.
And there are still quite a few big games that haven’t come out yet: AC6, SF, SM2, T8, MK, SMW.
Cyberpunk is still crashing for me on PS4. I try to play now and then, but the crashes just ruin it as I have to wait for everything to boot up again.
the xenoblade 2 and 3 dlcs were well worth the money torna and future connected were amazing
Ahh Mass Effect! Garnt with a mega superior take there
We all know and we’d ALL complain if game devs released dlcs shortly after a game’s release. And we’d ALL say “why wasn’t this packaged in the release? Greedy cash grab, cut content”.
I mean Ive begun to die away from video games, I had fun during the black ops 3 era, star wars battlefront 2, the fortnite golden era, minecraft, titanfall one of my all time favorite fps games. But nowadays you will get a few games that are worth it god of war, spiderman ps, hogwarts legacy, legend of zelda breath of the wild and tears of kingdom.
I remember reading gaming magazines about news of upcoming Dark Souls 2 DLC when I was in military service, and got excited to go back and play them once they were out. It was a different experience from waiting for a new game because you know you'll get something fun with a game you're familiar with. So yeah, gotta disagree with Connor here with all due respect for his opinion.
RDC has a great video that summarizes up how I feel about DLC. “No people don’t want to pay $60 for a full game. They want to pay $60 for half the game and then pay another $60 for the other half.”
The Lain Tshirt goes hard in the paint!
early access makes sense in idie games when you need gamers feedback before the official launch
4:55 I think he meant conjecture, not contecture 😅
I am a 38 year old gamer, and Metal Slug still has the greatest pixel animation of all time.
And amazing Soundtrack
9:27 I have a different take on DLC. I would rather buy a proper DLC, with a new story characters etc. then buying a numbered sequel that felt like an asset flip of the previous game with a different storyline.
A great example of this is borderlands 2 and the worse example of this is Overwatch 2.
i played immortal phoenix rising recently because zelda TOTK released and i don't have switch, I actually really enjoyed it. Only to find out earlier this month that Ubisoft cancelled the second project and choosing to make 6 games of assassins intead, the game that i never played after unity which i got for free from steam event. It's soo stupid!
Cyberpunk's release on old gen consoles were terrible, however, on Day 1, it had 77% metacritic score on PC and was always on mostly positive reviews on Steam, so on PC it was in good condition and only got much better after the updates. I personally played on Day 1 and experienced minor bugs. The bugs that I experienced were just the same bugs that I experience in most other games like clipping issues. Cyberpunk is one of the best games that I've played and I've played a lot of great games like Ghost of Tsushima, The Witcher 3, etc. The main story in CP77 is so engaging, and even the side missions were impactful, none were repetitive, and the world building in the game is great if you do all the side stuff, read the shards, listen in the conversations of npcs, etc. It's a game that rewards players who take their time to stop and smell the roses. Sadly, a lot of players expected a sandbox game out of it and played it like a sandbox game, when first and foremost it's an RPG, not another GTA.
Ive just watched several videos about how Baldur’s Gate 3 is blowing through records and that was made by a literal independent studio so AAA publishers are running out of excuses for putting out inferior product on release fast. The execs can huff only so much copium before they realize how stupid the are and bloating their games like they do makes them look worse and worse.
Amen, stop sending these abusive companies your hard-earned money.
Saying Larian is "a literal independent studio" is technically true in that they're an independent company, but also they're a 450 people company (more than FromSoftware for instance) that's been going on for more than 20 years with their own successful RPG franchise (the Divinity series), which they've gotten big enough to self publish for a decade.
Connor didn’t give a shit take at all. He’s right. We shouldn’t be paying 20-30+ dollars when we already overpaid for the game lol. Games should ALL cost as much as the upcoming AC mirage, not over 100 dollars like it is in Canada and most other places in the world. Then they expect more on top of that. If you’re going to make me pay 99 bucks with even more in tax on top, I should be getting a COMPLETE product.
That depends on the DLC, if it just a measly lame cosmetic or one short campaign, then it's not worth it. However if it is the opposite then it's worth it.
The thing is that most DLC is of the cheap additions kind. So in general, unless you tack on another game or intricate story, it either should be free or in the base game to begin with.
If you think gaming is on a downward spiral I implore you to expand your horizons and try any of the 85+ rated games that have come out the past decade. There's plenty out there.
Why is a game in the thumbnail that isn’t even mentioned in the video?
The dlc take about Elden ring they literally did go and make another game being armoured core 6 and more just a from software and thing is the dlc is definitely more for hardcore fans who want more lore and explanations to the many open ended things we are left with typically at the end of a from software game and 99% of the time the DLC are very well done and worth playing IF you're a fan of the games
my thoughts on Connor's contravertial DLC take with Elden Ring
I was reminded of the several versions of Street Fighter game editions. (and I guess this is like Joey's Persona5 R take)
Aren’t sequels to any game technically DLC?
If we look at Zelda tears of the kingdom, it’s literally the same world with added content. Similarly, Monster Hunter World had a legit DLC called Iceborne that pretty much does the same thing Tears of the kingdom did with breath of the wild. They added more content in an already established world.
It's joever, Jamers.
I believe, as long as you pack the game with content and tell the story that needs to be told, you can make DLC. I see DLC as the stuff you couldn’t get in the game in time or after the game is good and done and you come up with something new you’d like to add that’d be great too. Imagine RDR3 coming out full and complete and 1 of the DLC’S is a backstory to the events of Blackwater or maybe the main character as a bounty hunter, hunts down Dutch’s gang at and although it’s not so long that it’s it’s own game, it’s still decent and fulfilling seeing the unique tactics each member would take when they have to battle at their peak, like Charles channeling his ancestors fighting like a wild beast in a cloud of hallucinogenic smoke or Pearson fighting you in a battlefield under the full weight of his Navy training. Ultimately ending with a choice fight against John/Arthur with the one you didn’t kill first becoming much stronger and deadlier. You finally get to Dutch and end him with the book closing to Uncle finishing the story as he was mysteriously absent from the hunt, with Arthur coughing and telling him to “get a move on”, revealing this was non-canon and it takes place later in RDR2
11:35 i agree with Joey 100%. Persona 5 Royal is not a DLC. Atlus pretty much added a whole new lore in the main story from beginning to end. DLC is when you beat the main game and give you extra content thats not even that important to the main story
so fuck Persona 5?
The way Atlus does re-releases bugs me though. Why should I buy the original release when there will be a better version of the game with improved gameplay and the ‘true ending’ three years later?
The Royal content could easily be sold as separate DLC for the vanilla game with the gameplay changes being there since launch.
Baldur's Gate 3 - Start playing!
At this point high ranks on dev studios are pretty much mr krabs
Shout to Metal Slug, my childhood
I never bought No Man’s Sky, Sonic Colors Ultimate, Cyberpunk, or Pokemon Scarlet Violet. Reason? I expect games to be feature complete at launch. Fuck this “wait for patches” mindset so much, it’s undermining AAA releases so hard.
I agree with Connor about DLCs. I'd rather wait another year for a game if it got released with everything at once. CBA DLC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If they release everything at once including the dlc then the price would be still 120$
Sf6,mk1,tekken 8, and granblue rising coming out wyn?
pixel graphics are G.O.A.T.ed
the problem isn't that the developers came back to fix the game, its the countless studios that don't, if the standard is developers can release broken unfinished games witch their is a 70 to 90 % chance it wont ever get completed so you wasted your money but don't worry because you might of got the game that will be fix, that is a absolutely terrible base line to be at for consumer's
about the unfinished product thing i swear its also the consumers fault. Dont yall remember when halo infinite was gonna come out but instead they said they need more time and we said yes take ur time make it good then ppl basically started rioting on forums that it was taking to long
Haven't watched the episode yet but since Sojourn is in the thumbnail, F for Overwatch 2(Highest Negatively rated game on steam rn) and FU for Blizzard Activision
Early access is essentially you paying to be a beta tester for them